At PACE, Pashinyan Outlines Terms for Karabakh Peace

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan addresses the plenary session of the Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe in Strasbourg, France

Prime Minister says Yerevan will not negotiate with Turkey as long as Ankara sets  preconditions.  Wants to directly address people of Azerbaijan

STRASBOURG, France—During a presentation at the plenary session of PACE on Thursday, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan reiterated that the Karabakh conflict cannot be resolved without direct participation of Artsakh and vehemently rejected notions that such a position was aimed at altering the format of the ongoing OSCE Minsk Group-mediated peace talks.

In the same context, Pashinyan was clear to tell the Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe delegates that Armenia continued to offer dialogue with Turkey without preconditions, pointing out, however, that Ankara continues to impose preconditions by calling for a resolution to the Karabakh conflict in favor of Azerbaijan.

“In our view, there are several important issues that we need to discuss in order to strengthen the peace agenda on institutional terms. One of these issues is the complete implementation of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairmanship format which also supposes the participation of the Nagorno-Karabakh representatives to the peace process because it’s very difficult to understand how we are going to resolve the issue without listening and talking to the main side of the conflict,” said Pashinyan. “Our efforts are aimed at restoring the dialogue between Azerbaijan and Nagorno Karabakh within the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairmanship. “

He explained that during the early days of the conflict resolution negotiations, elected officials from the Nagorno-Karabakh were participants in the peace talks, explaining that it just so happened that those very individuals went on to become leaders of the Republic of Armenia, and continued to negotiate with Azerbaijani leaders.

“Our task today is to create conditions for the dialogue between Nagorno Karabakh and Azerbaijan not to stop. And this is a very important obligation,” explained Pashinyan.

“In recent times, presenting proposals to our Azerbaijani partners and its society aimed at implementing a peace formula is one of our key objectives. I am happy that Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev and I have managed to hold direct, sincere and constructive talks,” said Pashinyan.

“Unfortunately, we still don’t have common views on the mechanisms of the nuances of the conflict resolution. But the fact that we managed to create an atmosphere for constructive and sincere discussion is already quite good,” explained Pashinyan.

The prime minister categorically rejected a notion put forth by a Turkish member of PACE who questioned whether Yerevan was attempting to alter or change the course and format of the talks. In responding to the Turkish representative’s inquiry, he, once again, reiterated that Karabakh was part of the negotiation process in the early days of the talks.

“When we reflect of history, as to what the OSCE Minsk Group is and how it was created, we see that the participation of Artsakh representatives in the negotiations process was implied. Not only was this implied, this also took place,” said Pashinyan. “In the 1990s a meeting between Azerbaijani President Heydar Aliyev and Artsakh’s President Robert Kocharian took place in Moscow.”

Pashninyan also slammed rhetoric being used by Azerbaijan to describe Armenians as “occupiers.”

“The word occupation is often used. However, people who live in Karabakh, who were born in Karabakh and their grandparents have lived there, how can they be occupying [the land]? How can a person occupy a territory where they themselves were born, where their children were born and were their ancestors were born, lived and are buried?” said Pashinyan, adding that Yerevan’s agenda was to resolve matters that befits the 21st century and not to destroy one another. He said he would like the opportunity to bring his message of peace directly to the people of Azerbaijan.

Within the same context, Pashinyan also discussed Armenia’s relations with its neighbors, pointing out despite non-friendly relations with Turkey and Azerbaijan, Armenia enjoys extremely good relations with Georgia and Iran.

“You know that unfortunately we do not have diplomatic ties with Turkey and Azerbaijan, and this says it all. The case of Azerbaijan is clear for us all. While Turkey links the establishment of relations with Armenia with our relations with Azerbaijan,” Pashinyan told the PACE delegates.

Pashinyan noted that Armenia has not changed its stance on establishing relations with Turkey, and that Armenia sees relations with neighbors within the agenda of peace.

“Armenia in turn hasn’t changed its stance, we’ve said that we are ready to establish relations with Turkey without pre-conditions, regarding our relations with Azerbaijan I have already generally outlined our perceptions and I would like to stress that we see our relations with Azerbaijan, as well as other neighbors, within context of peace,” said Pashinyan.

