Breaking Ground & Blessing Performed on New Armenian Prelacy of CA

PRESS RELEASE
Contact: Dania Ohanian
Armenian Prelacy of Canada
3401 Olivar Asselin
Montreal, QC, H4J 1L5
Tel: (514) 856-1200
Fax: (514) 856-1805
Email: [email protected]

Breaking Ground and Blessing Ceremony
performed on New Armenian Prelacy of Canada Site

A rainy day marked the ground breaking and blessing ceremony for the new
Prelacy building, conducted under the auspices of His Eminence Archbishop
Khajag Hagopian, Prelate, on Sunday October 17, 2004.

The main donors, Mr. Hagop Pastermadjian ($150 000) and Mrs. Betty Minassian
Heller ($100 000), as well as the former and current presidents of the
Prelacy’s Executive Council, Mr. Yetvart Froundjian, Vartkes Chamlian, Esq.,
Dr. Girair Basmadjian, Mr. Krikor Kouyoumdjian (current president) placed
the founding rocks on the future site of the building.

Mrs. Heller, Herman Kalaydjian (standing in for Mr. Pastermadjian) and the
presidents also buried a time capsule which included, among other things,
soil from Armenia, issues of Horizon Weekly, pictures of the community, a
cross and a bible.

The ceremony was continued inside the community centre, in the Aharonian
Hall, where the spiritual art exhibit, featuring the works of Vatche
Arakelian and Vartan Jiftjian was coming to a close.

The construction of the Prelacy is a momentous and pivotal event for the
Canadian Armenian community, whose identity and culture is entrenched in the
Armenian Church.

Its importance was further symbolized by Manoug Khatchadourian, a
102-year-old Genocide survivor, who donated $5000 in memory of his wife
towards the construction of the Prelacy.

His Eminency, Archbishop Khajag Hagopian, Prelate, concluded the ceremony by
blessing the columns and foundation of the Prelacy, scheduled to be
completed in January 2005.

-30-

www.armenianprelacy.ca

Russian blockade of S.Caucasus leaves Armenians fuming

Eurasianet, NY
Oct 19 2004

RUSSIAN BLOCKADE OF SOUTH CAUCASUS LEAVES ARMENIANS FUMING
Emil Danielyan 10/18/04

Russia’s decision to close border-crossing points with Georgia and
Azerbaijan, purportedly to frustrate movements by Chechen militants,
has produced widespread discontent, even anger in Armenia – Moscow’s
long-time strategic ally in the Caucasus. Some in Yerevan suggest the
move may prompt a reassessment of Armenia’s special relationship with
Russia.

Armenia – a landlocked country already squeezed by embargos enforced
by neighboring Turkey and Azerbaijan – had depended heavily on a
trade route via Georgia to Russia, known as the Upper Lars Pass. The
Kremlin’s decision in September to close its border with Georgia has
added to Armenia’s isolation, severing one of its two overland export
routes to Russia. Armenian businesses dependent on trade with Russia
and other parts of the former Soviet Union are facing ruin.

Armenian leaders have pressed Russian President Vladimir Putin to
reconsider the border closure. Yerevan rejected a Russian proposal to
transport goods via South Ossetia, saying the route was impractical
due to the high level of tension in the region. [For background see
the Eurasia Insight archive]. Russian Transport Minister Igor Levitin
indicated during talks with Armenian official on October 14 that the
Upper Lars Pass would remain closed for at least another month so
that Moscow can implement “anti-terrorist measures.” Levitin also
claimed that a trade route via Iran and the Caspian Sea was a cheaper
alternative for Armenia than sending goods to Russia via the Upper
Lars Pass.

The maximum Moscow could do, Levitin said, is to again reopen the
Upper Lars Pass for a few hours. This is what happened on October 10
when nearly 600 Armenian trucks, personal cars and buses stranded on
the mountain pass for a month were allowed to cross into Georgia and
proceed to Armenia.

Russian authorities ordered the closure of Georgian-Russian
checkpoint, including Upper Lars, immediately after the September 3
hostage tragedy in Beslan, North Ossetia. [For background see the
Eurasia Insight archive]. Russian officials insist that the Chechen
separatists have used Georgia and Azerbaijan as safe heavens to carry
out terrorist acts. [For additional information see the Eurasia
Insight archive]. Officials in Baku and Tbilisi strongly dispute the
Kremlin’s claim.

Armenian authorities have yet to offer an estimate of the financial
damage done to the Armenian economy. Officials have made
contradictory assessments, with Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian
citing “serious consequences,” while Trade Minister Karen
Chshmaritian suggested that the direct damage was not substantial.

