Asbarez: Over $200,000 Raised for Lebanon Armenians at Event Organized by ACF

A capacity crowd heeded the ARF Western U.S. Central Committee’s call and helped raised over $200,000 for Lebanese-Armenian relief efforts

Heeding the call from the Armenian Revolutionary Federation Western U.S. Central Committee, the Armenian Cultural Foundation’s Lebanon-Armenian Relief Committee organized a fund-raising event on Thursday at the courtyard of the St. Gregory the Illuminator Armenian Catholic Church, where a capacity crowd came together to raise more than $200,000 in assistance for our sisters and brothers in Lebanon.

As has been the case during all national crisis, the Western U.S. Armenian community members and benefactors, joined by the Western Region ARF chapters, which, on their own had organized similar events, and staying true to the “One Nation, One Future” motto, once again, rose to the occasion.

Opposition I Have the Honor faction MPs refuse cash bonuses awarded on 30th anniversary of Armenia’s independence

Panorama, Armenia
Sept 17 2021

MPs from the opposition I Have the Honor faction in the Armenian parliament have decided to refuse the one-time cash bonuses awarded to lawmakers on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of Armenia’s independence.

“Today we were informed that on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of independence of the Republic of Armenia, all Armenian MPs have been awarded a one-time cash bonus,” it said in a statement on Friday.

In this regard, the bloc highlighted that there are many social problems in the country that need to be addressed.

“As a result of last year’s war in Artsakh, thousands of Armenians were killed, many of whom were the only breadwinners of their families, thousands of war participants still require quality medical care, tens of thousands of displaced persons, lacking permanent housing and stable income, rely on state support and social assistance from other sources, as well as there are numerous other social issues that require urgent solutions.

“Taking all this into account, the MPs from the I Have the Honor faction cannot be among the deputies, who continue to get bonuses and live a normal life, as if nothing has happened.

"The I Have the Honor faction announces that the awarded cash bonuses will be used to solve those social problems,” reads the statement.

Russian deputy FM, ICRC President discuss NK humanitarian problems

Save

Share

 11:41,

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 15, ARMENPRESS. Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia Sergey Vershinin and President of the International Committee of Red Cross (ICRC) Peter Maurer held a meeting in Geneva on September 14, the Russian foreign ministry reports.

“The detailed discussion of the current humanitarian agenda in Afghanistan, Syria, Nagorno Karabakh and other regions continued during the meeting. In this context the practical aspects of strengthening the partnership between Russia and the ICRC have been considered”, the ministry’s statement says.

 

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Armenian Speaker of Parliament receives Dutch Ambassador

Save

Share

 16:59,

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 16, ARMENPRESS. On September 16, Speaker of Parliament of Armenia Alen Simonyan received Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Netherlands to Armenia Nicolas Schermers, the Parliament told Armenpress.

Nicolas Schermers is the first resident Ambassador of the Netherlands to the Republic of Armenia.

Welcoming the guest, Alen Simonyan noted that he had an effective meeting with the President of the Senate of the Kingdom of the Netherlands Jan Anthonie Bruijn within the framework of the Fifth World Conference of Speakers of Parliaments recently held and invited him to pay an official visit to Armenia.

Presenting some details from the meeting, Alen Simonyan thanked the Ambassador for the substantive position of the Netherlands towards our region and for supporting democratic priorities of Armenia.

The Speaker has referred to the scope of issues, where Armenia expects political support from its partners. Those are the establishment of peace in our region, the urgent implementation of the repatriation of Armenian prisoners of war and civilians, and the effective implementation of the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement. He has underlined the destructive position of the Azerbaijani delegations at different parliamentary assemblies, emphasizing that their rhetoric is not aimed at establishing peace in the region.

Thanking the Parliament Speaker for the reception, the Ambassador reaffirmed the readiness to support the activities of the Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group in the region.

The sides touched upon the development of the inter-parliamentary relations and the need to develop a roadmap promoting the further deepening of the cooperation.

US Ambassador comments on the Ombudsman’s report on tortures of Armenian prisoners in Azerbaijan

Panorama, Armenia
Sept 11 2021

"We call on all states, individuals to respect the fundamental human rights," US Ambassador to Armenia Lynn Tracy told reporters in Yerevan on Saturday. The Ambassador's remarks came at a request to comment on the latest report released by the Human Rights Defender of Armenia which covers the tortures and cases of degrading treatment of Armenian prisoners and civilian captives held in Azerbaijan.  

