"Armenia: 15 Years Of Independence" Photo Exhibition Kicks Off

Armenpress
Sept 18 2006

"ARMENIA: 15 YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE" PHOTO EXHIBITION KICKS OFF

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 18, ARMENPRESS: "Armenia: 15 Years of Independence"
photo-exhibition kicked off yesterday at the "Moscow" cinema as
part of the events dedicated to the 15th anniversary of Armenian
Independence. The exhibition has been initiated and organized by the
Armenian "Armenpress" news agency.

At the exhibition photos by Martin Shahbazian, Hakob Berberian,
Ruben Mangasarian, Hrayr Baze, German Avagian, Nazik Armenakian,
Zaven Sargsian, Felix Arustamian, Alexander Khachunts, Hayk Bianjian,
Karen Minasian, Karen Mirzoyan have been presented. In parallel with
the opening of the exhibition a three-language (Armenian, French,
Russian) illustrated catalog of photos have been presented which has
been published with the funds provided by the Armenian government.

The Executive Director of "Armenpress" news agency Hrayr Zoryan
said the exhibition is a result of an open competition announced
by the Armenpress news agency. He said a panel of professional
photographers selected 109 photos by 15 photographers from 400
works by 40 photographers. The executive director also said that the
exhibition has already been held in Moscow as part of the Year of
Armenia in Russia and is included in the programs of events which
will be carried out within the framework of Year of Armenia in France.

Hasmik Poghosian, culture and youth affairs minister, said in her
opening speech that it is very pleasant when the events dedicated to
the Armenian Independence kick off by such an exhibition. "By this
exhibition we have an opportunity to see the 15 years of Armenian
Independence through the eyes of photographers and by looking at them
we remember the past 15 years," the minister said.

Deputy Culture and Youth Affairs Minister Karine Khodikian
congratulated the photographers and the organizers and noted that
by collecting pieces they gathered the 15 years of our life. "The
15 years of independence were not easy and consequently it is very
difficult to find relevant words describing them.

Nevertheless, when you watch the photos, you see what you want to
see. Moreover, years later our generations will see in this album
our way to the independence which was full of difficulties but at
the same time full of victories," Khodikian said.

Canadian Armenian photographer Hrayr Baze said the photos presented
at the exhibition are wonderful – historic faces and events, common
people and things, marvelous nature.

"During the 15 years of independence Armenia has prospered. Of course
we also had bad days but the progress is sensitive and visible,
visible in this works as well," Hrayr Baze said. The exhibition will
last until September 24.

Aliens Not Above Law

Kenya Times, Kenya

17 Sept 06

Aliens not above law

FOREIGNERS must be having good time in the country more than the
citizens. When Kenyans cry foul over the Government’s inability to
stem the wave of insecurity sweeping through the country, they
continue to be greeted with reports that certain cadres of foreigners
are armed to the teeth with arsenals that are not licensed.

And it is not just being in possession of firearms
illegally. Foreigners are using the arms to harass and endanger the
lives of Kenyans whose hospitality has enabled them to transact their
business in the country.

News that a son of the South Sudan Vice President Riek Machar was
arrested with a cache of arms, including AK-47 assault riffle, which
he used to threaten passers-by at their home demonstrates how far
foreigners have been allowed to break law in the country with
impunity.

It is even worrying that despite the arrests, the police remained
silent, obviously in a bid to cover-up the issue.

That this case comes before dust could settle down on the Armenian
brothers fiasco shows that the police is either sleeping on its job or
is an accomplice in the security glares that the foreigners cause.

We demand explanation from the Police Commissioner on the
circumstances under which Machar’s son acquired guns that he used to
terrorise innocent Kenyans outside their home. The police must also
allow the law to take its cause by arraigning the suspect in court to
face related charges.

ANKARA: Documents Shed New Light On Menderes Yassiada Trial

DOCUMENTS SHED NEW LIGHT ON MENDERES YASSIADA TRIAL
By Erdal Sen

Zaman Online
Thursday, September 14, 2006

1960 MILITARY COUP 09.15.2006 Friday – ISTANBUL 10:21

[YASSIADA ARCHIEVES MADE PUBLIC-4]

After conducting the first investigation into the Turkish premiership,
Zaman continues to shed light on historical documents.

