Armenian sports legend Shavarsh Karapetyan appointed Adviser to the Head of the Republic of Bashkortostan

Public Radio of Armenia

People should change attitude towards coronavirus, paying more attention to older people – PM

Save

Share

 19:38,

YEREVAN, MARCH 18, ARMENPRESS. Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan says it's possible that many people who during this process have been infected with coronavirus, have recovered on their own and do not even know about that, ARMENPRESS reports Pashinyan said in a Facebook Live.

''Analyzing the situation I understand that many citizens get infected and recover without even knowing about it. The health condition of the confirmed cases also tell us about that. Possibly, there are many people who during this period got infected with coronavirus and recovered without knowing that they got sick and recovered'', Pashinyan said, adding that it’s necessary to change the attitude towards coronavirus.

''I think we should change our attitude towards coronavirus, and take it as a disease which is quite dangerous for older people, like the flue. Our main task should be being careful towards our beloved parents and grandparents'', the PM said.

On March 16 Armenia declared a 30-day state of emergency to fight against the spread of the novel coronavirus. The state of emergency is effective until April 14, at 17:00. By now there are 72 confirmed cases of coronavirus in Armenia, one of whom has recovered and been discharged from hospital.

Edited and translated by Tigran Sirekanyan

Armenia PM: I won’t let international organizations say Armenians’ decision is wrong

News.am, Armenia
March 12 2020
Armenia PM: I won't let international organizations say Armenians' decision is wrong Armenia PM: I won't let international organizations say Armenians' decision is wrong

20:50, 12.03.2020
                  

We respect all of our international partners, including European institutions, the organizations of the European Union, Council of Europe, the CIS countries, the Eurasian Economic Union, the Collective Security Treaty Organization, the United Nations and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, but none of these organizations is or can be higher than our people. This is what Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan stated in the speech that he gave during the campaign in Vayk today.

“If our people make their decision, I won’t let any international organization think about saying that our people have made the wrong decision. If the people decide, there is no power in the world that can question or consider that decision since the Armenian people are a triumphant and powerful people, and they will always achieve victories from now on,” the Prime Minister declared.

Armenia PM isolates himself with family in Sevan, to get tested for coronavirus

News.am, Armenia
March 13 2020

23:23, 13.03.2020
                  

Nikol Pashinyan and his family have isolated themselves at their mansion in Sevan. Pashinyan stated that he and his wife will get tested for coronavirus tomorrow.

“We had been worried since yesterday since one of the assistants to the President of Brazil had tested positive for coronavirus, the President has also been tested and is waiting for the response. We learned about this yesterday and decided to isolate ourselves. This evening, on the way to Sevan, we found out that the President of Brazil had tested positive for coronavirus. On March 7, Anna had a meeting with the wife of the President of Brazil, and unfortunately, they hugged each other and took a photo. First, we measured our temperature, but we didn’t have a high temperature. However, later, the news about the President of Brazil testing positive for coronavirus was denied. However, we will remain isolated, and tomorrow morning we will get tested to be sure that everything is fine,” Pashinyan said.

CIVILNET.Q&A with Laurence Broers: On “Rashomon” Approach to Karabakh

CIVILNET.AM

2 March, 2020 14:56

The article was originally published on Focus on Karabakh, a project of the USC Institute of Armenian Studies

Parts of a Circle presented at Chatham House in London Feb. 18, 2020
A documentary film almost a decade in the making brought together Armenian and Azerbaijani experts and journalists to try to tell the story of the Karabakh conflict the way it had not been told before. Emil Sanamyan of the Focus on Karabakh asked the project coordinator Laurence Broers about this unique undertaking. Broers is also the author of a recently published book “Armenia and Azerbaijan. Anatomy of a Rivalry.”

ES: Can you describe your role in this project? 

LB: The film we screened on February 18 at Chatham House follows on from an earlier film trilogy, Parts of a Circle. I was the project’s first manager, setting it up in 2011 and running it until 2014. Together with my colleague Jenny Norton, we played the various roles that a film producer might play. We supported the network of media professionals and experts on the Karabakh conflict to make the films, we convened meetings in Tbilisi at which the teams agreed scripts, watched and discussed each other’s footage and we accompanied the teams on their path to agreement on what should go into the films.

