Congressman Kenny Marchant Joined Congressional Caucus On ArmenianIs

CONGRESSMAN KENNY MARCHANT JOINED CONGRESSIONAL CAUCUS ON ARMENIAN ISSUES

PanARMENIAN.Net
26.05.2006 14:50 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Armenian Assembly welcomed the announcement today
that Congressman Kenny Marchant (R-TX) has joined the Congressional
Caucus on Armenian Issues, bringing the total membership to 158 to
date, reported the Armenian Assembly of America. Marchant is the
first Republican from the Lone Star State to join the Caucus.

“The Assembly appreciates Congressman Marchant’s expression of support
and decision to join the Armenian Caucus,” said Assembly Executive
Director Bryan Ardouny. “It is our hope that the Congressman will
coordinate with the Caucus Co-Chairs Representatives Joe Knollenberg
(R-MI) and Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ) to foster greater ties between
the United States and Armenia.”

Marchant, who is currently serving his first term in office,
represents the 24th Congressional District which encompasses portions
of Dallas, Denton, and Tarrant Counties. The Congressman serves
on the Transportation and Infrastructure, Education and Workforce,
and Government Reform Committees.

Prior to his election to the U.S. House of Representatives, Marchant
served nine terms as a Texas State Representative. During his tenure
in the state legislature, he served as Chairman of the Texas House
Committee on Financial Institutions, Chairman of the House State
Affairs Committee, and Chairman of the Texas House Republican Caucus.

Military-Industrial Courier: Blows To Iran May Provoke OperationsBet

MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COURIER: BLOWS TO IRAN MAY PROVOKE OPERATIONS BETWEEN ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN

Yerevan, May 25. ArmInfo. Blows to Iran may provoke operations between
Armenia and Azerbaijan, it is said in Aleksey Matveyev’s article,
published in the Russian “Military-Industrial Courier”.

According to Matveyev, a n unexpected power scenario may appear in
the Karabakh problem solution where Iran, USA and, possibly, other
countries of the region may be involved in addition to Armenia and
Azerbaijan. This scenario is connected with the beginning of possible
operations of Pentagon against Iran under the stipulation that
Azerbaijan will come out here as its ally as it was already during
Iraq occupation. In reply to such service, the USA will support Baku
in attempts to solve the Karabakh problem in military way. In its
turn, Baku, having seen the Americans favour to it, could have secret
contacts with Pentagon.

As the author notes, Aliyev welcomes the Iranian contacts even
outwardly. On the other hand, he has no reasons to quarrel with
Tehran, after all, a mutually beneficial cooperation is being
developed with the neighbor, including natural gas transportation
from Iran to Azerbaijan. Iran and Azerbaijan are connected with
ethnic ties (about 16 mln Azerbaijanians live in Iran, that is twice
more than the number of Azerbaijan itself ). Aliyev-younger follows a
different-vector policy, which means that good-neighbor relations of
Baku with Tehran are supported by Moscow and do not break the safety
balance, though Americans, interested in strengthening the influence
on Caspia, would like to break it. On the other hand, Aliyev assumes
that Americans may be on the side of Baku in the Karabakh conflict
in response to loyalty. It is quite clear that it cannot be expected
from Moscow. Aliyev had never refused from the American assistance and
hopes for more, i.e. the USA assistance in the recreation of country’s
integrity. However, no efficient assistance, including the military
one, to Baku is observed yet from the Americans. In case of operations
beginning against Karabakh and Armenia, it will need an international
support. Washington can render such assistance. The author dos not
rule out that in case of entering into an alliance between Baku
and Washington and operations beginning from the USA against Iran,
Tehran will help Armenia in the struggle against Azerbaijan Army.

According to the source, the 2006 military budget of Azerbaijan is $600
mln, budget of Armenia – $150 mln. According to the western sources,
number of Azerbaijan’s AF is 69 900 (people). Meanwhile, rather great
forces are concentrated in Karabakh, i.e. 20 000 – 25 000 people of
crew, 316 units of tanks, 332 of artillery (122 mm and higher).