Former Prime Minster Adnan Menderes and his fellow Democrat Party
(DP) members were tried in 14 cases in Yassiada. The result was
three death penalties; 12 life sentences and hundreds of long-term
imprisonments. There were surprising accusations made during the
11-month trial, when the evidence supporting these accusations was
presented to the court. Many interesting documents from among the
evidence evaluated by the jury during the trial have surfaced, and
includes: donation bills for mosques built in Turkey, the publication
of Qurans, renovation investments made for Eyup Sultan Mosque in
Istanbul and even private "thank you" telegrams from citizens.

The 22nd file of the case even includes a Quran.

The government had ordered printing presses from Germany to publish
Qurans in 1960.

Their goal was to export the Qurans to Muslim countries in order to
earn more foreign currency for the treasury. Former State Minister
Izzet Akcal had given the necessary instructions to the Department
of Religious Affairs. They were planning to receive the presses by
June and begin publishing the Qurans by mid-July. The proof printings
were perfect; however, these plans were never realized because of
the military coup. Even this attempt was used as evidence in the case
against the Menderes government, and it was one such accusations that
sent Menderes to his death. Some of these Quran pages, proof prints
for later publishing, were also included in the court’s 22nd file
of misconduct.

Most of the private letters sent to Menderes related to citizen’s
gratitude for the renovations works carried out at Istanbul’s Eyup
Sultan mosque. Menderes had launched an extensive project to refurbish
147 historical and religious artifacts, and of his aims in doing so was
to turn Eyup Sultan mosque into a religious center, similar to Mecca
and Medina. He first mentioned his goal in 1959, and this speech was
later used against him in court evidence of his "exploiting religious
sentiments." The court highlighted the last paragraph of Menderes’
speech, in which he said the minarets and domes of Istanbul mosques
were not only places of pray, but also masterpieces of architecture
and should be treated as such. Menderes further asserted these
masterpieces would one day be important sites to attract tourists
to Istanbul, turning the historic city into something of an open-air
museum. Some of the telegrams that citizens sent to Menderes to show
their gratitude were also included in the Yassiada files.

One of the sections that encompassed the largest volume is the file
about donations for mosque constructions. The donation statistics
of every single mosque in cities, towns and villages were documented
carefully and included in the court’s files. The number of documents
regarding such mosque donations, which were used as evidence in the
"misconduct" case, exceeds 500. The government had issued a regulation
in 1953 enabling it to set aside funds for the construction of new
mosques and renovation of historic ones. The first article of the
"misconduct" charge concerns how much money was spent for which mosque
in which year. The first article of the investigation file suggests
that the Adnan Menderes’ government spent 57,600,000 Turkish liras
on mosque construction and reconstruction during their seven-year rule.

Menderes’ Legal Defense on Sept. 6-7: Your Claim is Based on the
Greek Court

Last week marked the 51st anniversary of the Sept. 6-7 events. On
Sept. 6, 1955, violence erupted in Istanbul and Izmir and lasted
nine hours following rumors suggesting that Ataturk’s house in
Thessalonca had been bombed. Churches and workplaces were attacked,
and a number of Greek and Armenian-born citizens were killed. These
events were also handled in the Yassiada Courts established after May
27.The Democratic Party (DP) held responsible by the Greek courts
faced similar accusations five years later. For his legal defense
regarding the Sept. 6-7 events, Menderes penned his own account of
events dating back to Nov. 18, 1960. In the defense submitted to Court
of Justice High Chairmanship, Menderes criticized the Yassiada Court
for mimicking the Greek courts, and said: "We do not know whether
the only basis for the allegations that we started the Sept. 6-7
events are the ruling handed down by the Greek court or not. We also
do not know with what evidence the Greek courts used to reach this
verdict. Evidence suggests, however, that the court’s agenda was
biased. Firstly, the accusation that Turkey instigated the Sept. 6-7
events was very important in terms of the Greek national interests. We
did not have the full text relating to the Greek court’s ruling,
so we cannot defend ourselves."

Menderes’ lawyer Talat Asal, in the written defense he presented to
the court, used the term "attorney general distressed at the lack of
evidence" in reference to the Court General Attorney Altay Egesel.

