CIS official arrival in Armenia not linked with opposition moves

ITAR-TASS News Agency
TASS
April 8, 2004 Thursday

CIS official arrival in Armenia not linked with opposition moves

By Tigran Liloyan

YEREVAN

Nikolai Bordyuzha, the secretary-general of the Collective Security
Treaty Organisation, denied assertions that his arrival in Armenia is
linked with the fact that the local opposition stepped up its
activities.

Bordyuzha said in an exclusive interview to Tass upon his arrival
that the Collective Security Treaty Organisations is not going to
interfere in the events in Yerevan. “This will be decided by
political instruments, not by clashes,” Bordyuzha believes.

The opposition that became more active in the recent days urges the
Armenian authorities to fulfil the decision of the country’s
Constitutional Court, made last year, about a referendum on the vote
of confidence for the president. The opposition convenes a “national
rally” on Friday, wishing to compel the president to resign.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armenia govt has enough legal means to curb extremism

ITAR-TASS News Agency
TASS
April 8, 2004 Thursday

Armenia govt has enough legal means to curb extremism

By Tigran Liloyan

YEREVAN

The Armenian government has enough legal means to curb political
extremism in Armenia, President Robert Kocharyan said in an interview
to Armenian public television on Thursday.

“The opposition must be careful or else its actions can boomerang on
it,” the president warned. He believes people will not tolerate
provocations. Wisdom will help them make the right appraisal of the
situation.

Kocharyan understands “the indignation of those who elected him when
they constantly hear members of the opposition say that the backbone
of power must be broken, that blood must be spilt”.

He called on his supporters “to show restraint and ignore
provocations of the opposition”. “People have elected me, so I should
fulfil their expectations, not the vice versa”. “People have
authorised me to use levers of power to ensure law and order in the
country,” the president said. He believes opposing one part of the
people to the other would be “the worst scenario”.

The president “gets the impression” he “became the target for the
competing leaders of the opposition”. He said the situation would
ease as soon as the opposition, the “aggressive political minority”,
names its leader.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Burbank Parade Set for April 24, but Future Events May Be Shifted

City News Service
April 7, 2004 Wednesday

Burbank Parade Set for April 24, but Future Events May Be Shifted

BURBANK

The annual Burbank on Parade celebration will take place April 24 as
scheduled, but organizers agreed to shift future events to avoid a
day that marks a dark period in Armenian history. In mid-February,
members of the Burbank on Parade organizing committee scheduled the
parade for a Saturday that falls this year on Armenian Genocide
Remembrance Day. For the Armenian community, April 24 is a solemn day
commemorating the slaughter of 1.5 million Armenians by the Ottoman
Turkish Empire from 1915-23. Many of Burbank’s estimated 10,000
Armenian-Americans will not join the 23rd annual parade because they
will spend the day at homes, churches or rallies. But the event, a
celebration of the local community traditionally held the last
Saturday in April, cannot be rescheduled this year because of the
challenge of coordinating youth bands, drill teams, equestrian
entries and representatives from local organizations, event
coordinators said. In an attempt to avoid future conflicts, Burbank
Vice Mayor Marsha Ramos organized an informal meeting last week
between representatives of the city’s Armenian community and parade
organizers. “I believe the goal of this meeting was to allow everyone
to have a better understanding of the importance of April 24 to the
Armenian community,” Ramos said. “I felt it was important that people
meet face to face in order to facilitate a dialogue, and to foster
and strengthen community. “I believe we accomplished that goal
Thursday night. We plan to build on this first meeting and meet again
some time in May,” she said. Those attending the meeting agreed
future parade dates would be selected so they do not conflict with
Armenian Genocide commemorations. Joanne Miller chairs this year’s
parade effort. “The parade has been the same weekend for the 23 years
of its existence,” she said. “It’s extremely unfortunate that the two
events coincide this year. We have committed to an alternate and
permanent solution in the future to work better for everyone in our
community,” she said.

Viktor Dallaqyan Arrested

A1 Plus | 15:02:38 | 08-04-2004 | Politics |

VIKTOR DALLAQYAN ARRESTED

This morning the Armenian law-enforcement bodies have invited MP and
“Justice” Bloc Secretary Viktor Dallaqyan to the department under the
pretext of having a talk.

He went to the department as a sufferer in connection with the recent attack
in the street. Under inaccurate information, Dallaqyan was arrested. We will
inform about the details during the day.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Prompt Response Group on Human Rights Protection

A1 Plus | 20:39:14 | 08-04-2004 | Social |

PROMPT RESPONSE GROUP ON HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION

A prompt response group for human rights protection was formed in Armenia.

Free Tribune for Civil Initiatives, Civil Society Institute, Helsinki
Committee of Armenia, Caucasus Center for Peacemaking Initiatives, Helsinki
Citizens` Assembly Vanadzor Office, Speech Freedom Support Fund, Journalists
‘ Club “Asparez” Gyumri, have decided to establish such a group.

The organizations have made the above decision since they assess the
situation in the country as a state terror and intention to create fearful
atmosphere in the republic.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Oriental rugs

Newark Star Ledger, NJ
April 8 2004

Oriental rugs
Thursday, April 08, 2004
BY BETH D’ADDONO

Nothing finishes off a room like an Oriental rug. Hand-made and
carefully crafted, each one has a story to tell and can speak volumes
against your polished hardwood floors and favorite furnishings.

Whether a rug is the finest heirloom quality silk or has more humble
beginnings, it still can add style and flair to just about any room.

There are literally hundreds of styles of rugs from exotic places
like Turkey, India, Iran and Tibet, but choosing an Oriental rug
doesn’t have to be one of the inscrutable mysteries of the Far East.

“Don’t let the names confuse you,” said Paul Mobasseri, the
Iranian-born manager of Oriental Rug Weavers Outlet in Green Brook.
“Each rug is named, not for the place where it’s made, but for the
village where its original design comes from — places like Bijar and
Tabriz in Persia, now known as Iran. But the important thing is to
look at a lot of rugs and then buy what you like.”

Buying a fine Oriental is like introducing a piece of history and
culture to your home. The tradition of rug weaving is a rich one.
Fragments of flat-woven carpets have been discovered in ancient
Egyptian tombs, dating back some 4000 years. The weaving of pile rugs
is generally associated with nomadic sheep-herding tribes in the
Middle East and parts of central Asia, long before 2000 B.C. “The
rearing of sheep, the prime source of carpet wool, is a traditional
nomad occupation,” according to the Web site “Add to
this the necessity of thick coverings for people having to endure
extreme cold, and it’s likely the craft of weaving developed to
replace the use of rough animal skins for warmth.”