Whatever the true extent of the disruption, many in Armenia consider
Russia’s actions as unjustified. Vahan Hovannisian, a leader of the
Armenian Revolutionary Federation, a traditionally pro-Russian party
represented in Kocharian’s coalition cabinet, branded the border
closings as “hasty and not fully calculated.”

Opposition politicians have been even more outspoken in their
criticism of Moscow. “I am convinced that it [the border decision]
has nothing to do with terrorism,” said Vazgen Manukian, a former
prime minister. “This is simply political pressure on Georgia. That
Armenia is suffering from it doesn’t matter to Russia. It [Moscow]
will trample our national interests for the sake of its own
interests.”

Such resentment is echoed by the Armenia’s politically diverse print
media, which has been unanimous in condemning Moscow’s policy. Many
Armenian political experts are warning that the Russians’ actions
risk alienating their main regional ally, which, they some go on to
note, has strengthened its ties with the West in recent months. “The
Russian-Armenian strategic relationship is called into question,”
declared Azg, an independent daily normally supportive of Russia.

The Russian-language newspaper Golos Armenii complained that Putin’s
administration was “measuring all Caucasians with the same
yardstick.”

“There is a growing number of organizations in Armenia that are not
carriers of Armenians’ traditional pro-Russian orientation,” the
editorial continued. “And that is not only the result of the West’s
actions [to improve its relations with Armenia], but also Russian
steps leading nowhere.”

Some opinion polls appear to confirm that traditionally strong
Armenian-Russian ties are eroding. One survey last May — conducted
by the Armenian Center for National and International Studies
(ACNIS), an independent think-tank — found that almost two-thirds of
the 50 political and public-policy experts interviewed wanted Armenia
to join NATO within the next decade. In addition, most experts
identified Russia as the foreign power that “limits Armenia’s
independence.”

An ACNIS survey in August, however, found that opinions among the
broader Armenian population remain strongly pro-Russian. Almost 90
percent of 2,000 respondents described Russia as a friendly nation.
Only 47 percent had the same perception of the United States.

The pro-Russian sentiment is deeply rooted in the Armenians’ sense of
insecurity, generated largely by decades of hostility between Armenia
and Turkey, and fueled by the unresolved conflict with Azerbaijan
over Nagorno-Karabakh. [For additional information see the Eurasia
Insight archive]. A Karabakh settlement, though unlikely in the near
future, would presumably help ease Armenians’ siege mentality. The
pro-Western outlook of a growing number of intellectuals could also
reflect on public opinion over time.

Russian-Armenian relations have a strong socio-economic component.
Since the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union, hundreds of thousands of
Armenian citizens have moved to Russia in search of jobs. Their
regular cash remittances back to Armenia are a major source of income
for many families in the impoverished country.

At the same time, Russia’s share of Armenia’s external trade has
steadily declined over the past decade. Indeed, in 2004, the European
Union emerged as Armenia’s single largest trading partner. Official
figures for the first half of this year show the EU accounting for
over 40 percent of the country’s commercial exchange. Russia’s share
was less than 20 percent. A recent survey, conducted by the
independent Vox Populi polling organization, found that a majority of
Armenians would prefer to join the European Union, rather than remain
in the Russian-dominated Commonwealth of Independent States.

The closure of the Russian-Georgian border stands to accelerate the
decline in Russian-Armenian commercial ties. Some media commentaries
suggest that public attitudes in Armenia towards Russia may also
start shifting soon. As a commentator for the Azg daily stated in
early October; “If Russia really wants to stir up anti-Russian
sentiment among Armenia’s political circles and public in general, it
can continue this blockade.”

Tajik president hails outcome of talks with Putin

Tajik president hails outcome of talks with Putin

Avesta web site, Dushanbe
16 Oct 04

Dushanbe, 16 October: “I would like to thank [Vladimir] Putin
personally for his foresight and extraordinary approach to resolving
the complicated issues that were hampering our cooperation,” the
Tajik president [Emomali Rahmonov] has told a news conference after
Tajik-Russian top-level talks.

He said the [Putin’s] visit would give a fresh impetus to Tajik-Russian
relations.

“We attach great importance to setting up the Russian military base
in Tajikistan and restructuring Tajikistan’s state debt to Russia,”
the president said. “I think this was a great achievement. The
meeting is of historical significance to Tajikistan. The burden of
unsettled problems will no longer be bothering us and we may now work
on specific projects in a business-like atmosphere, for which we have
created a solid basis.”

Discussing economic cooperation, Tajik president called on Russian
business circles to be more active on the Tajik market. He added
that the sides discussed regional and international issues such as
fighting terrorism and drug trafficking, the situation in Afghanistan
and ways to raise the effectiveness of such organizations as the
CIS, the CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization; members are
Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Russia],
the SCO [Shanghai Cooperation Organization; members are China,
Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Russia], the EAEC
[the Eurasian Economic Community of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
Russia and Tajikistan – the former Customs Union] and others.

