Armenian Parliament Speaker Formally Submitted Resignation

ARMENIAN PARLIAMENT SPEAKER FORMALLY SUBMITTED RESIGNATION

PanARMENIAN.Net
22.05.2006 12:55 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ During today’s sitting Chairman of the Armenian
National Assembly Artur Baghdassaryan formally submitted his
resignation. According to the regulations, the Parliament Speaker
should confirm his resignation within 5 days and then leave his
post. To remind, Artur Baghdassaryan announced of the intention to
leave the post May 12, after Orinats Yerkir Party political council
decided to secede from the ruling coalition. It should also be noted
that head of the parliamentary committee on defense, home affairs
and national security Mher Shahgeldyan and head of the parliamentary
committee on social issues, health and ecology Gagik Mkheyan offered
resignation today.

Andre 8th to Eurovision Song Contest

ANDRE, 8st to EUROVISION SONG CONTEST

Jean Eckian

May 21, 2006

Retransmitted in 24 countries of Europe, the Eurovision Song Contest
exists since May 24, 1956. For its first participation, in front of
150 million people, Armenia, represented by the singer ANDRE with his
song “With your Love” was classified in 8th position.

In France, during the presentation of the Armenian singer, the
presenter star of French TV (France 3), Michel DRUCKER said: “In 1915,
1 million and half of Armenians perished in the first genocide of the
twenty century by the Turks. Will be needed nevertheless, a day, that
Turkey recognizes this genocide “

www.inhomage.com

Two Weeks After Crash And Hangar Fire, Armavia Takes Second A319,Pla

TWO WEEKS AFTER CRASH AND HANGAR FIRE, ARMAVIA TAKES SECOND A319, PLANS TO ADD REGIONAL AIRCRAFT
By David Kaminski-Morrow in London

Flight International
May 19 2006

Two weeks after separate accidents wiped out much of its fleet,
Armenian carrier Armavia has taken delivery of the second of two
Airbus A319s and stated that it intends to complement its fleet with
50- to 70-seat regional aircraft.

Yerevan-based Armavia has received the A319 which, like its
predecessor, was formerly operated by US carrier Independence Air. It
will bear the registration EK-32012. “Soon this aircraft will begin
operating scheduled services,” says the carrier.

It has also revealed that its fleet plan includes acquiring a regional
aircraft with 50-70 seats, but the carrier has not indicated a type –
although it says that the aircraft will be “American”.

Armavia fleet additions come two weeks after a fatal Black Sea crash
and a subsequent maintenance hangar fire at Brussels destroyed two
of its three Airbus A320 aircraft.

Introduction of the A319 brings its fleet up to six aircraft – two
A319s, its sole remaining A320, an Ilyushin Il-86, plus a Yakovlev
Yak-42 and Yak-40 – but the airline says that its policy is not to
use aircraft manufactured before 2000.

A Boycott Set Up Against The New Speaker

A BOYCOTT SET UP AGAINST THE NEW SPEAKER

A1+
[04:47 pm] 18 May, 2006

“Justice” Bloc made a decision about their strategy after the
resignation of NA Speaker Arthur Baghdasaryan and during the election
of the new Speaker.

The decision made at the end of one-year session was not accepted
unanimously. First of all the representatives of the “Republican” party
did not participate in the session, besides, Arshak Sadoyan, Chairman
of “National Democrats’ Alliance”, didn’t approve of the strategy.

“I have always said and still claim that the question of alternative
approach should be taken into account.

NA isn’t a puncher to decide who is a NA candidate and to participate
in that process with one candidate.

Anyway, it will be much wiser to propose several candidates for the
post, ask them questions, hold disputes and discussions, etc.”

By the way, Arshak Sadoyan informed his partners of the bloc that if
they counter any problems they can nominate his candidacy for the NA
Speaker’s post. Mr.

Sadoyan excludes the version of self nomination saying, “I am against
self nomination for any office.

I have always claimed that I cannot propose my candidature as it
won’t look beautiful.”

