NKR: The Bitter Word – Refugee

THE BITTER WORD – REFUGEE
Evika Babayan

Azat Artsakh Daily
09 Feb 09
Republic of Nagorno Karabakh [NKR]

Everything started in February 1988 when peaceful demands of the
Armenian population of NKAO for self-determination were opposed
with brute force and unwillingness even to discuss the problem by
Azerbaijan. In addition, on 26-29 February 1988, in Sumgait, a bloody
butchery and exile of the multi-thousand local Armenian population,
who not only lived in this town but also had taken part in its
construction, was organized. With these criminal actions Azerbaijan
entered a new stage of realization of its policy, which qualified by
the international society as a policy of ethnic cleansing. Really
barbaric actions began against more than 500-thousand Armenian
population around the territory of Azerbaijan. On January 13 1990,
mass killings of Armenians started in the capital of Azerbaijan
followed by banishing them from Baku. Remembering Baku of those days,
I see the stage of the sea port guarded by a small group of young
Russin soldiers, a crowd of people shrinking from fierce wind and the
column of thousands of refugees climbing up the gang-board of a sea
ferry sailing to Krasnovodsk, getting aboard in a complete silence
and without any luggage. A suitcase in a hand of a person hurrying
toward the sea port or the airport could cost him his life. For
most of them it was a trip to nowhere. B y conducting combined
operations of Azeri OMON and USSR armed forces units the authorities
managed to isolate NKAO from the rest of the world and banish the
indigenous Armenian population from their homeland in many regions
of Azerbaijan, including Kirovabad, Khanlar, Getashen, Shahumyan and
other regions. This is how a new layer of population, named refugees,
was created, in our case the Armenian refugees from Azerbaijan. On
the occasion of anniversary of the tragic events in Baku, we met the
President of the NKR Refugee NGO Sarasar Saryan. "Mr. Saryan, what
is the number of refugees in the republic and who is eligible to be
granted the status of a refugee?" "Anybody who flees his country and
seeks sanctuary in a foreign country considered a refugee. The status
of refugees is defined in the UN Convention Relating to the Status of
Refugees, adopted in 1951. The convention stipulates that a refugee can
be a person who leaves his country because of a war or experiencing
"well-founded fear" of being persecuted for reasons of his race,
religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or
for his political opinion. Now the Convention Relating to the Status
of Refugees is ratified by the overwhelming majority of countries,
including Armenia and Azerbaijan. As for the number of refugees,
there are up to 25 thousand of refugees and almost the same amount of
internally displaced persons around the coun try." "Tell us briefly
how your organization was founded."

"The Refugee Non-Governmental Organization was founded in 1988-89, i.e.

in the very beginning of Karabakh movement, when the first refugees
appeared from Sumgait, then from Baku, Kirovabad and so on. At the
time, we assumed the mission of allocation of the refugees, supplying
them with living essentials etc. The organization itself was created
spontaneously, based on the requirements of the time. What helped
us a lot was that the most of the refugees, who fled to Karabakh,
had Karabakh roots, so they had relatives here. Officially we were
registered as the NKR Refugee NGO in August 2004." "If I am not
mistaking, in the same year, the NKR Refugee Law was adopted. Tell us,
what the adoption of the low gave to the refugees." "The law protects
the rights of refugees fled from Azerbaijan. The adoption of the low
allowed the government to issue to the refugees some compensation
for the transportation of their property, moral and psychological
losses etc. To be honest, the amount was not significant, but at
least it was something. Unfortunately, the aid did not apply to the
internally displaced persons." "What category of people could be
considered as internally displaced persons?" "It’s the refugees from
Martakert, from the south of the Hadrout region, people from Shoushi,
who came back to their destroyed houses, but did not receive the
compensation. Taking the opportunity, I’d like to speak about their
rights too. I think it is necessary to extend their social privileges
to some level. Especially some of them had been wounded during the
war and became disabled. It’s also The Great Patriotic War veterans
and pensioners to whom especially the medical privileges are of high
importance." "What is the main problem for refugees today?"

