South Ossetia one year on: Georgians wait in fear for Russians

South Ossetia one year on: Georgians wait in fear for Russians to
return
A year ago, the Kremlin shocked the world when it sent troops into
Georgia. Today, the war clouds over South Ossetia are gathering once
more.

By Adrian Blomfield in Gori

Daily Telegraph/uk
01 Aug 2009

Clambering up a steep hill outside the Georgian city of Gori, they fix
a borrowed pair of binoculars on the gutted cottages that, until a year
ago, they called home.

Russian shares rise as conflict is haltedCloser inspection is
impossible. Though Eredvi is just a few miles away, it lies in the
breakaway province of South Ossetia and their way is blocked by Russian
troops and the local militiamen who burned their village down.

Though his eyes are weak and his body wracked by illness, Tengiz
Razmadze occasionally makes the trip to the top of the hill, listening
as his younger son Zaza describes the ruins of the little house at the
end of the village.

Mr Razmadze has no need to see for himself. He lived through the
destruction of his home, refusing to leave even as the roar of Russian
bombers filled the skies during five days of war last August, killing
his neighbours and striking his house.

It was only as Ossetian militiamen, bent on revenge, embarked on
drunken looting sprees in Georgian villages like Eredvi that lay on
Ossetian soil, that he finally decided to flee.

He reached Gori, a supposedly safe sanctuary deep in undisputed
Georgian territory, only to find that his older son Zviadi had just
been buried, after being killed in a Russian air strike.

Zaza Razmadze saw the explosions that killed his brother. Running
through the choking dust and smoke that darkened the sky above Gori, he
stumbled on his body in the forecourt of the block of flats where Zvio,
as his family knew him, lived.

It was here that The Sunday Telegraph came across Zaza Razmadze,
cradling his brother’s head in his arms and imploring him to live as he
ripped off his own shirt to try to staunch his wounds.

Photographs of his grief were to become the defining images of the
short but brutish war Georgia and Russia fought a year ago, images so
compelling that the Kremlin sought to dismiss them as fabrication.

In the garage where the two men worked together, Zaza Razmadze has
built a shrine to the brother he loved, a small fountain above which he
has carved the word’s "Zvio’s Stream".

Jerkily he recalled that hot August day, explaining that ` unbeknown to
him ` as he tended Zvio’s body his brother’s wife, eight months
pregnant, was also dying in the flat above.

"They had left the previous day," he said with quiet but forceful
bitterness. "I still don’t know why they came back."

The only person who could answer that question is his nephew,
eight-year-old Dito. Wounded in the blast that killed his parents, Dito
is still to traumatised to speak of what happened.

Two months ago, Zaza Razmadze got married. But any happiness that
brought remains clouded by grief and anger, emotions that are caused to
burn more deeply by a conflict that was frozen but never resolved ` and
by talk of a new war.

"If war resumes, every citizen of Gori will fight," he said. "Even the
women will fight, even my new wife. We have nothing to lose."

In the 12 months since a war that stunned the world, Georgia has
slipped from its consciousness.

Yet tensions remain high. At least 28 Georgian policemen patrolling the
administrative boundary have been killed by sniper fire or remotely
detonated mines since the end of the war. At border crossings, now
sealed, Georgian and Russian guns remain trained on each other.

Less than 100 yards separate the Russian and Georgian flags that
flutter above identical dugouts, protected by sandbags and concrete
barriers at the crossing of Ergneti.

Capt Zura, the officer commanding the Georgian side of the line,
pointed out Russian sniper positions on the roof of an abandoned hotel.
"The Russians make a lot of trouble, especially at night when they are
drunk," he said.

Later that evening, Georgian officers at a nearby crossing said they
had come under fire, claiming that a rocket-propelled grenade had
exploded above their positions.

Such is the instability that the International Crisis Group, a leading
conflict prevention think tank, warned in June that "extensive fighting
could again erupt."