In Sadoyan’s opinion there will be great surprise in the Parliament
in this connection as everything is possible in the country in which
lingers of pressure are well known to him. But Sadoyan didn’t comment
on what he meant by saying surprise.

Ruzan Khachatryan, press secretary of the “Justice” Bloc, noted that
the party has no expectations connected with the nomination of the
NA Speaker’s office as they decided neither to participate in the
process nor to vote.

The deputies of “Justice” will likely participate only in the
discussions to make their point of view audible. “Justice” Bloc didn’t
take part in the 2003 elections either and won’t do it this time on
the same grounds. The reasons are as follows; NA elections are held
with frauds and they don’t go in line with the reality, thus “Justice”
doesn’t want to be involved in those “inland intrigues.”

By the way, another opposing power of the NA, “National Unity,”
has also decided not to participate in the parliamentary elections.

Hayordats Tun Opened In Ashtarak

HAYORDATS TUN OPENED IN ASHTARAK

Noyan Tapan
May 18 2006

ASHTARAK, MAY 18, NOYAN TAPAN. Hayordats Tun (Armenian-borns’ house)
acting under the patronage of the Armenian Apostolic Church was founded
in the city of Ashtarak, the marz center of Aragatsotn. This center
of religious, artistic and Armenian-type education of the younger
generation was founded on the initiative of Archimandarite Torgom
Tonikian, the primate of the Aragatsont diocese who is the spiritual
instructor of the Yerevan Hayordats school as well.

Pupils attending the Hayordats school, studying the centuries-old
history of the Armenian Church, at the same time become skilled
at different branches of art, enjoy pleasure of contact with
beautiful. The city art school passed under management of the Mother
See of Holy Etchmiadzin for the Hayordats school of Ashtarak. Programs
of fundamental restoration of the new educational institution are in
process at present.

G. Chaliand: L’Etat Ne Doit Pas Legiferer Sur Tout

G. CHALIAND: L’ETAT NE DOIT PAS LEGIFERER SUR TOUT

Charente Libre
18 mai 2006

Historien du genocide armenien, Gerard Chaliand n’est pas favorable
au projet de loi socialiste. C’est une question complexe, explique
l’auteur avec Yves Ternon d’un ouvrage très documente sur la tragedie
et publie dans les annees 1980. A titre personnel, je ne suis pas
partisan que l’Etat legifère sur tout comme il l’a fait recemment
avec la colonisation. Je trouve plus democratique de pouvoir discuter
des choses en sachant de toute facon que les faits sont averes et
que seules des personnes mal informees ou de francs salauds peuvent
encore contester l’existence du genocide perpetre contre les Armeniens.

M. Chaliand note que la France a deja reconnu le genocide par une
loi en 2001 mais le fait de reconnaître est une chose, le fait de
sanctionner le negationnisme en est une autre, dit-il en se prononcant
sur le principe contre la punition. En revanche, il estime que si la
loi Gayssot sanctionnant le negationnisme de la Shoah s’applique aux
Juifs, on ne voit pas pourquoi la meme chose ne s’appliquerait pas aux
Armeniens. Mais pour lui, face a l’aneantissement de 1,2 million a 1,5
million d’Armeniens en 1915 et 1917 par le gouvernement ottoman des
Jeunes Turcs dans le contexte de la Première guerre mondiale, concu
comme une operation strategique, il n’y a plus rien a discuter sur le
fond, les archives sont la, celles des allies comme des adversaires. Le
pretexte etait la rebellion, le moyen officiel, la deportation.

–Boundary_(ID_gWyI43UzSpxpjg2LCvZjW A)–

Halil Berktay :” Le Paysage Intellectuel En Turquie A Change Sur Le

HALIL BERKTAY : ” LE PAYSAGE INTELLECTUEL EN TURQUIE A CHANGE SUR LE GENOCIDE ARMENIEN ”
Propos recueillis par Sophie Shihab

Le Monde, France
18 mai 2006

Dans un entretien au ” Monde “, l’historien turc, qui reconnaît le
genocide, estime que la nouvelle loi preparee en France aurait des
effets desastreux.

