Bush: Russia Committed To Vacate Georgian Bases

Radio Free Europe, Czech Republic
May 10 2005

Bush: Russia Committed To Vacate Georgian Bases

Tbilisi, 10 May 2005 (RFE/RL) — U.S. President George W. Bush,
speaking today in the Georgian capital, has said he has received
assurances from Russia that it will close its two remaining bases in
Georgia.

Bush said Russian President Vladimir Putin told him earlier this week
that Moscow is committed to reduce its military presence in the
Caucasus in conformity with an agreement reached nearly six years ago
at a summit of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in
Europe.

“He reminded me that there is an agreement in place, the 1999
[Istanbul] agreement. He said that the Russians want to work with the
[Georgian] government to fulfill their obligations in terms of that
agreement,” Bush said. “I think that’s a commitment, that’s an
important commitment for the people of Georgia to hear, and it shows
there is grounds to work to get this issue resolved.”

Russia maintains two former Soviet military bases in Georgia, one in
the autonomous republic of Adjara, and one in the predominantly
ethnic Armenian region of Samtskhe-Javakheti.

Georgia last month said Russia had agreed to close its bases by 1
January 2008. But Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov later said
Moscow would need at least four years to complete the withdrawal.

Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili has cited the base dispute to
justify his decision to boycott the Moscow ceremonies that marked the
60th anniversary of the end of World War II.

Saladin ? Un politique

Le Figaro, France
May 4 2005

Saladin ? Un politique

Professeur honoraire de l’université Paris-IV-Sorbonne, Jacques Heers
est un spécialiste des croisades. Biographe (Marco Polo, Louis XI,
Christophe Colomb, Gilles de Rais…), il s’est aussi imposé en
rectifiant quelques idées reçues, notamment avec Le Moyen Âge, une
imposture, vérités et légendes. Il vient de publier Chute et mort de
Constantinople dans la collection «Pour l’histoire» chez Perrin.
Propos recueillis par Eric Biétry-Rivierre
[04 mai 2005]

LE FIGARO. – Qui était Saladin ?

Jacques HEERS. – Certainement pas un pacifiste. Cet ancien officier
kurde est avant tout un politique. Il est devenu le sultan du grand
royaume de Syrie et d’Egypte en jouant de multiples rapports de
forces. S’il a pu ménager les croisés, c’est quand il lui fallait
établir un statu quo utile d’abord pour lui. Songez aux déboires de
Richard Coeur de Lion en Angleterre : il ne fallait pas à cette
époque rester trop longtemps hors de ses terres, et au Caire cela se
passait très mal en son absence.

Au sein des croisés y avait-il des colombes et des faucons ?

Il y avait surtout les avertis et les inconscients. Les premiers
étaient souvent nés sur place, leur mode de vie s’était orientalisé
et ils entretenaient depuis longtemps des relations de voisinage.
Même si l’on ne connaît pas de cas de conversion ni d’un côté ni de
l’autre, il y a eu des mariages mixtes. Souvent avec des Arméniennes
chrétiennes, il est vrai. Les inconscients étaient les nouveaux
arrivants qui, ne connaissant pas le terrain, voulaient tout de suite
en découdre. Ou bien des durs à cuire comme Renaud de Châtillon. Lui
a passé quinze années dans les prisons d’Alep et ne songe qu’à
récupérer sa principauté d’Alep. Pour cela, il mènera une équipée
jusqu’aux portes de La Mecque.

En 1187 (Scott a quelque peu condensé l’histoire), Jérusalem tombe…

La bataille décisive avait eu lieu avant, à Hittin. Jérusalem n’était
alors qu’un bled de 20 à 30 000 âmes. Guère de commerce, pas
d’industrie, contrairement à Bagdad, Damas, au Caire ou à
Constantinople, bien sûr. La ville était à cause de cela peu
défendue. Ce ne fut pas un bain de sang, plutôt un vaste marchandage.
On négocia sans trop de mal la rançon des otages. Le plus important
est que les pèlerinages furent gênés. Après 1187 à Jérusalem
l’hostilité cessera dès qu’ils seront à nouveau possibles. Notez
qu’il faut à ma connaissance attendre le XVIe siècle pour trouver le
mot «croisade» dans les textes qui évoquent cette période.
Jusqu’alors on disait «pèlerinage».

