Armenian National Committee of America accuses USAID of ‘epic failure’ during Nagorno-Karabakh humanitarian crisis

MEDYA News
Nov 24 2023

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) spent more on photographers for Samantha Power’s, the agency’s administrator, October visit to Armenia than it did on humanitarian programs within Artsakh over the past three years, the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) said on Tuesday.

“No aid. No airlift. Outright abandonment. An epic USAID failure on every level,” the Committee added.

ANCA’s remarks were in response to Power’s Tuesday statement regarding the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Nagorno-Karabakh two months after the aggression of Azerbaijan forced over 100,000 Armenians to flee their homes and seek refuge in neighbouring Armenia.

In her statement, Power announced an additional $4 million in aid to assist the displaced individuals, bringing the total US humanitarian assistance for the Nagorno-Karabakh response to $28 million since 2020.

Power also expressed gratitude for the Armenian government’s generous reception of the displaced population and said that the US support in ensuring that those affected receive the necessary assistance would continue.

“On my recent visit to Armenia, I got to hear directly from many of the displaced people from NK [Nagorno-Karabakh] about the tremendous hardship, and heartbreak, of having to flee their homes,” said Power.

During the recent conflict between Azerbaijan and Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh to Armenians), which resulted in the displacement of most of the Armenian population, USAID had faced criticism that the amount of humanitarian aid it provided to civilians in the region was too low.

According to the ANCA, the US government had also sent military aid to Azerbaijan and refused to impose sanctions on the country despite calls from the Armenian community, while also failing to allocate aid to the region since the 2020 war.

The lightning offensive against the self-declared Republic of Artsakh was launched by neighbouring Azerbaijan on 20 September and eventually resulted in Azeri forces taking control of the region, forcing an estimated 70,500 Armenians to flee the region in the following days.

Ethnic Armenians in the enclave had been defending the self-declared republic for three decades. Despite its geographical location within Azerbaijan’s territory, the region had functioned autonomously for decades and maintained its de facto government.

https://medyanews.net/armenian-national-committee-of-america-accuses-usaid-of-epic-failure-during-nagorno-karabakh-humanitarian-crisis/

Turkish Press: Armenia’s Pashinian claims discussion on enclave exchange evolving with Azerbaijan

Nov 25 2023
Politics  |Editor : Kevser Erbay
2023-11-25 09:42:03 | Last Update : 2023-11-25 10:48:03

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan addressed the ongoing discussions regarding the potential exchange of enclaves between Armenia and Azerbaijan. 

Pashinyan confirmed talks had occurred with Baku, emphasizing the need for a peaceful resolution. The proposed options include confirming sovereignty over specific territories or maintaining the current situation under legal validation. Pashinyan highlighted the forthcoming peace treaty as the platform for resolving these issues.

Tensions between the two nations trace back to the early '90s when Armenia occupied Nagorno-Karabakh and surrounding regions, recognized internationally as part of Azerbaijan. A significant portion of this territory was reclaimed by Azerbaijan during the 2020 conflict, mediated by Russia, paving the way for normalization.

Recent events include an Azerbaijani anti-terrorism operation in Karabakh, resulting in the surrender of separatist forces. Azerbaijan, now asserting full control in the region, has extended invitations for the Armenian population in Karabakh to integrate into Azerbaijani society.

The dialogue between Armenia and Azerbaijan remains ongoing, with the hope of finding a diplomatic resolution to longstanding territorial disputes.

Source: Anadolu Agency

https://www.turkiyenewspaper.com/politics/17337

Armenian National Orchestra Plays for Its People

The Boston Musical Intelligencer
Nov 26 2023
Eduard Topchjan

It was clear, even before the concert began, that the enthusiastic, nattily well-dressed, largely Armenian crowd that gathered Tuesday night at Symphony Hall anticipated a extraordinary evening of music and kinship. I almost felt like I was crashing a huge family reunion. It was the friendliest and most happily expectant crowd I’d seen at a concert in a long time. The first balcony and floor were packed.

Armenia has had an extremely tough time of it historically, especially since the genocide of 1915. This concert aimed to redress the most recent heartbreaking humanitarian disaster and help out 120,000 displaced refugees from the community of Artsakh. It was extraordinary to see the devotion of Boston’s Armenian community of kindred spirits.

