ABA/CEELI promotes gender equality in Armenia

ABA/CEELI PROMOTES GENDER EQUALITY IN ARMENIA

ArmenPress
Feb 17 2005

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 17, ARMENPRESS: The American Bar Association/Central
European and Eurasian Law Initiative (ABA/CEELI) presented today
the premiere of its latest video in the Alphabet of Law Series –
Gender Equality.

The Alphabet of Law Series consists of short animated public service
announcements that teach children about government, law, and individual
rights. The series can be viewed on television stations around the
country and is also used for classroom instruction throughout Armenia.

“In terms of gender equality Armenia is among the leading nations,
though it has still a lot to do to achieve absolute equality,” Lisa
Wosson, the head of ABA/CEELI Yerevan office said before the launch of
the series. “Due to their high level intellectual capacities Armenian
women have the full right to fight for absolute equality,” she added.

The animated announcements were short with the assistance of the
USAID, Armenia.

Guitarist Iakovos Kolanian To Perform March 5

Guitarist Iakovos Kolanian To Perform March 5

Fresno State News, CA
Feb 16 2005

Critically acclaimed Armenian-Greek classical guitarist Iakovos
Kolanian will make his North American debut with a performance at
California State University, Fresno on Saturday, March 5.
Additional Background

The performance at 7:30 p.m. in the Music Building Concert Hall will
be a program of Armenian folk music arranged for classical guitar. It
will include works by Komitas, A. Barrios, M. C. Tedesco, and various
Armenian folk songs.

Born in Greece, Kolanian studied at the National Conservatory of
Athens and graduated with top honors for exceptional performance. He
has toured Europe, Asia and Latin America, performing in individual
recitals and as soloist with symphonic orchestras and chamber
ensembles. He has been regularly featured on international television
and radio programs such as the BBC and Radio France.

Kolanian has served as the head of the Classical Guitar Department at
the Contemporary Athens Conservatory since 1992 and is an honorary
professor at the Armenian Academy in Yerevan, Armenia. In 2003,
Kolanian released a critically acclaimed recording of “Lute Suites”
by J.S. Bach on the Eros record label.

Tickets are $15 for adults, $8 students and children 6 and older.
Children under 6 will not be admitted. Tickets are available in
advance by calling (559) 278-2669, or at the door.

Proceeds from the concert will benefit the Armenian Studies Program
at Fresno State and the Armenian Community School of Fresno.

http://www.fresnostatenews.com/2005/02/0216-concert.htm

90th Anniversary of Armenian Genocide to considerably trouble Turkey

90-TH ANNIVERSARY OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE TO CONSIDERABLY TROUBLE TURKEY

PanArmenina News
Feb 16 2005

16.02.2005 17:14

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The 90-th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide
will cause considerable inconveniences for Turkey, editor-in-chief
of Hurriyet Turkish daily considers. At the same time he thinks
that Ankara does not attach due attention to the problem. “Annually
Armenians spend $50 million for the genocide recognition while Turks,
even the diplomats are not well informed”, the Turkish journalists
writes. He does not rule out that it may come to the returning of the
lands, which used to belong to Armenia and Turkey will lose half of
Anatolian lands. To prevent such developments the Turkish journalist
calls his compatriots “to undertake immediate measures”.

People In Armenia Are Irreplaceable

PEOPLE IN ARMENIA ARE IRREPLACEABLE

A1 Plus | 17:40:57 | 15-02-2005 | Official |

By Robert Kocharyan’s decree Stepan Poghosyan and Henrik Hovhanissyan
were appointed members of the Council of the Armenian National Radio
and Television Company for a term of 6 years.

To note the above mentioned people are not newly-appointed, they just
preserved their seats for a second term.

The Yerevan Press Club, The Union of Journalists, Internews public
organization and the Committee for Freedom of Speech Protection made
a statement regarding the contest announced for Stepan Poghosyan and
Henrik Hovhanissyan’s seats.

The statement says in part, “We state that the RA law On Radio and
Television and the practice of its implementation, including the
given contest, do not correspond to Armenia’s obligation to the CE
on transformation of state broadcasting and international standards.”

