Soccer: Slovakia overcome improved Armenia

Slovakia overcome improved Armenia

UEFA.com, Europe
May 22 2004

Slovakia are one victory from qualifying for the UEFA European
Under-19 Championship final after a 1-0 victory eliminated Armenia.

Final showdown
The second qualifying round Group 3 hosts will meet leaders Germany,
who defeated Portugal by a single goal today, on Sunday morning.
Germany’s superior goal difference means that Slovakia must win the
match in Trnava.

Wet conditions
Despite thunder and heavy rain in Bratislava just prior to kick-off,
today’s match was played in bright sunlight, although the surface was
wet and tricky to master. Slovakia began in dominant fashion, but
were then surprised by the skill of Armenia, showing five changes to
the team that had lost 5-0 to Germany on Wednesday.

Armenian efforts
In the 20th minute, two Armenia players with Cameroonian origins –
Carl Lombe and Balep Ndoumbouk – set up Edgar Manucharyan, but the
pacy striker hit his shot just wide. Manucharyan then fed Mkhitar
Grigoryan, but his effort was deflected away, as was a similar change
for Lombe. Manucharyan was sent through one-on-one with Slovakian
goalkeeper Dusan Kuciak, but the custodian produced a one-handed
save.

Lombe dismissed
After the break, Armenia began to tire on the heavy pitch, and the
group hosts, who beat Portugal 2-1 two days ago, took control. Adam
Nemec headed just wide and Armenian goalkeeper Edel Bete did well to
save from Michal Farkas’s long-range shot. Just before the hour Lombe
was cautioned twice in three minutes for foul tackles and was
dismissed.

Basista winner
With an extra man, Slovakia pushed further forward, and Bete tipped
Nemec’s headed over. However, Bete could do nothing to stop Peter
Basista’s strong right-footed shot on 66 minutes following Matej
Ižvolt’s run and cross from the right. After that only good
goalkeeping from Armenia’s No1 kept the lead to one goal.

‘Fine chances’
Slovakia coach Ivan Hucko admitted he was impressed by Armenia before
the break. “Yes, they made a lot of changes to the team, but we knew
they are strong and expected a difficult game,” he said. “Manucharyan
is an excellent striker and had two fine chances – which could have
made things very different.”

‘Tough games’
He added: “Fortunately we were physically stronger and managed to put
some pressure on them after the break. It is very difficult for young
players to play two tough games in three days and now we only have on
day to recover before an important match against Germany.”

Portugal meeting
Armenia meet Portugal on Sunday morning, needing victory against the
2003 finalists, who are also eliminated, to avoid finishing bottom of
the group.

Russian DM says radar station for Russian military use only

Russian defense minister says radar station for Russian military use only

Associated Press Worldstream
May 20, 2004 Thursday

YEREVAN, Armenia — Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov said
Thursday that there are no plans to let the United States use its
Soviet-era radar station in Azerbaijan.

“I don’t foresee that,” Ivanov said, after arriving in the Armenian
capital, Yerevan, for a two-day visit. “Even if I had a rich
imagination, I couldn’t foresee that. This station is for the sole
use of the Russian military.”

The Gabala radar station was built by the Soviet military to track
missiles in the southern hemisphere. After the Soviet collapse,
Azerbaijan – which shares a border with Iran to the south – grudgingly
allowed Russia to continue using the station, which is considered a
key part of Russia’s early warning system.

Azerbaijan has sought to develop a good military relationship with
Washington, leading to rumors – denied by U.S. officials – that the
U.S. military might establish a base there.

Meanwhile, Ivanov said that Russia is pleased with its military
relationship with Armenia, which is host to one Soviet-era military
base. Ivanov noted that two Russian Il-76 cargo planes, purchased by
Armenia at internal Russian prices, arrived in the ex-Soviet republic
on Thursday, and that 600 Armenian soldiers were currently studying
in Russian military academies.

Armenia has historically looked to Russia as an economic and political
strategic partner. Their relationship has sometimes angered Azerbaijan,
with which Armenia fought a war over the Nagorno-Karabakh enclave.

