NKR: Complex Field Pests Combat Is Anticipated

COMPLEX FIELD PESTS COMBAT IS ANTICIPATED

NKR Government Information and Public Relations Department
October 13, 2009

In connection with intensification of rodents’ epidemic in arable lands
of the Republic, today, the NKR Prime Minister Ara Haroutyunyan has
conducted a conference with heads of regional administrations, chiefs
of agricultural divisions, and specialists. The Vice Prime Minister,
Minister of Finance S.Tevosyan and the Minister of Agriculture
A.Tsatryan were present at the conference.

In the information about spreading of danger the Minister of
Agriculture noted that lately specialists from Armenia have
carried out studies in the Republic. They stated that spread of
rodents’ epidemic is very extended and the combat must be started
immediately. Specialists, present at the conference, expressed their
considerations, adding proposals to the list of anticipated measures.

Taking into account the considerations, the Prime Minister announced
about necessity of complex measures conducting for which special
headquarters must be founded, and involvement of all state services
and the population in the works to be conducted is needed. First of
all farming of areas nearby villages, and executing cold tillage was
foreseen. Owners of rented plough-lands will be exempted from the
rent. The Minister of Agriculture was assigned a task to work out a
clear programme of measures, which will be implemented into practice
within the next few days.

At the conference, heads of regional administrations and the Director
of Village and Agriculture Relief Fund announced information on the
credits repayment process. The overall picture is not satisfying
yet, therefore the Prime Minister assigned special task to competent
persons.

Turkey Beats Armenia 2-0

TURKEY BEATS ARMENIA 2-0

s-armenia-2-0-2/
Oct 14th, 2009

BURSA, Turkey-The Turkish national team beat Armenia 2-0 in a European
Cup qualifying match on Wednesday held at Ataturk Stadium in the
backdrop of a visit by Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian to Turkey
following Saturday’s signing of the Turkey-Armenia protocols.

Sarkisian arrived in Turkey late Wednesday afternoon, accompanied by
his foreign minister Eduard Nalbandian and other high-level Armenian
officials. They were greeted at the airport by Turkish foreign minister
Ahmet Davutoglu.

Turkish fans gathered at the stadium waving Turkish and Azeri
flags. News.am reported that as the van transporting the Armenian
national soccer team arrived at the stadium, Turkish fans threw rocks
and other objects.

The fans in the stadium, which was packed mainly by Turks, hissed
while the Armenian national anthem played, reported new.am.

Head Coach of the Armenian national football team Vardan Minasyan
announced the list of the 11 soccer players for the match earlier on
Wednesday. They are as follows:

Goaley: Roman Berezovsky; Defense: Aghvan Lazarian, Robert Arzumanyan,
Hrayr Mkoyan and Sargis Hovsepyan (team captain); Midfielders:
Karlen Lazarian, Ararat Arakelyan and Arman Karamyan; Forwards:
Artavazd Karamyan, Henrik Mkhitaryan and Hovhannes Goharyan.

http://www.asbarez.com/2009/10/14/turkey-beat

U.S. NATO Chief Blames Turkey For ‘Ethnic Cleansing’ Of Greeks, Incl

U.S. NATO CHIEF BLAMES TURKEY FOR ‘ETHNIC CLEANSING’ OF GREEKS, INCLUDING OWN FAMILY
By Amir Oren

Ha’aretz
Thu., October 15, 2009 Tishrei 27, 5770

U.S. Navy Admiral James Stavridis, the senior American officer in both
the U.S. European Command and NATO, blames Turkey for violence against
its Greek minority, including his own family, almost 90 years ago.

In a first-person book he published last year, before he took over
as NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR), Stavridis termed
Turkey’s moves "ethnic cleansing" and a "pogrom," whose victims
included his grandparents, expelled from their hometown of Izmir,
and his father’s uncle, who was killed by violent anti-Greek Turks.

Advertisement

Fighter planes from United States Air Forces in Europe (USAFE) and
other elements under Stavridis’ command were to have taken part in
the Anatolian Eagle exercise, from which the U.S. withdrew earlier
this week, after Turkey barred Israel from participating. Stavridis
is closely supervising the upcoming American-Israeli Juniper Cobra air
and missile defense exercise, and is scheduled to visit Israel soon.

