Letter from Armenia

Nation.Cymru
Wales, UK – Nov 23 2023
CULTURE


Deian Timms

Yma o Hyd may have been written about the Welsh, but if there’s a nation that embodies this spirit, it’s Armenia.

Arriving a week before the game, I flew to Tbilisi and took the sleeper train down to Yerevan, hoping Wales could put right June’s 2-4 trouncing.

The workhorse Soviet-era engine clunked and passports were checked on five separate occasions through the night – once on a freezing platform somewhere in rural Georgia, having been ushered off spotlit carriages by border guards and circled by stray dogs.

Sleeper train proved to be something of a misnomer.

Smugness

Stepping off at Yerevan, I trudged toward the centre and arrived to a beautiful dawn over Republic Square. After finally finding an open café, I basked in the smugness of how cool the journey would sound to my Wales Away friends.

After a drizzly day taking in the main sights of the capital, I was off again.

As the first Christian state, ancient monasteries dot the landscape of Armenia. From Gegham with its chambers carved into the mountainside, to Haghartsin hidden amongst the rolling hills of Dilijan that reminded me of home.

But being a fanboy of brutalist architecture, my personal pilgrimages took me to the Iron Fountain of Gyumri(which sounds pleasingly like the treigliad of Cymru) and to Sevan to the Armenian Writer’s Union retreat, jutting out over the lake like an avant-garde modernist Tŷ Newydd.

I met with my Armenian friend Yana that I knew through a previous job in Brussels, who very kindly showed me some of the more inaccessible sights as well as the best spots back in Yerevan.

A researcher and former parliamentary legal advisor, Yana comes from Nagorno-Karabakh (the Russian term often used in English), known in Armenian as Artsakh.

Artsakh is a disputed region, historically populated by Armenians but given to Azerbaijan by Stalin as part of a divide and rule strategy.

As the USSR creaked and then crumbled, long-standing tension flared into violence. Its most recent chapter saw a nine-month blockade and large-scale military offensive carried out by Azerbaijan. This forced a hundred-thousand Armenians to abandon their homes practically overnight in September this year, which has been considered ethnic cleansing by a European Parliament resolution.

When Yana went to study in the United States last year, the blockade had not yet started. When she left for California, she had no idea she would not be coming back to her home.

Now living in Yerevan with other members of her family forced to leave, she says many Artsakh people are struggling in the capital as they face a confusing legal status in addition to the profound and recent trauma of losing their homes and communities.

Employers are hesitant to hire people from Artsakh because of this uncertainty and although those from Artsakh have Armenian passports, they are technically not Armenian citizens and may have to be registered as refugees.

The majority have gone to Yerevan to find work. Accommodation is scarce and some landlords, sensing opportunity, have raised prices. The perception is that Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has done very little indeed (to be polite) to help in the wake of this crisis.

Traditions

There is an additional worry that being dispersed throughout the capital – a city of over 1 million – the distinct culture and dialect will struggle without Artsakhi spaces. The wounds are still exceedingly raw, but one hopes that in time groups and organisations will form to preserve these traditions and language for future generations. And hope remains amongst those that have fled that they will one day return.

Thanks to Yana I got a seat in the home end for the match. With the sun setting and people shuffling to their seats, I started spotting other Welsh fans in the stands, undeterred by the previous night’s rough treatment of members of the Wal Goch at the hands of the Yerevan police.

Despite our very crafty donning of Armenia scarves and flags, hastily bought from the market on the walk to the stadium, we weren’t fooling anyone. Knowing nods and winks were exchanged at key moments but staying seated and silent and hands firmly in our pockets, especially during the anthem, was not easy.

Sat to my left was a lanky teenage Armenian boy of about 14 who appeared to be having the best day of his life, his enthusiasm so genuinely infectious that I almost forgot I wasn’t supporting Armenia when Lucas Zelarayan scored a 5th minute goal.

His voice broke as he booed, and I struggled to hold back my laughter on several occasions as he shouted in English “FC crybaby!” every time a Wales player was fouled and a rather cutting “David Brooks: random guy!” at the away end.

A scrappy 1-1 draw led to a fantastic night out with mates, ending up at a dive bar run by Russian hipsters. Many young, liberal Russians have come to Yerevan since the invasion of Ukraine, setting up cafés and restaurants and making respectable efforts at learning and using the Armenian language.

In contrast to Tbilisi and Wales Away’s previous host-city Riga, there is no anti-Russian graffiti around the city centre.

Critical

I asked Yana about this, who said whilst Armenians might be extremely critical of the Russian government or policy – there is a deep sense of betrayal at Russia’s failure to safeguard the 2020 ceasefire agreement, effectively allowing Azerbaijan to freely take Artsakh – there is no resentment or xenophobia towards ordinary Russians.

Most welcome the new arrivals, boosting diversity in an otherwise rather homogenous Yerevan. A refreshing take.

As many fans left the day after the match, there was one final visit, Khor Virap.

Khor Virap is a hilltop monastery frequented by pilgrims, wedding parties and soldiers alike, located on the plain that surrounds Mount Ararat: the holy mountain and national symbol of Armenia, and considered the landing place of Noah’s Ark. Its scale is difficult to describe and at over 5000m high (Yr Wyddfa stands at 1058m), its presence looms wherever you go.

But just beyond the monastery lies the closed border with Türkiye, guarded by Russian towers. Following the Armenian Genocide, Mount Ararat today lies within Turkish territory, and the atrocities are to this day officially denied by the Turkish state.

The call to prayer was audible from villages just a couple of kilometres past the border fence. Also within sight is the northernmost tip of Iran, just 7km away.

I don’t think I’ve ever felt the weight of history quite so heavy in the air.

Further up the rocks from the monastery, an Armenian flag flaps defiantly. Naturally we walk up for a photo at the top. We get in position to pose and I notice something on the pole. A Wrexham AFC sticker. Of course.

Armenian govt allots almost $5 mln for initial social expenses of displaced persons from Nagorno-Karabakh

Interfax
Nov 23 2023

YEREVAN. Nov 23 (Interfax) – The Armenian government has allotted 2 billion drams (about $4.98 million) for initial social expenses of displaced persons from Nagorno-Karabakh.