The concert, featuring the extraordinary Armenian-born pianist Sergei Babayan, paid tribute to Aram Khachaturian’s 120th and Sergei Rachmaninoff’s 150th anniversaries. The mostly youthful Armenian National Orchestra, conducted by Eduard Topchjan, opened with selections from Khachaturian’s “Spartacus Ballet Suites.” Played with enthusiasm, featuring a multitude of instrumental colors, and rarely performed here, it made for terrific opener. Of the three numbers, Variation of Aegina and Bacchanalia, Adagio of Spartacus and Phrygia, and Dance of Gaditanae-Victory of Spartacus, which was a bit rambunctious, I liked the Adagio best; its lovely oboe solos and a prominent harp accompaniment (some composers know what a harpist/critic likes to hear) gave much pleasure. It was hard not to notice that the concertmaster Karen Tosunyan and most of the strings were youngish women sporting four-inch heels and sparkly tops. The episodes moved by with great commitment, and the audience seemed to be enjoying itself. But the best was yet to come.

The phenomenal Sergei Babayan delivered a sensitive, utterly thrilling performance of Rachmaninoff’s 3rd Piano Concerto (Opus 30), making short work of the sprawling concerto’s technical difficulties. It turns out that this concerto, and Rachmaninoff’s solo piano music, are two of his specialties (check out his take on Rach 3 HERE). I first heard Babayan several years ago on the Celebrity Series of Boston with his former pupil, Daniil Trifonov (who appeared impressively just last week again, on Celebrity Series). But at the duo concert, it was Babayan who captured my attention, and I grabbed the chance to see him live again. While he is hardly a household name, he’s won a slew of competitions, and, to boot, his recent duo partner is the great Martha Argerich. Artist-in-Residence at Cleveland Institute of Music for many years, he has been teaching at Juilliard since 2014. I have resolved never to miss him live, although he is hardly a frequenter of these parts. 

Sergei Babayan

The ultra-virtuosic concerto had a particular moment of fame when it was featured in the movie Shine in which the pianist David Helfgott is driven to madness by the concerto’s technical and emotional demands. Rachmaninoff wrote it for his own formidably gifted self, though he had trouble playing his own cadenza, and later simplified it. After the brief nerve-wracking first few bars, in which the orchestra commenced at a tempo decidedly different than the one Babayan was anticipating, he came in and played magnificently, with perfectly executed dynamics and lyricism, his magisterial technique almost was thrilling as his tender musicality…and he had no trouble with the demanding first version of the cadenza. Next time he is in Boston, RUN to see him!

When other mortals would have been soaking their hands post-concerto in ice water, Babayan returned to play an important short and vanishingly quiet encore by Arvo Pärt. According to my laptop genie, Pärt’s mature style was inaugurated in 1976 with this very piece, “Für Alina,” that remains one of his best-known works. It is governed by the compositional system that he called “tintinnabuli,” derived from the Latin word for “bells.” The tintinnabuli method pairs each note of the melody with a note that comes from a harmonizing chord, so they ring together with bell-like resonance.” I loved my first hearing. A very moving, soul-cleansing piece. Thank you, Mr. Babayan.

Rachmaninoff’s wildly popular, soul-on-his-sleeve Symphony No. 2 in E Minor, Opus 27 is so beloved because one gorgeous tune just morphs into the next glorious and memorable one. Clarinets must live to play their solos in this piece, and the French horns also notably excelled. I often imagine I am listening to Rachmaninoff whispering in my ear, “If you think this tune its fabulous, listen to this!” The ultra-Romantic 3rd Movement felt sluggish, and balances did not always allow the important solos to bloom in the hall (a problem unfortunately frequent under Topchjan’s leadership).

My publisher reports that orchestra encored with an armed-for bears take on Khachaturian’s Masquerade Waltz. Topchjan’s insistent rolling arm gestures kept things moving at warp speed and resounding volume.

It takes a huge, committed community to organize and fundraise something as wonderful as this concert. Due to the generosity of the sponsors, all of the revenue from ticket sales supported the humanitarian needs of the people of Artsakh. I love a community that is there to help its own. This concert provided a perfect example of unity and solidarity.

Turkish Press: Government House of Armenia loses power during Cabinet ministers’ meeting

Anadolu Agency, Turkey
Nov 24 2023
Elena Teslova  |24.11.2023 – Update : 24.11.2023

MOSCOW

The Government House of Armenia in the capital Yerevan suffered a power outage Thursday during a meeting of Cabinet ministers.

The incident occurred while Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan was speaking.

After the lights went out, he went off topic and asked Infrastructure Minister Gnel Sanosyan why he had been unable to ensure stable electricity supply in Armenia.

