Orange To Start Providing Services In Armenia From November 5

ORANGE TO START PROVIDING SERVICES IN ARMENIA FROM NOVEMBER 5

Noyan Tapan
Oct 21, 2009

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 21, NOYAN TAPAN. Orange company will start providing
Internet and mobile phone communication services in Armenia from
November 5. According to the company’s information, subscribers can
choose any available number with the prefix 055. The chosen phone
number can be registered at the company’s website
by filling in an application in the Internet.

Those wishing to get a phone number and become Orange subscriber
should visit one of Orange’s shops within 15 days afer November 5.

Orange is the brand used by France Telecom Group for its mobile
network operator and Internet service provider subsidiaries. Sales
of the Group amounted to 53.5 billion euros in 2008 and 25.5 billion
euros in the first half of 2009. As of March 30, 2009 the company had
186 million customers in 30 countries, including 124 million mobile
phone subscribers. On November 19, 2008 Orange was granted a licence
for providing mobile phone communication services in Armenia.

www.orangearmenia.am

Canada Hosted Medieval And Contemporary Armenian Music Concert

CANADA HOSTED MEDIEVAL AND CONTEMPORARY ARMENIAN MUSIC CONCERT

PanARMENIAN.Net
21.10.2009 17:19 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Under the Auspices of His Eminence Archbishop
Hagopian, a medieval and contemporary music concert "An Armenian
Celebration" was held at McGill University’s Pollack Music Hall on
the evening of October 17, 2009.

The concert featured the Russian Arc Orchestra as the guest ensemble
and the McGill Wind Symphony Orchestra under the batons of world
renowned conductors, Airat Ichmouratov and Alain Cazes respectively.

To complete this unique recital, Hampartsoum Djabourian joined as
guest soloist on clarinet and duduk, playing musical compositions by
Aram Khachaturyan and Alexander Spendiaryan.

ANTELIAS: HH Aram I meets the President of Syria Dr Bashar al-Assad

PRESS RELEASE
Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department
Contact: V.Rev.Fr.Krikor Chiftjian, Communications Officer
Tel: (04) 410001, 410003
Fax: (04) 419724
E- mail: [email protected]
Web:

PO Box 70 317
Antelias-Lebanon

HIS HOLINESS ARAM I MEETS THE PRESIDENT OF SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC H.E. DR.
BASHAR AL-ASSAD

On Monday 19 October 2009, before leaving for Beirut, His Holiness Aram I
met with H.E. Dr. Bashar al-Assad. During the meeting, which lasted for
one-and-a-half hours, the President spoke of the positive contribution of
Armenian communities to nation building. President Al-Assad and His Holiness
discussed the peace process and other issues affecting the region. They also
discussed what role religion might play in the goal of building peace with
justice, and they agreed that particular attention should be given to
interreligious dialogue and the dialogue of cultures.

##
View the photos here:
tos/Photos406.htm
*****
The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia is one of the two Catholicosates of
the Armenian Orthodox Church. For detailed information about the dioceses of
the Cilician Catholicosate, you may refer to the web page of the
Catholicosate, The Cilician
Catholicosate, the administrative center of the church is located in
Antelias, Lebanon.

http://www.ArmenianOrthodoxChurch.org/
http://www.ArmenianOrthodoxChurch.org/v04/doc/Pho
http://www.ArmenianOrthodoxChurch.org

Armenia, Lebanon Interested In Developing Interparliamentary Ties

ARMENIA, LEBANON INTERESTED IN DEVELOPING INTERPARLIAMENTARY TIES

armradio.am
21.10.2009 15:26

On October 20 the Armenian Ambassador to Lebanon, Ashor Kocharyan,,
had a meeting with Speaker of the Parliament of Lebanon, Nabih Berri.

During the meeting the interlocutors positively assessed the warm
relations between the two friendly countries and the mutually
beneficial cooperation in different spheres.

The parties discussed the ways of intensification of interparliamentary
ties, emphasizing the importance to reciprocal visits and the active
work of the parliamentary friendship groups.