After I left Conciliation Resources to focus on research in 2014 I continued to attend the meetings and to support the completion of the three films in the Parts of a Circle series. Five years later I came back to Conciliation Resources as Caucasus programme director, and took over the management of the fourth and final film, which isn’t a new film as such but draws on the same materials as the original trilogy and presents a single, unified narrative in English. Together with my colleagues Jenny Norton and Jenny Tobias, and in close consultation with the project teams, we were responsible for the script and for bringing the film series to a long overdue close. 

ES: How did this project originate, who funded it and why did it take so long to complete?

LB: The concept for a series of films documenting the Karabakh conflict came from one of Conciliation Resources’ long-term partners, the Media Initiatives Center (MIC) in Yerevan, in 2011. It built on earlier initiatives, such as Dialogue Through Film and the Armenian-Azerbaijani-Turkish documentary Memories Without Borders, that had established a solid set of relationships between media professionals at MIC and Internews Azerbaijan.

The basic idea was to create a film series that would juxtapose two narratives held by each side in a conflict together in one film, in the way that, for example, the Japanese film Rashomon depicts the same incident but from separate, contradictory perspectives. The viewer is thus exposed to the subjectivity of different perspectives, made aware of their own preconceptions, preferences and biases, and invited to triangulate their own understanding of contested or controversial events. The project envisaged the making of three 1-hour-long films over three years: The Road to WarThe War and In Search of Peace.

The project was only made possible by the existence of networks that had built up over many years of partnership. MIC and Internews Azerbaijan were the primary partners, but we also worked with the Stepanakert Press Club and with the Humanitarian Research Public Union in Baku, in addition to individuals well-known for deep expertise in a relevant area, such as Rahman Badalov, Tatul Hakobyan, Shahin Rzayev and Ara Shirinyan. The project was funded by the European Union, through the ‘EPNK’ peacebuilding consortium.

You’re right to highlight that it has taken us what is in fact 9 years to get to this point. There were delays with the completion of the film trilogy, originally scheduled for summer 2015. Some of that was due to the way we had to work: a laborious and time-consuming process of agreeing scripts in Tbilisi, going away to film at home, coming back to Tbilisi some months later, and communicating remotely the rest of the time. It was a quite a large project, with a lot of calendars and moving parts to coordinate.

But the delay was more about the political context in which we were working. Beginning in 2014 there was a crackdown on civil society in Azerbaijan, which led to a number of high-profile trials in 2015. Many NGOs had their bank accounts frozen, including our partners. This raised a lot of issues about how to continue and complete the work – we could hardly expect people to give their time for free. The context also affected the relationships within the project: compared to the halcyon days of Dialogue Through Film in the 2000s, the 2014-16 period tested relationships to the limit. Beyond that, some of the interviewees in the films, such as Arif Yunusov, were arrested, tried and imprisoned. One of them, Afgan Mukhtarli, is still in prison. This attached new significance to the films, and what it might mean to show them in public.     

The trilogy was scheduled to complete in 2015, but was still in post-production in April 2016. The ‘four-day war’ further narrowed the space for the film trilogy to have a public profile, just as they were completed. Nevertheless, our partners implemented a programme of more than 100 screenings of the films in 2017-19, reaching selected audiences of more than 1,500 people. That may not sound like much, but I believe this was still a significant achievement in the aftermath of renewed violence.  

At the same time, we recognised that only the most committed of international audiences beyond the region would engage with a three-hour trilogy on a conflict that unfortunately remains obscure. We came up with the idea of a fourth ‘summary’ film which would draw on the same materials but in a single, unified narrative written for audiences new to the conflict. The project partners decided to call this film Parts of a Circle: History of the Karabakh Conflict, and this is the film that we screened at Chatham House. 

ES: What do you think is the significance of this film?

LB: This film and the Parts of a Circle trilogy are significant on a number of levels.

