CIS observers: presidential elections in Armenia in line with electo

CIS observers: presidential elections in Armenia in line with electoral code

YEREVAN, February 19. /ARKA/. The presidential elections in Armenia
are proceeding in line with the provisions of the acting Electoral
Code, Secretary General of the Commonwealth of Independent States
(CIS) and the Head of the CIS observer mission in the presidential
elections Sergey Lebedev said.

During his meeting with Armenia’s President Robert Kocharyan Lebedev
said that CIS observers are carrying out their mission in different
polling station, and talk to members of electoral commissions and
authorized representatives of the contenders, the presidential press
service reported.

President Kocharyan, in his turn, said that the authorities have taken
all the required measure to ensure normal elections in the country.

The interlocutors expressed confidence that the elections will be
held successfully, quietly and with no incidents.

During their meeting Kocharyan and Lebedev also addressed the informal
summit of CIS-member countries to be held in Moscow on February 22.

On Tuesday February 19 national presidential elections are held in
Armenia with nine candidates running for presidency. All 1,923 polling
stations are open for voters from 8:00am to 8:00pm local time.

According to the country’s Police, 2,328,320 voters have the right
to participate in the countrywide voting.

About 14,000 observers from 39 local and 6 international organizations
are watching the course of the elections in the country. N.V. -0–

Comment – Why don’t pilots take icing seriously?

Flight International
Feb 18 2008

Comment – Why don’t pilots take icing seriously?

By David Learmount

Icing is an operator problem that never goes away. An extensive study
by this magazine (Flight International, 27 September-3 October 2005)
found that although researchers continue to look for an anti-icing
silver bullet, we are where we were in the 1950s – nothing radical
has changed.

That’s why icing is an operator problem or – to be specific – a pilot
problem. The manufacturers do their best, tweaking designs, systems
and operating manual advice to try to improve things, but there’s
only so much they can do. Pilots, on the other hand, operate where
the problem is: they can see and feel the weather, they can see and –
literally – feel the aircraft.

"Strange as it may seem, a very light coating of snow or ice, light
enough to be hardly visible, will have a tremendous effect on
reducing the performance of a modern airplane." Those words were
spoken in 1939 by Jerry Lederer, founder of the Flight Safety
Foundation. They were echoed in February 2005 in a US Federal
Aviation Administration airworthiness directive, which pointed out:
"Even small amounts of frost, ice, snow or slush on the wing
leading-edges or forward upper wing surfaces can cause loss of
control at take-off."

It is not official that the Yerevan Bombardier CRJ100 accident at
take-off – spectacular but, fortunately, not fatal – was caused by
airframe icing, but it is difficult to imagine what else it was
likely to have been, given the aircraft’s behaviour and the fact that
conditions at the time were classic for icing.

Icing is a perennial killer. Why do pilots still not take its risks
seriously?

221594/comment-why-dont-pilots-take-icing-seriousl y.html

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/02/18/

BAKU: Khazar Ibragim: NK an interstate conflict, Kosovo internal one

Today, Azerbaijan
Feb 18 2008

Khazar Ibragim: "Nagorno Karabakh is an interstate conflict, while
Kosovo is an internal one"

18 February 2008 [16:34] – Today.Az

Azerbaijan does not support anyone in the issue of Kosovo’s
unilateral declaration of independence.

The due announcement was made by Khazar Ibragim, spokesman for
Azerbaijan’s Foreign Ministry, in an answer to reporters’ questions
regarding polarization of positions on the Kosovo issue between the
states.

`Azerbaijan’s position is based on its national interests. It shows
that Azerbaijan respects international law and understands its items
properly. Supporting somebody, or building policy in any direction is
out of question. Azerbaijan prefers its national interests,
Azerbaijan is an independent and a self-reliant state and will always
act in line with its interests and international law,’ he said.

Commenting on the deployment of forces in Kosovo by some
international organizations, Khazar Ibrahim said if the international
organizations – European Union and others pass decision on deploying
any forces in Kosovo, this process should be in the framework of
relevant international documents.

`Unlike the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, Kosovo is not a conflict
between states. Nagorno Karabakh conflict has been recognized as
Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict by the international community and
Azerbaijani and Armenian presidents participate in the talks called
the Prague process for the peaceful settlement of the conflict,’ he
said.

