Armenian Foreign Minister Arrives In Moscow

ARMENIAN FOREIGN MINISTER ARRIVES IN MOSCOW

ITAR-TASS news agency, Moscow
5 Apr 06

Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan has arrived in Moscow on
a three-day visit within the framework of Year of Armenia in Russia,
ITAR-TASS news agency reported on 5 April. The agency quoted Russian
Foreign Ministry spokesman Mikhail Kamynin as saying that ways to step
up economic cooperation between the constituent parts of the Russian
Federation and Armenia, joint antiterror efforts, collaboration in
international organizations and within the CIS, and Nagornyy Karabakh
settlement will be on the agenda of talks in Moscow.

As regards the Nagornyy Karabakh issue, Kamynin said Russia
“believes that the Armenian-Azerbaijani dialogue should be continued
at different levels, primarily at the level of the presidents of the
two countries”. “We proceed from the fact that the parties involved in
the conflict should themselves find a mutually acceptable solution,”
he said and added that Russia is ready to mediate both on a bilateral
basis and as a co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group and become a
guarantor of the reached agreements.

World Vision Armenia Provides Essential Medical Equipment To Hospita

WORLD VISION ARMENIA PROVIDES ESSENTIAL MEDICAL EQUIPMENT TO HOSPITALS IN REMOTE REGIONS
Source: World Vision Middle East/Eastern Europe office (MEERO)

Reuters, UK
April 3 2006

Medical equipment and supplies recently donated by World Vision to
six district hospitals in Armenia are helping to improve the quality
of healthcare services in remote regions.

An infant warmer, as well as an infant suction pump were delivered
last week to Ijevan hospital in north-eastern Armenia, which urgently
needed to improve the services of the maternity ward.

These activities are part of the USAID-funded Mobile Outreach Teams
(MOT) project aimed at increasing access to medical care for people
in remote areas.

An infant warmer, as well as an infant suction pump were delivered
last week to Ijevan hospital in north-eastern Armenia, which urgently
needed to improve the services of the maternity ward.

These activities are part of the USAID-funded Mobile Outreach Teams
(MOT) project aimed at increasing access to medical care for people
in remote areas.

Currently, many district hospitals in Armenia fail to provide necessary
services to the patients because of lack of medical equipment and
poor facilities, as a result of insufficient funding.

‘Every month 30 to 40 children are born at the hospital. Because of
the lack of heating we could not maintain required temperature at the
maternity ward and had to use bottles with hot water in order to keep
the newborn babies warm,’ says Armine Dovlatbekyan, the post-natal
care doctor.

The infant warmer radiates heat and is designed to minimize heat loss
in newborns.

‘Thanks to World Vision, we now are able to ensure adequate and secure
environment for newborns. The warmer also allows to provide necessary
therapy for children with infant jaundice or premature children,’
says Narine Tumanyan, Deputy Head of the hospital. In the past,
children in need of special care often had to be taken to a hospital
in Yerevan, the capital.

In the scope of the MOT project, district hospitals in Kapan, Goris,
Noyemberyan and Chambarak received surgical instrument kits, medical
devices, reagents and other equipment.

World Vision donated a computer and delivered 40 sets of mattresses,
pillows and bedding to Tashir hospital in Lori region. According to
the hospital authorities, during the last 25 years the hospital did
not receive such items and patients had to bring their own mattresses
and bed sheets.

World Vision’s Mobile Outreach Teams regularly provide primary health
services to 45,000 people in 99 remote villages, including laboratory
tests, ultrasound examinations and referrals to district doctors.

Over the past year, World Vision carried out the renovation of 19
rural health posts and 8 district hospitals. In addition, 29 health
posts were furnished and provided with medical supplies and equipment.

[ Any views expressed in this article are those of the writer and
not of Reuters. ]

BAKU: Azeri FM To Visit U.S.

AZERI FM TO VISIT U.S.
Turan

Baku Today, Azerbaijan
April 2 2006

On April 1, 2006 Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mamedyarov will
begin a tour of South and North America.

The Foreign Ministry’s Department for Press and Information Policy
told TURAN that during his tour Mamedyarov will visit Brazil, Argentine
and the United States.

During his visit Mamedyarov plans to meet with Condoleezza Rice, U.S.

Secretary of States, to discuss a wide variety of issues, and the
situation in the region and energy field.

Mamedyarov will also touch upon the Karabakh conflict in a meeting
with Steven Mann, the U.S. co-chairman of OSCE’s Minsk Group.