Firstly, they take a step away from the poisonous information war cultivating the recognition of suffering only on one side and dismissing human losses on the other side as conspiracy or propaganda. In the first two films of the trilogy, where the narrative is dealing with grievous losses on all sides, the alternating story-telling structure exposes the viewer to each side’s interpretation of those events. Each perspective narrates both its own and the other side’s losses. We are sometimes asked whether it’s helpful to bring up history or ‘go over old ground’, with the implication being that this only complicates and inflames the issues. But how can you prepare populations for peace without breaking down one-sided understandings of conflict that deny the other side’s losses and grievances? It’s never too early to deal with the past, but it can easily become too late. We’ve recently seen evidence of how long-standing conspiracy theories can easily become normalised in the Armenian-Azerbaijani context at the highest level, with Ilham Aliyev and Nikol Pashinyan recently repeating such denials in public forums. As their title suggests, these films offer an alternative, more challenging pathway to a unified and complete historical narrative.

Secondly, these films are significant as a bridge between lived and learned experience. The dying out of the last survivors of the Holocaust during the Second World War has brought home to the world the significance of eyewitness testimony in countering denialism. The Karabakh conflict entered its fourth decade in 2018, and some of the interviewees in the Parts of a Circle films who were protagonists in the events of 1988-94, such as Igor Muradyan, have already passed away. These films, and the wider collection of interviews that they have generated, are consequently an educational and research resource that will accumulate in value over time. At the same time there is a younger generation which has had very limited exposure to knowledge about the conflict. South Caucasian history textbooks, for example, are notoriously short on information about the conflicts in the early 1990s. These films offer not only a source of direct information about events that are not well transmitted in Armenian and Azerbaijani societies, but also a perspective on the viewpoints from which that information is perceived.

Thirdly, the films are significant as an example of a cross-conflict initiative that has endured through the most challenging of circumstances. Some of those who saw the trilogy in the region in 2017-18 were surprised that such a project was still possible. Moreover, I think that this initiative demonstrates the value of long-term strategic intervention, building up relationships over time and creating the space for both challenge and consensus. This may contribute more to the peace process than one-off events or journalists’ visits such as the one we saw last year, significant though these may be as precedents. Parts of a Circle was possible because of many years of previous work, creating the reserves of trust that allowed the teams to address some of the most painful episodes in the history of Armenian-Azerbaijani relations on film together.

There’s been no single or typical reaction to the films in the region, but one common observation is that these films counter myths. In a mediascape saturated with stereotypes and myth-making, that’s an important contribution.

ES: When do you expect the film to become available to the public?

LB: We are planning to make the film available on the Conciliation Resources website (www.c-r.org/partsofacircle) in mid-April. We are discussing with the Parts of a Circle network how and when to make the original trilogy available. Several peacebuilding organisations across the region have the films and are using them in their programming. 

Asbarez: It Is Time for The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

March 2, 2020

Mike Mkhitar Moradian

BY MIKE MKHITAR MORADIAN, Ph.D.

In the past few months there were some major developments in the Republic of Armenia that require evaluations. The government of Prime Minister Pashinyan has been successful to slow down the immigration, keep an eye on corruption, and maintain a reasonable hope in the Armenian people both in the Republic and the diaspora.

So, let’s begin with “THE GOOD.” Overall, since no miracle was anticipated, the general affairs in the Republic have remained the same and have not gotten worse, a positive situation compared to the previous regime. A few important and required steps have been taken, most notably, the increase in the minimum wage. A long overdue increase in minimum wage gave the workers in Armenia a partial relief. Although majority of the workers in the country had higher wages than the previous minimum wage this increase made it official that the employers cannot abuse their workers and will have to pay according to the law. Also, a small increase in newborn baby assistance was a positive step and hopefully will not be the last one.

Construction of new roads have also been a positive step, despite the fact that some may argue that the construction of new roads is the government’s responsibility. In that sense, prime minister Pashinyan’s government has been responsible. Lastly, the reduction in apparent corruption, which was widespread in the former government’s time, is admirable. We all know that rooting out corruption is a long term process and cannot happen overnight. Fortunately, the Armenian government has been able to create an environment in the country that has been discouraging to the corrupt officials, maintaining hope that the country is on the right track to minimize corruption.

