ANKARA: Regional Mediator Turns To Swiss For Mediation

REGIONAL MEDIATOR TURNS TO SWISS FOR MEDIATION

Hurriyet
Sept 8 2009
Turkey

Tuesday, September 8, 2009
FULYA OZERKAN
ANKARA – Hurriyet Daily News

Usually reluctant to accept any third-party involvement in its
conflicts, Turkey now resorts to Swiss mediation to improve its
troubled relationship with Armenia, despite souring ties with the
European country over the Swiss law penalizing the denial of the
alleged Armenian genocide. As Turkey and Armenia try to sway public
opinion about an eventual deal, Switzerland expresses commitment to
the process given its traditional role in conflicts worldwide

The mediator in major regional conflicts including Israel-Syria,
Iran’s disputed nuclear program and last summer’s Georgia-Russia war
in the Caucasus, Turkey is now resorting to Swiss mediation to mend
its own fences with neighboring Armenia.

Ankara’s enthusiasm about playing the role of "facilitator" or
"mediator" in its neighborhood has increased under the ruling Justice
and Development Party, or AKP, government, and its foreign-policy
architect, Ahmet Davutoglu, a move that goes hand in hand with efforts
to revive Ottoman power in the Islamic world.

But when it comes to its own conflicts, Turkish foreign policymakers
have not expressed much willingness to accept any third parties’
involvement.

This is not the case with Armenia. A Turkish-Armenian joint road map
announced in April on the eve of the U.S. presidential proclamation on
the 1915 killings of Armenians, followed by last week’s joint protocol,
both referred to Switzerland as a mediator.

"We have not gone to Switzerland and asked them to mediate; the
request came from them," said a Turkish diplomat who wished to remain
anonymous.

While Turkey and Armenia attempt to sway public opinion in their
respective countries in favor of an eventual deal to better their
troubled relations, Switzerland expresses its commitment to the
process given its traditional role in conflicts worldwide.

"This is a confident position. The Swiss foreign policy, on very many
occasions, has answered favorably to requests of assistance by other
countries, if you take a look at the history of the 1950s and 1960s,"
said another diplomatic source, explaining the Swiss role.

Discreet talks

In order to ensure the continuity of the process, Swiss diplomats
remain very discreet about their support and what they could do. "We
are committed to helping both parties move ahead," the source said. "In
that sense, we are not very transparent about our assistance. We
are available and, of course, we congratulate both parties for the
advance."

Switzerland was the venue for secret talks between Turkish and Armenian
diplomats beginning in 2007, before they were made public and raised
to the foreign-ministerial level early this year.

"We have been asked by both sides. It is a traditional Swiss attitude
to be available," the source said. "The main purpose is to solve the
situation that needs a solution and we will be ready to help as long
as the parties need us."

Questions over Swiss availability

Turkey’s ties with Switzerland, however, soured when the Swiss
parliament passed a 2003 resolution recognizing the alleged Armenian
genocide and adopted a law penalizing its denial.

Swiss officials say the law is about neither Turkey nor Armenia,
saying the government, which has no control over judicial cases,
believes the 1915 events should be dealt with by historians.

"It is a specific article in the Swiss penal code that was designed
to prevent and punish the negation of genocide. Prosecutors receive
complaints, but without any advice or intervention from the Swiss
federal executive," said the source, who added that the Swiss
government has repeatedly said the 1915 killings should not be
discussed by non-historians.

"That is the position of the Swiss executive, so there is no point
in trying to imagine that there is a relationship between specific
penal cases in Switzerland and the quality of Swiss availability to
help Armenia and Turkey," the same source said.

Worldwide role

The Swiss role of mediation is not restricted to aiding
Turkish-Armenian relations. The latest initiative involves regional
rivals Georgia and Russia, which went to war last year.

"We accepted to represent the Russian interests in Georgia and the
Georgian interests in Russia. Though we do not appear as a facilitator,
we have a plain mandate according to international law, operating
since March of this year, to represent consular affairs," said the
diplomatic source.

Russia and Georgia rushed to get Swiss help to take over their
interests in each other’s capitals after the two countries broke off
diplomatic relations. "That means we are there not in a political role,
but to ensure that the consular-affairs section continue operating
under the Swiss," the source added. "It is another expression of the
capacity we want to have in order to be impartial and help countries."