Turkish Press: Press release regarding the motion of the Chamber of Deputies of Italy

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Turkey
NO: 95, 10 APRIL 2019, PRESS RELEASE REGARDING THE MOTION OF THE CHAMBER OF DEPUTIES OF ITALY, CALLING FOR THE RECOGNITION OF THE EVENTS OF 1915 AS GENOCIDE BY THE ITALIAN GOVERNMENT

ANKARA, Turkey

The following information was released by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Turkey:

The motion, adopted on by the Chamber of Deputies of Italy, is a new example of using Armenian claims for domestic political interests. We condemn this motion in the strongest terms.

It is not surprising that this motion was drafted by the Lega Party, led by Matteo Salvini, who is committed to sabotaging the relations between Turkey and Italy.

What is surprising and upsetting is that the above-mentioned Chamber has become an instrument in the play staged by the Lega Party, which aims at strengthening its position in the European Parliament elections.

Actually, Armenian claims being continuously put forward before elections or in the context of anti-Turkish sentiments, clearly reveals the political nature of these claims and their incompatibility with historical facts. These efforts do not provide benefit to any party and also stonewall the way for all well-intentioned, forward-looking initiatives.

It is inevitable that this motion will have various repercussions on our relations with our strategic partner, Italy, with which we have historical bonds and considerable trade relations.

As all other initiatives politicizing history, this motion is null and void for Turkey.

Sports: 15-strong Armenia squad is among 4000 wrestlers competing in Tallinn

MediaMax, Armenia
15-strong Armenia squad is among 4000 wrestlers competing in Tallinn

This is the second time Armenian athletes compete in the tournament, previously participating in it in 2017. The youngsters are accompanied by Gor Abgaryan and an assistant coach.

Abgaryan has told Mediamax Sport that 4000 wrestlers from 29 countries will be involved in the tournament. They are going to wrestle on 14 mats simultaneously.

“Our squad has 15 athletes, three of them are girls. We hope to repeat the success of 2017 and win medals. Our youngest wrestler is 10 years old and the eldest is 19,” added Abgaryan.

The three girls are Ani Arakelyan, Satenik Aramyan and Shishanik Harutyunyan. The Tallinn tournament is important for everyone in the squad as a good opportunity to gain experience and test their abilities.

All 4000 wrestlers will hold a joint 4-day training camp after the tournament.

EPIC Resident Anahit Mkrtchyan Determined to Transform Armenia Inspired by EPIC’s First Industry Tour to Beirut

American University of Armenia
40 Marshal Baghramyan Ave., Yerevan 0019, Republic of Armenia  
Tel: (+374 10) 32 40 40; (+374 60) 69 40 40 | Fax:  (+374 60) 61 25 12  

Webpage: www.aua.am

Have you ever returned to your homeland with the desire to transform it into one of the most economically developed countries, fully aware that it can become a reality?

I believe the story that has brought me and 12 other youths like me to this consciousness is worth sharing.

We are young entrepreneurs who are trying to make Armenia a better place by creating our businesses from the ground up and trying to increase knowledge at every opportunity.

One such opportunity was our admission to EPIC [Entrepreneurship and Product Innovation Center], one of the leading organizations in Armenia that helps young people become future entrepreneurs.

At one time, like all others, I also thought that it was impossible to start a business in Armenia because certain unfavorable conditions do not allow even thinking about taking that risk.

Coming to EPIC and meeting the best Armenian entrepreneurs and a number of successful people, one realizes that there is nothing impossible and that today’s Armenia is ready to welcome the young generation and their innovative ideas.

As for the trip to Beirut, I would like to thank EPIC and Tamar Capital that sponsored the event and organized our Lebanon trip, which aimed at exchanging best practices and getting acquainted with local Armenian businesses.

Have you ever seen individuals who live for the purpose of self-development and developing others? Have you ever seen workaholics who are fans of the work they do and whose eyes spark with love when talking about what they do? Those are the Armenians established in Lebanon who have done their best to preserve the Armenian dignity becoming the leading professionals in their fields.

We visited three Armenian factories in Lebanon. The first one was Saltek, Automatic Pita Bread and Flat Bread Lines company. Saltek is one of the few companies in Lebanon whose name alone indicates the seriousness of the brand. Their products are sold both in Lebanon and abroad (mostly to Europe).