Vous etes presente comme la première figure turque a avoir reconnu la
realite du genocide armenien en Turquie. Quelle a ete votre demarche
? Les premières voix turques dissidentes, critiques du discours
nationaliste officiel, sont venues, dans les annees 1990, de Turcs
residant a l’etranger, tels Taner Akcam, Fikret Adamir ou Fatma
Muge Gocek. En octobre 2000, je fus le premier historien travaillant
en Turquie a donner une interview pour dire ce qui pousse a croire
que les massacres de 1915-1916 repondaient a des ordres de l’Etat,
illegaux et secrets. Mes propos ont paru dans un quotidien national,
Radikal, et non dans des revues confidentielles. Cela a provoque une
immense fureur, et ce fut une brèche dans le mur du silence.

Mais cette brèche ne s’est guère elargie ensuite ? Au contraire. De
plus en plus de voix se sont alors elevees. En septembre 2005, nous
avons pu organiser une conference sur les Armeniens et le declin de
l’Empire ottoman. Ce qui a mis en exergue une realite qui ne plaît pas
du tout a nos milieux dirigeants nationalistes, a savoir qu’en moins
de cinq ans le paysage intellectuel en Turquie a change. Ce n’est
plus un groupe de marginaux, mais une large couche d’universitaires,
et les journalistes les plus connus, qui pensent a l’oppose du discours
negationniste officiel, ou semi-officiel.

Les lois reconnaissant le genocide armenien adoptees a l’etranger
ont-elles eu un effet ?

Un effet complexe, contradictoire. Car toute solution durable de
cette question suppose une democratisation de la Turquie. Le deni
de la realite est un problème qui fait partie de la tragedie de la
societe turque. Il doit etre surmonte en Turquie. Ce que d’autres
pays font est certes important, mais finalement secondaire.

Comment expliquer l’amnesie collective en Turquie sur ce passe ? La
Turquie moderne, nee en 1923, n’avait aucun interet a entretenir
la memoire de ce qu’ont fait ses predecesseurs. Les puissances
occidentales, alliees de la Turquie, non plus. Après des decennies
de refoulement impose, il y a un gouffre entre ce que le monde sait
sur ce passe et ce que la societe turque, dans son ensemble, croit
savoir en toute sincerite. Après les attentats de l’Armee secrète pour
la liberation de l’Armenie – Asala, dans les annees 1970 et 1980 –
visant des diplomates turcs, la politique du silence fut remplacee
par celle du deni.

La seule riposte possible, c’est de parler, et de se faire entendre.

Certains succès sont deja la. La repetition hypocrite des cliches
negationnistes a beaucoup diminue. Mais ce n’est qu’un debut. Nous
sommes en train de creer graduellement les conditions d’un debat
normal, sans hysterie, imprecations, terreur psychologique et menaces
de lynchages. La solution ne peut pas venir d’une decision autoritaire,
par le haut.

Mais cela peut aider ? Il faut etre realiste : l’establishment va
traîner des pieds. C’est a la societe civile de faire le travail.

L’Histoire suggère d’ailleurs que le despotisme eclaire, ca ne marche
pas. Le dynamisme doit venir des mouvements d’opposition. Or il y a
une tendance actuellement en Occident, y compris en France avec le
projet de loi criminalisant le deni du genocide armenien, a vouloir
imposer des solutions a la Turquie sous forme d’ultimatums. Mais la
politique n’a pas a dicter les savoirs.

L’experience du XXe siècle devrait suffire a s’en convaincre. Il
faut des debats ouverts, libres, forcement lents. Il ne s’agit pas
d’approuver ou non ces crimes. On peut criminaliser le fait d’en
faire l’apologie, mais peut-on juger criminelle une opinion sincère
sur l’Histoire ? Voyez les debats sur les très nombreux cas où on
parle de genocide. Où mettre les limites ?