“How many more instructions do I need to give? I can't give instructions on the same subject for 10 years, can I?” he said.

Pashinyan noted that even in a government building and in the offices of top officials, the lights are constantly flickering, and no one is surprised by the latest power outage.

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/government-house-of-armenia-loses-power-during-cabinet-ministers-meeting/3063230

Armenpress: Armenia fully and unequivocally defends the territorial integrity of Georgia, says Prime Minister

 21:12,

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 24, ARMENPRESS. Armenia fully and unequivocally supports the territorial integrity of Georgia, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has said.

Pashinyan was asked at an online Q&A with the public whether Armenia is ready to recognize Abkhazia and Ossetia as occupied territories.

‘’Armenia's votings in the UN have recorded very visible and certain differences before and after 2019. As a result, the representatives of our brotherly state, Georgia, have expressed their satisfaction.

We fully and unequivocally defend the unity, sovereignty, territorial integrity, independence and democracy of Georgia," the Prime Minister said.

RFE/RL Armenian Service – 11/24/2023

                                        Friday, 


Armenian PM Says ‘State Interests’ Will Matter In Decision On CSTO Membership


Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian (file photo)


Armenia will decide on whether to quit the Collective Security Treaty 
Organization (CSTO) or not “based on its own state interests,” Prime Minister 
Nikol Pashinian said on Friday, answering a question from the public on why 
Yerevan still continues to be a member of the Russia-led defense bloc.

“We will focus on the state interests of Armenia, and if we have made or haven’t 
made any decision at this moment, our benchmark is the state interest of 
Armenia,” he said during almost a nine-hour-long live question-and-answer TV 
broadcast.

“At the moment, our records show that the CSTO’s de-facto actions or inaction do 
not address its obligations towards the Republic of Armenia, that is, in this 
sense, the CSTO’s actions are not in line with Armenia’s interests. And we raise 
this issue in a transparent way,” Pashinian added.

The Pashinian government has long criticized the CSTO for its “failure to 
respond to the security challenges” facing Armenia.

Armenia had appealed to the CSTO for military assistance in September 2022 
following two-day deadly border clashes with Azerbaijan that Yerevan said 
stemmed from Baku’s aggression against sovereign Armenian territory.

The Russia-led bloc stopped short of calling Azerbaijan the aggressor and 
effectively refused to back Armenia militarily, while agreeing to consider only 
sending an observation mission to the South Caucasus country.

Armenia later declined such a mission, saying that before it could be carried 
out the CSTO needed to give a clear political assessment of what Yerevan had 
described as Azerbaijan’s aggression and occupation of sovereign Armenian 
territory.

Speculation about Armenia’s possible withdrawal from the CSTO was stoked by 
Pashinian’s most recent decision not to attend the organization’s November 23 
summit in Minsk, Belarus, which drew criticism from Moscow.

Political analyst Areg Kochinian said Pashinian’s step and his remarks on Friday 
were not yet “withdrawal” from the CSTO, but rather a preparation for it.

“One should not overestimate this boycott like some do in the media, calling it 
an effective withdrawal from the CSTO. But, of course, this is essentially the 
way towards change, the way of preparation for making some qualitative changes 
in the security architecture of Armenia to quit the CSTO,” the analyst said.




Nagorno-Karabakh Leader Testifies In 2020 War Probe


Leader of Nagorno-Karabakh Samvel Shahramanian (file photo)


Samvel Shahramanian, the leader of Nagorno-Karabakh, testified in front of an 
Armenian parliament commission probing the 2020 war that met on Friday behind 
closed doors to hear the unrecognized republic’s last president.

Andranik Kocharian, the head of the commission, said that, among other things, 
during his three-hour-long testimony Shahramanian also shed light on some of the 
events that followed Azerbaijan’s latest military operation in Nagorno-Karabakh 
on September 19-20 that led to the exodus of more than 100,000 Armenians, the 
region’s virtually entire Armenian population, to Armenia.

Shahramanian, who was elected president by Nagorno-Karabakh’s parliament on 
September 9, only ten days before Azerbaijan’s offensive, signed a decree on 
September 28 disbanding the “Nagorno-Karabakh Republic” from January 1, 2024, 
which he later hinted was done under pressure from Azerbaijan to allow a safe 
escape for the local ethnic Armenian population to Armenia.