BAKU: Russia adds Armenia, Syria to North-South project

Russia adds Armenia, Syria to North-South project

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
Oct 15 2004

Armenia and Syria have joined the North-South transport corridor
project, Russian Minister of Transport Igor Levitin said in a meeting
with his Armenian counterpart in Yerevan. Russian Prime Minister
Mikhail Fradkov has already signed a relevant document, he said.
Levitin emphasized that this will allow to expand the geographic area
for cargo transportation.

However, the Russian official failed to elaborate on Armenia’s
joining the project, considering the fact this country occupies the
territories of Azerbaijan, through which the route lays, and has no
relations with the country.

The North-South transport corridor project envisions transportation
of cargo from South Asia to Europe through the Persian Gulf, Caspian
Sea ports, Russia’s water channels and railways.

The corridor will allow to alter the existing routes for transportation
of container consignments and reduce the time needed to for cargo
transit.*

ANCA: Armenian Caucus Asks President Bush to Protest Azeri Threats

Armenian National Committee of America
888 17th St., NW, Suite 904
Washington, DC 20006
Tel: (202) 775-1918
Fax: (202) 775-5648
E-mail: [email protected]
Internet:

PRESS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 12, 2004
Contact: Elizabeth S. Chouldjian
Tel: (202) 775-1918

ARMENIAN CAUCUS PROTESTS AZERBAIJANI THREATS AGAINST ARMENIA

— Seventy-two U.S. Representatives Call on President
Bush to Condemn Baku’s Increasingly Violent Rhetoric

WASHINGTON, DC – Seventy members of the U.S. House of
Representatives joined last week with the Co-Chairmen of the
Congressional Armenian Caucus, Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and Joe
Knollenberg (R-MI), in calling on President George Bush to press
Azerbaijan to back away from increasingly violent rhetoric aimed at
Armenia and Nagorno Karabagh, reported the Armenian National
Committee Of America (ANCA).

“We share the concerns raised by this bipartisan group of U.S.
legislators regarding the growing danger to Armenia – and to
American interests – posed by the increasingly angry threats coming
from Azerbaijan’s senior leadership,” said ANCA Executive Director
Aram Hamparian. “Armenian Americans appreciate the leadership of
Armenian Caucus Co-Chairmen Joe Knollenberg and Frank Pallone on
this issue, and look forward to learning of the Administrations
response to Azerbaijan’s irresponsible and dangerous behavior.”

In the letter, dated October 8th, Members of Congress specifically
asked President Bush to publicly condemn Azerbaijan’s war rhetoric
and other increasingly bellicose remarks against the Republic of
Armenia and Nagorno Karabagh. The letter, states, in part:
“Efforts to reinforce stability and reduce the risk of conflict are
in the best interests of the United States and the region. The
Nagorno Karabagh peace process will achieve nothing if Azerbaijan
is allowed to risk war and predict ethnic cleansing with impunity.
To this end, we urge that you condemn these remarks and call upon
the government of Azerbaijan to desist in making any further
threats against Armenia and Nagorno Karabagh.”

Joining Reps. Knollenberg and Pallone were: Gary Ackerman (D-NY),
Robert Andrews (D-NJ), Xavier Becerra (D-CA), Shelley Berkley (D-
NV), Howard Berman (D-CA), Michael Bilirakis (R-FL), Jeb Bradley
(R-NH), Michael Capuano (D-MA), Dennis Cardoza (D-CA), John Conyers
(D-MI), Jerry Costello (D-IL), Joseph Crowley (D-NY), Rosa DeLauro
(D-CT), Jim DeMint (R-SC), Vernon Ehlers (R-MI), Anna Eshoo (D-CA),
Tom Feeney (R-FL), Bob Filner (D-CA), Mark Foley (R-FL), Barney
Frank (D-MA), Scott Garrett (R-NJ), Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), Michael
Honda (D-CA), Steve Israel (D-NY), Jesse Jackson (D-IL), Sue Kelly
(R-NY), Patrick Kennedy (D-RI), Mark Kirk (R-IL), Gerald Kleczka
(D-WI), James Langevin (D-RI), Sander Levin (D-MI), Nita Lowey (D-
NY), Stephen Lynch (D-MA), Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Edward Markey
(D-MA), Karen McCarthy (D-MO), Betty McCollum (D-MN), Thaddeus
McCotter (R-MI), James McGovern (D-MA), Michael McNulty (D-NY),
Martin Meehan (D-MA), Candice Miller (R-MI), James Moran (D-VA),
Grace Napolitano (D-CA), Devin Nunes (R-CA), Collin Peterson (D-
MN), Jon Porter (R-NV), David Price (D-NC), George Radanovich (R-
CA), Mike Rogers (R-MI), Steven Rothman (D-NJ), Lucille Roybal-
Allard (D-CA), Bobby Rush (D-IL), Loretta Sanchez (D-CA), H. James
Saxton (R-NJ), Adam Schiff (D-CA), E. Clay Shaw (R-FL), Christopher
Shays (R-CT), Brad Sherman (D-CA), John Shimkus (R-IL), Mark Souder
(R-IN), John Sweeney (R-NY), Stephanie Tubbs-Jones (D-OH), Fred
Upton (R-MI), Christopher Van Hollen (D-MD), Peter Visclosky (D-
IN), Henry Waxman (D-CA), Anthony Weiner (D-NY), Joe Wilson (R-SC),
and Albert Wynn (D-MD).