The decision was made at a government meeting on Thursday.

"It is planned to allot 50,000 drams [about $125] to each person in November-December. The program beneficiaries will be 40,000 people," Armenian Labor and Social Affairs Minister Narek Mkrtchyan said.

People who received a one-off compensation of 100,000 drams (about $250) are also eligible for the program, he said.

"The program does not apply to those who had over 2 million drams [about $4,989] on their bank accounts as of October 2, persons registered in the State Register of the Armenian Population before September 19, persons staying outside Armenia or those staying at hotels and guest houses as of November 15. The compensation is given on the basis of a one-off online application, and payments are made exclusively in cashless form through banks," Mkrtchyan said.

The one-off compensation of 100,000 drams (about $250) has been received by 108,336 people to date, he said.

https://interfax.com/newsroom/top-stories/96811/ 

Özbiliz announces retirement, bid for FFA presidency

 15:03,

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 22, ARMENPRESS. Footballer Aras Özbiliz has announced his retirement.

He said at a press conference on November 22 that he will run for the presidency of the Football Federation of Armenia in the upcoming elections. 

“Football gave me more than I could imagine,” the former Armenia winger said. “I am quitting my football career, but this is the beginning of a new path. I would’ve been able to play on another level with my potential if not for the injuries…I’ve always said that I would be useful to Armenian football after retiring. I think Armenian football is now at an important crossroads. I am nominating my candidacy in the FFA elections. I can be greatly useful to Armenian football with my experience and devotion,” Özbiliz said.

The elections of a new president of the Football Federation will take place on December 23rd.

Nikol Pashinyan and Abdul Latif Jamal Rashid discuss issues related to further development of Armenian-Iraqi cooperation

 16:49,

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 22, ARMENPRESS. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan hosted the delegation led by the President of the Republic of Iraq, Abdul Latif Jamal Rashid, who arrived in Armenia on an official visit, the Prime Minister’s Office said in a readout.

Photos by Hayk Manukyan

Prime Minister Pashinyan said in his welcoming speech. "Honorable Mr. President, I am happy to welcome you and the delegation led by you to the Republic of Armenia. Your visit is significant and, in fact, historic because you are the first President of Iraq to visit the Republic of Armenia.

There are rich cultural and historical ties between our countries, and I am happy to report that there is also a certain activation of economic ties. I hope that economic cooperation will deepen during your visit. Of course, the situation in the world and in the region is quite complicated now, and I will be happy to hear your assessments regarding the general situation and solutions.

Honorable Mr. President, let me once again welcome you to the Republic of Armenia and express the hope that mutual visits between high-ranking officials of our countries will become more frequent as a result of your historic visit."

The President of the Republic of Iraq stated in his turn. "Honorable Mr. Prime Minister, let me thank you and thank for hosting the delegation led by me in your country. We arrived yesterday and the time we spent was productive and interesting.

During the meeting with the President, we discussed the relations between the two countries in various fields, as well as we talked about the current situation in Iraq, we touched on the bilateral cooperation in the political, economic, and trade spheres. We hope that it will be further strengthened.

I would also like to express my support to the Armenian nation in connection with the calamity of the Armenian Genocide. I personally attended the events dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the Genocide. I consider it important to emphasize the role of the Armenian community of Iraq, whose presence in our country dates back to ancient times, about 10 thousand years. The people of Iraq have benefited greatly from the Armenian population, among whom there are doctors, scientists, specialists in various fields."

According to the source, the Prime Minister of Armenia and the President of Iraq discussed issues related to cooperation in the fields of economy, trade, high technologies, energy, water resources, and tourism.

Issues related to regional security and stability, the process of normalization of Armenia-Azerbaijan relations were addressed.

Prime Minister Pashinyan presented the humanitarian problems of more than 100,000 forcibly displaced persons from Nagorno-Karabakh as a result of Azerbaijan's ethnic cleansing policy and the steps taken by the Armenian government to overcome them.




AW: Echoes of vanishing spirituality

My latest visits to Armenia showed me a face of the country where I was born and spent the first 17 years of my life that I had not noticed in the past. Had that face been there forever and I hadn’t seen it because I had been living with it every day, or was I noticing it because I had seen something more positive elsewhere and had a benchmark to compare it to? The face I am talking about is that of aggression – persistent, dangerous aggression, in the most unimportant and minor situations, where a simple smile could solve the issue. 

An accidental bumping of shoulders gives rise to a cycle of, “Look in front of you,” and “Watch how you talk to me,” whereas, in many other countries and cultures, such a scenario would result not in mutual blaming but in mutual apologies, each side taking responsibility for its unintentional carelessness and peacefully resolving the situation. Even worse than when we Armenians walk is what happens when we drive. An endless cycle of loud, repetitive car horns, accompanied by, “Why are you honking at me?” and a series of other exchanges, which sometimes end in swear words and violent remarks, disrupting all traffic for the restoration of the glory of one’s ego. 

I witnessed these examples in Armenia, but the virtual world of our social media platforms is even more mind-blowing than this. Aggressive comments, hate speech and profanity are widespread when someone shares different political views than ours, belongs to a political party that we are against, or simply does not share our way of doing, thinking or saying things. This phenomenon of widespread aggression found both in the offline and online worlds of Armenia is unsuitable for a culture that does not allow swearing when women are present and treats foreign visitors to Armenia with such hospitality and warmheartedness, like long-lost sisters and brothers. So why would we treat our very own compatriot sisters and brothers with an attitude that is in no way comparable to how we treat and even praise foreigners? Why do we take each other for granted? 

I’ve reflected on several potential factors and causes behind this phenomenon. An obvious one for me is the trauma that we as a nation have lived through over the past few years. The wounds of the 1915 Genocide still unhealed, we witnessed numerous other wars and massacres, which left our population in a physically and psychologically devastated state. Parents who lost their sons, children who lost their fathers, men who lost their body parts, thousands who lost their homes, almost everyone lost something: a brother, a sister, a friend, a loved one. We all lost a homeland. And with all those losses stacked up on top of each other, it’s hard not to lose some percentage of sanity. 