Quelles seraient en Turquie les effets d’une adoption de la nouvelle
loi en France ? Ils seraient desastreux, avant tout pour l’action
des democrates. On peut craindre que le Parlement turc n’adopte une
contre-loi, criminalisant la reconnaissance du genocide. Il y a en ce
moment une forte vague nationaliste, anti-europeenne, en Turquie. Ces
forces seraient ravies de voir l’Europe refuser l’adhesion de la
Turquie. Elles la verraient volontiers isolee comme une Birmanie.

Si la France adopte la loi, elle se privera des moyens de faire
pression contre une telle evolution. La France des droits humains se
sera tire une balle dans le pied… Le parti du premier ministre,
Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a tente de se montrer plus flexible sur les
causes nationales, dont la question armenienne. Mais il est en butte
a de vives pressions. L’adoption du projet de loi en France serait une
invite directe a son parti de se debarrasser de ses habits europeens.

–Boundary_(ID_uKiauuykZ2MVABgmFX32/g) —

Canada-Turkey Spat Won’t Affect NATO Operation

CANADA-TURKEY SPAT WON’T AFFECT NATO OPERATION

Embassy, Canada
Canada’s Foreign Policy Newsweekly
May 17 2006

Last week’s diplomatic storm over Stephen Harper’s use of the term
‘genocide’ will not affect Canada’s relations with the Turkish head
of NATO’s Afghan mission, but it does signal a policy shift.

The Turkish-Canadian spat over Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s comments
recognizing the Armenian genocide two weeks ago will not spill over
into Afghanistan where a senior Turkish diplomat presently occupies
the position of NATO’s top Civilian Representative to Afghanistan,
according to the Turkish Embassy in Ottawa.

Despite Ankara’s withdrawal last week from NATO military exercises
in the Canadian province of Alberta, Turkey’s leading NATO role
in Afghanistan with Canada will not be affected, says Yonet Tezel,
Counsellor at the Turkish Embassy.

“Our contribution is still going on and it is above our relations
with Canada,” says Mr. Tezel.

NATO is scheduled to take over military operations from the U.S. in
Afghanistan in the summer.

Mr. Tezel also says Turkey is not likely to pull out its most senior
diplomat, Hikmet Cetin, who is NATO’s Civilian Representative to
Afghanistan.

With 825 troops, Turkey has the third largest contingent in
Afghanistan, after Germany and Canada. Its role is considered important
because it is also the only Muslim country with troops in Afghanistan.

In what may signal a decrease in tensions between Canada and Turkey,
Mr. Yonet also says Turkish Ambassador Aydemir Erman is expected to
return to Canada this week. Turkey called its envoy to Canada back to
Ankara for consultations on May 6 in protest of Mr. Harper’s comments.

Mr. Harper became the first Canadian prime minister to utter the word
‘genocide’ in recognizing the deaths of 1.5 million Armenians in
Turkey in 1915. The statement also marks a major shift in Canadian
foreign policy towards Turkey, which also temporarily withdrew its
ambassador to France as a result of an impeding vote in the French
parliament that would make it a crime to deny the that genocide was
committed in Armenia.

But while it withdrew its envoy from Paris, the Turkish government
also sent a delegation to meet French legislators on the issue. It did
not do the same thing in Canada. Mr. Tezel says the circumstances are
totally different, hence the type of reaction to the French situation.

“The situation is philosophically and intellectually unacceptable,”
Mr. Tezel says of France’s decision to make it a crime to deny that
genocide was committed in Armenia.

Kim Nossal, Professor and Head of Political Studies at Queen’s
University in Kingston, says Mr. Harper’s decision acknowledging
that genocide was committed against Armenians was likely made to
send a message that the Tory government is different from the former
minority government.

“[Mr. Harper] wanted to signal that his government is different from
the Liberal government, which actually talked a lot about human rights,
but did nothing,” says Mr. Nossal.

“It was a clear and conscious set of reasoning on this,” he says.

“All you have to do is think about the Liberals and Darfur and you
can ask ‘Where were you then?'”