The Co-Chairs Had Nothing To Say Except Distributing Paper

THE CO-CHAIRS HAD NOTHING TO SAY EXCEPT DISTRIBUTING PAPER

A1+
[08:46 pm] 25 May, 2006

The diplomats announced in Armenian that they have a “surprise” for
the journalists. The “surprise” was that 6 members of the delegation
read a small announcement for the journalists made at the end of
the meetings. By the way, the reading was divided into “roles;” the
announcement was divided into three parts which were introduced in
Russian, English and French.

It is noteworthy that the readers were not the OSCE Minsk group
Co-chairs, but they were Daniel Fried, assistant of US State Secretary,
Grigori Karasin, Russian deputy Foreign Minister and Ambassador Pier
Moriel, representative of the French Foreign Ministry who came to
the region with the Co-chairs of the Minsk group.

“We, the representatives at the Deputy level of the Russian Federation,
United States, and France, together with the Co-chairs and Personal
Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office, have come together
in this joint diplomatic mission because of the need to promote a
peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and because now
is the time for the sides to reach agreement on the basic principles
of a settlement.”

We were received by President Kocharyan and met earlier with Foreign
Minister Oskanyan. As we did yesterday in Baku, we have discussed
important aspects of a future settlement. We have worked to create
the conditions for a meeting of the two presidents in the near
future. We have stressed the belief of our nations and, more widely,
of the international community that the conflict can be resolved in
no other way than a peaceful one. Both countries should, moreover,
prepare their publics for peace and not for war.

Our discussions, both today in Yerevan and yesterday in Baku, were
constructive. We met yesterday with President Aliyev and Foreign
Minister Mammadyarov.

Tomorrow we will return to our capitals to brief our leaders. The
Co-chairs will, as well, brief the OSCE and the international
community.

A joint mission such as this one is a special event.

It must be taken as a sign of the seriousness with which we approach
the issue and, in particular, a belief that we are at the point where
a mutually beneficial agreement is achievable. What happens now will
be up to Armenia and Azerbaijan. We are pleased to be in Yerevan and
wish to express our gratitude to President Kocharyan and people of
Armenia for receiving us.

Children Face Expulsion, To Save French Identity

CHILDREN FACE EXPULSION, TO SAVE FRENCH IDENTITY
Julio Godoy

IPS, Belgium
May 24 2006

PARIS, May 23 (IPS) – Five-year-old Mariama could be taken away from
France Jun. 30. By that date all children of illegal immigrants must
leave France, under an order issued October last year.

Mariama is the daughter of a Senegalese couple in Suresnes, 20km
north of Paris. She is among about 30,000 children and youth that the
French police have been ordered to expel, or as officially stated,
to “escort to the borders..”

But that expulsion policy is being contested by school, church, and
municipal authorities, and by many French citizens. The network of
teachers and state school workers ‘Education sans frontiers’ (Education
without borders) has launched a campaign to protect immigrant children.

‘Education without borders’ represents some 130 associations of
teachers and parents. The network has released a declaration ‘We
will shelter and nourish them’, urging French citizens to oppose the
expulsion policy.

“We will not allow state authorities to commit this infamy against
children in our names,” Helène Dugros, a teacher at a primary school
in Blagnac village 800km south of Paris told IPS. Seven of the 15
children in her class are from immigrant families. “I will protect
as many as I can,” she said.

The call is finding widespread support, even though the October 2005
order provides for up to five years imprisonment and a fine of up to
30,000 euros (37,000 dollars) for anyone helping immigrant children.

“I am taking the risk of breaking this law,” Pierre Labeyrie, local
deputy for the Green Party in Toulouse declared. “I will support
immigrant children and their parents, I will give them shelter in my
home, and I will refuse all cooperation with the police.”

Teacher Bruno Leroy says democrats in France have no choice but to
violate the law.

“We will not allow (the authorities) to destroy these children’s
lives. They are our students, our own children’s buddies,” Leroy told
IPS. “They speak our language, they learn at our schools, they have
the very same joys as us, as our children.”

Leroy rejected the argument that the order should be respected because
it has been passed by a democratically elected government.

“If people always would have respected wrong laws formulated by
democratic governments, then blacks in the U.S. would still be
suffering from officially-sanctioned racism,” he said.

Leroy cited the case of Rosa Parks. On Dec. 1, 1955, Parks refused to
obey the segregation law that would have compelled her to give up a
seat in a bus to a white passenger. In so doing, she helped trigger
a fight for civil rights. She died in October 2005.