The next company we visited was Bed&Bed, which perfectly presents the art of organizing sleep and leisure by producing a wide range of mattresses. I can assure you that I have never seen more high-quality and soft mattresses, pillows and sofas anywhere else. Observing the production process, one understands and appreciates the scope and intensity of the work done to ensure people’s peaceful sleep.

The last organization that we visited was Sidul (Bakalian Flour Mills). It is one of those Armenian companies that has transitioned to its third generation ownership. Today, the Bakalian sisters do everything they can to further develop their family business. They produce the best-quality flour. Despite the unfavorable conditions prevalent in the state, they manage to maintain a favorable position in the market. It is also worth mentioning that the production process is extremely interesting and fully automated.

Concluding my remarks, I’d like to mention a few facts about Armenian businesses and Lebanon:

  1. People really love their work and pass that love from one generation to the next.
  2. The Armenian youths swiftly embark in their family businesses growing them in line with the demand of the 21st century.
  3. Business likes its customers as well as its employees. (Using the principle that the more an employee develops, the more we develop).
  4. The Armenian businesses are mostly aimed at wholesale trade where there is more money in circulation.
    That is why the Armenian business has a huge role both in the local economy and politics.
  5. Lebanon is similar to Armenia even more than we can imagine, but people there try hard to develop their economy despite the political and economic situation in the country.

Armenians are scattered all over the world. They have been actively involved in the architectural, cultural and, of course, economic development of their respective countries.

Armenians settled in Lebanon a long time ago and did not spare any effort to build and flourish that country.

And I unwittingly understand why the Armenian poet Gevorg Emin said:

“Who told you to squeeze us with such force
That … turned us into diamonds?
Who forced you to scatter us like stars,
So that you always see us wherever you go…?” (Translated by Tatul Sonentz)

Contributed by Anahit Mkrtchyan, EPIC Resident, Fall 2018 Cohort  

Turkish Press: Turkish court orders re-arrest of Dink murder suspects

Anadolu Agency (AA), Turkey
Friday
Turkish court orders re-arrest of Dink murder suspects
 
by Muhammed Enes Can and Mustafa Hatipoglu |
 
Prosecutors balked at conditional release of 2 suspects in 2007 murder of Armenian-Turkish journalist
 
ISTANBUL
 
An Istanbul court on Friday accepted prosecutors' appeal for the re-arrest of two suspects in the 2007 murder of Hrant Dink, a prominent Armenian-Turkish journalist.
 
Following the suspects' conditional release on Thursday, prosecutors asked the court to have them re-arrested, and the 15th High Criminal Court in Istanbul agreed.
 
Ercan Gun and Muharrem Demirkale had been released with a ban on leaving the country, while the court ordered the continued detention of Ramazan Akyurek and Ali Fuat Yilmazer.
 
Other suspects in the case include U.S.-based Fetullah Terrorist Organization (FETO) leader Fetullah Gulen, FETO-linked former prosecutor Zekeriya Oz, former Zaman daily Editor-in-Chief Ekrem Dumanli, and journalists Adem Yavuz Arslan and Faruk Mercan.
 
They are all charged with premeditated murder and attempting to overthrow the constitutional order.
 
Dink, the editor-in-chief of Armenian-Turkish newspaper Agos, was killed outside his office on Jan. 19, 2007.
 
In 2011, Ogun Samast was sentenced to 23 years in prison for the killing. Samast, who was 17 years old in early 2007, claimed he killed Dink for "insulting Turkishness."
 
Although Samast is the only person to be jailed for the murder, speculation on the involvement of others has persisted.
 
Last year, FETO — which plotted the defeated coup of July 15, 2016 in Turkey, leaving 251 people martyred — was officially tied to the case.
 
A 120-page indictment said soldiers and police involved in the Dink murder later played an active role in the defeated coup.
 
*Writing by Dilara Hamit and Busra Nur Bilgic

Asbarez: Reportedly Armenia Made ‘Political’ Deal for More Iranian Gas Imports

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan meets with President Hassan Rouhani of Iran on Feb. 27, 2019

YEREVAN (Azatutyun.am)—Armenia has reached a “political” agreement with neighboring Iran on importing larger amounts of Iranian natural gas, outgoing Energy Minister Garegin Baghramyan said on Thursday.

Baghramyan also told RFE/RL’s Armenian service that Armenian and Georgian officials are already negotiating on possible Iranian gas supplies to Georgia that would be carried out via Armenia.