After being nominated to his current position, a mere year after
publishing these charges against Turkey, Stavridis dropped the
negative reference to Turkish treatment of his family and other ethnic
Greeks. His current, sanitized version depicts Turkey as a starting
point for a one-stop journey west to America.

Stavridis, a 1976 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy, was born in
Florida and hardly speaks any Greek. As a child, he lived for two
years in Athens, where his father, a U.S. Marine Corps officer, served
in the American Embassy alongside a U.S. Navy officer whose daughter
Stavridis later married. The four-star admiral is widely acclaimed as
a brilliant officer, with a Ph.D. in international relations and an
impressive record of command and staff positions. Currently, he wears
two hats: In addition to his job at NATO – of which Turkey is a member,
with forces serving in Afghanistan and working to prevent terr across
its border with Iraq – he heads the U.S. European Command (EUCOM),
which includes Greece, Turkey and Israel among its dozens of countries.

A prolific writer of books and articles, with his own blog ("From
the Bridge") on the EUCOM web site, Stavridis kept a journal of
his experiences during the 28 months he commanded the destroyer
USS Barry, from early fall 1993 to December 1995. During that time,
the Aegis-class warship, armed with powerful radar and anti-missile
missiles (of the sort taking part in Juniper Cobra), was deployed in
crises the world over – off Haiti, in the Mediterranean and in the
Persian Gulf.

In 2008, before he learned he would be appointed NATO’s military chief
– the first ever from the navy – he published his 1990s journal as
a book, "Destroyer Captain: Lessons of a First Command." Thus the
manuscript he authored in his late thirties, as a relatively junior
Commander, was launched into the public domain more than a dozen
years later, when he was five ranks higher.

In "Destroyer Captain," Stavridis does not try to be diplomatic. "In
the early 1920’s," he wrote, "my grandfather, a short, stocky Greek
schoolteacher named Dimitrious Stavridis, was expelled from Turkey
as part of ‘ethnic cleansing’ (read pogrom) directed against Greeks
living in the remains of the Ottoman Empire. He barely escaped with
his life in a small boat crossing the Aegean Sea to Athens and thence
to Ellis Island. His brother was not so lucky and was killed by the
Turks as part of the violence directed at the Greek minority."

The "most amazing historical irony I could imagine," according to the
author, was when a multinational NATO exercise off the coast of western
Turkey brought him to the place his grandfather was forced out of: "His
grandson, who speaks barely a few words of Greek, returns in command
of a billion-dollar destroyer to the very city – Smyrna, now called
Izmir – from which he sailed in a refugee craft all those years ago."

In an interview about "Destroyer Captain" on the U.S. Naval Institute
web l let others decide if it’s a good book, but I truly believe it
is an honest book."

He was, however, less than fully candid last March, during his Armed
Services Committee confirmation hearing. The ethnic cleansing he
sharply rebuked in the book (and which he contrasted with U.S. efforts
worldwide to prevent) underwent some semantic cleansing. "It’s probably
worth noting that although I’m ethnically Greek, my grandfather was
actually born in Turkey and came through Greece on his way to the
United States," he said, as if equally proud of his double origin,
much like the child of divorced parents boasting that he now has two
families rather than only one.

Last July, having visited Turkey as NATO and EUCOM chief, he again
chose similar words to describe his personal connection to the country
that ill-treated his grandparents. "Turkey is a vital and important
NATO ally," he blogged, "and for me it was a chance to return to the
nation from which my grandfather and grandmother emigrated to the
United States, after stopping briefly in Greece."

The Turkish military is not in the habit of ignoring criticism,
even from fellow officers. Last February, when Haaretz reported the
stinging attack on Turkish actions in Cyprus and against Armenian
civilians voiced by Israeli Ground Forces commander Maj. Gen. Avi
Mizrahi, the uproar in Ankara made Israel Defense Forces Chief of
Staff Gabi Ashkenazi call his counterpart, Gen. Ilker Sasbug, to
distance the IDF from Mizrahi’s "personal" opinion.

