Armbusinessbank – The Most Active Participant In KfW Mortgage Progra

ARMBUSINESSBANK – THE MOST ACTIVE PARTICIPANT IN KFW MORTGAGE PROGRAMME IN THE FIRST QUARTER 2009

ArmInfo
2009-04-21 15:43:00

ArmInfo. According to the results of the first quarter 2009
Armbusinessbank – is the most active participant in the German KfW
bank’s mortgage programme on development of stable market of housing
financing, head of KfW office in Armenia, Karapet Gevorkyan, told
ArmInfo correspondent.

He also added that ARARATBANK occupied the second place, Universal
Credit company "First Mortgage Company" – the third, Inecobank – the
forth and Universal Credit company "Washington Capital" – the fifth
place. The total of 11 organizations were registered to take part
in this programme, including 9 banks and 2 credit companies. Within
the frames of the programme 10 years were fixed as minimal credit
repayment term, and minimal size of prepayment rose from 30% up to 50%
of the house bought.

Javahk Armenians Call On Turks To Repent

JAVAHK ARMENIANS CALL ON TURKS TO REPENT

PanArmenian News
April 20 2009
Armenia

In memory of 94th anniversary of Armenian Genocide, Javahk Armenians
called on Turks to repent and come to terms with their past. The
statement of Javahk Diaspora and Public Organizations representatives
says that the fact of Genocide, acknowledged by many European states
and world parliaments mustn’t be an object of speculation.

Statement authors expressed their appreciation for the courage of
Turkish scientists , writers and intelligentÑ~Aia representatives who
took serious riskÑ~A by speaking the truth about the Genocide. "These
people understood that accepting their on history, dark as some of
its pages were, is an important part of building a democratic society."

The statement calls on all people of goodwill to join their voices
to the demand to acknowledge and condemn the Armenian Genocide.

Statistical Report: Armenia’S Gdp Reduces 6.1% To Amd 465.5 Billion

STATISTICAL REPORT: ARMENIA’S GDP REDUCES 6.1% TO AMD 465.5 BILLION

/ARKA/
April 20, 2009
YEREVAN

Armenia’s GDP reduced 6.1% in Jan-March 2009, compared with the same
period of the previous year, to AMD 465.5 billion ($1429.9 million)
National Statistical Service of Armenia reports.

In Jan-March 2008, 9% economic growth was recorded in Armenia. In
the state budget, GDP growth is planned for 9.2% in 2009. ($1 =
AMD 372.84).

Turkey, Washington’s Geopolitical Pivot

TURKEY, WASHINGTON’S GEOPOLITICAL PIVOT
F. William Engdahl

Online Journal Contributing Writer
Apr 17, 2009, 00:13

The recent visit of US President Obama to Turkey was far more
significant than the president’s speech would suggest. For Washington,
Turkey today has become a geopolitical "pivot state" which is in the
position to tilt the Eurasian power equation towards Washington or
significantly away from it, depending on how Turkey develops its ties
with Moscow and its role regarding key energy pipelines.

If Ankara decides to collaborate more closely with Russia, Georgia’s
position is precarious and Azerbaijan’s natural gas pipeline route to
Europe, the so-called Nabucco Pipeline, is blocked. If it cooperates
with the United States and manages to reach a stable treaty with
Armenia under US auspices, the Russian position in the Caucasus is
weakened and an alternative route for natural gas to Europe opens up,
decreasing Russian leverage against Europe.

For Washington, the key to bringing Germany into closer cooperation
with the US is to weaken German dependence on Russian energy
flows. Twice in the past three winters Washington has covertly
incited its hand-picked president in Ukraine, Viktor Yushchenko,
to arrange an arbitrary cut-off of Russian gas flows to Germany and
other EU destinations. The only purpose of the actions was to convince
EU governments that Russia was not a reliable energy partner. Now,
with the Obama’s visit to Ankara, Washington is attempting to win
Turkish support for its troubled Nabucco alternative gas pipeline
through Turkey from Azerbaijan, which would, theoretically at least,
lessen EU dependence on Russian gas.

The Turkish-EU problem

However willing Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan might be to accommodate
Obama, the question of Turkish relations with the EU is inextricably
linked with the troublesome issue of Turkish membership to the EU,
a move vehemently opposed by France and also less openly by Germany.