Andranik Kocharian

Kocharian said that Shahramanian was also asked about he managed to safely reach 
Armenia on board a helicopter while Nagorno-Karabakh’s eight former and current 
officials, including three former presidents, were arrested by Azerbaijan and 
now face grave charges in Baku.

Among the questions were also those about the fuel depot explosion on September 
25 as a result of which hundreds of people were killed and injured.

“Some realities were revealed to me that no one would have been entitled to 
receive information about on another platform,” said the head of the commission 
that is due to complete its investigation on December 3.

Kocharian said that Shahramanian’s testimony will be reflected in the final 
conclusions of the commission to be presented in a report due next year.

Kocharian said that before completing its work the commission also expects to 
question one of Nagorno-Karabakh’s former military commanders who was in charge 
of the Hadrut unit. He said that former Secretary of Nagorno-Karabakh’s Security 
Council Samvel Babayan has himself expressed a desire to testify before the 
commission.

Kocharian said that there was a legal obstacle to questioning Jalal Harutiunian, 
who led the Nagorno-Karabakh defense army during most of the 2020 war, as he is 
now facing criminal charges as part of a war-related investigation.

Journalists did not have an opportunity to ask questions to Shahramanian, who 
had entered the investigative commission room unnoticed and almost unnoticed 
left after the meeting ended.




Armenia Eyes Debt Reduction After Paying Russia For Undelivered Weapons


Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian answers questions sent in by the public, 
.


Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian said Yerevan was looking for options to 
reduce its outstanding financial debt to Russia by using the payments it has 
made for weapons that Moscow has failed to deliver.

Pashinian made the remarks on November 24 during a live question-and-answer TV 
broadcast with the public when he was asked about weapons that Armenia had 
purchased from Russia but that were never delivered.

Earlier, Pashinian and other Armenian officials talked about “hundreds of 
millions of dollars” transferred to Moscow as part of arms purchase contracts 
that remained unfulfilled amid Russia’s continuing war against Ukraine.

One citizen asked Pashinian why his government would not consider the reversal 
of a controversial deal that Russia made with Armenia in the early 2000s to take 
possession of some of Armenia’s lucrative strategic assets in exchange for the 
South Caucasus nation’s debt.

The Armenian premier gave no figures, but again confirmed that there were 
problems with Russia’s fulfilling its arms contracts with Armenia.

He said reducing Armenia’s debt to Russia could be one of the mechanisms of 
settling the issue, but said there were other options as well.

“We know that Russia itself needs weapons. In this context, we expect to settle 
this issue in a routine working manner. I hope that our discussions will lead to 
concrete results,” Pashinian said.

Armenia has long been a close ally of Russia but – angered in part by what it 
saw as a lack of support from Moscow during the 2020 war in Nagorno-Karabakh and 
subsequent border clashes with Azerbaijan – has in recent months taken steps to 
distance itself from that alliance.

Armenia drew criticism from Moscow earlier this month after Pashinian said he 
would not attend the Russian-led Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) 
in Minsk, Belarus.

Other Armenian officials also declined to participate in events held by the 
CSTO, which also includes Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan, but a 
senior official in Yerevan on November 23 said Armenia nevertheless is not 
considering quitting the CSTO.




Armenia Says Azerbaijan Still Vague On Commitment To Peace


Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian answers questions sent in by the public, 
.


Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian said on Friday that it still remains unclear 
whether Azerbaijan will ultimately commit to signing a peace agreement with 
Armenia based on the three principles that he said were agreed upon during 
negotiations mediated by the European Union.

Answering questions sent in by the public during a live TV broadcast, Pashinian 
referred to his meetings with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev that were held 
with the mediation of European Council President Charles Michel in May and July.

The Armenian premier reiterated the three principles, including mutual 
recognition of territorial integrity and borders, border delimitation based on a 
1991 declaration signed by a dozen former Soviet republics, including Armenia 
and Azerbaijan, after the collapse of the USSR, and the sovereign jurisdictions 
of the states over transportation links passing through their territories.

“Now we cannot say with certainty that Azerbaijan refuses to sign a peace 
agreement based on these three principles, but we cannot say with certainty that 
Azerbaijan reaffirms its commitment to these three principles either. There is a 
need to clarify these issues and nuances during the negotiations,” Pashinian.

Azerbaijan appears to have avoided Western platforms for negotiations with 
Armenia after Azerbaijani forces recaptured the whole of Nagorno-Karabakh in a 
one-day military operation on September 19, causing more than 100,000 people, 
virtually the entire local Armenian population, to flee to Armenia.