The Report ‘First Elections Of The Mayor Of Yerevan’ Is Bad Work Of

THE REPORT ‘FIRST ELECTIONS OF THE MAYOR OF YEREVAN’ IS BAD WORK OF SECRETARIAT OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE, HEAD OF ARMENIAN DELEGATION TO THE CONGRESS OF COUNCIL OF EUROPE THINKS

ArmInfo
2009-10-14 18:42:00

ArmInfo. The report ‘First elections of the mayor of Yerevan’ is
bad work of Secretariat of the Council of Europe, head of Armenian
delegation to the Congress of Council of Europe, Emin Yeritsyan,
told Arminfo correspondent.

‘We have arranged with Secretariat and the rapporteur that some points
of the report will be changed on 15 October over the debates. The
amendments are of technical nature and, in particular, are regarding
the name of the document, as they are not the elections of the mayor of
Yerevan but the municipal elections’, – Yeritsyan said. He also added
that the expressions in the text of the document about ‘convergence
between the political class and business world in Armenia’, as well
as ‘general trend of consolidation of the authoritarian rule’ are an
absolute nonsense. ‘The document has been prepared eclectically and
reflects the opinion of representatives of the opposition forces and
non-governmental organizations. But the rapporteur himself removes it
from the text as, if such an assessment is justified – in that case
Armenia cannot simply be a member-state of the Council of Europe’,
– Yeritsyan said.

Why May Turkey Change Its Mind?

WHY MAY TURKEY CHANGE ITS MIND?
Hakob Badalyan

hos15527.html
14:38:07 – 13/10/2009

Answering reporters’ questions at the airport, Serge Sargsyan says if
the Turkish parliament is not going to ratify the Armenian-Turkish
protocols why it signed them in Zurich. Really. Why did the Turks
sign if they are not going to ratify the protocols? We may answer
this question in the following way: not in all the countries,
the parliament is an adjunct system of the government and does
exceptionally what the government says. We may answer saying that there
are countries where the political system is soberer, resistive and
have counterbalance mechanisms which give to the country flexibility
and great possibility in foreign issues. Perhaps, if Serge Sargsyan
was managed to be persuaded in this question, he would have not asked
this question at the airport. If he asks it, this means that Serge
Sargsyan is sure such a thing is impossible and in all the countries,
everything is decided by the will of one person or a group of people.

What answer may be given to Serge Sargsyan question. For example,
one of the possible answers may be that the Turkish government signs
the protocols then it may change its mind and may not ratify them. But
in this case, Serge Sargsyan may ask, why the Turkish government has
to change its mind in several days. And really. What has to happen
for the Turkish government to change its mind? Say the Turks may
change their mind if the Armenian national football team wins the
Turkish one during the 2010 world qualifiers. But this game does
not decide anything because the Turks do not have any chance to pass
the qualifiers, consequently, they may gift the game to the Armenian
deepening the tolerant image of their nation and country that they
are shaping by establishing relations with Armenia.

The Turks may also change their mind because of the reason what Armenia
did not want to make concessions in connection with the Karabakh
issue. From this point of view, the situation is really vague. The
Karabakh issue is not a direct condition though it is doubtless
that the process of the normalization of the Armenian and Turkish
relations makes logically inevitable its connection with it. But
in this connection either, it is vague what concessions have been
promised to the Turks that it can change its mind with regard to the
ratification if the pledge is not fulfilled. In order to have a minimal
idea in this connection we have to imagine what kind of concessions
Turkey would like. It demands openly the return of released areas,
territorial integrity of Azerbaijan and immunity of borders. But
is this what Turkey expects in connection with Karabakh? And maybe
Turkey does not expect any tangible move in this direction besides
its involvement in the present process.

Perhaps Turkey needs this to expand its geopolitical resources and
not the "territorial integrity" of Azerbaijan. Turkey does not care
whose army is in Horadiz if it lacks in the frameworks of those
issues. Consequently, Turkey’s expectation is to be practically
involved in the process of the Karabakh settlement. And under the
name of Karabakh settlement there have been taking place many wide
developments for long time which refer to the development in our
region as well as adjacent regions.