The ANCA, in a September 28th note to Congressional offices in
support of this letter, wrote: “If history is any guide, silence on
our part will only embolden the leadership in Baku to escalate
their rhetoric even further. Left unchecked, we run the risk that
the Azerbaijani government will translate their angry remarks into
aggressive actions that will create a humanitarian disaster and
destablize a region of great strategic importance to the United
States.”

On September 28th, Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) spoke on the House
floor about the dangers posed by increasingly inflammatory
Azerbaijani statements by President Ilham Aliyev and his Cabinet
Members, calling for a military takeover of neighboring Armenia and
the decimation of its population in the coming decades. In his
remarks, Rep. Pallone cited statements “made by officials in the
government of President Aliyev calling into question the very
existence of Armenia. For example, as reported by Radio Free
Europe, the Azerbaijani Defense Ministry spokesman called for
Azerbaijan’s takeover of the entire territory of Armenia and
removal of the entire Armenian population from the Caucasus. He
went so far as to say, and I quote, ‘Within the next 25 years there
will exist no state of Armenia in the South Caucasus.’ Given
Azerbaijan’s history of aggression against Armenians, these remarks
can’t be dismissed as mere rhetoric.”

The text of the Congressional letter is provided below.

#####

Dear Mr. President,

We are writing to strongly urge you to condemn the ongoing
Azerbaijani war rhetoric and other increasingly bellicose remarks
made against the Republic of Armenia and Nagorno Karabagh. These
statements undermine U.S. interests in the region.

As you know, a cease-fire in the conflict over Nagorno Karabagh was
established in 1994 and sensitive peace negotiations to achieve a
final agreement are ongoing. However, the government of Azerbaijan
continues to make dangerous claims and threaten war against
Armenia. This war rhetoric has continued unabated and has
intensified in recent months.

In July, as reported by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, the
Azerbaijani Defense Ministry spokesman called for Azerbaijan’s
takeover of Armenia and removing its entire population. He said,
“In the next 25-30 years there will be no Armenian state in the
South Caucasus. This nation has been a nuisance for its neighbors
and has no right to live in this region. Present-day Armenia was
built on historical Azerbaijani lands. I believe that in 25 to 30
years these territories will once again come under Azerbaijan’s
jurisdiction.” Mr. President, this reprehensible call for ethnic
cleansing and even genocide warrants the strongest possible reply
from our country.

The President of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliyev, has repeatedly declared
that Azerbaijan could launch a new war in Karabagh. Just two
months ago, he stated, “At any moment we must be able to liberate
our territories by military means. To achieve this we have
everything.” Aliyev has directly linked Azerbaijan’s economic
progress to its military “superiority.” “Under these circumstances
we cannot react positively to those calling us to compromise,”
Aliyev stated.

Last year, as reported by BBC Monitoring, Azerbaijani Defense
Minister General Safar Abiyev said that occasional violations of
the cease-fire were “natural” since Azerbaijan is still “at war.”
Statements like this not only undermine the peace process, but can
also serve to actually encourage attacks against Armenia.

Just this month, NATO cancelled its Cooperative Best Effort (CBE)
2004 exercises in Baku, Azerbaijan after the government of
Azerbaijan barred Armenia from participating. U.S. General James
Jones, Supreme Commander of Allied Forces in Europe, expressed
regret over Azerbaijan’s refusal to honor its host obligations to
accept delegates from all interested partners. As part of its
commitment to international security in the Caucasus, Armenia
welcomed both Azerbaijan and Turkey to participate in the NATO CBE
2003 exercises in Yerevan, Armenia.

Efforts to reinforce stability and reduce the risk of conflict are
in the best interests of the United States and the region. The
Nagorno Karabakh peace process will achieve nothing if Azerbaijan
is allowed to risk war and predict ethnic cleansing with impunity.
To this end, we urge that you condemn these remarks and call upon
the government of Azerbaijan to desist from making any further
threats against Armenia and Nagorno Karabagh.