What started out of necessity continued as a reflection of cultural
tradition and aesthetics. Antique Persian rugs are generally the most
expensive on the market, but many Persian designs are being produced
successfully elsewhere in the world, especially India. Everything
from the quality of the wool and density of the weave — counted by
the number of knots tied per square-inch — to the type of dye and
detail of design influences a rug’s value.

Depending on its quality, a 6 x 9-foot rug can take 3,000 man-hours
to produce, which accounts for higher prices on some types of
Oriental rugs.

In general, silk rugs are the most expensive, followed by a mixture
of silk and wool and 100 percent wool, which are considered the most
durable.

At Oriental Rug Weavers Outlet, prices can range from $850 to $20,000
for an 8 x 10 rug, depending on the quality of the wool, sharpness of
the design and density of the pile.

“A beautiful Oriental rug adds tremendous character to a room,” said
Marilee Schempp of Design I in Summit. Schempp recently redid a
dining room for a client in Chatham, using a 9 x 12 $12,600 Tibetan
rug from Tufenkian Carpets in Hackensack as the room’s anchor and
touchstone for color.

How do you know what size rug to buy? Mobasseri recommends using a
sheet or newspapers as a pattern, trying the dimensions on for size
until it looks right in the space. If you’re buying a rug for the
dining room, anticipate a four-foot border around the table, allowing
chairs to stay on the rug at all times. A reputable rug dealer will
let you bring a rug home to try in your room for a day or two. This
is truly the only way you’ll know for sure if the rug is for you.
About the only rule when it comes to placing an Oriental rug in a
room is that generally you want to center a rug with a prominent
center medallion. Other than that, rugs can complement existing
prints or other runs in adjacent rooms. Colors should harmonize, but
patterns don’t have to match for a rug style to work.

“Once you’ve established your budget, then it’s just a matter of
finding a rug that you fall in love with,” said Joyce Gibson, manager
for Tufenkian Carpets’ Hackensack showroom. Gibson recommends
building a room around a rug, instead of trying to match a rug to
existing paint color and furnishings.

In general, rugs with curving or curvilinear designs enhance formal
and traditional room settings, while geometric patterns work well in
more rustic or modern décor. Tufenkian Carpets specializes in rugs
produced in Tibet and Armenia, including commissioned designs by
Barbara Barry, Clodagh, Kevin Walz and Vincente Wolf. Company founder
James Tufenkian, produces most of the rug patterns, inspired by
traditional designs.

Prices for an 8 x 10 can range from $2,200 up to $13,000 and up. If
you want to spend more, you can also custom design a rug to fit your
world — a feature that has turned celebs like Goldie Hawn and Kelsey
Grammer into Tufenkian customers.

Once you’re ready to shop, spend some time at several different rug
stores, comparing styles and quality. Check out the price range for
the style of rug that you love most. Patronize an established and
reputable store that offers a wide variety of styles and price ranges
and will allow you to take a rug home to try out in the room.

What you don’t want to do is go cross-eyed counting the knots on the
back of the rug. “Don’t get caught in the knot count trap,” said
Gibson. “Some rug designs demand a looser, coarser weave. In general,
the higher the knot count, the more detail in the design. But the
bottom line is the value of good design and color and what you fall
in love with — that’s what ultimately sells a rug.”

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

www.rugman.com.

BAKU: CoE secretary gen. approves relations with Milli Majlis

Azer Tag, Azerbaijan State Info Agency
April 8 2004

COE SECRETARY GENERAL APPROVES RELATIONS WITH MILLI MAJLIS
[April 08, 2004, 15:37:14]

Chairman of the Milli Majlis Murtuz Alasgarov met Council of Europe
Secretary General Walter Schwimmer, who is staying in Azerbaijan on
an official visit, April 7. He expressed to the guest his gratitude
for the support his organization has been providing for Azerbaijan to
integrate into Europe. The Chairman reminded that after joining the
Council of Europe, Azerbaijan has signed over 40 Conventions,
protocols and other documents of this structure. He pointed out as
well that Azerbaijan had passed a number of laws concerning human
rights protection, established Ombudsman institute and Constitutional
Court, as well as had drawn up the draft Law `On Tele- and Radio
Broadcasting’ and submitted it for European experts’ consideration.

Chairman Murtuz Alasgarov let the COE Secretary General know that the
Parliament has recently passed the Law `On Fight against Corruption’,
while a number of other ones are now under intensive elaboration, and
pointed out that Azerbaijan had been conscientiously honoring its
commitments to the Council of Europe.

The parties as well touched upon the political prisoners’ issue. It
was mentioned that under the Decrees of Pardon issued by nationwide
leader of Azerbaijan Heydar Aliyev and the Head of State Ilham
Aliyev, the important steps had been taken to discharge those whom
the Council of Europe called political prisoners. As a result of the
32 Decrees on Pardon issued in 1995-2003 by President Heydar Aliyev,
and 7 laws on amnesty passed by the Milli Majlis, 716 have been
discharged, and cases of 11 are now under court examination.
According to the Chairman, for the short period, President Ilham
Aliyev has issued two Decrees on Pardon of December 2003 and March 17
2004 discharging over 100 men. Therefore, Azerbaijan has fulfilled
its commitment to the Council Europe.

The meeting also focused on the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over
Nagorno-Karabakh. Mr. Murtuz Alasgarov pointed out with regret the
same approach by some international organizations to both aggressor
and subject of the aggression, displaying double standards policy on
the issue. He reminded on destruction of Azerbaijan cultural
monuments and over 900 populated areas.

COE Secretary General Walter Schwimmer has given appositive
assessment to the relations between the Milli Majlis and the Council
of Europe saying the goal of the organization was to render necessary
assistance to Azerbaijan. He pointed out the recommendations of the
Venice Commission and OSCE Bureau of Democratic Institutions and
Human Rights concerning the Election Code, and expressed hope that
Azerbaijan would make use of the recommendations during Parliamentary
elections to be held in Azerbaijan in November 2005.

Mr. Schwimmer noted that one of the main Council of Europe’s clauses
is indepencence of mass media and freedom of expression, and welcomed
the law on alternative military service to be shortly passed in
Azerbaijan.