Quelle était la principale faiblesse des croisés ?

Leur essoufflement démographique. Depuis la première grande
expédition franque, à peu près un siècle plus tôt, il y avait eu
beaucoup de morts dans des guerres qui furent plutôt une multitude de
petits combats ou d’échauffourées plutôt que de grandes batailles
rangées. On le constate dans les chroniques où il est souvent
question de veuves qui cherchent à se remarier. L’épouse de Renaud de
Châtillon avait, par exemple, été déjà mariée deux fois. On sait
également que si l’on parle de milliers de croisés, environ un
dixième était combattant. Les pauvres souffraient beaucoup. Quant aux
cavaliers, ils luttaient sans limite d’âge dès 17 ans. Et les plus
jeunes souvent côte à côte avec leur père quand il avait survécu.
Chose impensable aujourd’hui.

–Boundary_(ID_V760aC67+UPojD26x0PezA)–

Ethnic Armenian MP Beat in Georgia

ETHNIC ARMENIAN MP BEAT IN GEORGIA

Pan Armenian News
07.05.2005 03:45

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ May 1 servicemen of the special military detachment
of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia beat Georgian MP
Hayk Meltonian and over 30 residents of Ghushchi Armenian village,
reported A-Info. The special detachment servicemen arrived in the
village and started a quarrel with a young resident of the village and,
feeling insulted with the response, hit him. This entailed beating
the Armenians that have gathered at the scene. At the time Georgian MP
Hayk Meltonian was in the village to congratulate the veterans of the
Great Patriotic War. Getting to know about the incident, he arrived
there. Introducing himself as a Parliament Deputy, Meltonian asked the
servicemen to stop the fight, however he found himself “in the heat
of the moment.” The police of Tsalka region instituted no proceedings
over the case, however apologies the servicemen apologized to the MP,
as well as to Ghushchi residents.

BAKU: Pressure group keen on holding rally

Pressure group keen on holding rally

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
May 5 2005

Baku, May 4, AssA-Irada — The Garabagh Liberation Organization (GLO)
insists on holding a rally-march in Baku on May 8, the anniversary of
Shusha occupation by Armenia. The GLO members will start the rally at
noon after paying tribute to the Cemetery of Martyrs, its chairman
Akif Naghi said. The Mayor’s Office of Baku has not responded to
the relevant appeal sent by GLO yet.*

ANKARA: And =?UNKNOWN?Q?G=FCl?= briefs Parliament

And Gül briefs Parliament

Thursday, May 5, 2005
OPINIONS

TDN editorial by Yusuf KANLI

Yusuf KANLI-It’s a constant complaint of Parliament: The government
does not adequately or sufficiently inform parliamentarians
onforeign policy issues. Irrespective of whether the country has a
fractured Parliament, a multi-party coalition government or, as now,
a legislature dominated by two parties and a government enjoying
overwhelming parliamentary strength, this complaint survives every
condition and the test of time.

Foreign policy, of course, is a sensitive area, and governments
oftenprefer to holdtheir cards close to thechest and provide as little
information as possible to members of the ruling party and even lessto
the opposition.

Thus, when a foreign minister speaks at Parliament or at a gathering of
some key parliamentary commissions, it’s an important event. We should
concede the fact, anyhow, that the current Justice and Development
Party (AKP) government appears more willing than previous governments
to provide information to Parliament, though onlyafter the issues under
discussion are somewhat finalized either by the Foreign Ministry or
at the government level.

It would have been great, for example, if Parliament had beeninformed
of the Incirlik air base discussions with the United Statesbefore
the government opted to use a back-door method and provide
broaderbase-usage rights to the U.S.military, thus avoiding a
parliamentary debate over the issue.

Still, a briefing to Parliament by the foreign minister is an
important event,at least for the records of the state. What did
Foreign Minister Abdullah Gül say on Wednesday to a joint meeting of
some key parliamentary commissions?