Turkey is one of the only routes energy from new sources can cross
to Europe from the Middle East, Central Asia or the Caucasus. If
Turkey — which has considerable influence in the Caucasus, Central
Asia, Ukraine, the Middle East and the Balkans — is prepared to
ally with the United States, Russia is on the defensive and German
ties to Russia weaken considerably. If Turkey decides to cooperate
with Russia instead, Russia retains the initiative and Germany is
dependent on Russian energy. Since it became clear in Moscow that
US strategy was to extend NATO to Russia’s front door via Ukraine
and Georgia, Russia has moved to use its economic "carrot," its vast
natural gas resources, to at the very least neutralize Western Europe,
especially Germany, towards Russia. It is notable in that regard that
the man chosen as Russia’s Preside nt in December 1999 had spent a
significant part of his KGB career in Germany.

Turkey and the US game

It is becoming clear that Obama and Washington are playing a deeper
game. A few weeks before the meetings, when it had become obvious that
the Europeans were not going to bend on the issues, such as troops
for Afghanistan or more economic stimulus, that concerned the United
States, Obama scheduled the trip to Turkey.

During the recent EU meetings in Prague, Obama actively backed Turkey’s
application for EU membership knowing well that that put especially
France and Germany in a difficult position, as EU membership would
allow free migration which many EU countries fear. Obama deliberately
confronted EU states with this knowing he was playing with geopolitical
fire, especially as the US is no member of the EU. It was a deliberate
and cheap way to score points with the Erdogan government of Turkey.

During the NATO meeting, a key item on the agenda was the selection
of a new alliance secretary-general. The favorite was former Danish
Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen. Turkey opposed him because of
his defense of cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed published in
a Danish magazine. NATO operates on consensus, so any one member can
block Rasmussen. The Turks backed off the veto, and in return won
two key positions in NATO, including that of deputy secretary-general.

Turkey, thereby, boosted its sta nding in NATO and got Obama to
vigorously defend the Turkish application for membership in the
European Union, which of course the United States does not belong
to. Obama then went to Turkey for a key international meeting that will
allow him to further position the United States in relation to Islam.

The Russian dimension

During US-Russian talks, there had been no fundamental shift by Obama
from the earlier position of the Bush administration. Russia rejects
Washington’s idea of pressuring Iran on its nuclear program in return
for a bargain of an undefined nature with Washington over US planned
missile and radar bases in Poland and the Czech Republic. The US
claimed it need not rely on Russia to bring military and other supplies
into Afghanistan, claiming it had reached agreement with Ukraine to
transship military supplies, a move designed by Washington to increase
friction between Moscow and Kiew. Moreover, the NATO communique
did not abandon the idea of Ukraine and Georgia being admitted to
NATO. The key geopolitical prize for Washington remains Moscow but
clearly Turkey is being wooed by Obama to play a role in that game.

Germany will clearly not join Obama in blocking Russia. Not only does
Germany depend on Russia for energy supplies. She has no desire to
confront a Russia that Berlin sees as no real immediate threat to
Germany. For Berlin, at least now, they are not going to address the
Rus sian question.

At the same time, an extremely important event between Turkey and
Armenia is shaping up. Armenians had long held Turkey responsible for
the mass murder of Armenians during and after World War I, a charge
the Turks have denied.

The US Congress is considering a provocative resolution condemning
"Turkish genocide" against Armenians. Turkey is highly sensitive to
these charges, and congressional passage of such a resolution would
mean a Turkish break in diplomatic relations with Washington. Now
since the Obama visit, Ankara has begun to discuss an agreement with
Armenia, including diplomatic relations which would eliminate the
impact of any potential US Congress resolution.

A Turkish opening to Armenia would alter the balance of power in
the entire region. Since the August 2008 Georgia-Russia conflict,
the Caucasus, a strategically vital area to Moscow, has been
unstable. Russian troops remain in South Ossetia. Russia also has
troops in Armenia meaning Russia has Georgia surrounded.

Turkey is the key link in this complex game of geopolitical balance of
power between Washington and Moscow. If Turkey decides to collaborate
with Russia, Georgia’s position becomes very insecure and Azerbaijan’s
possible pipeline route to Europe is blocked. If Turkey decides
to cooperate with Washington and at the same time reaches a stable
agreement with Armenia under US guidance, Russia’s entire position
in the Caucasus is weakened and an alternative route for natural
gas to Europe becomes available, reducing Russian leverage against
Western Europe.