"The main problem for the refugees from Azerbaijan is the absence of
an international status. Actually, the refugees of Karabakh deprived
of the status that others have, particularly those of Azerbaijan
which gives them high advantages. For about 20 years the Azerbaijani
authorities have been presenting to the international society a "show
of tent camps" to make them believe in the terrible plight of the
refugees and displaced people. In fact there was no need to build those
camps. During 1988-1992 360 thousand Armenians had been deported from
Azerbaijan to Armenia. 92 thousand apartments and houses left by the
Armenian families were more than enough to solve the housing problem of
the Azeri families. But as the houses of Armenians of Azerbaijan, who
mostly lived in urban areas, had a definite market value, they became
a source of personal enrichment for Azeri officials. In other words,
the housi ng problem arose because of the avidity of the Azerbaijani
authorities and the people became a victim of gutter politics of the
official Baku and an instrument for achieving its goals. Another vital
problem for us is the housing problem. Almost all the population
of Karabakh have social problems, however the refugees are in a
worse position." "And the last question: What plans do you have for
the future?" "The Refugee Organization intends to continue seeking
compensation from Azerbaijan for the refugees settled in Karabakh
for their moral and material losses. In 1988 Armenian authorities
unilaterally paid 110 million US dollars to 14.5 thousand Azeri
families to compensate the houses and property they had left.

Nevertheless, unlike Armenia, Azerbaijan is not willing to take any
steps to compensate moral and material damage of its ex-residents."

Crisis Impacted Military Expenses Of Cis Countries

CRISIS IMPACTED MILITARY EXPENSES OF CIS COUNTRIES

WPS Agency
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
February 9, 2009 Monday
Russia

Military development in some countries will be corrected

Analysis of public data about the amounts that former Soviet republics
are ready to spend on defense in 2009 shows that despite the economic
crisis, many CIS member states keep spending a lot of money on their
armies even though the relative parameters (in percents of the GDP)
of military expenses of majority of CIS countries remain in 2009 on
a level of previous years or slightly low. In any case, Table No. 1
shows that even in conditions of the crisis, the aggregate defense
expenses in 2009 grew by 9% in comparison to 2008. In any case, this
parameter is much smaller than that in the CIS in 2008. In 2008,
defense expenses grew by 21.4% in comparison to 2007 and by 65% in
comparison to 2006. During all these years the aggregate GDP of the
former Soviet republics grew only by 15%. In comparison to 2008, the
average growth of GDP of all CIS countries (Georgia and Turkmenistan
are traditionally included into this group) is planned in 2009 on a
level of 12.4%.

Along with this, as in past years we see record holders in military
expenses. Georgia remains the absolute leader according to military
expenses despite the war in South Ossetia. The table presents expenses
of this country ($600 million) planned in the law on the budget for
2008. In reality these expenses were corrected throughout 2008 and
totaled almost $1 billion. Georgia was defeated in South Ossetia but
its military appetite did not grow smaller. In 2009 it plans to spend
4.4% of the GDP on military expenses. This is the record parameter
of the planned military expenses not only in the CIS but also in the
whole world. Proceeding from this figure it is possible to presume
that the regime of Saakashvili has not given up its revenge plans
and a new aggression of Georgian forces against South Ossetia and
Abkhazia is possible.

Table No. 1

Military expenses of the CIS countries in 2009 (in millions of US
dollars)*

* – the table was composed on the basis of analysis of public data
on economies of the CIS countries and their budgets for 2009; similar
data for 2008 were given in brackets.

** – data of the expenses part of the budget of Turkmenistan in 2009

After Georgia a significant percentage of GDP will be spent on
Defense in 2009 by Armenia (3.6% of the GDP) and Uzbekistan (3.4%)
like before. There is an explanation of this. There is a conflict
about Nagorno-Karabakh between Armenia and Azerbaijan and Yerevan is
preparing for possible hostilities. Uzbekistan has an adverse social
situation connected with overpopulation, unemployment and influence
of radical extremist and religious movements. The development of
these trends should be prevented by the so-called military factor.

Countries with a relatively developed raw materials economy – Russia,
Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan – reduced their defense expenses in relative
terms: Russia reduced them from 2.7% to 2.67% of the GDP, Kazakhstan
reduced them from 1.1% to 1% of the GDP and Azerbaijan reduced them
from 3.6% to 2.76% of the GDP. Along with this, in absolute terms
their budgets grew at least by 10-15% in 2009 in comparison to 2008
due to the economic growth. Of all CIS countries, only Ukraine reduced
its expenses on national defense both in relative terms (decrease of
the military budget from 1.1% of the GDP in 2008 to 0.85% of the GDP
in 2009) and in absolute terms (from $1.2 billion to $1.08 billion
respectively) due to the significant impact of economic crisis and
devaluation of national currency (hrivna got devaluated by more than
73% in comparison to US dollar in half a year). Kyrgyzstan and Moldova
will spend less than 1% of the GDP on defense again.