In France the fight is being taken up by several celebrities. Among
them are filmmaker Bertrand Tavernier, pop musician Mano Solo,
cartoonist Jacques Tardy and educationist Philippe Merieu.

Some municipal authorities are refusing to cooperate with the police.

Deputy mayor of Paris Eric Ferrand who is in charge of schools
declared: “The municipal government of Paris will not provide any
assistance (to police) which could lead to the identification of
children attending schools in the city.” Ferrand urged “all actors
of school life in Paris to refuse cooperation” with the police.

The pursuit of immigrant children is becoming embarrassing for
the police.

Last month a police squad arrived early morning at a hotel in Lyon,
600 km south of Paris, where a group of immigrant children were being
sheltered. Among the children to be expelled was Azerie, seven-year-old
daughter of Armenian parents, and her two elder brothers.

When the police arrived, Azerie simply hid under the bed. The police
chose not to drag her out, and left saying that in such a case they
would have to arrest the mother as well.

French governments of all colours have been expelling illegal
immigrants for the last 15 years. In 2004, the government expelled
about 16,000 people. The number increased to almost 20,000 in 2005,
and is expected to rise to 30,000 this year.

The expulsion of children forms a part of the policy introduced by
minister for the interior Nicolas Sarkozy. Sarkozy, who will be running
for president early next year, has introduced another law this year
toughening conditions for foreigners wishing to settle in France.

The law, which was approved by parliament May 17, tightens control
over bi-national marriages, and on travel for relatives of immigrants
living in France. It establishes new criteria to select immigrants.

Sarkozy, who defended the law saying that France needed to “choose”
immigrants instead of “suffering” them, has been accused of wooing
the right-wing electorate, which won about 15 percent of the vote in
the last election.

Didier Fassin, president of the French medical committee to protect
exiles, has described the new law as “the most restrictive since
World War II, and one that will have grave social and humanitarian
consequences.”

Fassin told IPS that the French parliament has passed five laws on
immigration in less than 20 years, each more restrictive than the
earlier one. “These laws have all aggravated the living conditions
of immigrants and exiles, leading to the degradation of our social
tissue.”

Socialist parliamentarian Bernard Roman accused Sarkozy in parliament
of trying “to seduce the reactionary electorate.” Sarkozy told the
National Assembly: “Immigration is a source of anxiety among our
compatriots, who fear for their security, their jobs and their way of
life.” He said the aim of the new law was to shape “France’s identity
in 30 years.”

As Sarkozy sees it, Mariama will not be a part of that identity —
unless her supporters succeed is saving her from expulsion.

–Boundary_(ID_G9xOksAKBdEglwh5kTh7VA) —

Toulouse: Manifestation De Soutien A Une Lyceenne Azerie MenaceeD’Ex

TOULOUSE: MANIFESTATION DE SOUTIEN A UNE LYCEENNE AZERIE MENACEE D’EXPULSION

Agence France Presse
24 mai 2006 mercredi 2:18 PM GMT

Plusieurs dizaines d’elèves et d’enseignants du lycee Bellevue de
Toulouse se sont rassembles devant l’etablissement mercredi a la
mi-journee en soutien a une elève azerie menacee d’expulsion avec
toute sa famille, a constate un journaliste de l’AFP.

Le rassemblement, en presence de la jeune Amina, 19 ans, elève en
deuxième annee de BEP vente au lycee professionnel, s’est deroule
a l’issue d’une audience du tribunal administratif qui a rejete le
recours en annulation de la famille contre un arrete prefectoral de
reconduite a la frontière.

“La famille d’Amina, poussee a fuir l’Azerbaïdjan en raison de ses
origines armeniennes, est en France depuis trois ans, après avoir passe
huit ans en Allemagne. Cette jeune fille a un vrai projet professionnel
et de vie en France, alors qu’elle et sa famille seraient menacees
en Azerbaïdjan”, a declare une responsable du comite de soutien,
Myriam Martin, enseignante et deleguee CGT du lycee professionnel.

“Je suis surprise. Nous avions le droit de notre côte mais aussi
l’humanite, nous allons faire appel, ce n’est pas possible d’emigrer
encore”, a declare la jeune fille en pleurs.