BAKU: To identify aggressor & victim of aggression impossible

AzerTag, Azerbaijan State Info Agency
May 20 2004

TO IDENTIFY AGGRESSOR AND VICTIM OF AGGRESSION IMPOSSIBLE
EXECUTIVE EDITOR OLEXIY SOLOHUBENKO STATES THAT BBC IS TRUE
IMPARTIALITY
[May 20, 2004, 23:30:13]

The materials distributed recently on the BBC radio in connection
with the 10th anniversary of the announcement of cease-fire in the
aggressive war which Armenia conducts against Azerbaijan, have caused
sharp protest in the public of our Republic. The executive editor
of the program of the world service of radio Oleksiy Solohubenko has
sent to the embassy of Azerbaijan in the Great Britain a letter with
the answer to the criticism addressed in this connection to the BBC.

In the said reciprocal letter, which was received by AzerTAj from
the embassy, deep concern is expressed in connection with accusation
of the BBC that it takes the pro-Armenian position in the reporting
concerning the Nagorny Karabakh question. O. Solohubenko states:
“Sounding in the numerous letters of students and readers from Baku
accusations for BBC that it takes the pro-Armenian and anti-Azerbaijan
position, puts under doubt the principle of “fidelity to impartiality”
of our radio that has caused in us serious concern”.

The executive editor writes: “We understand painful perception by
Azerbaijan undergone occupation where one million people live in
the position of refugees and IDPs, and by the Azerbaijanis, both
the press and radio-television materials concerning Nagorny Karabakh
conflict, therefore, in the reporting on the conflict we, too, try to
be sensitive. We have closely listened and have analyzed the reporting
caused serious protest at our Azerbaijan auditory. Sounded in lips
of the author of the reporting the statement – “We are in the main
city of the so-called “republic”, which has not been recognized by
any country of the world, even Armenia” serves as the weighty proof
of our position. As if to arrival of our correspondent in Khankendi
on the Yerevan route, here, there was no political ground, it is only
technical question and as it seems to me while it is unique way of
travel to the occupied region.

Further, in the letter it is stated: “In the Azerbaijan language,
we alongside with other questions have included the protest action
carried out in Moscow in the reporting in connection with occupation
of Shusha, articles from textbooks of history and the statement
of teachers about events in Baku and Yerevan, have carried out
conversations with various politicians, including representatives
of the Karabakh Liberation Organization, have interviewed also such
known Azerbaijan writers, as Anar, Samadoglu and Aylisly, and the
representative of the Council of Europe.

In the reporting in English, we have received the information directed
on attraction of attention of our correspondent in Baku to inflow of
refugees to Azerbaijan. In the first sentence of the said material it
is stated: “As a result of the conflict, 30 thousand people were lost
and about 1 million – have been ousted from their homelands. Karabakh
and the seven adjacent regions once included in the Soviet Azerbaijan,
now are under the control of Armenia, therefore, Azerbaijan appeared
on the first place in the world with the largest refugee population
per capita of any country in the world.

It is necessary to note also, that unlike Baku, in Yerevan there is
no English-speaking correspondent of the BBC, therefore, we have
not received from Yerevan any material in English. We recognize,
that some Azerbaijanis whom we have interviewed in our reporting,
could be more frank and are wider represented in our program. We
shall hold this question in sight.

It is the BBC’s job to provide coverage of events on the Southern
Caucasus, as well as in other regions of the world, impartially,
accurate, fairly and balanced, openly to reflect the position of all
layers of society. We are trusted just for this reason. And we during
the present, extremely important time do not want to lose this trust”.

The executive editor ends the letter with the following ideas:
“The BBC thinks much of its presence in Azerbaijan and numerous
listeners in this country. We also think much of the atmosphere of
tolerance and openness concerning mass media created in Azerbaijan
as against other countries, hoping, that adherence to this tradition
will be kept even in case of explosion of emotions. The BBC remains
your reliable partner”.

Ð.S. Not calling any doubt in sincerity of statements in the letter
of the executive editor of the BBC, we want to remind one more
moment: to observe balance when the question is about still unsolved
problem between Armenia and Azerbaijan, as a matter of fact results
in injustice as despite of the sensation lifted by the Armenians,
the validity consists that the Azerbaijan lands were occupied, as
a result of military aggression in the country appeared one million
refugees and IDPs. Armenia is a state-aggressor.

Therefore, in the said question, first of all it is necessary to be
objective from the historical-political point of view, and also from
the point of view of only human attitude, and to put an equal sign
between the aggressor and its victim is unfair.

Gazprom Ready to Run Chechen Business

Gazprom Ready to Run Chechen Business
By Valeria Korchagina, Staff Writer

The Moscow Times
Wednesday, May 19, 2004. Page 5.

As the federal government seeks quick solutions to revive the Chechen
economy, Gazprom has said it is prepared to join the relief effort
by adding Chechengazprom to its vast holding.

The move appears to be aimed at stopping gas theft from local networks,
as well as protecting the gas monopoly’s shipments to Georgia, Armenia
and Azerbaijan. Gazprom says 1 billion cubic meters of gas per year
are siphoned off in Chechnya.

“This business would not bring us any revenues, but we would sharply
cut losses,” Gazprom’s deputy board chairman Alexander Ryazanov said
following a lightning visit to Grozny by top government officials
on Saturday.

Chechengazprom, which operates about 100 kilometers of main pipelines
in partnership with the Chechen administration, is currently under
full control of the Industry and Energy Ministry.

Ryazanov said that Gazprom might buy the enterprise or simply take
over a long-term management contract.

“We think it is time to take [Chechengazprom] back into the
unified system. [Chechen authorities] have no funds to manage these
pipelines,” Ryazanov was quoted by Interfax as saying. He said the
government also wants to lower the gas price for Chechen households
to 320 rubles ($11) per 1,000 cubic meters, compared to the 610 rubles
charged in the same pricing zone.

“Nobody pays for gas there, so the government is asking to lower the
price,” he said.

Ryazanov said that Chechnya owes Gazprom 5.5 billion rubles ($190
million) for gas consumed in recent years. The fate of this debt
is unclear.

Ryazanov suggested that it could either be restructured or paid for
by raising prices in other regions.

Leo Hamalian Tribute Program of Music and Speakers Thursday May 20 N

PRESS RELEASE

AGBU ARARAT LITERARY QUARTERLY PRESS RELEASE
55 E. 59th Street
New York, New York
CONTACT: [email protected]
May 18, 2004

LEO HAMALIAN MEMORIAL EVENING MAY 20 NYC

The Editorial Board of ARARAT invites the public to be present at
a special evening of appreciation and remembrance of Leo Hamalian,
its editor for over three decades. The gathering will take place on
Thursday, May 20, in the Ceremonial Hall of the New York Society for
Ethical Culture (Two West 64th Street, NYC), and will feature prominent
friends and colleagues of Leo Hamalian. Led by masters of ceremony
Peter Sourian and Nishan Parlakian, respectively a noted writer and
a dramatist, the evening’s program will include Armenian-American
writers Peter Balakian, Lynne Kassabian, and Harry Keyishian, as
well as City College professors emeriti Valerie Krishna and James
Hatch. Pianist and composer Sahan Arzruni will perform. There will
be a reception following the short program.

Leo Hamalian was a distinguished and prolific writer, educator, and
editor. He had a great impact on Armenian-American literature not
only through his own work as an essayist, critic, and anthologist,
but also through his ability to recruit new writers and assist in
their literary development. For Armenians, the literary and cultural
quarterly ARARAT published by the AGBU was perhaps the most important
forum through which Leo Hamalian worked his magic. Hamalian also
helped recognize and promote new Armenian-American writers through his
fourteen-year chairmanship of the Anahid Literary Award Committee of
the Armenian Center at Columbia University. Leo Hamalian served on the
boards of a number of other important journals, including The Literary
Review, Columbia, and Humerus, and as the editor of the American Book
Review. He worked at Harper’s Magazine (1958-64), and was coeditor of
Artists and Influence, the bi-annual publication of the Hatch-Billops
Archive for African-American Art. Dr. Hamalian published a number
of studies and edited numerous volumes and textbooks in many other
fields, ranging from existentialist literature to feminism and even
science fiction. He was a beloved professor of literature who taught
at universities as far away as Damascus and Tehran, but made his home
for many years at the City College in New York.

AGBU and the ARARAT Board are working to honor his memory in a
number of long-term ways. The AGBU-ARARAT Leo Hamalian Memorial
Fund has been established to support the literary work of ARARAT,
to which he was so dedicated, and donations to this fund are still
being accepted. Articles and other submissions are being accepted
until mid-July for a special ARARAT issue dedicated to Leo.

Meanwhile, please join us on May 20 at 7:30 p.m. Though the event
is without charge, reservations are required. To make reservations,
or for further information, contact Hripsime Arissian at the AGBU at
<[email protected]> or (212) 319-6383 ext. 131.

BAKU: Azeri media official displeased with BBC programmes

Azeri media official displeased with BBC programmes

Sarq, Baku
15 May 04

Text of Lala report by Azerbaijani newspaper Sarq on 15 May headlined
“The BBC’s activities in Azerbaijan are not satisfactory’ and subheaded
“The National TV and Radio Council voices its protest”

The National TV and Radio Council has joined the protests that have
lately been aired against the anti-Azerbaijani reports constantly
disseminated by the BBC Central Asia and the Caucasus Service in
its Russian language programmes and the radio station’s pro-Armenian
position on the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict.

The ruling New Azerbaijan Party has already voiced its protests
against anti-Azerbaijani propaganda by the Russian service of the radio
station. In the opinion of the National TV and Radio Council chairman,
Nusiravan Maharramli, in its activities in the Caucasus, BBC radio
should take into account the region’s subtle points. “Particularly,
it should take an impartial stance on the issue of Azerbaijan and
Armenia. We think that in this regard, the activities of BBC radio
are not satisfactory,” he said.

He went on to say that the National TV and Radio Council does not
have the power to deal with the problem. “The BBC is carrying
out its activities in Azerbaijan on the basis of international
agreements. For this reason, the Council has no right to intervene in
its activities. An opinion about the activities of this radio should
be voiced at the state level because the agreements were signed at
the state level,” Maharramli said.

The Council has started monitoring radio programmes. “We cannot
intervene in their creative process. But we should learn whether
these steps are being taken constantly or not. If the monitoring
shows that anti-Azerbaijani activities are under way, we will have to
ask the president to voice his attitude. If the radio is constantly
carrying out these activities in Azerbaijan, why should we not ban
their activities here?”

Leadership Changes in AGBU Toronto and Armen-Ontario of AGBU

AGBU PRESS OFFICE
55 East 59th Street, New York, NY 10022-1112
Phone (212) 319-6383
Fax (212) 319-6507
Email [email protected]
Webpage

Thursday, May 13, 2004

LEADERSHIP CHANGES IN AGBU TORONTO AND ARMEN-ONTARIO OF AGBU

Toronto, Canada – The Central Board of the Armenian General Benevolent
Union (AGBU) is pleased to announce that Ms. Knar Basmadjian will be
serving as Chairperson of the AGBU Toronto Chapter. Ms. Basmadjian
will be succeeding Mr. Hagop Altounian, effective June 1, 2004.

AGBU extends its sincere appreciation to Mr. Altounian for his
leadership and valued service for the past two years in establishing
new initiatives and promoting AGBU’s activities in the ever-growing
Canadian Armenian community of Toronto. Mr. Altounian has been an
active member of AGBU over many years, an organization which he has
served with full devotion, commitment and care.

On this occasion, Mr. Setrakian, President of AGBU, expressed the
organization’s deepest gratitude for Mr. Altounian’s lifelong service
and dedication to the Union. Mr. Setrakian further stated that he
welcomes Knar Basmadjian, in her new role as chairperson. We are
confident that Ms. Basmadjian will provide her committee with the
dynamism and vision to meet the new challenges lying ahead. We consider
Toronto a pivotal and important community of the Diaspora that could
assume an important leadership role in these fast-changing times,
Mr. Setrakian added.

Ms. Basmadjian, a professional engineer who holds an MBA, is
currently an Investment Advisor and Associate Portfolio Manager at
CIBC Wood Bundy, one of Canada’s largest investment dealers. She is
past-president of the Canadian Armenian Business Council of Ontario and
has been a board member since 1993. She is also an advisory committee
member of the Canada Armenian Parliamentary Friendship Group and a
trustee member of the Endowment Fund for the Holy Trinity Armenian
Church of Toronto. She will bring her extensive and successful
business experience in the financial services industry to her new
role as Chairman. We look forward to her leadership.

AGBU Armen-Ontario Corporation

The Central Board is also pleased to announce that Barry Berge
Papazian and Eugene Karadjian will be serving as President and
Treasurer/Secretary respectively of the Armen-Ontario Corporation.

Mr. Papazian will be succeeding Hrant Bardakjian as President of the
Corporation. Mr. Setrakian thanked Bardakjian for his leadership and
noted that he has been serving AGBU faithfully for many decades with
dedication and commitment. Mr. Bardakjian will continue as a member
of the Corporation and will serve as Chair of the AGBU Central Games
Committee.

Mr. Papazian is currently a managing partner at Papazian, Heisey &
Myers Law firm. Has bas been a barrister and solicitor since 1971. He
has been appointed to Queen’s Counsel (QC) in 1984 and is certified
by law society of Upper Canada (Ontario) as a specialist in civil
litigation since 1990. Mr. Papazian is the Director and Secretary of
Burger King Restaurants of Canada since 1982 and has served on the
Board of the University of Toronto from 1954-1985. He is the recipient
of the 2001 Man of the Year award at Holy Trinity Armenian Church and
has been the Secretary/Treasurer of Armen Ontario since December, 2003.

Mr. Karadjian has been a life-long member and has served AGBU well in
various capacities including his membership on the executive committee
of AGBU Toronto from 1986 to 1993.

Given this remarkable new leadership, the Central Board of AGBU is
confident that the AGBU Toronto Chapter and Armen-Ontario will ensure
the continued growth and success of AGBU in the greater Toronto area.

www.agbu.org

Leading European Electoral Candidates Meet With Armenian Community

EUROPEAN ARMENIAN FEDERATION
for Justice and Democracy
Avenue de la Renaissance 10
B – 1000 BRUXELLES
Tel./Fax : +32 (0) 2 732 70 27
E-mail : [email protected]
Web :

PRESS RELEASE
For Immediate Release
May 14th, 2004
Contact: Talline Tachdjian
Tel.: +32 (0)2 732 70 27

LEADING EUROPEAN ELECTORAL CANDIDATES MEET WITH ARMENIAN COMMUNITY

Lyon, France – On May 9th, the leading candidates for the European
Parliament elections from the southeast region of France addressed
the topic of Turkey’s accession to the European Union during a Europe
Day event organized by the Armenian National Committee of France and
the Armenian Revolutionary Federation.

Speaking at the event held at the Bourse du Travail in Lyon were
Thierry Cornillet (Union of French Democrats), Gérard Benhamias
(Greens), and Patrick Louis (Union for France). The debate was
moderated by France Inter Radio journalist Frederic Bourgade, with
participation of Franck Bianchieri from Think Tank Europe 2002 and
Hilda Tchoboian from the European Armenian Federation. Absent due
to the launching of their parties’ electoral campaigns, Françoise
Grossetête (Union for the Presidential Majority) and Michel Rocard
(Socialist Party) issued filmed statements.

Franck Bianchieri commented on the growing concern and opposition to
Turkey’ s accession that he noticed during the debates he moderated
in 100 European cities. Before an attentive audience of more than
a thousand attendees, Thierry Cornillet and Patrick Louis declared
their official opposition to Turkey’s accession for geographical,
cultural and demographic reasons, promising to uphold this position
when they are elected to the European Parliament. Likewise, Françoise
Grossetête, whose party recently made a dramatic shift in position on
the issue, favored a privileged partnership status for Turkey. From
the left, Gérard Benhamias from the Greens party stated that in his
opinion we should quickly integrate Turkey and that we should trust
the Turkish democrats to improve the Human Rights situation as well
as recognize the Armenian Genocide, which should result from the
country’s democratisation.

Expressing his viewpoint, Michel Rocard discussed the strategic
importance of Turkish accession because of Turkey’s ethnic and
cultural links with Turkish-speaking countries of central Asia that
have oil reserves from which Europe could benefit; according to him,
the recognition of the Armenian Genocide would naturally come when
Turkey would feel “ridicule” for its denial.

Hilda Tchoboian recalled that it is since the European Parliament
began the examination of Turkey’s candidacy in 2000 that it started
to consider the genocide and blockade issues, at the urging of the
European Armenian Federation. Recalling the Morillon and Lamassoure
reports, she denounced the inconsistencies between the declaration of
parties opposed to Turkish accession and their refusal to speak firmly
and truthfully to Turkey in the European Parliament annual reports.

Regarding the positions of the Left, Tchoboian refuted the exemplary
nature of Turkey’s accession for the Muslim world, because of Turkey’s
poor relations with its Arab neighbours. She also denounced the
argument of secularism, which in Turkey is not based on plurality and
on the separation of religion and State, but on the Turkish State’s
protection of the Muslim religion, which became the majority religion
after the extermination of Turkey’s non-Muslim citizens.

“If Europe does not require Turkey to adhere to its values as a
pre-condition to its accession, Europe will be forced to integrate
Turkey’s denialist values, and to give free rein to the denial of
other genocides,” affirmed the Chairperson of the European Armenian
Federation.

She emphasized that beyond a formal recognition, Europe must bring
about Genocide reparations, requiring in particular that Turkey give to
Armenia and to Armenian people guarantees of security. “Turkey must
promise to abolish its aggressive policy towards Armenia; this policy
is not the act of a regime, but rather follows from a State doctrine
that has continued under military, civil and Islamist regimes,”
concluded Tchoboian.

Concluding the first portion of the event, Georges Kepenekian declared
that Armenians would remain watchful, and would not give parties carte
blanche regarding matters that remain at the centre of attention
for European citizens. The second portion of the event included a
concert by the band Bratsch.

#####

http://www.eafjd.org

Greek-Turkish relations mending for EU

The Daily Star, Lebanon
May 13 2004

Greek-Turkish relations mending for EU

Cyprus accession puts added strain on historical enemies

By Sarah Khoury
Special to The Daily Star

ATHENS: December 2004 will be known as a new stepping-stone in the
triangular Greek Turkish Cypriot relations. It is when the European
Union will accept or reject accession negotiations with Turkey. If
the green light is given for consultations between both parties,
Turkey will be on a concrete path toward becoming an EU member. But
will southern Cyprus, a new EU member, veto Ankara’s entrance? And
how is this going to affect Greek-Turkish ties?

To satisfy EU demands for its entrance into the union, drastic
changes have to be made based on the 2002 Copenhagen summit criteria
that stipulates Turkey must complete a series of economic political
and human right reforms before the December due date.

The EU council will judge notably progress on human rights issues and
democratization. If the feedbacks are positive, the commission will
recommend start of accession negotiations. Athens, an EU member since
1981 has taken the initiative to offer technical assistance to its
neighbor.

In an interview with The Daily Star, director of the Greek-Turkish
relations department at Greek Foreign Ministry Vassilis Pistinis said
that, in its support for Turkey’s orientation into the EU, Greece has
created a task force to help Ankara establish or re-model its
legislations and economic cooperation to fit

EU criteria’s.

During his historical trip to Greece last week Turkish Premier Recep
Tayyip Erdogan pledged to seek “new horizons” with Greece. Greek
Prime Minister Costas Karamanlis repeated his backing for Turkey’s
bid to join the EU.

Analysts have seen Turkey’s public debt as a burden to its entrance
to the EU. But in an interview with The Daily Star, Turkish
Ambassador to Greece Yigit Alpogan took the opportunity to compare
his nation to Greece.

“Greece is an EU member. It has a population of 10 million and a
public debt of $60 million. Turkey has a population of 70 million
with $120 billion public debts. This is not an issue.”

After Cyprus’s entrance into the EU on May 1, Nicosia is now one step
ahead of Ankara, as it can stall and veto Turkey’s path toward the
EU.

Consequences of UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan’s failed blue print
in a bid to end Cyprus’s 30-year separation have topped discussions
among concerned parties. Both Pistinis and Alpogan have reiterated
the failed referendum will not strain bilateral ties.

Pistinis reiterated Athens stance on the need to avoid negative
consequences to the failed referendum. But Greek media have predicted
Cyprus would be sidelined from the diplomatic spotlight, especially
after Annan warned his blue print would not get a second chance.

Alpogan hailed Annan’s plan as an optimum compromise and said “in
modern diplomacy there must be some compromise a party can not get
all its demands fulfilled.” He said if Annan’s plan had passed it
would have been a “win-win” situation for all parties involved but
stressed Turkish-Greek relations would remain intact despite the
referendum.

Pistinis, for his part, added the EU would economically assist the
needs of Turkish-Cypriots. According to a draft EU document the union
pledged nearly $305 million to boost the economy of northern Cyprus
after the referendum left it out of the EU’s enlargement. Among
Turkish Cypriots some 65 percent approved Annan’s plan, which called
for a reunification of the island that would have abolished sanctions
and embargos on the northern part of the Cyprus.

Turkey is the only country that recognizes Turkish enclave on the
island.

When asked how Turkey felt about Greek Cypriot’s acceptance into the
EU, Turkish Ambassador to Greece Alpogan stated their application was
illegal because it only represents a portion of Cypriots.

“This government only represents the Greek side, so from the legal
sense the government did not and still does not represent all of
Cyprus that will one day unilaterally apply for EU membership. This
should be a legal application,” he said.

Alpogan added that according to the 1960 Zurich and London agreement,
Cyprus can only become a member of an organization in which both
Greece and Turkey are in. “Turkey is not a member of the EU,
therefore in 1990 that was one of our basic points of our objection
that this could not happen.”

He accused the EU of not listening to Ankara’s objection.

Director of the Greek-Turkish relations department at Greek Foreign
Ministry Pistinis agreed that under the agreements Cyprus could only
enter an organization in which both Greece and Turkey are part of. He
stressed NATO was an example of such an organization, but that the EU
did not fall under that specific legal definition.

Cyprus is not the only disagreement issue linking the two historical
enemies, but in recent years efforts have been made from both sides
to mend ties. Alpogan highlighted the 1999 rapprochement policy
drafted by Athens and Ankara, which he hailed as the beginning of “a
new era” in Turkish-Greek ties.

On a closer to home level, Greek and Turkish stances on the Aegean
Sea issue have been an ongoing difference between both Mediterranean
countries. Turkey says some Greek islands are situated on its
geographical shell calling it a “political issue,” while Greece
disputes that according to the 1975 delimitation of the continental
shell such a problem should be solved by the International Court of
Justice.

Pistinis hailed exploratory talks that are being held between both
countries and stressed: “Their purpose was to find common agreements
to solve problems and the delimitation of the continental shell.”

Pistins and Alpogan declined to give information on the
“confidential” content of discussions but expressed improvement and
optimism.

Another topic weighing down Greek-Turkish relations is the status of
minorities in Turkey which includes not only Greek Orthodox, but also
Assyrian, Armenians and Kurds.

Greek official Pistinis emphasized the right of religious freedom
under the Copenhagen agreement. He stressed Greece was concerned for
all non-Muslim minorities and not just for Greek Orthodox.

Bush cheers “Millennium Challenge” recipients

Bush cheers “Millennium Challenge” recipients

News 14 Carolina, NC
May 10 2004

(WHITE HOUSE) — President Bush is cheering the 16 poor countries
who’ll be receiving a big new infusion of U.S. aid, saying their
commitment to reform makes them a “bright light” in the developing
world.

The 16 have been chosen to share in a billion dollars from Bush’s
Millennium Challenge program.

The initiative will boost development aid by 50 percent but only
for countries that show they can spend the cash wisely. That means
fighting corruption, observing the rule of law, promoting health and
education and encouraging free markets.

This year’s recipients include eight African nations, plus the former
Soviet republics of Georgia and Armenia, and Central American nations
Nicaragua and Honduras.

In an East Room ceremony, the president said aid to reforming countries
will be “repaid many times over.”