Well, not all has been good, there has also been “THE BAD.” Prime minister Pashinyan promised us during the velvet revolution that there will be national unity such that the national values and the will of the Armenian people will guide the government’s policy. However, some recent actions by his cabinet members have broken that promise. Let’s begin with the education minister’s order to remove the requirement for certain courses in the higher educational institutions to be taught in Armenian. Regardless of what the education minister’s intents were, this move was wrong. In a time that our national values and culture, including the Armenian language, has to be given the utmost attention we cannot afford any move to weaken them.

We, in Glendale, have worked hard to create an Armenian flag program, which is supported by the Glendale Unified School District (GUSD). Learning the regular school subjects such as math, science, social studies, and others are neither required nor enforced in America, yet a local government in a small city in the United States is providing it for its citizens. It is absurd to see the education minister of the Republic of Armenia work diligently to remove the Armenian language requirement from the higher education curriculum. Any attempt to weaken and discredit the Armenian language in any shape or form is wrong and bad for the Republic and the Armenians in the diaspora. It is against preserving and strengthening the national values and unity.

The second bad decision that was recently made by the health minister of PM Pashinyan’s government was to close labor and delivery/childbirth units in some villages, especially the one in the border village of Achajour (Աչաջուր) in Tavoosh. The brave people of Achajour, who live under Azerbaijan’s direct fire, did not deserve to see that the only labor and delivery/childbirth unit in their village, that also served the neighboring villages, to be closed. The health minister’s reason for closing their labor and delivery unit was citing its substandard conditions, which seems to be a very logical reason for a government official who lives in Yerevan. But to me, as a healthcare executive and strategist, is short-cited and childish (and I suffice with these two words). The health minister needs to learn that strategies are not planned in offices, they are planned in Gemba, the Japanese word for “the actual place,” this is a Lean term for implementing continuous improvements.

Citing lack of European standards for a labor and delivery unit in a border village in Armenia is not only absurd but is also dangerous. We all know that this unit does not meet the international standards, that is no news, what we need to do is to bring it up to those standards. Providing the best childbirth center for a border village is the correct strategy, not closing it. There is often exchange of fire between Azeris and Armenian forces in Achajour, the Azeri forces also shoot at the boarder villages, especially at nights. The sound of a single gunshot can trigger any pregnant women to go into labor who now has to wait hours to be transferred to a much farther childbirth center to have her child. I recommend that the health minister reverses his decision and start a project to upgrade the childbirth center in Achajour with advanced equipment and proper staffing. This is not just a healthcare decision it impacts national security as well.

Now let’s talk about “THE UGLY.” Recently different elements in the government and national assembly have increased their criticism of patriotism and nationalism in the country. Most notably, the relentless attacks on the Armenian Revolutionary Federation and its members, who have been a symbol of patriotism and nationalism for over a century. A month or so ago the ARF youth organizations requested the resignation of the education minister for his unpatriotic decisions.

Prime minister Pashinyan went to the national assembly and expressed his discontent with that move. I watched his presentation on the TV, and to my surprise, he made some bold comments about the ARF without actually naming it. Prime minister Pashinyan said if this party wants to have a future in the country, they should stop acting like this, which means stop criticizing my government. I am forced to say that the future of the political parties in a given democratic country is decided by the people. Democratically elected leaders don’t decide the future of the other political parties, the dictators do.

Prime minister also gave an example, which included a chu-chu train to take that political party away. Here, too, I am forced to remind him, since he forgets, that with the exception of the ARF, tens of different political parties have been created in Armenia (some overnight) and have disappeared almost as fast as they were created, like spring flowers. Also, whenever the ARF criticizes the government’s inappropriate moves the prime minister quickly reminds all that the ARF was collaborating with the previous corrupt regime to cast a shadow on their criticisms. Ironically, the prime minister was an acquaintance to the leader of the first corrupt regime in Armenia, namely Levon Ter-Petrosian. I suggest that the prime minister finds another argument since this one is getting old.