Armenian Kurds hail victory in Iraqi polls

Armenian Kurds hail victory in Iraqi polls

Mediamax news agency
15 Feb 05

Yerevan, 15 February: The chairman of the Kurdistan committee in
Armenia, Charkaz Mstoyan, said in Yerevan today that the second place
taken by the Kurdish alliance in the Iraqi elections will “favourably
reflect on the resolution of the Kurds’ national tasks and serve as
a basis for the strengthening of Armenian-Kurdish relations,” Mstoyan
said in reply to a question from our Mediamax correspondent today.

[Passage omitted: Turkish reaction to polls]

The Kurdistan committee today staged a procession through the central
streets of Yerevan in defence of the leader of the Kurdistan Workers’
Party [PKK], Abdullah Ocalan, who was arrested six years ago. Mstoyan
said that “protest actions demanding the release of the leader of the
Kurdish people will be staged today in the countries where there are
Kurdish communities”.

“We demand freedom for Abdullah Ocalan. No peace and stability can be
established in our region without a harmonic solution to the Kurdish
problem,” the chairman of the Kurdistan committee said.

Russian company buys Armenian power grid

Russian company buys Armenian power grid

Gateway 2 Russia, Russia
Feb 15 2005

In November last year Regnum news agency reported about talks between
the British trade and industrial concern Midland Resources Holding Ltd
and the RAO UES (Russia) [Russia’s power grid monopoly Unified Energy
System] on the sale of the Armenian power grid. The press secretary of
the Armenian power grid, Margarita Grigoryan, officially denied reports
from a well-informed source in the company that the Russian holding
would become the owner of the Armenian power grid in January 2005.

Meanwhile, Yerevan-based newspaper Aykakan Zhamanak reported on 12
February that a subsidiary of the RAO UES of Russia, Inter RAO UES,
has bought the Armenian power grid from Midland Resources for 80m
dollars. The deal will be officially made public in April 2005, the
newspaper noted. Aykakan Zhamanak noted that the World Bank is roundly
against handing over the Armenian power grid to Russia. The newspaper
also alleged that “after the sale of the Armenian power grid, Russia
will not be the only one to control them”. [Sentence as published]

To recap, an agreement on the sale of the Armenian power grid was
signed in Yerevan on 26 August between the Armenian government and
the British trade and industrial concern Midland Resources Holding
Ltd. In accordance with the document, 80.1 per cent of the Armenian
power grid shares were sold to the concern for 37.15m dollars. The
British company was to pay 12.15m dollars for the shares and to
allocate another 25m dollars to the Armenian budget to cover the
Armenian power grid’s debts and to pay wage arrears.

The RAO UES of Russia owns the Sevan-Razdan cascade of hydro-electric
power plants and the Razdan thermoelectric power plant and controls
finances of the Armenia Nuclear Power Plant. The RAO UES set up the
International Energy Corporation closed-type joint-stock company in May
2003 for the management of the Sevan-Razdan cascade of hydro-electric
power plants, which was handed over to Russia to cover part of the debt
for the nuclear fuel delivered for the Armenian Nuclear Power Plant.

Finances of the Armenian Nuclear Power Plant have been placed in
trust management of Inter RAO UES, a subsidiary of the RAO UES,
(60 per cent of shares) and Russia’s state nuclear power holding
Rosenergoatom (40 per cent) for five years.

Probably, the sale of the Armenian power grid should be viewed in
the context of the RAO UES’ attempt to synchronize the power grids
of the entire region, including Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Taking account of the fact that after the commissioning of the
Iran-Armenia gas pipeline, Armenia will export electricity to Iran
in exchange for the supplied gas, which is outlined in the major
agreement, the issue of synchronizing the Armenian and Iranian power
grids could also emerge on the agenda. Since the RAO UES is also the
owner of Georgia’s major power facilities, one can say that the RAO UES
is striving to synchronize the work of the power grids of the whole of
the region, including Armenia, Georgia and even Turkey in the future.

Source: Regnum, Moscow

From Auschwitz To Darfur

FROM AUSCHWITZ TO DARFUR

Bangkok Post – Thailand
Feb 13, 2005

In two years of mass killings and forced population displacements,
Sudan and its Arab Janjaweed militias have caused the deaths of over
200,000 Africans in the country’s Darfur provinces. Though existing
international law already provides both a relevant statutory definition
of genocide and a court to judge these crimes, needless semantic
disputes are hampering effective punishment and deterrence. Failure
to promptly bring those responsible before the International Criminal
Court (ICC) could render the international community helpless onlookers
_ and would further encourage such crimes.