This is what Turkey needs. And from this point, Turkey’s expectation
is not from Armenia but from the international society, better to
say superpower. They may agree or refuse Turkey’s involvement in the
wide frames of regional discussions. It is another question that the
superpowers may use Armenia for this purpose. From this point, Serge
Sargsyan’s question should be asked to superpowers whether they will
create grounds for Turkey to change its mind and what role they have
allocated for Armenia in all this.

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments-lra

Winners Of Nobel Prize For Economics Announced

WINNERS OF NOBEL PRIZE FOR ECONOMICS ANNOUNCED

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
13.10.2009 17:52 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The 2009 Nobel season ended on Monday with the
announcement of the winner of the prize for Economics.

Elinor Ostrom and Oliver Williamson won the 2009 Nobel prize for
economics on Monday for their work in economic governance. The Royal
Swedish Academy of Sciences said the award recognized Ostrom for
showing how common property can be managed by user associations and
Williamson for a theory on corporate conflict resolution.

Ostrom became the first woman to win the economics prize, which was
established in 1968.

Ostrom, a political scientist at Indiana University, showed how
common resources – forests, fisheries, oilfields, grazing lands and
irrigation systems – can be managed successfully by the people who
use them, rather than by governments or private companies.

Williamson, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley,
focused on how companies and markets differ in resolving conflicts. He
found that companies are typically better able than markets to resolve
conflicts when competition is limited.

Ankara Must Decide

ANKARA MUST DECIDE

Jerusalem Post
Oct 12, 2009 19:56

Who would have thought – Turkey and Armenia agreeing to normalize
political relations. Armenia’s president planning to attend a football
match in Turkey. And George Papandreou, the new Greek prime minister,
making Turkey the destination of his first trip abroad.

These are encouraging examples of how age-old animosities are being
relegated to the dustbin of history.

Too bad, then, that Ankara appears to be simultaneously doing
everything it can to junk its relationship with the Jewish state.

On Sunday, in an unprecedented slap in the face, Turkey cancelled joint
military exercises that were to have included pilots from Israel and
NATO. At first, the Turkish Foreign Ministry lamely denied politics was
involved. Then Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu admitted on CNN that
only when the "situation in Gaza" is improved could "a new atmosphere
in Turkish-Israeli relations" be established.

Analysts in Jerusalem suspect the government of Prime Minister
Recep Tayyip Erdogan is using the unfortunate civilian deaths during
Operation Cast Lead as a pretext for distancing Turkey from Israel –
diplomatically, strategically and economically.

ORDINARY Israelis find it hard to believe that faced with similar
provocations – its population pounded by 8,000 rockets, murderous
cross-border incursions, the kidnapping of one of its soldiers, the
refusal of the enemy to abide by a cease-fire – the Turkish military
would have refrained from taking action to stop the rocket fire and
reestablish its deterrence out of fear that in defending its own
citizens the lives of enemy civilians would be jeopardized.

Indeed, it is debatable whether more Palestinians died at the hands
of Israel in the Gaza conflict than Muslim Kurds died in Ankara’s
repeated bombardments of northern Iraq (though Turkey insists that
the only Kurdish loses were to livestock).

Political scientist Efraim Inbar is convinced that Erdogan’s Islamic
AKP party places greater value on Tur ith the Muslim world than on
its political and cultural links to the West. Or does Turkey expect
to jettison its relationship with Israel, cozy up to Iran and Hamas,
and yet maintain strong ties with Washington and Brussels?

ISRAEL’S relationship with Turkey has always had its ups and
downs. Turkey voted against the 1947 UN Partition Resolution to create
two states – Jewish and Arab – in Palestine, but it quickly established
diplomatic relations with Israel. In the 1970s, weathering an economic
crisis, it began building bridges to the Arab world. By the 1980s,
thousands of Turks were working throughout the Middle East. The
Iran-Iraq War cemented ties between Turkey and the Arabs when Saudi
Arabia began supplying oil to Ankara.

