USCIRF Concerned by Azerbaijan Religion Law Amendments, Condition of Ghazanchetsots Cathedral


 

Washington, DC – The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) is concerned that proposed amendments to Azerbaijan’s law “On Freedom of Religious Beliefs” would fail to address issues in the existing law, which USCIRF Commissioners raised in a delegation to the country last year. The amendments would also enact additional restrictions on religious communities.

“We are disappointed to see Azerbaijan introduce new restrictions that will only serve to further circumscribe the space for the free exercise of freedom of religion or belief. We urge the Azerbaijani government to reconsider these amendments in light of its commitments to human rights,” said USCIRF Chair Anurima Bhargava. “USCIRF encourages Azerbaijan, as a participating state in the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, to request a legal review of its proposed changes from the OSCE Office of Democratic Institutions and Human Rights.”

 The amendments would introduce new, bureaucratic limitations, including restrictions on religious leaders and on the ability of religious communities to operate in the absence of a religious leader. The amendments would also require religious communities form a “religious center” to perform certain functions. At the same time, the amendments would not change current, already restrictive provisions that require official registration, limit registration to those communities that have at least 50 members, mandate state approval of all religious literature, and prohibit foreign citizens from conducting religious ceremonies.

Earlier this month, Azerbaijan’s parliament reportedly approved the amendments and submitted them to President Ilham Aliyev for his signature.

“USCIRF is troubled by reports concerning the preservation and integrity of houses of worship and other religious sites—such as the Armenian Apostolic Ghazanchetsots Cathedral in Shusha, which appears to have had its domes removed amid reports of its ‘restoration’ without the input of its congregation,” USCIRF Commissioner Nadine Maenza added. “While the cathedral is certainly in need of repair following the damage it endured as a result of Azerbaijani shelling last fall, it is imperative that it and other sites are properly restored and maintained.”

 In its 2021 Annual Report, USCIRF recommended that the U.S. Department of State place Azerbaijan on its Special Watch List for engaging in or tolerating severe religious freedom violations. In March, USCIRF released a country update on Azerbaijan that described problematic legislation on religion, the continued imprisonment of religious activists, and recent violations committed in the context of renewed conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh.

 ###

The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) is an independent, bipartisan federal government entity established by the U.S. Congress to monitor, analyze, and report on religious freedom abroad. USCIRF makes foreign policy recommendations to the President, the Secretary of State, and Congress intended to deter religious persecution and promote freedom of religion and belief. To interview a Commissioner, please contact USCIRF at

https://www.uscirf.gov/news-room/releases-statements/uscirf-concerned-azerbaijan-religion-law-amendments-condition

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 05/17/2021

                                        Monday, 

Russian, Armenian Defense Chiefs Again Discuss Border Crisis


Armenia - Armenian soldiers take up positions on the border with Azerbaijan, May 
17, 2021.

Defense Minister Vagharshak Harutiunian warned of “unpredictable consequences” 
of Armenia’s border dispute with Azerbaijan when he again discussed it with his 
Russian counterpart Sergei Shoigu on Monday.

The two men spoke by phone for the second time in five days amid a continuing 
standoff between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces deployed on the 
Armenian-Azerbaijani border.

According to the Armenian Defense Ministry, Harutiunian told Shoigu that most of 
the Azerbaijani troops that crossed into Armenia’s border areas last week have 
still not pulled back in breach of an “agreement” brokered by the Russian 
military.

“Vagharshak Harutiunian found the infringements of Armenia’s internationally 
recognized territory inadmissible, emphasizing that further developments of the 
situation could lead to unpredictable consequences,” the ministry said in a 
statement.

Shoigu assured Harutiunian that Moscow “will make all necessary efforts to 
resolve the existing situation peacefully,” added the statement.

The Russian Defense Ministry reported no details of the phone call.

Russian military officials have been involved in Armenian-Azerbaijani talks held 
on the border in recent days. No agreements have been officially announced as a 
result of those talks so far.

Meanwhile, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov seemed to downplay the gravity 
of the border standoff which Yerevan says could reignite the Nagorno-Karabakh 
conflict.

“There have been no gunshots, no clashes there,” Lavrov told reporters in 
Moscow. “They sat down and started calmly talking about how to de-escalation 
that situation. They asked us for assistance and our military officials provided 
such assistance. An agreement was reached.”