The gas issue featured large during Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s official visit to Tehran last week. Speaking after talks with Pashinyan, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said his hydrocarbon-rich country is ready to sell more gas to Armenia and also use Armenian territory for gas exports to Georgia.

Pashinyan said that Yerevan is willing to boost imports of Iranian gas. He admitted, though, that the two sides have yet to agree on its price.

Armenia currently receives up to 500 million cubic meters of Iranian gas each year under a swap scheme that also involves exports of Armenian electricity to the Islamic Republic. Its overall gas imports total roughly 2 billion cubic meters per annum and they mostly come from Russia. According to the current and former Armenian governments, Russian gas is cheaper for the South Caucasus state than Iranian.

In Baghramyan’s words, Rouhani and Pashinyan instructed relevant Iranian and Armenian bodies to look into ways of implementing their “political understandings” on the gas issue, and a commercial deal could take different forms.

“There could be an increase in [Iranian gas] volumes for the purpose of a transit to Georgia,” explained the minister. “If there is a mutually beneficial price offer, there could be an increase in gas volumes in the form of direct sales [to Armenia.]”

“Not only we are negotiating [with Georgia] but also Iranian companies have reached certain understandings with Georgian companies,” Baghramyan, adding that Armenia is ready to serve as a transit route for Iranian gas supplies to Georgia.

Baghramyan further insisted that Russia’s Gazprom gas giant cannot block or impede greater Iranian gas supplies to Armenia.

Gazprom not only meets the bulk of Armenia’s gas needs but also owns the country’s gas distribution network. The latter in turn controls the Armenian section of a pipeline delivering Iranian gas. The pipeline can pump at least 2 billion cubic meters of gas annually.

Cognac, saké: Armenia sees Japan as an ally

Asia Times, Hong Kong
March 6 2019
 
 
Cognac, saké: Armenia sees Japan as an ally
 
For the Caucasus nation, engaging Japan presents an attractive complement to China’s Belt and Road
 
By Richard Giragosian, Yerevan
 
There is a fresh impetus in Yerevan to deepen and develop relations with Tokyo, seen as a key Asian trade market, a partner in forging a knowledge-based economy and a logical hedge to Belt and Road engagement.
 
Armenia has long held a special affinity for Japan. Stemming from the centuries-old presence of Armenian businessmen throughout Asia, including a small but significant commercial elite in Singapore, Thailand and India, Japan was a key outpost for early Armenian diplomacy.
 
As early as 1920, Armenia was represented by Diana Apcar, an ethnic Armenian, but Rangoon-born – now Yangon – intellectual who, as Armenia’s Honorary Consul in Japan, was possibly the first female diplomat in history.
 
Japan’s pivotal position as the center of Armenian diplomacy in Asia continues. Armenian Ambassador Grant Pogosyan stands out by virtue of a rare combination of being both a professional diplomat and a local professor, with more than two decades of experience teaching at a university in Tokyo.
 
As a fluent Japanese speaker, Ambassador Poghosyan has contributed to the substantial deepening and development of bilateral Armenian-Japanese relations, including an expanded breadth that encompasses humanitarian and cultural ties beyond the traditional areas of political and economic cooperation.  
 
Although Japan was one of the first countries to recognize the newly independent Republic of Armenia in September 1992, the Armenian embassy in Tokyo was not established until 2010, while Japan opened its embassy in Yerevan in 2015.
 
Diplomatic, economic and commercial ties have nevertheless consistently expanded, with two Armenian presidential and two foreign ministerial visits to Japan from 1999-2012, as well as several separate visits by the Armenian premier, various ministers and parliamentarians.
 
Bilateral trade is promising, but relatively meager to date, with Armenia exporting to Japan only about 1.17 billion yen (US$9.8 million) and importing roughly in 2.17 billion yen worth of goods and products in 2017. Japan’s role as a donor to Armenia is far more significant, however, with official development aid extended through 2016 totaling approximately 39 billion yen in loans and grants, with an additional 4.5 billion yen in financing for technical cooperation.
 
In recent years, official Japanese trips to Armenia included four visits by the parliamentary vice-ministers for foreign affairs, and one visit by the state minister for foreign affairs, as well as a high-profile visit by current Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Kono in September 2018.
 