Therefore, having sat through fruitless meetings with the Europeans,
Obama chose not to cause a pointless confrontation with a Europe
that is out of options. Instead, Obama completed his trip by going
to Turkey to discuss what the treaty with Armenia means and to try
to convince the Turks to play for high stakes by challenging Russia
in the Caucasus, rather than playing Russia’s junior partner.

The most important Obama speech in his European tour came after Turkey
won key posts in the NATO political structure with US backing. In his
speech, Obama sided with Turkey against the EU and in effect showed
Turkey Washington was behind her. Obama’s speech addressed Turkey as
an emerging regional power, which was well received in Ankara. The
sweet words will cost Turkey dearly if it acts on them.

Moscow is not sitting passively by as Washington woos Turkey. Turkish
President Abdullah Gul paid a four-day visit to the Russian Federation
this February, where he met with President Dmitry Medvedev, Prime
Minister Putin, and also traveled to Kazan, the capital of Tatarstan,
where he discussed joint investments. Gul was accompanied by his
minister for foreign trade and minister of energy, as well as a large
delegation of Turkish businessmen.

The stakes in this complex three-way Grea t Game for domination of
Eurasia have been raised significantly following the Obama trip to
Ankara. Turkey imports 65 percent of its natural gas and 25 percent
of its oil from Russia. Therefore, Turkey is also developing a growing
dependency on Russian energy resources, including coal.

On March 27, a memorandum was signed between the Azerbaijani oil
company SOCAR and Russia’s Gazprom. The memorandum includes a statement
of deliveries, beginning in January 2010, of Azerbaijani natural gas
to Russia.

Gazprom was particularly interested in signing such an agreement
with Azerbaijan, not the least because Azerbaijan is the only state
outside Iran or Turkmenistan, both of which are problematic, that
could supply gas to the planned EU Nabucco pipeline, for transporting
natural gas from Azerbaijan and the Central Asia states through
Turkey to southeastern Europe. In reality, gas may come only from
Azerbaijan. Russia has proposed an alternative to Nabucco project,
South Stream, also in need of Azerbaijani gas, so in effect Russia
weakens the chances of realization of Nabucco.

Obama strategy is clearly not less confrontational with Russia. It
is merely playing with a slightly different deck of cards than did
Cheney and Bush.

F. William Engdahl is author of A Century of War: Anglo-American
Oil Politics and the New World Order (Pluto Press), and Seeds
of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation
(www.globalresearch.c a). His latest book, Full Spectrum Dominance:
Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order (Third Millennium
Press) is due in late April. He may be reached via his website,

www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net.

Syrian Government Supports Academy That Teaches Historic Language Of

SYRIAN GOVERNMENT SUPPORTS ACADEMY THAT TEACHES HISTORIC LANGUAGE OF CHRIST

Irish Times
09/0416/1224244810646.html
Thursday, April 16, 2009

ILYANA BARQIL wears skinny jeans, boots and a fur-lined jacket,
handy for keeping out the cold in the Qalamoun mountains north
of Damascus. She likes TV quiz shows and American films and enjoys
swimming. But this thoroughly modern Syrian teenager is also learning
Aramaic, the language spoken by Jesus.

Ilyana (15) is part of a big effort to preserve and revive the world’s
oldest living tongue. Last November she started classes at the newly
established Aramaic Language Academy in the picturesque village of
Maaloula, where the residents speak more or less the same language
as Galileans did 2,000 years ago.

"My father speaks Aramaic but my mother doesn’t as she’s from Lebanon,"
Ilyana says. "I want to be fluent. I don’t know too much about the
Aramaic language but I do know it’s ancient."

Aramaic is a Semitic tongue related to Hebrew and Arabic and
was once the day-to-day language of parts of modern-day Syria and
Israel. Christ’s lament on the cross – "Eli, Eli, lama sabachtani?" (my
God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?) – was uttered in Aramaic. The
long decline of the language accelerated as the region opened up in
the 1920s when the French colonial autho rities built a road from
Damascus to Aleppo. Television and the internet, and youngsters
leaving to work, reduced the number of speakers.

Recognised by Unesco as a "definitely endangered" language, Aramaic
is spoken by just 7,000 people in Maaloula, and about 8,000 in two
nearby villages.