/APA/

URL:

http://www.today.az/news/politics/43187.html

Crew of Crashed Belarusian aircraft acted competently, Minsk says

Crew of Belarusian aircraft which crashed in Yerevan acted competently,
Minsk says

2008-02-17 15:56:00

ArmInfo. It is not the fault of the crew of Belavia air company’s
aircraft, which crashed in Yerevan last week, the Transport Ministry of
Belarus says.

"The aircrew acted competently, distinctly following the flight
operation instruction for this type of aircraft", Head of the Aviation
Department of the Transport Ministry of Belarus Vadim Melnik said to
Interfax, Sunday. "In that situation the Belarusian pilots’ actions
were absolutely competent", he stressed. Melnik came to Moscow to
coordinate the interdepartmental group of experts set up to investigate
the circumstances of the air crash in Yerevan. "The specified data will
be known in a couple of weeks", he noted. Melnik also pointed out that
the special equipment allowing to thoroughly decode the flight
recorders’ content is in Moscow.

It was reported that a passenger airplane flying from Yerevan to Minsk
crashed in Zvartnots airport, Thursday. Having built up speed on the
takeoff strip, the airplane crew members on board of Belavia Company’s
airplane SRJ-100LR. The passengers were the citizens of Belarus,
Armenia, Georgia, Russia and Ukraine. There were no victims. 7 injured
people were hospitalized in Yerevan. The Transport Prosecutor’s Office
of Belarus reported that a criminal case was instituted according to
Article 314, Part 1 of the Criminal Code of Belarus "Violation of
safety rules of service or operation of railway, air or water
transport".

European leader supports headscarf change

United Press International UPI
Feb 15 2008

European leader supports headscarf change

Published: Feb. 15, 2008 at 5:11 PM
BRUSSELS, Feb. 15 (UPI) — The leader of the Christian Democratic
bloc in the European Parliament says adult women in Turkey should be
able to choose to wear headscarves.

Joseph Daul, elected from France, told the Turkish newspaper Today’s
Zaman that he does not oppose Turkey’s reversing its ban on wearing
headscarves in universities. In France, headscarves are banned in
schools but adults are free to make their own decisions, he added.

With 289 parliamentary representatives, the Christian Democrats are
the largest group in the European body.

Daul also said that he might support admitting Turkey to the European
Union and thinks negotiations for Turkish membership should continue.
That puts him at odds with his own president, Nicolas Sarkozy, and
German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the most powerful Christian Democrat
on the continent.

On one difficult issue, recognition of the massacre of Turkish
Armenians during World War I, Daul said that he believes what
happened was a genocide. But he said that Turkey should be given time
to deal with its own history and not be penalized 90 years after the
fact.

Paid Air Is The Most Attractive For Candidates

PAID AIR IS THE MOST ATTRACTIVE FOR CANDIDATES

Panorama.am
20:05 14/02/2008

Yerevan Press Club President Boris Navasardyan said the debates are
lowly assessed in the media programs.

He said so in a press conference today. According to the results
of a monitoring, in the course of ten days, candidates or their
representatives participated in such programs only 28 times. In
Navasardyan’s assessment, this indicator is even low than the result
reported on January 21 to 30.

Navasardyan also spoke about the monitoring conducted by international
Ecoforum. "We believe the print media and that the electronic media
act differently in Armenia and to monitor them together was an obvious
mistake," he said.

>From January 31 to February 9 Vahan Hovanisyan remains the leader in
gross volume of campaign material, followed by Arthur Baghdasaryan
and Levon Ter-Petrosyan. In the second ten day, the paid air is the
most attractive for the candidates at H1. H1 is followed by Armenia,
ALM, Shant, H2, Yerkir Media and Kentron. The least attractive is
the air on the public radio.

Those, Who Do Not Pay The Cost For Independence, Silently Leave The

THOSE, WHO DO NOT PAY THE COST FOR INDEPENDENCE, SILENTLY LEAVE THE HISTORIC STAGE
Tatul Hakobyan

"Radiolur"
14.02.2008 16:19

Twenty years ago on these days the Armenian people was experiencing
national revival. The struggle for unification of Armenia and Artsakh
had started in Nagorno Karabakh, Armenia and the Diaspora. The
struggle continues and will continue until justice is restored and
until Nagorno Karabakh acquires its right to be free and independent.