Pashinian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev were scheduled to meet on the 
sidelines of the EU’s October 5 summit in Granada, Spain, for talks mediated by 
French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, and European 
Council President Charles Michel.

European Council President Charles Michel hosts talks between Armenian Prime 
Minister Nikol Pashinian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev in Brussels, May 
14, 2023.

Pashinian had hoped that they would sign there a document laying out the main 
parameters of an Armenian-Azerbaijani peace treaty. However, Aliyev withdrew 
from the talks at the last minute.

Baku cited France’s allegedly “biased position” against Azerbaijan as the reason 
for skipping those talks in Spain.

The Azerbaijani leader also appears to have canceled another meeting which the 
EU’s Michel planned to host in Brussels in late October.

Most recently Azerbaijan refused to attend a meeting with Armenia at the level 
of foreign ministers in Washington after allegedly “one-sided and biased” 
remarks by a senior U.S. official made during a congressional hearing on 
Nagorno-Karabakh. That meeting had reportedly been scheduled to take place on 
November 20.

In doing so Azerbaijan recently offered to hold direct talks with Armenia, 
including at the Armenian-Azerbaijani border.

Pashinian reaffirmed today that a meeting of the two countries’ officials 
engaged in border delimitation and demarcation activities will be held at a yet 
undisclosed location along the state frontier on November 30.

He said that Yerevan will draw conclusions from those discussions as to whether 
“Azerbaijan is ready for peace based on those principles or whether Azerbaijan 
rejects those principles.”

“We don’t have that confidence until today,” Pashinian said.

The Armenian leader did not say whether Yerevan also considers direct 
negotiations with Azerbaijan at the highest level.

On Thursday, Armenia’s Deputy Foreign Minister Mnatsakan Safarian said that 
there are issues in negotiations “where the presence of mediators is mandatory 
and plays a very important role.”

“For example, issues related to the rights of the population forcibly displaced 
from Nagorno-Karabakh. The existence of international mechanisms is important 
here. There are also other issues where guarantees are important,” the senior 
Armenian diplomat said.

Armenia’s former President Serzh Sarkisian, meanwhile, warned that Yerevan 
should not engage in direct talks with Baku. He said such a format will deadlock 
the negotiation process.

Former Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian

He also warned that a peace agreement foisted on Armenia will also amount to a 
“surrender.”

Sarkisian claimed that if Pashinian is going to sign a peace agreement with 
Azerbaijan the way “as we see it now,” it will make him a “double capitulant” 
after the “surrender” that the ex-president alleged Pashinian signed in 2020 to 
stop the war in Nagorno-Karabakh.

“Because unjust peace is a reason for a new war,” Sarkisian said.

Pashinian and members of his political team routinely deny that the 
Russia-brokered 2020 ceasefire agreement with Azerbaijan amounted to a 
surrender. They, in turn, accuse Sarkisian and his predecessor Robert Kocharian 
of being the ones who paved the way for the military defeat in Nagorno-Karabakh 
by leaving a legacy of conflict and a “corruption-stricken” army and state to 
their government.




Armenia ‘To Consider’ Joining Documents Adopted By CSTO Summit It Skipped


Russia’s President Vladimir Putin (second from right) posing for a family photo 
with leaders of the Collective Security Treaty Organization during a summit not 
attended by Armenia. Minsk, Belarus, .


Armenia will consider whether to accede to the documents adopted as a result of 
the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) summit that it did not 
attend, a Foreign Ministry spokesperson in Yerevan said.

“We will consider the documents adopted as a result of the sessions of the CSTO 
statutory bodies… and, taking into account the procedures existing within the 
CSTO framework, the issue of Armenia’s accession to them,” Ani Badalian told the 
news program of Armenia’s Public Television late on Thursday.

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and other Armenian officials refused to go to 
Minsk to participate in the November 22-23 sessions hosted by Belarusian leader 
Alyaksandr Lukashenka and his government and attended by leaders and 
representatives of four other former Soviet countries, including Russian 
President Vladimir Putin.

According to officials in Yerevan, Armenia’s absence from the summit was due to 
the CSTO’s “failure to respond to the security challenges” facing the South 
Caucasus nation.

Armenia had appealed to the CSTO for military assistance in September 2022 
following two-day deadly border clashes with Azerbaijan that Yerevan said 
stemmed from Baku’s aggression against sovereign Armenian territory.