But things are looking up, particularly since the University of
Damascus founded its language academy, with government help. The
facility has modern premises, a bank of PCs, new textbooks, a teaching
staff of six and 85 students at three levels.

"When I was at school over 30 years ago we were not allowed to speak
Aramaic," says Mukhail Bkheil, standing behind the counter in Abu
George’s souvenir shop in Maaloula’s main square. "Now, thanks to
President Assad we even have an institute teaching it."

Syria being Syria, there are political sensitivities, not least because
"Arabisation" was a key feature of government education policy after
the Baath party came to power in the 1960s.

"In Syria there are a lot of minority groups – Circassians, Armenians,
Kurds and Assyrians – so it’s a big decision to allow the teaching
of other languages in government schools," says Imad Reihan, a pillar
of the Aramaic academy.

"But the government is interested in promoting the Aramaic language
because it goes back so deep into Syria’s history .."

Reihan and colleagues were delighted recently when a Unesco team
visited, and they are now hoping for funds to allow them to collate
the vanishing words into proper dictionaries.

Improbably, Aramaic was given a boost by a Hollywood film – Mel
Gibson’s controversial Passion of the Christ , which was released in
2004 before the academy was set up.

Observers say the opening of the school indicates a more relaxed
attitude by the regime. Considering the bitter enmity between
Syria and Israel, which dispute sovereignty over the Golan Heights –
declared an Israeli occupied territory by the UN – it is striking that
Aramaic letters are so similar to the Hebrew of rabbinical texts –
one reason, perhaps, why the only Aramaic sign in Maaloula is on the
academy. "Otherwise people might think some buildings were Israeli
settlements," jokes one visitor from Damascus.

Linguists say Syria is doing well in fostering this heritage. "Aramaic
is actually pretty healthy in Maaloula," said Prof Geoffrey Kahn, who
teaches Semitic philology at Cambridge University. "It’s the eastern
Aramaic dialects in Turkey, Iraq and Iran that are really endangered."

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/20

Sergey Shakaryants: Armenia-Turkey Honeymoon Is Over

SERGEY SHAKARYANTS: ARMENIA-TURKEY HONEYMOON IS OVER
Gita Elibekyan

"Radiolur"
16.04.2009 17:22

The only precondition Turkey sets for the opening of the border is
the Karabakh issue, political scientist Sergey Shakaryants told a
press conference today. At the same time, he added that Turkey was
not at all interested in the Genocide issue. "It seems they have got
guarantees on the issue," he said.

Political scientist Stepan Grigoryan adheres to the opposite opinion.

According to him, Turkey has now changed its tough position on Nagorno
Karabakh. "Five years ago Turkey was clearly saying that the border
issue would be discussed only in case Armenia withdrew from the seven
regions, while today it asks for one thing, namely some progress on
the Karabakh issue," he said.

Sergey Shakaryan considers that Turkey continues insisting on
the Karabakh settlement as a precondition for the opening of the
border. "The Armenian sides should definitely lose and accept their
capitulation on the Artsakh issue. This is what Turkey demands," he
said. However, Armenia will not agree to this condition, Shakaryants
said, noting that it became clear after President Sargsyan’s speech
in Iran that Armenia has rejected the proposal, which means that the
"Armenian-Turkish honeymoon is over."

CSTO Ministerial Meeting In Yerevan

CSTO MINISTERIAL MEETING IN YEREVAN

ArmInfo
2009-04-15 12:04:00

ArmInfo. Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) Ministerial
Meeting is underway in Yerevan. The key topic of the meeting is the
combined fight against organized crime. Other issuers related to
establishment and operation of the Collective Rapid Response Force
(CRRF) and interaction of the CSTO law-enforcement agencies are on
the agenda of the meeting. The meeting will over on April 17.

The decision to create CRRF was made at the extraordinary summit of
the CSTO Collective Security Council on February 4 in Moscow. Earlier,
CSTO Secretary General Nikolay Bordyuzha said CRRF will consist of
two components – troops of special appointment (airmobile forces),
capable of moving to any points of CSTO states for the localization
of armed conflicts, and the force of special appointment from the
security services, Interior Ministries for the special operations
of anti-terrorist and anti-narcotic nature. As part of the events,
joint tactical and special exercises on hostages release will be
conducted with participation of the Russian Interior Ministry and
Armenian Police Special Forces.

