Turkish Young People Protest Against Erdogan’s Statement

TURKISH YOUNG PEOPLE PROTEST AGAINST ERDOGAN’S STATEMENT

news.am
March 18 2010
Armenia

The statement Turkish Premier Recep Erdogan is evoking more and more
responses. Young people gathered in Galatasaray Square and severely
criticized Premier Erdogan and the members of the Grand National
Assembly representing the opposition anti-Armenian Republican People’s
Party (RPP) (Turkish: Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi (CHP)), particularly
the notorious Armenophobe Caman Aritman.

The Turkey-based Samanyolu news agency reported that the participants
in the action carried a placard with a photomontage, Talaat Pasha
with Erdogan’s head, with Canam Aritman besides him. An inscription
below said: "Erdogan: We will make Armenians go through Erzurum-Kars"
and Aritman: Naked and on foot."

Cener Kenar, who spoke at the meeting, said: "In those times they did
not ask: what would a state that responded to a Committee’s decision in
this way in 2010 have done in 1915? The state reflex has not changed
for 95 years. How many premiers have changed from Talaat Pasha to
Erdogan Pasha. The premier’s statements are against conscience and
international law. Are we advocates of Talaat Pasha or Enver Pasha? We
do not want to be grandchildren of Talaat, Enver, and all those that
organized Armenian pogroms. We want to be grandchildren of those who
hid Armenians in their homes thereby saving them from massacres,"
he said.

Commonwealth Of Militarized States

COMMONWEALTH OF MILITARIZED STATES
by Vladimir Mukhin

WPS Agency
What the Papers Say (Russia)
March 17, 2010 Wednesday
Russia

NOT EVEN THE CRISIS COMPELLED POST-SOVIET COUNTRIES TO RESTRICT ARMS
SPENDINGS; Militarization of the post-Soviet zone continues.

Post-Soviet zone retains an alarming conflict potential. Military
budgets of CIS states and Georgia show that armed conflicts are
particularly likely in the South Caucasus and Caucasus. As a matter of
fact, not even the CIS countries located far from areas of potential
conflicts economize on their regular armies. The impression is that
everyone is making preparations for an all-out war.

Post-Soviet countries’ aggregate GDP dropped 7% but their aggregate
arms spendings in USD increased 5% from 2009 and 15% from 2008.

Leaders in the regional arms race are Georgia (4.56% of the GDP),
Armenia (4.07%), Azerbaijan (3.95%), and Uzbekistan with Ukraine (3.5%
each). Along with that, only economies of Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan
displayed certain growth in 2009. All other countries finished the
year worse off then they had been. In Armenia, this deterioration
amounted to 15% – the worst throughout the Commonwealth.

It is fair to add meanwhile that these figures do not allow for
military aid to foreign allies. For example, military potential of
Armenia is augmented by the Defense Army of Nagorno-Karabakh. Sum total
of their arms expenditures therefore reach $600 million, according
to some estimates. It is logical of course because Karabakh conflict
resolution process is stuck. Besides, leadership of Azerbaijan keeps
making statements on a military solution to the problem, convinced
as it is that the Armenians occupy 20% of the territory of Azerbaijan.

Military potential of Azerbaijan is estimated at $9-10 billion
(9-10% of the GDP). Oil export revenues, intensive development of war
industry, and considerable mobilization designation reserve permit
Baku to boost this potential in case of need. No wonder the OSCE is
upset. Goran Lenmarker, OSCE Parliamentary Assembly’s Special Envoy
for Karabakh, commented the other day that Azerbaijan should sequester
its military budget as part of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict resolution
process. Lenmarker added that the procrastinated conflict was affecting
"economies of Armenia and Azerbaijan and people".

The Georgian GDP dropped in 2009 (the drop estimated at more than
$1 billion) but Mikhail Saakashvili’s regime does not appear to be
concerned. It spent $519 million on weapons and military hardware
in 2009 – and this figure does not even count military aid from the
United States and NATO. U.S. Undersecretary of State James Steinberg
said while visiting Tbilisi last month that the United States had kept
its promise of $1 billion worth of military aid to Georgia given in
the wake of the August war.