The Russia-led bloc stopped short of calling Azerbaijan the aggressor and 
effectively refused to back Armenia militarily, while agreeing to consider only 
sending an observation mission to the South Caucasus country.

Armenia later declined such a mission, saying that before it could be carried 
out the CSTO needed to give a clear political assessment of what Yerevan had 
described as Azerbaijan’s aggression and occupation of sovereign Armenian 
territory.

This week’s summit of the Russia-led defense bloc discussed “urgent problems of 
international and regional security” and made a number of decisions, including 
the approval of a new provision on the order of response of the CSTO to crisis 
situations and on the order of adoption and implementation of collective 
decisions on the use of forces.

The summit also approved the appointment of Russian Colonel General Andrei 
Serdyukov to the post of the head of the Joint Staff of the CSTO and a 
regulation on the joint press center of the CSTO.

Belarusian Foreign Minister Syarhey Aleynyk acknowledged before the leaders of 
Belarus, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan gathered for the summit 
that Armenia’s absence meant the lack of a quorum, but he told journalists that 
all the decisions approved would be “absolutely legitimate.”

Aleynyk said he had discussed “issues and mechanisms for approving decisions” 
with Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan in a phone call. The Belarusian 
minister said that according to the CSTO rules, all decisions are made in 
consultation with all countries.

“We agreed that after the summit, the secretary-general of the CSTO will visit 
Yerevan. And, of course, we will pass all the decisions that were finalized here 
as part of the conciliation commission to our Armenian partners. And we will 
count on them to join us,” Aleynyk said.




Private Remittances To Armenia Dwindle In 2023

        • Robert Zargarian


The net amount of private remittances entering Armenia has decreased by more 
than 20 percent, standing at some $1.3 billion in the first nine months of this 
year, the latest statistical data shows.

In January-September 2022, the net inflow of money to Armenia was about $1.8 
billion.

According to experts, this decline shows that the positive influence of the 
influx of Russians and their money on the economy of Armenia after Russia’s 
invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 is weakening.

“Demand-driven economic growth was also at the expense of the tripling of 
remittances, but this has become less of a factor, and, unfortunately, 
predictions about that are coming true and now the opposite is happening,” said 
Tadevos Avetisian, a member of the opposition Hayastan faction in the Armenian 
parliament.

Avetisian also said last year that those flows had external reasons and were not 
the result of the government’s activities, a view not entirely shared by 
Armenian officials.

According to the economist, the money that rapidly flow in also tend to rapidly 
flow out. “Now we are already at this stage, and this outflow of money puts 
stress on the economic processes as well,” he said.

According to the data of the Central Bank, money inflows to Armenia increased 
significantly in April 2022, some two months after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine 
that triggered a war that still continues between the two countries today.

It was during that period that the influx of Russians fleeing Western sanctions, 
reprisals or later the military draft began.

The net amount of private remittances to Armenia was steadily increasing for a 
year, but began to show an opposite trend since March of this year when more 
money started to flow out of Armenia.

And although the amount of money sent from abroad continues to be relatively 
large, the amount of funds leaving Armenia has increased significantly. Of the 
nearly $4,3 million that entered Armenia in the form of private remittances in 
January-September 2023, some $3 billion have already left. In the same period of 
2022, almost twice less, $1.7 billion, left Armenia.

According to Avetisian, last year’s large cash inflow was mostly not capitalized 
in Armenia, the money was not turned into investments and remained on bank 
accounts. Now, he said, this money is leaving.

“To put it figuratively, that money came to Armenia and hid here for a while, 
and now it is leaving Armenia due to new geopolitical realities. In other words, 
the hot money effect is when people withdraw their capitals from a country where 
there is a possibility of a military conflict,” the economist said.

Statistics shows that the lion’s share of the outflow of money from Armenia goes 
to Russia and the United States. This year people in Armenia have already wired 
half a billion dollars in private remittances to Russia, almost twice as much as 
in the same period of 2022. A total of $323 million was transferred to the 
United States during nine months, which is by nearly 60 percent more than last 
year.

According to economist Suren Parsian, in order to keep the money in Armenia, 
first a favorable investment environment should be created to attract those who 
have money so that they do not look for options in other countries.

“We must have a developed stock exchange where people can, for example, buy 
shares, bonds, and also have the opportunity to start a business in Armenia. 
There should be such an environment so that they can implement their ideas and 
projects here,” Parsian said.