He noted as well that he had always welcomed the Decrees on Pardon
issued by President Heydar Aliyev, and stressed the two new Decrees
signed by the Head of Azerbaija Ilham Aliyev created good basis for
the independent experts to complete their reports.

The COE Secretary General announced he was going to visit one of the
encampments, and that existence of over 1 million refugees terrified
him. He expressed opinion that the issue must be in the constant
focus of the Europe’s attention, `The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is
the problem of not only Azerbaijan or region but also the whole
Europe,’ he said. Mr. Schwimmer stressed that this conflict
contradicted the principles of the Council of Europe.

F18News: Turkmenistan – Religious freedom survey, April 2004

FORUM 18 NEWS SERVICE, Oslo, Norway

The right to believe, to worship and witness
The right to change one’s belief or religion
The right to join together and express one’s belief

=================================================

Wednesday 7 April 2004
TURKMENISTAN: RELIGIOUS FREEDOM SURVEY, APRIL 2004

In its survey analysis of the religious freedom situation in Turkmenistan,
Forum 18 News Service reports on the almost complete lack of freedom to
practice any faith, apart from very limited freedom for Sunni Islam and
Russian Orthodox Christianity with a small number of registered places of
worship and constant interference and control by the state. This is despite
recent legal changes that in theory allow minority communities to register.
All other communities – Baptist, Pentecostal, Adventist, Lutheran and other
Protestants, as well as Shia Muslim, Armenian Apostolic, Jewish, Baha’i,
Jehovah’s Witness and Hare Krishna – are currently banned and their
activity punishable under the administrative or criminal law. Religious
meetings have been broken up, with raids in March on Jehovah’s Witnesses
and a Baha’i even as the government was proclaiming a new religious policy.
Believers have been threatened, detained, beaten, fined and sacked from
their jobs, while homes used for worship and religious literature have been
confiscated. Although some minority communities have sought information on
how to register under the new procedures, none has so far applied to
register. It remains very doubtful that Turkmenistan will in practice allow
religious faiths to be practiced freely.

TURKMENISTAN: RELIGIOUS FREEDOM SURVEY, APRIL 2004

By Felix Corley, Forum 18 News Service

Despite legal changes in March that – at least theoretically –
allow minority religious communities to register for the first time since
1997, Turkmenistan retains one of the harshest systems of state control
over religious life of any of the former Soviet republics. Under the highly
restrictive 1996 religion law, only two religious faiths were able to gain
registration: communities of the state-sanctioned Sunni Muslim Board and
the Russian Orthodox Church. Amendments to the religion law enacted in
October 2003 made all unregistered religious activity de jure illegal and a
criminal offence. Unregistered religious activity was already being de
facto treated as criminal activity. Baptist, Pentecostal, Adventist,
Lutheran and other Protestant churches, as well as Shia Muslim, Armenian
Apostolic, Jewish, Baha’i, Jehovah’s Witness and Hare Krishna communities
are among those whose activity is banned and punishable under the
administrative or criminal law.

The surprise legal changes this year came at a time when Turkmenistan’s
government was under heavy international pressure over its human rights
abuses. Key United Nations bodies had already condemned Turkmenistan’s
record and this was due to come up again at the UN Commission on Human
Rights in Geneva, which opened on 15 March. The legal changes were heralded
by a decree from President Saparmurat Niyazov on 11 March, the same day
that the president met the visiting United States Deputy Assistant
Secretary of State Lynn Pascoe, who had raised human rights concerns. A
parallel decree issued at the same time eased exit requirements, a second
key foreign concern.

The presidential religion decree abolished the requirement to have 500
adult citizen members before a community could apply for registration with
the Adalat (Fairness or Justice) Ministry, explicitly allowing
“religious groups of citizens” to register “independently of
their number, faith and religion”. However, Adalat Ministry officials
immediately stressed to Forum 18 that unregistered activity remains a
criminal offence.

The decree was followed up by amendments to the religion law, published on
24 March. The new law requires that “religious groups” must have
between five and fifty adult citizen members to register, while
“religious organisations” must have at least fifty. In theory at
least, this removes the obstacle to registering non-Sunni Muslim and
non-Orthodox communities.

Religious groups – especially those that have suffered years of
persecution – were divided over the apparent liberalisation. Many
were sceptical that a government that had persecuted them for so long could
have had a genuine change of heart. But others were determined to at least
try to register. Among groups which immediately sought information about
the registration process from the Adalat Ministry or the government’s
Gengeshi (Council) for Religious Affairs were a number of Christian
communities – including the Catholics, New Apostolic Church, Greater Grace,
Church of Christ and Adventists – and the Baha’i community. The Russian
Orthodox Church also signalled to Forum 18 that it might wish to register
more parishes. However, many religious leaders stressed that until their
communities have registered successfully they will not be convinced that
anything has changed. One Jehovah’s Witness representative in Russia
– who maintains close contacts with fellow believers in Turkmenistan
– told Forum 18 that they believe there is “no realistic
chance” that their communities will get registration.

Serious questions were raised about the sincerity of the government’s moves
when, on 29 March, President Niyazov told officials of the Gengeshi –
which runs the Muslim community for the government – that he was
handing over three new mosques to it and that no further mosques would be
allowed. This appears to bar both Sunni and Shia Muslim communities that
have been denied registration from taking advantage of the relaxation of
the harsh registration requirements.

Even on the day the president issued his decree a Jehovah’s Witness in the
capital Ashgabad [Ashgabat] was summoned to the Gengeshi, where seven
officials – including a mullah – pressured him to renounce his
faith. He refused and was eventually allowed to leave, but he was sacked
from his job, leaving his family with no breadwinner. Two days later more
than twenty Jehovah’s Witnesses attending a meeting in a private home in
Ashgabad were taken to the police station and interrogated and threatened
by police and secret police officers. In other March incidents, police
confiscated a Bible and other religious literature from a Jehovah’s Witness
(who was also threatened with rape), and extracted money for a fine from
another Witness which he claimed to have already paid last year. On 24
March secret police officers raided the home in the town of Balkanabad
[Nebitdag] of a Baha’i, accusing him of “provoking schism” in
society by his faith and threatening to confiscate his home. Believers are
disturbed that these incidents have taken place when, officially, religious
policy is claimed to be being relaxed after a long period of persecution.

In the past few years, religious meetings have been raided (with a spate of
raids against Protestant and Hare Krishna communities during summer 2003
and intermittently since then), places used for worship have been
confiscated or demolished and believers have been beaten, fined, detained,
deported and sacked from their jobs in punishment for religious activity
the government does not like. Some believers have been given long prison
sentences in recent years for their religious activity (most of them
Jehovah’s Witnesses) or have been sent into internal exile to remote parts
of the country.