The Ambassador said they were closely following the reports of the Ombudsman and those from other sources. "We will continue following and cooperating with all sides to ensure the protection and respect of the human rights by all sides," added Ambassador Tracy. 

To remind, the Human Rights Defender of Armenia published on September 8 an Ad Hoc Report on the responsibility of Azerbaijan concerning the inhuman treatment and torture of Armenian captives.

The document covered evidences of cruel treatment, torture, and humiliation of Armenian prisoners of war and civilians, and the mechanisms of responsibility of Azerbaijan for the committed war crimes.

The Ad Hoc Report also presents the gross violations that occurred in Kovsakan on October 20, 2020 (tying Armenian servicemen to a car and dragging them, cutting off the killed people's ears, etc.).


Life in Karabakh normalizes thanks to Russian peacekeepers — Armenian top diplomat

TASS, Russia
Aug 31 2021
"Russia played a key role in curbing Azerbaijan’s aggression against the people of Nagorno-Karabakh," Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan noted

MOSCOW, August 31. /TASS/. The deployment of Russian peacekeepers in Nagorno-Karabakh creates conditions for the restoration of normal life in this region, visiting Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan said on Tuesday after talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

"Russia played a key role in curbing Azerbaijan’s aggression against the people of Nagorno-Karabakh. The deployment of Russian peacekeeping forces in Artsakh (unrecognized Nagorno-Karabakh republic – TASS) as a factor of preventing Baku’s provocations and a factor ensuring the security of the people of Nagorno-Karabakh creates conditions for the restoration of normal life," he said.

Renewed clashes between Azerbaijan and Armenia erupted on September 27, 2020, with intense battles raging in the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh. On November 9, 2020, Russian President Vladimir Putin, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan signed a joint statement on a complete ceasefire in Nagorno-Karabakh. Under the document, the Azerbaijani and Armenian sides stopped at the positions that they had held and Russian peacekeepers were deployed along the engagement line in Nagorno-Karabakh and along the Lachin corridor that connects Armenia with the enclave to exercise control of the ceasefire observance. Apart from that, a number of districts came over to Baku’s control.

The situation at the Armenian-Azerbaijani border has been tense since May 12, when Armenia’s defense ministry said that Azerbaijani armed forces had tried to carry out "certain works" in a border area in Syunik Province in a bid to "adjust the border." Since then, the sides have been reporting border incidents from time to time.

The war unleashed against Artsakh triggered a new round of challenging developments – Serzh Sargsyan

Panorama, Armenia
Sept 2 2021

Former President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan has issued a message on the Artsakh Republic Day, marked on September 2. In his message, Sargsyan notes that thirty years ago, the document on the proclamation of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic was adopted at the joint session of the NK central and Shahumyan regional councils in Stepanakert, which was the first important step on the way to ensuring the survival of the Artsakh-based Armenians in their historic homeland. Months later, that document was followed by the referendum on reinstating Nagorno-Karabakh’s independence.

"The Artsakh-based Armenians’ decision to take the once illegally annexed Autonomous Region of Nagorno-Karabakh out of Azerbaijan as the latter advocated and fostered Armenophobia was based on bitter lessons of history. None of us had forgotten that in 1921 another part of Armenia, Nakhichevan, was handed over to Azerbaijan in the same illegal manner resulting in pogroms, planned displacement and resettlement of Armenians in the Armenian-populated settlements of Azerbaijan and destruction of millenia-old Armenian monuments," said Sargsyan. He recalls that the same sad fate of Nakhichevan, which had been purged of Armenians, would befell Artsakh, if we failed to form self-defense units, and later on the Artsakh Defense Army, dealt a heavy blow on the invaders and threw them out of our homeland. A remarkable state-building campaign was initiated in Artsakh, which rapidly developed with the support of all Armenians.

"The war unleashed against Artsakh in 2020 and the November 9 document stealthily signed by the Capitulator who still holds the office of Prime Minister in Armenia, triggered a new round of challenging developments in Artsakh and Armenia, the consequences of which we feel every day in our border settlements. The incumbent authorities which keep promising that we may enjoy peace and will benefit from unblocked regional infrastructures, sustainable and safe development, are meant to weaken our people’s vigilance, to sow fear and distrust in our strength and eventually undermine the safety of the two Armenian states. In the meantime, Azerbaijan’s President confessed on several occasions that he was being “urged behind closed doors to recognize Nagorno-Karabakh’s independence,” the message said. 