Despite persistent reports of attacks on Africans in Darfur, military
intervention has been slow. The African Union peacekeeping force is
small. Guarding their own sovereignty, few African or Arab governments
will intervene in a regional Islamic state, or prosecute its crimes. US
intervention, with American forces extended in Iraq and elsewhere,
seems unlikely. Washington favours a genocide tribunal, in a special
court restricted to hearing the Darfur case. It opposes the new
permanent ICC, which one day might try US war crimes.

Differing definitions of genocide plague the legal response. A United
Nations commission, urging referral of the case to ICC prosecutors,
recently found that crimes against humanity and war crimes are
occurring in Darfur. The commission avoided charging Sudanese
government officials with genocide _ the most heinous crime against
humanity _ stating that “only a competent court” can determine if
they have committed “acts with genocidal intent.”

Meanwhile, the US government, the German government, the Parliament of
the European Union, the US Holocaust Museum’s Committee on Conscience,
and Yad Vashem, all accuse Khartoum of “genocide”.

Why this debate over the definition of genocide? Although the concept
of genocide preceded the invention of the term, the jurist Raphael
Lemkin coined the term “genocide” in his 1944 classic Axis Rule in
Occupied Europe. Warning of what we now call the Holocaust, he cited
previous cases, particularly the 1915 Armenian genocide perpetrated
by the Ottoman Young Turk regime. Lemkin thought that the term should
denote the attempted destruction not only of ethnic and religious
groups, but also of political ones, and that it encompassed systematic
cultural destruction as well.

The 1941-45 Nazi genocide of Jews and Gypsies constitutes not just
the most extreme case of genocide; it differs from previous cases _
the conquistadors’ brutality in the New World or nineteenth-century
Ottoman massacres of Armenians _ in an important respect: The Holocaust
was one of the first historical examples of attempted physical racial
extermination. On a smaller scale, this fate had already befallen a
number of indigenous peoples in the Americas, Africa, and Australia _
and later, the Vietnamese minority in Cambodia, and Tutsis in Rwanda
in 1994. By then, planned near-complete annihilation of a people had
become the colloquial meaning of “genocide”.

Yet the postwar United Nations Convention on the Prevention and
Punishment of Genocide adopted Lemkin’s broader concept, which
encompasses the crimes in Darfur. Ratified by most UN member states,
the 1948 Convention defines genocide as acts committed “with the
intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial,
or religious group, as such.” It includes even non-violent destruction
of such a group. While excluding cultural destruction and political
extermination, the Convention specifically covers removal of children,
imposing living conditions that make it difficult to sustain a group’s
existence, or inflicting physical or mental harm, with the intent to
destroy a group “as such”.

Australia’s Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission found in
1997 that the UN definition of genocide applies to the removals of
Aboriginal children from their parents to “breed out the color” _
as one Australian official put it in 1933. The law thus expands the
popular understanding of genocide. As in the case of Darfur, genocide
may fall well short of total physical extermination.

UN definition is best

While some scholars use the term more broadly, to include destruction
of political groups, the legal recourse now available to victims under
international law is a good reason to accept the 1948 UN definition. In
2003, Sudan acceded to the Genocide Convention (which the US ratified
in 1988). It is statutory international law, binding on 136 states. In
the past decade, UN tribunals for Bosnia and Rwanda have prosecuted and
convicted genocide perpetrators from both countries. The Convention’s
definition is enshrined in the statute of the ICC, created in 2002
and ratified by 94 states.

The legal definition is broad in another sense, too. In criminal law,
the term “intent” does not equal “motive”. One of Hitler’s motives for
the construction of Auschwitz was to destroy the Jews directly, but
other genocide perpetrators have pursued different goals _ communism
(Stalin and Pol Pot), conquest (Indonesia in East Timor), “ethnic
cleansing” (in Bosnia and Darfur) _ which resulted in more indirect
cases. If those perpetrators did not set out to commit genocide, it
was a predictable result of their actions. The regimes pursued their
objectives knowing that at least partial genocide would result from
their violence: driving Muslim communities from Bosnia or Africans
from Darfur, crushing all national resistance in East Timor, imposing
totalitarian racism in Cambodia. When such policies, purposefully
pursued, knowingly bring genocidal results, their perpetrators may
be legally judged to have possessed the “intent” to destroy a group,
at least “in part”, whatever their motive. Such crimes are not the
same as the Holocaust, but international law has made them another
form of genocide.