Jehovah’s Witness sources have told Forum 18 that at least five of their
young men are serving imprisonment for refusing compulsory military service
on grounds of religious conscience (Turkmenistan has no provision for
alternative service). The most recent known prisoner is Jehovah’s Witness
Rinat Babadjanov, sentenced in February in Dashoguz to several years’
imprisonment. Another Witness, Kurban Zakirov, is serving an eight-year
sentence on charges the Jehovah’s Witnesses say are trumped up.

Turkmenistan’s restrictions on religious activity come despite
constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion (repeated in the March
presidential decree) and its obligations to maintain such freedom of
religion as a member of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in
Europe (OSCE) and a signatory to international human rights conventions.
Turkmenistan has pointedly failed to respond to repeated requests from the
UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion and Belief, Professor
Abdelfattah Amor, to be allowed to visit the country or to respond to
enquiries about specific incidents.

With an authoritarian ruler, President-for-life Niyazov (who likes to call
himself “Turkmenbashi” or Father of the Turkmens), Turkmenistan
already suffers from an absence of political and social freedom. State
control was tightened even more in the wake of a failed assassination
attempt on the president in November 2002, which some observers believe may
have been staged to provide a pretext for repression. Niyazov’s rule is
characterised by a grotesque cult of personality, with ever-present statues
and portraits. Works he allegedly wrote – especially the Ruhnama
(Book of the Soul), which officials have likened to the Koran or the Bible
– are compulsorily imposed on schools and the wider public. Russian
Orthodox priests and Sunni Muslim imams are forced to quite approvingly
from the Ruhnama in sermons, and to display it prominently in places of
worship.

Turkmenistan’s deliberate isolation from the outside world and the punitive
measures taken against those engaged in unauthorised religious activity
make religious freedom reporting very difficult. Believers often fear
retribution for reporting their difficulties, and so Forum 18 is unable to
give the names or identifying features of sources within the country.

Religious activity is overseen by the secret police’s department for work
with social organisations and religious groups. This department, formerly
the sixth department of the National Security Committee (KNB), is one of
the six or seven main departments of the State Security Ministry (MSS) and
was created when the KNB was restructured in late 2002. The social and
religious affairs department of the secret police is believed to have 45
officers at the headquarters in Ashgabad, with a handful of officers in
each local branch.

Local MSS secret police officers regularly summon Muslim and Orthodox
clerics to report on activity within their communities. Some believers have
told Forum 18 that the MSS also runs “spies” in each Muslim and
Orthodox community, sometimes as many as half a dozen. In addition to their
spies – who attend the religious community solely at MSS behest to
gain information – there might be another ten or fifteen believers
who are regularly interviewed by MSS officers and forced to reveal details
of the community’s religious life.

The MSS secret police and the ordinary police also try to recruit spies in
unregistered religious groups, such as with the attempted recruitment of a
member of a Baptist church they had detained in June 2003 in Turkmenabad.

The Gengeshi for Religious Affairs – which is headed by an imam,
Yagshimurat Atamuradov – has nominal responsibility for religious
affairs, and has a headquarters in Ashgabad and branch offices in each of
Turkmenistan’s five velayats (regions). The Gengeshi’s main job appears to
be approving clerical appointments in the Sunni Muslim and Orthodox
communities. “Imams are chosen by the Gengeshi and are then approved
by the president,” one source told Forum 18. Niyazov confirmed this in
March 2004, when he instructed Gengeshi officials to make sure they
appointed all imams, warning them not to allow local believers to do so.

The Adalat Ministry officially registers religious organisations, although
until now it has had little work to do on this as so few applications have
been approved anyway. Shirin Akhmedova, the official at the ministry in
charge of registering religious organisations, told Forum 18 in March that
152 religious communities currently have registration, 140 of them Muslim
and 12 Russian Orthodox. She admitted that far more religious communities
had registration before 1997, when the harsh restrictions on registration
came in (there were some 250 registered Muslim communities alone, as well
as communities of many other faiths).

Unregistered religious communities face regular raids by MSS secret police
officers, backed up by ordinary police officers, officials of the local
administration and local religious affairs officials, who work closely
together in suppressing and punishing as criminal all unregistered
religious activity.

Even the two officially-recognised faiths – the Sunni Muslim Board
and the Russian Orthodox Church – face government meddling and
require government approval for the nomination of all officials. In January
2003 President Niyazov ousted the Chief Mufti, Nasrullah ibn Ibadullah, an
ethnic Uzbek who had led Turkmenistan’s Muslims for the previous ten years,
and replaced him with the 35-year-old Kakageldy Vepaev, someone widely
believed to be more pliant.

In the wake of his dismissal, Nasrullah ibn Ibadullah apparently lived
quietly in his home town of Dashoguz until mid-January of this year, when
he was arrested, apparently accused of being an accomplice in the apparent
November 2002 assassination attempt. An MSS-compiled “confession”
allegedly written in prison by the chief plotter, Boris Shikhmuradov,
alleged that the former chief mufti had been a key associate with the code
name “Rasputin”. Nasrullah ibn Ibadullah was sentenced to 22
years’ imprisonment at a closed trial in Ashgabad on 2 March. It remains
unclear whether he was punished for his lack of enthusiasm for the
president’s book the Ruhnama, for taking part in the plot, or as a
prominent member of the Uzbek minority.

Vepaev has taken over Nasrullah’s role in enforcing the president’s
religious policy. His dual role – as a Muslim leader and a state
official (he is also one of the deputy chairmen of the Gengeshi for
Religious Affairs) – became all too apparent during the crackdown on
Protestant and Hare Krishna communities in spring 2003: he personally took
part in raids on Protestant churches in Ashgabad and in follow-up meetings
at hyakimliks (local administrations) when church members were questioned
and threatened. In a similar move, local mullahs have frequently been
involved in raids on local religious minorities elsewhere in the country,
threatening them and calling them to renounce their faith and, if they are
ethnic Turkmens, to “return” to their ancestral faith.