ANKARA: Turkish PM To Visit Armenia For Black Sea Meeting

TURKISH PM TO VISIT ARMENIA FOR BLACK SEA MEETING

April 15 2009
Turkey

Turkish FM Babacan will attend a meeting of the Black Sea Economic
Cooperation in Yerevan.

Turkish Foreign Minister Ali Babacan will travel to Armenia on Thursday
for a regional summit in a step towards restoring diplomatic ties
after a century of hostility between the neighbours.

Babacan will attend a meeting of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation
in Yerevan, the Foreign Ministry said in an e-mailed statement on
Wednesday.

Turkey and Armenia, which have no diplomatic ties, have been engaged
in high-level talks since last year. Turkish President Abdullah Gul
travelled to Yerevan last year to attend a football match between
the two countries.

Turkey is considering opening the border with Armenia, which it closed
in 1993 in solidarity with its traditional, Muslim ally Azerbaijan.

Armenia and Azerbaijan are in dispute over the breakaway enclave of
Nagorno Karabakh, controlled by ethnic Armenians.

Turkey accepts that many Christian Armenians were killed by Ottoman
Turks during World War One and that Muslims also died in internecine
fighting, but denies that up to 1.5 million died

www.worldbulletin.net

First Step Toward Reconciliation

FIRST STEP TOWARD RECONCILIATION
Uri Avnery, [email protected]

Arab News
;section=0 &article=121465&d=13&m=4&y=2009
Ap ril 13 2009
Saudi Arabia

"Rest has come to the weary…"

Passover week is a time for outings. News programs on radio and
television start with words like: "The masses of the House of Israel
spent the day in the national parks…"

It is also a feast of homeland songs. On television one sees groups of
white-haired oldsters surrounded by their children and grandchildren
fervently singing the songs of their youth, the words of which they
know by heart.

"Rest has come to the weary/And repose to the toiler/A pale night
spreads/Over the fields of the Valley of Jezreel/Dew below and the
moon above/ From Beit-Alfa to Nahalal…"

The camera focuses on the furrowed face of a grandmother with wet
eyes, and it is not hard to imagine her as the beautiful girl she once
was. It is easy to see her in a Jezreel kibbutz, with short pants and
a long braid swinging behind her, smiling, bowed over tomato plants
in the communal vegetable garden.

Nostalgia is having a field day.

I admit that I am not free from this nostalgia. Something happens to
me, too, when I hear the songs, and I join in them involuntarily.

Like many others, I am suffering from "cognitive dissonance". The
heart and the head are not coordinated. They operate on different
wavelengths. In other words, my head knows that the Zionist enterprise
has imposed a historic injustice on the people who lived in this
land. But my heart remembers what we felt in those days.

At the age of 10, a few weeks after our flight from Nazi Germany and
arrival in this country, my parents sent me to Nahalal, the first
Moshav (communal village). I lived with a family of "peasants" —
there were not yet known as "agriculturists" — in order to get
"acclimatized" and learn Hebrew.

What was Nahalal like in those days? 75 families, their small
white houses arranged in a perfect circle, who worked from sunrise
to sunset. In the winter, the village became a sea of mud, which
stuck to your rubber boots and felt as heavy as lead. In summer,
the temperature was often around blood heat. We, the children, went
out to work with the adults, and sometimes it was almost unbearable.

Everyone lived in indescribable poverty. A small glass of homemade
wine on Friday night was the height of luxury. Money was measured
in piasters (dimes). When the mother of the family, at long last,
got a Singer sewing machine and could make the family new clothes,
it was a cause for celebration.

When the poet Nathan Alterman wrote about the "rest for the weary",
it was not a poetic phrase. He was talking about real people.

These people were the sons and daughters of the St. Petersburg and
Kiev bourgeoisie, spoilt children of well-to-do parents, who came here
to "build the country", walking with open eyes into a life of abject
poverty and back-breaking work, learning a foreign language and giving
up their mother tongue forever. During the first years they worked hard
to drain the swamp on their land. I can’t imagine that after a day’s
work any of them had the energy left to read Tolstoy or Dostoyevsky.

They knew, of course, that there were Arabs around. On the road from
Nahalal to Haifa they went past Arab villages. They saw fellaheen
working in the fields. But they were from another world. That year —
1934 — was still tranquil, the quiet before the storm of the 1936
"disturbances". They had no contact with Arabs, did not understand
their language, had no idea at all about what went on in their heads
when they saw the Jews tending their fields.