Football diplomacy: Turkish-Armenian relations

The Economist
Sept 5 2009
U.S. Edition

Football diplomacy: Turkish-Armenian relations

It may take a long time to restore relations between two old enemies

AFTER decades of fierce animosity, are Turkey and Armenia getting
closer to peace? This week the two countries announced plans for six
weeks of "internal political consultations" before establishing
diplomatic ties and reopening their border. Coming after several
months of Swiss mediation and arm-twisting by America, the declaration
makes reconciliation between Turkey and Armenia a real prospect’but
not a foregone conclusion.

Hopes of a new friendship blossomed in September 2008 when Turkey’s
president, Abdullah Gul, became the first modern Turkish leader to
visit Armenia, for a football World Cup qualifier (which Armenia
lost). A full deal seemed imminent in April when the two countries
initialled a preliminary agreement, including a plan to reopen the
border. This was sealed by the Turks in 1993 in solidarity with their
Azeri cousins during Azerbaijan’s short, sharp war with Armenia over
Nagorno-Karabakh, a mainly Armenian enclave of Azerbaijan (which
Armenia won).

Turkey had earlier insisted that it would not reopen the border until
Armenia and Azerbaijan had made peace. But in April it seemed to
change tack. The main reason was to stop America’s Congress adopting a
resolution to label the mass slaughter of the Ottoman Armenians in
1915 as genocide. It worked: Barack Obama did not use the term in his
annual April 24th statement on the anniversary of the killings.

Yet days later the Turkish prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan,
reverted to previous policy by insisting that peace with Armenia would
come only if the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict was solved. The switch back
reflected nationalist reaction at home as well as Azerbaijan’s threat
to turn towards Russia. Armenia’s president, Serzh Sargsyan,
retaliated by saying he would not attend a return football match in
Turkey on October 14th unless the border was on the verge of being
reopened.

This week’s announcement is calculated to ensure that Mr Sargsyan
comes to the match, maintaining the façade of reconciliation. By
careful coincidence the time for internal political consultations ends
just before the match. Links of various sorts between the two
countries are growing fast and Armenian tourists have been flocking to
the Turkish coast. Yet hostility to a deal from opposition parties in
both countries is strong.

Armenia’s hardline nationalists are furious that the government has
agreed both to the present border and to a joint historical commission
that might yet call the genocide into doubt. They also accuse Mr
Sargsyan of selling out Karabakh. Even if the April 22nd deal is
accepted, another hurdle has been raised: both countries’ parliaments
must agree. To stifle domestic anger (and perhaps embarrass the Turks)
Armenia also chose to publish the full text of the agreements in
April. They do not mention Nagorno-Karabakh.

Turkey’s response has been contradictory. Its foreign minister, Ahmet
Davutoglu, insists that he hopes that the border will be reopened by
the end of the year. But he also says that peace with Armenia is
sustainable only if it makes peace with Azerbaijan. Long-running talks
between Armenia and Azerbaijan seem to be going nowhere. Mr
Davutoglu’s most accurate assertion may be that Turkey and Armenia are
at the start of a "long process." How long is anybody’s guess.

Nalbandyan-Vashadze Meeting

NALBANDYAN-VASHADZE MEETING

11:51:39 – 05/09/2009
olitics&pid=15088

On September 4, the meeting of the Armenian foreign minister Edward
Nalbandyan and his Georgian counterpart Grigol Vashadze who is in
Yerevan on a working visit took place.

The Armenian and Georgian foreign ministers discussed thoroughly a
wide range of issues relating to the bilateral relations. In this
context, they dwelt on the construction of the
Gyurmi-Akhltskha-Bavra-Batum highway.

On the initiative of the Armenian side, the collocutors also dwelt on
the question of the Armenians in living in Georgia.

The meeting was followed by signing a memorandum of exchanging area
for the diplomatic departments. The Armenian foreign ministry informs.

http://www.lragir.am/src/index.php?id=p

Armbusinessbank opens new `Ani’ subsidiary

Armbusinessbank opens new `Ani’ subsidiary
05.09.2009 11:46 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ On September 3, Armbusinessbank opened a new `Ani’
subsidiary in Gyumri, RA Shirak region, Armbusinessbank press service
reported.

Armbusinessbank was established by the decision of the general meeting
of bank founders in accordance with the constitutive agreement of 14
December 1994. According the agreement the bank is the legal successor
of the shareholding Arminvestbank established in September 1991.

License N40 of the Central Bank of the Republic of Armenia issued on
10 December 1991.