Chief Judge: Stop Speaking or I will Silence you

Presiding Judge Salim Basol’s reproachful attitude during the Yassiada
trials was one of the issues most criticized by the witnesses for
the defendants. Judge Basol went down in history for his statement,
"The force that shut you up in here wants it this way," in a tone
intended to humiliate the accused. Politicians reacted harshly to the
attitude shown by Judge Basol throughout the trial, according to the
minutes of the trial. One example of protest came from Tevfk Iler as
he said: "They are trying to behead us here. Okay, let them play with
our heads, but do not let them play with our honor and chastity. They
talked about how the families were concerned for being called in for
questioning by the inquiry commission. What about our children who
have been suffering for 13 and a half months?" Minister of Finance
Hasan Polatkan asked "Should I not defend myself in a case that asks
my head?" to the Chief Judge, who did not allow him to speak.

At the Moment Lutfi Kirdar Suffered a Heart Attack

Lutfi Kirdar, namesake of the famous congress center in Istanbul,
was Minister of Health and Public Assistance at the time. He was 71
years old and suffered from a cardiac condition. "I am giving you a
detailed explanation, I do not know whether I will be able to appear
again or not," he said, offering his explanation to the judge for why
he spoke for so long ahead of the fifth hearing of the third session
in the trial for the Istanbul and Ankara events. When it was his
turn to speak, he told Judge Salim Basol about his heart condition,
and although he had been impartial while in office, Basol refused
to believe him. Kirdar was again interrupted: "Is it possible to be
impartial? Is it possible to be in the Democratic Party cabinet and
work with impartiality; can this be defended?"

Basol was insistent on questioning Lutfi Kirdar about his departure
from the Republican People’s Party (CHP), and his heart could not
stand the strain.

According to the minutes of the trial, the final dialogue between
Basol and Kirdar is as follows:

Basol: How did you join the Democratic Party?

Kirdar: I was very busy with the development of Istanbul in 1954. I
struggled against the governor and mayor in Istanbul by means of the
written press on that day but this fight was unsuccessful. They came
to me again in 1954.

Basol: Who came?

Kirdar: The Democratic Party…. Let me sit for a while…(He fell
down)

(The accused, Lutfi Kirdar, could not continue as he was having a
heart attack and was rushed out of the hall."

Basol: The court will take a ten minute break.

ANKARA: Privatisation Of The Electricity Distribution Business And I

PRIVATISATION OF THE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION BUSINESS AND ITS IMPORTANCE FOR TURKEY
Fevzi Saffet Bora

Journal of Turkish Weekly, Turkey
2006-09-12 16:57:54

Turkey has a geopolitical location on the intersection point of Asia,
Europe and Africa. Turkey is linked to the oceans through the Black,
Marmara and Mediterranean seas. It has been the center of trade
and migration routes throughout time. The Black Sea is linked to the
world via the Bosporus and Dardaneles Straits and shipping routes pass
through the Marmara Sea to reach the Mediterranean. Georgia, Armenia,
Azerbaijan and Iran on the east, Bulgaria and Greece on the west,
and Iraq and Syria on the south are Turkey’s neighbors.

Turkey is a member of international organizations such as the UN,
the Council of Europe, NATO, OECD, the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe, WTO, the Organization of Islamic Conference
(OIC), the Black Sea Economic Cooperation Organization, the Economic
Cooperation Organization (ECO). Turkey is now a candidate for full EU
membership and considered as one of the nine most important countries
which the British Government wants to establish and increase commercial
relations with.

Turkey since 1983, has been trying to undertake serious macro economic
structural reform together with its transition to deeper democracy. In
this respect, the energy sector constitutes one of the most important
areas in which structural reform takes place and serious foreign
direct investment is expected in order to inject permanent cash into
the economic system.

In this respect market liberalization activities have taken bold steps
in the last five years. As a part and complementary to these steps
privatization is viewed as the turning point in the sustainability
of the new regime in energy.