1 – There is no letup in Turkey’s EU bid. Turkey is now concentrating
more on implementation of legislated reforms than on maintaining the
former rapid pacein undertaking new reforms.

2 – This does not mean Turkey has completed its reform program (that
is, the reforms the EU has been demanding). The Penal Code reform is
inprocess in Parliament, while the reform in the law on foundations —
which would make it easier for minority foundations to own property —
will soon be submitted by the Cabinet to Parliament.

3 – Turkey has taken every possible move regarding expansion of the
1963 Ankara Association Treaty to cover all new members of the EU
— including the Greek Cypriot state — and the ball is now in the
EU’s court. Turkey is waiting for the EU to complete the process and
approach Ankara to sign the extension protocol. This will definitely
be done before Oct. 3, the start of talks.

4 – The screening process will not take much time, and Ankara expects
the accession talks to proceed speedily once they start on Oct. 3.

5 – The U.S. has not been given blanket permission inthe new Incirlik
decree by the government. U.S. flights will be confined to logistic
suppliesshipped to Iraq and Afghanistan and Turkey will be adequately
informed of all traffic.

6 – All facilities provided to the U.S. at Incirlik are in conformance
with the spirit of the alliance and existing agreements as well as
international law.

7 – The rules and conditions of use of Incirlik by the U.S. will be
decided by Turkey.

And Gül says Turkey may soon take a new initiative on the
Armenian.. What? Wait until the next briefing to learn more, or follow
the press!

–Boundary_(ID_mYOSAFIA+k1svg9yFDYTNw)–

ANKARA: Switzerland vs. Turkish Academician: ‘No Freedom of Speech i

Switzerland vs. Turkish Academician: ‘No Freedom of Speech in Switzerland’
View: Dr. Nilgun GULCAN

Journal of Turkish Weekly
May 4 2005

Turkey and Armenia has serious historical disputes regarding the
1915 Relocation Laws, ethnic conflicts, border issues and Armenian
occupation in Azerbaijan. Turkish Prime Minister has called the
Armenian President to establish a joint commission to discuss the
historical disputes. Not only Turkish PM, but also many other Turkish
politicians and diplomats have called the Armenians for a more peaceful
methods to find solutions. However Armenian side has frequently
rejected the Turkish offers. Armenian Foreign Minister Oskanian
repeatedly said “no need to discuss anything. Because everything
is clear and need nothing to discuss”. The Armenian diaspora, the
Tashnaks in particular, is totally against any dialogue with the
Turks. They consider dialogue between Turks and Armenians would be
betraying to the ‘Armenian national case’.

Turkey has experiencing a hot debate on the Armenian historical
claims. Though their number is very little, there are pro-Armenian
academicians and authors in Turkey. In addition, 100,000 Turkish
Armenians have also joined the debates. Almost all pro-Armenian
books have been published by the Turkish publishers, and Turkish TV
and radio channels opened their programs to Armenian politicians and
experts. Turkish national parliament made many sessions to discuss
the Armenian allegations. Turkish official archives including the
Army Archives were opened to researchers and historians from all
nationalities with no limitations. Turkish Government allowed the
Armenian planes to flight Turkish cities and took all possible steps
to normalize relations with Armenia. However not only Armenia, but also
‘Europeans’ do not help enough to the Turkish efforts:

First French parliament took a decision which officially accepted
the Armenian historical claims as truth. According to the French
decision the 1915 Relocation Operations was genocide. The French
parliamentarians did not touch how many Turks were killed by the armed
Armenians and simply ignored the Turkish approach. According to Turkish
side 1915 relocation decision was taken after the Armenian riots
and when Armenians in the eastern province joined the Russian Army
against the Ottoman State. Turks argue that most of the Armenians
died due to epidemic and famine. Turkey does not deny that many
Armenians were killed by the Turks and Kurds, however Turkey says
the reason is not racism as experienced in Germany, France and many
more European states, but ethnic clashes. Both sides were armed,
and the reason in many clashes was not only ethnic hatred but also
economic gains. The Kurdish gangs in particular attacked the Armenian
villages and looted the Armenian houses. The Ottoman soldiers could not
protect many Armenian families. However nobody could accuse the Ottoman
Army. The country was under attack: The French and British attacked
the Gallipoli, the Russians were occupying the Eastern provinces and
the British again attacking from the south. Worst of all the Armenian
citizens were joining the Russians in the east. Thus the Istanbul
Government decided to relocate the Armenians from East to Southern
provinces which is far away from the war theatres. Armenians call this
decision as a “start of genocide campaign”. As a matter of fact that
they never used ‘genocide’ term until the 1965 demonstrations. They
simply arguing during the First World war that they were part of
the war and they deserved a separate state. Sevres Treaty granted
them a independent state, but the Lausanne Treaty they lost all the
gaining. The Armenian Delegation in the Lausanne Negotiations argued
that “the Armenians fought against the Turks. We are part of this war
and we should be included the negotiations”. In brief the Armenians
confessed that they fought against the Ottoman State. Their demand
was refused but the Armenian militants started a terrorism campaign
and killed most significant former Ottoman ministers. In 19165
the Armenian ultranationalists re-fabricated Armenian nationalism
on anti-Turkish ideas. They produced a ‘genocide legacy’. They
followed Jewish example. They thought the Armenians could gain more
territories, billion-dollars-compensations and of course an independent
state. The new Armenian campaign was established on ‘genocide legacy’
and the legacy became a reality in the next generations. The legacy
created its own industry. New Armenian diaspora institutions were
established for the legacy, and the legacy became the single most
important cementing the Armenians in diaspora. In the post-1965 the
diaspora did not want to find a solution, but the problem was itself
a solution for the diaspora. During the Armenian terrorism of 1970s
and 80s more than 40 Turkish diplomats and many more civilians were
killed by the Armenian terrorists. French Government saw the Armenian
terrorists as freedom-fighter and showed a great tolerance. Almost
no terrorists were captured by the French security forces. Similarly
Armenian terrorism found a secure home in Greece and in Russia. Turkish
Government protested all these countries for their clear support to
terrorism. When the Armenian terrorists targeted the French and other
Western institutions Armenian terrorism was ended immediately. The
Armenian lobbying campaigns in the national parliaments replaced
the terrorism. Armenian parliamentarians with their supporters tried
to prevent any co-operation with Turkish Government and any aid to
Turkey. The diaspora saw any harm they gave to Turkey was an Armenian
gain. The 2001 French Decision to recognize Armenian allegations as
truth was a result of this campaign.

Switzerland cantons and Canada followed the French. In the latest
step in this process, Switzerland authorities opened a legal
procedure against Turkish Institute of History (TTK) Chairman Prof.
Dr. Yusuf Halacoglu about his statement on Armenian allegations.
Prof. Halacoglu, like me, does not accept the Armenian claims.
According to Halacoglu not Turks but the Armenians committed massacres
and genocide-like attacks against civilian Turkish and other Muslim
population during the Ottoman period. The Swiss Government and
Parliement were criticizing Turkey for its attitude regarding the
freedom of speech. Swiss politicians in the past were arguing that all
could say anything they think. But now, they even cannot bear different
ideas. They even try to stop Turkish academicians to speak. Halacoglu
cannot understand the so-called European measures to silence him:

“They tried Galileo, but the world continued to turn… It is
not possible to understand how countries like France, Belgium, and
Switzerland could have moves to forbid the expression of rejection of
the Armenian genocide. What sort of democracy, what sort of freedom
of thought is this?” Halacoglu says.

The game is getting dirtier. Armenian diaspora manipulates the Western
public opinion and the racist and anti-Turks of the European countries
abuse the Armenian issue. However they do not know that they undermine
the European ideas and their own national interests. All know that
neither Armenians nor the ‘pro-Armenian anti-Turkish politicians’
are sincere. None of them seeks a real solution but continuity of
the problem. On the other hand Armenia and Turkey pay the bill.