[email protected]

http://www.embassyma g.ca/html/index.php?display=story&full_path=/2 006/may/17/turkey/

Armenia-Diaspora Rural Poverty Eradication Program

Armenia-Diaspora Rural Poverty Eradication Program

Interview with Vartan Oskanian, Minister of Foreign Affairs

May 17, 2006

Armenia TV

Armenia TV: Minister Oskanian, you were in the United States recently, where
you talked about a new Armenia-Diaspora program. What is this program?

Vartan Oskanian: It’s a very broad effort to eradicate rural poverty in
Armenia. The strategic objective of this program is reducing poverty in
rural Armenia’s border villages through an integrated approach. The program
will provide the necessary intervention in the form of infrastructure and
technical support, and in partnership with the residents of the village, the
program will support economic development in order to enable the
sustainability and viability of rural communities. We’re proud that Armenia
has evolved so much over this decade and a half that we are now in a
position to imagine and launch such a far-reaching program.

Armenia TV: Everyone who has visited Armenia comments on the discrepancy in
lifestyle and standard of living between the cities and the rural areas.
Armenia’s economic growth indicators are impressive, but that growth really
has not reached the villages, has it?

Vartan Oskanian: You’re right. Even at this current fast pace, it will take
decades before we reach even the average European level of prosperity. If we
want to ensure that these rural communities are not destined to remain
stagnant, permanent pockets of poverty, if we want to ensure that Armenians
are not born into a cycle of poverty, then we cannot allow development to
simply take its course. We must take practical steps to intervene, to take a
short-cut towards an improved quality of life for our rural citizens.

Armenia TV: What is the scope of this program? There are nearly 1000
villages in Armenia. How will you decide where to begin?

Vartan Oskanian: Of those 1000 villages you just mentioned, 200 are within 3
miles of our borders. The effects of rural poverty and hopelessness on
migration, regional stability, geo-strategic and economic security are
obvious in these villages. That is why we have decided to begin with Armenia’s
border areas.

And, actually, in many of these villages, international organizations,
individual Armenians and the Armenian government are already engaged.
However, the extent of the damage wrought by the economic collapse and the
energy crisis was profound. As a result, it’s going to take a focused,
targeted collaborative effort to improve life for our compatriots in these
critical border areas.

In each of these villages, necessary infrastructure is simply non-existent.
Some have no paved roads, others have no running water, some have no gas or
electricity. Imagine trying to raise a family or make a living without these
basics. Then, in addition to weak infrastructure, they also are often not
economically self-sufficient. They either lack the markets for their
products, or lack the means to get the product to market. In some cases,
they have no viable product even. This is a problem throughout Armenia, but
I don’t think anyone will doubt that the border is critical.

Armenia TV: Why launch such an ambitious and novel program now?

Vartan Oskanian: Why now? There are three main reasons.

First, we want to build on the international momentum that already exists.
Over the next five years, the Millennium Challenge Corporation will build
roads and bring irrigation water to Armenia’s rural areas. In addition,
there is the generous new Lincy program that will build roads and schools
within and outside Yerevan. There are massive World Bank, USAID, DFID and
IFAD programs throughout Armenia. The Armenia Fund, too, has programs
throughout Armenia, as well as Karabakh, of course. We want to leverage
these programs and locate additional funds in order to bring comprehensive
development to the villages. Imagine that a village will, in a few years,
have irrigation water and roads, thanks to the MCC, for example. But imagine
that there will be no drinking water, no health care, no school, no gas or
electricity in that village. Imagine children growing up in a 21st century
rural community that has roads and water and electricity, but is without
access to telephone, television or internet. We can’t let that happen. Now
imagine what we could do together if the Armenian government, Armenia’s
business community, international organizations, and the Armenian Diaspora
came together to leverage the MCC contributions and to build on the MCC
momentum. Imagine a country where development is comprehensive, even, fair
and just.

The second reason to do it now is to sustain the pace of economic
development. Look, we’ve had high growth, at least in part because our point
of departure was low. Our economy had collapsed. But the more the economy
grows, the harder it will be to maintain double-digit growth. Additional
infusion and intervention is necessary and why not target that infusion
towards the areas that need it most?