BAKU: Araz Azimov On The Results Of Consultations In Washington

ARAZ AZIMOV ON THE RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS IN WASHINGTON
Turan

Baku Today, Azerbaijan
April 2 2006

On March 30, the working visit of Azerbaijan’s Deputy Minister of
Foreign Affairs, Araz Azimov, to Canada and the USA came to an end.

Besides the deputy minister of foreign affairs, the deputy minister
of national security Fuad Iskenderov, the deputy chief of the State
Frontier Service Farhad Tagizade and the commander-in-chief of the
Navy Shahin Sultanov also participated in the visit.

A dialogue on security took place on March 29 in the State
Department. Topics on the agenda included cooperation in the war
against global terror, prevention of the proliferation of weapons
of mass destruction, the strengthening of border security and
American-Azerbaijan cooperation in international organizations.

Araz Azimov gave an interview to the Washington-based correspondent
of AzerTAc about results of his visit to Northern America.

– You are the first official representative of Azerbaijan to visit
Ottawa. How interested is this country in Azerbaijan? What can you
say about the discussions that were held there?

The position of Canada in the Armenia-Azerbaijan, Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict usually is not shown distinctly enough. As a member of the
OSCE, this country till now has satisfied with only superficial moral
and political support. But gradually it is possible for Canada to more
fully involve itself in this matter. In our region, there is a number
of questions connected with Canada causing our concern: for example,
the participation of some Canadian companies in a number of illegal
projects in Turkmenistan and the participation of a Canadian company
in the development of gold mines in the occupied Kalbajar region of
Azerbaijan. We have brought these matters to the attention of the
government of Canada. But the explanations received by us have shown
that the government of Canada do not connect itself with the given
companies and tries not to interfere in these issues.

– The American-Azerbaijan dialogue on security, of which you are a
co-chairman, is a framing mechanism. What concrete projects are you
returning to Baku with after the present stage of talks?

– The dialogue on security – started in 1996 – has opened opportunities
for studying questions in the field of security between the USA
and Azerbaijan. Dialogues are necessary to strengthen this even
more. As Azerbaijan’s influence and opportunities increase, its
security threats will also increase. Azerbaijan should be ready for
this. The significant part of cooperation between Azerbaijan and
the USA concerns the military-political sphere, area of security,
and practical work in the said spheres. Though support rendered by
America to Azerbaijan in these fields is up to the mark, we have
more requirements. The attitude of America testifies that it is ready
for closer cooperation. As a whole, dialogue passes positively. The
issues on the agenda also have remained unchanged: Azerbaijan’
security at the national and regional levels, relations within NATO,
the increase of the OSCE’s role in ongoing processes, settlement of
regional conflicts, the relations among Caspian coastal states and
the military-political situation in the Caspian basin. The complex
web of risks and threats in the Caspian region is complicated enough.

Elements of war, terrorism, and the environment are peculiar to it.

In this sense, the USA will closely cooperate with Azerbaijan. We
have achieved some agreements. Groups of experts will arrive in Baku.

They will study ways to involve Azerbaijan in the initiative on
power and sea safety, and also the initiative put forward by the “G8”
against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

– Whether touch on the issues regarding Iran?

– While considering the regional situation this matter was discussed.

We have informed the United States that 130 kilometers of the said
border is under occupation. Threats originating from here should
be by all means considered. Also, conditions in the sector of the
Caspian adjacent with Iran were discussed. Some steps taken by Iran
in this area concern Azerbaijan. We have repeatedly declared that
there should be peace over the borders of neighboring countries; it
is necessary to respect these borders and observe them. We also noted
that we have various connections and trade relations with Iran, as it
is a neighboring country. Many of our compatriots live in Iran. In
this sense, Azerbaijan watches the development of situation in Iran
with great interest and concern.

The USA is directly involved in the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict. They
support a quick settlement of the conflict and are ready to make
active efforts in this direction. Many expressions are being used;
nevertheless, the situation remains the same. It is a question
of the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan, the conflict over the
Azerbaijani land and its settlement. Azerbaijan supports Armenian and
Azerbaijan communities living jointly in Nagorno Karabakh peacefully,
and granting them a corresponding guarantee. I am convinced, that at
any stage Azerbaijan will achieve this as we have no other way.

