Armenian authorities have tough position on attempts to interfere into Armenia’s domestic politics by any country – Ararat Mirzoyan

Armenian authorities have tough position on attempts to interfere into Armenia’s domestic politics by any country – Ararat Mirzoyan

Save

Share

17:35,

YEREVAN, JUNE 18, ARMENPRESS. The authorities of Armenia have a tough position on any attempts of interfering in the domestic politics of countries by any another country, ARMENPRESS reports President of the National Assembly of Armenia Ararat Mirzoyan told the reporters at the parliament, referring to the question that if summoning the Russian Ambassador to the Foreign Miinistry of Armenia and  having with him a conversation in the context of non-interfering in the domestic politics of Armenia means that Armenian authorities toughen position.

''No, we have a tough position on any attempt by any country of the world to observe any possibility to interfere into the domestic politics of our country’', Mirzoyan said, adding that he has had numerous meetings with the Russian Ambassador in the past and have discussed a lot of questions, including that of respecting the sovereignty of one another.

Referring to the meeting between the Russian Ambassador and former President of Armenia Robert Kocharyan, the head of the legislative said that personally he does not welcome that meeting. ''I am not talking about that the Ambassador of any country should not meet with any representative of Armenia's political field, but I am talking about that the meeting takes place with someone against whom very serious charges are pressed and a trial is still underway, so any meting con be viewed as interference», Mirzoyan clarified.

Ambassador of Russia to Armenia Sergey Kopirkin visited 2ndPresident of Armenia Robert Kocharyan on June 13, the meeting lasted more than one hour. Head of Kocharyan’s Office Victor Soghomonyan told that he can provide no more information in addition to confirming the meeting.

Chair of the Standing Committee on Foreign Relations of the National Assembly of Armenia Ruben Rubinyan informed on June 17 that Russian Ambassador to Armenia Sergey Kopirkin had been summoned to the foreign ministry of Armenia in the context of non-interfering in the domestic politics of Armenia.

Edited and translated by Tigran Sirekanyan




168: Pashinyan wants Kocharyan to pay $1350 in court costs after settled defamation lawsuit

Category
Politics

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan is demanding ex-President Robert Kocharyan to pay 650,000 drams ($1350) in court costs after the parties reached a settlement in a defamation suit.

Kocharyan had sued Pashinyan for a 2018 statement claiming that the PM publicly defamed him. However the former president dropped the suit after Pashinyan said the statement didn’t personally target him. The parties were not personally in court today on June 13th.

Pashinyan’s attorney Gevorg Gyozalyan told reporters his client’s only source of income is the salary and that the premier has spent 650,000 drams on legal services during the lawsuit.

“I believe in order for such ungrounded suits to be prevented in the future against my client, indeed we will be coherent in order for this issue to be solved and those who will file an ungrounded suit against my client will have to pay for it,” Gyozalyan said.

However, Kocharyan’s lawyer Hayk Alumyan said the amount is “unreasonable”, and even claimed that factually court proceedings didn’t even take place, referring to the brief duration.

The court will deliver a ruling over the matter on June 24th.

Pashinyan demanded 650 thousand drams from Kocharyan as compensation

Arminfo, Armenia
Tatevik Shahunyan

 

ArmInfo.The lawyer of the second president of Armenia Robert Kocharyan Hayk Alumyan today at the court session of the court of general jurisdiction of Yerevan completely abandoned the civil lawsuit against Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, obliging him to bring a public apology.

Despite this, Pashinyan's lawyer Gevorg Gyozalyan filed a complaint with the claimant for compensation in the amount of 650 thousand drams: "Kocharyan's defense was initially aware of the senselessness of his lawsuit, meanwhile, my client suffered financial losses by paying lawyers. Everyone knows that the only source my client's income is his salary, and in order to prevent further unreasonable lawsuits against him, we intend to get compensation this time, "said in an interview with journalists after a court session Gyozalyan. Meanwhile, the representative of Kocharyan Hayk Alumyan said that this amount is not reasonable. "The lawsuit on the claim did not take place. If this trial had taken place and lasted a long time, I myself would have presented a claim for compensation for expenses, and that would be appropriate." The court will announce a decision on this issue on June 24. To recall, the representative of the second President of Armenia Robert Kocharyan, Hayk Alumyan, filed a lawsuit in court, the subject of which was to oblige the respondent Nikol Pashinyan to make a public apology for the following statement: >.

At yesterday's court session, Nikol Pashinyan's representative, lawyer Gevorg Gyozalyan, assured that Nikol Pashinyan's statements were not addressed to Robert Kocharyan: . Therefore, Kocharyan's defense in court refused the lawsuit.