That being said, however, I would assume that the shared struggle and suffering would lead us not to aggression but to compassion and mutual support, enhanced care and respect, and unwavering solidarity and unity in the face of a common enemy who is diligently getting ready for another attack. Instead of uniting and preparing to fight the enemy, we are looking for enemies among us, in each others’ eyes, trying to exact revenge on each other. 

Psychological trauma may be one of the reasons behind this aggression, and anger is, oftentimes, a fear response, but there is something happening in our hearts and minds on a much deeper level that does not involve our external circumstances as much as our inherent, unchangeable spiritual nature. There has been a shift, both in Armenia and around the world, away from spirituality. As a result, values of humility, forgiveness, kindness, compassion, patience and peace have been overshadowed by arrogance, resentment, cruelty, indifference, impatience and turmoil.

Armenians so often boast that we were the first nation to adopt Christianity as a state religion, yet we so rarely act according to the Christian values of humility, forgiveness, patience, compassion and love. Many go to church only on special holidays and put effort into cooking the right foods for Christmas and Easter without understanding the real, spiritual significance of these events. Many of us remember God and pray only when we are in need, in the same way that we appreciate water when we are thirsty, that we appreciate our health when we get sick, and, unfortunately, that we appreciate our spiritual sites when they are no longer in the scope of our reach. 

Dadivank, 2017 (Photo: Eric Nazarian)

There are numerous instances when we started to appreciate our geographic, cultural and spiritual gifts only after we lost them, examples both from the past, such as Mount Ararat or Ani (the City of 1,001 Churches), and from the present, such as Dadivank or Holy Savior  Ghazanchetsots Cathedral. I remember in the days after the 2020 Artsakh “ceasefire” agreement, so many buses traveled from all regions of Armenia to Dadivank. For many, it was the first time seeing Dadivank, the first time hearing about it, or the first time understanding the historical, cultural and spiritual significance of the monastery. It was a wake-up call of what we had and what we were losing. The visits were an attempt to see and touch the treasure before it was gone, as if trying to catch the last rays of sun before a cold and gloomy winter. 

Dadivank was, in fact, an astonishing ray of sunshine. Many sources mention that the church was founded as early as at the end of the first century, on top of the burial site of Saint Dadi, who was one of the 70 disciples of the apostle Thaddeus (traditionally one of the two first apostles to Armenia). In total, the site comprises ten buildings, making it one of the most sizable and substantial monastic complexes in medieval Armenia. Many constructions in Dadivank date back to the 5th, 13th and 18th centuries, and feature remarkable pieces of medieval Armenian architecture, bas-relief sculpture and frescoes, as well as over 100 Armenian inscriptions. The exterior arcades – mind-blowing pieces of art – remind the visitor of Ani Cathedral and other 10th-11th century monuments. The whole monument is covered in engraved and painted inscriptions that share the history of the monastery and inform the visitor about the aesthetic aspects and choices of the space. Inscriptions can also be found on the numerous khachkars in and around the monastery and often include powerful prayers for salvation. The foundation inscription of the main Cathedral dates its construction to as early as 1214. 

In the 12th century, Mkhitar Gosh, a prominent Armenian scholar, writer and priest, lived in Dadivank, where he wrote part of his Datastanagirk (Book of Law), which was the first Armenian legal text to cover secular and ecclesiastical matters and became the basis for the legal systems of many other countries around the world. Moreover, according to Arara, during excavations in 2007, the relics of St. Dadi were found in Dadivank. This event, coupled with the information that Dadivank was one of the birthplaces of Datastanagirk and home to numerous important inscriptions and architectural treasures, gives Dadivank a significance not only for Armenians but also for the rest of the Christian world.

The loss of sites such as Dadivank mirrors humanity’s loss of spirituality, or rather our loss of appreciation thereof. But since we, as humans, are spiritual in nature, we cannot afford to lose our spirituality completely.  

The fate of Dadivank and the other Armenian churches and monasteries is alarming and worthy of immediate attention. Some of these sites will be intentionally modified and presented as the heritage of the obscure Albanian-Udi religious community, some will be vandalized and desecrated, and some may be turned into mosques, in a similar fashion in which Hagia Sophia was converted. As alarming and critical as the issue is, the response from the international community in no way aligns with this sense of urgency. While there are wide-ranging reasons for this indifference and inaction, one thing is certain. The loss of sites such as Dadivank mirrors humanity’s loss of spirituality, or rather our loss of appreciation thereof. But since we, as humans, are spiritual in nature, we cannot afford to lose our spirituality completely. 

As much as I am (self-)critical of Armenia, pinpoint its weaknesses and identify pathways for growth, I need to acknowledge that the issue of lost spirituality is not limited to Armenia alone and is now a widespread phenomenon covering much of the world. The results are clear in the loss of thousands of lives around the world. Twenty first-century aggressors have unique preferences for targeting the most vulnerable with the most advanced and cruel equipment of modern science. As aggressive as Armenians can be to each other during day-to-day encounters, we have still preserved the principle of not targeting children and the elderly even in the most heated moments of war. Against the backdrop of Azerbaijan’s violence toward the Armenian POWs, the Armenian side still chose to provide necessary medical treatment to the Azeri soldiers detained by Artsakh’s military. We kept our humanity in some of the most inhumane of situations, and to some degree preserved our sanity even after witnessing the worst possible of scenes. 

Reuniting with spirituality would offer many treasures to humankind. One gift of Christianity is that of prayer. A 2009 research on the effects of prayer on mental health found that “members of a group had lower rates of depression and anxiety and were more optimistic after sessions in which they prayed for one another, compared to the control group (which had no prayer sessions).” The liturgy ceremonies offered in Armenian churches are a great opportunity for the Armenian community to gather (both in Armenia and abroad), pray and move closer to our true origins, to our real nature made in the image of God.

Interestingly, many of us have heard this short part of the Latin proverb “Homo homini lupus” (i.e. “A man is a wolf to another man”), yet very few know the whole phrase, which says, “Lupus est homo homini, non homo, quom qualis sit non novit,” which translates to, “One man to another is a wolf, not a man, when he doesn’t know what sort he is.” We should relearn what sort we really belong to, and, when we do, we will no longer be wolves to each other. We will reconnect with the values of love, peace, patience, forgiveness, kindness and compassion. Then there will be hope, for Armenians and for the rest of the world.