America should understand, and Armenia should remember, that the
Azerbaijan state not only will disagree with the partition of the
lands, but also will prevent it. It should not be perceived as
a toughening of our position. It is the principle position which
Azerbaijan has held from the very beginning, from first day of the
conflict. We will stick to this position. We are ready to show
corresponding flexibility in the settlement of conflict. I say
this, addressing even my compatriots living in Nagorno Karabakh,
the Armenian community should be provided by self-government in
any frameworks. According to the Armenians, the political forces of
Azerbaijan support proscription of the Armenians of Nagorno Karabakh
from this region. This is not so. We never objected to Armenians
residing in Nagorno Karabakh as citizens of Azerbaijan. On the
contrary, we believe that these people should possess corresponding
socio-political freedom, which it is necessary to provide them with.

This should not be regarded as a weakness on the part of the
Azerbaijani side. Azerbaijan, as a strong, modern and democratic
state, is ready to provide a normal life for citizens of any ethnic
origin. However, from both sides, there are extreme points. It is
necessary to reject these and come to a common denominator. The
extreme position of Armenia is based on an arguement that Nagorno
Karabakh never was and will never be a part of Azerbaijan. It is
necessary to reject this position. And the Azerbaijan government
should provide the Armenian population living in Nagorno Karabakh
with a model of self-government. Being based on European models, this
model should recognize our territorial integrity and the inviolability
of borders. It is not necessary to forget that in Nagorno Karabakh,
alongside with the Armenians also lived Azerbaijanis. The Azerbaijani
community, by all means, should return to Nagorno Karabakh. We should
provide both communities with the same models of self- governance
based on the legislation of Azerbaijan.

This is Azerbaijan’s constructive position. We are ready to pass from
such a hard line, as non-recognition of the rights of the Armenians,
to this moderate position, which includes the maintenance of their
rights. Thus, Armenia and Azerbaijan can come to a common denominator.

Money against Peacekeepers?

MONEY AGAINST PEACEKEEPERS?

Panorama.am 14:41 31/03/06

“It is very good that w have been granted money, money is never too
much, yet I’m sure the grant has political context,” announces the
head of “New Times” political party Aram Karapetyan touching upon
the 235.65 million USD granted to Armenia by Millennium War-calls
Corporation. The politician is sure that “American subdivisions will
be located near the northern border of Islamic Republic of Iran.”

The other political figure invited to the dispute member of
Armenian Republican Party, chairman of the NA Permanent Committee of
financial-credit, budget and economic affairs Gagik Minasyan finds no
political context in the American grant. “There are certain conditions
what countries can make use of the grant, the Deputy says and lists
the above conditions: a good democratic Governmental system, decrease
of corruption, formation of a normal civil society. The head of “New
Times” is sure all the above mentioned conditions are absent in our
country. /Panorama.am/

Aram Karapetyan Is Ready To Join Jirayr Sefilyan

ARAM KARAPETYAN IS READY TO JOIN JIRAYR SEFILYAN

Lragir.Am
31 March 06

Jirayr Sefilyan, The Coordinator Of For Liberated Territories NGO,
Urges To Start Deposing The Minister Of Defense Of Armenia Serge
Sargsyan. The Leader Of The Nor Zhamanakner Party Aram Karapetyan
Is Ready To Join In. “I Think The Whole Leadership Must Be Deposed.
We Have Only One Thing To Discuss With This Government: Under What
Conditions, When And How They Will Quit. This Unrest In Geopolitics Is
Becoming So Dangerous Because It Is Iranian For One Decade, American
For Another Decade, Russian For Another Decade. As A Result We Remain
Barefoot.”

And If Jirayr Sefilyan Works Out The Plan Of Fulfilling His Proposal,
Aram Karapetyan Will Join In. “If Only A Real Plan, Not Just A Piece
Of Paper, Is Worked Out To Depose Every Present Minister Of Armenia,
I Am Eager To Join. But It Has To Be Real.”

Opponents Of Normalization Of Armenian-Turkish Relations Tried To Ma

OPPONENTS OF NORMALIZATION OF ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELATIONS TRIED TO
MAKE A SCANDAL OF ARMENIA’S PARTICIPATION IN AN INTERNATIONAL FORUM
IN ANKARA

Yerevan, March 31. ArmInfo. The Participation of the Councilor to
the Armenian Defense Minister Hayk Kotanjian in an international
anti-terrorism symposium in Ankara was spoiled with an attempt of
making scandal:

Press secretary of the Armenian Defense Ministry Seyran Shahsuvarian
reported to ArmInfo that the attempt was connected with the presence
of representation of Armenian military forces at the symposium. Hayk
Kotanjian, having returned to Yerevan, says that on the second day of
the symposium he was surrounded by reporters. Previously it had been
reported that Mr. Kotanjian protested against mentioning the ASALA
(Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia) organization and
left the hall of conference, so the reporters asked him to comment
the fact. Mr. Kotanjian told the reporters that such statements are
false and insisted that the matter should be made clear with the
organizers of eth symposium. Mr. Kotanjian notes that the provocation
was welcomed by the representatives of the Turkish Army Command;
nevertheless the representative of turkey apologized about the
incident and disinformation. Hayk Kotanjian thinks that the scandal
was made by some opponents of normalization of Armenian- Turkish
relations. According to Mr. Kotanjian, the Turkish side promised to
take measures against the provocateurs and the next day a number of
Turkish newspapers published the denial of the false information.