At the end of 1988 the Armenians mainly assembled at the Opera
Square. Like magnet the Opera Square was attracting Armenians from
Yerevan, other cities and villages. The February of 1988 and the
following two years can be considered one of the brightest pages in
Armenian history. In those years the Movement was still pure, there was
nothing mercenary in it. People were ready to sacrifice their lives
for the sake of the Movement. People gathered at the square thought
the Karabakh issue would be solved soon and believed that Moscow would
transfer the region to Armenia, thus restoring the historical justice.

Twenty years have passed, but the Karabakh talks still go on, since
Azerbaijan psychologically cannot get used to the loss of Nagorno
Karabakh, which was under its jurisdiction in Soviet times. Why do
we celebrate February 20 as the day of the Movement? Because on that
day, the Council of the Autonomous Region of Nagorno Karabakh made
a decision unprecedented for a totalitarian Soviet country, when
the majority of the MPs voted in favor of applying to Azerbaijan
and Armenia, as well as the Supreme Council of the Soviet Union,
suggesting to transfer the region to Armenia.

In reality, however, the Movement had started much earlier. It had
started after the illegal decision taken in July 1921, when under
Stalin’s patronage the Caucasus Bureau annexed the region with 95%
of Armenian population to Soviet Azerbaijan. If the question refers
to the contemporary Karabakh struggle, it kicked off after 1985,
when Mikhail Gorbachev declared about his theses of "restructuring,
openness and acceleration," commonly known as "perestroika, glasnost
and uskorenie."

Gorbachev’s policy on Nagorno Karabakh was incorrectly interpreted.

Behind those words our compatriots in Artsakh saw an opportunity to
get rid of Azerbaijani rule and join Armenia in a legitimate way.

In 1987 tens of thousand of signatures were collected to be sent
to Moscow.

These signatures were some kind of a referendum, with which Artsakhi
Armenians wished to withdraw from Azerbaijani rure. At the end of
1987 delegations of Artsakhi intellectuals started visiting Moscow. In
those times ecological strikes were underway in Yerevan, during which
the topic of Karabakh was gradually appearing.

The first demonstration took place in Hadrut on February 12, 1988. The
next day it moved to Stepanakert. Thus, the train started off. However,
this was not a simple move: the Armenian people was to pay a very high
price for the 20 years to follow. The war penetrated into everyone’s
homes. Sure, the peaceful population of the conflict zone suffered
most. But that was the price for independence and freedom. Peoples,
who do not pay the price, silently leave the historic stage.

Boxing: Sadorra tackles Russian IM; Gomez faces Armenian

The Inquirer, Philippines
Feb 15 2008

Sadorra tackles Russian IM; Gomez faces Armenian

Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 05:31:00 02/15/2008

MANILA, Philippines — Filipino International Master Julio Catalino
Sadorra battles Russian IM Konstantin Maslak while IM John Paul Gomez
tackles Armenian FIDE Master Samvel Ter-Sahakyan at the start of the
Aeroflot Open 2008 International Chess Festival in Moscow on
Thursday.

Sadorra and Gomez are both eyeing their second Grandmaster results in
the A2 division confined to players with ELO ratings of less than
2550 but higher than 2399.

The Singapore-based Sadorra is ranked 65th in the tough event with
his ELO rating of 2423 while Maslak is ranked 19th with an ELO of
2510.

Gomez, a last-minute replacement for GM Mark Paragua who failed to
complete his travel documents on time, is ranked 40th with his ELO of
2469 while Sahakyan is No. 86 with 2369.

Russian GMs Semen Dvoirys and Alexei Iljushin, both with ELO ratings
of 2549, are the top two seeds in the A2 division while Armenian
Super-GM Vladimir Akopian is the top pick in the A1 division with his
ELO of 2700.

The National Chess Federation of the Philippines headed by Prospero
`Butch’ Pichay funded the Filipinos’ participation.