The 1948 Convention also outlaws complicity, incitement, conspiracy,
and attempt to commit genocide. A government could commit those crimes
by facilitating an ongoing genocide against indigenous people. Darfur
may include such cases of official complicity with the Janjaweed
militia attacks. In colonial Australia, British authorities did not set
out to exterminate Aborigines, but some police and settlers did. Nor
did US federal officials adopt such a goal in California and the West,
though some state governments and bounty-hunting posses did. Yet courts
in both countries prohibited testimony by native people. Such official
policies and their deliberate, sustained enforcement facilitated or
resulted in the predictable genocide of a number of Aboriginal and
Native American peoples.

Complicity, discrimination, and refusal of legal responsibility to
protect threatened groups continued in the twentieth century. Even
after World War II, the UN Security Council failed to enforce the
1948 Genocide Convention until the crime recurred in Europe. By then
genocides had proliferated elsewhere. A few independent scholars
inspired by Lemkin had long been working to broaden understanding
of the phenomenon beyond the Holocaust. Most scholars now include
the Armenian, Bangladeshi, Cambodian, East Timorese, Guatemalan,
Sudanese, and other cases, along with those of Bosnia and Rwanda.

Attention has also turned to indigenous peoples. A German official
recently apologised to the Herero people of Namibia for Berlin’s
genocidal conquest of Southwest Africa in 1904-05. The United States
and Australia have yet to acknowledge earlier genocides against their
indigenous inhabitants, but now the Muslim Africans of Darfur have
a legal remedy.

After a century of genocide, resistance, and research on the
phenomenon, the world community has a legal definition, an
international statute outlawing the crime, and a court asserting
jurisdiction over it. The task now requires less definitional
disputation, more investigation, rigorous enforcement, and compensation
for the victims.

Unless either the Sudanese government invites the ICC or the UN decides
to send the case before the ICC there is risk that the Darfur crimes
will go unpunished. Lest international efforts to prevent genocide
disintegrate into empty talk, the ICC should be allowed to take up
the case of Darfur.

Ben Kiernan is the A.Whitney Griswold Professor of History
and Director of the Genocide Studies Program at Yale University
(). He is the author of “How Pol Pot Came to Power”,
and “The Pol Pot Regime” (Yale 2002, 2004). This article is reprinted
with permission from YaleGlobal Online ().

http://yaleglobal.yale.edu
www.yale.edu/gsp

Antelias: The Armenian National Sanatorium of Azounieh continues toc

PRESS RELEASE

Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department
Contact: V. Rev. Fr. Krikor Chiftjian, Communications Officer
Tel: (04) 410001, 410003
Fax: (04) 419724
E- mail: [email protected]
Web:

PO Box 70 317

Antelias-Lebanon

Armenian version:

THE ARMENIAN NATIONAL SANATORIUM OF AZOUNIEH
CONTINUES TO CARRY OUT ITS MISSION

The board of trustees of the Armenian National Sanatorium started during the
last few months to introduce reforms to improve the living conditions and
medical care of the sanatorium’s patients.

The board kept its good relations with the institutions supporting the
sanatorium. Simultaneously, it sought the support of the Ministry of Health
and charity organizations in order to carry out the reforms. The medical
team and staff of the sanatorium were revised and reformed.

The Armenian National Sanatorium in Azounieh functions under the patronage
of the Armenian Apostolic and Evangelical Churches and is constantly the
center of attention of the heads of both churches, His Holiness Aram I and
Reverend Megerditch Karageozian. Since 1929 the institution has provided
shelter for needy Armenian patients. It is one of the best examples of the
social services carried out by the church.

The financial donations and the gifts that were offered to the sanatorium
were uplifting for both the board of trustees and the patients. In light of
the sanatorium’s needs, however, all Armenians are expected to contribute to
the efforts of sustaining the institution.