“I see no reason to whip up emotions on this issue which is not ordinary but can 
be settled easily,” he said, adding that Moscow is ready to help Armenia and 
Azerbaijan demarcate their border.

Late last week Armenia formally asked the Russian-led Collective Security Treaty 
Organization (CSTO) to help it deal with the Azerbaijani incursions and restore 
its territorial integrity. It also requested separate military aid from Russia, 
citing bilateral defense agreements.



Another Opposition Bloc Formed

        • Satenik Hayrapetian

Armenia - Former President Serzh Sarkissian and former National Security Service 
Director Artur Vanetsian look on as their political parties officially set up an 
electoral alliance at a ceremony outside Yerevan, May15, 2021.

The opposition parties led by former President Serzh Sarkisian and former 
National Security Service (NSS) Director Artur Vanetsian have officially joined 
forces to participate in Armenia’s parliamentary elections scheduled for June 20.

The two men presided at the weekend over the signing of a memorandum on the 
creation of their electoral alliance comprising their Republican (HHK) and 
Fatherland parties. They said the alliance named Pativ Unem (I Have the Honor) 
will strive to oust Armenia’s current government blamed by them for what they 
see as existential threats facing the country after last year’s war with 
Azerbaijan.

“We will remove and hold accountable the capitulators who have discredited and 
humiliated our state and knelt before the enemy and will stop the decline of the 
state,” Sarkisian declared in a speech delivered during the signing ceremony.

“We need to realize that we are faced with a real threat of losing statehood and 
even being wiped out,” Vanetsian said for his part.

The former ruling HHK announced plans to team up with Vanetsian’s Fatherland 
late last month. Both parties were key members of a coalition of opposition 
forces which tried to force Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian to resign over his 
handling of the war.

Vanetsian, 42, was appointed as head of the NSS immediately the 2018 “Velvet 
Revolution” that toppled Sarkisian and brought Pashinian to power. He quickly 
became an influential member of Pashinian’s entourage, overseeing high-profile 
corruption investigations into former government officials and Sarkisian’s 
relatives. He fell out with Pashinian and resigned in September 2019.

“Artur Vanetsian understood the whole real essence of the new jackals, decided 
to stop and urged others to do the same. Alas, they did not listen to him,” said 
Sarkisian.

The ex-president stressed that “there will be no return to the past” if the new 
bloc succeeds in coming to power. He also seemed to admit that the two parties 
alone cannot unseat the current government, saying that regime change requires 
the consolidation of “all healthy forces.”

Former President Robert Kocharian, who handed over power to Sarkisian in 2008, 
leads another bloc comprising two opposition parties. He has said that it will 
be Pashinian’s main election challenger.

Unlike Kocharian, Sarkisian made clear that he will not be seeking to become 
prime minister or hold any other government post as a result of the upcoming 
elections.

“The reason is very simple: I believe that I have finished my service to Armenia 
and the Armenian people in high-level state positions,” he said.

Accordingly, Vanetsian will top the list of Pativ Unem’s election candidates and 
will be its prime-ministerial candidate.



Armenian-Azeri Border Standoff Continues After Fresh Talks

        • Artak Khulian
        • Gevorg Stamboltsian

Armenia - A view of an area in Armenia's Syunik province where Armenian and 
Azerbaijani troops are locked in a border standoff, May 14, 2021. (Photo by the 
Armenian Human Rights Defender's Office)

Armenian, Azerbaijani and Russian military officials announced no agreements 
after holding more talks over the weekend in a bid to end a military standoff at 
disputed sections of Armenia’s border with Azerbaijan.

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian did not comment on their results in his opening 
remarks at a meeting of Armenia’s Security Council held on Monday morning.

“The negotiations will continue on Wednesday,” he said. “The negotiations have 
one theme: Azerbaijani troops must leave Armenian territory.”

The weekend talks took place in Armenia’s southeastern Syunik province where 
Azerbaijani troops reportedly advanced several kilometers into Armenian 
territory early on May 12. The Armenian military alleged similar Azerbaijani 
advances at two other sections of the long border.

Armen Khachatrian, an Armenian pro-government lawmaker representing a Syunik 
constituency, described the talks as “quite productive” but refused to go into 
details.