Boxing: Vic’s dominance written in blood

The Australian, Australia
Feb 9 2009

Vic’s dominance written in blood

JORGE Arce had said Vic Darchinyan could only cause trouble with one
hand.

He was right.

Darchinyan’s left hand popped its way through Arce’s defences, his
resolve, his experience, and through most of the skin above and around
both eyes.

Between the 11th and 12th rounds, ring doctor Paul Wells struck a blow
himself, for decency. He didn’t allow Arce to take another shot in an
IBF super flyweight championship fight yesterday.

It was Darchinyan’s 34th fight, his 26th knockout and his 32nd
victory, with one draw thrown in. It might not have been the violent
end that he had promised, but it was systematic and a little
instructive, too.

The Armenian-born Australian Darchinyan dominated from the start,
taking the fight to two-time champion Arce in every round with
seemingly no concern for the Mexican challenger’s dangerous
counter-punches.

"I told you, I’m going to punish him, and I’m going to finish him,"
Darchinyan said.

"I wanted a clean knockout, not a technical knockout, but, still, I’m
happy with my fight."

He defended his WBA, WBC and IBF belts, after becoming the first
fighter to hold all three titles in the 115-pound class.

The build-up to the bout was marked by sledging on both sides, but
Darchinyan was respectful in victory.

"He surprised me," he admitted. "I didn’t expect him to fight like he
did. He proved he was tough and a good fighter. I hit him with some
good shots and he kept coming."

Darchinyan was the first man to stop Arce since Michael Carbajal 10
years ago.

Darchinyan’s attack is self-explanatory. But his defence wins fights,
too. He stood almost to the side against Arce, moving his shoulders
constantly, giving "El Travieso" very little to hit.

Throughout, Darchinyan’s corner kept yelling, "Double jab! Keep your
distance! Double jab!" Darchinyan pretended to listen, and did indeed
paw at Arce’s face with an occasional right lead, but mostly he
snake-charmed Arce with punching angles that you don’t see every
night.

"He’s a lot like that lazy susan you see at the Chinese restaurant,"
said Gary Shaw, Darchinyan’s promoter. "You reach for the prime
rib. All of a sudden, it moves to the other side. He takes an
opponent’s game plan completely away."

But let’s be clear. This guy can hit.

In the fourth round, he rocked Arce hard with a left, and Arce’s
survival instincts took him to the far ropes before the bell rang. A
couple of other rounds ended with Darchinyan wobbling Arce.

Finally, in the 11th, there was too much blood and too little time to
keep it going. All three judges gave Darchinyan 10 of 11 rounds, which
was about right.

The cut men in both corners were busy after two rounds, with Arce
carving up Darchinyan’s eyebrow with a left hook. Arce needed to do
more of that, to test Darchinyan’s chin with counterpunches. He
couldn’t, primarily because Darchinyan was so good in defence.

Arce was agitated at the end and unhappy about the doctor’s call.

"Going into the last round, a fighter always has a chance to win," he
said.

"I recognise he is a strong fighter, but that cut was from his
elbow. He’s a dirty fighter who throws a lot of elbows."

What’s next for the Sydney-based Darchinyan?

"We could go for a fourth belt in this weight class, or we could go
with (Fernando) Montiel at 118," Shaw said.

"Or we could go with Israel Vazquez at 122."

That’s the same Vazquez who emerged from the brutal, beautiful trilogy
with Rafael Marquez and became the fight fan’s fighter.

Vazquez posed for pictures with Darchinyan afterward. Their fight
would promise tons of talk. Just don’t underestimate a crafty
left-hander.

Orange County Register, AFP

Armenian police has no need to purchase new water cannons

Armenian police has no need to purchase new water cannons

2

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 6, NOYAN TAPAN. The rumors about the negotiations
with a Turkish company for replenishing the arsenal of Armenian police
with new water cannons do not correspond to reality, NT was informed by
the PR and Information Department of the RA Police.

According to the department head, Police Colonel Sayat Shirinian, "the
Armenian police has no need to purchase new water cannons and the
information was spread in the context of provocative policy of the
regional neighbor".

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=101195

Presentation of interview collection with Society reps in Yerevan

Presentation of collection of interviews with representatives of
Armenian and Azerbaijani societies takes place in Yerevan

6

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 6, NOYAN TAPAN. The presentation of the collection
entitled "Armenia-Azerbaijan, 2005-2008, Opinions about the Main
Things" took place in Yerevan on February 5. The collection contains
interviews with representatives of societies of the two countries, with
the representatives of the same speciality or the same stratum being
asked the same questions. The collection was prepared by Region
research center in Armenia and Peace and Democracy Institute in
Azerbaijan within the framework of Stereotype Overcoming and General
Information Environment program of Conciliation Resources international
organization.