In Sargsyan's words, they waged a challenging but victorious war in the 1990s. "I can insist today that at that time we managed to have the upper hand in a protracted, heavy and unequal war. Some say that Azerbaijan boasted more money, weaponry, ammunition and troops. That is right, but for me, the war was unequal because the strong fought against the weak, and we were strong. The freedom-lovers fought against the invaders, and we were freedom-lovers; the righteous fought against the unjust, and we were the embodiment of justice. We won because we believed in sanctity of our land and family. Similarly, we would have won the 44-day war, if the incumbent authorities had not squeezed our fighting spirit, ousted our best field commanders, mismanaged the war, failed to give vain promises of an imminent victory. As a result, part of our homeland was surrendered to the enemy, several thousands of our troops were killed and hundreds of Armenian prisoners of war were left unattended," added the former president. 

"Thirty years ago, Artsakh made a historical decision, and its status is to live safely outside of Azerbaijan, which is the legitimate right of the Artsakh-based Armenians. Any talks on the status of Artsakh should seek to enshrine that fundamental right, to achieve legal and historical justice, and bearing in mind the events of not so distant past, to prevent Artsakh from being purged of Armenian. All this will come true, if we have a strong army, highly professional diplomats and a strong faith in national values, if we keep working hard, if we glorify our heroes and victories and hold firm to our national values," according to the message.

Armenia will respect the choice of people of Afghanistan, FM says

Save

Share

 17:41,

YEREVAN, AUGUST 31, ARMENPRESS. Armenia follows the developments taking place in Afghanistan, Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan said during a joint press conference with his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov in Moscow.

“We follow the developments in Afghanistan. We support peace in the region and will welcome and respect the choice of the people of Afghanistan”, the FM said.

He stated that Armenia as a member of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) would like to see peace and calmness along the entire perimeter of the organization, including in Afghanistan.

“Armenia will also make efforts for developing a united position ahead of the upcoming summit [CSTO summit in September]”, the FM said.

 

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Armenian minister, US Ambassador discuss opportunities of boosting cooperation in defense field

Save

Share

 17:26,

YEREVAN, AUGUST 30, ARMENPRESS. Defense Minister Arshak Karapetyan received today the delegation led by US Ambassador to Armenia Lynne Tracy, the ministry told Armenpress.

The defense minister introduced the US Ambassador on the current situation in Armenia’s borders, stating that the Azerbaijani side is regularly taking provocative actions. Arshak Karapetyan reaffirmed the readiness of the Armenian side to solve the issues with peaceful means, at the same time highlighting the determination to protect the borders and territorial inviolability of Armenia.

The opportunities of giving new impetus to the Armenian-American cooperation in the defense field were also discussed.

The sides expressed readiness to continue the productive cooperation in areas of mutual interest.

 

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Moscow’s Karabakh puzzle

Vestnik Kavkaza
Aug 25 2021
<div><img src=”"https://mc.yandex.ru/watch/14749042" st1yle="position:absolute; left:-9999px;" alt="" /></div>

25 Aug in 11:40 Mikhail Belyaev, exclusively for Vestnik Kavkaza

The anniversary of the 44-day Second Karabakh War that became victorious for  Azerbaijan, is approaching: three-quarters of the region returned to Baku, and a Russian peacekeeping contingent was deployed on the rest of the territory, where ethnic Armenians compactly live. However, the situation is far from being completely stabilized. According to some observers, there is a risk of a new military escalation – in recent months, shootings have become more frequent, both on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border and directly in Karabakh, regularly resulting in casualties on both sides. In this article, we will analyze Baku and Yerevan’s positions, the main obstacles to sustainable peace and assess the prospects for achieving it.

What Baku managed to squeeze out of its victory

Victorious Azerbaijan is systematically promoting the implementation of the trilateral agreement of November 9, 2020. (Speaking about the fulfilment by the parties of the agreement provisions, we also mean the "war of interpretations", which the parties permanently wage among themselves). Let us briefly list the goals that Azerbaijan has been able to achieve since November 10, 2020. The main achievement is the bloodless transfer of the Lachin (with the exception of the 5-kilometer Lachin corridor), Kelbajar and Aghdam regions to Azerbaijan. With the exception of a two-week hitch during the return of the Kelbajar region, when the Armenian side, through the mediation of Moscow, requested additional time (as it turned out, to burn property and cut down forests), the process went without delays and serious incidents. The Armenian armed forces were also withdrawn from the border areas of the Gubadly and Zangilan regions that were under Armenian occupation at the time of the signing of the trilateral agreement. This is rarely mentioned, but the trilateral document says nothing about these territories, and Armenia had to withdraw its troops from there under the military pressure of Azerbaijan.