Le père et la mère d’Amina, son frère aîne et son epouse ainsi que
leurs deux enfants en bas âge sont vises par l’arrete prefectoral,
mais Amina peut en principe achever son annee scolaire en France.

“Nous allons continuer de faire signer des petitions et poursuivre
la mobilisation traditionnelle, mais a un moment donne la question
de cacher ceux qui sont menaces pourrait se poser, meme si ce n’est
pas legal. Il y a actuellement une nuance enorme entre la loi et la
justice”, a declare Mme Martin.

–Boundary_(ID_O/P010otkNKOUgVs3wFhWw)–

Women Make 71% Of People Having Unemployed Status In Armenia In Late

WOMEN MAKE 71% OF PEOPLE HAVING UNEMPLOYED STATUS IN ARMENIA IN LATE MARCH

Noyan Tapan
May 22 2006

MAY 22, NOYAN TAPAN. The averige number of the economically active
inhabitation of Armenia made 1163.6 thousand people in January-March,
92.3% or 1074.3 thousand of who were engaged in the economy, and 7.7%
or 89.3 thousand of who had no job. The latters were registered at
the “RA Employment Service” agency of the RA Ministry of Labour and
Social Issues and got unemployed status.

According to data of the NA National Statistical Service, as of late
March, 92.5% or 107.5 thousand people of the 116.2 thousand registered
ones searching job were unemployed. 84.7% or 91 thousand of them got
the unemployed status.

Women made 71% of the officially registered unempolyed people.

Nato Is Not Offering Peacemakers To Karabakh

NATO IS NOT OFFERING PEACEMAKERS TO KARABAKH

Lragir.am
23 May 06

It is unlikely that NATO will deploy peacemaking forces in the
Karabakh conflict area. This viewpoint was expressed by Robert
Simons, the special representative of the Secretary General of NATO,
who is visiting Armenia for two days. Simons said the question of
peacemakers could be considered only after an agreement between the
parties. Moreover, Simons thinks that the parties will be deciding
the number of these forces, what organizations they will represent
and where they will be stationed.

Simons said the question of peacemakers could be decided by the sides
after reaching an agreement. He mentioned that NATO is not offering
participation in the peacemaking mission. Generally, Robert Simons
states that NATO is not engaged in the settlement of the Karabakh
conflict but it is willing to support the OSCE Minsk Group. According
to Robert Simons, the mandate of mediation of the settlement of the
conflict belongs to the OSCE.

Robert Simons states that the head of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly
Pierre Leluche can have his stance on the settlement, and he can
even offer mediation. He states that the NATO Parliamentary Assembly
is an independent organization and can have its standpoint, but
the standpoint of NATO is that the talks for the Karabakh conflict
are mediated by the OSCE Minsk Group, and they can only give their
support. He says almost the same thing about the Armenian-Turkish
relations, stating that it is a matter of bilateral relations.

Although Turkey approved launching an individual partnership program
with Armenia, Simons said, nevertheless, that NATO does not attend
to the internal political problems of its members.

According To Victor Dallakian, There Is No Coalition Any More,And Ne

ACCORDING TO VICTOR DALLAKIAN, THERE IS NO COALITION ANY MORE, AND NEW MAJORITY MUST BE CREATED

Noyan Tapan
May 23 2006

YEREVAN, MAY 23, NOYAN TAPAN. The National Assembly Speaker’s
resignation may not be considered not to be an agenda issue of the
Parliament, and deputies have a right to touch upon that issue. Victor
Dallakian, the “Ardaroutiun” (Justice) faction Secretary stated
about it at the May 22 NA sitting, in responce to Tigran Torosian’s
persuasions to pass to discussion of the agenda issues. “Nobody has a
right to advise deputies and say that they do not speak in connection
with the agenda: I told you, isn’t the NA Speaker’s resignation
an issue of the agenda?,” Dallakian mentioned. According to him,
a serious event took place in the country which must be estimated
by deputies. Dallakian stated that today the coalition making the
parliamentary majority, which has 50-55 deputies, makes an attempt
“to re-form parliamentary works.” The “Ardaroutiun” faction Secretary
mentioned that there is no coalition any more, and there are two ways
in the created situation: dissolution of the Parliament and holding
of new parliamentary elections, or resignation of the Government and
formation of a new parliamentary majority.