Milena Baghdasaryan is a graduate from UWC Changshu China. Since the age of 11, she has been writing articles for a local newspaper named Kanch ('Call'). At the age of 18, she published her first novel on Granish.org and created her own blog, Taghandi Hetqerov ('In the Pursuit of Talent')—a portal devoted to interviewing young and talented Armenians all around the world. Baghdasaryan considers storytelling, traveling and learning new languages to be critical in helping one explore the world, connect with others, and discover oneself. Milena currently studies Film and New Media at New York University in Abu Dhabi.


Creating inspirational memories for our children

This is the season of Thanksgiving in the United States. Aside from overeating and football games, it is an opportunity to reflect on what we are thankful for. We should always be grateful for our loved ones, friendships, professional success and health. It has been particularly difficult to remain positive this year after the horrifying atrocities in Artsakh. Our lives are dependent on hope. Its absence enables darkness where light once existed. This is our current challenge, as we struggle to absorb the impact of our latest tragedy. As many have stated, there is no time for brooding, as the lives and security of thousands of our brethren are at stake. While we may be consumed with human emotion, it is important to always seek hope. 

The most sustainable source of hope is, of course, our faith. The good news of our Lord has the power to wash away darkness and bring joy into our existence. This year, Armenians in the eastern United States have been blessed to receive His Holiness Aram I, Catholicos of the Great House of Cilicia, during his pontifical journey in November. This is his first of a two-part visit, which will be completed with a second trip in 2024. His Holiness is the latest of an outstanding group of clerical leaders from the Cilician See. He was mentored by the iconic Karekin I of blessed memory and has provided stellar leadership in both Armenian and ecumenical circles. 

A pontifical visit is a special time for the faithful to receive the blessing of their spiritual leader. Catholicos Aram I is well known in the Prelacy community going back to his younger days in the early 1970s when he completed an advanced degree in the United States. Due in large part to our unfortunate chronic administrative division in North America, he was relatively unknown for many years by our fellow Armenians who are affiliated with the Etchmiadzin dioceses. In 2015, during the united centennial commemoration of the Armenian Genocide, he captivated thousands with his public addresses at various events, mostly notably in Washington, D.C. As the barriers of our division are slowly removed, the global Armenian nation has become more familiar with this renowned leader of our church. 

His Holiness Aram I is greeted by the children of St. Sarkis Church in New York on November 17, 2023 (Photo: Armenian Church Catholicosate of Cilicia)

During his current pontifical visit, he has focused on parishes in the mid-Atlantic region, New York and Connecticut. It is gratifying that many diocesan clergy have attended the religious and social events connected to his visit. I have high expectations and had hoped that His Holiness would conduct a Hrashapar service at the diocesan St. Vartan’s Cathedral as a sign of our eternal unity. Nevertheless, we should all be pleased with the brotherly love expressed between all our clergy. During the Artsakh invasion and deportation, a united prayer service was held at St. Stephen’s in Watertown followed by a public gathering at the local community center. Both events were well attended, and many clergy from the Prelacy and Diocese led the prayer service. Of particular note was the presence of His Grace Mesrob Parsamyan, the Primate of the Eastern Diocese. This was a wonderful statement of unity in a time of crisis. Bishop Parsamyan, who was in town for other activities, could have easily elected to pass on the service. Instead he focused on our common cause for Artsakh, pan-Armenian Christian love, and the responsibility of the church to provide leadership. Archbishop Anoushavan Tanielian of the Prelacy has made many similar examples of leadership in New York with the diocese. We are blessed to have two open-minded leaders of our church.

During the activities of the Vehapar’s visit, I have looked for the role and presence of our youth. In each community, two young people would greet the Vehapar with our wonderful tradition of the bread and salt. Watching the young people interact with His Holiness as greeters, performers or while serving their parishes, I was reminded of the impact these visits can have on our young generation. In 1957, the group of churches that had been “unaffiliated” due to the division had petitioned the Great House of Cilicia for affiliation. This was a difficult and courageous decision. The prospects for reunification were poor, and these parishes were growing but in need of sustainable infrastructure. Catholicos Zareh I of blessed memory sent the then Prelate of Lebanon, Archbishop Khoren Paroyan (later Catholicos Khoren I) to America to observe and organize. He traveled to every community with escorts from each parish. 

Our parish in Indian Orchard, St. Gregory the Illuminator, was to receive then Archbishop Paroyan at the Massachusetts Turnpike exit while he was traveling from the Worcester church. My father was a relatively young deacon and leader of the community. He was a part of the reception group and also an early supporter of the Prelacy. In those days, each Turnpike exit had a parking lot at the toll gates. My father asked me, or more likely told me gently, that I would present flowers to the Prelate and offer a short greeting. I was six years old and petrified. When the Archbishop arrived and stepped out of the vehicle, I was amazed by this impressive man, with his clerical hood and flowing black garments. He carried a staff and had a natural warm smile that would move his beard. On my father’s cue, I went up to him, presented the flowers and offered a three sentence greeting. It was windy that day, and he embraced me as I got lost in his swirling robes. I can still feel the velvet texture on my cheek. I felt so special at that moment. When he returned years later as Vehapar, he remembered me and let me try on his pontifical ring. On that day in the late 1950s, my lifelong love of our church and a special respect for our clergy began in its infancy. This week, I have prayed that other young people will be inspired by the visit of Catholicos Aram. As we age, in whatever capacity we serve our community, it is our responsibility to mentor and motivate others. Sometimes it’s as simple as making a six-year-old kid feel special. The late Vehapar understood the importance of his visit that year, not simply in meeting with the lay leadership, but in inspiring the youth as a foundation for their lifelong faith.

This past weekend our parish, Holy Translators, celebrated a dual anniversary. It is the 20th anniversary of the parish’s consecration and the 25th anniversary of the holy ordination of our pastor, Rev. Fr. Krikor Sabounjian. During the Holy Badarak, 14 young men served on the altar. They represented acolytes and subdeacons who were mentored by Der Krikor over the last several years. Several are away at college or have professional lives in other cities, but they returned to honor the man who inspired them. This is one of the beauties of our church, where several generations form a bond based on their love of God. The Primate Bishop Parsamyan joined the community for the weekend’s celebratory activities. He is a young man in his early forties, and I marveled at how he interacted with the young and elders with ease. Each individual conversation in a crowded room was unique, and those of us on the receiving end appreciate the integrity of his attention. The ability of our church leaders to build impactful relationships with our youth is at the top of my list of qualifications. It is gratifying to know that our church in this region is led by two individuals with the humility and love to effectively communicate with our children, young professionals and young parents. 