The A2 division champion gets $12,000, the runner-up $8,000, the
third placer $5,000, the fourth placer $2,500 and the fifth placer
$1,500. Marlon Bernardino, contributor

Russia And Armenia To Cooperate In Geological Surveys

RUSSIA AND ARMENIA TO COOPERATE IN GEOLOGICAL SURVEYS

RosBusinessConsulting
Feb 13 2008
Russia

RBC, 13.02.2008, Yerevan 17:28:41.A joint Armenian-Russian venture for
geological survey of uranium ores is expected to be formed in March
2008, the republic’s Environmental Protection Ministry reported today,
adding that a suitable office was to be found for the new company’s
headquarters. The joint venture’s equity capital is estimated at
$300,000 and will be owned by the governments of the two countries
on a parity basis. Armenis is to participate in the joint venture by
supplying resources and preparing promotional documents. Meanwhile,
a total of $3m is to be spent for four geological surveys in 2008,
the Armenian news agency ARMINFO reported today.

The document on the creation of the joint venture is scheduled to be
signed in February 2008 during Russian Prime Minister Viktor Zubkov’s
visit to Yerevan. The surveys are to be launched in the fall. state
nuclear corporation Rosatom estimates Armenia’s uranium deposits at
30,000 tonnes.

For Sale: West’s Deadly Nuclear Secrets

FOR SALE: WEST’S DEADLY NUCLEAR SECRETS

AZG Armenian Daily
14/02/2008

International

Insight: Chris Gourlay, Jonathan Calvert, Joe Lauria

A WHISTLEBLOWER has made a series of extraordinary claims about how
corrupt government officials allowed Pakistan and other states to
steal nuclear weapons secrets.

Sibel Edmonds, a 37-year-old former Turkish language translator for
the FBI, listened into hundreds of sensitive intercepted conversations
while based at the agency’s Washington field office.

She approached The Sunday Times last month after reading about an
Al-Qaeda terrorist who had revealed his role in training some of the
9/11 hijackers while he was in Turkey.

Edmonds described how foreign intelligence agents had enlisted the
support of US officials to acquire a network of moles in sensitive
military and nuclear institutions.

Among the hours of covert tape recordings, she says she heard evidence
that one well-known senior official in the US State Department was
being paid by Turkish agents in Washington who were selling the
information on to black market buyers, including Pakistan.

The name of the official – who has held a series of top government
posts – is known to The Sunday Times.

He strongly denies the claims.

However, Edmonds said: "He was aiding foreign operatives against US
interests by passing them highly classified information, not only
from the State Department but also from the Pentagon, in exchange
for money, position and political objectives."

She claims that the FBI was also gathering evidence against senior
Pentagon officials – including household names – who were aiding
foreign agents.

"If you made public all the information that the FBI have on this case,
you will see very high-level people going through criminal trials,"
she said.

Her story shows just how much the West was infiltrated by foreign
states seeking nuclear secrets. It illustrates how western government
officials turned a blind eye to, or were even helping, countries such
as Pakistan acquire bomb technology.

The wider nuclear network has been monitored for many years by a
joint Anglo-American intelligence effort.

But rather than shut it down, investigations by law enforcement bodies
such as the FBI and Britain’s Revenue & Customs have been aborted to
preserve diplomatic relations.

Edmonds, a fluent speaker of Turkish and Farsi, was recruited by the
FBI in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Her previous claims
about incompetence inside the FBI have been well documented in America.

She has given evidence to closed sessions of Congress and the 9/11
commission, but many of the key points of her testimony have remained
secret. She has now decided to divulge some of that information after
becoming disillusioned with the US authorities’ failure to act.

One of Edmonds’s main roles in the FBI was to translate thousands of
hours of conversations by Turkish diplomatic and political targets
that had been covertly recorded by the agency.

A backlog of tapes had built up, dating back to 1997, which were needed
for an FBI investigation into links between the Turks and Pakistani,
Israeli and US targets. Before she left the FBI in 2002 she heard
evidence that pointed to money laundering, drug imports and attempts
to acquire nuclear and conventional weapons technology.

"What I found was damning," she said. "While the FBI was investigating,
several arms of the government were shielding what was going on."