What they knew was that the fields of the Jezreel Valley, many of
which had been swamps, had been bought with good money from an Arab
landowner. Nobody thought about the peasants who had lived on this
land and derived from it their daily bread for generations, and who
were evicted when the rich absentee landowner sold it to the Jewish
National Fund.

Nostalgia is a human emotion. In every generation, old people remember
their youth, and mostly it appears to them as an age of purity and
happiness.

This natural, personal nostalgia is joined in our case by another
feeling, which causes the old songs to flood us with longing for the
innocence of those days, the virtue, the belief in "the rightness of
the way", when everything looked so simple.

We felt then that we were taking part in an unprecedented heroic
undertaking, creating a new world, a new society, a new human being,
a new culture, a new language. We remembered where we came from —
from a Europe that was turning into a hell for the Jews. We knew that
it was our duty to build a safe haven for millions of Jews who were
living in growing danger (even though nobody could yet imagine the
Holocaust) and who had nowhere to escape to.

There was a spirit of togetherness, of belonging, of idealism. The
new songs expressed it. We all sang them in the youth movements,
at Kibbutz evenings, during trips around the country, even in the
diverse underground organizations, and of course at school.

When the "disturbances" started in April 1936, we did not see them
as an "Arab Revolt". Like the "pogrom" of 1921 and the "massacre" of
1929, they looked to us like a British plot to incite the ignorant
Arabs against us in order to continue to rule the country. The
"incited" Arab crowds attacked us because they did not understand
how good we were for them. They did not grasp that we were bringing
to the country progress, modern agriculture, health care, socialism,
workers’ solidarity. Their leaders, the rich "Effendis" (Turkish for
noblemen) were inciting them because they were afraid that they would
learn from us to demand higher wages. And there were, of course, those
who believed that the Arabs were murdering for the sake of murdering,
that murder was their nature.

These were not cynical excuses. Zionism was not cynical. The entire
Yishuv (the new Hebrew society) believed in this doctrine. In
retrospect one can say: This belief was necessary in order to keep
up the idealist spirit while ignoring the other side of the coin.

Vladimir Ze’ev Jabotinsky, who lived abroad and had no part in the
pioneer endeavor of (the socialist) "Working Eretz Israel", looked
at things from afar and saw them as they were: Already in the 1920s
he stated that the Palestinian Arabs were behaving as any people
would if they saw strangers coming to their country with the intent
of turning it into their own homeland. But only a few listened to him.

On the Zionist left there were always some groups and individuals
who tried to find a compromise between Zionism and the people of the
land, which would not hinder the Zionists from settling all over the
country. It was 1946 before there came into being the first group (of
which I was one of the founders) which recognized the Palestinian —
and the general Arab — National Movement and proposed striking an
alliance with it.

In 1948, the songs of the war of independence joined the pioneer
songs. Regarding them, too, not a few among us suffer from cognitive
dissonance. On the one side — what we felt then. On the other —
the truth as we know it now.

For the fighters — as for the entire Yishuv — it was, quite simply,
an existential war. The slogan was "There is No Alternative", and
all of us believed in it completely. We were fighting with our backs
to the wall, the lives of our families hanging in the balance. The
enemy was all around us. We believed that we, the few, the very few,
almost without arms, were standing up against a sea of Arabs. In
the first half of the war, the Arab fighters (known to us as "the
gangs") indeed dominated all the roads, and in the second half, the
regular Arab armies approached the centers of the Hebrew population,
surrounding Hebrew Jerusalem and coming close to Tel-Aviv. The Yishuv
lost 6,000 young people out of a population of some 635,000. Whole
year-groups were decimated. Innumerable heroic acts were performed.

The idealism of the fighters found its expression in the songs. Most of
them are imbued with faith in victory, and, of course, total conviction
of the justness of our cause. We did not leave Arabs behind our lines,
nor did the Arabs leave any Jews behind theirs. It looked in those
circumstances like a simple military necessity. The fighters did not
think then about "ethnic cleansing" — a term not yet invented.

We had no understanding about the real balance of power between us and
the other side. The Arabs looked to us like a huge force. We did not
know that the Palestinians were quarreling with each other, unable to
unite and to create a countrywide defense force, that they had a severe
shortage of modern arms. Later, when the Arab armies joined the fray,
we did not know that they were unable to cooperate with each other,
that it was more important for them to compete with each other than
to defeat us.