When our church leaders internalize the impact they can have on young people, the probability of sustainability is reasonably high. As they get older, service enters into the equation to define an identity and cement the bond.

Our presence in the church is about relationships with our heavenly Father and those who serve His church. I didn’t realize it at that moment, but my encounter with the Catholicos many years ago opened a lifelong path that I followed. We must constantly encourage the youth. Our grandson, Krikor, is four years old. His sister Anoush and our extended family worship at the same parish. Similar to many kids his age, he had his eyes on the fellowship food table. While standing near the table and waiting for Der Hayr to bless the food, a simple but beautiful experience occurred. Der Hayr asked Krikor to stand next to him while he offered a prayer. Krikor complied, because he feels a kinship to Der Hayr, as they have the same first name. After Der Hayr concluded the prayer, he asked Krikor to say “Amen” and cross himself. Young Krikor felt special and wanted. Connecting our children to church is not complicated. It requires repetitive attendance, so that our children feel that attending church is a part of their routine. It gets more complex when they are older, but not when building a foundation. When our church leaders internalize the impact they can have on young people, the probability of sustainability is reasonably high. As they get older, service enters into the equation to define an identity and cement the bond.

It gives me such joy to witness young couples who bring their children to church regularly. They were taught well and understand that spirituality is a part of family life. There is no substitute for attendance and participation. Likewise, only those with wisdom can provide the inspiration of making a child feel a special connection. The best community leaders realize that at some point their role is less about active management and more about using their acquired knowledge to inspire others. I will always remember that exact location on the Mass. Turnpike parking lot where my journey began. Whether it is a pontifical visit, community celebration or a regular Sunday, let’s find ways to gift our youth that special experience that will inspire them for a lifetime. It is the best investment we will ever make.

Columnist
Stepan was raised in the Armenian community of Indian Orchard, MA at the St. Gregory Parish. A former member of the AYF Central Executive and the Eastern Prelacy Executive Council, he also served many years as a delegate to the Eastern Diocesan Assembly. Currently , he serves as a member of the board and executive committee of the National Association for Armenian Studies and Research (NAASR). He also serves on the board of the Armenian Heritage Foundation. Stepan is a retired executive in the computer storage industry and resides in the Boston area with his wife Susan. He has spent many years as a volunteer teacher of Armenian history and contemporary issues to the young generation and adults at schools, camps and churches. His interests include the Armenian diaspora, Armenia, sports and reading.


RFE/RL Armenian Service – 11/22/2023

                                        Wednesday, 


Armenia Signals Readiness ‘To Reengage’ In Peace Process After Azerbaijan’s 
‘Direct Talks’ Offer


The Armenian Foreign Ministry building in Yerevan (file photo)


Armenia has reaffirmed its readiness to “re-engage in negotiations” with 
Azerbaijan to establish peace between the two countries, its Foreign Ministry 
said on Wednesday in response to Baku’s offer of “direct talks” with Yerevan.

Azerbaijan’s Foreign Ministry called on November 21 for direct negotiations with 
Armenia in a “mutually acceptable” venue, including at the Armenian-Azerbaijani 
border.

Baku’s call came after what appears to be Baku’s rejection of Western mediation 
efforts in the process of settling relations with Armenia.

It also followed the announcement by Armenia’s Foreign Ministry that Yerevan had 
submitted another proposal on a peace agreement to Azerbaijan following Prime 
Minister Nikol Pashinian’s call on November 18 for “intensifying diplomatic 
efforts to achieve the signing of a peace treaty.”

In its statement today the Armenian Foreign Ministry emphasized that official 
Yerevan is ready to re-engage in negotiations, having as a benchmark “mutual 
recognition and respect for each other’s territorial integrity without 
ambiguities, implementation of the further border delimitation based on the 
[1991] Alma-Ata Declaration and the latest legitimate Soviet maps, the 
unblocking of the region’s infrastructures based on the principles of full 
respect for the sovereignty, jurisdiction, reciprocity and equality of the 
states.”

It said that “despite all the complications and challenges” official Yerevan 
sees “a real possibility of establishing peace between the two countries, which 
can be realized if there is political will on both sides, and the Armenian side 
has that will.”

The Armenian ministry stressed that “one of the expressions of this will is also 
the fact that Armenia proposed to Azerbaijan to hold a meeting of border 
delimitation commissions on the state frontier between the two countries.”

Earlier, Azerbaijan accused Armenia of delaying its reply to Baku’s proposal on 
a peace agreement submitted to Yerevan in September for more than two months.

Stressing that Yerevan submitted its sixth proposal related to the draft peace 
agreement to Baku on November 21, the Armenian Foreign Ministry said: “While, 
after receiving the latest Azerbaijani proposals, Armenia was considering them 
and was ready to continue negotiations on the draft agreement, on September 19 
Azerbaijan carried out a large-scale military attack against the people of 
Nagorno-Karabakh, which led to the forced displacement of the entire Armenian 
population of Nagorno-Karabakh.”

The Azerbaijani leadership appeared to be avoiding meetings with the Armenian 
side held with Western mediation after Baku established full control over 
Nagorno-Karabakh in the one-day lightening offensive in September.

Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev and Armenia’s Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian 
were scheduled to meet on the sidelines of the EU’s October 5 summit in Granada, 
Spain, for talks mediated by French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor 
Olaf Scholz, and European Council President Charles Michel.

Pashinian had hoped that they would sign there a document laying out the main 
parameters of an Armenian-Azerbaijani peace treaty. However, Aliyev withdrew 
from the talks at the last minute.

Baku cited France’s allegedly “biased position” against Azerbaijan as the reason 
for skipping those talks in Spain.

The Azerbaijani leader also appears to have canceled another meeting which the 
EU’s Michel planned to host in Brussels in late October.