##

The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia is one of the two Catholicosates of
the Armenian Orthodox Church. For detailed information about the history and
the mission of the Cilician Catholicosate, you may refer to the web page of
the Catholicosate, The Cilician Catholicosate, the
administrative center of the church is located in Antelias, Lebanon.

http://www.cathcil.org/
http://www.cathcil.org/v04/doc/cathcilnews.htm#11
http://www.cathcil.org/

Opposition Still Boycotting Armenian Parliament

Institute for War & Peace Reporting
Feb 9 2005

Opposition Still Boycotting Armenian Parliament

President’s supporters appear unconcerned as two factions continue
boycott in support of a referendum to oust him.

By Mariam Levina in Yerevan (CRS No. 273, 09-Feb-05)

As Armenia’s parliament opened for business on February 7, the
opposition declared an extension of its now year-long boycott.

The two opposition factions, Justice and National Unity, first
announced a walk-out in February last year after the National
Assembly turned down a proposed change to the law that would have
allowed a nationwide referendum to be held on Robert Kocharian’s
presidency.

Using a confidence referendum as a tool to oust the president has
long been a goal of the opposition alliance, which controls just 24
of the 131 parliamentary seats. The opposition claims that Kocharian
won the 2003 presidential election, and his supporters swept the
board in a parliamentary poll the same year, only by fixing the
results.

Viktor Dallakian, a member of the Justice group, told IWPR that the
opposition would not back down since the Armenian supreme court
ruling had ruled in favour of a referendum.

“Given that parliament was elected through rigging, our participation
can have no real meaning,” he said. “But if people think they can
exploit us as a mere decoration, to show that the Armenian parliament
has an opposition, then they will not succeed.”

“There can be no talk of ending the boycott as long as the reasons
for it are not removed,” said Stepan Demirchian, a leading opposition
figure who heads Justice.

“To this day, those who falsified the presidential and parliamentary
elections have not been punished. Neither have those who beat
peaceful demonstrators in April last year. This clearly shows that it
is the authorities who stand behind all the lawlessness.”

Demirchian said that his allies would still take part in vital
debates, as they did when parliament was voting on whether to send a
small contingent of troops to Iraq.

The opposition is prepared to debate matters such as constitutional
issues, but more than 40 other bills, some of them authored by the
opposition itself, may end up being ignored.

The pro-government speaker of parliament, Artur Bagdasarian, remained
optimistic, calling 2005 a year of “parliamentary accord”.

But disagreement has already arisen even in those areas which all
parties are in principle happy to debate.

Just before the spring session opened, Justice and National Unity
made it clear they were prepared to debate a proposed set of
constitutional reforms, but said they wanted to see changes to
national and local government and the court system placed top of the
agenda.

The ruling coalition saw this proviso as an ultimatum. “We don’t need
any favours from them,” said Republican faction leader Galust
Saakyan. “Constitutional reform is of national importance. The
opposition must make up its own mind whether or not to take part.”

Demirchian defended the opposition’s stand, insisting there was no
ultimatum.

He described the ruling coalition’s current plans for constitutional
reform as worse than a package of proposals that was rejected in a
2003 referendum.

The parliamentary opposition shows no sign of letting up on its
boycott of day-to-day legislative business.

But according to political analyst Aleksandr Iskandarian, head of the
Caucasus Media Institute, the current opposition is so weak that “a
fundamentally new movement must be established”.

Talks are now under way on a new opposition bloc that would bring
together Armenia’s first post-Soviet foreign minister, Raffi
Ovanesian, former premier Aram Sarkisian, and Ovannes Ovanesian,
chairman of the Liberal Progressive party. Ovanesian says the idea is
to create a pro-Western coalition.

For the established opposition, Demirchian says talk of new alliances
is just hot air, and he denied that his colleagues are in disarray,
saying, “the bloc has been and is functioning, and it is in a
position to accomplish the tasks facing it”.

Aram Karapetian, leader of the New Times party, believes Armenia has
neither an opposition nor a true ruling coalition, “There is a
president who more or less carries out his obligations, and there are
the people who live far away.

“Between them there’s a vacuum which so far no one has been able to
fill – not the government and not the parliament.”