The Turks and Israelis had planted "moles" in military and academic
institutions which handled nuclear technology. Edmonds says there
were several transactions of nuclear material every month, with the
Pakistanis being among the eventual buyers. "The network appeared
to be obtaining information from every nuclear agency in the United
States," she said.

They were helped, she says, by the high-ranking State Department
official who provided some of their moles – mainly PhD students
– with security clearance to work in sensitive nuclear research
facilities. These included the Los Alamos nuclear laboratory in
New Mexico, which is responsible for the security of the US nuclear
deterrent.

In one conversation Edmonds heard the official arranging to pick
up a $15,000 cash bribe. The package was to be dropped off at an
agreed location by someone in the Turkish diplomatic community who
was working for the network.

The Turks, she says, often acted as a conduit for the Inter-Services
Intelligence (ISI), Pakistan’s spy agency, because they were less
likely to attract suspicion. Venues such as the American Turkish
Council in Washington were used to drop off the cash, which was picked
up by the official.

Edmonds said: "I heard at least three transactions like this over a
period of 2½ years. There are almost certainly more."

The Pakistani operation was led by General Mahmoud Ahmad, then the
ISI chief.

Intercepted communications showed Ahmad and his colleagues stationed
in Washington were in constant contact with attache in the Turkish
embassy.

Intelligence analysts say that members of the ISI were close
to Al-Qaeda before and after 9/11. Indeed, Ahmad was accused of
sanctioning a $100,000 wire payment to Mohammed Atta, one of the 9/11
hijackers, immediately before the attacks.

The results of the espionage were almost certainly passed to Abdul
Qadeer Khan, the Pakistani nuclear scientist.

Khan was close to Ahmad and the ISI. While running Pakistan’s nuclear
programme, he became a millionaire by selling atomic secrets to Libya,
Iran and North Korea. He also used a network of companies in America
and Britain to obtain components for a nuclear programme.

Khan caused an alert among western intelligence agencies when his aides
met Osama Bin Laden. "We were aware of contact between A Q Khan’s
people and Al-Qaeda," a former CIA officer said last week. "There
was absolute panic when we initially discovered this, but it kind of
panned out in the end."

It is likely that the nuclear secrets stolen from the United States
would have been sold to a number of rogue states by Khan.

Edmonds was later to see the scope of the Pakistani connections when
it was revealed that one of her fellow translators at the FBI was the
daughter of a Pakistani embassy official who worked for Ahmad. The
translator was given top secret clearance despite protests from FBI
investigators.

Edmonds says packages containing nuclear secrets were delivered by
Turkish operatives, using their cover as members of the diplomatic and
military community, to contacts at the Pakistani embassy in Washington.

Following 9/11, a number of the foreign operatives were taken in for
questioning by the FBI on suspicion that they knew about or somehow
aided the attacks.

Edmonds said the State Department official once again proved useful. "A
primary target would call the official and point to names on the list
and say, ‘We need to get them out of the US because we can’t afford
for them to spill the beans’," she said. "The official said that he
would ‘take care of it’."

The four suspects on the list were released from interrogation and
extradited.

Edmonds also claims that a number of senior officials in the Pentagon
had helped Israeli and Turkish agents.

"The people provided lists of potential moles from Pentagon-related
institutions who had access to databases concerning this information,"
she said.

"The handlers, who were part of the diplomatic community, would then
try to recruit those people to become moles for the network. The
lists contained all their ‘hooking points’, which could be financial
or sexual pressure points, their exact job in the Pentagon and what
stuff they had access to."

One of the Pentagon figures under investigation was Lawrence Franklin,
a former Pentagon analyst, who was jailed in 2006 for passing US
defence information to lobbyists and sharing classified information
with an Israeli diplomat.

"He was one of the top people providing information and packages
during 2000 and 2001," she said.

Once acquired, the nuclear secrets could have gone anywhere. The FBI
monitored Turkish diplomats who were selling copies of the information
to the highest bidder.

Edmonds said: "Certain greedy Turkish operators would make copies of
the material and look around for buyers. They had agents who would
find potential buyers."