Most recently Azerbaijan refused to attend a meeting with Armenia at the level 
of foreign ministers in Washington after allegedly “one-sided and biased” 
remarks by a senior U.S. official made during a congressional hearing on 
Nagorno-Karabakh. That meeting had reportedly been scheduled to take place on 
November 20.

The Armenian ministry also stressed today that the Azerbaijani side did not 
participate in the meetings at the level of the countries’ leaders first in 
Granada and then in Brussels.

It said that “those five-way and three-way meetings had previously been agreed 
upon, and Yerevan considered it to be more efficient to present [its latest 
proposals] to Azerbaijan during those meetings.”

“Nevertheless, in order to prevent attempts to deadlock the negotiation process 
and achieve lasting peace in our region, the Republic of Armenia constructively 
conveyed its observations on the [draft] agreement,” the statement said.




Armenia ‘Inclined’ To Continue Talks With Azerbaijan Through EU Mediation

        • Astghik Bedevian

European Council President Charles Michel hosts talks between Armenian Prime 
Minister Nikol Pashinian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev in Brussels, May 
14, 2023.


Yerevan is inclined to continue talks between the leaders of Armenia and 
Azerbaijan in the Brussels format, through the mediation of President of the 
European Council Charles Michel, an ally of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol 
Pashinian in parliament said on Wednesday.

Azerbaijan’s Foreign Ministry called on November 21 for direct negotiations with 
Armenia in a “mutually acceptable” venue, including at the Armenian-Azerbaijani 
border.

Baku’s call came after what appears to be Baku’s rejection of Western mediation 
efforts in the process of normalizing relations with Armenia.

Responding to the statement from Baku, Armenia’s Foreign Ministry today 
reaffirmed Yerevan’s readiness to “re-engage in negotiations” with Baku to 
establish peace between the two South Caucasus nations.

In particular, it mentioned a possible meeting at the state frontier of Armenian 
and Azerbaijani members of commissions involved in border delimitation and 
demarcation processes, something that it said Yerevan had already proposed 
earlier. The Armenian ministry stopped short, however, of mentioning the 
possibility of direct Armenian-Azerbaijani talks at the highest level.

Sargis Khandanian, who represents the pro-government Civil Contract faction and 
heads the Armenian National Assembly’s Foreign Relations Commission, told 
RFE/RL’s Armenian Service today that the main principles for 
Armenian-Azerbaijani normalization, including mutual recognition of territorial 
integrity and borders based on a 1991 declaration signed by a dozen former 
Soviet republics, including Armenia and Azerbaijan, after the collapse of the 
USSR, and the sovereign jurisdictions of the states over transportation links 
passing through their territories, were agreed upon by the parties in July when 
the latest round of EU-mediated talks was held between Pashinian and Azerbaijani 
President Ilham Aliyev.

“Based on this logic, it is necessary to ensure the continuity of those 
negotiations and continue meetings at the level of the countries’ leaders 
through the mediation of the European Union, in particular, European Council 
President Charles Michel,” Khandanian said.

“But we saw that Azerbaijan rejected both meetings that were scheduled in 
Granada and Brussels. Nevertheless, Armenia continues to adhere to this logic 
and wants to achieve settlement within this framework,” the pro-government 
Armenian lawmaker said.

A member of the Armenian opposition, meanwhile, pointed to dangers in 
Azerbaijan’s offer. Armen Rustamian from the Hayastan faction said that by 
boycotting Western platforms Aliyev wants to achieve face-to-face meetings or 
meetings through Russia’s mediation “in order to get what he wants” under the 
2020 Moscow-brokered ceasefire agreement for Nagorno-Karabakh, namely, a land 
corridor to Azerbaijan’s western exclave of Nakhichevan via Armenia.

“He has already got what he needed from the West and he doesn’t have any 
problems there. That’s why he says: if you want to continue calling me to the 
West with your logic, I won’t come. Your alternative is either to return to the 
field of the [Moscow-brokered] trilateral agreements or we negotiate face to 
face,” Rustamian said.




Germany Announces Aid To Armenia


Parliamentary State Secretary at Germany’s Federal Ministry for Economic 
Cooperation and Development Niels Annen (L) and Armenia’s Minister of Economy 
Vahan Kerobian at a joint press conference in Yerevan. .


The government in Berlin will provide 84.6 million euros (about $92.2 million) 
in aid to Armenia in the form of grants and loans, a German official announced 
on Wednesday.

Speaking at a joint press conference with Armenia’s Minister of Economy Vahan 
Kerobian in Yerevan, Parliamentary State Secretary at Germany’s Federal Ministry 
for Economic Cooperation and Development Niels Annen said that “it is a clear 
message to the whole world that Germany and Armenia are opening a new way of 
cooperation.”

“Armenia has once again proven that it is committed to democracy, a democratic 
society,” the German official stressed.

The announcement came after two-day intergovernmental negotiations focused on 
developing Armenian-German cooperation that were held in Yerevan on November 
21-22.

Earlier this week, the United States announced more than $4.1 million in 
additional humanitarian assistance for Armenians affected by the situation in 
Nagorno-Karabakh.

The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), through which the 
assistance will be provided, said that this funding will increase “life-saving 
food assistance and provide humanitarian protection and emergency shelter” for 
almost 74,000 out of more than 100,000 Armenians displaced from Nagorno-Karabakh 
after Azerbaijan’s military operation in September.

It said that the additional funding brings total U.S. humanitarian assistance 
for the Nagorno-Karabakh response to nearly $28 million since 2020.

Meanwhile, the Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations announced on Wednesday 
that it will deliver 40 tons of humanitarian aid to Armenia for “citizens who 
were forced to leave the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh.”

It said that the aid, which includes food, blankets and a mobile power station, 
is organized at the direction of the president of Russia and on behalf of the 
government of the Russian Federation.




Moscow Sees ‘Camouflaged’ Efforts By Yerevan To Change Foreign-Policy Vector


Maria Zakharova, an official representative of the Foreign Ministry of Russia 
(file photo)


Russia sees a “radical change” in Armenia’s foreign-policy orientation despite 
what its Foreign Ministry’s spokesperson has described as Yerevan’s attempts to 
“camouflage” it with its rhetoric.