The ARF has a new leadership and a new set of principles and policies in Armenia. The prime minister’s attempts to discredit the ARF in Armenia has created a dangerous environment such that many ARF members in the government have been fired from their jobs with no reason or have been forced to quit. This systematic attempt to weaken the ARF ranks through putting economic pressure on its members is pathetic and a remnant of the previous regimes. It is a shame to do the same while the prime minister takes pride in being different from his predecessors. Another example is when a national assembly member allowed himself to call the ARF, an assassin group. Armenians don’t call the ARF assassins, the Turks do. On the contrary, the Armenians see the ARF as the most organized, influential, and patriotic party.

Also, some government officials in Armenia have tried to show that the ARF in Armenia is different than the ARF in the other parts of the world such as the Western US, a divide and conquer attempt. This ridiculous idea cannot be taken seriously by anyone. The very existence of the ARF is predicated upon its worldwide unity, please read the history of the ARF. In fact, just a few weeks ago the leader of the supreme council of the ARF in Armenia was warmly welcomed by hundreds of party members in the Western US, showing their unconditional support for the party’s new leadership. Therefore, the Armenian government has to stop weakening patriotism and nationalism in the country and limit promoting neoliberal ideologies. In a country sandwiched between two vicious enemies, landlocked, and with limited resources only patriotic and nationalistic ideologies should be promoted.

The Armenian people are patriotic and have proved it several times in the last century, it is the moral and ethical duty of the government to choose the best ways to guarantee the national security of the country. The ARF has been an undisputed champion of patriotism and nationalistic ideologies and its members have sworn to serve the Armenian people and the country. I urge the prime minister to restrict the unpatriotic rhetoric and actions and to find ways to create the national unity. An all-inclusive, patriotic, and thoughtful approach will not only strengthen Armenia’s statehood, it will also prepare a new generation of young Armenians who will guarantee the future of the country.

Exploring links between Armenia, Allen County

THE IOLA REGISTER
March 6 2020

By TREVOR HOAG

Allen County was host to a unique group of international young people Thursday.

They were visiting from the Republic of Armenia, a landlocked country in the mountainous Caucasus region once part of the Soviet Union.

Although the Armenian group hailed from the other side of the globe, two things were quickly apparent. First, the challenges facing their small country had much in common with those facing rural Kansas. And second, the same goes for the solutions.

Armenia has seen a great deal of upheaval in recent years, from social and political uprisings within the county to a steady “brain drain,” where qualified young people depart their home country in search of better opportunities in western Europe.

Their visit was sponsored by the Open World Program, whereby emerging leaders from the post-Soviet bloc swap ideas with counterparts in the U.S. Their visit limited to a scant 10 days, the Armenians have embarked on a whirlwind tour, spending most of their time in Wichita, where their sponsors, the Rotary Club of East Wichita, have ferried them to a myriad of organizations dedicated to community service, from the Kansas Leadership Center to local universities, youth centers and public radio stations.

These young leaders have an enormous passion for helping communities.

Fred Heismeyer, A former Iolan who served as the group’s coordinator

One thing quickly stood out to Fred Heismeyer, a former Iolan now living in Wichita and who served as the group’s coordinator: the Armenians needed no lessons in motivation. “These young leaders have an enormous passion for helping their communities.” Such energy, it seemed easy enough to observe, is what has helped them accomplish so much, and bestows optimism for their country’s future.

WHILE IN IOLA, the delegates and their facilitator, Hasmik Mikayelyan, presented to Iola Rotarians projects they were working on at home and then took part in a discussion at Thrive Allen County to learn what community projects were taking place across southeast Kansas.

Delegate Dr. Samvel Grigoryan works with the National Institute of Health in Armenia as a policy researcher. He presented to Rotary on health and wellness issues facing the country, along with current projects he’s involved in. Of particular interest was a robot he is working to design that assists physicians. The robot interacts and plays with young patients, helping to lower stress and help children feel more comfortable while receiving medical care.

Another delegate, Emilya Voskanyan, is part of the Eurasia Partnership Foundation, a group dedicated to promoting, among other goals, freedom of religion and economic opportunity. She shared with Rotary her passion for psychology and teaching.

She works with the American Library and Training Center as well, working with Peace Corps volunteers to instruct people how to read and write in English, create video blogs and more.