The Armenian Ambassador wished success to the process of formation
of the Lebanese Government.

Hakob Chakrian: I Want To Believe That Armenian Authorities Will Not

HAKOB CHAKRIAN: I WANT TO BELIEVE THAT ARMENIAN AUTHORITIES WILL NOT MAKE CONCESSIONS FOR SAKE OF RELATIONS WITH TURKEY

Noyan Tapan
Oct 20, 2009

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 20, NOYAN TAPAN. The subject of Armenian-Turkish
relations is discussed too much, which is the consequence of
overestimating the meaning of establishment of Armenian-Turkish
relations and opening of the borders. Turkologist Hakob Chakrian
expressed such an opinion at an October 20 press conference. In his
words, the Armenian opposition forces speculate too much on the issue
of establishment of relations with Turkey. While, in his opinion,
speculating and replying to speculations is easier than discussing and
analysing the issue seriously. According to H. Chakrian, no serious
discussion over this issue has been organized, even the parliamentary
hearings did not prove their value. "It was impossible to discuss
such an issue with nearly 64 reports and 25 speeches. Some spoke for
no particular reason, some just for show," he said.

H. Chakrian hopes and believes that the Armenian authorities for the
sake of relations with Turkey will not make concessions. According to
his estimation, Armenia has nothing to lose. "Finally we will return
to our initial position, we have nothing to lose. Armenia has resisted
Turkey’s pressure for many years, has survived under a blockade for
16 years," H. Chakrian said. In his words, it is Turkey that should
be interested in that issue as it pretends on becoming a regional
superpower. And by estranging Armenia, according to H. Chakrian’s
observation, any Turkish initiative in the South Caucasus is in
advance doomed to failure.

In the opinion of political scientist Yervand Bozoyan, Armenia
was entrapped as a result of its steps aimed at normalizing
Armenian-Turkish relations. According to his observation, Turkey has
repeatedly declared that the Armenian-Turkish border will be opened
if only progress is recorded in the process of Nagorno Karabakh
settlement. In that respect, according to him, the Armenian-Turkish
protocols give an occasion for anxiety. In political scientist’s
opinion, though the Nagorno Karabakh problem can not be included in the
document, indeed these two issues are interrelated. According to him,
it is also confirmed by the circumstance that the "Nagorno Karabakh
problem from a frozen conflict is turned into a conflict subject to
active discussion."

EU Reforms & Turkey

EU REFORMS & TURKEY
By Muhammad Ali Siddiqi

Dawn.com
Oct 20 2009
Pakistan

Only the Czech Republic now stands between the European Union and a
president for the 27-nation grouping. Ratified by Ireland, the Lisbon
Treaty provides for a foreign minister and a long-term president as
against the rotating six-month job at present.

Even Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer is willing to go along, the sole
opposition to the treaty coming from President Vaclav Klaus. Sooner or
later, Prague will ratify the treaty, paving the way for a president
of the European Council and a foreign minister. The Lisbon Treaty also
has a social charter, about which even Britain and Poland have some
reservations. For Turkey, all this should provide food for thought.

Having a foreign minister or president at Brussels doesn’t mean that
all European states are ready to agree on common foreign and defence
policies. With Ireland in the west and Cyprus almost off the coast
of Syria, it is impossible for the EU’s 27 states to have a common
orientation in foreign and military affairs — basic principles of
geopolitics scoff at such an idea.

The split between Britain (and America) on one side and France and
Germany on the other over the Iraq war in 2003 clearly shows that no
European state is ready to subordinate its national interests to the
perceived common good of Europe. Nevertheless, in spite of formidable
obstacles, the EU states have reason to think in terms of a higher
degree of alignment in matters of foreign policy because of the rude
shocks they received during the Bosnian and Kosovo crises.

Both were European conflicts, but because of Europe’s military
weakness, it was America which called the shots and prevailed.