At a press briefing in Moscow on Wednesday Maria Zakharova jibed at statements 
made by Armenian officials, including Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian, about 
“diversifying of Armenia’s foreign policy without changing the vector.”

“One would also like to hear how they see it in practice,” Zakharova said, as 
quoted by Russia’s TASS news agency.

She said the kind of rhetoric is “a blatant attempt to hide true intentions.”

“It is clear that the matter concerns a radical change in the republic’s 
orientation in foreign affairs,” she said, claiming that Yerevan is changing its 
foreign-policy vector “clearly at the suggestion or prompting of the West.”

“On the other hand, they are trying to camouflage it in every possible way, 
thinking that this way they can maintain the same level of assistance and 
special relationship. This is all so visible and clear that it is impossible to 
hide it all behind such words or formulations,” Zakharova said.

In his recent public remarks Pashinian has criticized Russia, a formal military 
and political ally of Yerevan, for failing to come to Armenia’s aid in its 
disputes with Azerbaijan, including a series of recent deadly border clashes as 
a result of which Armenia says some of its territories were occupied.

Tensions between Armenia and Russia rose further after Azerbaijan’s September 
19-20 military offensive in Nagorno-Karabakh that led to the exodus of the 
region’s virtually entire ethnic Armenian population. Armenia, in particular, 
blamed Russian peacekeepers deployed in Nagorno-Karabakh under the 2020 
ceasefire agreement between Moscow, Baku and Yerevan for failing to protect the 
local Armenians.

Pashinian defended his government’s policy that he said was aimed at 
diversifying relations in the security sphere as he addressed the parliament in 
Yerevan on November 15.

The day before that the Armenian leader announced his decision not to attend an 
upcoming summit of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), a 
Russia-led defense bloc of six former Soviet countries that also includes 
Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan.

Earlier this year Armenia also declined to participate in CSTO military drills, 
while hosting joint exercises with the United States military in Yerevan. This 
and several other moves by Yerevan drew angry reactions from Russia that has 
accused the Pashinian administration of systematically “destroying” relations 
with Moscow.

During today’s press briefing Russia’s Zakharova lamented Yerevan’s decision not 
to attend the CSTO’s November 23 summit and meetings at the level of ministers 
prior to it.

“We do not believe that it meets the long-term interests of the Armenian people 
and will contribute to the strengthening of security and stability of this 
friendly country,” she said.

At the same time, Zakharova said that Armenia is not going to block the work of 
the CSTO’s statutory bodies or prevent the approval of documents that have 
already been agreed.

“This essentially leaves the door open for Yerevan and allows it to join the 
work in the future, and we hope that [our] Armenian ally will use this 
opportunity in the near future,” she concluded.




Another Armenian Official To Skip CSTO Event
Նոյեմբեր 22, 2023

Armenian Parliament Speaker Alen Simonian attending the European Conference of 
Speakers of Parliaments of the Council of Europe in Dublin, the Republic of 
Ireland, September 29, 2023.


Armenian Parliament Speaker Alen Simonian said on Wednesday that he will not 
attend an upcoming event of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) 
as Armenia’s prime minister and other officials have skipped the Russia-led 
defense bloc’s meetings being held in Minsk, Belarus, this week.

Simonian said that he had informed his CSTO colleagues that he would not attend 
the event that he said is scheduled for December.

“There is no answer from them until now. And I think there won’t be. I am sure 
that the reasons for my not participating are clear to them,” said Alen 
Simonian, denying, at the same time, that this amounts to “freezing of 
relations.”

“Armenia does not have a decision to withdraw from the CSTO, but I believe that 
my participation in the given event is not appropriate in the current situation. 
And the situation is that the CSTO does not fulfill its obligations and did not 
fulfill its obligations in the past either,” the Armenian parliament speaker 
said.

Earlier this month Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian announced that he 
will not attend the CSTO summit due to be held in Minsk on November 23. 
Armenia’s foreign minister and defense minister are not attending the meetings 
of their colleagues gathering in the Belarusian capital on Wednesday either.

CSTO Secretary-General Imangali Tasmagambetov said earlier this week that 
official Yerevan had asked to remove the issue of providing military assistance 
to Armenia from the summit agenda.

Armenia had appealed to the CSTO for military assistance in September 2022 
following two-day deadly border clashes with Azerbaijan that Yerevan said 
stemmed from Baku’s aggression against sovereign Armenian territory.

The Russia-led bloc that also includes Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and 
Tajikistan did not publicly call Azerbaijan the aggressor and refused to back 
Armenia militarily, while agreeing to consider sending an observation mission to 
the South Caucasus country.

At the CSTO summit held in Yerevan in November 2022 Armenia declined such a 
mission, saying that before it could be carried out it needed to give a clear 
political assessment of what Yerevan said was Azerbaijan’s aggression and 
occupation of sovereign Armenian territory.

Explaining his decision to skip the Minsk summit, the Armenian prime minister 
told the parliament in Yerevan earlier this month that the “fundamental problem” 
with the CSTO was that this organization had refused “to de-jure fixate its area 
of responsibility in Armenia.”

“In these conditions this could mean that by silently participating [in the 
summit] we could join the logic that would question Armenia’s territorial 
integrity and sovereignty. We can’t allow ourselves to do such a thing, and by 
making such decisions [not to attend CSTO gatherings] we give the CSTO and 
ourselves time to think over further actions,” Pashinian said.

During the November 15 question-and-answer session in parliament the Armenian 
leader refused to be drawn into the discussion of whether Armenia planned to 
formally quit the CSTO, nor would he speak about any security alternatives to 
membership in this organization.

“We are not planning to announce a change in our policy in strategic terms as 
long as we haven’t made a decision to quit the CSTO,” Pashinian said.

Dmitry Peskov, a spokesman for Russian President Vladimir Putin, on Wednesday 
again lamented the decision by the Armenian leader not to attend the Minsk 
summit of the CSTO. But he added, according to Russia’s TASS news agency, that 
the Kremlin expects that “Armenia will continue its work within the framework of 
the organization.”



Reposted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2023 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 

Armenian Foreign Minister holds phone talk with Belarusian counterpart

 21:06,

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 21, ARMENPRESS. On the initiative of the Belarusian side, on November 21, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia Ararat Mirzoyan held a phone talk with the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Belarus Sergei  Aleinik, the foreign ministry said.