Mr. Kotanjian also says that only one phrase in the report of the
head of the Turkish Army Command referred to ASALA: ‘Many of our
diplomats were killed by ASALA terrorists’.

Dancer In Premier UNH Show

DANCER IN PREMIER UNH SHOW
By Amanda J. Mantone/ Staff Writer

Medfield Press, MA
March 30 2006

One Medfield High School alumna will dance her way through the
roaring twenties this weekend, as a soloist in the University of New
Hampshire’s most prestigious ballet performance of the year.

Niari Keverian, a senior at UNH, has been in the school’s ballet
company for four years, and has been a dancer since the age of one –
but this is her college soloist debut, and it’s in the biggest show
of the school year, called “Intrigues.”

“Dance has been a huge part of my life. I auditioned every year
(at UNH) and I was accepted every year, but this is the first year
I’m one of the actual soloists,” she said in a recent telephone
interview. “We actually start rehearsing in September and I didn’t
get the solo part until January, so I’ve been rehearsing half the
time of everyone else. It’s a huge production and a great show.”

The show, which features ballet and jazz, is set in the 1920s in a New
Year’s Eve hotel party. Each soloist presents a different situation,
all of them intertwining in a leaping, twirling spectacle that keeps
audience members in suspense until the very end.

“They all come to a party, and all their situations come out to
play. I play the role of a sexy assassin, you could say,” Niari said.

“The suspense is that you never know what happens.”

She said the jazz component includes aerial trapezes, and there’s
also a tap dance show. There are only three soloists in the show,
which also features some duets.

Keverian is minoring in dance and majoring in marketing, a field
she hopes to enter upon graduation this year. She also dances in an
Armenian folk dance troupe based in Watertown, and as a member of that
company she and her younger brother Jack will tour Armenia this summer.

She also choreographed a student dance showcase in December at UNH,
and she’ll be in a student showcase come May, where she can show off
her individual talent and areas of expertise in ballet.

“I’m so thankful to be able to still dance in college. It’s something
I’ve been doing my whole life, and the thing that makes me the most
happy,” Niari said. “I plan on doing it until I can’t walk anymore.”

Show times are 7 p.m. nightly from Wednesday, March 29 through
Saturday, April 1, and 2 p.m. on Sunday, April 2.

Armenia Ready To Rebuff Azerbaijan’s Possible Attack At Any Time

ARMENIA READY TO REBUFF AZERBAIJAN’S POSSIBLE ATTACK AT ANY TIME

PanARMENIAN.Net
28.03.2006 21:26 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Armed Forces of Armenia are ready to rebuff the
possible attack of the adversary at any moment, Armenian Deputy MOD
Head, lieutenant general Artur Aghabekyan told journalists. In his
words, Armenia is ready to any threat by Azerbaijan or any other
state. When commenting on more frequent cases of breaks of the
cease-fire regime at the line of contact between the Armenian and
Azeri Armed Forces, Aghabekyan remarked incidents like those happened
during the entire period since establishment of the cease-fire in
Nagorno Karabakh, i.e. since 1994.

In Aghabekyan’s opinion, this is due to a number of factors, like
engineering works at the positions, more frequent aggressive statements
of official Azerbaijan.

“I can assure that in case our positions are fired upon, we will
respond in an adequate hard manner,” the lieutenant general said.

Snap Judgement: Home is where the vote is

Jerusalem Post
March 25 2006

Snap Judgement: Home is where the vote is
By CALEV BEN-DAVID

Here’s an interesting trivia question: Name at least one other
country besides Israel that does not allow absentee balloting (voting
from abroad, except for diplomatic officials) in national elections?

Need a hint? It’s another relatively small nation (population three
million) with a large diaspora community and a storied history,
bordered by hostile states in a volatile part of the world.

The answer can be found lower down. But before we get there, let’s
talk about why absentee balloting is still a bad idea for this
country, despite a recent Jerusalem Post editorial arguing otherwise.

There are indeed, as the editorial pointed out, arguments to be made
to change a policy that has existed since the founding of the state.
In the global communications age it is no longer a daunting task to
conduct an absentee ballot vote; far bigger countries than Israel,
including the US, do so without major problems. It is also true that
“as with most other developed democracies, Israel has thousands of
loyal citizens legitimately abroad for various periods of time, in
the wake of their admirably productive work in a rapidly globalizing
world.”

And yes, while once allowing absentee ballots had the stigma of
legitimizing yerida (emigration from Israel), it can be reasonably
argued that “Israel has become sufficiently established, both
demographically and economically, to not fear that an absentee ballot
would be misinterpreted as a prize for leaving.”

However that doesn’t mitigate the fact that an estimated 600,000
Israelis – roughly 10 percent of the electorate – now make their home
more-or-less permanently abroad. I’m hardly comfortable with the
notion that these expatriate Israelis could be such a decisive factor
in elections that, for example, could determine the state’s permanent
borders, and I can imagine many other resident Israelis who feel the
same.

Personally, when I moved from the US to Israel 20 years ago, I made a
decision to stop voting in American elections. In this globalized
world, it is indeed increasingly common for people to have
citizenship in more than one country; my own children hold three
different passports.

But voting is not a right of citizenship, it’s a privilege. In many
democratic societies, voter registration is not automatic (although
in this one it is) and can be limited under certain conditions (such
as for convicted prisoners). It certainly seems to me a reasonable
proposition that if one holds citizenship in a certain nation, but
has no intention of making permanent residence there, choosing not to
take part in its elections is the proper decision.

Of course, it’s not always so easy to determine whether someone is
really intending to reside permanently abroad; many Israelis
themselves don’t honestly know the answer to that question, even
after years of living away from home. At least one way then, of
testing the civic commitment of expatriates, is by demanding they
return home at least once every few years to vote in a national
election. This is presumably why countries with large diaspora
communities, such as Armenia – the answer to the above question –
have no absentee ballot.

YET EVEN if one rejects this argument, there’s another good reason
why absentee balloting is specifically a bad idea for Israel. The
problem is connected to the Law of Return, which makes it easier for
foreign Jews to obtain Israeli citizenship than immigrants to most
other countries. The Israeli expatriate community already includes
many immigrants who, for various reasons, returned to their countries
of origin, some after living here for a relatively short period of
time. In recent years there has even been growing concern that some
of these short-term olim basically exploited the Law of Return simply
to obtain the assistance given to new immigrants, before they
returned home or moved on elsewhere. If absentee balloting were
approved, it’s possible that the right to vote would be similarly
abused by Jews abroad looking to influence the ideological direction
of Israel without any intention to actually live here on a permanent
basis.

Sound far-fetched? I don’t think so. I personally know many such
people in the American Jewish community, on both the Right and Left,
who would like nothing better than having the privilege of voting in
Israeli elections, without the inconvenience of actually having to
pay Israeli taxes, serve (or have their children serve) in the IDF,
learn Hebrew, or risk getting on the same roads as Israeli drivers.

Nor can I say I blame them. Especially since there have been some
serious proposals – in one case from no less than Natan Sharansky –
suggesting that some kind of system be set up that would allow world
Jewry to take part in Israeli elections.

Even the recent PR effort “IsraelVotes,” in which American college
students took part via the Web in mock Israeli elections, seems to
suggest that it might be OK to cast a ballot here without actually
being here. “This is a chance to leverage the Israeli elections, to
use them as a way of showing off Israel’s democracy,” said one of its
promoters.

Actually, I find something profoundly anti-democratic in the notion
of foreign citizens, Jewish or otherwise, even pretending to vote in
another nation’s elections. What’s more, if voting by itself were a
mark of true democracy, the Palestinian Authority, Iraq, Syria and
Iran would all be in far better shape today.

While there may well be a way to answer all these concerns and still
allow absentee balloting, it’s probably best to just continue with
the present voting policy. I don’t relish the thought, under any
circumstances, of heated arguments over disengagement or settlements
at polling stations in Brooklyn, Los Angeles or Amsterdam. If it
really means so much to Israelis living abroad, they’ll find the
airfare to come home to cast their ballots. To quote an old saying in
a different context, “All politics is local” – so let votes about
Israel’s future borders at least be cast within the present ones.

The writer is director of The Israel Project’s Jerusalem Media
Resource Center.

www.theisraelproject.org