A European Union investigation is still trying to establish who was
responsible for last year’s war, which ended in a humiliating
battlefield rout for the Georgian army. But western diplomats in Tblisi
say it is fairly clear that Mikheil Saakashvili, Georgia’s pro-western
president, walked into a carefully laid Russian trap by launching a
massive assault against the Ossetian rebels, who had long enjoyed
Moscow’s support.

Some military analysts in Moscow say that Russia is now contemplating a
new war to oust Mr Saakashvili, whose determination to seek Nato
membership for Georgia has consistently infuriated the Kremlin.

Remarkably, the Georgian leader has defied widespread predictions that
failure in the war would cost him his job ` despite four months of
protests called by Georgia’s fragmented opposition.

But elsewhere, the omens do not look good. Since recognising the
independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, another Kremlin-backed
rebel enclave in Georgia, Russia has deployed thousands of troops in
both provinces and has begun building new military bases.

The Russian defence ministry angrily declined immediate comment on its
troop levels in the two provinces and accused The Sunday Telegraph of
failing to respect its dignity.

The Kremlin has also forced the withdrawal of two international
observer missions from the conflict zone and, in breach of its
ceasefire commitments, has prevented the third, the European Union
Monitoring Mission (EUMM), from operating in either South Ossetia or
Abkhazia.

Even more worryingly, the EUMM came under attack for the first time
when an ambulance driver was killed in an assault on a monitors’ convoy
near Abkhazia in June.

"It was a definite attack on the EUMM," said Steve Bird, a Foreign
Office official attached to the mission. "The mine used in the attack
was remotely detonated."

The EUMM says that Georgia has abided by the ceasefire agreements,
brokered by French President Nicolas Sarkozy, that ended last year’s
war, but the Russians have not.

In one of its most contentious moves, Russia used the days after the
ceasefire to seize control of Akhalgori, a largely Georgian district of
South Ossetia that had been under government control for over a decade.

Russia now allows buses to carry displaced Georgians to their homes in
Akhalgori, which ` unlike those elsewhere in Ossetia ` have largely
escaped the arsonists. But most are still too afraid to stay for long.

The Sunday Telegraph received a brusquer welcome at the Russian
checkpoint when it sought permission to take photographs of buses
crossing into Akhalgori. "Go and take your pictures in Georgia," the
Russian commanding officer said, before stalking off in a rage.

Observers suspect that Russia’s tactics are partly aimed at laying the
groundwork for a new war. A pretext could be created, they say, either
by engineering a cross-border incident that results in Russian
casualties ` or by accusing Georgia of helping anti-Kremlin rebels in
Russia’s nearby North Caucasus region.

In a potentially disturbing omen, Russia on Saturday threatened to "use
all available force and means" to defend its civilians after claiming
that Georgia had launched several attacks on the separatist capital
Tskhinvali in recent days. Georgia denied the allegations and the EUMM
said it had been unable to verify Russia’s claims.

Last week it also claimed that North Caucasus rebels were operating in
Georgia’s Pankisi Gorge.

"There is definitely a pattern to what the Kremlin is doing," said a
senior Western diplomat in Tbilisi. He said that Moscow wanted control
over Georgia, both to prevent the construction of a gas pipeline that
would reduce Europe’s energy dependence on Russia and to find an easier
way of supplying its own troops in Armenia.

But with Russia unlikely to find a pliant successor to Mr Saakashvili,
the diplomat said a major war was unlikely. Instead, he predicted that
Russia would make creeping advances deeper into Georgian territory or
launch occasional bombing raids, as part of a campaign to destabilise
its neighbour.

"Georgia would protest to the international community but without
guaranteed success," he said. "The law of the strongest will apply."

In the meantime, for tens of thousands of Georgians uprooted from their
homes or scarred from those few days of war, daily life grows ever more
desperate.

Over three days last week, The Sunday Telegraph revisited villages in
Georgia that bore the brunt of the Russian advance and the brutal
reprisals by the accompanying Ossetian militias.

The border village of Ergneti has been all but abandoned, save for the
occasional family that ekes out an existence in the charred ruins of
their homes.

Ivane Dvalishvili showed us the rusted remains of his grandson’s first
bicycle, almost all he had salvaged from the rubble. His 80-year-old
neighbour, Gaioz, had neatly swept his destroyed possessions into large
piles by the blackened walls of his house.