“The negotiations will continue. There are still issues,” he told RFE/RL’s 
Armenian Service.

Khachatrian confirmed reports that General Rustam Muradov, the commander of 
Russian peacekeeping troops deployed in Nagorno-Karabakh after last year’s 
Armenian-Azerbaijani war, personally participated in the negotiations.

According to Pashinian, the situation on the border remains largely unchanged 
even though some Azerbaijani soldiers have withdrawn from Armenian territory 
since May 14.

“This means that we must continue to activate mechanisms of the Collective 
Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) and continue to work on activating 
Russian-Armenian allied mechanisms,” he said.

Shortly after the Security Council meeting Pashinian wrote on his Facebook page 
that tensions at “some portions” of the Armenian-Azerbaijani frontier have risen 
in the last few hours due to increased “aggressiveness of Azerbaijani forces.” 
He did not elaborate.

Late last week Armenia formally asked both the CSTO and Russia to help it deal 
with the Azerbaijani incursions and restore its territorial integrity. It wants 
the Russian-led military alliance to invoke Article 2 of its founding treaty 
which requires the CSTO to discuss a collective response to grave security 
threats facing member states.


Armenia - Human rights ombudsman Arman Tatoyan talks to Armenian soldiers 
deployed in Syunik province, May 14, 2021. (Photo by the Armenian Human Rights 
Defender's Office)

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Monday that Moscow remains in “constant 
touch” with Yerevan and Baku and is making “energetic efforts to defuse the 
tensions and correct the situation.”

Azerbaijan has denied sending troops across the border and said its forces only 
took up new positions on the Azerbaijani side of the frontier.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev described the Armenian appeal to the CSTO as 
“completely baseless.”

“There have been no armed clashes on the border, the situation is stable and 
negotiations are going on,” Aliyev was reported to say in a phone call with 
President Kasim-Zhomart Tokayev of CSTO member Kazakhstan.

The Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry said, for its part, that Baku and Yerevan 
should resolve the border crisis through “bilateral contacts.”

Pashinian countered, however, that the two South Caucasus states have no 
diplomatic relations and that they had agreed to demarcate and delimit their 
border in a “trilateral format” involving Russia.

The Armenian premier claimed late last week that Baku may be trying to “provoke 
a large-scale military clash” six months after a Russian-brokered ceasefire 
stopped the war in Karabakh. He pointed to large-scale Azerbaijani military 
exercises that began on Sunday.

The border standoff has also prompted serious concern from the United States and 
France, which co-chair the OSCE Minsk Group together with Russia. Both countries 
have urged Azerbaijan to withdraw its troops from Armenia’s border areas.

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le 
Drian appeared to have discussed the border crisis in a phone call on Sunday. 
According to the U.S. State Department, they “spoke about their cooperation as 
OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chair Countries and emphasized the need for a long-term 
political settlement to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.”



Ter-Petrosian Set To Join Parliamentary Race

        • Gayane Saribekian

Armenia - Former President Levon Ter-Petrosian speaks at a congress of his 
Armenian National Congress (HAK) party, Yerevan, .

Former President Levon Ter-Petrosian signaled at the weekend plans to 
participate in the upcoming parliamentary elections despite his failure to form 
an alliance with Armenia’s two other ex-presidents.

Ter-Petrosian’s Armenian National Congress (HAK) party held a congress in 
Yerevan to formulate a position on the elections slated for June 20. HAK 
representatives said the final decision will be made this week by a new party 
board chosen by the delegates.

“If the board decides to participate in the elections … then it’s clear that the 
duty to top the Congress’s electoral list will be imposed on me,” Ter-Petrosian 
said in a speech at the congress.

“It’s going to be difficult but the truth is that the Congress’s presence in the 
[new] parliament is necessary not least for ensuring … that the lantern of 
reason is not extinguished in the atmosphere of widespread cacophony,” he said.

He said the HAK’s key objective is to scuttle Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s 
reelection and at the same time prevent former President Robert Kocharian from 
returning to power.

The HAK did not participate in the last parliamentary elections held in December 
2018 six months after a “velvet revolution” that brought Pashinian to power. It 
had failed to win any parliament seats in the previous polls held in 2017.