The director of Region center Laura Baghdasarian said that over 4 years
more than 150 interviews were conducted and then published "in pairs"
in Azg and 168 Hours papers (Armenia) and Novoye Vremya
Russian-language paper (Azerbaijan). Only 42 interviews in Armenian and
Russian were included in the presented collection. L. Baghdasarian
announced that the publication of the collection (probably, only in
Russian) is also expected in Baku. The selection of interviews to be
included in the two books was made independely of each other, and their
content is not completely the same.

According to L. Baghdasarian, considerable material expressing opinions
of representatives of two countries was collected. These opinions are
not only about the Karabakh problem and the prospects of conciliation,
but also about domestic and foreign policies, social and cultural life.
All materials were posted on the wesite of Caucasus Journalists Net
().

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=101194
www.caucasusjournalists.net

Belarus will recognize independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia

AZG Armenian Daily #020, 07/02/2009

International

PAVEL BORODIN: BELARUS WILL RECOGNIZE THE INDEPENDENCE OF SOUTH
OSSETIA AND ABKHAZIA

By Aghavni Haroutiunian, translated by L.H.

Belarus National Assembly House of Representatives will discuss the
issue of recognition of the South Ossetia and Abkhazia on April 2. The
issue is already on the agenda of the Belarusian National Assembly.

"Azg" daily has already informed that Georgian Ministry of Foreign
Affairs expressed its concern and dissatisfaction with it and hoped
that the Parliament of Belarus would not follow Russian
Presidentâ??s example.

Nevertheless, according to Ria-Novosti, State Secretary of the
Belarus-Russia Union State Pavel Borodin announced that Minsk would
recognize the independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

And why Belarus hasnâ??t yet recognized the independence of
South Ossetia and Abkhazia, Borodin explained that corresponding
processes are proceeding till today that will end with recognition on
April 2.

Supposedly, Belarus is not concerned that the official Tbilisi will
assess similar process in Belarus parliament as a "not friendly" step.

Armenian, Turkish Youth Soccer Teams To Play First Match In Yerevan

ARMENIAN, TURKISH YOUTH SOCCER TEAMS TO PLAY FIRST MATCH IN YEREVAN

PanARMENIAN.Net
06.02.2009 14:48 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Armenian Football Federation has published the
schedule of European Championship qualifiers of the Armenian youth
soccer team.

Young Armenians will play their first match with the Swiss team on
June 5. Then, they will host Turk peers on June 9. The return match
is due on September 13, 2009.

Ten group winners and four teams with the best results on the second
position will have a place in play-offs offering a ticket to the
finals.

Here is the schedule of the games:

05.06.09 – Switzerland-Armenia 09.06.09 – Armenia-Turkey 04.09.09
– Armenia-Switzerland 13.10.09 – Turkey-Armenia 14.11.09 –
Armenia-Estonia 17.11.09 – Armenia-Ireland 02.03.10 – Ireland-Armenia
20.05.10 – Estonia-Armenia 07.09.10 – Georgia-Armenia 11.10.10 –
Armenia-Georgia

BAKU: Differences On Garabagh Settlement Persist

DIFFERENCES ON GARABAGH SETTLEMENT PERSIST

AzerNews Weekly
Feb 4 2009
Azerbaijan

International mediators brokering a settlement to the Upper (Nagorno)
Garabagh conflict expressed hope after last week`s meeting of
Azerbaijani and Armenian Presidents Ilham Aliyev and Serzh Sarkisian
in Zurich, Switzerland. At the meeting it was decided that the two
countries would strike a common ground on resolving the long-standing
dispute.

"The co-chairs hope the parties will be able to bridge these remaining
differences in the near future to secure a peace agreement that is
far better for all parties than the status quo. Their goal is a just
and balanced agreement based upon the Helsinki Final Act principles
of territorial integrity, self-determination, and non-use of force,"
the co-chairmen of the OSCE Minsk Group said in a statement.

The co-chairs – Bernard Fassier of France, Yuri Merzlyakov of Russia
and Matthew Bryza of the United States – traveled to Baku on January
19, where they met with President Aliyev and Foreign Minister Elmar
Mammadyarov, and to Yerevan on January 20, where they met with
President Sarkisian and Foreign Minister Eduard Nalbandian.