During the telephone conversation, ideas were exchanged on the Armenian-Belarusian bilateral agenda.

Issues related to CSTO activities were also discussed during the phone conversation. Armenian Foreign Minister noted that he would not be able to participate in the joint session of the CSTO Council of Foreign Ministers, the Council of Defense Ministers and the Committee of Secretaries of the Security Council scheduled for November 22 in Minsk.

Turkish Press: Azerbaijan calls on Armenia to avoid ‘unnecessary delays’ in peace talks

Yeni Safak, Turkey
Nov 21 2023

Azerbaijan calls on Armenia to avoid ‘unnecessary delays’ in peace talks

‘It took Armenia almost two and a half months to respond to Azerbaijan’s proposals on draft peace agreement, which has seriously delayed process,’ says Foreign Ministry

Azerbaijan on Tuesday called on Armenia to avoid any “unnecessary delays” in peace talks between the two countries.

“It took Armenia almost two and a half months to respond to Azerbaijan’s proposals on the draft peace agreement, which has seriously delayed the process,” said an Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry statement.

“This stagnation in the peace negotiations does not contribute to stability and prosperity in the region,” it added.

The statement reiterated Azerbaijan’s readiness to hold talks with Armenia to finalize a peace agreement between both countries “as soon as possible.”

“Responsibility for the continuation of the peace process, including the selection of a mutually acceptable venue, or a decision to meet at the state border, belongs to the two countries,” it said.

Earlier in the day, the Armenian Foreign Ministry announced on X that Yerevan submitted a sixth proposal to Azerbaijan for a peace agreement.

Relations between the two former Soviet republics have been tense since 1991, when the Armenian military occupied Nagorno-Karabakh, a territory internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan, and seven adjacent regions.

Most of the territory was liberated by Azerbaijan during a war in the fall of 2020, which ended after a Russian-brokered peace agreement, and also opened the door to normalization.

This September, the Azerbaijani army initiated an anti-terrorism operation in Karabakh to establish constitutional order in the region, after which illegal separatist forces in the region surrendered.

Azerbaijan, having now established full sovereignty in the region, has reiterated its request to the Armenian population in Karabakh to become part of Azerbaijani society.


Tensions Rise as Azerbaijan Snubs U.S.-Mediated Peace Talks

Nov 20 2023

  • Azerbaijan canceled a scheduled meeting in Washington after criticizing the U.S.'s stance on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and support for Armenia.
  • The U.S. has shown increased support for Armenia's reforms and is investigating events in Nagorno-Karabakh, causing diplomatic tensions with Azerbaijan.
  • Azerbaijan favors mediation by regional powers like Russia, Turkey, and Iran, questioning the neutrality of Western involvement in the peace process.

Azerbaijan continues to refuse to attend peace talks with Armenia, citing what it calls the biased approach of Western mediating countries. This time it was the U.S. that displeased Azerbaijan. 

On November 16, Azerbaijan's Foreign Ministry put out a statement announcing the country's decision not to attend a meeting of the Armenian and Azerbaijani foreign ministers in Washington scheduled for four days later.

The snub was in large part a response to U.S. Assistant Secretary of State James O'Brien's testimony the previous day at a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing titled "The Future of Nagorno-Karabakh." He told the committee that the U.S. was working on establishing a "comprehensive, thorough and transparent" record of what happened in the formerly Armenian-populated enclave before and during Azerbaijan's September military takeover. 

"We have commissioned independent investigators, we have our own investigators working in the field. There is information available from international non-governmental organizations and other investigators. And as we develop the record of what happened, we will be completely open about what we are finding. I can't put a timeline on this investigation, but we will inform you as we go forward," he said. 

O'Brien went on to express support for Armenia, which has been attempting a pivot away from Russia and is scrambling to accommodate the 100,000-some people displaced from Nagorno-Karabakh in September. 

"I am very impressed by the Armenian government's commitment to reforms and diversifying the relationships that it has – economic, political, energy and security – particularly in the Trans-Atlantic community," he said. "And I think we owe it to the people of Armenia to help them through this difficult situation so that those choices they have made very bravely are able to help them to make them have a more secure, stable and prosperous future." 

O'Brien also said that the U.S. had canceled high-level bilateral meetings and engagements with Azerbaijan (without specifying exactly when) and would keep urging Baku to "facilitate the return of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians who may wish to go back to their homes or visit cultural sites in the region, as well as restore unimpeded commercial, humanitarian, and pedestrian traffic to the region."

In its statement the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry called the hearing "a blow to the Azerbaijan-U.S. relations in bilateral and multilateral formats."

"The groundless accusations voiced against Azerbaijan are irrelevant and undermine peace and security in the region," the statement read. 

On the day of the hearing, the U.S. Senate also adopted a bill titled "Armenian Protection Act of 2023". If it becomes law, the bill will suspend all military aid to Azerbaijan by repealing the Freedom Support Act Section 907 waiver authority for the Administration with respect to assistance to Azerbaijan for the years 2024 and 2025.

On that front, Azerbaijan's diplomatic body argued that the U.S. was repeating "the same mistake" it made in 1992, when Azerbaijan was sanctioned with this amendment, "despite being a state who faced aggression and occupation" at the hands of Armenian forces.

Also on November 16, the U.S. reaffirmed its support for Armenia-Azerbaijan rapprochement irrespective of who mediates. "We would encourage the two parties to engage in those talks, whether they are here, whether they are somewhere else, and that'll continue to be our policy," spokesperson of the U.S. State Department Matthew Miller told a briefing.

Baku for its part does not seem interested in the U.S. having an active role in those talks. For some months now, it has been expressing distaste with Western-brokered negotiations and instead shown a preference for regional mediators like Russia, Turkey, and Iran. 

And its latest statement, the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry warned that, "[S]uch a unilateral approach by the United States could lead to the loss of the mediation role of the United States."

By Heydar Isayev via Eurasianet.org

https://oilprice.com/Geopolitics/International/Tensions-Rise-as-Azerbaijan-Snubs-US-Mediated-Peace-Talks.html