Sunni Muslim mosques are reported to have seen attendance slump as, in
response to government orders, imams placed copies of the Ruhnama in
mosques with equal prominence as copies of the Koran. At least one mosque
has been closed down after its imam refused to put the Ruhnama in a place
of honour. The grand mosques constructed on the president’s orders –
and with state funds – are likewise reported to be largely empty, as
Muslims decline to regard them as places of worship. Imams are, at least in
theory, required to recite the oath of loyalty to the president and country
at the end of the namaz (daily prayers). President Niyazov told Muslims in
2000 that they were to renounce the hadiths, sayings attributed to the
Prophet Muhammad which do not appear in the Koran but are valued by devout
Muslims.

Devout Muslims have expressed concern about the government-sponsored
ousting of imams who have theological education in favour of those who have
never been formally educated in Islam. In the past, imams were educated in
neighbouring Uzbekistan, but that appears to have come to a halt. Even in
areas dominated by Turkmenistan’s ethnic Uzbek minority, such as in the
Dashoguz [Dashhowuz] region of north-eastern Turkmenistan, the authorities
have ousted ethnic Uzbek imams and replaced them with ethnic Turkmens.

One source told Forum 18 that the decline in the level of education among
practising imams has led to a growth in respect for the artsakal, a
traditional religious leader. “They have preserved their authority and
people go to them for weddings and funerals,” the source reported.
“The authorities don’t attack them.”

Government tolerance of Sunni Islam has not extended to Shia Islam, which
is mainly professed by the ethnic Azeri and Iranian minorities in the west
of the country who are traditionally more devout than ethnic Turkmens. Shia
mosques failed to gain re-registration during the compulsory round of
re-registration in 1997 after the adoption of the much harsher law on
religion and, judging by the president’s remarks in March, appear unable to
apply for registration now. An unregistered Shia mosque in the Caspian port
city of Turkmenbashi [Türkmenbashy] was raided last December as local
Shias commemorated the death of the former Azerbaijani president Heidar
Aliev.

The president’s dislike of Shia Islam has also extended into history. Among
the accusations levelled at the 78-year-old writer Rahim Esenov was that he
had correctly portrayed Bayram Khan, a sixteenth-century regent of the
Mughal Empire and the hero of one of his novels, as a Shia rather than a
Sunni Muslim. Niyazov had warned Esenov in 1997 to amend his text, but the
writer had refused to comply. Detained earlier this year, national security
officers repeatedly asked him about why Bayram Khan was depicted as a Shia.
Freed from prison in March under international pressure, Esenov awaits
trial accused of inciting social, religious and ethnic hatred under Article
177 of the criminal code

The Russian Orthodox Church, which is nominally under the control of the
Church’s Central Asian diocese led from the Uzbek capital Tashkent by
Metropolitan Vladimir (Ikim), is in fact under the direct control of the
Ashgabad-based priest Fr Andrei Sapunov, widely regarded with suspicion by
members of the Orthodox Church and other Christian faiths who have suffered
from his actions.

In an echo of the practice in Sunni Muslim mosques, Orthodox priests
reportedly received instructions from the end of 2000 to quote from the
Ruhnama in sermons and to “preach to us about the virtues of living in
Turkmenistan and of the policies of Turkmenbashi,” one parishioner
complained.

Close to President Niyazov, Fr Sapunov frequently deploys the extravagant
personal praise of the president required of all officials. Many Orthodox
regard such statements as close to blasphemy. Some Orthodox have told Forum
18 that they have evidence he passes information received in the
confessional to the secret police.

In addition to his duties in the Church, Fr Sapunov is also one of the
deputy chairmen of the Gengeshi for Religious Affairs, with particular
responsibility for Christian affairs. This gives him an official power of
veto over the affairs of other Christian denominations. He is also
well-known in the secret police, even to local officers outside Ashgabad.
During numerous raids on Protestant churches in different regions, secret
police officers have told the Protestants that they must gain permission
from Fr Sapunov before they can operate.

The 1996 religion law specified that an individual religious community
needed 500 signatures of adult citizen members before it could apply for
registration. Officials repeatedly declared (although it was not specified
in the law) that these 500 had to live in one city district or one rural
district. This made it all but impossible for any new religious community
to register, even if the government wished to allow it to. Most religious
communities – including many mosques – lost their registration
and had to close down in the wake of the new law. Most Islamic schools were
also closed. It is so far unclear if the Adalat Ministry will register all
those communities that now wish to register under the new religion law.

Article 205 of the Code of Administrative Offences, which dates back to the
Soviet period, specifies fines for those refusing to register their
religious communities of five to ten times the minimum monthly wage, with
typical fines of 250,000 manats (363 Norwegian kroner, 44 Euros or 48 US
dollars at the inflated official exchange rate). Fines can be doubled for
repeat offenders. Many believers of a variety of faiths have been fined
under this article, including a series of Baptists and Hare Krishna
devotees last year after the series of raids on unregistered religious
meetings.

There is a Catholic mission in Turkmenistan, based at the Vatican
nunciature in Ashgabad. However, at present Catholics can only hold Masses
on this Vatican diplomatic territory. The priests have diplomatic status.

One of the biggest religious communities that has been denied registration
is the Armenian Apostolic Church. An estimated fifteen per cent of those
who attend Russian Orthodox churches are said by local people to be
Armenians, although the Armenian Church is of the Oriental family of
Christian Churches, not of the Orthodox family. “Sapunov told parish
priests to accept Armenian believers,” one local Orthodox told Forum
18. However, the Orthodox Church would stand to lose a sizeable proportion
of its flock were the government to allow the Armenian Church to revive its
activity.

The one surviving pre-revolutionary Armenian church – in the Caspian
port city of Turkmenbashi – is said to be in a “sorry state of
repair”. The Armenian ambassador to Turkmenistan has repeatedly sought
permission for it to be restored and reopened as a place of worship but in
vain. When the Armenian priest last visited from neighbouring Uzbekistan he
had to conduct baptisms and hold services in the Armenian embassy in
Ashgabad. Some Armenians expect that the new law will allow the community
finally to register and regain its church.

Religious parents – Muslim, Christian and members of other faiths –
face a dilemma over whether to send their children to state-run schools.
With the Ruhnama playing a major role in the school curriculum from the
very first year, together with recitation of the oath of loyalty to the
country and president, many religious parents do not wish to subject their
children to blasphemous practices. The oath of loyalty, which is printed at
the top of daily newspapers, reads: “Turkmenistan, beloved homeland,
my native land, both in my thoughts and in my heart I am eternally with
you. For the slightest evil caused to you, let my hand be cut off. For the
slightest calumny against you, may my tongue lose its strength. In the
moment of treachery to the fatherland, to the president, to your holy
banner, let my breathing cease.”