No Matter How Unnatural It Seems

NO MATTER HOW UNNATURAL IT SEEMS
By Ruben Hayrapetian in Moscow

AZG Armenian Daily
23/05/2006

The coverage of the Armenia A320 crash in Russian media is viewed in
Armenia as an expression of sympathy from the Russians. In general,
it is so. Yet, no matter how indiscreet raising this issue may seem,
it turns out that even the coverage of such a tragic accident cannot
avoid being politicized. Media reports that followed the crash reveal
underlying themes.

So, what are the Russian papers writing? The crash of A320 early
this month and the fire at the Brussels airport are viewed as a
manifestation of rivalry between Boeing of the USA and European
Airbus. The Russian printed press writes that in this rivalry the
US monopolistic interests coincide with Washington’s foreign policy
in the region where “pro-Russian” Armenia upsets its plans regarding
monopoly in Caspian basin.

In terms of time the crash coincided with the Vilnius get-together of
anti-Russian forces where US vice-president Dick Cheney’s speech caused
panic in Kremlin. Russian FM Sergei Lavrov’s toothless response that
Cheney’s assistants misinterpreted “our democracy” reduced Russian
leadership’s comeback to minimum. It’s clear that a scandal with
world leaders at the threshold of hyped up G8 summit in Petersburg
was not playing into president Putin’s hands.

Reportedly, the Kremlin “warned” mass media to overlook the American’s
ultimatum-like speech. But on the other hand, how to mitigate the
fact of humiliation before a public challenge? It is here that the
mass media resorts to full-scale broadcast of Armenian jet crash. A
very human, distracting and respectful way towards the “strategic
partner”…

BAKU: CE Ministerial Committee To Consider Written Question OnArmeni

CE MINISTERIAL COMMITTEE TO CONSIDER WRITTEN QUESTION ON ARMENIA’S NEW OCCUPATION PLANS
Author: R.Abdullayev

TREND, Azerbaijan
May 22 2006

The Council of Europe Ministerial Committee will consider on 24 May a
written inquiry by an Azerbaijani parliamentary representative to the
PACE, MP Rafael Huseynov, on the level of permanent representatives.

The document titled “New plans of occupation by belligerent Armenia
posing serious threats to stability and development in the South
Caucasus” was included in the draft agenda of the 965th meeting of
the CE Ministerial Committee to be held in Strasbourg on 24 May.

The discussions rank as the third in the initial agenda of the
gathering.

The document underlines that by intensifying its hostilities
during recent days the Republic of Armenia, shown in Assembly
resolution (1416 (2005) as an occupying state conducting ethnic
cleansing against the Azerbaijanis, is putting forward its new
aggressive plans. Armenia has occupied 7 adjacent districts around
Nagorno-Karabakh and uses these territories as a buffer zone between
the other territories of Azerbaijan and Nagorno-Karabakh. However,
despite the existing cease-fire in recent days, the armed forces of
Armenia are continuously threatening hostilities on the front line
bordering the positions of Azerbaijan, which is located hundreds
of kilometres from Nagorno-Karabakh. These attacks, accompanied by
numerous human losses among the civilian population and the military
contingent of Azerbaijan, as well as with great material losses and
destruction inflicted on the country, openly demonstrate the purposes
of Armenia to occupy some other territories of Azerbaijan.

On the other hand, Armenia has escalated its efforts to pursue its
plots vis-a-vis Azerbaijan. Thus, the previously existing intentions of
Armenia to seize the Autonomous Republic of Nakhchivan of Azerbaijan
are now openly being manifested. Armenia has set up appropriate
military and intelligent structures in this regard, a cease-fire regime
is repeatedly being violated in the front line areas almost on a daily
basis, groundless misinformation is being spread by them concerning
the alleged destruction of some old graves in Nakhchivan with the
intention to substantiate by false means their territorial claims and,
moreover, a new wave of ideological war has been launched by Yerevan.

Rafael Huseynov asked the Committee of Ministers “In the present
situation when Armenia, officially considered to be an occupier by the
Assembly, putting forward manifestly its new occupying intentions and
with this purpose in mind undertaking concrete steps, what discussions
can the Committee of Ministers conduct within its competences and
what effective measures can it take in order to stop the aggressor”.