In summer 2000, Edmonds says the FBI monitored one of the agents
as he met two Saudi Arabian businessmen in Detroit to sell nuclear
information that had been stolen from an air force base in Alabama. She
overheard the agent saying: "We have a package and we’re going to
sell it for $250,000."

Edmonds’s employment with the FBI lasted for just six months. In
March 2002 she was dismissed after accusing a colleague of covering
up illicit activity involving Turkish nationals.

She has always claimed that she was victimised for being outspoken
and was vindicated by an Office of the Inspector General review of
her case three years later. It found that one of the contributory
reasons for her sacking was that she had made valid complaints.

The US attorney-general has imposed a state secrets privilege order
on her, which prevents her revealing more details of the FBI’s methods
and current investigations.

Her allegations were heard in a closed session of Congress, but no
action has been taken and she continues to campaign for a public
hearing.

She was able to discuss the case with The Sunday Times because,
by the end of January 2002, the justice department had shut down
the programme.

The senior official in the State Department no longer works there. Last
week he denied all of Edmonds’s allegations: "If you are calling me
to say somebody said that I took money, that’s outrageous . . . I do
not have anything to say about such stupid ridiculous things as this."

In researching this article, The Sunday Times has talked to two FBI
officers (one serving, one former) and two former CIA sources who
worked on nuclear proliferation. While none was aware of specific
allegations against officials she names, they did provide overlapping
corroboration of Edmonds’s story.

One of the CIA sources confirmed that the Turks had acquired nuclear
secrets from the United States and shared the information with Pakistan
and Israel. "We have no indication that Turkey has its own nuclear
ambitions. But the Turks are traders. To my knowledge they became
big players in the late 1990s," the source said.

How Pakistan got the bomb, then sold it to the highest bidders

1965 Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, Pakistan’s foreign minister, says: "If
India builds the bomb we will eat grass . .

. but we will get one of our own"

1974 Nuclear programme becomes increased priority as India tests a
nuclear device

1976 Abdul Qadeer Khan, a scientist, steals secrets from Dutch uranium
plant. Made head of his nation’s nuclear programme by Bhutto, now
prime minister

1976 onwards Clandestine network established to obtain materials and
technology for uranium enrichment from the West

1985 Pakistan produces weapons-grade uranium for the first time

1989-91 Khan’s network sells Iran nuclear weapons information and
technology

1991-97 Khan sells weapons technology to North Korea and Libya

1998 India tests nuclear bomb and Pakistan follows with a series of
nuclear tests. Khan says: "I never had any doubts I was building a
bomb. We had to do it"

2001 CIA chief George Tenet gathers officials for crisis summit on the
proliferation of nuclear technology from Pakistan to other countries

2001 Weeks before 9/11, Khan’s aides meet Osama Bin Laden to discuss
an Al-Qaeda nuclear device

2001 After 9/11 proliferation crisis becomes secondary as Pakistan
is seen as important ally in war on terror

2003 Libya abandons nuclear weapons programme and admits acquiring
components through Pakistani nuclear scientists

2004 Khan placed under house arrest and confesses to supplying Iran,
Libya and North Korea with weapons technology. He is pardoned by
President Pervez Musharraf

2006 North Korea tests a nuclear bomb

2007 Renewed fears that bomb may fall into hands of Islamic extremists
as killing of Benazir Bhutto throws country into turmoil

"Azg" Daily newspaper is among the first ten most reliable mass
media sources.

"Azg" Daily newspaper is among the first ten most reliable mass media
sources. This is the conclusion of the public opinion poll held by
the pan-Armenian Association of Mass media in the second half of 2007.

About 100 leaders of 25 parties, 45 NGOs and entrepreneourships
participated in the public opinion poll. In the test they evaluated
the trustworthyness of the mass media sources by the five score system.

According to the degree of trustworthyness, the following mass media
sources are included in the first tenc of the list: "Liberty" Radio
Station, "Noyyan Tapan" News Agency, "Shant" TV company, "Aravot"
newspaper, "A1+" site, "ArmInfo" News Agency, "Azg" Daily Newspaper,
"ARKA" News Agency, "Armenianow" Internet Newspaper and "Kentron"
TV Channel.

–Boundary_(ID_t9/3sU++JJflKAlZ8nnBFA)–