After the adoption in July 2002 of the law on guarantees of the rights of
the child, the unregistered Baptist Church complained bitterly about
Article 24 part 2 which declared: “Parents or the legal
representatives of the child are obliged … to bring him up in a spirit of
humanism and the unshakeable spiritual values embodied in the holy
Ruhnama.” Pointing out that officials are promoting the Ruhnama as
“the last word of God to the Turkmen people”, the Baptists
declared: “In practice this law is a direct infringement on the
freedom of conscience of citizens professing faith in Jesus Christ or
another faith not recognised by the state.”

Orthodox Christians echo the Baptists’ concerns, telling Forum 18 that the
issue has put Russian Orthodox priests in a difficult position.
“Worried parents have come to their priests,” one Orthodox
Christian reported. “The priest can’t tell his parishioners not to
send their children to school. All he can do is tell them to do as their
conscience dictates.” Some parents have begun to teach their children
privately at home.

The obstructions to travel abroad have made it difficult to take part in
international gatherings. In March border guards took two female Jehovah’s
Witnesses off the aeroplane at Ashgabad airport while on route to a
Jehovah’s Witness meeting in Kiev. They were barred from leaving the
country.

Believers who want to receive information from fellow-believers abroad face
virtually insurmountable obstacles. Access to the Internet is possible only
via state providers that exert strict control over what information can be
accessed. The majority of international religious websites are simply not
accessible by an Internet user in Turkmenistan. Moreover, a special
computer program searches emails for coded words that could be used to send
“unreliable information”, while “a suspicious message”
will simply not reach the addressee.

Religious literature is no longer published in Turkmenistan. Mosques and
Russian Orthodox churches often have small kiosks where a limited quantity
of literature is available. A typical Orthodox church bookstall might have
a few prayer books, small icons and calendars, with the Bible available
only erratically – and often, at about 12 US dollars, too expensive
for the badly-paid local people. Supplies of religious literature and
articles to Orthodox churches are equally erratic, with no official
distribution of books, icons, candles and baptismal crosses.

Orthodox believers trying to receive alternative information are in a more
difficult situation than Sunni Muslims. Under a September 2002 presidential
decree, direct subscription to Russian newspapers and magazines, including
religious publications such as the Journal of the Moscow Patriarchate, is
banned in Turkmenistan. Even Orthodox priests do not receive the Journal
regularly, being forced to rely on old copies they pick up when they are
visiting Moscow or Tashkent.

Of the Russian television channels, only a few hours a day of the ORT
channel are broadcast, and then only with a day’s delay after programmes
have been approved by a censor. Currently there are a number of broadcasts
on Russian television covering Orthodox issues. The broadcast of Russian
cable programmes is forbidden in Turkmenistan, so that unlike in other
Central Asian states, local Orthodox believers cannot use this as an
alternative source of religious news.

Officials have not simply restricted themselves to banning the receipt of
political information from the former metropolis. Purely religious
communications between local Orthodox believers and Russia have inevitably
also been obstructed. As Turkmenistan has become even more isolated from
Russia, individual Orthodox believers have become more isolated from the
Moscow Patriarchate.

Religious literature is routinely confiscated from members of unregistered
religious minorities during police raids on their homes or as they return
to the country from foreign travels.

With sweeping measures against religious groups in the wake of the harsher
religion law in 1996, the denial of registration to most religious
communities in the 1997 re-registration drive, the expulsion of hundreds of
foreigners, mainly Russians, engaged in religious activity (including
Muslims, Baptists, Pentecostals, Jehovah’s Witnesses and Hare Krishna
devotees), the confiscation or demolition of unauthorised places of worship
(including Ashgabad’s Adventist church in November 1999), the sacking of
believers from their work (especially Jehovah’s Witnesses and Protestants)
and a climate of fear only slightly tempered by the promised registration
of minority faiths, the Turkmen authorities have succeeded in all but
wiping out public religious activity except in a small number of registered
Sunni Muslim and Russian Orthodox places of worship.

All other religious activity has of necessity to be shrouded in secrecy,
with believers having to hide their faith and worship from the knowledge of
intrusive state officials. In response to the pressure, all unregistered
communities have seen the numbers of their active members fall. Yet despite
the severe controls and the threat of punishment, the remaining believers
practice their various faiths as best they can while waiting for better
times.

The changes to the law this year show that concerted pressure on the
Turkmenistan authorities from outside has led to a public change of the
proclaimed policy. However, for religious believers to see real and not
spurious change, the Adalat Ministry will have to register all religious
communities that apply for registration without discrimination;
unregistered religious activity will have to be decriminalised (including
abolishing articles of the criminal and civil code which punish
unregistered religious activity); believers in prison for their faith will
have to be freed; there will have to be an end to police and security
ministry raids on private homes where believers are meeting for worship;
there will have to be an end to interrogations of and fines on believers;
those fined for practising their faith will have to be compensated;
believers who have been fired from their jobs for their membership of
minority religious communities will have to be reinstated; those
responsible for raiding religious meetings and beating and otherwise
punishing believers for the free exercise of their faith will have to be
brought to legal accountability; and believers will have to be able to
enjoy the right to publish and distribute whatever religious literature
they wish to and organise and take part in religious education freely. Only
if the authorities meet these obligations will believers in Turkmenistan
believe that the situation has changed irrevocably for the better.

A printer-friendly map of Turkmenistan is available at
;Rootmap=turkme
(END)

© Forum 18 News Service. All rights reserved.

You may reproduce or quote this article provided that credit is given to
F18News

Past and current Forum 18 information can be found at

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://www.forum18.org/
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/xpeditions/atlas/index.html?Parent=asia&amp
http://www.forum18.org/
http://www.forum18.org/

Freedom House Report Highlights Countries With Democratic Deficits

Radio Free Europe, Czech Republic
April 7 2004

World: Freedom House Report Highlights Countries With Democratic
Deficits
By Breffni O’Rourke

The U.S.-based pro-democracy organization Freedom House has issued a
report that examines the problems and hurdles facing democratic
development in 30 countries. The report concludes that Uzbekistan is
one of the most repressive countries in the world. It also says
democratic efforts in Kyrgyzstan have stalled, as they have in
Armenia and Ukraine. Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan are described as
having authoritarian systems.

Prague, 7 April 2004 (RFE/RL) — Freedom House, an organization that
monitors democracy around the world, today published a list of
countries that it claims need help to achieve democracy — or to
further improve it.