Acknowledging external factors behind the influx of money into Armenia in 2022, 
the Armenian government has not shared the opposition’s view that it was 
entirely due to those factors that people came and brought their money to the 
country. Officials have pointed to efforts of the Armenian government to create 
an appropriate climate and business opportunities in Armenia.

At a weekly cabinet session on Thursday Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian 
touted his government’s success in setting a new record in terms of registered 
jobs in the country.

Pashinian said that around 183,000 new jobs have been created in Armenia, a 
country with a population of some 3 million people, since he first became prime 
minister in May 2018. The current number of registered jobs in Armenia, he said, 
stands at 730,000.



Reposted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2023 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 

Central Bank of Armenia: exchange rates and prices of precious metals – 24-11-23

 17:07,

YEREVAN, 24 NOVEMBER, ARMENPRESS. The Central Bank of Armenia informs “Armenpress” that today, 24 November, USD exchange rate down by 0.07 drams to 402.18 drams. EUR exchange rate down by 0.44 drams to 438.74 drams. Russian Ruble exchange rate down by 0.04 drams to 4.52 drams. GBP exchange rate up by 0.60 drams to 505.34 drams.

The Central Bank has set the following prices for precious metals.

Gold price down by 65.27 drams to 25768.32 drams. Silver price down by 2.38 drams to 305.87 drams.

Armenia didn’t veto CSTO decisions at Belarus summit despite not attending

 17:05,

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 23, ARMENPRESS. Armenia did not veto the documents that were adopted during the CSTO summit in Belarus which it did not attend, Belarus State Secretary of the Security Council Alexander Volfovich has said.

He said that the documents were agreed upon beforehand.

The Belarusian foreign minister, Sergei Aleinik, confirmed that CSTO decisions are made by consensus. “I have had a telephone conversation with my Armenian counterpart Ararat Mirzoyan. We discussed, among other things, these issues and decision-making mechanisms. All decisions that will be made today will be absolutely legitimate. In accordance with the rules and procedures of the organization, all decisions are made by consensus of all member countries. We agreed that following the summit, the CSTO secretary general will visit Yerevan. And, naturally, we will forward all the decisions finalized here within the framework of the conciliation commission to our Armenian partners. And we will count on them to join these decisions,” BelTA quoted him as saying.

The impact of the Israeli conflict on the situation in the region. Will Azerbaijan start a war?

Nov 23 2023
  • Armine Martirosyan
  • Yerevan

Will there be a war

Overlapping conflicts are increasingly complicating and aggravating the world situation. New conflicts divert the attention of the international community from the old ones. And all countries are watching processes seemingly distant from them. Political analysts consider the Arab-Israeli conflict, which flared up again on the background of the Ukrainian conflict, and the last one – on the background of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict, as links in the chain of world processes.

Armenian analysts comment on how the Palestinian-Israeli conflict may affect the South Caucasus region and whether Baku will use this situation to invade Armenia.


  • “Yerevan should reject this proposal”: opinion on direct talks with Baku
  • A new stage of Armenian-British cooperation. What is behind it?
  • “Take aid to Armenia off the agenda” – Yerevan’s appeal to the CSTO

“I do not see any special opportunities for the influence of another round of the Arab-Israeli conflict on the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict. This is evidenced by the statements made from Washington, Brussels and now also from London. The agenda of the collective West as the main moderator of the settlement of the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan does not change in connection with the Arab-Israeli war.

The situation in the Gaza Strip, first of all, affects Iran as a country directly involved in this conflict. But still not to the extent that it makes Tehran completely distract from the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict, which poses a threat to itself as well.

And Israel is actively using Azerbaijan as an observation, reconnaissance and, in the future, possibly even military bridgehead. So Iran cannot lose sight of the development of the situation in the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict”.

“Baku can attack Armenia always and at any moment, but the situation in the Gaza Strip is not the kind of conflict that can make international actors ignore it.

In global politics, regional boundaries have long been blurred, and the same US considers the South Caucasus as part of the Middle East. But the issue is not geography, but the essence of this conflict.

The conflict that is unfolding today between Israel and Hamas is elaborate. It is based on the far-reaching calculations of Israel, as well as the U.S. that supports it. It is the destruction of Hamas.

Hamas is a Palestinian Islamist movement and political party. Controls the Gaza Strip in Palestine.

This conflict is manageable. The same Iran – even at the level of Hezbollah – limits itself to diplomacy and statements, and in reality does nothing to prevent Israel from gradually and methodically destroying Hamas.