Seeking acknowledgement, 90 years later

Armenian-Americans march at Capitol for recognition of genocide
By Parth Gejji

The Daily Texan, TX
May 3 2005

Seeking acknowledgement, 90 years later

Some came in buses. Some came in cars. Some ventured forth from San
Antonio, others from Houston and Dallas; both young and old alike.
They all gathered in the hall of the First United Methodist Church in
downtown Austin on a Saturday afternoon. They were there to be heard;
to commemorate the anniversary of a wound that still hasn’t healed,
left many dead and embittered the relations between two nations.

On April 23, nearly 400 Armenian-Americans marched to the Capitol to
commemorate 90 years since the deaths of many Armenians at the hands
of the Ottoman Empire. This event is sometimes called the Armenian
genocide. The protesters called for an official acknowledgment, by
both Turkey and the United States, that the events that took place
during the year of World War I should be labeled as a genocide.

“Our biggest impact is [that] we are able to raise the consciousness
of the people [about] what happened in the past,” said Father Vazken
Movsesian, a member of the Armenian Church Youth Ministries.

The protesters’ cause is not a new one. Yet, the march on April 23
marked another attempt by Armenian-Americans to change U.S. policy
regarding the acknowledgment of the death of Armenians in World War
I as a genocide. Generations of advocates have called for a Turkish
admission of the genocide, but the government continues to refute its
existence, which has caused years of uneasiness between the Armenian
and Turkish people.

The events of 1915-1922

Armenia, a country measuring slightly smaller than the state of
Maryland, neighbors Turkey. As a former state in the Soviet Union,
it had a troubled history during World War I when it was part of the
Ottoman Empire.

The Armenian National Institute, an organization based in Washington,
D.C., that is committed to advocating the acknowledgment of the
events as genocide, claims on its Web site that during World War I,
“The great bulk of the Armenian population was forcibly removed from
Armenia and Anatolia to Syria, where the vast majority was sent into
the desert to die of thirst and hunger. Large numbers of Armenians
were methodically massacred throughout the Ottoman Empire.”

The death toll estimate for the years of the claimed genocide is 1.2
million people, said Dr. Levon Chorbajian, professor of sociology at
the University of Massachusetts at Lowell and academic chair of the
Zoryan Institute, an organization that documents Armenian history.

Estimates aside, not everyone agrees that the Armenian deaths between
1915 and 1922 were part of a planned genocide on the part of the
Turkish government.

“We admit that the Armenians living in the Ottoman empire during
that period lost their lives,” said Emriye Ormanci, vice consul at
the Turkish Consulate in Houston. “[But] it was not a genocide.”

Narguiz Abbaszade, executive director of Assembly of Turkish American
Associations, an organization that advocates Turkish interests,
claims that for now there is simply not enough evidence to support
Armenian claims.

“This is a historical and legal debate that needs to be studied,”
she said.

Advocates of the Turkish community argue that Armenians died during
their relocation from one part of the Empire to another – not during
planned executions by the military.

“The Ottoman Empire was fighting with the Russians on the eastern
front, and also on the western front they were fighting with [the]
British and [the] French,” said Ormanci.

In 1915, Russia attempted to invade the Ottoman Empire from the east,
enlisting the help of Armenians to fight the Turks. As a result, the
Ottoman Empire decided to relocate the Armenian population to Syria,
said Ormanci. Armenians claim that this relocation was the first step
in a series of events that would become known as the Armenian genocide.

A lecture on disagreement

Ninety years later, on Friday, April 22, Dr. Chorbajian gave a lecture
entitled “The Importance of the Armenian Genocide: Then and Now,”
at the invitation of the Armenian Cultural Association, a UT student
organization.

As he prepared to talk about the Armenian people and their legacy,
a handful of listeners filtered into the Texas Union Theater.

“I just kind of saw it randomly, and I have a friend who is Armenian,”
said Thomas Hjelm, a religious studies senior. “There’s a lot of
things I don’t know about [the Armenian genocide].”

As the start of the lecture neared, a small group of Turkish students
gathered outside, handing out fliers that presented an opposing view
of the events during World War I.

“I wanted to express that the facts are different,” said Selim Erdogan,
one of the members of the executive committee of the Turkish University
Students Association, also a UT student organization. Erdogan wanted
to make sure that their voices would be heard, he said.