Sincerely,

www.anca.org

Israel’s Christians spitting mad

Israel’s Christians spitting mad
By Inigo Gilmore in Jerusalem
(Filed: 13/10/2004)

The Daily Telegraph, UK
Oct 13 2004

Christians in Jerusalem have attacked what they say is the increasingly
common phenomenon of ultra-orthodox Jews spitting on them.

The statement followed a brawl between an orthodox Jewish yeshiva
(religious school) student and an Armenian archbishop.

They clashed in Jerusalem’s Old City after the student spat at a
cross being carried by the clergyman during a procession near the
Church of the Holy Sepulchre.

Archbishop Nourhan Manougian slapped the student and in the ensuing
scuffle, his 17th century ceremonial medallion was broken.

Both were questioned by police and the student is facing charges. He
has been banned from the Old City for 75 days. The Armenians say the
action was inadequate.

Archbishop Manougian told an Israeli newspaper that Israeli leaders
must speak out about the “daily” abuse. “When there is an attack
against Jews anywhere, the Israeli government is incensed, so why when
our religion and pride are hurt, don’t they take harsher measures?” he
asked.

His critique has encouraged other Christian leaders to speak out,
including a senior Greek Orthodox clergyman who has disclosed that
he was recently approached by an elderly man wearing a skullcap who
spat in his face.

Daniel Rossing, the director of a Jerusalem centre for Christian-Jewish
dialogue, said there had been an increase in such incidents recently as
“part of a general lack of tolerance”.

Turkey’s chance / The Muslim country deserves a bid to join the EU

Editorial: Turkey’s chance / The Muslim country deserves a bid to join the EU

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Pittsburgh Post Gazette
Oct 12 2004

The European Commission recommended Wednesday that talks begin next
year on whether to admit Turkey to the European Union.

A final decision on whether to hold talks won’t be made until
December when the 25 EU heads of state meet, but they are expected to
accept the commission’s recommendation unanimously.

That’s good news for Turkey, but it does not mean the country is in.
Negotiations could take as long as 15 years. That is as it should be,
given both the gravity of the decision and the reservations held by
some EU leaders and their nations’ people.

Here is why Turkey is a hard case. It has a population of 71 million
and, if admitted to the EU, would be second in size only to Germany.
It is also 99 percent Muslim, and some Europeans see the EU’s at
least nominally Christian orientation as important to its nature.
Turkey is also relatively poor, at a time when the EU is wrestling
with the economic challenges of adding 10 new countries last May —
countries whose standards of living were below EU levels.

The admission of Turkey has geopolitical ramifications as well.
Adding it will give the EU common borders with difficult countries
like Iraq, Iran, Syria, Armenia and Georgia, presenting new potential
problems for the organization.

Just the same, there are good reasons for the EU to include Turkey.
Europe needs the large, young population of Turkey to help it remain
productive; labor is short in most of Western Europe. Turkey wants
very much to join the EU and has already made important changes to
try to meet the EU’s requirements.

More importantly in global terms, adding Turkey, a democratic Muslim
country, to the EU — in effect, to Europe — could be helpful in
steering the world away from increasing polarization between
Christian and Muslim societies.

The war in Iraq, Western inattention to the problem between the
Israelis and Palestinians and friction between Muslim immigrant
groups and governments in Western Europe have opened the West to
charges of religious and racial discrimination. Turkey as a member of
the EU would help drive a stake through the heart of that old,
unwelcome ghost.

The European Commission was right to recommend the beginning of talks
and we encourage the EU heads of state to approve its recommendation
in December. At the same time, the process should unfold at a
measured pace, permitting thorough negotiation of issues that might
lead, ultimately, to a more perfect union between Turkey and the rest
of Europe.

ASBAREZ Online [10-07-2004]

ASBAREZ ONLINE
TOP STORIES
10/07/2004
TO ACCESS PREVIOUS ASBAREZ ONLINE EDITIONS PLEASE VISIT OUR
WEBSITE AT <;HTTP://

1) Writer Paulo Coelho Receives Praise in Armenia
2) French Politicians Seek Debate, Vote on Turkey
3) Pallone Calls on Powell To Protest Turkish Law Criminalizing Discussion of
the Armenian Genocide
4) CIS Parliamentary Assembly to Review Armenian Genocide Recognition
5) ANCA Urges Legislators To Adopt Key Pro-Armenia Trade Measure Before
Congress Ends Session