The mediators again met as a group with the foreign ministers in
Zurich on January 27 and organized a joint meeting with Presidents
Aliyev and Sarkisian in Zurich on January 28, on the sidelines of
the World Economic Forum.

The co-chairs explored with the two presidents their thoughts on
how to finalize the basic principles on the peaceful settlement of
the Garabagh conflict, proceeding from the proposal presented to the
sides at the OSCE Ministerial Conference in Madrid in November 2007.

The co-chairs agreed to work with the foreign ministers on elaborating
proposals "for the consideration of the two presidents on the most
important remaining differences between the sides existing within
the framework of the basic principles."

US mediator Matthew Bryza said the presidents` meeting proceeded
positively and constructively, and progress was achieved in narrowing
the differences between the conflicting sides on the basic principles
of the peace process. He noted that the co-chairs would visit the
region in February "to further move forward the positive environment
achieved."

Overall, the co-chairs described both the presidential and ministerial
talks as a step toward settling the Garabagh conflict.

The two ministers also expressed their satisfaction with the outcome
of presidential talks.

The Azerbaijani Foreign Minister said the parties discussed both the
principles of the peace process that are currently being planned and
the existing peace.

"There are some issues pertaining to the basic principles that remain
to be agreed upon. Each president stated his views on these issues
in terms of mutual understanding. Naturally, this is a complicated
process, but it is necessary to take steps moving forward. There is
no other way," Mammadyarov said.

Armenian Foreign Minister Nalbandian said the talks had been held in
line with the basic documents outlining the peace process.

"Both presidents stressed a certain dynamics in the Garabagh conflict
settlement from the viewpoint of holding talks on a regular basis. With
each meeting, the sides are understanding each other better and trying
to resolve outstanding challenges and hurdles.

"I would also like to note that we are now talking about drafting the
principles of the conflict settlement. After the basic principles
are agreed upon, the parties will tackle work on basic documents,"
Nalbandian added.

The Zurich talks were the third meeting between the Azerbaijani
and Armenian leaders. The two earlier met in St. Petersburg and
Moscow. Their previous meeting in the Russian capital, which took place
at the request of Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on November 2,
2008, concluded with the signing of a declaration, the first document
inked by the two heads of state in the past 16 years.

Armenia and Azerbaijan waged a war over the mountainous region of
Upper Garabagh in the early 1990s, which claimed some 30,000 lives and
displaced about one million Azerbaijanis. Armenia has been occupying
over 20% of Azerbaijan`s internationally-recognized territory since
then. The ceasefire accord was signed in 1994, but peace talks have
accomplished little so far. Sporadic clashes on the frontline continue.

Investigation Launched Into Murder Of Armenia’s Deputy Police Chief

INVESTIGATION LAUNCHED INTO MURDER OF ARMENIA’S DEPUTY POLICE CHIEF

ARKA
Feb 4, 2009

YEREVAN, February 4. /ARKA/. A probe has been launched into the murder
of Deputy Chief of the RA Police Gevorg Mheryan.

On February 3, 20:30pm, Arabkir Department of the RA Police received
a call, saying RA Deputy Police Chief Col. Gevorg Mheryan was shot
dead as he was about to enter his apartment on the seventh floor of
a multistory building in 65 Barbyus St., the Press Service of the RA
Police reports.

Prosecutor General Aghvan Hovsepyan, RA Police Chief Alik Sargsyan,
Director of the RA National Security Council Gorik Hakobyan came to
the site.

The emergency team fixed at the site that Mheryan had got three shots
in the head and one in the body.

The RA Special Investigative Service has launched a criminal
investigation into the case.

RA President Serzh Sargsyan signed a decree, July 2, 2008, appointing
Gevorg Mheryan, 34, Deputy Chief of the RA Police. Prior to that,
Mheryan was the RA President’s Aide and was Chairman of the
Anti-Corruption Strategy Monitoring Group.

Recognition Of Artsakh People’s Right To Self-Determination Top Prio

RECOGNITION OF ARTSAKH PEOPLE’S RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION TOP PRIORITY FOR KARABAKH CONFLICT RESOLUTION

PanARMENIAN.Net
04.02.2009 14:45 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Azerbaijan presents his own interpretation of the
international law but it doesn’t mean that it’s correct, NKR President
Bako Sahakyan said in an interview with PanARMENIAN.Net.

"The principle of territorial integrity can’t dominate the
international law," he emphasized.

"Recognition of Kosovo, Abkhazia and South Ossetia is a vivid example
that the only way to resolve the Karabakh conflict is to recognize
the right of Artsakh people to self-determination," Mr. Sahakyan said.