If Karapetian is right in suggesting the established political
groupings – pro- and anti-president alike – are unresponsive to their
electorate, few observers are predicting that this could lead to a
popular uprising resulting in regime change of the kind seen in
Georgia and more recently Ukraine.

“There is no revolutionary situation in Armenia and it is senseless
to talk about it,” Mger Shakgeldian, the deputy chairman of the
pro-government Country of Law (Orinats Erkir) party, told IWPR.

The leader of the pro-government faction Dashnaktsutyun, Levon
Mkrtchian, said there could be “no velvet revolution in Armenia,
because there aren’t the conditions for it”.

Mariam Levina is a journalist at the independent Arminfo agency.

–Boundary_(ID_oSJ2HuyHMS7Kzu09WLJijA)–

Anxiety in the UK

EducationGuardian.co.uk, UK
Feb 8 2005

Anxiety in the UK

Serious complaints by overseas students are unjustified, says their
university. Hsiao-Hung Pai reports

Tuesday February 8, 2005
The Guardian

About 400 students from east Asia have enrolled for programmes this
year at Royal Holloway, University of London. They are paying at
least three times the fees of UK students, but came because they
regarded it as a prestigious place to study. But following a series
of what appear to be racially motivated assaults, several students at
the campus in Egham, Surrey, have expressed concerns about security,
accommodation, and what they describe as a culture of isolation
within the college. These claims are vociferously denied by Royal
Holloway.
A Korean female postgraduate exchange student was attacked by three
youths – one man and two women – inside a college laundry room at the
main campus in November, 2004. They verbally abused her and hit her
continuously for half an hour, till she fell on the floor. Then they
started kicking her. She was left with bad injuries and bruises all
over her face.

“There is no security system at this university,” said Mr Jin,
president of the Korean society, who asked us not to publish his
first name. The incident provoked great anger among east Asian
students and overseas students in general. The Korean society, along
with the Chinese society, Japanese society, Taiwanese society and the
Indian society, presented a petition with 400 signatures to the
college, demanding that a satisfactory security system be installed,
with better lighting on campus and an increased patrol.

“In the first two weeks, patrolling increased. But things got back to
usual after that,” said a Korean student who doesn’t want to be
named.

Advertiser links
Life Coaching Service
By visiting this Web site you have already taken the first…

realcoachingco.com

Take an ICS Life Coaching Course
The ICS Life Coaching course will help you learn different…

icslearn.co.uk

Become a Coach Today
Achieve accredited coaching success in corporate, executive…

the-coaching-academy.com
Two months later, on January 28, a Chinese-German student was
attacked by 10 youths at the south gate, outside the college grounds.
On the same night, an Indian student was attacked.

“The college could have done better on informing students about the
attacks,” said Zepyur Batikyar, an Armenian MA student. “We got to
hear of them mostly from other students.”

“We feel extremely excluded by our skin colour,” said Yu-Jen Bai, a
postgraduate business student from Taiwan, “We almost feel we can
only be protected by the presence of a white student.”

Royal Holloway emphatically denied it had responded inadequately to
the attacks. All the students have been offered support and
counselling since the attacks, a spokeswoman said.

“The incident involving a Korean student was taken very seriously,
and subjected to a full investigation in collaboration with Korea
University, [the] students’ union, the local community and local
police. The college has also provided ongoing support for the student
involved.

“The student support officer, who has been working closely with the
Korean student involved in this incident, has received much gratitude
for the care and support, and we understand the student is hoping to
return to Royal Holloway for further study.”

After the November attack, the spokeswoman said, a bulletin was
issued by the students’ union alerting students. “Lighting systems
throughout the campus were reviewed and the level of patrol by
security officers was increased to cover additional areas on the
campus, in particular, those close to halls of residences, and
arrangements for these patrols were continued through the vacation
period. In addition, the college is working closely with the local
community and police to seek ways to ensure that all members of the
community continue to work and live in a safe and secure
environment.”

It was “totally inaccurate” to say the college had no security
system. “Each of the halls of residence has a resident warden to
support students and the college operates 24-hour security presence.”

Students, particularly east Asian students, feel fearful of these
attacks and are deeply concerned that something should be done. But,
according to Jin, they have no proper channels of complaint and are
worried that too much noise would have a negative effect on their
status at college.