1) Writer Paulo Coelho Receives Praise in Armenia

YEREVAN (Armenpress)–Prominent Brazilian novelist Paulo Coelho met with
President Kocharian on October 7 to discuss the role of culture and literature
in educating the new generation.
Coelho, who is visiting Armenia at the invitation of the Hamazkayin cultural
organization, is well-known for his powerful storytelling technique and
profound spiritual insights.
The president remarked that Coelho’s works erode the boundary between reality
and fantasy in the best traditions of Latin American literary heritage. The
president also said the Armenian translation of one of his most acclaimed
works, The Alchemist, has become accessible to Armenian readers.
On October 5, the auditorium of the Armenian Writers’ Union was packed to
honor the author. Chairman of Armenian Writers’ Union Levon Ananyan, praised
The Alchemist as an outstanding piece of modern literature and presented a
membership card of honor to Coelho.
In his speech, Coelho spoke of the Armenia as a motherland which has children
around the world, who come back to their motherland and enrich its culture
with
the elements of different civilizations.

2) French Politicians Seek Debate, Vote on Turkey

PARIS (Reuters)–French politicians opposed to Turkey joining the European
Union called on Thursday for a debate and vote in parliament before a December
summit at which the EU will decide whether to start accession talks. The
demand
highlighted splits in France that could undermine Turkey’s entry bid and
increased pressure on President Jacques Chirac over the issue, one day after
the European Commission recommended Ankara be allowed to open entry talks.
Ignoring an appeal for calm by Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin, about 50
deputies from Chirac’s conservative Union for a Popular Movement (UMP) party
and the center-right Union for the French Democracy (UDF) wrote to the
president seeking a meeting with him on Turkey.
They also demanded a debate before the EU’s December summit. Prominent
politicians seeking a vote in the 577-seat parliament, as well as a debate,
include Laurent Fabius, a Socialist former prime minister and possible
presidential candidate in 2007.
“No negotiations have ever started without them ending up in a ‘yes’,” Fabius
told reporters, reflecting the concerns of some French politicians that
Turkey’s entry is an accomplished and presumably irreversible fact and that
they will not be properly consulted.
UDF head Francois Bayrou said such an historic decision had to pass through
parliament as well as be put to a referendum “as an elementary rule of
democracy.”
Jean-Marie Le Pen, leader of the hard-right National Front, voiced his
concerns too. “Once negotiations start, there’ll be no turning back whatever
happens,” he said.
Parliamentary speaker Jean-Louis Debre, a Chirac ally, has said a
parliamentary debate on Turkey’s membership can be organized but not a vote.
Even a debate could embarrass Chirac because it would underline the divisions
over Turkey.

REASSURANCE BY RAFFARIN

Raffarin seemed determined to head off controversy by saying there was
nothing
immediate or definitive.
“Let’s talk straight. Turkey’s not going to be in a position to join the
European Union in the coming years but we can’t shut the door for eternity,”
Raffarin told Metro, a publication that is distributed free of charge in Paris
and other big cities.
“Let’s not allow partisan politics to draw the curtains on a matter that
needs
time,” he said, highlighting that Turkey would need big progress on reform
before joining the EU and that there was a clause allowing suspension of talks
after they opened.
The Commission says Turkey has made substantial progress in political reforms
but must improve implementation, notably in the fight against torture, and
expand freedom of expression and religion, and rights for women, trade unions,
and minorities.
Chirac announced last Friday that France would hold a referendum on entry if
the EU agrees to accession, despite the risk that France could block its
membership.
He made the move under pressure from his ruling Union for a Popular Movement
(UMP).
Although a referendum is unlikely for more than a decade, a recent opinion
poll showed 56 percent of French people oppose Turkey’s immediate entry
because
of fears over jobs and concerns about letting in a mainly Muslim country that
straddles the divide between Europe and Asia.
France, a predominantly Catholic country which is also home to Europe’s
biggest Jewish and Muslim communities, did not hold a referendum before the EU
expanded to 25 members in May.
French people are concerned that France’s influence in the EU has been
diluted
by enlargement and that the entry of a country of 71 million people will water
it down more.

3) Pallone Calls on Powell To Protest Turkish Law Criminalizing Discussion of
the Armenian Genocide