The Privatization of the electricity distribution business in Turkey is
the hot issue in the agenda right now. 20 new distribution companies
have been established from within the body of TEDAS (the Turkish
Electricity Distribution Company owned by the state) as it had been
restructured in 2004. based on geographical proximity, managerial
structure, energy demand and other technical/financial factors.

These joint-stock companies engaged in the distribution and retail
sale of electricity and provision of retail services to final customers
has approximately 28 million customers, 93 billion kWh of electricity
sales and 98% market share in electricity distribution across Turkey
according to very recent figures.

A total of 21 distribution companies are now active in electricity
distribution operations with the Kayseri and Its Surroundings
Electricity Distribution Company (already private). TEDAS is also
legally present as a holder of the network entities as well.

There are some principles which were declared to be adhered to, during
the process of the privatization of the electricity distribution
business, which were agreed upon by the relevant authorities to make
this aim worthwhile for Turkey. These are:

– The privatization will be performed by the Privatization
Administration within the framework of Law no. 4046, – Income
maximization will not be the sole aim.

– Increases in electricity prices after privatization will not be on
a permanent basis.

– Strong companies to achieve the principles of the program will be
encouraged in the privatization process, The mandatory investments
and maintenance activities will be performed independently from the
privatization process, A competitive generation structure will be
established through appropriately grouping generation assets prior to
their privatization. Seventeen hydropower plants, which total 7.055
MW of capacity will remain in government ownership, The privatization
approach will take into account existing public liabilities and will
not lead to additional state guarantees, The transmission system
and market operator, TEIAS, will remain in state ownership, Only
distribution companies are allowed to supply non-eligible consumers.

Before the starting of the tender process for distribution
privatization, there were some issues to be tackled with;

The distribution companies’ tariffs for the wire and retail businesses
were to be set through the finalization of transition contracts
between the distribution companies and the generation groups, or
transition contracts between the distribution companies and TETAS
(Electricity Wholesale Company owned by the state), and transition
contracts between the EUAS (Electricity Generation Company owned by
the state) hydro generation and TETAS.

The generation of the hydro power plants which will remain to be state
owned and under the possession of EUAS shall continue to be sold to
TETAS as long as it is deemed necessary to achieve an average TETAS
sales price that reflects the expected market price. TETAS¸ can buy
electricity at a low price from these plants to compensate for the
additional burden caused by electricity purchases at prices exceeding
the market price from the BOO (Build, Operate, Own) and BOT (Build,
Operate, transfer) schemes.

The energy purchased by TETAS through existing contracts and EUAS
generation, will be allocated among the Distribution Companies through
purchase agreements to be signed between TETAS and distribution
companies.

In case TETAS is unable to recover adequate revenues to cover its
liabilities arising from long term contracts, these excess liabilities
will be recovered through a surcharge to be added on the transmission
use of system charges.

Sales Contracts between Portfolio Generation Companies and Distribution
Companies should be put in place before distribution companies are
privatized to give the generation company groups a track record
prior to their privatization. The contracts should continue after
the privatization to assure a predictable stream of revenues in
the early years. The transitional contracts in the last two groups
will initially cover about 85% of total demand of captive consumers
in each distribution region. The rest 15% should be supplied from
private sources and the distributions companies have no more a limit
on the amount of their own generation which will be an incentive for
the investors.

The transitional balancing and settlement mechanism for the wholesale
market is forecasted to be operational in order not to prevent the
development of wholesale market.

The following corporations have been established prior to privatization
within the context of the High Planning Council Decision dated
17.03.2004 and Decree No:2004/3.