Professor Chorbanjian disagreed with the Turkish University Students
Association’s version of the events.

“[The] Armenian genocide is a documented historical fact,” he said.
Missionaries and diplomats from America and England who traveled to
the Ottoman Empire, documented the existence of the Armenian genocide,
said Chorbajian.

“It was much more directed and willful,” he said. “The plan of the
marches from the beginning was the intent of killing.”

Marching for awareness

One day later, protesters lined up in silence as a motorcade of
gleaming police bikes rode ahead of them. Little children carried
banners in their hands and walked cautiously in front of the adults.
Everyone walked silently as the march began. Slowly people started
singing a song in Armenian. Then came the chants: “1915 … Never
Again” and “We need justice now, we need justice now!”

Although they are not Armenian, Daniel and Allison Haynes, a couple
from Waco, participated in the march. After their Armenian friends
told them about the events of World War I the Haynes took up the
Armenian cause as well.

“I never heard of it growing up or in history books,” said Daniel,
referring to the Armenian deaths. “I think awareness is the most
important thing.”

Ed Bodont, an elderly man from Austin, felt compelled to honor the
memory of his Armenian parents by marching.

“It’s a recognition that there are a lot of people that have suffered
atrocities,” he said.

When the crowd reached the Capitol, the protesters quieted down as
they moved to the steps of the entrance. Ken Maranian, chairman of
the Texas Joint Committee for the 90th Anniversary of the Armenian
Genocide, started the event.

“I can’t tell you how moved I was to see you,” he said, addressing
the marchers. “We are hoping we can raise some awareness of genocide,”
said Maranian, in an interview. “It’s one of those things that needs
attention; 90 years later it’s [still] not recognized as genocide.”

Maranian was followed by a series of speakers, including Chorbajian
and Father Movsesian.

Advocates of the Armenian community’s cause claim that reconciliation
between the two countries will not be possible without a Turkish
effort to affirm the Armenian understanding of the events, Chorbajian
and Movsesian said.

“There does need to be an acknowledgment so Armenia and Turkey can
move forward,” said Chorbajian. “It’s a human rights issue.”

Until recently, there was little pressure on Turkey to issue such
an acknowledgment because of its influence on the United States,
which holds Turkey as a key military friend, Chorbajian said.

State of affairs

The Turkish government may soon adopt new a policy towards the
Armenian killings. Turkey, which is applying for membership to
the European Union, is feeling increased pressure from EU members
to formally acknowledge the deaths of the Armenians as genocide,
according to Maranian.

“Nine of the EU countries have recognized the genocide,” he said.

Particular attention is being paid by Greece, a prominent member of
the EU. Many Greeks in Turkey were expelled from the Ottoman Empire
around the time of the Armenian relocation, said Chorbajian.

“Thirty-eight states have properly commemorated the Armenian genocide,”
said Peter Abajian, deputy executive director of the Armenian Assembly
of America, a group that promotes public understanding and awareness
of Armenian issues.

Many lawmakers in Congress have also been lobbying to raise awareness
of Armenian interests.

In a letter to President George W. Bush, Rep. Frank Pallone Jr.,
D-N.J., and Rep. Joe Knollenberg, R-Mich., co-chairmen of the
Congressional Caucus on Armenian Issues, urged him to formally use the
term genocide when he refers to the events, writing: “The United States
must never allow crimes against humanity to pass without remembrance
and condemnation.”

Many U.S. lawmakers are slowly changing their views on the issue.
Last year, only 22 senators and 169 representatives signed similar
petitions. This year 32 senators and 179 representatives were in
support of such a resolution, said Abajian.

Other lawmakers suggest that the problem does not lie on the side
of the Turkish government. Rep. Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., and Rep. Robert
Wexler, D-Fla., issued a letter to Congress commending recent steps
taken by the Turkish government.

“We are deeply encouraged that Prime Minister Erdogan and his
government are taking a historic step by reaching out to Armenia,
calling for open, structured, introspective and result-oriented
dialogue on difficult issues involving Turks and Armenians.”