WASHINGTON, DC (ANCA)–Congressional Armenian Caucus Co-Chairman Frank Pallone
(D-NJ) this week called on Secretary of State Colin Powell to formally protest
Turkey’s adoption of a new penal code that criminalizes even the discussion of
the Armenian genocide.
Section 306 of new Turkish penal code provides for prison sentences of
between
three and ten years for remarks concerning the facts of the Armenian genocide
or the withdrawal of Turkish occupation forces from Cyprus. In his letter,
Congressman Pallone noted that this action represents a “hardening [of
Turkey’s] anti-Armenian stance and undermines hopes for a reduction of
tensions
in the region.”
Commenting specifically on the Administration’s opposition to the Genocide
Resolution (H.Res.193 and S.Res.164), Rep. Pallone said, “We have been told,
recently and in the past, that the State Department and the Administration
have
fought so strenuously against this legislation, because its adoption would
somehow harm progress in the region toward the normalization of ties between
these two states. This line of reasoning is, in my view, deeply flawed.
However, if the State Department were to seriously rely on this argument
concerning improved Turkey-Armenia relations, it would stand to reason that
the
State Department should also publicly and privately condemn Turkey’s patently
hateful codification of its official campaign to deny the Armenian genocide.”
“Armenian Americans, having endured years of attacks on efforts to recognize
the Armenian genocide, remain profoundly troubled by the hypocrisy of a State
Department that never hesitates to openly protest–and strenuously work
against–legislation before Congress commemorating this crime, yet seems
perpetually unable to summon the will to utter even a single word of concern
regarding Turkey’s hateful and shameless campaign of genocide denial,” said
ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian.

The full text of Congressman Pallone’s letter is provided below.

Dear Secretary Powell,

I write to you today to bring your attention to a recent troubling
development
in Turkey. Just this past week, Turkey adopted a new penal code that
represents a dramatic display of the Turkish government’s campaign to deny the
Armenian Genocide and further inhibit a resolution to the Turkish
occupation of
Northern Cyprus. This new criminal code not only hinders improved relations
between the Republic of Armenia and Turkey, but it is also an imprudent
step on
the part of a nation that is desperately trying to establish an image of
having
a free and democratic society.
Section 306 of this new criminal code would punish individual Turkish
citizens
or groups that confirm the fact of the Armenian Genocide in Ottoman Turkey or
call for the end of the Turkish occupation of Northern Cyprus–with up to ten
years in prison. Far from coming to terms with the Genocide or reaching out to
Armenia-Turkey, in adopting Section 306 of its new penal code, is hardening
its
anti-Armenian stance and undermining hopes for a reduction of tensions in the
region.
I would like, for a moment, to discuss why I consider it important that the
State Department not remain silent in the face of this extremely troubling
restriction on freedom of expression mandated by a NATO ally. In the past,
when
the State Department has spoken out against an Armenian Genocide
Resolution, it
has argued that such legislation would not contribute to improved
Turkish-Armenian relations. We have been told, recently and in the past, that
the State Department and the Administration have fought so strenuously against
this legislation, because its adoption would somehow harm progress in the
region toward the normalization of ties between these two states.
This line of reasoning is, in my view, deeply flawed. However, if the State
Department were to seriously rely on this argument concerning improved
Turkey-Armenia relations, it would stand to reason that the State Department
should also publicly and privately condemn Turkey’s patently hateful
codification of its official campaign to deny the Armenian Genocide, the most
recent attempt being in the form of a repressive and unjustified new criminal
code.
Section 306 of the new criminal code does nothing to remove barriers to
bilateral cooperation and lower the level of distrust and tension in this
critically important region. I urge you and the State Department to condemn
this oppressive provision in the criminal code and do everything that is in
your power to ensure that the government of Turkey, our NATO ally-cease to
inhibit the rights of its citizens; remove its troops from Northern Cyprus;
come to terms with its own history; and finally start living up to the
expectations that the United States has of free and democratic nations.

4) CIS Parliamentary Assembly to Review Armenian Genocide Recognition

YEREVAN (Combined Sources)–The permanent defense and security commission of
the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) Parliamentary Assembly decided on
Thursday to review recognition of the Armenian genocide during its 2005
session.
The proposal came from the Russian Federation’s Prosecutor General’s office,
and was approved by session participants.
Parliamentary representatives of CIS member countries, who were meeting in
Yerevan, Armenia, also reviewed a number of model legislative programs to
combat crime and trading of illegal substances, as well as military-technical
cooperation.
Absent from the session were representatives of Georgia, Azerbaijan,
Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.

5) ANCA Urges Legislators To Adopt Key Pro-Armenia Trade Measure Before
Congress Ends Session