Earlier this month Ter-Petrosian publicly called on Kocharian and the other 
former Armenian president, Serzh Sarkisian, to lead together with him a 
broad-based opposition alliance and try to unseat Pashinian. He said they also 
must also pledge not to seek the post of prime minister in the event of their 
bloc’s victory.

Both men turned down the proposal before Ter-Petrosian suggested that the 
political parties led by him and Sarkisian set up an electoral bloc without 
Kocharian’s participation. Sarkisian did not accept that proposal either.

Ter-Petrosian hit out at the fellow ex-presidents in his speech at the HAK 
congress, saying that they are motivated by parochial, rather than national 
interests. The 76-year-old claimed that Kocharian is keen to “take revenge” on 
Pashinian.

Ter-Petrosian’s readiness to join forces with Kocharian and Sarkisian came as a 
surprise given the long history of mutual antagonism between them. For many 
years, he was highly critical of his successors’ policies and track records.

Like other opposition figures, all three ex-presidents blame Pashinian for 
Armenia’s defeat in last year’s war in Nagorno-Karabakh. Ter-Petrosian said on 
Sunday that Kocharian and Sarkisian are also responsible for the war and its 
outcome. He claimed that they opposed compromise solutions to the Karabakh 
conflict during their rule.


Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2021 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 

Death toll in Israel’s strikes on Gaza rises to 35

Save

Share

 10:14,

YEREVAN, MAY 12, ARMENPRESS. The number of people killed by Israeli missile strikes in the Gaza Strip since Monday has risen to 35, TASS reports citing the Al Mamlaka TV channel.

According to the coastal enclave’s health ministry, Israeli strikes killed three Palestinians on Wednesday night. Earlier, 15 people were killed on Tuesday. The overall death toll since Monday stands at 35, including one woman and 12 children.

The number of injured Gaza residents has reached 233.

Israeli missiles struck the coastal enclave in response to rocket launches by Palestinian radicals. The Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades (the military wing of the radical Hamas movement that controls the Gaza Strip) said it had launched over 200 rockets at Israel’s Tel Aviv and Beersheba late on Tuesday and early on Wednesday. Five Israelis are said to have been killed.

An exchange of missile strikes between Israel and Palestinian radicals from the Gaza Strip followed an outburst of unrest near the Al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem’s Old City in early May. More than 700 people have been hurt in riots in recent days. Clashes between the Palestinians and the Israeli police were triggered by an Israeli court ruling to seize dwelling houses in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood from Arab families who have been living there for more than 50 years in favor of Jewish resettlers who had reportedly owned these buildings before 1948. The houses allocated by Jordan as the custodian of Muslim holy sites in Jerusalem are located some 500 meters from Al-Aqsa.

No direct danger posed to Armenian quarter, patriarchate amid Jerusalem clashes

Save

Share

 13:23,

JERUSALEM, MAY 12, ARMENPRESS. Amid the clashes in Jerusalem, the situation in the city’s Armenian quarter and the patriarchate is normal, with no direct dangers, according to the Chancellor of the Armenian Patriarchate of Jerusalem Koryun Baghdasaryan.

“The incidents are far from the Armenian quarter,” Baghdasaryan told ARMENPRESS.

He said the church ceremonies are proceeding as scheduled and nothing has been cancelled. 

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Armenian gravestones in Russia’s Yaroslavl Region vandalized

Public Radio of Armenia
May 8 2021    

Unknown persons vandalised gravestones in the territory of the Armenian cemetery in the village of Kurba in Russia’s Yaroslavl Region. About 50 tombs were damaged.

The Armenian Embassy in Russia has condemned the act of vandalism, describing it as a clearly provocative action and an encroachment on spiritual values.

“It can lead to various consequences, negatively affecting efforts to preserve interethnic harmony,” the Embassy said.

“We are confident that the law enforcement agencies of the Yaroslavl Region will take all the necessary steps to bring the perpetrators to justice as soon as possible,” the Embassy said, adding that such acts should be condemned to prevent recurrence.

Facebook removes dozens of Azerbaijani accounts and pages

Public Radio of Armenia
May 7 2021







Facebook has removed 124 accounts, 15 Pages, six Groups and 30
Instagram accounts from Azerbaijan that targeted primarily Azerbaijan
and to a much lesser extent Armenia.

“We found this network as a result of our internal investigation
following routine enforcement against two third-party Android
applications — Postegro and Nunu, which misled people into giving away
their Instagram credentials,” Facefook said.