The New York-based group says its list of 30 countries is the first
of its kind. It is aimed not just at criticizing the countries named
but also at drawing the international community’s attention to the
fact that they need assistance.

In presenting the report — called “Countries at the Crossroads” —
Freedom House’s Executive Director Jennifer Windsor said “these
countries are at key transition points and to ignore their needs
creates a risk of both individual backsliding and regional democratic
deterioration.”

The list includes Afghanistan and Pakistan; the Central Asian nations
of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan; in the Caucasus, Armenia,
Azerbaijan, and Georgia; and in Europe, Ukraine. Several Arab states
are also mentioned, such as Bahrain, Qatar, and Yemen.

— In Afghanistan, the report finds that the “rule of the gun largely
supersedes the rule of law.” It says that extra military support is
urgently needed to stabilize the country outside the capital Kabul,
and that the rights of Afghan women remain at Taliban-era levels in
some regions.

— In Pakistan, it says the growing role of the military in
government and civil life is a major obstacle to democratic reform,
and that promises of reform have not so far shown results.

— In Kazakhstan, the report finds an authoritarian system with
limited scope for political competition.

— Kyrgyzstan, it says, has experienced initial democratic openings
that have since stalled or eroded.

— The report sees Uzbekistan as being among the most politically
repressive states in the world, having perpetrated what it calls
“gross violations” of human rights and religious freedoms.

Turning to the Caucasus, the Freedom House report finds that:

— In Armenia, the limited democratic reforms that were undertaken
have gradually eroded, and stalled, and are in danger of complete
reversal.

— In Georgia, before November’s ouster of President Eduard
Shevardnadze, the situation was rated the same as in Armenia.

— In Azerbaijan, there is an authoritarian system with limited scope
for political competition.

— In Ukraine, the limited democratic reforms that were undertaken
have gradually eroded, and stalled, and are in danger of complete
reversal.

“I think the key question is what happens to U.S. policy — for how
long the U.S. is going to go on supporting authoritarian regimes in
Central Asia while trying to spread democracy in the Middle East?” —
Political analyst Heather Grabbe of the Centre for European
ReformFreedom House’s inclusion today of Uzbekistan as one of the
most repressive regimes comes after the European Bank for
Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) announced yesterday that it was
banning most loans to Uzbekistan because of continued political
repression and lack of economic reform.

EBRD President Jean Lemierre said the bank will stay engaged to push
for reforms but can no longer conduct business as usual in
Uzbekistan.

EBRD spokesman Jeff Hiday — speaking in London before yesterday’s
decision — gave the methodology on which the bank based its
decision. It set criteria against which Uzbekistan’s performance
could be measured.

“The environment in Uzbekistan has been particularly challenging. So
we set seven benchmarks. And we sought for Uzbekistan to demonstrate
progress on these benchmarks. The extent to which they made progress
would determine the extent to which we continue to invest in the
country,” Hiday said.

The watchdog organization Human Rights Watch today praised the EBRD’s
decision, calling it “unprecedented” and “principled,” and describing
Uzbekistan’s rights record as “appalling.”

Human Rights Watch spokeswoman Vanessa Saenan said in Brussels that
the EBRD should apply its benchmark system to other countries, as
well.

“There are several other countries out there, particularly in Central
Asia and the Caucasus, where a similar approach to that taken with
respect to Uzbekistan would be warranted,” Saenan said.

Another Human Rights Watch spokeswoman, Veronika Leila in Geneva,
listed those countries, saying such benchmarking could become a
standard method for measuring progress in democratic and economic
reforms.

“It would be Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan. In the
South Caucasus, we are talking about Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia.
In Europe, it would not be unwarranted to take a similar approach
with respect to Ukraine. So we are really hoping that the [EBRD],
after this experience with Uzbekistan, will become more forceful and
serious about its political mandate, as it has really demonstrated
that it is able to ‘operationalize’, if you wish, its political
mandate, which makes clear that it was set up to engage those
countries in the region which do respect democracy and human rights,”
Leila said.

Leila called on the United States and the European Union to take a
harder line with countries like Uzbekistan, which are allies but
which do not observe human rights. She noted that the U.S. government
must soon issue its periodic certifications for Kazakhstan and
Uzbekistan, confirming that they are making progress on rights
commitments so that aid can be continued.

She said these two countries are plainly not making progress.

Political analyst Heather Grabbe of the Centre for European Reform in
London said that much will depend on what the United States does.

“I think the key question is what happens to U.S. policy — for how
long the U.S. is going to go on supporting authoritarian regimes in
Central Asia while trying to spread democracy in the Middle East? It
doesn’t really make sense, and obviously the U.S. agenda has a huge
impact on the role of the international organizations,” Grabbe said.

Grabbe said it’s an important moment for international donors to
consider the conditions they attach to their financing. But she also
said there was a persistent lack of consensus within the
international community on how to deal with repressive regimes.

The complete Freedom House survey can be found on the Internet at

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

www.freedomhouse.org/research/crossroads/cac.htm

BAKU: Stop Viewing Relations w/Turkey thru rose-coloured spectacles

Daily speculates on Azeri campaign against opening of Turkish-Armenian border

Zerkalo, Baku
6 Apr 04

The Baku government has orchestrated a protest of Azerbaijani
reporters in Turkey against the opening of the Armenian border,
Azerbaijani daily Zerkalo has reported. The Azerbaijani leadership is
attempting to exert pressure on Turkey ahead of President Ilham
Aliyev’s visit to this country later this month, the newspaper
said. But Turkey seems to have made up its mind to lift the blockade
of Armenia since this country itself has serious problems with
Yerevan. On the other hand, there is European pressure, and Ankara is
ready to pay the highest price for EU membership, the daily said. The
sooner Turkey becomes an EU member, the better for Azerbaijan. Turkey
could then influence EU decisions relating to Azerbaijan, Zerkalo
said. The following is the text of the report by R. Mirqadirov in
Azerbaijani newspaper Zerkalo on 6 April headlined “Time to stop
viewing relations with fraternal Turkey through rose-coloured
spectacles”; subheadings inserted editorially:

Azerbaijan tries to exert pressure on Turkey

Contradictions in relations between two fraternal countries have
become visible ahead of the Azerbaijani president’s official visit to
Turkey. For the first time after gaining independence Azerbaijan is
not solving existing problems amicably through diplomatic channels,
but is trying “to exert pressure” on the Turkish government through
“public opinion” and that is a fact.