Emilya is also involved with an initiative called MICE, Media for Informed Civic Engagement, that teaches young people how to critically analyze and implement different forms of media.

Akin to Thrive’s efforts to make Allen the healthiest rural county in Kansas, Voskanyan works to “empower people in the Tavush, Lori and Shirak regions to affect change for social justice and economic prosperity … helping them to improve their communities and their own lives.”

Delegate Vahe Khachikyan is a project manager, youth worker and civic journalist.

One project he’s involved with is the Armenian “NGO Center,” which provides social organizations across his country with key information so they can effectively address a broad range of concerns affecting communities.

The Center also provides “training, consultancy, research and awareness” to bring about positive social interventions.

DURING the discussion at Thrive, Khachikyan said he was inspired to get involved in Armenia because when he was younger, he felt as though he “lived in a foreign county, not in a country [he] would like to have.”

In order to bring about positive changes, Khachikyan highlighted the importance of youth leadership, the power of music and repeatedly engaging in social and political efforts until you succeed.

He and Marcia Davis, who works through Thrive Allen County to assist LaHarpe, found common ground while delving into the complexities of motivating people in small communities.

On this point, Thrive CEO Lisse Regehr chimed in as well, noting the importance of finding people’s skill sets and passions, thus empowering them to move things forward.

Delegate Zuzan Khuboyan shared with Rotary her sadness that many have come to know of her ethnic group — the Yazidis — only because of the genocide of her people committed by ISIS in northern Iraq and Syria. The mass slaughter, enslavement and human trafficking of the Yazidi people resulted in approximately half a million refugees. The United Nations estimates more than five thousand Yazidi were murdered, with thousands more kidnapped, between 2014 and 2017.

These horrors have not dampened Khuboyan’s pride in the history of her people. Far from it. Armenia has a Yazidi community of over 35,000, and Khuboyan provided multiple examples of her efforts to strengthen her community, working with youth and women’s groups to provide opportunities for exercise and employment.

She now focuses on journalism and politics, and serves as a social worker in order to protect children’s rights.

Finally, delegate Lusine Karapetyan has worked to create a youth center in Armenia, and is president of a non-governmental organization called Solution Hub, which focuses on community development.

During the discussion at Thrive, when asked how to bring about positive changes in one’s community, Karapetyan said “energy comes from ownership” and suggested that people, no matter where they live, must feel a sense of belonging in order to get involved. 

This point in particular seemed to summarize the challenge ahead of these bright young leaders. Their task — to create an Armenia where all feel welcome, and young people feel ownership of their communities and invested in their country’s future — is a daunting one.

Yet after talking with Thrive and sharing their hopes and dreams — as well as challenges — these young leaders seemed to have a lot in common with their American counterparts. 

It would seem the notion that our countries should be “of the people, by the people, for the people,” is something that inspires citizens not only here at home, but around the world.



Asbarez: Thoughts & Observations


Garen Yegparian

BY GAREN YEGPARIAN

A number of items in recent weeks have made me go “Hmmmm”, so I thought I’d share them.

Let’s start with the news about former President Serzh Sarkisian’s trial commencing. It seems he and his cohorts are claiming that the trial is “politically motivated”. I have no doubt that’s absolutely true. But, regardless of the motivation, if investigations have turned up evidence of the corruption asserted, then what relevance does the “motivation” have? Let the trial proceed and if he’s found guilty, then punish him appropriately. This is the kind of approach I recommended last week regarding the judges of the Republic of Armenia’s Constitutional Court – investigate, charge, prosecute, try, and punish if found guilty. Don’t subvert the country’s constitution for “political motivations” regardless of the validity of the desired goal.