A year ago, during an intense Russian arterial assault, the Sunday
Telegraph took shelter with Makhvala Orshuashvili by the wall of her
garden in the village of Tkviavi, where she fed us peaches from her
orchard, shouting over the noise of the shells.

We found her where we left her, sitting on a bench outside the garden `
only this time she was wearing a black headscarf to denote mourning.

When the Ossetians came through, raping and pillaging, they came across
her husband returning home with bread. Telling him to run, they shot
him in the back and he died later of starvation after rejecting food.

Makhvala cowered in terror inside her house, listening as the drunken
soldiers played a stolen guitar on the street outside.

Back in Gori, stung by the financial crisis and the aftershocks of war,
Zaza Razmadze is lucky if he takes home more than £5 a day, half what
he earned before the conflict.

With that he must support the families of eight relatives who were also
forced out of Ossetia when the militias embarked on what the Council of
Europe has described as a campaign of ethnic cleansing against
Georgians.

The Georgians of South Ossetia, about 25,000, are now housed in
identikit camps that have mushroomed near the administrative boundary
with the rebellious province.

A small, whitewashed cottage in one of the camps now houses Zaza
Razmadze’s father, Tengiz. Blind in one eye, his eyesight failing in
the other, Mr Razmadze ekes out an existence in his half-painted rooms,
furnished with only a narrow bed, a flimsy table and a small
television, on the £17 a month provided by the state.

Like other Georgians in South Ossetia, he was never rich. But the
fecund soil allowed them to create fruit orchards and vegetable
gardens. In their new accommodation, Ossetia’s displaced can no longer
fend for themselves.

Tengiz Razmadze seems a broken man, much older than his 60 years. He is
trying to summon up the mental and physical strength to commemorate the
first anniversary of his son’s death on Aug 9. But it will be a
struggle. "I don’t know if I can survive the pain and sorrow again," he
said.

ANKARA: The Ugly Truth About The Kurdish Question — The Armenian Qu

THE UGLY TRUTH ABOUT THE KURDISH QUESTION — THE ARMENIAN QUESTION!?
By Orhan Kemal Cenga°Z

Today’s Zaman
2-109-the-ugly-truth-about-the-kurdish-question-th e-armenian-question-by-orhan-kemal-cengiz.html
Jul y 31 2009
Turkey

If we could discuss the Armenian question openly, if we could confront
the Armenian tragedy, there would not have been a Kurdish question.

We are far from understanding the Armenian question, yet can we be
close to solving the Kurdish question?

To answer this, we need to look at how the Kurdish question emerged
in the first place. The same state "problem solving" mentality was in
work for both the Armenian and Kurdish questions. Population exchanges,
forceful evacuations and atrocities directed at civilians. Nothing
has changed over all these years. The same "problem solving" mentality
created the very problem it was trying to solve. The Kurdish question
was very simple to solve in the beginning. There was a marginal armed
group (the PKK, or Kurdistan Workers’ Party) which used to carry out
sporadic attacks against security forces. Most Kurds did not like
them. But many Kurds also wanted to be recognized as Kurds; be able to
preserve and live their culture, speak their language and so on. At
that time, the Turkish official stance — dictated by the military,
basically — was very rigid on the Kurdish question. According to this
"understanding," there were no Kurds, there was no separate Kurdish
language. Kurds were "mountain Turks." They were called "Kurds"
because of the sound they make when they walk on snow: "Kart," or
"Kurt." For those of you who do not know the difference between Kurdish
and Turkish, they are about as similar as Chinese and English. So
basically, the official understanding of the Kurdish question was a
joke. If we did not know the sufferings of Kurds as a result of this
"unwise" approach, we could even say that the Turkish state has a
dry sense of humor because of the creation of this "mountain Turk"
concept. But it was not a joke, and this understanding of the question
caused a serious human tragedy in Anatolia once again.