At the initiative of the independent TV company ANS, as a circulated
statement reads, on 6 April a group of journalists from leading media
outlets will go to the Turkish-Armenian border to stage an action
under the slogan “Turks must support Turks”. The rally-goers are even
planning to form a symbolic “live impassable border” between Turkey
and Armenia. The action will end in Ankara.

To all appearances, some opposition forces in Turkey will back this
action as they believe that the [Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip]
Erdogan government is making inadmissible concessions for the sake of
EU membership. It is not a coincidence that the rally-goers will call
on the Turkish government not to yield to “pressure from some
countries” and not to open the border with Armenia. It would not be
very difficult for Ankara to sort out problems with individual
countries. Things are different with the EU which has been insisting
on the opening of the border. The Erdogan government is prepared to
pay the highest price for Turkey’s EU membership.

Given the aforesaid, it is difficult to imagine that the group of
journalists “from the leading media outlets leave for Turkey” without
“permission” especially ahead of [Azerbaijani President] Ilham
Aliyev’s first visit to Ankara as president. It is clear that this
demarche of the two countries’ public, which has been organized by the
Azerbaijani side and which will most probably involve Turkey’s
opposition forces, is unlikely to create a favourable atmosphere in
the forthcoming talks between Ilham Aliyev and Erdogan. Thus, the
Azerbaijani government is deliberately aggravating relations with the
Erdogan government to some extent. But is it worth doing so?

Let us start with the positive aspect. For the first time ever the
Azerbaijani government is trying to use resources of the
non-government sector to implement a specific foreign policy task. It
is a pleasing aspect on its own.

Opening of border formality

Let us now talk about the essence of the problem. If the Azerbaijani
government tries to use public pressure to prevent the opening of the
border and, in doing so, almost jeopardizes Ilham Aliyev’s forthcoming
visit to the fraternal country, this means that all other diplomatic
means have failed to settle this problem, i.e. the opening of the
border with Armenia is already a settled issue and this is all only
formalities.

Is this in the interests of the Azerbaijani government? Obviously,
no. No matter who says what, Azerbaijani society will most probably
assess the opening of the border between Turkey and Armenia as a major
foreign policy failure of the new Azerbaijani president. Ilham
Aliyev’s opponents will recall that international organizations
demanded that Turkey open the border with Armenia in the past as
well. But Ankara did not do so during [late Azerbaijani President]
Heydar Aliyev’s tenure.

Armenia to get political rather than economic dividends

But this is not the whole story. The opening of the border and
establishment of normal economic and diplomatic relations between
Armenia and Turkey will naturally strengthen the position of the
incumbent Armenian leadership, on the whole, and [Armenian President]
Robert Kocharyan in particular.

Armenia will not receive economic dividends from the opening of the
border at the beginning. First, the Armenian market is too small for
serious Turkish investors. Second, the opening of the border is one
issue, but the establishment of serious economic relations is
completely different. But one could “unofficially” regulate the level
of economic relations as well. Third, Armenia is far behind from
regional integration processes and major economic projects. That is
why, it is unlikely that anyone in Armenia could seriously hope for
the rapid improvement of the internal economic situation after the
opening of the border with Turkey.

As for political dividends, the Armenian government will obviously get
them. First, Armenia will speak everywhere about the failure of the
blockade policy. Second, Kocharyan will receive certain trumps in the
struggle with the pro-Western part of the opposition which has accused
him of the isolation policy and has already announced nationwide
rallies against the incumbent regime starting on 9 April. Kocharyan
will prove his ability to end the country’s isolation without
concessions in such principled issues as the Karabakh problem.

Turkey plays own game

What about Turkey? Ankara has been trying to speculate on the Karabakh
problem for a long period, claiming to revise its relations with
Yerevan only after the settlement of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict
and liberation of all occupied Azerbaijani territories. Many people in
Azerbaijan have been gladly trusting this, forgetting that Turkey
itself has serious problems with Armenia. These are, first of all,
the problem of the so-called “genocide” and western territories,
i.e. Armenia insists on the international recognition of “the
genocide” and has territorial claims to Turkey. Having these problems,
it would be stupid of Turkey to establish normal relations with
Armenia.

Incidentally, the recognition of “the genocide” is not only an issue
of “restoring the historical truth” as the Armenian government claims,
but it can have quite specific negative financial consequences for
Turkey. Having recognized “the Jewish genocide”, Germany is still
paying to the descendants of Nazi concentration camp victims. These
prospects could be excessive for the Turkish economy which is hardly
stable and prosperous, unlike the German one.

But today Turkey has made serious concessions in the Cyprus issue for
the sake of its EU membership. The Cyprus issue is more important for
the Turkish government and the entire Turkish people rather than the
Karabakh problem. That is why, one should not be under a delusion and
think that Turkey will reject EU membership because of Azerbaijan. But
Turkey should solve its own problems with Armenia after all.

Zerkalo has learnt from informed Turkish diplomatic channels that
Yerevan and Ankara have recently had intensive unofficial diplomatic
contacts. In exchange for the opening of the border, Ankara has been
trying to achieve Yerevan’s guarantee that it will remove the
so-called “genocide” issue from the agenda. Incidentally, it is not
quite necessary that Armenia should give up the idea of the official
recognition of the genocide at the state level. Yerevan should not
simply exaggerate this issue in the future.

Thus, Ankara is trying to solve its own problems, but pretends that it
is allegedly forced to sacrifice Azerbaijan’s interests to EU
pressure.

Azerbaijan should back Turkey’s EU membership bid

But we already must stop looking through rose-coloured spectacles and
see the practical side of the issue. Let Turkish society itself think
about the worth of opening the state border with Armenia without
certain guarantees for the settlement of the problems existing between
Ankara and Yerevan.

Ankara must realize that the EU is not in a hurry to see Turkey as its
member. Turkey is a big country in terms of human resources and
territory, which has the key geopolitical location and many serious
economic problems. Brussels realizes very well that Turkey’s
membership will create many problems for the EU itself. From this
viewpoint, the South Caucasus countries have better chances to become
EU members than Turkey.

At the same time, Azerbaijan should have an interest in Turkey’s EU
membership, the sooner, the better. At least, Turkey could then
directly influence EU decisions and even block those which are
unfavourable for Azerbaijan’s interests. It will be then possible to
judge whether fraternal ties between Azerbaijan and Turkey are strong
enough.

On the other hand, as soon as Turkey becomes an EU member, it will be
obliged to have the same level of relations both with Azerbaijan and
Armenia.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress