PR Association Of Armenia And USAID Launch ‘Let’s Get Corruption Out

PR ASSOCIATION OF ARMENIA AND USAID LAUNCH ‘LET’S GET CORRUPTION OUT OF OUR LIFE’ PROGRAM IN ARMENIA

ArmInfo
2009-11-03 17:43:00

ArmInfo. PR Association of Armenia and USAID Mobilizing Action Against
Corruption (MAAC) program have launched a project "Let’s Get Corruption
Out of Our Life", Vice President of PR Association Arman Saghatelyan
told journalists, Tuesday. According to him, it is envisaged to draw
the public attention to the problems of mutual relations between
the state machinery and representatives of small and medium business
which is more vulnerable to corruption than big companies. "No matter
what they say about regional or international integration of Armenia,
a question arises: is our country ready to it at the level of people’s
thinking? Most of our specialists give a negative answer. For instance,
applying to court today is perceived as "burning of bridges", and not
a common method of protecting one’s own rights. When our understanding
of both this and many other issues is changed, it will be much easier
to protect the interests of both citizens and key social institutes,
including small and medium business",- Saghatelyan said.

In this context, the experience of those Diaspora Armenians who
come to Armenia to take up entrepreneurship may be quite valuable,
Saghatelyan said. Being carriers of other culture, these people have
no idea of the ways of settling problems that have been accepted in
Armenia where much depends on the search of an influential relative,
he said. "We want to tell about people that are ready to live and
work in their own country, but want their rights to be protected the
state machinery which is financed by their taxes",- Saghatelyan said.

Executive Director of PR Association of Armenia Tatevik Panosyan said
that under the program, which will last 6 months, media representatives
will visit lawsuits with participation of economic entities, as well
as take part in hearings together with economic experts from Armenia
and international organizations working in the country.

In Karabakh Everything Started In ’88

IN KARABAKH EVERYTHING STARTED IN ’88
Gegam Bagdasaryan

Osservatorio Balcani
/articleview/12042/1/407/
Nov 2 2009

Difficulties and small advantages in creating democratic institutions
in a country not recognised on an international level. Twenty years of
changes in Stepanakert 1988 represents a turning point in the recent
history of Nagorno-Karabakh: history is divided between "before" and
"after" that year. The citizens of Karabakh remember the "before"
with reluctance.

The Armenians living in the region, who represented the clear majority
of the population of the Autonomous Region of Nagorno-Karabakh in
the Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic, felt oppressed by the
Azeri minority.

According to the stories circulating at the time, it was forbidden
to sleep with your face facing Armenia and those who had studied in
Armenia had no chance of pursuing a career. Despite the fact that
the administrators of the Autonomous region of Nagorno-Karabakh were
"Armenian". Yet, they were "Armenian" between inverted commas, since
they were emissaries of Baku, educated or re-educated in that city,
meticulously forged at the school of the local party. And obviously
with a surname ending in "-ov", instead of the traditionally Armenian
"-yan". It is said that at that time the famous marshal Bagramyan
arrived to Stepanakert from Moscow. The local elite welcomed him and
started introducing themselves: Kevorov, Aslanov, Samvelov… "What’s
going on? Are we still not in Karabakh?" asked the distinguished
Armenian commander, with indignation.

In those years I was studying in Stepanakert at the Institute of
Pedagogy, dedicated to the 60th anniversary of the creation of Soviet
Azerbaijan; I studied Armenian language and literature, but it was
forbidden to teach Armenian history. It would be like training Italian
Literature teachers without allowing them to study Italian history.

But this is the way things were before Gorbachev’s perestroika. And
then all of a sudden the words perestrojka, uskorenie, glasnost’
started to appear… the citizens of Karabakh had waited a long time
for this, and they were the first ones to believe in it, open-heartedly
showing their aspirations and tribulations. Miatsum was the motto
in response to this, which means reunification with the motherland
Armenia. But the Kremlin reacted harshly, making it clear that it was
not only made up of progressive leaders following the motto "Lenin,
party, Grobachev", but also of conservative ones following the one
"Stalin, Beria, Ligachev", instead.

Perestrojka, uskorenie, glasnost’ were very popular slogans when the
movement for the liberation of Karabakh started to emerge, but soon
the feeling that they were nothing more than words began to spread. It
was an attempt at giving a face-lift to the empire. But the rotten
system couldn’t sustain it and rejected it.

The USSR collapsed, and in the chaos that followed Azerbaijan decided
to crush the aspirations of the Armenian population of Karabakh with
violence. After a difficult war the Karabakhi Armenians proclaimed
their independence and started to build their own state.

The first impression for the Armenian population of Karabakh was simply
amazing: we had our own army, police, symbols – Armenian ones -, our
own officials instead of emissaries, our own flag, national anthem
and official crest. The enthusiasm didn’t fade even when civil rights
started to be ignored by our newly appointed officials, when it was
"our own" police that was beating us up, when during trials it was
"our own" courts that didn’t do us justice, when the first villas
belonging to "our own" businessmen started to appear.

An acquaintance of mine used to joke about this by saying: "The
people obtained the symbols of independence: the flag, the crest,
the national anthem, while the bureaucrats obtained all the benefits".

Nonetheless, by slowly leaving the war behind, Karabakhi Armenians
started to worry not only about basic commodities, but also about their
own freedom, and hence started to fight to obtain it. Having fought for
years against an external enemy, they had to overcome a "psychological"
barrier and start "fighting" against their own authorities. It wasn’t
easy, but the struggle began. With alternate fortune. In 2004 the
opposition won the local elections, and its leader became the mayor
of Stepanakert. But that was followed by two significant failures in
2005 and 2007. Now the situation is at a stand by, while we wait for
the next elections.

Nowadays, Karabakhi Armenians are trying to build their democracy in a
very difficult situation: they are not recognised on an international
level, and the threat of a military action from Azerbaijan hangs
over them.

The situation is certainly not easy, but, for as strange as it may
sound, there are also some advantages to it. On the one hand there
is a clear lack of new upper level professionals due to isolation and
scarce resources, and at a first glance the pre-requisites to create
political parties, independent media and NGOs are still not in place.

But on the other hand the society in Karabakh is more compact and
flexible than elsewhere, due to the scarcely populated nature of the
region and, in a way, to the war. It can also count on its previous
experience of collective survival, it is less fractured and more
traditional, thus having better self-management skills. It has not been
spoiled by funding and subsidies, a fact that has positive aspects.

A further benefit of not being recognised on an international level
is the fact that the process of democratic transformation is not
being forcedly accelerated, since such an artificial acceleration
could paradoxically produce the opposite effect of impoverishing the
democratic principles. Karabakh is not a member of the European Council
or any other international institution, hence it is not expected to
force events and it is not subject to binding obligations.

Therefore, it seems like everything follows a more natural development
in this country.

Obviously, the population realises that solving the matter of the
official recognition of Karabakh would mean having more development
opportunities. Nonetheless, as a friend of mine often says, there are
worse tragedies in the world than not being officially recognised:
AIDS, earthquakes, the ozone hole and so on. Karabakh Armenians
value the opportunity to preserve their national identity as the
most important result. It is certainly not easy, but at least we can
breath freely.

http://www.osservatoriobalcani.org/article

Armeconombank Encourages Fair Borrowers With $500 Credit Line

ARMECONOMBANK ENCOURAGES FAIR BORROWERS WITH $500 CREDIT LINE

ArmInfo
2009-11-02 12:03:00

ArmInfo. Armeconombank is launching a project on encouragement of fair
borrowers with MasterCard credit cards, opening a credit line of $500,
Head of Plastic Cards Department of Armeconombank Vardan Yeghiazaryan
told ArmInfo.

He said the bank schedules to provide new credit cards to the borrowers
having a multi- year positive credit history in Armeconombank. "I am
sure that our clients will be pleased to receive a new unsecured loan",
he emphasized and added that the annual interest rate on credits within
the frames of the action will be lower than the average market one.

According to Armeconombank’s data, the number of the bank’s plastic
cards as of October 1 made up 72056 pieces, 6818 of which are
MasterCard and 72056 – ArCa. The balance on the bank’s card accounts
as of this date made up 2.824 bln drams, and the size of credits on
cards – 1.571 bln drams. In general, Armeconombank had 51 ATM as of
October 1, 2009, 35 of which – in Yerevan and 16 – in the country’s
regions. The bank’s POS-terminals as of October 1 made up 210, 34 of
which – cashed (17 – in Yerevan, 17 – in the regions).

Italian Companies Take Interest In Projects Implemented In Armenian

ITALIAN COMPANIES TAKE INTEREST IN PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED IN ARMENIAN RAILWAY SYSTEM

NOYAN TAPAN
NOVEMBER 2, 2009
YEREVAN

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 2, NOYAN TAPAN. During the November 2 meeting
with the Italian Ambassador to Armenia Bruno Scapini, RA Minister of
Transport and Communication Gurgen Sargsyan presented the projects
being implemented in the sector. He said that the preliminary
feasibility study on construction of the Iran-Armenia railway has
already been completed: it was done by ILF company (Austria) with money
of the Hayastan All-Armenian Fund. Negotiations for a final feasibility
study are now being conducted witn the Asian Development Bank.

B. Scapini in his turn said Italferr company takes interest in the
projects being implemented in the raiway system of Armenia. In his
words, a number of other Italian companies are also interested in
various projects of the Armenian transport sector.

According to Susanna Tonoyan, spokeswoman for the RA minister of
transport and communication, an Italian road construction company
is already operating in Armenia. A joint venture of two consulting
companies – IRD (Italy) and Safege (Belgium) ensure quality control
of the road construction work within the World Bank’s Lifeline Roads
Improvement Project.

Azerbaijan And Turkish Leaders Held Phone Conversation Second Time F

AZERBAIJAN AND TURKISH LEADERS HELD PHONE CONVERSATION SECOND TIME FOR LAST 10 DAYS

Azerbaijan Business Center
Oct 30 2009

Baku, Fineko/abc.az. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev called
yesterday to his Turkish counterpart Abdullah Gul.

The Azerbaijani Presidential Administration’s press service informs
that President Aliyev wished the Turkish leader many happy returns
of the day and congratulated him on the occasion of Turkey’s national
holiday – the Day of Republic.

The Turkish President voiced his gratitude for congratulations and
displayed attention and gave his wishes to the Azerbaijani people. In
the course of the conversation the parties exchanged views on a range
of issues of mutual interest.

On 21 October, the Turkish leader himself phoned President Aliyev. The
two leaders covered then bipartite relationships, ways of settlement
of Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno Garabagh conflict, and Turkish-Armenian
links.

Mr. Gul reiterated that without solution of the matter of Garabagh
conflict Turkish-Armenian ties could not be normalized. President
Aliyev, in his turn, thanked him.

After signing of the protocols between the Ministries of Foreign
Affairs of Turkey and Armenia and the insulting of Azerbaijani state
flag before Turkish-Armenian soccer match (unfurling of Azerbaijani
flags at the stadium was banned and the Turkish police simply threw out
Azeri flags into garbage cans) the Azerbaijani-Turkish relationships
incandesced. Azerbaijan is also displeased with Turkey’s position on
the occasion of Azeri gas transit through Turkish territory and made
statements about possible refusal from gas transit through Turkey.

Moldovan Region’S Foreign Minister Visits Karabakh

MOLDOVAN REGION’S FOREIGN MINISTER VISITS KARABAKH

Pridnestrovye (in Russian)
Oct 29 2009
Dniester

A delegation of the foreign ministry of Moldova’s breakaway
Dniester region, headed by foreign minister Vladimir Yastrebchak,
has paid a three-day official visit to Stepanakert, the capital
of Azerbaijan’s breakaway region Nagornyy Karabakh, the Dniester
newspaper Pridnestrovye reported on 29 October.

The delegation met representatives of the Nagornyy Karabakh parliament
and discussed cooperation between the Dniester region and Nagornyy
Karabakh, the newspaper said.

The Dniester delegation, jointly with Nagornyy Karabakh foreign
minister Georgiy Petrosyan, also visited a memorial complex dedicated
to those who died during World War II and the Nagornyy Karabakh
conflict, the newspaper added.

PACE Report: Harassment Of Journalists And Direct Controls On The Me

PACE REPORT: HARASSMENT OF JOURNALISTS AND DIRECT CONTROLS ON THE MEDIA INTENSIFIED AROUND THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN ARMENIA

ArmInfo
2009-10-29 16:45:00

ArmInfo. Harassment of journalists and direct controls on the media
intensified around the time of the February 2009 presidential election,
PACE report says.

Four states, Armenia, Moldova, Azerbaijan and Russia, were classified
as "Not Free", as was Belarus, the only European state not yet
accepted as a member of the Council of Europe because of fundamental
failings in its record for democratic governance and the protection
of human rights.

Several journalists including photographer Gagik Shamshyan were injured
in assaults by police during protests after the election. CPJ reported
that a reporter, Lusine Barseghan, was assaulted while attempting
to document abuses at a Yerevan polling station. During a three-week
long State of Emergency all independent reporting was banned. In March
2007 similar government controls on the media were imposed during a
temporary State of Emergency under the previous administration. Several
other journalists suffered assaults in 2008, including Hrach Melkumyan,
Yerevan bureau chief of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Edik
Baghdasaryan, editor of the online news magazine Hetq and chair of
Armenian Association of Investigative Journalists. 54. On 30 April 2009
Argishti Kivirian, editor of the online news website Armenia Today,
was attacked by three unknown assailants outside his home in Yerevan,
leaving him with severe injuries. He was reportedly beaten on his
head and body with clubs or wooden poles and one of the attackers
also fired gunshots which caused no injuries. Colleagues said they
believed the attack was related to his work.

Turkish Parliament Won’t Ratify Protocols With Armenia – Azeri Parli

TURKISH PARLIAMENT WON’T RATIFY PROTOCOLS WITH ARMENIA – AZERI PARLIAMENTARIAN

Interfax
Oct 28 2009
Russia

The Turkish parliament will not ratify the protocols on the
normalization of Turkish-Armenian relations, Mubariz Gurbanly, a
deputy executive secretary of the Azeri ruling party Yeni Azerbaijan
and a parliament member, told Interfax.

"The leadership of the Turkish parliamentary committee on international
relations assured us in Ankara that it would send these protocols
back," Gurbanly said.

"The committee will return the protocols, and the likelihood that
the protocols may be put up for the parliament’s consideration is
very low," he said.

"Armenia was given a carte blanche so as to demonstrate a constructive
approach in resolving the most difficult conflict in the region over
Nagorno-Karabakh. This constructive approach was not demonstrated,
and therefore Turkey will not ratify these protocols," Gurbanly said.

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu and Armenian Foreign Minister
Edward Nalbandian signed protocols on normalizing diplomatic relations
between the two states and opening the Turkish-Armenian border in
Zurich on October 10. To take legal effect, the protocols need to be
ratified by the parliaments of the two countries.

AlJazeera: Turkey’s Erdogan Views Position On Israel, Regional Coope

TURKEY’S ERDOGAN VIEWS POSITION ON ISRAEL, REGIONAL COOPERATION, EU

Al-Jazeera (in Arabic)
Oct 25 2009
Qatar

Doha Al-Jazeera Satellite Channel Television in Arabic, independent
television station financed by the Qatari Government, at 1730 gmt on
25 October carries on its "Special Encounter" political talk show a
28-minute interview with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyib Erdogan
by Yusuf al-Sharif. The place and date of the interview are not given.

Questions are in Arabic; Erdogan responds in Turkish fading into
superimposed Arabic translation.

Al-Sharif begins the interview with the following question: "You
criticized Israel heavily and sharply during the Gaza war. You are
still criticizing it and demanding that it be brought to account
for using white phosphorous against civilians in Gaza. You are
also demanding that Israel’s nuclear facilities be inspected, the
way Iranian nuclear facilities are inspected. Turkey has cancelled
the aerial military manoeuvres with Israel this month. After all
this tension, can the current Turkish-Israeli ties be described as a
strategic alliance? Is this a passing cloud or are there deep problems
between Turkey and Israel?"

Replying, Erdogan says that his reactions "were based on the
fact that Turkey is an important nation in this area, following
closely the developments in this region." He adds: "However, these
reactions were not within a religious or ethnic context but within
a humanitarian context." Erdogan says: "Had we not dealt with this
issue from this perspective, our stand would not have been fair. If
some have appreciated and praised this stand of ours, it was due to
the fairness and humanitarian nature of our stand.

"Concerning the Middle East problems, we always listen to the
voice of our conscience and the reaction of the street. We take a
middle-of-the-road position. We have not tried to be a party to what
happened. If some accused us of standing by one side against the
other, we would say that we always stand in support of the truth,
and with the oppressed, without any hesitation.

"Weapons of mass destruction were used in Gaza and this is a fact.

Phosphorous bombs are mass destruction weapons. Can we see this and
remain silent? This will not be fair."

Erdogan says that Turkey has seen how the world rushed to stop the war
in Georgia, "and we were among those who contributed" to this effort
"but we failed to understand why the world waited for two weeks and
was a spectator during the war on Gaza without making any move,"
noting that "this was a regrettable stand that cannot be explained."

He adds that nine months have passed since the Gaza events and almost
seven month have passed since the donors conference was held in
Sharm al-Shaykh, but no part of the promised reconstruction process
has been implemented. The Gaza infrastructure totally collapsed and
so many promises were made to rebuild it but until now the building
materials are prevented from arriving in Gaza. Again I ask why the
West continues to be silent on this siege.

"Look at the contents of the Goldstone Report. Atrocities were
mentioned in the report, which the Human Rights Council adopted. These
are facts. These things are extremely serious and everyone must
pause and think about them. The United nations must shoulder its
responsibilities towards this report. The report should not meet
the same fate that hundreds of UN resolutions concerning Israel met
and remained unimplemented. Schools were bombed in Gaza – schools
belonging to the United Nations – and Hospitals. Hundreds of civilians
were killed and injured in this war. Some of them came to Turkey for
treatment and I visited them and talked to them and I have seen their
tragedies. I cannot remain silent after seeing what I have seen with
my own eyes.

"We have signed many agreements with Israel. While I am talking now,
I am not being hostile to Israel, but if we say that we are friends
in this region, we must respect our relationships.

"Until recently, Israel had been trusting Turkey and accepting its
mediations with Syria for the sake of peace. Suddenly, Turkey has
become a state that cannot be trusted. Then why did you trust us in
the past? This means that an important change has occurred in the
minds of the Israeli politicians. That is the problem. We hope that
we will overcome these differences for the sake of salvaging peace,
which has been delayed for so long."

Asked if this means that he will follow the developments concerning
the Goldstone Report at the United Nations to the end, he says:
"Naturally. No doubt about this. Those who are responsible for
this report must follow its development to the end in order to
have results." Asked if the United States is mediating, even if
unofficially, to reduce the tension between Turkey and Israel, he
says: "We are not talking about the possibility of severing legal
and official relations with Israel. We have relations and agreements
with Israel but we also should respect the desire of the people
and the average citizens. Our cancellation of the aerial military
manoeuvres with Israel was within this context, due to the Gaza
war. I represent the people and I have to listen to what the people
say. These manoeuvres are Turkish manoeuvres and Turkey is the side
that can decide who can join and participate in them. Nobody can impose
anything on us in this connection. In the past Israel participated
in these manoeuvres at our invitation, but now, due to the Gaza war,
we have decided not to invite it."

Asked if "the cancellation of the military manoeuvres between Turkey
and Israel was really a political response to the Gaza war or was it
a military response to the delay by Israel of the delivery of drones
that Turkey had bought from Israel," he replies: "No, no. This issue
had nothing to do with cancelling the manoeuvres. The purchase of
the drones and the delay in their delivery is an issue that is being
followed with legal circles. The delivery of the drones has been
delayed, and their delivery is long overdue. It is not a recent thing.

The Defence Ministry is following this issue."

Asked how he can criticize Israel so strongly and at the same time
meet with the Jewish lobby in the United States and "have good
relations" with it, Erdogan says he met with about 50 officials and
representatives of the Jewish groups and "I talked to them clearly
and frankly," adding that he told them: "If you trust us we will
tell the truth even if it is painful to you. Can anyone of you
condone the killing of 1,500 women and children with lethal mass
destruction weapons? How can you convince me? How will you justify
injuring over 5,000 civilians and the destroying schools and hospitals
and infrastructure? I told them that Israel has used its most lethal
weapons in a lopsided battle and these things cannot be justified or
explained at all. They did not provide any response to what I said."

Al-Sharif asks Erdogan why it is that every time a positive round
of negotiations between Iran and the West takes place, "we witness
negative developments that cast a shadow on these negotiations," such
as "the announcement about the new Iranian nuclear facility following
the 1 October negotiations and the recent bombings in southeastern
Iran, which Tehran said were backed by the United States and Britain."

He asks Erdogan what he will be taking with him to Iran, "especially
because you will be leaving Iran to the United States." Erdogan
says he will go first to Pakistan and then to Tehran. He adds: "The
Pakistani-Iranian relations are extremely important. Both countries
are suffering and facing some problems. Through your television,
I would like to offer my condolences to all the Iranians over the
victims they sustained in the Baluchistan bombing, which killed 40
Iranians. We are aware of the tragedies and injustices that terrorism
causes because regrettably we experienced it and we do not want others
to experience it."

Erdogan says that he "has offered condolences to President
Ahmadinezhad," and adds: "I oppose severing relations between Iran
and the West." He notes that "after our meeting at the UN Security
Council, it was announced that an International Atomic Energy Agency
[IAEA] delegation would leave for Iran on 25 October to inspect the
new Iranian nuclear facility, and that the delegation would submit
a report on this issue."

Erdogan adds: "Sometime back, fake reports were disseminated about
the Iranian nuclear activities and Al-Baradi’i declared that they were
fake and fabricated and had nothing to do with the IAEA. We will know
the facts of the new Iranian facility after 25 October." He says:
"We are against Iran having nuclear arms – not only Iran but all
states in the region. It is unfair and unacceptable for a state to
have nuclear arms in the region, and yet be ignored, while emphasis
is placed only on Iran. This is unfair. The entire region must be
purged of these weapons. The IAEA should expand its inspection to
include non-member countries."

He says: "Iran must continue its dialogue with the West because it
is the natural thing to do. No results can be reached without dialogue.

Normal relations must be established between Iran and Western
countries. As for imposing sanctions on Iran, the consequences of this
method is clear to all. Our stand on this issue is well-known." He
says that states that possess nuclear weapons must not ask Iran not
to try to have similar weapons.

Asked what Turkey is planning to do in the region, given the
improvement of its relations with Syria and Iraq, and if Turkey is
trying to revive the Ottoman history, Erdogan replies that these are
extremely important steps, especially because they include strategic
economic cooperation, which will ensure close relations among these
states. He adds: "On the one hand, we have established the Strategic
Cooperation Council with Syria, and on the other hand we started to
activate another cooperation council with Iraq." He says there will
be projects in the fields of education, health, trade, security,
military industrialization, transportation, agriculture and energy,
"and these will serve the interests of the three states but they will
not harm anyone."

He says: "Mutual investments will multiply and after bilateral
investments there will be trilateral investments, and this will no
doubt lead to greater coordination and cooperation on the political
level based on joint interests." He says the 21st century is the
age of openness and partnership and Iraq needs Syria and Turkey to
support its progress.

Asked about his future vision of these regional projects and if it
is possible to include Iran and Israel in such regional cooperation,
Erdogan says: "We are working on a similar agreement with Russia,
and I suggested this to Mr Putin during his visit to Ankara, and he
agreed." He says he hopes such an agreement will be signed in Moscow
shortly, and adds: "We will establish a joint strategic cooperation
council between Turkey and Russia. We also suggested the same thing to
Greece and we are thinking of including the Caucasus states in this."

Asked if this is an alternative to joining the EU, he replies: "These
projects have nothing whatever to do with the EU. The EU is a political
project," and adds: "we will present this strategic cooperation idea
to neighbouring EU member states such as Romania and Bulgaria," and
continues: "This will not be against the EU but it will perhaps pave
the way and make easier Turkey’s entry into the EU in the future."