Even during periods when the Turkish military was in power, relations
with Israel were sometimes sacrificed to persuade the masses that
the government had Islamic bona fides. In 1975, Turkey recognized
the PLO though the group was then publicly committed to Israel’s
destruction. In 1979, Turkey refused to participate in the Eurovision
Song Contest because it was being held in Jerusalem. Following
the Knesset’s passage, in 1980, of the Basic Law affirming united
Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, Ankara closed its consulate in our
capital. Turkey even condemned Israel’s 1981 raid on Saddam Hussein’s
nuclear reactor.

Now, with the AKP in power, relations have deteriorated more
systematically. In August 2008, Turkey broke ranks with the West by
welcoming Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Just before the outbreak of the Gaza
war, Erdogan became angry at what he felt was his shabby treatment
by Ehud Olmert while Turkey was mediating between Jerusalem and
Damascus – a factor in his vituperative outbursts against Israel
during the conflict.

OTTOMAN Turkey sought to hold on to its empire by using pan-Islam to
legitimize its rule over the Arabs. But Mustafa Kemal Ataturk founded
modern Turkey as Western-oriented, secular and nationalist. Islam was
disestablished. The Turkish army performed a watchdog functi aelis knew
that no matter what abuse Turkish politicians might heap on Israel,
our two militaries continued to cooperate at the strategic level. Is
that, too, now over?

Turkey is an irreplaceable ally. Israelis want our two countries to
enjoy cordial relations despite everything that’s happened. The onus
is now on Ankara to make plain that it, too, wants the relationship to
continue. It would thereby also be signaling that Turkey wants to be
a bridge between Islam and the West – instead of yet another barrier.

RA-Turkey Protocols Will Be Signed On October 10, 8:00 P.M. Yerevan

RA-TURKEY PROTOCOLS WILL BE SIGNED ON OCTOBER 10, 8:00 P.M. YEREVAN TIME

PanARMENIAN.Net
10.10.2009 15:00 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The signing ceremony of RA-Turkish rapprochement
Protocols initialed on August 31, will take place today, on October 10,
in Zurich University at 8:00-9:00 p.m. Yerevan time. The ceremony will
take an hour. As PanARMENIAN.Net correspondent reported from Zurich,

following RA and Turkey Foreign Ministers’, Edward Nalbandian’s and
Ahmet Davutoglu’s document signing, meeting participants will be
given 3 minutes to deliver statements.

In accordance with regulations, RA President Serzh Sargsyan will
address a statement on RA-Turkish Protocols’ conclusion to Armenian
people.

The ceremony will take place in presence of Swiss Foreign Minister
Micheline Calmy-Rey, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, French
Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey
Lavrov, EU Foreign Policy Chief Javier Solana, Armenia’s Ambassador
to Switzerland Charles Aznavour and Turkey’s Ambassador to Switzerland
Oguz Demiralp.

Political Prisoner Tigran Arakelyan Released

POLITICAL PRISONER TIGRAN ARAKELYAN RELEASED

Tert.am
11:43 09.10.09

Yesterday, at around 6 pm, political prisoner Tigran Arakelyan was
set free from the prison hospital.

The Republic of Armenia General Prosecutor, upon reviewing Arakelyan’s
criminal case, taking into account that the fundamental investigation
has already been carried out and releasing Arakelyan will not hinder
the future investigation process, as well as the diagnosis by the
Republic of Armenia Ministry of Health’s chief opthalmologist which
states that the accused is beginning to show signs of optic nerve
subatrophy, has given instructions to change the precautionary measure
towards Arakelyan (keeping him in custody) to a signed oath not to
flee from the country.

Over the past few weeks, numerous activists and supporters had been
demanding Arakelyan’s release, warning about his deteriorating health.

Upon his release, he was greeted by friends holding banners and
applauding. While briefly speaking with journalists, Arakelyan
said that his vision was impaired, and in fact, the injury was
apparent. Continuing, he said that serious treatment was needed. One
could also see that Arakelyan was ill overall and was walking with
some difficulty.

As for his release, Arakelyan said that, in the end, he didn’t know
why they arrested him and then why they released him from custody.