Finally, Armenia has, over these 15 years, held a leading role in this
region. This may sound surprising, but it’s true. Georgia has a more
favorable geographic position and access to the sea, Azerbaijan has already
been pumping massive amounts of oil – more than 300,000 barrels a day over
the last several years, yet, according to the World Bank, per capita income
is still higher in Armenia. This is something to be proud of, but it’s also
something we must work at. We have to keep that edge even with the prospects
of additional oil revenues expected for Azerbaijan. We can do that only if
we aggressively mobilize our resources and clearly set comprehensive
economic development as our goal.

Armenia TV: In other words, you are reinforcing the adage that the Diaspora
has to make up for Azerbaijan’s oil.

Vartan Oskanian: I am saying that Armenia and Diaspora should decide that we
want every Armenian to be able to live in dignity, to be able to have hope,
to be able to believe in the future, to know that his children will be
educated, that her family can reach a doctor. That is development, that is
the path to a democratic society. Hopeless people don’t believe in
themselves or their leaders, they don’t protect or defend their votes, they
don’t care who wins or who pays them to win. We want a population that has
hope in the future, that believes in themselves, and that has the will to
take on responsibility and hold their leaders accountable.

Armenia TV: What will happen to the various organizations already working
towards rural development?

Vartan Oskanian: This program will make every effort to partner with all
existing organizations and programs in order to achieve maximum
effectiveness and efficiency. We have already spoken to every single
organization, individual and agency (more than 100 in number) with programs
in Armenia’s villages. Our program is not intended to replace or compete
with existing programs. On the contrary, we will work with them to build on
their efforts, to increase their capacity. Our website will reflect their
efforts as well, so that donors and participants receive a complete picture
of what is being done, and what is still needed.

Armenia TV: How will you seek support for this program?

Vartan Oskanian: This very serious and far-reaching program can only succeed
with the active engagement and involvement of a variety of actors and
participants. Individual countries have already expressed a willingness to
focus their development assistance on our rural areas. International
organizations are already focused on rural development. As are individual
Diasporans and Diaspora organizations. Now, we must also engage and involve
Armenia’s businessmen, and new elements of the Diaspora. Those who have
previously looked for specific projects and not found them will find them
now. This project is varied and broad enough that individuals can find a
variety of ways of getting involved. It will be implemented over 5 years,
and this should make it easier to fundraise.

Armenia TV: On the one hand, it’s good that the Diaspora is being offered a
concrete program. On the other hand, some in the Diaspora are not prepared
to engage full-heartedly or to make long-term commitments.

Vartan Oskanian: We know and understand that there are many aspects of this,
or any new program, which will have to be explained in detail in order for
individuals and organizations in the Diaspora to feel comfortable about
engaging and giving. That is why this topic will form the focus of the
agenda of the 3d Armenia-Diaspora Conference, to be held in Yerevan,
September 18 – 20. There, we will explain the program’s purpose, how it will
be implemented, how the funds will be raised and managed, and the key issues
of transparency and accountability will be addressed. We think that it is
possible to use this program as a model for how to handle fundraising and
program implementation, and to do it in a way that inspires confidence and
ensures maximum participation.

Armenia TV: Will the management of the program remain within the MFA and the
Diaspora Conference?

Vartan Oskanian: Between now and the Armenia-Diaspora Conference, we will
have completed the design of the program, the management structure and begun
the process of assessing needs and finding sponsors for villages. After the
Armenia-Diaspora Conference, we envision that the Armenia Fund is best
situated to take over as the umbrella which will appoint a governance board,
a fiscal agent, as well as the management team. This ambitious program is a
natural expansion of the Armenia Fund’s mission – to facilitate
infrastructure and development programs that are beyond the government’s
capacity.