The treatment of Kurdish prisoners in the Diyarbakır prison after the
1980 military coup was a turning point. The torture and ill treatment
of Kurdish inmates in this prison was beyond human imagination. The
Diyarbakır prison was like a Nazi concentration camp. The inmates
suffered so much that upon release almost all of them went to the
mountains to join the ranks of the PKK. People were imprisoned even for
just expressing peaceful ideas about the Kurdish problem. It would not
be an exaggeration to say that the phenomenon of the Diyarbakır prison
created the PKK we know today. With these "angry" militants in its
ranks, the PKK increased the number of its attacks dramatically. The
Turkish security apparatus started to seek new ways to handle this
"new phenomenon" and (not surprisingly, of course) came up with the
idea of using more violence. They created the concept of "fighting
terrorists with their own methods." Kurdish villages were set on fire;
3,000 villages were destroyed. The monster created by the Turkish
deep state, JÄ°TEM (an illegal gendarmerie unit), claimed more than
17,000 lives. People were abducted in broad daylight, and their dead
bodies later thrown onto streets, under bridges and into wells. No
person ever turned up alive after being taken by JITEM. The terror
they created, like the terror in the Diyarbakır prison, sent more
and more militants to the PKK.

Stuck between a rock and hard place

This is one side of the coin. On the other side, there is the PKK. It
was first established as a Marxist-Leninist organization and turned
into an extremely nationalist, violent structure. Many times, poor
Kurdish villagers were persecuted simultaneously by security forces
and the PKK, both of which accused villagers of aiding and abetting
"the other" one. The PKK killed many Kurds. The PKK tortured and
killed its own militants. The PKK used terrorist attacks, including
suicide bombings, exploding bombs in the most crowded streets, and so
on. The PKK was ruled by an iron fist. To be honest, for many years
I thought the worst thing that could ever happen to the Kurds would
be to live under the authority of the PKK, which has the potential
of becoming one of the worst dictatorships the world has ever seen.

Today we are at a point where Turkish state officers mention the
"Kurdish question" openly, and both the PKK and the Turkish state are
about to explain their "road maps" for a solution to the problem. In
the past, there were occasions when we all felt so close to the
solution. Each time, the "Turkish deep state" and the "deep PKK"
found a way to sabotage the whole process. Today, because of the
Ergenekon case, we are in a more advantageous situation. At least one
"party" has fewer options to sabotage the "process." But what is this
process? Does it include an open confrontation with our past? Does
it include both Turks and Kurds questioning taboos? Will it lead us
to confront older and deeper wounds in our past, like the Armenian
tragedy, which was created by Turks and Kurds together?

My observation is that no one in Turkey is ready for this kind of
confrontation. Instead, everyone waits for "the other" to accept their
responsibility without sacrificing anything. I strongly believe that
if we do not confront this ugly past, if we do not open our hearts
to the human suffering, no "solution" will be long lasting. If
Kurds do not open their hearts to PKK members who were tortured
and killed by the PKK or the Turkish victims of terror created by
this organization, likewise if Turks fail to understand the pain and
suffering of Kurdish villagers who were wrested from their very roots,
we cannot solve anything. This is the first level. At the second
level, we need a deeper understanding. Both Turks and Kurds need to
confront the Armenian tragedy, which they created together. If Kurds
start to understand this tragedy, they will get rid of the illusion
that they are the only people who ever suffered in Anatolia. If they
understand the Armenian tragedy, and how Kurds were used by the deep
state then, they would be much more humble, much less nationalist. We
need to question many things. Every answer will lead to other
questions. This is a process full of pain. Is anyone ready for that
much deep questioning? I don’t think so. Unless we engage this kind of
questioning, we will inevitably end up with shallow "solutions" which
will not be long lasting. If we had understood the Armenian tragedy,
we would not have become mired in the Kurdish question. Unless we
question our past, some people will try to restore the "deep state"
once again, some people will try to re-establish the PKK sometime in
the future. Everything depends on severing the moral bases of these
terrible structures, and this depends on an open confrontation with
everything in the past. Can we start?

http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-18252

Chief Prosecutor Slams Armenian Lawyers

CHIEF PROSECUTOR SLAMS ARMENIAN LAWYERS
Anush Martirosian

Armenialiberty.org
http://www.azatuty un.am/content/article/1787458.html
July 28 2009

Prosecutor-General Aghvan Hovsepian has lashed out at Armenian defense
attorneys, saying that many of them do not seek justice and behave with
"impudence" in court to make a name for themselves. The harsh criticism
drew an angry rebuttal from the head of Armenia’s bar association.