Besides, to the consternation of Paris and Berlin, Britain’s presence
in the EU has meant a ceaseless projection of American policy on
European affairs. This has served to give to the EU’s foreign policy
deliberations an overdose of Anglo-Saxon advice. Nevertheless, the
trend towards greater coordination in defence and foreign policy is
unmistakable, and Turkey cannot ignore it.

Should it ever become a full EU member, Turkey will obviously have
its own foreign policy compulsions which may not necessarily tie up
with those of Brussels. On the Arab-Israeli conflict, notwithstanding
differences in shades, all EU governments share Israel’s concept of
its security and are extremely reticent about Israeli war crimes and
crimes against humanity in the occupied territories.

That the Turks feel strongly about the plight of the Palestinian
people became visible, literally, last January at Davos when Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan stormed out of the conference hall after
an angry exchange with Israeli President Shimon Peres. Earlier this
month, Ankara snubbed Tel Aviv by excluding it from an air exercise,
prompting America and Italy to pull out.

For reasons of geography and history, Turkey enjoys a unique position.

While it cannot reverse its European orientation begun by Kemal
Ataturk 85 years ago, it cannot at the same time repudiate its past
and be indifferent to its cultural affinities with Middle Eastern
countries. Turkey has been an associate-member of the European economic
grouping since 1963 when today’s EU was the European Common Market.

Minus four years, half a century has passed, and Turkey is still
knocking on Europe’s door for entry. In the meantime, Brussels has
opened the floodgates of membership, accepting former Soviet bloc
adversaries, states formerly part of Yugoslavia and those on Europe’s
periphery, like Greek Cyprus and Malta.

Entry talks with Turkey began in 2005, but still there is no sign
that Brussels will ever be satisfied that Ankara has undertaken all
the legal and administrative reforms necessary to conform to the
Copenhagen criteria. In fact, as cynics say, Ankara has rewritten
one-third of its constitution to try to satisfy Europe but has failed.

This humiliation has angered a proud people like the Turks, and
popular support for membership has gone down from 70 to 42 per cent.

The strongest opposition to Turkey’s membership comes from Germany and
France, both of which have large immigrant populations, mostly Muslim.

Germany has three million people of Turkish descent, and France
has five million migrants, mostly from North Africa and Francophone
countries.

>From the German and French points of view, a Turkish membership
will mean a new and continuous wave of Turkish migrants to Europe’s
prosperous countries, especially Germany. This could significantly
alter Germany’s demographic character. No wonder, Chancellor Angela
Merkel calls for a ‘privileged partnership’ for Turkey, and President
Nicolas Sarkozy supports her.

At the same time, Europeans realise that keeping Turkey — the Muslim
world’s most liberal and western-oriented country — out will not be
in the interest of the European Union which will come to be regarded as
a Christian club. Besides, Turkey has of late acquired new importance.

Even though there is a relative fall in Turkey’s importance as a key
Nato nation because of the end of the Cold War, the country is now
playing a greater regional role. Its economy has improved and the
energy deals it has signed with Iran, Iraq and Qatar, especially that
relating to the Nabucco pipeline, will help Europe in its quest for
diversifying its energy sources.

Turkey has also signed a gas agreement with Azerbaijan’s autonomous
republic Nakhchivan, and the energy deal with Moscow has enabled the
Putin government to bypass Ukraine. Meanwhile, Ankara has improved
its relations with its hard-line Arab neighbour to the south, Syria,
is normalising relations with Armenia, is supporting Cyprus unity
talks and is forging closer economic ties with Iran. Many Europeans
feel all this goes to Europe’s advantage.

Still a full EU membership is likely to elude Ankara. What it should
go for is the privileged partnership, though unfortunately neither
Merkel nor Sarkozy has bothered to explain what it actually means.

Common sense suggests that it should be an improvement on the existing
associate membership. The best bet for the Erdogan government should
be to get political and economic space for Turkey in the Merkel idea
and seek maximum economic benefits.

In such a privileged relationship, Ankara would not necessarily be
called upon to abandon its known position on Cyprus or get endless
rebukes from Brussels for failure to comply with the Copenhagen
criterion. More important, such a relationship will remove the irritant
that at present characterises Ankara’s relationship with Brussels.