CORPORATIONS PROVINCES Akdeniz Elektrik A.Þ. Antalya, Burdur, Isparta
Ýl sýnýrlarý Aras Elektrik A.Þ. Erzurum, Aðrý, Ardahan, Bayburt,
Erzincan, Iðdýr,Kars Coruh Elektrik Daðýtým A.Þ. Trabzon, Artvin,
Giresun, Gumuþhane, Rize Dicle Elektrik Daðýtým A.Þ. Diyarbakýr,
Þanlýurfa, Mardin, Batman, Siirt Þýrnak Fýrat Elektrik Daðýtým
A.Þ. Elazýð, Bingol, Malatya, Tunceli Gediz Elektrik Daðýtým
A.Þ. Ýzmir, Manisa Goksu Elektrik Daðýtým A.Þ. Kahramanmaraþ,
Adýyaman Camlýbel Elektrik Daðýtým A.Þ. Sivas, Tokat, Yozgat Menderes
Elektrik Daðýtým A.Þ Aydýn, Denizli, Muðla Osmangazi Elektrik Daðýtým
A.Þ. Eskiþehir, Afyon, Bilecik, Kutahya, Uþak Toroslar Elektrik Daðýtým
A.Þ. Adana, Gaziantep, Hatay, Mersin, Osmaniye, Kilis Uludað Elektrik
Daðýtým A.Þ. Balýkesir, Bursa, Canakkale, Yalova Van golu Elektrik
Daðýtým A.Þ Bitlis, Hakkari, Muþ, Van Yeþilýrmak Elektrik Daðýtým
A.Þ. Samsun, Amasya, Corum, Ordu, Sinop Baþkent Elektrik Daðýtým A.Þ.

Ankara,Kýrýkkale,Zonguldak,Ba rtýn, Karabuk,Cankýrý, Kastamonu.

Boðazici Elektrik Daðýtým A.Þ Ýstanbul ili Rumeli Yakasý.

Ýstanbul Anadolu Yakasý Elektrik Daðýtým A.Þ. Ýstanbul ili Anadolu
Yakasý.

Meram Elektrik Daðýtým A.Þ. Kýrþehir, Nevþehir, Niðde, Aksaray,
Konya,Karaman.

Sakarya Elektrik Daðýtým A.Þ. Sakarya, Bolu, Duzce, Kocaeli.

Trakya Elektrik Daðýtým A.Þ. Edirne, Kýrklareli, Tekirdað.

The above mentioned companies and their tariff structures and licenses
have been approved very recently by the Energy Market Regulatory Board,
the transitional balancing and settlement mechanism for the wholesale
market and also the market management system of TEIAÞ are said to be
in place which finally provided them the possibility for readiness
for privatization by the Privatization Administration (oib.gov.tr).

The Privatization Administration has started the privatization process
with the simultaneous tender of 3 companies

a. Baskent Elektrik Dagitim A.S. ("BASKENT" Region 9) b. Istanbul
Anadolu Yakasi Elektrik Dagitim A.S.

("AYEDAS" Region 14) c. Sakarya Elektrik Dagitim A.S. ("SEDAS"
Region 15)

Privatization of distribution companies is planned to be executed
using a Transfer of Operating Rights ("TOR") backed Share Sale
model ("TSS model"). In this model, the investor will be the owner
of the shares of the company who will hold the licensee for the
distribution of electricity in the relevant region but it will not
hold the ownership of the network assets in the same region. They will
remain with TEDAS. The investor will be granted the right to operate
the distribution assets stemming from a Transfer of Operating Rights
Agreement ("TOR Agreement") with TEDAS. Under this market structure,
privatized electricity distribution companies will act as regional
monopolies with distribution licenses to be obtained from Energy
Market Regulatory Authority (EMRA).

The main purpose of this system is to achieve lower tariffs by
increasing overall system efficiency. In this respect, the tariffs
are calculated on a "cost-reflective" basis with predetermined
operating and loss/theft betterment objectives. The first tariff
implementation period (or transition period), set between 2006 and
2010, will serve as a transitory period to a fully cost based tariff
structure after 2010. EMRA recently approved the end user tariffs and
revenue requirements of each distribution company for the transition
period. Revenue requirements cover the forseen expenses for providing
distribution and retail services and leave room for financial gains
for the target level of technical and non-technical losses.

The end-user tariffs for the period after 2010 will be determined by
the distribution companies in accordance with the Electricity Market
Tariffs Communique and the related regulations and will be subject
to EMRA’s approval. The first period is aimed at having a smooth and
gradual transition from existing tariff structure to a lean and simple
tariff structure. The tariff structure is determined in compliance with
the Electricity Market Law, the Electricity Market Tariffs Communique
and other related regulations. The four basic tariff components are
(1) retail sales, (2) distribution, (3) retail services and (4)
transmission; which are regulated in an unbundled fashion. Retail
sales tariff has a "price cap" which is set as the average price
of the energy purchased by the distribution company. Distribution
and retail services have "revenue caps" which cover operating
expenses and investment requirements related to distribution and
retail services. Transmission tariff is a complete pass-through of
transmission costs as charged by TEÝAÞ.