Today, a growing number of Israelis have started to understand the
full significance of the "Nakba", the great tragedy of the Palestinian
people and all the individuals who lost their homes and most of their
homeland. But the songs come and remind us of what we felt at the
time, when the things happened. An abyss yawns between the emotional
reality of those days and the historical truth as we know it now.

Some see the entire 1948 war as a conspiracy of the Zionist leadership
which intended right from the beginning to expel the Palestinians from
the country in order to turn it into a Jewish state. According to this
view, the soldiers of 1948 were war criminals who implemented a vicious
policy, much as the pioneers of the preceding generation were land
robbers, knights of ethnic cleansing by expulsion and expropriation.

They are strengthened in this view by today’s settlers, who are
driving the Palestinians from what remains of their land. By their
actions they blacken the pioneer past. Religious fanatics and fascist
hooligans, who claim to be the heirs of the pioneers, obliterate
the real intentions of that generation. How can one overcome the
contradiction between the intentions and emotions of the actors
and their many magnificent achievements in building a new nation,
and the dark side of their actions and the consequences?

How to sing about the hopes and dreams of our youth and at the same
time admit to the terrible injustice of many of our actions? Sing with
full heart the pioneer songs and the 1948 war songs (one of which I
wrote, of which I am far from proud), without denying the terrible
tragedy we imposed on the Palestinian people?

Barack Obama told the Turkish people this week that they must come to
grips with the massacre of the Armenians committed by their fathers,
while at the same time reminding the Americans that they must confront
the genocide of the Native Americans and the black slavery exploited
by their own forefathers.

I believe we can do this regarding the catastrophe that we have
caused the Palestinians. I am convinced that this is important,
indeed essential, for our own national mental health, as well as
a first step toward eventual reconciliation. We must acknowledge
and recognize the consequences of our deeds and repair what can be
repaired — without rejecting our past and the songs that express
the innocence of our youth.

http://www.arabnews.com/?page=7&amp

Serzh Sargsyan: Armenia Highlights Dynamics Development Of Relations

SERZH SARGSYAN: ARMENIA HIGHLIGHTS DYNAMICS DEVELOPMENT OF RELATIONS WITH IRAN

ArmInfo
2009-04-14 13:27:00

ArmInfo. Presidents of Armenia and Iran, Serzh Sargsyan and Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad highly appreciated the two countries’ relations at a
meeting in Tehran Monday. S. Sargsyan left on a two-day official
visit to Iran on April 13. The presidential delegation comprises
Minister of Foreign Affairs Edward Nalbandian, Minister of Energy and
Natural Resources, Co-chair of the Armenian-Iranian Intergovernmental
Commission Armen Movsisyan, Minister of Transport and Communication
Gurgen Sargsyan, Minister of Diaspora Hranush Hakobyan, Minister of
Economy Nerses Yeritsyan, parliamentarians, Chairman of the Central
Bank Artur Javadyan, Executive Office of ArmRusgasprom Company Karen
Karapetyan, and other officials.

The presidential press-service reported that the presidents had a
tete a tete and then an enlarged meeting.

The sides expressed satisfaction with the current level of the
political dialogue between the two states and highlighted their
readiness for further extended inter-state relations. The two
presidents agreed that such visits and contacts at the top level
make it possible for the parties to discuss and find solutions to
many tasks on the agenda of the rich Armenian-Iranian relations.

President Sargsyan highlighted the dynamic development of relations
with Iran and considers it a reliable and the most important neighbor
and ‘a friend in hard times’. For his part, President of Iran said
developing sustainable relations with Armenia is one of Iran’s foreign
policy priorities. He came out for preservation and increase of
achievements. The parties underlined that the years-long history of
Armenian- Iranian cooperation helps maintaining peace and stability
in the region. Later Serzh Sargsyan and Iranian Majlis Chairman Ali
Larijani met. The parties highly appreciated the activity of the
Armenian-Iranian deputy group of friendship in developing relations
of the two states and peoples. As regards the programs considered at
the high level, Ali Larijani called them realistic and possible. At
the request of Ali Larijani Serzh Sargsyan presented the anti-crisis
measures of the Armenian Government. The sides touched upon regional
and international issues as well.