It was a visionary step to create the Armenia Fund, soon after independence,
when its additional resources were sorely needed. It has since completed
projects which have invaluable, strategic significance for Armenia and
Armenians. Now, we are at a stage when we can and should broaden that
vision. Fifteen years after independence, we are no longer desperate and
focused on everyday survival. Today, we must project a vision for Armenia in
2020. Our task is to develop the Armenia Fund into the kind of structure
that will make possible the creation of a prosperous, evenly developed
Armenia for our children. This program is the catalyst for that kind of
transformation. If Armenians needed to strengthen Karabakh to ensure
Karabakh’s survival and prosperity, there can be no doubt that only a strong
Armenia can ensure Karabakh’s long-term future. This rural development
program, which will work to improve the life of all Armenians in Armenia and
Nagorno Karabakh will go a long way toward ensuring the irreversibility of
those links.

Of course, the breadth and scope of the program will require the Fund to
increase capacity, to provide even greater transparency and to involve wider
segments of the Diaspora.

Armenia TV: Tell us more about the Armenia-Diaspora Conference. What else
will be on the agenda?

Vartan Oskanian: This conference will be held in the midst of the
celebrations of Armenia’s 15th anniversary. We’ve come a long way over this
decade and a half. We’ve survived against great, great odds. Over the next
15 years, we must work to transform Armenia into the land of your dreams.
That can happen if Armenia’s expectations of the Diaspora and the Diaspora’s
expectations of Armenia are more evenly matched. This conference will also
focus on those issues. In other words, with independence comes the need to
succeed economically. The rural development plan addresses that concern and
makes it possible for the Diaspora to participate in that direction. At the
same time, with independence come questions about identify, about
homeland-diaspora relations, about language and religion, about political
parties and diaspora institutions. And if our traditional organizations used
to look at these questions one way, today’s youth approaches these issues
very differently. They are looking for new answers to old questions. That is
why the second half of the conference will focus on exactly that – New
Answers to Old Questions – A Nation-State in the 21st Century.

This way, we will have addressed the two fundamental issues facing a people
and a country – identity and development — who we are and who we want to
become.

Armenia TV: Minister Oskanian, Thanks for taking the time to talk with us.

TV Reports Russian Troops Pullout From Georgia

TV REPORTS RUSSIAN TROOPS PULLOUT FROM GEORGIA

NTV Mir, Moscow
15 May 06

Excerpt from report by Russian external TV service NTV Mir “Segodnya”
news on 15 May.

[Presenter] The first echelon with Russian hardware has left the
Akhalkalaki base. The military hopes that this train as well as all
the subsequent ones will not have problems while travelling across
Georgia. The first echelon left three hours ago. The Russian and
Georgian defence ministers have agreed to close down the base and it
has to be closed down completely by the end of 2007. Our correspondent
Vadim Fefilov was watching the withdrawal of the first consignment of
Russian tanks, armoured personnel carriers and reconnaissance patrol
vehicles from the Georgian territory.

[Video shows troops leaving] [Correspondent] Lt-Gen [Valeriy]
Yevnevich makes a short report by satellite telephone to his bosses
in Moscow and the first echelon with Russian hardware pulls out of
the Ahkalkalaki base to make its way across Georgia and Azerbaijan to
Russia. Russian servicemen, just as they had promised to the Georgian
side, have managed to move tanks, combat reconnaissance vehicles,
ammunition and missiles from Akhalkalaki to the railway station of
Tsalka. That was not simple.

[Passage omitted: they had to move along difficult routes in the
mountains at an altitude of 2,500 metres; but the vehicles are in
good order because soldiers are really professional; everything is
proceeding without problems so far.]

[Correspondent, continues] It has transpired that Armenia has feared
that some of the Russian equipment may be left in Azerbaijan for some
reason. Azerbaijan’s military attache are telling their Armenian
colleagues that there is nothing to worry about.

[Passage omitted: Russia and Azerbaijan have agreed the equipment will
not be stopped in Azerbaijan; locals around the base are primarily
ethnic Armenians and they are now losing their jobs because of the
withdrawal]

[Correspondent, continuing] In line with earlier agreements between
the Russian and Georgian defence ministers another 20 echelons with
Russian heavy hardware will leave the area before the end of the year.

[Passage omitted: the correspondent signs off]