"Sometimes lawyers’ defense is aimed at not defending their client but
forming their own image," Hovsepian said in a speech late on Monday.

"I would like to see quality lawyers and have worthy rivals [of
prosecutors] in Armenia. Not people who try to show just how good
they are by disrespecting the court," he added.

The powerful prosecutor appeared to single out defense lawyers in the
high-profile trials of dozens of opposition members and supporters that
were arrested following last year’s disputed presidential election. At
least four of those lawyers walked out of courts in protest against
what they see illegal decisions taken by judges against their
clients. They were subsequently charged with contempt of court and
now face a ban on legal practice and up to three years’ imprisonment.

Armenia — Ruben Sahakian, chairman of the Armenian Chamber of
Advocates.Ruben Sahakian, a veteran lawyer heading the Armenian
Chamber Of Advocates, countered on Tuesday that his colleagues’
defiant statements and actions were justified because of what he sees
as unprecedented violations of due process. "I witnessed a cynical,
savage and hooligan behavior and impudent violations of law on the
part of both judges and prosecutors," he told RFE/RL.

Sahakian claimed that Armenia’s security apparatus and judiciary have
grown "mired in violations." "Mr. Prosecutor-General, let us jointly
analyze those violations in the presence of media representatives,"
he said, challenging Hovsepian.

Armenian judges rarely make decisions going against the will of the
government and prosecutors, and this has been particularly true for
their handling of the controversial criminal cases against jailed
oppositionists. Many of them were given prison sentences solely on
the basis of police testimony, a practice strongly condemned by local
and international human rights organizations.

Armenian courts have also ignored torture allegations made by some
witnesses in the politically charged trials. Those witnesses claimed
to have been forced to falsely incriminate oppositionists and retracted
their pre-trial testimony in the court.

NKR Security Guarantees Can’t Be Less Than Existing

NKR SECURITY GUARANTEES CAN’T BE LESS THAN EXISTING

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
28.07.2009 18:29 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "Authorities of Nagorno Karabakh have not received
an official document on Madrid principles, and that is why Stepanakert
has not made an official statement so far," Khosrov Haroutyunyan,
leader of the Christian Democratic Union and a member of the RA
President’s Public Council, told a press conference in Yerevan today.

According to Harutyunyan, Nagorno Karabakh has some concerns in respect
to Madrid principles, and particularly, to security of NKR. "These
concerns do not mean a waiver of the entire document, but rather
aimed at continuing negotiations over NKR’s security," he said.

Khosrov Harutyunian believes that security guarantees to NKR to be
included in the Madrid principles, can’t be less than existing today.

"Both authorities and public sector in Nagorno Karabakh believe that
negotiations cannot result in the status of NKR which is less than
the actual to date", he said.

VivaCell MTS And The ICRC-Armenia Sign MoU

VIVACELL MTS AND THE ICRC-ARMENIA SIGN MOU

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
28.07.2009 14:59 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ On July 31th, VivaCell MTS and The International
Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) will sign a memorandum
of understanding. VivaCell MTS and the Armenian Branch of the
International Red Cross will organize activities aimed at preventing
AIDS and HIV infection. Informational materials will be distributed
and social events will be organized.

Boards with brief information about AIDS and HIV infection were
established in all regions of Armenia.

Representatives of both organizations will undergo blood analysis
for research on HIV infection.

Armenia To Host A Group Of Turkish Youths On July 26-29

ARMENIA TO HOST A GROUP OF TURKISH YOUTHS ON JULY 26-29

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
27.07.2009 17:50 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Since April 2009, "The future is yours" social
organization has been implementing a program entitled "Tolerance
through cultural and educational dialogues". The program aims at
establishment of dialogue between Armenian and Turkish youth, based
on tolerance and democratic values.