While we’re on presidents, let’s look at Donald Trump, too. In a recent op-ed piece, Cong. Adam Schiff described him as a threat to democracy and advocated enacting new legislation to prevent future abuses of power such as the ones manifested by Trump. One of the examples cited in the piece is his abuse of the presidential pardon power. It really was disgusting to see a bunch of crooks rendered “innocent”. And, if you think this is all “OK”, consider an Armenian perspective. It seems that the former General Michael Flynn may be getting reviewed and he may also get a pardon. You might recall he had become a paid hack for Turkey and in the process of lobbying for that country, broke U.S. laws,

And since we are deeply in the world of politics now, please remember to vote if you live in a jurisdiction that is holding presidential primary election on March 3 (Alabama, American Samoa, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Democrats Abroad, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia). If you aren’t registered to vote, in some of these locations, you can go to a polling station, register on the spot, and cast a ballot. California is one of those. Or, if you don’t have that option, please, while it’s on your mind, register to vote now so you can vote in the November General Election. I’ve already written about who I suggest voting for in “Primary Time: Parts One and Two.” The most general recommendation is in the Democratic Primary Election – vote for Tulsi Gabbard. Regardless of who you vote for, though, please DO VOTE, VOTE, VOTE.

Ending on a lighter, but VERY interesting note, let’s talk about the microbes (bacteria, fungi, and protozoa) I was reading about in January’s “National Geographic” issue. The piece was about the emerging study and science of the “gut biome” – that’s all the microbes in poop to you and me – along with bacteria in/on other parts of our body. It turns out that some 38,000,000,000,000 (that’s 38 trillion) bacteria live in the average human’s large intestine, more than 90% of the bacteria found on us. These teeny-tiny critters, it turns out, have a huge influence on us. To a certain degree, they seem to function like a “second brain” and influence all kinds of bodily functions and emotions. All this reminded of the old joke about all the parts of the human body arguing about which one of them was most important. The humble anus asserted its preeminence and all the other body parts snickered. So the anus closed up, and in short order all the body parts started apologizing and begging it to loosen up so all the waste could be emptied. It turns out our least pleasant body parts do, in reality, have a tremendous, to date unappreciated, level of importance!

Remember to vote and keep up your advocacy of our cause.

Sports: Aram Avagyan signs a deal with new promoter ahead of next fight

MediaMax, Armenia
Feb 18 2020
 
 
Aram Avagyan signs a deal with new promoter ahead of next fight
 
 
Professional boxer Aram Avagyan has signed a deal with Salita Promotions. He will hold his next fight under the auspices of the company.
 
The fight will take place in Detroit on March 13. Avagyan is going to face Dagoberto Aguero, Dominican boxer who has not lost a fight in his career.
 
“I missed on the WBC International Silver belt because it required significant expenditure and I did not have a promoter. I no longer work with Punch Boxing, but we parted ways by mutual consent, so there are no hard feelings between us. We just realized that our cooperation came to an end,” told Avagyan.
 
He noted that he had intensive training and sparring in the U.S. before returning to Armenia. For about a month, he has been training here under the guidance of Vahan Adilkhanyan and Karen Aghamalyan, coaches of the national boxing team.
 
“Artur Gevorgyan helped me find a new promoter. We received many offers, but chose Salita, because it offered a long-term contract. My goal is to win fights and take the title of world champion,” added Aram Avagyan.
 
According to the athlete, if he beats Aguero ahead of time, he will hold the next fight in April, and if not, in May.
 
“I am going back to the Unites States in a few days to train in Detroit. I will train with 100% dedication and fight until the end to win,” added Avagyan.
 

Armenian Activists Block Road for 2 Held in Police Killings

New York Times
Feb 12 2020

By

  • Feb. 12, 2020, 11:47 a.m. ET

YEREVAN, Armenia — Several dozen activists blocked a highway in Armenia for several hours Wednesday while demanding that authorities release two men accused of killing three police officers during an armed takeover of a police station in 2016.

The Sasna Tsrer party said its activists obstructed the Yerevan-Gyumri highway to draw public attention to their cause and moved out of the way when police arrived at the protest site.

More than 20 party activists armed with guns seized a police station in the Armenian capital in July 2016 to demand their leader's release from custody. They took several hostages and barricaded themselves inside the station for two weeks before surrendering. Three police officers were killed in the standoff.

The armed activists were arrested, and most were released on parole in 2018 pending trial. The two men who remained in custody are accused of being the ones who killed the three officers.

The protesters calling for the two to be freed Wednesday argued that the men were "only fulfilling their natural right to rebel.”

Police spokesman Ashot Agaronian confirmed that the protesters unblocked the highway.