When we decompose the end-user tariffs, we come across with the
following items in the basket:

Customers:

~U Residential ~U Commercial ~U Industrial ~U Agricultural irrigation
~U Street lightening

Retail Tariffs:

Reference Price (Energy price ) Operating margin Lost/theft component

Distribution System Usage Tariff:

Taxes and other deductions Transmission tariff Retail services tariff
Distribution OPEX component Investments, amortization and cost of
capital component TOR value component Dual-term tariffs: capacity
charge, penalty for overload and reactive energy fee

Distribution Company

Pass-through of energy costs (TETAÞ) Pass-through of transmission costs
(TEÝAÞ)

: Total end-user electricity tariff

The consumer price of electricity is subject to some levies: (1) 1%
for the Energy Fund Share; (2) 2% for Turkish Radio and Television
Corporation surcharge; (3) the aggregated amount of the two preceding
levies is then subject to the Municipality Consumption Tax (5% for
households and 1% for industrial users); and (4) 18% VAT.

Tariffs for captive customers and for wholesale by TETAS are
regulated. Under the Electricity Market Tariffs Regulation and the
related communiques, tariffs must be cost-reflective; costs not
directly related with market operations should be left out of the
equation. Direct refunds may be granted to consumers in need without
compromising the overall cost-based principle of the tariff structure
in accordance with the Electricity Market law. Once determined by
companies, regulated tariffs are subject to review and approval by
the EMRA. All tariffs are published in the Official Gazette and on
the regulator’s website to ensure transparency.

The primary benefits expected from electricity sector reform
and privatization have been determined as follows: Decreasing
of costs through effective and efficient operation of electricity
generation and distribution assets, Increasing the supply quality and
supply security in the electricity sector, Decreasing the technical
losses in distribution sub-sector to the level in OECD countries and
prevention of theft (non-technical losses), Ensuring that the required
rehabilitation and expansion investments are performed by the private
sector without creating any liabilities on the public institutions, and
Transferring to consumers the benefits obtained through competition in
generation, trade of electricity, and regulation of quality of service.

Steps that are required for creating confidence in local and
international investors shall be taken immediately by the government,
while efforts will be made to minimize the cost of transition to
liberal market model on the public institutions currently operating
in the market.

In order to ensure that there are no supply constraints during
the transition period, temporary measures shall be taken to obtain
adequate additional capacity. Such measures will be complemented with
other programs, such as imports and rehabilitation of existing plants.

The main principle will be the implementation of cost reflective
prices in the regulated electricity sectors, whereas the national
tariff practice will be operational for the first tariff implementation
period through establishment of a tariff equalization mechanism that
will prevent price differences for non-eligible consumer tariffs.

In addition to the distribution business, generation assets
that belonged to the state are going to be restructured and
privatized through grouping. In this respect the energy generation
parts (sections) of all hydroelectric power plants constructed,
commissioned or to be commissioned by State Hydraulic Works (DSI)
and the inseparable immovables of these will be transferred to EUAS
on the basis of their actual costs without paying any charges to DSI.

The generation facilities to be privatized will be identified
and grouped on the basis of two main criteria: (i) prevention of
creating market power; and (ii) financial viability. The liberal
market structure to be implemented in Turkey is based on bilateral
contracting between buyers and sellers, together with a balancing and
settlement regime. To achieve the objectives and principles of this
strategy it is essential that the balancing and settlement regime
acts as a market where uncontracted generation can be bought and
sold. This will enhance security of supply because it facilitates
participation of independent and relatively small generators.

The priorly transitionary contracts will be set at regulated
prices and will last for a maximum of 5 years, except for TETAS
contracts. As they run out such contracts will be replaced by market
priced bilateral contracts and thus, will ensure a smooth transition
to liberal market. The balancing and settlement mechanism will be
in compliance with the objective of creating a spot market and will
include price signals to attract new investments.