Armenia will host a group of Turkish youths on July 26-29 within
program framework. The 3-day visit will feature interactive games,
dialogues on Armenian and Turkish culture, visits to museums and
galleries. Young people from Turkey will meet RA Deputy Foreign
Minister Arman Kirakosyan, US Ambassador to RA Marie Yovanovitch,
Acting Head of OSCE Office in Yerevan Carel Hofstra.

Araik Sargsyan: No Madrid Document Should Be Signed

ARAIK SARGSYAN: NO MADRID DOCUMENT SHOULD BE SIGNED
Anna Nazaryan

"Radiolur"
27.07.2009 17:56

"We do not have to sign any Madrid Document. We do not have to speak
about any mutual concessions and generally, make any step towards
resolution of the Karabakh issue," member of the presidium of the
Russian Academy of Geopolitical Studies, academician Araik Sargsyan
considers.

The studies of the academy have shown that events expected in the
South Caucasus, Middle East and Central Asia within the coming 3-5
years will result in geopolitical rearrangements. The studies hint
that the status quo should be maintained, the academician added.

The academician sees two scenarios of development of events in the
Karabakh issue. The first one is the Russian-Azerbaijani scenario
connected with the interests of Russian Gazprom and the intention to
fail the Nabucco program.

According to Araik Sargsyan, the second one is the Azerbaijani
scenario, based on the interests of the British Petroleum. This
scenario smells with blackmail and a threat of resumption of
war. However, the resumption of military actions is little possible,
because Britain is in a hard financial and economic condition and
cannot help Azerbaijan.

Ergenekon subgroup dealt big blow

Ergenekon subgroup dealt big blow

25.07.2009
News
EMRULLAH BAYRAK ANKARA

1951-ergenekon-subgroup-dealt-big-blow.html

Turki sh police on Friday detained nearly 200 suspected members of an
outlawed fundamentalist organization, Hizb ut-Tahrir (Party of
Liberation) in simultaneous raids in 23 provinces across Turkey.

The detentions came as a serious blow to the Ergenekon terrorist
organization, which is accused of planning a military coup against the
government. Ergenekon is known to have close links to a number of
outlawed groups, including the Turkish branch of Hizb ut-Tahrir.

Yesterday’s detentions were mainly in Konya, Kocaeli and
Å=9Eanlıurfa, along with Ä°stanbul and Ankara. Police said they
confiscated a number of documents linking the suspects to the
fundamentalist group. Hizb ut-Tahrir is an extremist group seeking to
reinstate the Islamic caliphate.

The suspects were sent to the counterterrorism unit in Ankara’s police
department for interrogation. According to police sources, the
organization was preparing for a number of terrorist attacks to
heighten tension in the country. The operations came in the wake of a
police investigation of more than six months.

Some of the suspects shouted: `Allow us to tell the truth. Democracy
will be abolished. Shariah rule will come,’ as they were taken into
custody.

POLICE DETAIN NEARLY 200 SUSPECTS IN FUNDAMENTALIST, TERRORIST
HIZB UT-TAHRIR SWEEP

Hizb ut-Tahrir was founded in 1953 in Jerusalem by Taqiuddin
al-Nabhani, an Islamic scholar. Since then the organization has spread
to more than 40 countries and by one estimate has around 1 million
members. The close ties between Hizb ut-Tahrir and Ergenekon were
exposed in the second Ergenekon indictment.. Dozens of Ergenekon
suspects are currently standing trial, including retired and active
duty military members, businessmen and journalists.

According to the Ergenekon indictment, Ergenekon leaders used
terrorist organizations in Turkey from all backgrounds, worldviews and
political ideologies for their ultimate aim to create chaos in the
country, which they hoped would make it easier to realize their
ultimate goal of triggering a military intervention.