Asked why Turkey has been persistent in its efforts to join the
EU despite the successes that it realized in the Middle East and
"what the EU can possibly realize for Turkey," Erdogan replies:
"Turkey is a democratic and secular state and there are 27 members in
the EU. Our joining this group of states will strengthen our vision
and enhance our plans for the future." He says joining the EU will
increase Turkey’s strength and it will not lose anything, adding that
"we are also colleagues of many EU states in NATO and in the group of
security and cooperation, and all these things should have speeded up
Turkey’s membership of the EU, and adds: "It is regrettable that the
EU is not paying attention to these things. The EU should not place
obstacles to our entry. What is their justification? They say that
the population of Turkey is big and we say that this population will
increase the strength of the EU." He says the conditions of Turkey
are much better than the conditions of many EU members, and regrets
"statements by some leaders of the European states."

Erdogan says: "Only one state in the region can extend full support
for Iraq and realize the greatest amount of harmony and integration;
namely Turkey." He argues that Turkey will be the most important and
secure territory for a network to transfer the Iraqi oil to the world.

On the Kurdish issue, he says that some of the Kurds are members
of a peaceful opposition in Turkey and some are carrying up arms
and they are "promoting terrorism against Turkey." He says Turkey
is determined to confront them by all means because "resisting
terrorism is the simplest and most important right of the state,"
noting that the Turkish state respects any opposition party within its
democratic system. He says that the Kurdish rebels are being financed
by organizations abroad, noting that the United States and Europe
have some of these organizations. He adds that the United States
froze the accounts of three PKK leaders due to their involvement in
the drug trade. He says the European states are not cooperating with
Turkey in this connection.

Asked about the PKK Kurds who returned to Turkey, saying that they have
a message of peace, he says that this is the result of our project;
namely, the democratic openness, "but some are trying to distort what
we did," giving it other meanings.

On relations with Armenia and the Zurich protocol, he says the Turkish
government has sent the protocol to the speaker of Parliament and they
will begin working on it, noting that Turkey awaits support from the
Minsk group, which is working on a solution for the Nagorno Karabakh
issue. He adds: "Without efforts by the Minsk group to solve the
dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan, it would be very difficult
for us to make any progress on the protocol. We have sent the foreign
minister and his adviser to inform our Azeri brothers of the situation
and put them in the picture before we sign the protocol."

Asked in conclusion if he does not believe that President Obama is
incapable of fulfilling the promises he made to activate the middle
East peace process and that he looks timid vis-a-vis the new Israeli
government, Erdogan replies: "It is not easy to realize the promises
of the US President. He has been president for only 10 months and he
is trying to resolve chronic problems."

Erdogan says he will leave Iran for the United States and will meet
with President Obama and talk to him on these issues. He adds: "You are
aware that President Obama has won the Nobel peace prize. Giving him
this prize at such an early date is significant. We all know how and
when an official wins the Nobel peace prize. One of the most important
points that I will emphasize during my Washington visit will be the
need for Washington to continue using its weight and determination to
activate the Middle East peace process without any hesitation, retreat,
or slackness." He adds: "We have not lost our hope for peace yet. I
expect that the US President will fulfil his promises and I hope that
he will be as I asked him to be; namely, the voice of the oppressed
and wronged people in this world. I believe that he has given important
promises in his speeches in Cairo and Ankara and he must fulfil them."

Benedict XVI Congratulates Karekin II With The Decade Mission Of Sup

BENEDICT XVI CONGRATULATES KAREKIN II WITH THE DECADE MISSION OF SUPREME PATRIARCH

PanARMENIAN.Net
28.10.2009 12:55 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Pope Benedict XVI congratulated Karekin II with
the tenth anniversary of his election and enthronement as the Supreme
Patriarch of the Armenian Apostolic Church, by sending a message to
him today. The Pope told the Patriarch that he hopes the good relations
between the two Churches would "continue to grow in the years ahead."

In the Pope’s words, Karekin II’s work has been "remarkable," an
assessment that he went on to spell out in his message. The Pontiff
praised "the flourishing of new initiatives for the Christian education
of the young, for the training of clergy, the creation of new parishes,
the building of new churches and community centers, as well as the
promotion of Christian values in the social and cultural life of
the nation."