In accordance with the introductory themes of liberalization,
privatization and FDI; the Government of Turkey enacted a ‘Decree
on Improving the Investment Environment in Turkey" on December 11,
2001 as a part of a national strategy to increase the overall level
of income and productivity and to raise the level of competitiveness
of firms operating in Turkey.

The mentioned decree established a coordinating body called as the
‘Coordination Council for the Improvement of the Investment Environment
(CCIIE)", with the mandate to identify and remove regulatory and
administrative barriers to private investment. This is a good step in
the right direction to attract new FDI into the country rather than
hot injections of foreign currency that do more instabilization in
the Turkish economy than good as it is mainly used for arbitrage and
stock market manipulations. FDI comes into the country for good and
for more employment and better quality of life and services.

The entrance of FDI to Turkey is the most strategic of assets to
act as a powerful card for Turkey’s international relations. There
are talks of In this age of complex interdependence, the more new
and fresh FDI enter into Turkey, there will be more actors to help
Turkey defend its positions in international platforms and in the
face of international conflicts.

The privatization of the electricity distribution business is an
opportunity worth 10 to 15 Billion Dollars that must be performed
with due respect and attention to detail.

–Boundary_(ID_d4WyAVLYzzxHRg3BUSe/7w)–

South Asian-Infused London District Least ‘English’ Town: Survey

SOUTH ASIAN-INFUSED LONDON DISTRICT LEAST ‘ENGLISH’ TOWN: SURVEY

Agence France Presse — English
September 11, 2006 Monday 1:46 PM GMT

A London suburb with a large south Asian population is the least
"English" town in the country, according to a survey released Monday.

Southall in west London, was found to have the lowest proportion
of people with English surnames and first names, in a report for
OriginsInfo, which analyses where names come from.

Southall railway station is the only one in England in which the name
signs are in two languages (English and Punjabi).

A pub in the town claims to be the only one in Britain which accepts
payment in Indian rupees.

OriginsInfo’s research placed the 42.2 million adults registered to
vote in Britain into 200 ethnic groups on the basis of surnames and
first names.

South Tottenham, in north London, was found to be the most diverse
area of the British capital, according to the results.

Ripley, in Derbyshire, central England, was named the town with the
highest proportion of English names, ahead of nearby towns.

The study into the most "English" towns excluded Scottish, Irish and
Welsh names.

However, surnames dating back to the Norman conquest of England in
1066, as well as surnames from Hugenot Protestants who fled to England
from France in the 16th and 17th centuries, were classed as English.

The report also found that Armenian immigrants and their descendants to
be the most successful ethnic group in Britain, followed by Japanese,
Dutch and Greek Cypriots.

Bangladeshi Muslims and immigrants from Sierra Leone and Syria were
found to have fared the worst.

Armenian Subjects Have No Right To Visit Abkhazia And South Ossetia

ARMENIAN SUBJECTS HAVE NO RIGHT TO VISIT ABKHAZIA AND SOUTH OSSETIA
By Aghavni Harutyunian

AZG Armenian Daily
12/09/2006

Otherwise They Will Be Arrested

According to information daily Azg gathered from reliable sources,
around 100 citizens of the Republic of Armenia serve a sentence at
Georgian prisons under very curious and queer charge.

In accordance with the article 334, 2d paragraph of the Georgian Penal
Code, the first crossing of Russian-Georgian border is liable to a fine
of 2.000 USD and the second crossing can be punished by 3 to 5 years
in prison. Border crossing in this case has a uniquely Georgian and
not very safe interpretation. It transpires, that Armenian citizens
are illegally crossing Georgia’s border when they appear in Abkhazia
or South Ossetia from the Russian territory.

Following Georgian logic Armenian citizens who have in recent years
visited Abkhazia and South Ossetia through Russia and not Georgia
were outlawed. It remains unclear how could Armenian citizens go
to Abkhazia and South Ossetia via Georgia when there is no such
possibility for that. As a "sign of crime" Georgian lawmakers look
in Armenian citizens’ passports for entrance or exit stamps from
Abkhazia or South Ossetia.

In effect, it turns out that Georgia closes the road to Abkhazia and
South Ossetia for Armenian citizens.

Though the Georgian authorities explain that is applied to all
foreigners, it is still puzzling how can Armenians visit their
relatives in Abkhazia.