In April 2006 Ukrainian Ukrprombank purchased 35% shares of the
Arminvestbank. In mid-April the Christies Management Company,
registered on the British Virginia Islands, bought the 30% share of
the bank and. In June 2006 Ukrainian Alfa-Garant Insurance Company
purchased the remaining 35% shares of the Arminvestbank.

The decision on renaming the bank to Armbusinessbank was unanimously
accepted at the special meeting of the shareholders of the
Arminvestbank on August 10.

Bank is a member of SWIFT, Western Union, Anelik, Contact as well as
ArCa, MasterCard and Visa International.

21 Armbusinessbank subsidiaries are currently operating in Armenia.

NKR: Expanding Economic Cooperation

Expanding Economic Cooperation

NKR Government Information and
Public Relations Department

September 04, 2009

On September 3, the NKR President Bako Sahakyan held a tet-a-tet
meeting with RA President Serzh Sargsyan, who arrived in Artsakh to
partake in the festive events dedicated to the 18th anniversary of
proclamation of Nagorno Karabakh Republic.
Later on, the meeting took place at an enlarged format with the
participation of NKR Prime Minister and Finance Ministers of the two
Armenian states.
Issues related to the social and economic development of the NKR
and cooperation in financial and economic fields were discussed at the
meeting.
The necessity of continuous expansion of cooperation was mutually
underlined.
On the same day the Presidents of the two Armenian states held
another meeting and discussed issues ongoing in regions and the
settlement of the Azerbaijani-Karabakh conflict.
Speaker of the NKR National Assembly Ashot Ghoulyan, Prime Minister
Ara Haroutyunyan, head of the Office of the NKR President, secretary of
the Security Council Marat Mousayelyan, Defense Mminister Movses
Hakobyan and Foreign Minister Georgy Petrosyan partook at the meeting,-
Central Information Department of the NKR President’s Staff informs.

Reports Of Armenian Troop Deployment In Russia Denied

REPORTS OF ARMENIAN TROOP DEPLOYMENT IN RUSSIA DENIED

Asbarez Staff
-armenian-troop-deployment-in-russia-denied/
Sep 3rd, 2009

YEREVAN (RFE/RL)-Armenia will not have a permanent military presence
in Russia as part of its involvement in a Russian-led rapid reaction
force comprising troops from five former Soviet republics, a top
official in Moscow said on Thursday.

An agreement on the formation of the force, officially called the
Collective Operational Reaction Forces (CORF), was formalized in June
during a summit of the Collective Security Treaty Organization, a
Russian-led military alliance. Two of the CSTO’s seven member states,
Belarus and Uzbekistan, refused to sign the agreement because of
major disagreements with Moscow.

Citing an unnamed official at the CSTO headquarters in Moscow, the
Russian Regnum news agency reported last month that under the terms
of the deal, Armenia will be able to open two military bases in the
Russian North Caucasus. The official was quoted as saying that the
"limited contingent" would be stationed in the Krasnodar region and
the restive Muslim republic of Dagestan to primarily ensure "the
security of the transport infrastructure" in the area.

The Armenian government has not explicitly denied the information
so far. But Nikolay Bordyuzha, the CSTO secretary general, insisted
on Thursday that Moscow and Yerevan have not even negotiated on the
possibility of Armenian troop deployment in the mentioned area.

"Armenia is a party to the agreement on the Collective Operational
Reaction Forces and has set aside army units and special forces from
national security and internal affairs bodies for that purpose,"
Bordyuzha told Armenian journalists in a video conference from Moscow.

Bordyuzha said those forces would be normally based in Armenia. The
CORF would use them only "in cases where there is a need for their
involvement in carrying out a concrete military task," he added.

The Russian military is expected to contribute by far the largest
contingent of the CORF. Official Yerevan has yet to specify the number
of Armenian soldiers and other security personnel that it will commit
to the NATO-style force.

http://www.asbarez.com/2009/09/03/reports-of

Turkey Hopes For Breakthrough In Karabakh Settlement

TURKEY HOPES FOR BREAKTHROUGH IN KARABAKH SETTLEMENT

RIA Novosti
14:1201/09/2009

ANKARA, September 1 (RIA Novosti) – Turkey expects a breakthrough to
be reached soon in negotiations to end the long-running territorial
conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia, the country’s foreign minister
said on Tuesday.

Nagorny Karabakh, a mountainous region in Azerbaijan with a largely
Armenian population, has been a source of conflict between the
former Soviet republics since the late 1980s. The province has its
own government and is de facto independent.