They were referring to the prime minster’s recent proposal to
Armenian President Robert Kocharian to allow each country to open up
its archives to the other, an act that would allows scholars from
both countries to research the accuracy of the claims of genocide,
said Ormanci.

Hatred felt

“We really want to have good relations with the Armenian people,
because we have a common history,” said Ormanci. “[But] there are
certain issues that have to be solved.”

Progress doesn’t seem possible until there is some reconciliation of
the issue of the Armenian genocide.

As the meeting on the Capitol neared its end, Selim Erdogan felt
disappointed by the hate he felt from the protesters in the crowd,
who compared his efforts to those of Holocaust deniers.

“It’s not just that you hated us. It’s not just that you killed us.
Apparently, you still hate us,” said Maranian, referring to Turkey
insistence that no genocide occurred during the Ottoman Empire.

http://www.dailytexanonline.com/news/2005/05/03/Focus/Seeking.Acknowledgement.90.Years.Later-946732.shtml

BAKU: Azeri soldier killed by Armenian fire – TV

Azeri soldier killed by Armenian fire – TV

ANS TV, Baku
2 May 05

[Presenter] The positions of the Azerbaijani national army came
under intensive fire from the Armenian armed forces today too. The
correspondent of ANS’s Karabakh bureau, Sahin Rzayev, has the details.

[Correspondent by phone] Salam Aytan. Taleh Nuriyev who served in a
military unit in the village of Cayli of Tartar District heroically
died while he was on duty. The body of the 19-year-old martyr was
handed over to his family and he was buried in Salyan [District] today.

[Passage omitted: details of truce violation by Armenians]

Metsamor neulear power station to close in 2016

A1 plus

| 16:03:07 | 29-04-2005 | Social |

METSAMOR NUCLEAR POWER STATION TO CLOSE IN 2016

With the positive conclusion of the NA Standing Committee on Defense,
National Security and Internal Affairs the draft law about the
building of a store for the nuclear fuel processes in the `Armenian
Nuclear Power Station’ LTD will be included in the agenda of the NA
Spring session. The draft law was represented by Minister of Energy
Armen Movsisyan.

The draft law offers to allow building a storehouse for the processes
nuclear fuel for up to 50 years of keeping date. As the Minister
mentioned, the volume of ht storehouse is calculated according to the
condition that the Armenian Nuclear Power Station will be exploited
till the end of 2016.

Yosi Sarid’s thoughts after International Conference on The Genocide

AZG Armenian Daily #078, 30/04/2005

Armenian Genocide

YOSI SARID’S THOUGHTS AFTER INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

Yosi Sarid’s article “Return from Armenia” was published on April 27 in
Haaretz newspaper. Yosi Sarid is the member of Israel’s Kneset. He wrote the
article after the participation in “Ultimate Crime, Ultimate Challenge.
Human Rights and Genocide” conference held in Yerevan on April 20-21. Yehuda
Bauer, Israel Charni, Yair Oran were also invited to the conference.

“Israel’s pretense is extremely important for the Armenians. They even made
some changes in the schedule, giving us an opportunity to return home on the
eve of Pesakh. The Jewish-Israeli position in the issue of the Armenian
Genocide deeply concerns and at the same time encourages the Armenians. They
are concerned as the official Israel still avoids to recognize their
ultimate crime. They are encouraged, as the world’s Jewish community and we
rebelled against the statement of Simon Peres who denied the Armenian
Genocide,” Sarid wrote.

Sarid called all the disputes over the fact of the genocide stupid and
disgusting. He says that it’s out of the question that one could kill 1,5
million of people in two years without planning the massacres beforehand.
“The Turks can bring thousands of excuses and explain what had happened, but
that is not the point. The point is that people, women, children, men died a
cruel and unnatural death,” he said.

Sarid also touched upon the prevention of the genocide, meaning that the
phenomenon of the genocide still exists. He emphasized the importance of the
responsibility. “Today’s Turks are not guilty for that, so I can’t
understand why they still deny the genocide instead of bearing the moral and
the historical responsibility. They damage their authority, especially, when
they are knocking at the EU’s doors. They should be admitted, but only after
bearing the responsibility,” Sarid wrote.

By Ruzan Poghosian