–Urges Adoption of Provision as Part of Larger Trade Measure

WASHINGTON, DC–With the 108th session of Congress coming to an end, the
Armenian National Committee of America is urging legislators to include a
pro-Armenia trade measure, spearheaded by Congressional Armenian Caucus
Co-Chairman Joe Knollenberg (R-MI) and Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY), in the
final version of a larger trade bill set to be approved before the end of this
week.
The US House, last November, approved Permanent Normal Trade Relations Status
(PNTR) for Armenia, opening the door to expanded US-Armenia commercial
relations. The Senate version of this legislation, known as the Miscellaneous
Trade and Technical Corrections Act of 2004 (H.R.1047), did not include the
PNTR for Armenia provision. As a result, the Congressional leadership has
assigned a “conference committee” to reconcile the two different versions of
this legislation. The conferees include Ways and Means Committee Chairman,
Rep.
Bill Thomas (R-CA); Trade Subcommittee Chairman, Rep. Phil Crane (R-IL); Rep.
E. Clay Shaw (R-FL); Ways and Means Ranking Democrat, Rep. Charles Rangel
(D-NY); Trade Subcommittee Ranking Democrat, Rep. Sander Levin (D-MI); Senate
Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN); Finance Committee Chairman, Sen. Charles
Grassley (R-IA), and; Finance Committee Ranking Democrat, Sen. Max Baucus
(D-MT).
The ANCA has asked Armenian Americans to call on their Senators and
Representative to urge the conferees to include PNTR for Armenia in the final
version of the bill approved by Congress. The ANCA action alert can be found
at:

The sample letter for activists includes several reasons to support this
legislation, among them:

* Increased US-Armenia trade and investment advances US foreign policy by
strengthening Armenia’s free market economic development and integration into
the world economy.

* Expanded US-Armenia commercial relations will strengthen bilateral
relations
and reinforces the enduring friendship between the American and Armenian
peoples.

* Adoption of PNTR for Armenia will help offset– no cost to US
taxpayers–the
devastating impact of the dual Turkish and Azeri blockades, estimated by the
World Bank as costing Armenia up to a third of its entire GDP (as much as $720
million annually) and half of its exports.

The Trade Act of 1974 excluded all Soviet countries from having normal trade
relations (NTR) status with the United States. One particular provision of the
Act, known as the Jackson-Vanik amendment, required the President to deny NTR
to those countries
that restricted free emigration. The policy was adopted, in part, in response
to Communist government restrictions on the emigration of Jews. According to
the terms of the Jackson-Vanik amendment, when the President determines that
freedom of emigration rights have been reinstated in a country, normal trade
relations may be granted. To maintain NTR, the President must report to
Congress twice a year that Jackson-Vanik requirements have been met. While
successive Presidents have waived the Jackson-Vanik Amendment restrictions on
Armenia during the past decade, the passage of the Knollenberg bill would
grant
Armenia permanent normal trade relations status, without the need for
semi-yearly Presidential determinations.

All subscription inquiries and changes must be made through the proper carrier
and not Asbarez Online. ASBAREZ ONLINE does not transmit address changes and
subscription requests.
(c) 2004 ASBAREZ ONLINE. All Rights Reserved.

ASBAREZ provides this news service to ARMENIAN NEWS NETWORK members for
academic research or personal use only and may not be reproduced in or through
mass media outlets.

http://www.asbarez.com/&gt
HTTP://WWW.ASBAREZ.COM
WWW.ASBAREZ.COM
www.anca.org

Armenian-US working group discuss wide-ranging issues

Armenian-US working group discuss wide-ranging issues

Mediamax news agency
6 Oct 04

YEREVAN

The ninth session of the US-Armenian Task Force on economic
cooperation took place on 4 October in Washington, the press service
of the Armenian Foreign Ministry told our agency today.

The session discussed issues pertaining to the implementation of a
poverty reduction strategy in Armenia, maintaining a higher rate of
economic growth, an improvement in social conditions, reforms in the
banking sector and the development of power, agriculture and water
systems.

The Armenian delegation included Finance and Economy Minister Vardan
Khachatryan; the presidential aide Vagram Nersisyants; the chairman of
the Central Bank, Tigran Sarkisyan; the chairman of the State
Committee for Water Resources, Andranik Andreasyan; and the Armenian
ambassador to the USA, Aram Kirakosyan.

Ethnic Rally & Rountable with Amb. Holbrooke–OH 10/6 & 10/7

National Ethnic Outreach
Contact: George Kivork <[email protected]>

Please note the following events with Ambassador Richard Holbrooke and
his wife Kati Marton, in Ohio on Wednesday and Thursday.

Multi-ethnic Rally

The ethnic community in Toledo will be gathering at the Hungarian Club
for a rally with Amb. Holbrooke, his wife Kati Marton, and St. Rep Peter
Ujvagi.
Date: Wednesday, October 6, 2004
Time: Arrive at 6:00PM
Location: Hungarian Club of Toledo, 224 Paine Ave
For more details please contact Rep. Peter Ujvagi at 419-779-0255 or
e-mail [email protected]

Mutli-Ethnic Policy Roundtable

This is a private policy discussion with ethnic leadership and
Ambassador Richard Holbrooke
Date: Thursday, October 7th
Location: Sheraton City Center Hotel
Time: Arrive at 3:15
For more details contact Seamus [email protected] by Tuesday
morning.

–gK

George Kivork
National Director of Ethnic Outreach
202-464-2838