Arakelyan walked toward the park with Saryan’s monument where he
was greeted by participants of political affairs shouting "Tigran,
Tigran!" (By participants of political affairs, we mean those
individuals who often gather in public spaces in the city for a
particular political cause. These are ongoing, informal gatherings
which began after the events of March 1, 2008.)

Referring to the increase in the severity of charges against him,
Arakelyan said that doesn’t interest him, since he is not guilty and
they have to acquit him.

Arsenal Special: International Break Comes At Wrong Time For Wenger

ARSENAL SPECIAL: INTERNATIONAL BREAK COMES AT WRONG TIME FOR WENGER
Tim Collings

Goal.com
Oct 8, 2009 10:55:45 AM

A constellation of Gunners stars will be going in search of World
Cup rewards.

Arsene Wenger’s star-studded Arsenal squad has this week been scattered
to all four corners of the world.

Twenty players are away on international duty, visiting such far-flung
outposts as Armenia, Azerbaijan, Cameroon, Kazakhstan and Trinidad.

For a manager who has just seen his team reel off six successive
victories in all competitions, scoring 18 goals along the way,
it is hardly ideal preparation for the next domestic assignment:
a home game against Birmingham City on October 17.

No wonder that Arsene Wenger described this international break as
‘badly timed’.

But, in typically philosophical fashion, he took comfort from what
he has seen from his team so far this season.

"What what has impressed me most is the attitude and the spirit,
the quality of our team play and the fact that even when we had
disappointing results, like at Manchester United and Manchester City,
the quality was still there," he said.

"The resolve in the games afterwards was even stronger. So at the
moment it looks good and we are very hopeful for the future."

Needless to say, Wenger hoped also that his 20 men on World Cup and
other international duties return unscathed – such is the competitive
nature of many of the fixtures, it will be no surprise if a few
players return with something worse than mere bruises.

The Arsenal players with perhaps the toughest matches are William
Gallas, Carlos Vela, Andrey Arshavin and Alex Song.

Gallas is not the only Gallic Gunner, of course. With France yet to
seal qualification for next summer’s World Cup finals, he, Gael Clichy,
Abou Diaby and Bacary Sagna face crucial World Cup qualifiers against
the Faroe Islands and Austria.

Vela faces tough World Cup ties for Mexico against El Salvador at
home and Trinidad and Tobago away. A win and a draw for the Mexicans
will see them through to South Africa next summer.

Arshavin, the joker in Wenger’s pack but a serious captain for Russia,
carries the responsibility for fulfilling the dreams of 100 million
compatriots when his national team meet Germany on Saturday in Moscow’s
Luzhniki Stadium.

It is a contest to savor, arguably the outstanding fixture in this
round of qualifying games – and Arshavin is ready for it.

"During our game against England there, I experienced the best
atmosphere in a stadium that I have known in my life," he said. "The
second best was when Zenit beat Rangers in the UEFA Cup final.

"So I think that if we could repeat that feeling in the ground,
then we have a chance to beat them. We have a good team. We have the
experience of the European finals in 2008. And we have players who
know now how to win."

A win would take Russia top of their group and within reach of South
Africa, but the self-effacing Arshavin is not prepared to look any
further ahead than this match. "It is not easy, it is difficult,
but it is the kind of big match we all love to play," he said.

Song is in a similar position, knowing that if his Cameroon team can
contain former Arsenal striker Emmanuel Adebayor of Togo in Yaounde,
they will "have one foot in South Africa".

The equation is simple: if Morocco win in Gabon, victory for Cameroon
against Togo will see them qualify.

"We are playing well and I think we can win," Song said. "But we know
we have to stop ‘Ade’ [Adebayor]… We have the players. In Africa
now, the players are stronger and stronger. We have players who are
in Europe, in England, Italy, France and Germany – they know things
and have good experience from their leagues and the Champions League.

"So, we can go through. But we have to concentrate and it will be
difficult. And, of course, if we do go through we have a chance to
win. It is a big challenge, but this World Cup will be played in South
Africa, on African soil, and there is no reason why an African team
cannot win it. Yes, we can do it, I say."

It is a sentiment that many at Arsenal will share, bu ll come home
happy.