"We want the conflict to be settled as soon as possible, and believe
that its settlement can be ensured if all the parties involved in
the Karabakh settlement show goodwill," Ahmet Davutoglu told NTV,
commenting on Monday’s agreement between Turkey and Armenia to start
"internal political consultations" on re-establishing diplomatic
relations and opening their borders.

Turkey closed its border with Armenia in 1993 in a show of support
for Muslim ally Azerbaijan following a war over Nagorny Karabakh
between Azerbaijan and Armenia.

Ankara has also demanded that Armenia drop its campaign to have the
mass killings of Armenians by Ottoman Turks in 1915 internationally
recognized as genocide.

In its turn, Yerevan has signaled its readiness to establish diplomatic
ties with Turkey without preconditions.

The Turkish minister said the current status quo in the Caucasus does
not serve the interests of Turkey, Azerbaijan or Armenia.

"Turkey has done all it can [to settle the Karabakh problem]. Now it’s
time the other parties accomplished their mission," Davutoglu said.

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan is expected to visit Turkey on
October 14, where he will attend a World Cup football qualifier
between the two countries.

Turkish President Abdullah Gul watched the first leg of the match in
Yerevan last year. Sarksyan said earlier he would go if the border
has reopened or Turkey has lifted its economic blockade of landlocked
Armenia.

Sargsyan Will Support

SARGSYAN WILL SUPPORT

ou
07:28 pm | September 01, 2009

Official

On August 31 Serzh Sargsyan received famous promoter Gary Shou
who is also promoter for world champion in the super-light boxing
category Vick Darchinyan. Participating in the meeting was also Vick
Darchinyan and NA Deputy, president of the National Olympic Committee
Gagik Tsarukyan.

Gary Shou informed the President that he plans to organize one of
Vick Darchinyan’s duels in Armenia next spring and mentioned that
there have yet to be professional boxing matches in Armenia.

Welcoming the idea, President Sargsyan expressed willingness to support
the implementation of that program. He also expresed confidence that
it will greatly please many boxing fans and allow Armenia to show
itself to the world.

http://a1plus.am/en/official/2009/09/1/sh

Anahita – Lady Of Persia

ANAHITA – LADY OF PERSIA
By Payam Nabarz

Iranian.com
de/79101
Sept 2 2009

The following is based on the Anahita chapter from ‘The Mysteries of
Mithras: The Pagan Belief That Shaped the Christian World’. By Payam
Nabarz, Inner Traditions, 2005.

Mighty Anahita with splendor will shine, Incarnated as a youthful
divine.Full of charm her beauty she will display,Her hip with charming
belt she will array.Straight-figured, she is as noble bride,Freeborn,
herself in puckered dress will hide.Her cloak is all decorated with
gold,With precious dress Anahita we shall behold.-Original poem based
on Kashani’s Persian folk songs, from an Avestan invocation to Anahita.

Dusk of Shabe Yalda (Yule) 777 B.C. somewhere on a beach by the
Caspian sea. A young Magi (who later was to be known as the prophet
Zoroaster) has been keeping a night vigil. His solitary fire is the
only light for miles around and his recitation of Aban Yasht the hymn
to angel-goddess Anahita the only sound to be heard apart from the
waves gently crashing onto the beach.

"Angel-Goddess of all the waters upon the earth and the source of the
cosmic ocean; she who drives a chariot pulled by four horses: wind,
rain, cloud, and sleet; your symbol is the eight-rayed star. You
are the source of life, purifying the seed of all males and the
wombs of all females, also cleansing the milk in the breasts of
all mothers. Your connection with life, means warriors in battle
prayed to you for survival and victory.A maid, fair of body, most
strong, tall-formed, high-girded, pure, . . . wearing a mantle fully
embroidered with gold; ever holding the baresma [sacred plant]
in your hand, . . . you wear square golden earrings on your ears
. . . a golden necklace around your beautiful neck, . . . Upon your
head . . . a golden crown, with a hundred stars, with eight rays
. . . with fillets streaming down." 1

The Magi’s prayer is answered by the sea in the form of a vision;
as midnight approaches and time slows, the sea parts. A large silver
throne appears; on either side of it sits a lion with eyes of blue
flame. On the throne sits a Lady in silver and gold garments, proud
and tall, an awe-inspiring warrior-woman, as terrifying as she is
beautiful. Tall and statuesque, she sits, her noble origins evident
in her appearance, her haughty authority made clear and commanding
through a pair of flashing eyes. A dove flies above her and a peacock
walks before her. A crown of shining gold rings her royal temples;
bejeweled with eight sunrays and one hundred stars, it holds her
lustrous hair back from her beautiful face. Her marble like white arms
reflect moonlight, and glisten with moisture. She is clothed with a
garment made of thirty beavers, and it shines with the full sheen of
silver and gold. The planet Venus shines brightly in the sky. 2

Time passes…..history takes place….

Circa 400B.C. Achaemenian king Artaxerxes II Mnemon (404â~@~Q359
B.C.) inscribes in Ecbatana in his palace:

"Artaxerxes, the great king, the king of kings, the king of all
nations, the king of this world, the son of king Darius [II Nothus],
Darius the son of king Artaxerxes [I Makrocheir], Artaxerxes the
son of king Xerxes, Xerxes the son of king Darius, Darius the son of
Hystaspes, the Achaemenid, says: this hall [apadana] I built, by the
grace of Ahuramazda, Anahita, and Mithra. May Ahuramazda, Anahita,
and Mithra protect me against evil, and may they never destroy nor
damage what I have built".3 Artaxerxes II like other Achaemenian
kings was initiated by priests at a sanctuary of Anahita in Pasargadai
during his coronation. Artaxerxes II built the temple of Anahita at
Kangavar near Kermanshah as well as many others. The Kangavar was
a magnificent huge temple a four-fifths of a mile in circumference,
built using cedar or cypress trees. All columns were covered by gold
or silver, even the floor tiles and bricks had a covering of gold or
silver. It was perhaps one of the most breathtaking buildings ever
made in the Middle East. Anahita’s role as the goddess for water, rain,
abundance, blessing, fertility, marriage, love, motherhood, birth, and
victory becomes well established. This goddess was the manifestation
of women’s perfection. Ancient kings were crowned by their queens in
Anahita’s temple in order to gain her protection and support. Anahita’s
blessing would bring fertility and abundance to the country. 4

Time passes…..history takes place…. the Achaemenian empires falls
to ‘Alexander the Accursed’…..

Circa 200 BC sees the dedication of a Seleucid temple in western Iran
to "Anahita, as the Immaculate Virgin Mother of the Lord Mithra".5
The blend of Greek and Persian cultures manifest themselves in the
Seleucid dynasty.

Time passes….. history takes place….

The Parthian Empire (circa 247BC-226AD) replaces the Seleucid, the
Parthians expand the Anahita temple at Kangavar.

Figure 1.2.: Bronze head of a goddess Anahita, Hellenistic Greek,
1st century BC found at the ancient city of Satala, modern Sadak,
north-eastern Turkey, now in The British Museum.

Time passes…. history takes place…

Mark Anthony marches in to Armenia (circa 37BC-34BC), and in one of
the latter campaigns reached Anahita temple at Erez. "The temple
of Erez was the wealthiest and the noblest in Armenia, according
to Plutarch. During the expedition of Mark Antony in Armenia, the
statue was broken to pieces by the Roman soldiers. Pliny the Elder
gives us the following story about it: The Emperor Augustus, being
invited to dinner by one of his generals, asked him if it were true
that the wreckers of Anahit’s statue had been punished by the wrathful
goddess. No! answered the general, on the contrary, I have toâ~@~Qday
the good fortune of treating you with one part of the hip of that gold
statue. The Armenians erected a new golden statue of Anahit in Erez,
which was worshiped before the time of St. Gregory Illuminator."6

Time passes…. history takes place…

The Sassanian Empire is formed. Circa 226 C.E. The Temple of Anahita in
Bishapur was built during the Sassanian era (241â~@~Q635 C.E.). The
temple is believed to have been built by some of the estimated
seventy thousand Roman soldiers and engineers who were captured by
the Persian King Shapur (241â~@~Q272 C.E.), who also captured three
Roman emperors: Gordian III, Phillip, and Valerian. The design of the
temple is very interesting: water from the river Shapur is channeled
into an underground canal to the temple and actually goes under and
all around the temple, giving the impression of an island. The fire
altar would have been in the middle of the temple, with the water
going underground all around it. One might interpret this as a union
of water–Anahita–with fire–Mithra.7

Time passes….history takes place…

The Sassanian Empires fades and Islam arrives in Iran.

900 C.E. Moslem pilgrims make their way to the 1100-year-old shrine
of Bibi Shahr Banoo, the Islamic female saint, near the old town of
Rey (South of Tehran). Town of Rey is thought to be 5000 years old,
the site of this shrine with its waterfall is believed by some to
have been an Anahita shrine at one time. It is also close to the
Cheshmeh Ali Hill (the spring of Ali Hill), which is dated to 5000
years ago. Perhaps this is an echo of Mithra-Anahita shrines being
close to each other and then becoming linked to later Islamic saints,
a process seen frequently in Christianized Europe too; for example,
sites sacred to the Celtic goddess Brigit became sites dedicated to
Saint Brigit.

Furthermore, according to Susan Gaviri in Anahita in Iranian Mythology
(1993): ". . . it must not be forgotten that many of the famous fire
temples in Iran were, in the beginning, Anahita temples. Examples
of these fire temples are seen in some parts of Iran, especially
in Yazad, where we find that after the Muslim victory these were
converted to Mosques."8

Time passes…. history takes place….

Pilgrims continue to visit the Pre-Islamic Zoroastrian shrine of
Pir e Sabz, or Chek Chek ("drip drip," the sound of water dripping),
in the mountains of Yazd. This is still a functional temple and the
holiest site for present-day Zoroastrians living in Iran, who take
their annual pilgrimage to Pir e Sabz Banu, "the old woman in the
mountain," also called Pir e Sabz, "the green saint," at the beginning
of summer. Pir means "elder," and it can also mean "fire." The title
of Pir also connotes a Sufi master. Sabz means green.9

Pilgrims also continue to visit Pir e Banoo Pars (Elder Lady of Persia)
and Pir e Naraki are located near Yazd. (The dates are unclear.) The
Pir Banoo temple is in an area that has a number of valleys; the name
of the place is Hapt Ador, which means Seven Fires.10

Time passes…. history takes place…

Figure 1.4.: Commemorative gold coin with image of Anahita, 1997.

The Central Bank of Armenia in 1997, issues a commemorative gold coin
with an image of Anahita on it. The bank states: "This commemorative
coin issued by the Central Bank of Armenia is devoted to Goddess
Anahit. Anahit has been considered the Mother Goddess of Armenians,
the sacred embodiment and patron for the crop, fruitfulness and
fertility. In 34 BC, the Romans have plundered the country town Yeriza
of the Yekeghiats Province in the Higher Hayk, where the huge golden
statue to Anahit was situated. They smashed the statue to pieces and
shared among the soldiers as pillage. On the turn of the 19th century,
the head part of bronze statue referred to Anahit was found in Satagh
(Yerznka region), which is presently kept in British Museum." 11

Time passes…. history takes place…

The higher social status of women in Iranian society compared to its
Arab neighbors has been suggested by some to be due its long respect
for Lady Anahita. Indeed, the first woman Muslim to win a Noble Peace
Prize (2003) was from Iran.

Time passes…. history take place….. yet she is still remembered….

"Tomorrow (21.8.03), I (Jalil Nozari) will take part in a ceremony
to commemorate a very poor, old woman, a relative of mine, who
died recently. Her name was Kaneez. The name in modern Farsi has
negative connotations, meaning a "female servant." But, in Pahlavi,
the language spoken in central Iran before the coming of Islam,
it meant "a maiden," a virgin, unmarried girl. Indeed, it has
both meanings of the English "maid." Anahita, too, means virgin,
literally not defiled. But this is not the end of story. When I was
a child, there was a place in Ramhormoz, my hometown, that now is
under a city road. In it, there was a small, single-room building
with a small drain pipe hanging from it. Women in their ninth month
and close to delivery time stood under this pipe and someone poured
water through it. There was the belief that getting wet under the
drain would assure a safe delivery of the baby. The building was
devoted to Khezer (the green one).* Yet, the cult is very old and
clearly one of Anahita’s. The role of water and safe child delivery
are both parts of the Anahita cult. My deceased aunt, our Kaneez,
was a servant of this building. The building was demolished years
ago to build a road, and Kaneez is no more. I wonder how will we
reconstruct those eras, so close to us in time yet so far from our
present conditions. It is also of interest that there exist remains
of a castle, or better to say a fort, in Ramhormoz, that is called
"Mother and Daughter." It belongs to the Sasanides era. "Daughter,"
signifying virginity, directs the mind toward Anahita. There are other
shrines named after sacred women, mostly located beside springs of
water. These all make the grounds for believing that Ramhormoz was
one of the oldest places for Anahita worshippers."12

(*There is a folk tradition about Saint Khezer or Khidar (the green
one): if one washes (pours water) on one’s front door at dawn for
forty days, he will appear. Khider is described as being a friend of
the Sufis, and is said to stand at the boundary of sea and land. He
is also said to have drunk from the fountain of immortality.)

Time passes…..

2004 C.E. Another seeker meditating by a sea makes an observation
on relationships Mehr and Aban (modern Persian names for Mithra
and Anahita.) The autumn equinox marks the beginning of the Persian
month of Mehr, and the start of the festival of Mehregan. The month
of the sun god Mithra is followed by the month of the sea goddess
Anahita (according to ancient sources both the partner and mother
of Mithra). The month of the sun thus leads into the month of the
sea. The sun sets into the ocean. The sunset over the ocean is one of
the most beautiful sights there is; as the sun unites with the ocean,
the light is reflected upon the water.

Mehr, coming together with Aban, gives rise to a third word: mehraban,
which translates as "kindness," or "one who is kind." Thus, this
metaphorical child of light that comes out of the marriage between
Sun and Sea is kindness. The child of light is the Inner Light, which
is in everyone. The Sun (light of God) and the Sea (divine ocean),
united within each person, creates perhaps the most important spiritual
quality–that of human kindness.

Time passes…

2777 C.E. Somewhere on a beach by the Caspian Sea. A young Magi has
been keeping a night vigil. His solitary fire is the only light for
miles around and his recitation of Aban Yasht the hymn to angel-goddess
Anahita the only sound to be heard apart from the waves gently crashing
onto the beach……she is remembered.

Further reading: ‘The Mysteries of Mithras: The Pagan Belief That
Shaped the Christian World’ By Payam Nabarz, (with a Foreword by
Caitlín Matthews), Inner Traditions, 2005.

References

1. From verses 126-128 of the Aban Yasht 5.

2. This description of Anahita is based on her description in Tony
Allan, Charles Phillips, and Michael Kerrigan, Myth and Mankind series:
Wise Lord of the Sky: Persian Myth (London: Time Life Books, 1999), 32.

3. See:

4. Official entry on Anahita by the Embassy of the Islamic
Republic of Iran in Ottawa, Canada on their Web site:
_And_Mythical_Deities.html

5. First Iranian Goddess of productivity and values
by Manouchehr Saadat Noury – Persian Journal, Jul 21,
2005. 78.shtml

6. A History of Armenia By Vahan M. Kurkjian,
Bakuran. IndoEuropeanPublishing.com, 2008.

7. For the Temple of Anahita at Bishapur, see
hapur/AnahitaBishapur00.htm

8. This book is in Persian–translation here by Nabarz.

9. For the temple at Pir-e-Sabz, see
r-e-Sabz-1.htm

10. For the temples of Pir e Banoo Pars and Pir e Naraki, see
roastrian.htm

11. _locale=en

12. Personal communication from Jalil Nozari , August 20, 2003.

Author Biography:

Payam Nabarz is author of ‘The Mysteries of Mithras: The Pagan
Belief That Shaped the Christian World’ (Inner Traditions, 2005),
‘The Persian Mar Nameh: The Zoroastrian Book of the Snake Omens
& Calendar’ (Twin Serpents, 2006), and Divine Comedy of Neophyte
Corax and Goddess Morrigan (Web of Wyrd, 2008). He is also editor of
Mithras Reader An academic and religious journal of Greek, Roman, and
Persian Studies. Volume 1(2006), Volume 2 (2008) and Stellar Magic: a
Practical Guide to Rites of the Moon, Planets, Stars and Constellations
(Avalonia, 2009) For further info visit:

Further reading: The Mysteries of Mithras: The Pagan Belief That
Shaped the Christian World, by Payam Nabarz. Inner Traditions, 2005.

Wise Lord of the Sky: Persian Myth, by Tony Allan, Charles Phillips,
and Michael Kerrigan. Myth and Mankind series. Time Life Books, 1999.

.Anahita in Iranian Mythology, (Anahita dar usturah ha-yi Irani),
by Susan Gaviri. Tehran, Intisharat-i Jamal al Haqq, (year 1372), 1993.

First Iranian Goddess of productivity and values, by Manouchehr Saadat
Noury in the Persian Journal, Iranian.ws, Jul 21, 2005.