PS: David Cameron and his Conservative colleagues can take heart from
the fact that Tony Blair, the man who inflicted three consecutive
defeats on the Tories, is now unlikely to be the first EU president.

Gul: Unacceptable To Occupy Lands

GUL: UNACCEPTABLE TO OCCUPY LANDS

15603.html
18:00:04 – 19/10/2009

In its efforts to normalize relations with Armenia, Turkey does not
have in mind its European Union accession bid but peace in the region,
said President Abdullah Gul in an interview with a French magazine.

Peace in the region will bring development and prosperity in return,
he believes In an interview with French magazine L’Express, President
Abdullah Gul said that if there was security in the Caucasus, there
could be stability, development and prosperity in the region.

Turkey and Armenia signed two protocols in Zurich on Oct. 10, aimed
to normalize relations between the two countries. U.S., Russian,
and European officials were also present at the signing. Gul said
there was no foreign pressure on Turkey to sign the protocols. "Our
policy is to bring stability and security to the region, maintain
good relations with our neighbors, and solve problems that were left
on the shelf. Having said that, we are grateful to those who helped
us establish this process."

Instead of international pressure, Gul said the driving force behind
the singing of the protocol was to bring stability and development
to the region.

"If security is introduced to the Caucasus, there will also be
stability and, hence, development and prosperity. The Cold War is
over. Everyone wants to satisfy his own people and take the path of
cooperation," said Gul. "Dormant wars can heat up any time. We have
seen this happen between Russia and Georgia. Issues in the Caucasus
should be resolved."

Gul said the border between Turkey and Armenia would open once the
protocols are approved by each country’s parliament and signed by the
foreign ministers. He said the process foresees normalization in all
fields and the project for peace, cooperation, and stabilization in
the Caucasus also includes Armenia.

Asked whether Turkey has made concessions in the protocols, Gul said
he did not want to think of it in these terms, as it would not bring
peace. "It is necessary to have long-term and broad vision."

He said he does not believe that the protocols freezing the
Nagorno-Karabakh issue are a concession on the part of Turkey. "The
fact that a country is occupying the territory of another country
is unacceptable. Therefore, that issue should be resolved through
dialogue," said Gul. He asked: "Why would Armenia and Azerbaijan not
be able to improve their relationship?"

Reminded that there have been reactions from the Armenian diaspora
against the protocols for "failing to mention" the events of 1915 and
asked whether he thought this would weaken the effect of the protocols,
Gul said: "It is not for me to rule on disputes among Armenians."

He said: "But I want to issue a call for cooperation. The Armenians
living in France are far from Armenia. If they want to lend their
support to the Armenians of Armenia, they must support the process."

Gul said dwelling constantly on the recollection of past hostilities
would not allow for peace and cooperation. "If we lived constantly on
the recollection of past hostilities, never would France and Germany
have reconciled. And Europe would not have advanced toward unity as
it has today."

Gul said there were different interpretations of the 1915 events. "But
we show our confidence in ourselves by opening our archives, including
military archives. Let a committee of historians, even experts of the
subject from third countries, work on this issue. We will recognize
its conclusions," said Gul.

He said Turkey did not have its European Union accession bid in mind
in its relations with Armenia. "While conducting our policy vis-a-vis
Armenia, we absolutely do not have the European Union in mind,"
said Gul. the Hurriat informs.

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/politics-lrahos

Regional ‘Gavar’ Branch Of Unibank Opened

REGIONAL ‘GAVAR’ BRANCH OF UNIBANK OPENED

ArmInfo
2009-10-20 17:22:00

ArmInfo. The regional "Gavar" branch of Unibank has been opened. As
press-service of Unibank reported, the branch having been functioning
since 19 October is the 32-nd in the net of the bank. To note, the
regional "Gavar" branch and "David Anhakht" branch of Yerevan were
registered at Armenian Central Bank on 12 October.

As director on operational line of Unibank Eliza Mheryan said,
the new branch will offer all the specter of the banking services,
including utility bills via the UNIPAY system.