Endowed with a refreshing degree of strategic vision on the Armenian side, there is a more focused approach to forging a strategic relationship with Japan. This improvement stems from two main factors.
 
New markets, IT
 
The first, most fundamental driver of Armenia’s renewed engagement of Japan is rooted in a revised strategic vision that elevates attention to the importance of Asia as a source of new markets and investors for Armenia.
 
This belated recognition of the importance of Asia as a strategic target is bolstered by a steady influx of Asian tourists to Armenia.
 
For Armenia, which is seeking to correct its over-dependence on Russia, the deepening ties with Tokyo are also based on an understanding that Moscow will be much more permissive of such diplomacy in Asia than any deeper embrace of the West.
 
A second factor shaping Armenia’s pursuit of Japan stems from the Armenian government’s recently articulated goal of forging a more innovative knowledge-based economy, leveraging the synergy of its surging IT sector with the desire for Japanese technical expertise, applications and hardware.
 
A key component in this area is the necessity for Armenia to tailor Japanese technical and technological training programs to address what has become a shortfall in Armenian education and a shortage of a new generation of skilled IT workers and specialists.
 
The signing of a new Japan-Armenia Investment Agreement in 2018 has also granted new impetus to the expansion of bilateral relations. The agreement offered most-favored-nation status, and it is also expected to encourage Japanese investment in Armenia’s growing information technology sector. It is this agreement, and its inherent focus on IT, that reveals the deeper strategy underlying Armenia’s view of Japan.  
 
Balancing the Belt
 
But it is geopolitics and Armenia’s quest for greater strategic balance that makes Japan so attractive. More specifically, with a sustained policy of developing relations with China, Armenia sees a need for balance and parity by also deepening relations with Japan.
 
And looking beyond geopolitical balancing between Beijing and Tokyo, the imperative for Yerevan in this context is “strategic diversification,” mandated by the spring 2018 Velvet Revolution that swept Armenia’s new government to power.
 
For Armenia, this localized focus on strategic diversification reflects the divergence of Armenia’s relationship with China and Japan.
 
With China, Armenia relies on the need for alternative military and security ties, beyond simply an over-dependence on Russia, as well as the potential of indirect dividends or economic spillover from China’s Belt and Road Initiative.
 
The latter promise of Chinese capital investment in regional infrastructure is also an important longer-term goal for Armenia.
 
Armenia’s view of the grand Belt Road Initiative project also sees China as a gateway for greater “inter-connectivity” and essential consideration of remote, isolated and landlocked Armenia. But at the same time, Japan is also valued as a source for a different, and more advanced form of such inter-connectivity, offering Armenia a path to greater technological integration and access, a much more pressing factor than basic Chinese capital investment in roads and rail.
 
The Armenian strategy is based on a view of Japan as a pivotal player with the capacity to counterbalance China and to go beyond any over-reliance on still-distant Belt and Road projects.
 
Armenia’s neighbors in the South Caucasus have taken a more China-focused approach, with Georgia relying more heavily on Beijing as a partner for the financing of its infrastructure and Azerbaijan also looking to the Chinese for cooperation in its energy sector. Neither country seeks to engage Japan as an offset to balance against expectations from China’s Belt and Road vision.
 
Against this backdrop of a more refined and better defined strategic vision, Armenia is now moving quickly to forge an enhanced and empowered policy of engaging Japan.
 
Bolstered by the country’s already deepening relationship with China, this balanced “pivot” to Asia offers Armenia an important new opportunity, an imperative given the lack of credible Belt and Road opportunities to date.
 
Richard Giragosian is the director of the Regional Studies Center, an independent think tank in Yerevan, Armenia.

Վազգեն Մանուկյանն ասել է Փաշինյանին, թե ինչ է մտածում Մարտի 1-ի մասին

  • 01.03.2019
  •  

  • Հայաստան
  •  

3
 141

Վարչապետ Նիկոլ Փաշինյանն ընդունել է Հանրային խորհրդի անդամներին՝ խորհրդի նախագահ Վազգեն Մանուկյանի գլխավորությամբ: Այս մասին հայտնում են կռավարության մամուլի ծառայությունից։


Ողջունելով ՀԽ անդամներին՝ վարչապետ Փաշինյանը նախ անդրադարձել է 2008 թվականի մարտիմեկյան իրադարձությունների կապակցությամբ այսօր հղած իր ուղերձին:


«Ուրախ եմ ձեզ տեսնելու և Հանրային խորհրդի գործունեության հետ կապված հարցեր քննարկելու համար: Քիչ առաջ 2008 թվականի մարտի 1-ի իրադարձությունների կապակցությամբ հանդես եմ եկել ուղերձով և այնտեղ որպես վարչապետ պետության անունից ներողություն եմ խնդրել Երրորդ Հանրապետության պատմության ընթացքում տեղի ունեցած բոլոր ընտրակեղծիքների, բոլոր քաղաքական հետապնդումների համար:


Այդ ուղերձը, ներողության խոսքերն ուղղված են Երրորդ Հանրապետության ընթացքում քաղաքական հետապնդման ենթարկված բոլոր քաղաքական ուժերին, քաղաքական գործիչներին և քաղաքացիներին: Ուզում եմ ընդգծել, որ այդ ուղերձն ուղղված է նաև Ձեզ՝ պարոն Մանուկյան, որպես Հայաստանի Հանրապետությունում երկար տարիներ ընդդիմադիր քաղաքական ուժ ղեկավարած և ընտրակեղծիքների զոհ դարձած քաղաքական ուժի ղեկավար, քաղաքական գործիչ:


Տիկին Բախշյան՝ Դուք նույնպես երկար տարիներ Հայաստանում ընդդիմադիր քաղաքական գործունեություն եք ծավալել և Ձեր քաղաքական ուժը նույնպես ընտակեղծիքների, հետապնդումների, քաղաքական բռնության զոհ է դարձել: Պարոն Սաֆարյան Դուք նույնպես ընդդիմադիր քաղաքական գործունեություն եք ծավալել:


Ես շատ կարևոր եմ համարում այս ուղերձը և դիրքորոշումը պետական մակարդակով արձանագրելը, որովհետև պետք է մենք ուժ ունենանք և ասենք, որ Հայաստանում խնդիրները եթե ոչ 100 տոկոսով, գոնե 90 և ավելի տոկոսով ծագել են այն կետից, երբ Հայաստանի ժողովրդի քաղաքական կամքն աղավաղվել է:


Ցավոք, Երրորդ Հանրապետության պատմության մեջ բացի թերևս առաջին նախագահական ընտրություններից և կարելի է վերապահում անել 1999-ի խորհրդարանական ընտրությունների վերաբերյալ, չնայած դրանք արդյունքները նույնպես բողոքարկվել են Սահմանադրական դատարանում, մնացած դեպքերում առնվազն իմ քաղաքական գնահատականն այնպիսին է, որ ընտրությունների արդյունքները կամ կեղծվել են, կամ ժողովրդի ազատ կամարտահայտման համար հնարավորություններ չեն ստեղծվել, կամ ավելի ճիշտ ամեն ինչ արվել է ժողովրդի ազատ կամարտահայտումն աղավաղելու համար:


Ուզում եմ արձանագրել և հույս ունեմ՝ մենք ունենք հանրային համաձայնություն, ըստ որի՝ ընտրակեղծիքների, քաղաքական հետապնդումների, կոռուպցիայի, ապօրինությունների, ամենաթողության, լկտիության, մարդու իրավունքների ոտնահարման էջը փակված է, և վերադարձ այդ բարքերին այլևս չի լինելու: Համենայն դեպս, ես սա համարում եմ մեր կառավարության և իմ՝ որպես Հայաստանի Հանրապետության վարչապետ ամենակարևոր առաքելությունը:


Վստահ եմ, որ մենք շատ վճռական և հաստատակամ կմնանաք այդ առաքելության ծառայության շրջանակներում, անկախ նրանից, թե որևէ ընտրության ժամանակ մեր ուժն ինչքան վարկանիշ կունենա և քաղաքացիների քանի տոկոսը մեր քաղաքական ուժի օգտին կքվեարկի:


Սա որպես նախաբան, գիտեմ, որ մեր հանդիպումն այս խնդիրների հետ կապված չէ, բայց ենթադրում եմ բազմաթիվ հարակից հարցերի վերաբերյալ պետք է մենք այսօր քննարկում ունենանք: Շնորհակալ եմ»:


Իր հերթին, Վազգեն Մանուկյանը նշել է. «Շնորհակալ եմ պարոն վարչապետ: Իսկապես պետք է խոսենք Հանրային խորհրդի մասին, բայց ես ևս ցանկանում եմ անդրադառնալ Ձեր ասածին: Ցանկալի կլիներ, որ մարտի մեկը դառնա խորհրդանիշ, ոչ թե իրար դեմ պայքարելու, այլ համերաշխության օր: Ինչ եղել` եղել է, ինչ-որ մի էջ փակվեց դրանով, և սրանից հետո մարտի մեկը մենք պետք է հիշենք ոչ թե իրար դեմ պայքարելու, այլ որպես մի օր, որտեղ դաս ենք քաղել մեր պատմությունից և դարձրել ենք համերաշխության օր մեր ամբողջ ժողովրդի համար:


Ով որոշակի մեղք ունի, քրեական հանցագործություն ունի՝ թող պատժվի, դա չէ հարցը, բայց մարտի 1-ը ես ընկալում եմ որպես համերաշխության, միասնության և դաս քաղելու օր:


Անդրադառնալով Հանրային խորհդին՝ կարծում եմ, որ այն շատ կարևոր մարմին է, պատահական չէ, որ 70 երկրներում այսպիսի մարմին գոյություն ունի: Եվ հիմա նոր հնարավորություններ կան, քանի որ այն դարձել է սահմանադրական մարմին: ՀԽ-ում հավաքվել է հետաքրքիր կազմ շատ օգտակար մարդկանցով, որոնք ինչ-որ իմաստով վեր են կանգնած քաղաքականությունից ու նվիրված են պետությանը, չեն ներկայացնում որևէ քաղաքական կուսակցություն, չունեն քաղաքական ամբիցիաներ, այլ ունեն ամբիցիաներ՝ երկիրը շենացնելու, ստեղծելու, դառնալու հասարակության և իշխանության միջև անընդհատ կապ ապահովող մի կարևոր օղակ»:


Հանդիպման ընթացքում Վազգեն Մանուկյանը վարչապետին է ներկայացրել Հանրային խորհդրի ձևավորման ուղղությամբ իրականացված աշխատանքներն ու ՀԽ-ի հետագա գործունեության ուղղությամբ նախատեսվող քայլերը:

Armenia exported weapons to Bulgaria in 2017-2018

PanArmenian, Armenia
Feb 26 2019

PanARMENIAN.NetArmenia exported weapons worth $155,000 to Bulgaria in 2017-2017, information published by the State Revenue Committee reveals.

The armament shipped abroad fall under the category of automatic firearms, machine guns, sniper rifles, as well as large caliber weapons, such as artillery and anti-tank supplies.

65 units of unspecified weapons were delivered in 2017 and 240 units in 2018 and were worth $32,500 and $122,000, respectively.

Based on the price and quantity of the supplies sent to Bulgaria, firearms or light grenade launchers were exported, rather than large-caliber weapons.

As reported earlier, the Democratic Republic of Congo received Armenian ammo with a $1.468.000 customs value back in 2014.

Bulgaria, in turn, delivered 1094 units of light machine guns to Armenia in 2017, according to the UN Register of Conventional Arms.

Health ministry reveals list of clinics chosen to provide free surgical treatment for malignant diseases

ARKA, Armenia
Feb 21 2019

YEREVAN, February 21. /ARKA/. Armenia’s Ministry of Health has unveiled today the list of medical institutions chosen by the government to carry out the government-financed program of surgical treatment for malignant diseases. 

The ministry said relevant agreements with these clinics have already been signed. It added that citizens may apply to following medical institutions for free surgical treatment for malignant diseases: Vladimir Avakyan Medical Center, Nairi Medical Center, Shengavit Medical Center, Surb Grigor Lusavorich Medical Center, Surb Astvatsamayr Medical Center, ArtMed Rehabilitation Center, Astghik Medical Center, Fanarjian National Oncology Center, Gyumri Oncology Center, and Vanadzor Medical Center.

Earlier, Health Minister Arsen Torosyan said that surgical treatment for malignant diseases will be free for the entire population as it was removed from the list of co-financed medical services.

According to the ministry, some 5,600 people die in Armenia from malignant neoplasms annually. They account for 20.4% of all deaths coming second after deaths caused by circulatory system diseases. — 0–