The Avestan Hymn to Mithra trans. Ilya Gershevitch. Cambridge
University Press, 2008.The Heritage of Persia, by Richard
N. Frye. Mazda, 1993.Textual sources for the study of Zoroastrianism
by Mary Boyce. University of Chicago Press, 1990.

http://www.iranian.com/main/no
http://astore.amazon.co.uk/pan05-21
http://www.livius.org/aa-ac/achaemenians/A2Ha.html
http://www.salamiran.org/Women/General/Women
http://www.iranian.ws/iran_news/publish/printer_83
http://www.vohuman.org/SlideShow/Anahita%20Bis
http://www.vohuman.org/SlideShow/Pir-e-Sabz/Pi
http://www.sacredsites.com/middle_east/iran/zo
http://www.cba.am/CBA_SITE/currency/aanahit.html?_
www.stellarmagic.co.uk

Aghjayan: The Protocols: A Disaster For Armenian Foreign Policy

AGHJAYAN: THE PROTOCOLS: A DISASTER FOR ARMENIAN FOREIGN POLICY
By George Aghjayan

2/aghjayan-the-protocols-a-disaster-for-armenian-f oreign-policy/
September 2, 2009

The announcement of the establishment of diplomatic relations between
Turkey and Armenia this week has already received both positive and
negative critiques from various circles. Unfortunately, the initial
reaction has only touched on superficial aspects of the announcement.

Tuesday’s statement by the eastern U.S. and Canada district of the
Armenian Democratic Liberal (ADL) is particularly surprising. The ADL
seems satisfied that simply announcing diplomatic relations with the
promise to "formulate recommendations" for resolving as yet undefined
issues suffices for a "political victory for Armenia." Hallelujah,
we can now believe that "Turkey finally realizes that in a civilized
world good neighborly relations are beneficial to both countries." Such
assertions lead one to wonder if anyone from the ADL actually read
the documents.

A statement by the Bureau of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation
(ARF) was more cautious and critical of the protocols. The ARF claims
the protocols "question the veracity of the Armenian Genocide" and
that, while not included explicitly, Turkey continues to include the
return of Artsakh (Karabagh) to Azerbaijan as a pre-condition.

Presumably, during the months of negotiations over the language to
be contained in the protocols, there were requests by both Turkey and
Armenia to include or exclude certain language. So, when one analyzes
the final document, it can be viewed from the perspective of which
country asked for inclusion of each point and, thus, critique the
effectiveness of each country’s diplomacy.

When viewed in that light, the obvious question is what has each
country gained and, by correlation, given up. Some statements contained
in the protocols are of such a nature as to question why they were
included at all.

For instance, why is there a need to "condemn all forms of terrorism,
violence, and extremism"? Which country asked that this be included
and for what purpose? My suspicion is that this was included at the
request of Turkey and will be used as a weapon in the dispute over
Artsakh. Regardless of the realities, it is well documented that both
Turkey and Azerbaijan portray the self-defense of the Armenians in
Artsakh as terrorism. The other obvious objective is the security of
pipelines through the region.

Again, to analyze the protocols from an Armenian perspective, you
must break down each declaration with an eye towards how Turkey will
use it as a reason to leave its promises unfulfilled. What exactly
are those promises (i.e. what has Turkey given up)? A review of the
protocols indicates only one item that could even remotely be termed
an ask from Armenia, and that is the opening of the border with the
resulting commerce.

The issue is that the opening and closing of the border can be
done effortlessly and immediately, as required. Thus, any action
by Armenian that Turkey deems a breach in the protocols would lead
to an immediate closure of the border. From Turkey’s perspective,
all the better if Armenia becomes reliant on the cross-border commerce.

Unfortunately, what Armenia has given up cannot be retaken so
easily. For instance, Armenia continues to affirm the existing border
with Turkey and the formation of an historical commission.

The vague objectives of the commission hardly give one a warm
feeling-to "implement a dialogue with the aim to restore mutual
confidence" is not exactly aiming high. In addition, the promise of
"impartial scientific examination" cannot be guaranteed. The unstated
"existing problem" of course is the recognition of the Armenian
Genocide and, as many have already pointed out, that has already been
internationally accepted.

Finally, the inclusion of a "commitment to refrain from pursuing any
policy incompatible with the spirit of good neighborly relations" must
be questioned in light of affirmation of the Armenian Genocide. Either
Turkey will claim that efforts at international recognition of the
Armenian Genocide will constitute a policy that is counter to "good
neighborly relations" or, more appropriately, Armenia should demand
Turkey cease all efforts to deny the genocide as denial of a known
genocide is clearly meant to demean Armenians and threaten Armenia.

Contrary to the assertions of the ADL, the protocols are a disaster
for Armenian foreign policy.

http://www.hairenik.com/weekly/2009/09/0