Unibank is also going to open offices in all the branches of "Yerevan
City" supermarket. In 2010 a new branch of Unibank will be opened in
Agarak (Megri).

To recall, as of 1 July 2009 Unibank had 30 offices, 12 of which in
Yerevan, 16 – in the regions of Armenia and 2 in the NKR.

Armenians In The Ottoman Economy

ARMENIANS IN THE OTTOMAN ECONOMY
Anahit Astoyan

e-ottoman-economy/
2009/10/19 | 18:07

Making Their Mark in Commerce and Manufacturing

Prior to WW I, Armenians played a pivotal role in various sectors
of the Ottoman economy including foreign and domestic commerce,
manufacturing, the banking sector, etc. The Turkish bourgeoisie, in
comparison, found itself in a secondary role and oftentimes dependent
role. The Young Turks feared that the further strengthening of the
Armenian community, both economically and materially, would serve as
the basis for their future political victories. Gradually, the Turkish
ruling elite came to the belief that sooner or later Armenians would
be in a position to take over the reins of political power, just as
they had done in the economic sphere.

The organizers of the Armenian Genocide, besides pursuing political
ambitions, also wanted to free themselves from competing with
Armenians. By cleansing the Ottoman Empire of Armenians, the Young
Turks also removed their most powerful economic competition, their
property and, through the expropriation of Armenian wealth, they
were able to cover a large part of their war expenses as well. The
Young Turks, in a word, due to the wealth stolen from Armenians,
were able to pay off much of the foreign debt threatening the newly
independent Turkish republic. A Turkish bourgeoisie would soon rise
on the centuries-old property and wealth accumulated by Armenians.

Let’s now take a brief look at the Ottoman economic sectors where
Armenians played a significant role:

The selection process for Ottoman government officials took into
account a candidate’s national and religious identity rather than
competence and personal values. The vast majority of the bureaucracy,
the police, military and court system were comprised of Muslims,
largely Ottoman Turks. Taking mastery over the ruling governmental
functions, they left the economy mostly to non-Turkish elements.

Ottoman Turks hadn’t yet bvreacged that level of sophistication where
they could manage and develop the empire’s economy and thus they were
obliged to rely upon the experience of their non-Turkish subjects.

Armenians, as the representatives of one of the oldest civilizations
in the Near East, along with other subject people, strove for five
years to keep the Ottoman economy flourishing. Deprived of the right
to participate in administrative and military activities, commerce
and crafts were the fields that became more or less the sectors where
Armenians could manifest their skills and inherent competence.

The Ottoman sultans would quickly populate the cities they conquered
with Armenians. In 1453, after seizing Constantinople, Sultan Muhammed
ordered Armenian craftsmen and traders to the ravished capital to
rebuild and turn it into a showpiece of the empire.

Armenian merchants reach out to Iran, India and beyond

Starting in the 15th century, the shops of Armenian traders began
to flourish in Constantinople. Commerce between the Mediterranean
and Black Seas to Iran and India beyond was largely in the hands
of Armenian merchants. From the other prime Ottoman trading port of
Smyrna, Armenians were in contact with the nations of Europe. From
here, Armenian caravans made their way to Persia and other Asian
countries. The custom taxes paid by Armenian merchants were one of
the large sources of revenue for the Ottoman government coffers. From
the 16th to 19th centuries, Armenian merchants played a major role in
the development of Ottoman commerce and facilitated the transportation
of Ottoman goods to Europe and Asia.

>From the 16th century onwards, the Armenian amira and "chelepi" class
("chelebi" meaning ‘godly’ in Turkish). Like the "amiras", they were
wealthy merchants with close ties to government circles and high
civil servants whose affairs they managed. These titles of honor were
given to enterprising entrepreneurs from the regions that relocated
to the capital, obtaining authority and influence. These Armenian
amiras and chelebis soon worked their way into the inner sanctum of
the empire’s ruling elite, a closed world to Christians. In the 18th
century, these prominent individuals began to manage many important
government departments and posts.