Hezbollah is a Lebanese paramilitary organization and political party advocating the establishment of an Islamic state in Lebanon modeled on Iran.

Iran understands the risks of the war going beyond the Gaza Strip, given the possible intervention of the United States, which has already sent its aircraft carriers to the Mediterranean Sea to the shores of Israel and Lebanon.

Any conflict is manageable, including ours. The other day, US Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs James O’Brien said very clearly that the US is closely monitoring all military movements of Azerbaijani equipment on the border.

So at this stage, attacking Armenia would be a shot in the foot for Aliyev. Aliyev will simply take the path of Saddam Hussein. He understands this perfectly well and is trying to build his claims against Armenia on other possibilities, along other lines. In particular, Aliyev has started making claims against France, accuses Armenia of revanchism, etc.”.

“Any conflict can make adjustments in other regions. Say, the ongoing Ukrainian conflict has affected the situation around the world, especially in the post-Soviet space.

For example, preparations for the war in Ukraine included a 44-day war in Artsakh, which Russia calls a “successfully conducted operation.”

Moscow wanted to act according to the same scenario in Ukraine, but the first stage of this, as they call it, “operation” failed, and much in their plans has changed.

Russia partially ceded its positions in the South Caucasus to Turkey on the condition that Ankara would remain neutral in Ukraine. Which it is doing. Turkey’s actions do not go further than rare condemnations of Moscow for its invasion of Ukraine.

But the failure of the first stage of the war in Ukraine, when Russian troops had to retreat from under Kiev and withdraw from the central regions to the south and east, accelerated Russia’s withdrawal from the South Caucasus as well. This automatically increased Turkey’s influence in the region. Turkey, by continuing to cooperate with Russia in various areas, including gas re-export, is gradually squeezing Russia out of the South Caucasus”.

“The attitude towards Armenia in the world has changed. If Armenia in 2020 was perceived as an ally of Russia, even a satellite, dependent on Moscow and not a sovereign state, today the West’s attitude towards Armenia is changing before our eyes. Today, the West considers Yerevan a partner and possible ally in future stages, and this is stated directly.

The adoption of the “Armenia Protection Act of 2023″ by the U.S. Senate speaks volumes. Supportive statements were made by the European Parliament and the European Commission. France, India and a number of other states have started military-technical cooperation”.

“Israel is a state in which incredible resources have been invested over the years. And the position of the U.S. political elite as the main player in the region is well known – the destruction of the closest ally of the United States cannot be allowed.

At some point, the West shifted its attention to the Israeli conflict, which caused some confusion among the political leadership of Ukraine. But today the Biden administration is trying to be present in solving both problems. It is providing military-technical as well as financial assistance to both at the same time.

The expansion of the Israeli war may have risks for us. But I see no possibility of that with the presence and presence of American aircraft carriers and ballistic missile submarines in the Mediterranean.

This is an absolutely clear signal to all players in the region that the involvement of third forces will not be tolerated and there should be no expansion of the war.

Of course, Baku could take advantage of the fact that the attention of the international community is focused on other conflicts and attack Armenia. For the decision to attack has already been made, it is only a question of timing and details.

However, the actions of the U.S., EU and France have made it very clear to Aliyev that in case of such a development of events Azerbaijan will find itself in the status of a state hostile to the West.

I do not think that Aliyev’s regime at this stage is ready to pay such a price, to become a country hostile to the Western world, to ally itself with Russia, North Korea, Belarus. The elite formed around Aliyev should reflect and realize the consequences of their actions”.

“As long as the Aliyev regime exists and as long as its backbone has not been broken, the threat of war will always be there. But Armenia, which lags behind Azerbaijan in terms of military-political balance, must also rebuild its forces.

From the moment Azerbaijan realizes that an attack on Armenia will cost it enormously, we can say that the threat of war is negligible. Today this price does not seem to them to be incredible.

The actions of the US, EU, France, India are aimed at buying time and restoring this balance of power in the region.

We are given time to restore the military-political balance in the region with the help of the West and other friendly countries.

Exactly military-political, because issues are decided not only by the number of weapons, but also by alliances, ties, pacts in which you participate, participation in international economic projects, etc.

And we only have two or three years to do that. Two or three years to do our homework. So that later on, even if the world switches to other problems, we will be able to resist Azerbaijan’s aggression, because it will always have plans to attack Armenia. This is such a country.

https://jam-news.net/will-azerbaijan-armenia-war-start/