“It appears that this activity was separate and unrelated to the same
actors’ coordinated inauthentic behavior. Our CIB investigation found
links to individuals associated with the Defense Ministry of
Azerbaijan,” it added.


 

World food prices hit highest levels in April since 2014

Save

Share

 15:12, 6 May, 2021

YEREVAN, MAY 6, ARMENPRESS. World food commodity prices have risen for the eleventh month in a row, noticeably the price of sugar, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) said on Thursday that the average FAO food price index, which reflects monthly changes in international prices for staple foods, was 120.9 points in April, up 1.7% from March, and 30.8% higher than in 2020, reports TASS.

FAO noted that the index value reached its highest level since May 2014, but in nominal terms, it is still 12% below its all-time high in February 2011.

The sugar price index rose by 3.9% month-on-month due to harvest delays in Brazil and frost damage in France. The organization noted that the index has reached levels that are almost 60% higher than the figures from April 2020.

The organization also said that new forecasts point to an increase in global wheat and corn production in the coming season.





Court in Armenia sentences two Syrian mercenaries to life in prison

Public Radio of Armenia
May 4 2021        


A court of general jurisdiction in Armenia’s Syunik has sentenced the two Syrian mercenaries captured during the Artsakh war to life in prison.

Syrian nationals Yusuf Alaabet al-Hajji and Mehrab Muhammad Al-Shkheir were charged with international terrorism and crimes committed during armed conflict.

Being citizens of the Syrian Arab Republic, they participated in the aggressive war unleashed by the military-political leadership of Azerbaijan against Artsakh on September 27, 2020, during which their actions were aimed at killing or causing serious harm to civilians who were not directly involved in hostilities during the armed conflict in the territory of the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Artsakh.

Charges were brought against the two Syrian nationals under Article 217, Part 3, Clause 1 (terrorism committed by an organized group), Article 389 (international terrorism), Article 390), Part 1, Clause 1(Serious breach of international humanitarian law during armed conflicts, murder), Article 390, Part 3, Clause 1 (assault on civilian population or individual civilians) Article c, Part 3 ((participation of a mercenary in armed conflicts or military actions).

Turkish press: Turkey shares legal grounds to answer ‘genocide’ claims – Turkey News

Turkey's Justice Ministry responded on April 26 to claims regarding the events of 1915 with an infographic containing lies and facts in legal terms on the issue.

On Saturday, U.S. President Joe Biden called the events of 1915 a "genocide," breaking with a long-held tradition of American presidents refraining from using the term.

Answering a series of questions, the infographic started with the definition of genocide, stating that it is a type of crime against the international community, the definition and framework of which is set by law.

It recalled that the crime was first defined at the international level by the 1948 U.N. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

Stressing that Turkey has been a party to the convention since 1950, it said countries also regulated the crime of genocide in their domestic laws per the convention, to which 149 states are parties.

On the crime in Turkey's legislation, the infographic read: "The Turkish Penal Code numbered 5237, which entered into force on June 1, 2005, regulates the crime of genocide in Article 76 and crimes against humanity in Article 77 by the framework set forth in international documents."

It said the statute of limitations would not be applied in those crimes committed after June 1, 2005.

The crime must be committed with a specific intention, it said, defining provisions of the crime, and added that there must be an act of partially or entirely destroying a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group just because of their nature.

"With this motive, acts of destruction such as killing and injuring, directed towards a certain group cause genocide crime," it said.

Answering the question of who decides an act to be genocide, it said undoubtedly, genocide is of interest to various disciplines such as politics, sociology and history.

"However, for an act to constitute a crime of genocide legally, either the jurisdiction of the country where the alleged acts took place or an international judicial mechanism (international criminal courts or International Court of Justice) with jurisdiction must decide on the issue," it said, referring to Article 6 of the 1948 UN Convention.

The accused must be alive for a prosecution to be initiated, it added.

Genocide crimes in world history

Answering the question of whether there are judicial decisions concluded as genocide in world history, it said in 1945, the Nuremberg Court tried Germany's war crimes and crimes against humanity.

It recalled that the court, which technically did not handle genocide, was established with an international status.

"Since 1954, Germany has started to prosecute the perpetrators of the Holocaust with the laws it has enacted," the ministry said, adding that the country lifted the statute of limitations in 1965, paving the way for the application of laws to past events.

"At the international level, the International Criminal Tribunal of the former Yugoslavia was established in 1993 and the Rwanda International Criminal Court in 1994, and crimes against humanity were tried and genocide was determined," it recalled.

The 1998 Rwanda verdict is the first judgment of genocide by an international court in world history, it said, adding that in 2007, the International Court of Justice acknowledged that there was a genocide in Bosnia.

"Therefore, there is a legal basis for calling the events in Germany, Bosnia and Rwanda a 'genocide'," it stressed.

On the question of whether there is an authorized court decision describing the events of 1915 as "genocide," it said there is no judicial decision on this matter and it is not possible principally and formally.

"It is out of the question for a judicial mechanism to take action against the framework laid down in the U.N. Convention and the decisions of the International Court of Justice," it emphasized.

Can European Court of Human Rights judge 1915 events?

In its Perincek v. Switzerland and Mercan and others v. Switzerland judgments, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) stated that it does not have the authority to make binding decisions contrary to the International Criminal Court or the International Court of Justice in the context of the Genocide Convention regarding the events experienced by the Armenians during the Ottoman Empire in 1915 and whether the deportation could be deemed 'genocide' in international law.

"Therefore, any claims based on the 1915 events cannot be put forward before the ECHR," the ministry said.

Answering the question of whether not recognizing the events of 1915 as genocide can be punished, it referred to the above-mentioned ECHR trials and said: "In these cases, the Swiss law, which considers it a crime to deny the Armenian genocide allegations, received a violation decision from the ECHR."

The issue has been evaluated within the scope of freedom of _expression_, it said.

On the question, if there is any legal basis to US President Biden's remarks, it said: "Considering the Genocide Convention, to which our country is also a party, and the ICJ jurisprudence interpreting this agreement, the US president's statements have no legal basis."

It highlighted that the states also have a right not to be tainted, just like individuals.

"The unfounded claims put forward totally with political motives do not mean anything other than the quest to denigrate the glorious history of a nation that has lived with justice and law for centuries."

Turkish stance on 1915 events

Turkey's position on the events of 1915 is that the deaths of Armenians in eastern Anatolia took place when some sided with invading Russians and revolted against Ottoman forces. A subsequent relocation of Armenians resulted in numerous casualties.

Turkey objects to the presentation of these incidents as "genocide," describing them as a tragedy in which both sides suffered casualties.

Ankara has repeatedly proposed the creation of a joint commission of historians from Turkey and Armenia as well as international experts to tackle the issue.

In 2014, Recep Tayyip Erdogan – Turkey's then-prime minister and now president – expressed his condolences to the descendants of Armenians who lost their lives in the events of 1915.

Opinion: Why Biden’s Recognition of the Armenian Genocide Is so Crucial for Making American Lives Matter

Politicus USA
May 2 2021

 


By Tim Libretti
 

A term frequently used to describe Donald Trump’s behavior during his unfortunate and hateful presidency was “unprecedented.”

And it wasn’t meant in a positive way.

Indeed, Trump’s flouting of political norms, his overt racism and sexism and general peddling of hate, his naked abuse of the presidency to enrich himself and his family and to seek vengeance on his political enemies, his incessant lying, attacks on the free press, and more, were behaviors that in their extremity and flagrancy merited the descriptor “unprecedented.”

As I chronicled in periodic pieces in PoliticusUsa over the last four years, Trump’s presidency was, on multiple levels, an ongoing genocidal endeavor, an assault on human life itself. From blatantly enabling Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan in his ethnic cleansing of the Kurdish people in northeast Syria in October 2019, to his caging of children at the border, to his failure to respond to or even acknowledge the coronavirus pandemic while over 500,000 Americans perished, to his racist rhetoric that motivated mass shootings and overall endorsed the view that the lives of people of color simply don’t matter, Trump’s presidency could certainly be characterized as a concerted effort to undermine human life, as a genocidal mission.

Trump’s rush to execute death row prisoners as his term neared its end exemplifies the work of his murderous administration, solidifying his legacy, in the words of Joanna Walters,

writing in The Guardian, “as the most prolific execution president in over 130 years.”

As I’ve documented (here, here, and here), many of Trump’s behaviors and policies certainly fall under the definitional practices of genocide detailed in the United Nation’s 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.

So when President Joseph Biden last week officially declared the Turk’s mass slaughter of Armenians in 1915 during the breakup of the Ottoman Empire an act of genocide, he not only gave a new and positive connotation to the adjective “unprecedented,” he also set an important course for a presidency whose guiding principle appears to be to affirm and support life, not traffic in death and peddle the hate that enables murderous behavior.

For fear of straining relations with the Turkish government, previous presidents have remained silent when it comes to naming the Turkish massacre of 1.5 million Armenians a genocide, including Barack Obama, whose ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power wrote a Pulitzer-prize winning book in 2002 titled A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide, which discusses a length the Armenian genocide.

Biden’s unprecedented declaration, we need to recognize, has as much to do with his domestic agenda of supporting American lives, of ensuring they matter, as it does with his foreign policy and his efforts to restore a basic moral compass to America’s global character.

As Jason Easley wrote in reporting on Biden’s official naming of the Armenian genocide, “Americans could be watching a very special presidency unfolding before our eyes.”

It is important to recognize that the genocidal rhetoric Trump applied to the border between Syria and Turkey, legitimating removal and even extermination of the Kurds in 2019, was really no different from the rhetoric he deployed in his domestic policy regarding the southern border to validate an equally genocidal behavior.

When Trump talked about peoples seeking to immigrate to the U.S. across the southern border, he notoriously referred to them as “criminals” and “racists” and spoke about those “caravans” of

people fleeing mass violence and seeking asylum as “invasions” or “infestations.” He used similar language to talk about communities at home and abroad inhabited by peoples of color, referring to Baltimore as a “rat and rodent infested mess” and Haiti and African nations as “shithole countries.”

This language turns these groups of people, indeed entire nations of people, into problems that need to be “cleaned out.” Just as Trump insisted that “Turkey, in all fairness,” has “had a legitimate problem” on the border with “terrorists” and “a lot of people in there they couldn’t have” such that “they had to have it cleaned out,” he used the same language with regard to people of color in our inner cities, to people of color from the south seeking to enter the U.S. legally, and to people of color in nations abroad.  They all represent “a legitimate problem” needing to be “cleaned out.”

And, of course, even when he didn’t execute policy, he inspired and mobilized his racist army to action, as we saw both in the mass shootings at the Tree of Life synagogue and in El Paso. In both cases the shooters deployed Trump’s language of “invasion” to rationalize the mass killing of Jewish people and Mexicans, respectively.

Biden’s naming of the Armenian genocide signals his willingness to confront history and reality, not just around the world but in the United States, where the nation struggles to address—and redress—its own violent history of racism and genocide.

If the nation is, indeed, to “build back better,” it must confront the genocidal on which it was built.

His appointment of Deb Haaland as the first Native American Secretary of the Interior, among other appointments of people of color and people from other historically marginalized groups to his cabinet and other high-ranking positions, signals this willingness to confront America’s past in seeking to create a humane America that resets its foundation and realizes its principles of justice.

At the Democratic National Convention in 2020, Haaland forthrightly addressed America’s violent history of genocide and colonization. When’s the last time prior to that moment that when genocide was a topic of discussion at a Democratic convention?

Overall, Biden’s calling out genocide signals, we can hope, a presidency that will affirm life over death.

We see this already. While Trump pursue policies that destroyed the environment and pushed more people into poverty, Biden is pursuing policies that move to create an environment that sustains life and to raise wages to livable levels and address human need.

While Trump ignored the pandemic, calling it a hoax, Biden has in fact implemented a nation strategy and is now seeking to help nations around the globe.

While Trump and the Republicans seek to deny transgender people rights, Biden has moved to ensure their civil rights and their access to health care.

We could go on.

But the point is that where Trump’s policies furthered death, Biden has affirmed life in his policies, calling out and challenging genocide in unprecedented ways.

 

 

Tim Libretti

Tim Libretti is a professor of U.S. literature and culture at a state university in Chicago. A long-time progressive voice, he has published many academic and journalistic articles on culture, class, race, gender, and politics, for which he has received awards from the Working Class Studies Association, the International Labor Communications Association, the National Federation of Press Women, and the Illinois Woman’s Press Association.