Amiras and Chelebis: Wealthy merchants with government ties

The Tiuzian family held a unique place in art and jewelery making
and over the generations became the royal goldsmiths. The management
of the mint and gold and silver reserves was confided to them. The
Demirjibashian family ran the empire’s shipbuilding and cannon-making
facilities. For generations, the Dadian family oversaw the outfitting
of the military and arms and paper manufacture. Silk production and
custom fee collection was the purview of Mgrditch Amira Jezayirlian.

After the Crimean War in the mid 19th century, when the Ottoman
Empire opened its doors to the West, Armenians were ready to play
a major role between the empire and Europe. Armenian merchants were
fluent in the languages and customs of the Europeans. Many Armenian
merchants, not satisfied with the selection of goods offered by the
Europeans, established direct links with European manufacturers and
commercial associations. Many Armenian merchants actually set up
shop in various European cities and branched out beyond the narrow
confines of Ottoman trade.

By the 1850’s, large numbers of Armenian merchants were making their
way to Constantinople Smyrna and other coastal towns from the interior
regions. This further strengthened the position of Armenians in the
Ottoman economy. Armenian commercial houses in the capital and Smyrna
became institutions unto themselves. With the introduction of European
capital and manufacturing, the economic condition of Armenians quickly
improved. In 1908, "Hay Bankan", a branch of the Ottoman Bank to be
managed by Armenians was established and greatly facilitated Armenian
commercial transactions.

However, this Armenian economic development took place under the
arbitrary conditions rampant in the Ottoman Empire. For instance,
Turkish merchants with similar revenues were charged three times less
in taxes than their Armenian counterparts. Plunder and deliberate
arson had taken their toll on the markets in Van, Adana, Kharpert
and elsewhere. In 1908, the Ottoman authorities seized Armenian
manufacturing centers in the town of Kharpert.

Despite these trials and tribulations, Armenians continued to play
a leading role in Ottoman trade and commerce.

The following statistics, culled from the Armenian State Archives by
historian John Giragosian, give a picture of the economic state of
Armenians prior to WW I.

In the villayet of Sivas (Sebastia), 141 out of 166 commercial
importers and 127 out of 150 importers were Armenian. Out of the
9,800 small traders and craftsmen, 6,800 were Armenian.

Alexander Myasnikyan, in a lecture he presented in Moscow in 1913,
noted that despite the fact that Armenians comprise 35% of the
population in the villayet of Sivas, they make-up 85% of the traders,
70% of the craftsmen and 80% of the manufacturing houses.

The drive and initiative of Armenians wasn’t only confined to trade
and commerce. They proved their mettle in all economic sectors. There
were also Armenian merchants who transported European machinery and
parts back to the empire and started to produce goods with European
quality and appearance.

Armenian manufacturing prior to the Genocide

Gradually, the nature of capital in the Ottoman Empire began to
change from commercial to manufacturing capital. In Arabkir, at the
beginning of the 20th century, where Armenians were mostly engaged in
linen production, there were already scores of manufacturers focused
on specific linen products; sheets, tablecloths, intricate weaves, etc.

The woolen items and copper pieces produced in the towns of Garin,
Van and Baghesh were sold locally as well as overseas. Of the 150
manufacturing units in operation in the villayet of Sivas at the time,
130 belonged to Armenians; the rest in Turkish or foreign hands. Out
of the 17,000 production workers, some 14,000 were Armenians.

One must remember that the Turks remained loathe to enter commerce
and the crafts, believing those professions to be beneath them.

Overwhelmingly, they aspired to the loftier heights of government
and military appointments, leaving Ottoman subject peoples the task
of creating conditions for the economic prosperity of the empire.

In his memoirs, Sultan Abdul Hamid II (the Red Sultan) wrote, "The
source of all our evils is that the Ottoman doesn’t strive to create
any actual value. He is accustomed to become a ‘baron’ and to leave
the real work to others. He lives to enjoy life. Our youth believe
that they cannot become anything other than an officer or official."

To be continued

http://hetq.am/en/society/armenians-in-th