Inaccurate maps and Armenian servicemen left in Azerbaijan

Another Baku’s goal – to receive maps of minefields from Yerevan – was achieved only partially, in exchange for a certain number of Armenian soldiers who were in Azerbaijani prisons. However, according to Ilham Aliyev, the accuracy of the transferred maps is only 25%. Therefore, the issue of the Armenian servicemen remaining in Azerbaijan and being considered saboteurs was removed from the agenda. Yerevan, which did not justify American and Russian guarantees regarding the fidelity of the maps, seems to have accepted the failure of the negotiations on the fate of its servicemen. Thus, the Armenian authorities have not yet brought up this issue neither at home nor in the international arena.

Transport corridor as a bone of contention

Yet, Azerbaijan has failed to achieve the opening of the Zangezur corridor. There are two main reasons why Azerbaijan and Armenia cannot come to understanding on this issue.

The first problem is the corridor’s extraterritoriality. In accordance with the trilateral agreement, control over transport communications between ‘mainland’ Azerbaijan and Nakhchivan should be provided by the border troops of the Russian FSB. Clause 9 of the agreement reads: "All economic and transport links in the region are unblocked. Armenia guarantees the safety of transport links between the western regions of Azerbaijan and the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic in order to organize the unimpeded movement of citizens, vehicles and goods in both directions. The Russian Federal Border Service secures transportation. By agreement of the Parties, the construction of new transport communications (highlighted by the author) will be provided, linking the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic with the western regions of Azerbaijan. " Baku evaluates these words as a strong argument in favour of the fact that transport links with Nakhchivan will have an extraterritorial status of a corridor. After all, if the Lachin corridor functions under similar agreed conditions and Armenians freely travel to Karabakh, then there must also be a Zangezur corridor, through which Azerbaijanis could freely reach Nakhchivan. The only difference is that in one case, control is exercised by Russian peacekeepers in Karabakh, and in the other – by the FSB border troops on the territory of Armenia. But Yerevan denies any "corridor logic", insisting that nothing is written directly in the agreement about the creation of a "corridor". Recently, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has reaffirmed this stance.

The second issue is the type of transport communications. Baku insists on both railway and road connection with Nakhchivan. Ilham Aliyev underlines the necessity of the road connection, while Yerevan insists only on the railway connection. Indeed, the trilateral agreement underscores the construction of new transport communications – precisely not one, but many and new ones. The railway communication between the mainland of Azerbaijan and Nakhchivan operated in Soviet times, and therefore this line cannot be called the new one. Azerbaijan refers to this fact, demanding the construction of a highway through Armenia to its exclave.

Failed withdrawal of troops from Karabakh

Another bone of contention is the issue of the presence of the Armenian military on the territory of the deployment of the Russian peacekeeping contingent. According to the 4th clause of the trilateral agreement, "the peacekeeping contingent of the Russian Federation is deployed simultaneously with the withdrawal of the Armenian armed forces. The duration of the stay of the peacekeeping contingent of the Russian Federation is 5 years with automatic extension for next 5-year periods if none of the Parties declares the intent to terminate the application of this provision 6 months before its expiration.” In fact, the withdrawal of Armenian troops from the peacekeepers' deployment zone has never happened. Moreover, according to the Bulletin of the Russian Ministry of Defence of July 14, "On July 13, from 20.27 to 20.53, indiscriminate shooting was observed between the units of the armed forces of Azerbaijan and Armenia in the north-west area near the city of Shusha."

This was immediately noticed in Baku. Later,  the peacekeepers changed the wording to "armed formations of Nagorno-Karabakh," provoking even greater irritation among the Azerbaijanis, who perceived such an interpretation as an allusion to the subjectivity of the separatist regime. Baku recalls that the trilateral statement refers to the "withdrawal of Armenian troops", regardless of whether these troops are the regular army of the Republic of Armenia or military formations from among the local Armenians. Thus, this situation provokes mistrust of the Azerbaijani side to the activities of the peacekeepers.