This method that the Georgian state practices is harmonious
with Azerbaijan’s position on visits to Nagorno Karabakh by
foreigners. Azerbaijan raised hysteria about Russian journalists and
pop singers visiting Artsakh and labels its own citizens visiting
Karabakh traitors.

Armenian Evangelical Church To Celebrate The 160th Anniversary

ARMENIAN EVANGELICAL CHURCH TO CELEBRATE THE 160-TH ANNIVERSARY

Armenpress
Sept 13 2006

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 13, ARMENPRESS: The Armenian Evangelical Church will
convene a four-day conference in Yerevan on September 14 to mark the
160-th anniversary of its foundation. Speaking to a news conference
today in Yerevan senior ministers of the Armenian Evangelical Church
from Americas, Europe and the Middle East and Rene Levonian, the head
of the World Armenian Evangelical Church Council and president of the
Armenian Evangelical Association, said there are 100,000 Armenians
in the world who follow the Evangelical Church. He said they have
150 churches across the globe.

Representatives from 22 countries have arrived in Yerevan to
participate in the gathering. They are expected to be received by
president Robert Kocharian.

The Armenian Evangelical Church was established in 1846 in Istanbul,
Turkey by a group of Armenian intellectuals advocating a deeper study
of the Bible, but a strong retaliation from the Armenian Patriarchate
of Istanbul and eventual excommunication of the reformists, the latter
were forced to organize themselves into a separate religious community,
the Protestant Millet (millet means ‘people’ in Turkish).

This separation led to the formation of the Armenian Evangelical
Church in 1846.

OSCE Concerned For Journalists In Armenia

OSCE CONCERNED FOR JOURNALISTS IN ARMENIA

Radio Free Europe, Czech Rep.
Sept 12 2006

PRAGUE, September 12, 2006 (RFE/RL) — The Organization for Security
and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) says it is "deeply concerned"
over a number of recent cases of violence and intimidation against
journalists in Armenia.

The OSCE’s office in Yerevan said in a statement issued today that
the violence infringes upon freedom of expression.

It called on the perpetrators of the attacks to be punished and
urged Armenian’s law-enforcement bodies to take "prompt measures"
to ensure the safety of those working in the media.

Item On Conflicts, Proposed By GUAM, Not To Be Included In UN GA Age

ITEM ON CONFLICTS, PROPOSED BY GUAM, NOT TO BE INCLUDED IN UN GA AGENDA

PanARMENIAN.Net
13.09.2006 15:44 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The General Committee of the 61st session of the UN
General Assembly has decided not to include document titled Protracted
conflicts in GUAM region and their consequences for international
peace, security and development in the GA agenda. During the Committee
meeting as GUAM member Ukraine and Moldova voted for involving the
document in the UN GA agenda, while Russia and Armenia were against. As
none of the Committee countries supported the initiative, the Committee
decided not to include the GUAM proposal in the GA agenda without
a vote.

No World Peace Without Religious Dialogue: Archbishop Of Tehran

NO WORLD PEACE WITHOUT RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE: ARCHBISHOP OF TEHRAN

Mehr News Agency, Iran
Sept 11 2006

TEHRAN, Sept. 11 (MNA) — Archbishop Sebu Sarkissian, the spiritual
leader of Armenian Orthodox Christians in Tehran, said here on Monday
that dialogue is an absolute necessity of the modern world.

The main objective of all divine religions is to teach people to live
better lives, Sarkissian told the Mehr News Agency.

"Since the followers of all divine religions have a strong belief
in their religious values, it is essential to hold talks between the
followers of different religions and religious denominations.

"Religious negotiations are the most important kind of negotiations
in the modern world because mutual understanding and religious
tolerance will be established between religions when they actually
become familiar with each other," he said.

Archbishop Sarkissian stated that the topic of discussion in dialogue
among religions depends on the interests of the participants in the
religious, social, political, or cultural spheres.

"Moral values are necessities of human life and religious dialogue
because these are the values that unite humans and help them understand
each other," he added.

Religious dialogue has become essential in recent years because
world peace can never be established without mutual understanding,
Sarkissian said in conclusion.