Artsakh leader: It’s the duty of each and every Armenian to maintain national unity

Panorama, Armenia
June 6 2019

Artsakh Republic President Bako Sahakyan has hailed the ongoing consultations with the Armenian authorities as a very honest and principled process aiming to achieve a final settlement in the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict.

In an interview with Artsakhpress on Wednesday, Bako Sahakyan also re-emphasized the importance of returning Artsakh to the peace talks to avoid unnecessary speculations.

The full interview published by Artsakhpress is presented below:

– Mr. President, during a briefing with journalists today, Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan stated that the leadership of Artsakh was unaware of the details of the negotiations over the Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh) conflict settlement during the term of office of the former Armenian government. Was the official Stepanakert really unaware of those details? 

– When Nikol Pashinyan assumed the office of Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia, the process of negotiations was one of the first issues that we discussed. I can view the discussions as sincere and of principle.

Recently, the Armenian PM provided me with some documents on the process of negotiations. In its turn, the Artsakh leadership transmitted its package of documents to the prime minister.

In general, in the past and now, the Armenian authorities would keep the leadership of Artsakh aware of the issues discussed and latest developments before and after negotiations with Azerbaijan.

Overall, I would like to emphasize that restoration of the full format of negotiations, that is, with the direct participation of Artsakh, is the best and perhaps the only opportunity to disallow speculations.

– Prime Minister Pashinyan also declared that there are certain conspirators and representatives of the government of Artsakh who urge their assistants to post comments on Facebook stating that Pashinyan is selling lands. What do you have to say about this?

– I have been asked similar questions, particularly during my meeting with members of the My Step faction of the National Assembly of Armenia and journalists on May 20 this year. I said if there are conspirators, they will be punished, and if anyone knows of specific people and has evidential facts of conspiracy, they should let us know about that, and we will take appropriate actions.

Unity is one of the major achievements of the Armenians, and I consider any step aimed at destroying that unity inadmissible, be it in Artsakh, Armenia or the Diaspora. If anyone has doubts about or lack of confidence in this or that phenomenon, person or official, I think it is important to discuss them and come to terms in an atmosphere of mutual respect. We have one homeland, and it's the duty of each and every Armenian to maintain national unity.

President Sarkissian, Chinese FM Wang Yi laud “millennia-old” cooperation history between two nations

President Sarkissian, Chinese FM Wang Yi laud “millennia-old” cooperation history between two nations

Save

Share

16:42,

YEREVAN, MAY 26, ARMENPRESS. President of Armenia Armen Sarkissian held a meeting on May 26 with visiting Chinese Foreign Minister, State Councilor Wang Yi.

Welcoming the delegation, President Sarkissian said the recent high-level official visits are contributing to enhancing the Armenian-Chinese relations that are based on friendship, mutual trust and respect, Sarkissian’s Office said in a readout.

“The friendship between our nations did not start with the 1992 establishment of diplomatic and inter-governmental relations, our nations have a history of friendly cooperation spanning through centuries and millennia,” the Armenian President told Yi, adding that the Armenians and Chinese were successfully cooperating back during the Silk Road era.

The Chinese FM emphasized that the Armenians have a great contribution in the history of human civilization.

“The great Silk Road united our two peoples centuries ago. The Armenian and Chinese people treat each other with mutual respect and regard, and our bilateral relations are developing resolutely,” Yi said. He also conveyed Chinese President Xi Jinping’s greetings to the Armenian President.

During the meeting the parties also discussed the expansion of commercial ties, prospects of cooperation within the One Belt One Road initiative, as well as development of partnership in the new technology, education and science sectors.

Edited and translated by Stepan Kocharyan




Asbarez: Back to an Old Habit

Garen Yegparian

BY GAREN YEGPARIAN

I’ve been remiss the last few years. Going to and ever-so-briefly chronicling as many Los angeles-area Genocide commemorative events as possible is something I’ve always found important. Unfortunately, I haven’t done it, and now, it’s back, even though I made it to very few events this year. I’ll go in chronological order.

April 4 was the day of the first event I went to. It was the best one this year. It inspired my article last week. It was organized by UCLA students and featured a discussion titled “Beyond Awareness: What’s Next on the Post-Genocide Horizon” among RoA Consul General in Los Angeles Armen Baibourtian, State Senator Anthony Portantino, and attorney Armen Hovannisian moderated by Kate McIntosh who is the Executive Director of the Promise Institute. While only 39 people attended, this was probably the most substantive of the events that I was able to attend. It’s too bad our community is still so ghettoized that travelling to the UCLA campus from Glendale, Hollywood, North Hollywood, or even western parts of the San Fernando Valley is something that happens insufficiently. The other twist on this event is the scheduling conflict it created in that I missed my own city’s (Burbank) school board’s presentation of a resolution marking April 24.