The status issue

Over the past 10 months after the war, Pashinyan has achieved a lot: he was able to win parliamentary elections, consolidate power and neutralize the threat of a military coup. The early parliamentary elections process gave Armenia a certain respite from the Azerbaijani diplomatic (but not military) pressure. Now that Pashinyan has strengthened his position as prime minister, Yerevan is putting forward the following thesis: "The conflict is not over, negotiations on the status of Karabakh should be conducted within the framework of the OSCE Minsk Group." Ilham Aliyev, in turn, declares that the conflict is over, the status issue is resolved, and the OSCE Minsk Group can deal with humanitarian issues, for example, raising confidence-building measures and other issues of secondary importance from the point of view of real politics. The OSCE Minsk Group itself (represented by the co-chairs of France and the United States) is clearly unhappy with this formulation of the issue and wants to deal with the status of Karabakh. Russia,  the third co-chair, is taking a wait-and-see approach and proposing “not to fuss about the status” at least at this stage.

The issue of border delimitation became a problem for Pashinyan. While the prime minister was busy with domestic politics and elections, the Azerbaijanis occupied all the strategic heights on the border, putting the Armenian authorities in an uncomfortable position as they forgot to send their soldiers to guard the borders.  Baku is likely to increase pressure on Yerevan on this issue, pushing it to start the process of mutual recognition of borders, and, therefore, recognition of Karabakh as part of Azerbaijan.

Prospects for solving problems

In recent weeks, there has been a clear tightening of rhetoric on the part of official Baku on issues that cannot be resolved: on the withdrawal of Armenian troops from the territory of the temporary responsibility of the Russian Ministry of Defense and on the creation of the Zangezur corridor. The Ministry of Defense of Azerbaijan, the Foreign Ministry, and President Aliyev himself, declared the inadmissibility of the Armenian Armed Forces transfer to Karabakh through the Lachin corridor.

At the same time, Baku does not hide its concern about Armenia's intentions to restore the army at the expense of military supplies from Russia. According to the Azerbaijani authorities, such a development will contribute to the toughening of Yerevan's position in the negotiations with Baku and block the achievement of a peace treaty, the path to which lies through the mutual recognition of the territorial integrity. If Armenia prioritizes the issue of the status of Karabakh as a precondition (read, the independence of the separatist entity existing within the responsibility area of the Russian Ministry of Defense), peace in the region will not be achieved.

In planning their actions in the Karabakh direction, both Azerbaijan and Armenia are looking forward for the next five years. In less than five years, the question of extending the mission of the Russian peacekeeping contingent in Karabakh will arise. During this period, Yerevan will try to restore and reform, taking into account the lessons of last year's war, its defeated army in order to have at least some aces in negotiations with military superior Azerbaijan.

Perhaps Russia will help Armenia in this striving, trying to restrain the strengthening of the Turkish positions in the region.

Baku also is not going to sit idly by. According to the leaked information, there are new large-scale Azerbaijani-Israeli agreements on military supplies. There are also reports about regular flights of military transport staff from Israel to Azerbaijan. In the worst-case scenario, the next five years the region will see an arms race, an outbreak of violence on the border and in Karabakh and intense diplomatic and information war amid the risk of an actual military conflict by 2025. If Baku does not get the Zangezur corridor, it is likely that the issue of the further functioning of the Lachin corridor will arise squarely. From a geopolitical point of view (especially if Moscow makes a decision to re-equip the Armenian army), Russia risks of pushing Azerbaijanis towards even greater integration with Turkey.

But there is also a more optimistic scenario, according to which Azerbaijan is provided with an extraterritorial Zangezur corridor that will operate, as stipulated in the trilateral agreement, under Russian control. Thus, all the guarantees that Baku gave on the functioning of the Lachin corridor will automatically remain in force. By ensuring the disarmament of Armenian militants in Karabakh, the Russians will become the only military force in the area of its responsibility in the region, tying Armenia even more closely to itself. Thus, Moscow will secure Baku’s favour on the issue of extending the Russian mission in Karabakh, and the risks of a new war in the region will be levelled. The question is which path Moscow will choose – turning the South Caucasus into a zone of economic cooperation and predictability, or preserving it as a region of chronic conflicts and instability to use it in its own interests and sell arms to both sides.