The evidence suggests that the group had links with the terrorist
Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), the extreme-left Revolutionary
People’s Liberation Party/Front (DHKP/C), the fundamentalist
organization Hizbullah, the ultranationalist Turkish Revenge Brigade
(TÄ°T), the Turkish Workers’ and Peasants’ Liberation Army (TÄ°KKO),
the Marxist-Leninist Communist Party (MLKP) and the Hizb ut-Tahrir.

Several other suspected members of Hizb ut-Tahrir have been arrested
in the past across Turkey on charges of being members of an outlawed
organization and planning bloody attacks against civilians.

The group has been undergoing a restructuring for some time, which
compelled police to closely monitor its suspected members. The Turkish
branch of Hizb ut-Tahrir is mainly based in Ä°stanbul’s Bahçelievler
district.

Police said the group was planning to stage a large attack in
Ä°stanbul on the anniversary of the abolishment of the caliphate. The
Ottoman caliphate was abolished by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, the founder
of the modern Republic of Turkey, on March 3, 1924, following the
establishment of a secular state.

The group’s members in Turkey reportedly paid frequent visits to
Indonesia, where they attended seminaries and conferences on the
group’s structure and principles.

http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-18

Richard Giragosian: Relations Could Be Normalized By Novermber

RICHARD GIRAGOSIAN: RELATIONS COULD BE NORMALIZED BY NOVEMBER

AZG DAILY
22-07-2009

"The performance will be over in November after the football match
between the national teams of Armenia and Turkey and the meeting of the
Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan Serzh Sargsyan and Ilham Aliyev,
Richard Giragosian, Director of the Armenian Center for National and
International Studies (ACNIS), told a press conference today.

Richard Giragosian considers that the meetings between the Armenian and
Azerbaijani Presidents have revealed something very important: there
is pressure from Russia, EU and the United States, but a pressure to
establish Armenian-Turkish relations. Although these are two different
processes, they are interconnected.

What developments are expected after the football match in October
preceded by another meeting between the Presidents of Armenia and
Azerbaijan? According to Richard Giragosian, Turkey does not know what
it wants, but there will be certain pressures. Therefore, "there is a
great possibility that the relations will be normalized, but it will
bring no relief." "Even if the borders are not opened, it doesn’t
matter. The borders of mind are already open," Richard Giragosian said.

(ACNIS) Director considers that Karabakh’s participation in the
talks is the only way for resolution of the Karabakh issue. As for
the Madrid Principles, some provisions are good for Armenia, others
are not. "However, we should not neglect the danger," he said.

One should expect real threats from Moscow in case of Russia-US
rapprochement, the analyst considers, adding that the treachery of
friend sis the most dangerous.

Richard Giragosian assessed Ilham Aliyev’s threat to resume war as
an alarm to the whole world, since the statement was made in London,
not Baku.

Excavations To Prove Armenian Traces In Karabakh

EXCAVATIONS TO PROVE ARMENIAN TRACES IN KARABAKH
Lena Badeyan

"Radiolur"
20.07.2009 17:45

While the world powers and politicians are trying to resolve the
Karabakh issue, historians and archeologists are trying to prove that
the territory has been originally Armenian. The Armenian specialists
reached the greatest success in 2005, when they found one of the four
Tigranakert cities founded by Armenian King Tigran the Great on the
liberated land of Aghdam, to the southeast of Martaket region.

"For me this is Troy, this is how I would assess it. We continue
finding different items here, but it’s not the most important. What’s
important is that the city once existed here," said Vardges Safaryan,
member of the Tigranakert expedition, assessing the political and
historical essence of the diggings.

"The two main walls and the towels of the Hellenic city have been
discovered. The city was founded in the 80s B.C. and survived through
the 15th century, about 1 500 years. That is whey here we have not
only Hellenic monuments, but also Christian ones. We have discovered
an Armenian church built in 5-7th centuries, where we found one of
the most interesting items last year – a clay disk-like item with an
engraving: "Me, Vache, the slave of God." This inscription dates back
to the 6-7th centuries and it is the most ancient Armenian inscription
found on the20land of Karabakh up to now," Vardges Safaryan said.

The authorities of Nagorno Karabakh also attach great importance to
the excavations of Tigranakert and the government has been financing
the works for about two years.