“There is practically no means of communication between overseas
students and the college authorities,” said a Taiwanese MBA student.

Royal Holloway’s spokeswoman said: “This could not be further from
the truth. The college prides itself on its level of pastoral care.”

Yuki Yanagi, a 22-year-old postgraduate student from Japan, says that
the attack in November “is not just a Korean issue. To the eyes of
locals, we look similar and I feel the same thing could happen to me
or my friends.

“I have become very cautious. Nowadays I only do shopping in the
daytime and in British, male company.” My parents are worried about
me.”

Safety has, in fact, been a long-term concern. “Incidents of attacks
and harassment have been going on here for at least two years. MBA
students who studied here in 2003/04 warned me about safety the first
day I got here,” said Yu-Jen Bai. “There should have been stronger
action from the students themselves. I never imagined safety to be a
problem at London University.

“The problem is our student societies are only interested in
organising social events. They aren’t interested in fighting for our
rights. I guess it’s because they are run by younger people,
undergraduates, who aren’t very aware.”

The students suffer from being both separate and visible. “Life is
isolated and lonely here,” says Sangseuk Park. Like many other east
Asian students, Park chose to study at Holloway because of its
excellent international reputation. “And the campus looks so nice,”
he said. He is self-funded and pays a tuition fee of £8,500 for a
one-year course.

Park finds language a barrier. He only socialises with east Asian
students. “It’s not so easy to interact with local students. Perhaps
it’s cultural differences.”

“It isn’t always language that is the barrier,” says Zepyur Batikyar.
“Self-blame was my initial reaction when I experienced distance from
the local environment. But I understood it wasn’t me at all when I
began to interact so well with other overseas students.”

“We don’t go out much. Our weekend entertainment is going to the
cinema in Staines with other Chinese students,” says Gu Chen, 24, a
Chinese postgraduate in Business Information Systems.

Yuki Yanagi came to this college for its reputation in women’s
studies. She’s eager to be socially active and learn about local
culture. She joined the women’s football team where there are hardly
any Asian players, and went to watch the football in the local pub.

“But the best time of my stay in Royal Holloway was when I met east
Asian students. We socialise a lot and I feel things are getting
better and better.”

She’s disappointed with the level of interaction between overseas and
local students. “I often have racially abusive jokes thrown at me by
fellow students, and some of the sexually harassing behaviour really
disgusts me.”

Pei-Ling Lu, a business postgraduate from Taiwan, says: “We didn’t
really know that much about the course structure or the environment
before we came, because all the information was provided by agencies
at home, who gave us nothing but college brochures.”

All the east Asian students we spoke to talked about the
administrative inefficiency of the college. “Our requests are often
ignored or delayed,” one said.

Accommodation is also one of the biggest concerns among overseas
students here. “There is a large difference in the types of
accommodation we get, and the criteria of housing distribution seems
arbitrary,” said one student.

“There’s no support for overseas students here,” said Gu Chen. “We
believe that overseas students tend to be given poorer-facilitated
housing. The course is also very different from what I had expected.
It’s loosely organised, and the teaching hours are too short – only
two days a week.”

The postgraduates on the business courses seem particularly unhappy
with what they get in return for the high tuition fees. “The college
facilities are commercialised,” one MBA student said. “There are bars
run by outside companies, which charge higher prices than local pubs.
But there aren’t enough academic resources, such as a good library.
This is only geared towards undergraduate interests.”

The college denied these charges. “International students are given
priority in securing accommodation within halls of residence. In the
case of a large group of students, such as those from Korea
University, we also work to accommodate them across the campus, to
enable them to integrate more fully within the campus community,”
said the spokeswoman.

“We consider our accommodation standards to be high – situated in a
135-acre parkland campus. Royal Holloway opened a brand new £23m
state-of-the-art halls development in September 2004. Many
international students are within these halls. Indeed, we have a
collaborative venture with Korea University, and a section of the
halls have been named in honour of a Korean industrialist.”

She added: “We have many channels in operation to receive feedback
from students. Standards of teaching at the college are frequently
praised by students, and the college’s record demonstrates our high
commitment to teaching and research.”

–Boundary_(ID_V5v4W7nYXSALM7XPmQ0y5g)–