NATO is another generous contributor to Saakashvili’s war machine. The
Georgian-NATO Commission met in Brussels last week to discuss the 2010
program of cooperation. Deputy Premier Georgy Baramidze commented
that the program stood for continuation of democratic reforms and
reforms in the spheres of defense, economy, security, etc.

All things considered, it is hardly surprising that the Russian
leadership suspects Georgia capable of launching another offensive.

Fortunately, Moscow has been taking counter-measures. Military
infrastructure is being developed in runaway Abkhazia and South
Ossetia. Sum total of Russian military and economic aid to these
self-proclaimed sovereign states exceeds Georgia’s military budget.

Visiting Sukhumi last year, Premier Vladimir Putin promised 15-16
billion rubles for development of military bases and border protection
infrastructure in Abkhazia and South Ossetia in 2010.

Where Central Asia is concerned, Uzbekistan remains a heavy spender.

Its military budget this year will exceed the Kazakh even though the
Kazakh GDP is more than two Uzbek ones. In any event, Uzbekistan will
spend 3.5% of the GDP on weapons and military hardware and Kazakhstan
only 1%.

Tashkent’s motives are quite understandable. First, ethnic tension in
Uzbekistan is considerable. Neither does overpopulation make things
any easier despite economic successes. These potential threats
to the regime are negated by the extensive and powerful apparat
of repressions. Second, Tashkent is constantly at odds with its
neighbors, particularly Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Also importantly,
the Uzbek regime is aiding NATO contingents in the Uzbek-populated
northern provinces of Afghanistan. It is said that Islam Karimov is
after control over the adjacent Afghani provinces, and that requires
powerful military resources indeed.

Even Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, the poorest post-Soviet countries,
spend a great deal of weapons and military hardware. Their military
potentials heavily rely on aid from Russia, China, and some NATO
countries operating in Central Asia.

Military spendings of neutral Turkmenistan and Moldova this year remain
more or less unchanged since 2009. On the other hand, installation
of the so called "democratic coalition" in the corridors of power in
Kishinev may change everything yet. Made the defense minister last
year, Vitaly Marinuca announced that the demilitarization launched
by ex-president Voronin was a folly.

Marinuca added that the Pentagon had promised him some extensive
military personnel training programs.

Ukraine intends to up its military budget to $5.2 billion but that
remains to be seen yet. The 2010 budget was never adopted due to the
political chaos. What meager funds make it to the Ukrainian Armed
Forces are clearly insufficient for their current needs, much less
for development.

Crisis or not, Belarus kept its military budget on the last year
level (more than $900 million or 1.5% of the GDP). Several years ago,
official Minsk had boasted that by 2010 its military budget would
equal 2% of the GDP but that turned out to be one promise it never
kept. Anyway, military budget of the Russian-Belarussian union this
year will amount to $63 million or 39% of the whole budget.

Russian military expenditures in absolute figures will increase 3.4%
this year. The GDP fall and the higher dollar/ruble exchange rate,
however, show them drop almost $1.5 billion from what they were
in 2009.

Source: Nezavisimaya Gazeta, No 51, March 17, 2010, pp. 1-2

World Bank Reports On Energy Outlook In Eastern Europe And Central A

WORLD BANK REPORTS ON ENERGY OUTLOOK IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA REGION

ARKA
March 19, 2010

YEREVAN, March 19, /ARKA/. The outlook for primary energy supplies,
heat, and electricity is questionable for the Eastern Europe and
Central Asia region, despite Russia and Central Asia’s current role
as a major energy supplier to both Eastern and Western Europe. In
spite of the underlying resource base, the region as a whole will
face an energy crunch unless investments of more than $3 trillion are
made over the next 20 years, according to the new World Bank report,
Lights Out? The Energy Outlook in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet
Union, launched today.

"The demand for primary energy in the Europe and Central Asia region
is expected to increase by 50 percent by 2030," said Peter Thomson,
Director for Sustainable Development in the World Bank’s Europe and
Central Asia region, "while the demand for electricity is expected
to increase by 90 percent."

"Before the current global financial crisis hit in 2008," Thomson
explained, "several importing countries in the region had begun
to experience difficulties with supplies. The financial crisis has
slowed demand for energy and has created some breathing room to allow
countries to take action to mitigate the impact of the anticipated
energy crunch. But this window of opportunity will only exist for
about five to six years. Mitigating actions are required on both
the supply and the demand side, and without a change in behavior the
region as a whole could face an energy crunch – moving from being a
net energy exporter to a net energy importer by 2030."

Following the break-up of the Soviet Union, the countries of Europe
and Central Asia experienced six years of dramatic economic decline,
followed by vigorous economic recovery, enabling the region to become
one of the most economically dynamic in the world. This economic
performance was reflected in the region’s energy sector – the initial
economic decline was accompanied by a sharp reduction in the production
and consumption of energy. But as the region’s economy recovered,
both production and consumption increased. Investment, however,
lagged, particularly in energy asset maintenance and upgrading,
creating the prospect of an energy crunch.

The region was the hardest hit by the global financial crisis that
began in 2008, dampening energy demand significantly. This created
some breathing room, but this is only a temporary respite before
energy availability again becomes a serious concern. Once growth
picks back up, so, too, will energy consumption.

According to the report, if energy production is to be maintained or
increased to meet Europe’s energy requirements, significant investment
will be required. The projected needs for primary energy development
from 2010 to 2030 are estimated to be on the order of almost $1.3
trillion in order to ensure the availability of oil, gas, and coal. In
addition, the region’s power infrastructure is in desperate need of
upgrading. Electricity capacity has hardly increased since the early
1990s and plants are getting old. Investment needed in power sector
infrastructure over the next 20 to 25 years is on the order of $1.5
trillion, with a further $500 billion required for district heating.

"The deteriorating capacity has not yet become a full-blown crisis,"
said Thomson, "because of the decline in demand during the 1990s and
the current drop off in demand related to the financial crisis. But
construction lead times of several years mean that action is required
now. This level of investment – more than $3 trillion – cannot be
provided in this region by the public sector alone. Attracting private
sector investors will require changing the investment climate to make
it conducive to such investment."

Investing in energy efficiency achieves three goals, simultaneously
and at least cost: lower greenhouse gas emissions, better energy
security, and more sustainable economic growth. According to the
report, an additional $1 invested in energy efficiency may avoid more
than $2 in production investment. But much potential remains untapped
because of the many obstacles to investments in energy efficiency,
including inadequate energy prices and lack of payment discipline,
a lack of information on the latest technologies, too few contractors
and service companies, and financing constraints.

Governments have a major role to play in energy efficiency, not only
in allowing energy tariffs to reflect costs, but by being proactive in
setting and updating energy efficiency standards for homes, equipment,
and vehicles, and in enforcing them. The report recommends that to set
an example, governments should undertake energy efficiency programs
in the public sector, inform the public on energy efficient technology
options, and design cities with alternative means of transport.

The challenge for these countries going forward will be to secure
additional energy supplies quickly and at minimum cost, while acting in
an environmentally friendly fashion to limit the growth of greenhouse
gases.

According to the report, carbon emissions relative to GDP in the
region are among the highest in the world. In 2005, Russia was the
third-largest CO2 emitter in the world, after the United States and
China. The region’s EU members have already started tackling climate
change, improving energy efficiency, developing renewable energy
technologies, and tapping into carbon finance. Other countries in
the region will face increasing pressure to catch up, and quickly.

However, there is a disconnect between the global efforts to reduce
carbon emissions and the region’s national energy strategies for the
next 20 years. The region’s policymakers and businesses will have to
rethink these strategies and engage seriously in the global efforts.

But transitioning to a low carbon economy can be costly. By tapping
into carbon finance, countries in the region can reduce their carbon
footprint and attract critical capital to rebuild their energy
infrastructure and industrial base using efficient and cleaner
technologies. Governments should ensure that national policies
and legislation facilitate the use of carbon finance, foster rapid
technological modernization, and spur a revolution toward energy
efficiency.

The report emphasizes that given the enormous need for investment,
and the long lead times required to implement projects in the
energy sector, countries need to position themselves to secure
funding support for such progress as quickly as they can. Failure
to introduce an enabling environment to support investment in the
sector will translate into a shortfall in investment that, in turn,
could constrain economic activity. A 10 percent shortfall in energy
availability could lead to a 1 percent reduction in economic growth,
and a larger shortfall could have even more detrimental impacts.

"The World Bank stands ready to assist countries in meeting their
energy needs," said Thomson, "by helping them create an attractive
climate for investment, and by helping secure access to various sources
of funding, including carbon finance. However, countries need to act
swiftly – time is of the essence."

Armenian And Slovak FMs Open Armenian-Slovak Business-Forum In Yerev

ARMENIAN AND SLOVAK FMS OPEN ARMENIAN-SLOVAK BUSINESS-FORUM IN YEREVAN

ArmInfo
2010-03-18 18:28:00

ArmInfo. Today Armenian and Slovak FMs Edward Nalbandyan and Miroslav
Lajcak opened an Armenian-Slovak business-forum at Armenian Development
Agency in Yerevan.

Nalbandyan said that it was the first Armenian-Slovak business forum
and it would be a good basis for further cooperation. "I hope that
this forum will give an additional impulse to our trade-economic ties
and will be a good basis for joint business projects."

"Our countries have no problems and are successfully cooperating
at bilateral, regional and international levels. Unfortunately,
the current level of economic relations does not correspond to the
capacities our countries have in this field. However, if provided
with necessary conditions, these relations have quite good prospects,"
Nalbandyan said.

He pointed out that Armenia is interested in further developing its
economic cooperation with Slovakia with priority to be given to SME,
industry, tourism. The study of Slovakia’s experience, the use of
the country’s capacities, the training of specialists in the fields
of construction, wood-working, hydro-technologies, telecoms may
open up new wider prospects for Armenian businessmen. "In order to
deepen our economic cooperation, today, we have signed an agreement
on air communication and a memorandum for cooperation in the field
of European integration," Nalbandyan said.

He said that the ancient Slovak city of Bardejov was frequented by
Armenian merchants in the Middle Ages. There is a legend saying that
the tradition of hydrotherapy was brought in that city by Armenians.

Armenia closely cooperated with Slovakia when it was part of
Czechoslovakia. "We want do develop all of these traditions on the
basis of our present-day capacities," Nalbandyan said.

Lajcak said that Slovakia and Armenia have enjoyed stable political
dialogue in the last years. He is sure that this dynamics will
have a positive influence on bilateral trade-economic contacts and
will result in the conclusion of mutually beneficial contracts. The
Slovak businessmen who are accompanying Lajcak have come to study
the tare and market capacities of Armenia and to find partners for
joint projects. "In the politics, just like in the economy, we prefer
mutual respect, openness and pragmatism," Lajcak said.

In 2009 the Armenian-Slovak trade turnover dropped by 49.7% to
$10.4mln: Armenian export to Slovakia was $124,000, Slovak import into
Armenia – $10.2mln. In 2005-2009 the trade turnover totalled $49.6mln.

Armenia exports tobacco, iron, steel and imports electrical equipment,
tools and vehicles.

Revised Madrid Principles Lay Claims Against Armenia But Offers Noth

REVISED MADRID PRINCIPLES LAY CLAIMS AGAINST ARMENIA BUT OFFERS NOTHING IN EXCHANGE

ArmInfo
2010-03-16 17:24:00

ArmInfo. The revised Madrid Principles lay claims against Armenia
but offers nothing in exchange, the head of the Analytical Center
for Globalization and Cooperation Stepan Grigoryan said during a
press-conference today.

The principles say that the population of Nagorno-Karabakh should be
provided with security guarantees but the same document stipulates
deployment of peacekeeping forces without specifying the forces. The
revised Madrid principles are unacceptable for either Armenia or
NKR: the referendum has been placed in the background with the idea
of interim status brought into the spotlight. The deployment of
peacekeepers is also unacceptable.

In response Armenia must either toughen its position or insist on the
signing of a framework agreement based on the initial version of the
Madrid principles in line with the interests of Armenia and NKR.

Swedish Parliament Recognises the Armenian Genocide

EUROPEAN ARMENIAN FEDERATION For Justice & Democracy
Avenue de la Renaissance 10
B-1000 Bruxelles
Tel/ Fax: +32 2 732 70 27/26
Website :Eafjd [1]

PRESS RELEASE

_For immediate release_
TUESDAY 16 MARCH 2010

CONTACT : VARTENIE ECHO

TEL. / FAX. : +32 (0) 2 732 70 27
SWEDISH PARLIAMENT RECOGNISES THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE
Brussels-Stockholm- March 11, 2010

Spearheaded by a Swedish MP from the left party, Mr. Hans
Linde, the Swedish Parliament adopted on Thursday, March 11, 2010 a
resolution recognizing the Armenian, Assyrian/Syriac/Chaldean and
Pontic Greek genocides. This makes Sweden the 11th European country to
do so, following Germany, Belgium, Cyprus, Greece, France, Italy,
Lithuania, Poland, the Netherlands, Slovakia, as well as the European
Parliament.

With this vote, the Parliament confirms that _Sweden must
recognize the 1915 Armenian, Assyrian/Syriac/Chaldean and Pontic
Greek_ _genocide; that it must work with the European Union and the
United Nations for an international recognition as well as with
Turkey, so that the latter recognizes these genocides._

`We congratulate the Assyro-Chaldean and the Pontic Greek
populations, who along with the Armenians, were victims of genocide
perpetrated by the Turkish government. We commend the Swedish members
of Parliament for their courage against the pressures of the Turkish
lobby’ declared Hilda Tchoboian, President of the European Armenian
Federation for Justice and Democracy.

The European Armenian Federation wishes to underscore that
this vote, taken in spite of pressures and threats from the Turkish
government, one week after the vote of the US House of
Representatives, highlights the failure of Turkey’s policy of denial.

`Turkey manipulated the public opinion by signing the
protocols with Armenia in hopes of burying the Genocide issue; but its
position became intolerable in the face of the inescapable pursuit for
historical truth’ announced Hilda Tchoboian.

The Federation calls on the Swedish government to apply the
decisions of this parliamentary resolution in its bilateral relations
with Turkey, but also in its European policy, by applying them in its
official position regarding Turkey’s accession to the European Union.

STOCKHOLM: Reinfeldt Reassures Erdogan

SR International – Radio Sweden
March 14 2010

Reinfeldt Reassures Erdogan

Updated 16:00

The Swedish Government continues to distance itself from the decision
in the Swedish parliament to recognise the deaths of Armenians in the
Ottoman Empire as genocide.

In a phone call on Saturday, Sweden’s Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt
ensured his Turkish counterparts Recep Tayyip Erdogan that he did not
agree with the decision.

"I said I regretted the decision in parliament because of the bad
timing, since a reconciliation process has started, which is seen as
important by both parties, Armenians and Turkey," Reinfeldt told
Swedish Radio News at a press conference on Sunday, which he had
called to explain his position.

Also in his conversation with Erdogan, Reinfeldt said he expressed his
concern over what he fears is "a new foreign policy" where historical
events are turned into party politics, rather than leaving it to
historians and academics to decide what has or has not happened – "as
we did before, in broad agreement with the Social Democrats".

With the Swedish Government being one of Turkey’s strongest backers in
its bid to join the European Union, Reinfeldt made sure to tell
Erdogan that Sweden would continue to back Turkey in this.

"Sweden is a fond supporter of the reform efforts that Prime Minister
Erdogan and his party represent in Turkey", Reinfeldt said. Efforts
that according to Reinfeldt "have lead to a reconciliation process
with Armenia, democracy initiative and opening up of issues regarding
minority rights."

Meanwhile, a Social Democratic newspaper has dug up an interview from
2006 with Reinfeldt where he – ahead of the Swedish elections that
year – supports the idea of defining the killings of Armenians in the
beginning of last century as genocide. That point of view seems to be
abandoned today.

Also on Saturday, at informal meeting of EU’s foreign ministers in
Finland, the foreign ministers of Turkey and Sweden jointly condemned
the vote, Reuters reports.

"It is regrettable because I think the politicisation of history
serves no useful purpose," the Swedish minister Carl Bildt told
reporters.

"We are interested in the business of reconciliation, and decisions
like that tend to raise tensions rather than lower tensions," he said.

tssidor/artikel.asp?ProgramID54&format=1&a rtikel=3507733

http://www.sr.se/cgi-bin/International/nyhe

OSCE MG Co-Chairs To Meet Nalbandian Shortly: Nesterenko

OSCE MG CO-CHAIRS TO MEET NALBANDIAN SHORTLY: NESTERENKO

news.am
March 11 2010
Armenia

OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs will meet with RA Foreign Minister Edward
Nalbandian next week, RF Foreign Ministry official representative
Andrei Nesterenko told at the March 11 briefing.

"After the talks Co-Chairs schedule to visit Yerevan and Baku in
March end — April beginning to attempt to bring together conflicting
parties’ positions on Karabakh issue," Nesterenko stated.

According to him, Russia assesses negotiation course as acceptable.

The discussion of revised version of Madrid Principles proposed by
OSCE MG is underway, Russian Vesti reports.

Armenia Has Monopolized Rights Of Armenian Party During Negotiations

ARMENIA HAS MONOPOLIZED RIGHTS OF ARMENIAN PARTY DURING NEGOTIATIONS: KARABAKH PARLIAMENTARIAN

ArmInfo
2010-03-12 13:15:00

ArmInfo. "There is quite right opinion that Armenia has monopolized
the Armenian party’s rights at negotiations for settlement of the
Karabakh conflict. I’d like to say that Armenia has monopolized also
the responsibility of Nagorny Karabakh. It would be right if Armenia
and Nagorny Karabakh shared that responsibility," Gegham Baghdasaryan,
deputy of the NKR National Assembly, President of the Stepanakert
Press Club, said during presentation of the annual report by the
Civilitas Foundation in the NKR on the topic: "Armenia in 2009:
Promise and Reality."

The parliamentarian believes that the Republic of Armenia and the
Nagorny Karabakh Republic need a strategic agreement of cooperation.

For lack of such agreement, the positions of the Armenian party in
the negotiations have become weaker. The founder of the Civilitas
Foundation is the ex-foreign minister of Armenia. Vardan Oskanyuan
Armenia in 2009: Promise and Reality is the second annual country
report that comes to build on the analysis and projections made in the
Civilitas Foundation’s first annual report issued in December 2008. At
that time, the newly established foundation launched this annual
publication to fill a gap – the need to assess global, regional and
domestic developments from the inside, looking out. In other words,
these annual reports come to complement the various assessments
carried out by international organizations, to serve as the Armenian
perspective on the year’s developments within and around Armenia,
and to take stock of the outlook for the coming year.

OSCE MG Co-Chairs Have Common Approach To Karabakh Problem

OSCE MG CO-CHAIRS HAVE COMMON APPROACH TO KARABAKH PROBLEM

PanARMENIAN.Net
12.03.2010 13:49 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The OSCE Minsk Group co-chairing countries have
a common approach to Karabakh problem, according to OSCE MG French
Co-Chair, Ambassador Bernard Fassier

"The co-chairing countries may have various positions on other issues
but they are unanimous on Karabakh," he said during the 73rd NATO PA
Rose Roth seminar in Yerevan on Friday.

Asked about Russia’s parallel diplomacy aimed at resolution of the
conflict, Ambassador Fassier said that Moscow "makes its contribution
in the framework of proposals developed by the Co-Chairs of the OSCE
Minsk Group.