The AYF’s tenth Cycle Against Denial was once again in Santa Monica and Venice on April 13. This potentially excellent event was once again attended by just under 100 people. I really hope the organizers return it to the San Fernando Valley, home of the organizing chapter. Most importantly, advertising and publicity for this event must begin much earlier and include outreach to the cycling community. These two factors – timely notice and targeted outreach – would, I have no doubt, triple or quadruple participation. Also, see below for another possible variation.

On April 16, the Burbank City Council issued its annual proclamation. I arrived late and missed the presentation, but I was informed council chambers were well attended during this presentation. Unfortunately, the vigil outside City Hall as a dud. When I arrived, it was already breaking up, having started and finished before darkness even fell, so the candles were ineffective. What is even more worrisome is that the same person who reported the respectable presence inside Burbank’s city hall was also present at Glendale’s City Council meeting earlier the same day. He was struck by the extremely poor attendance there. These types of situations ought to be a focal point for our efforts. They are embarrassing and speak to an apathy that can be quite harmful in any of our political pursuits.

April 23rd was a two-fer. I went to Abril Bookstore for a presentation by Wahi Kachichyan about his new book “Turkish Instinct or the Praise of Genocide”. The event was unusually sparsely attended and is the first time I have been disappointed by an event I attended at Abril (I probably make it there 5-6 times a year, and Arno, carrying on the tradition of his father, probably averages more than one event a week usually attended by 20 or more people in a very small space, and often bursting at the seams with 60 or more people). This is no reflection on Abril’s events, but on the author. I hope the root of my criticism lies in his lack of fluency in English. But the ideas Kachichyan presented seemed unrelated to the topic at hand in some cases, all over the map, criticisms (both apt and not) of our community, and even inaccurately explained. A member of the audience even whispered to me “who the f*** gave this guy a PhD?” I have yet to read the book, and hope it does a better job of making a case the title asserts. I had to race form this event to Montebello Martyrs Monument, where I arrived as the traditional vigil was ending with musical presentations and clerical participation. An accident delayed me further, after Kachichyan’s ramblings. A reliable source among the organizers told me estimated 400 people attended, which is the norm for this event.

On April 24th, Armenians Hiking + more organized a memorial hike. This year was the lowest attendance ever, sadly, with only seven participants. But the brief exchange of thoughts and feelings which occur at these hikes each year was the most substantive and intriguing ever. Harout Armenian discussed the challenge of conceiving, envisioning, what 1.5 million lost means. He posited a poster with pictures of 1000 of the victims, then imagining 1500 of those posters side-by-side; or, imagining that this meant at least 500,000 households impacted. Here, I remembered the idea form a decade ago of collecting 1.5 million pairs of donated shoes from churches across the U.S.A. who had helped the survivors through Near East Relief, then lining up those shoes on the Mall at the foot of the Washington Monument in the capital.

Afterward, I went to the demonstration at the Turkish consulate. The program was of a reasonable duration this year. A lot of people left long before it began. I noticed this because I arrived late and people were streaming in the opposite direction to their cars. By my count, there were some 5,700 people there. This was after many had already left, so it’s hard to say just how many people actually came. I suspect anything between 7,000 and 10,000 is plausible. But the biggest problem this year was a lack of spirit. It was pointed out to me by the family with whom I went. Contributing to this was the format of the event. Unlike other years, there was no marching and chanting, neither at the consulate where we used to march in circles, nor by starting at another point and walking to the destination. The result was a passive, ergo dis-engaged, role for those who came.

To my mind, the solution to multiple problems is organizing what I call “The Convergence.” A three-pronged descent upon the consulate would energize and maximize participation. Some of us would go to the Montebello Monument then form a miles-long car caravan to the consulate. Others would start at a manageable distance from the consulate, somewhere in Hollywood, perhaps the church on Vine Street and march. This might have the added benefit of reintegrating the group that has long chosen to stand apart (except on the centennial of the Genocide) and have a “circular” march and rally within Hollywood instead of joining the rest of the community. The third segment would form based on the AYF’s Cycle Against Denial and ride from the Valley to the consulate. Imagine the participation we would elicit and the attention we would draw.

Please share your thoughts and experiences from this year’s Genocide events, some of which are still being held and should be supported. That feedback is important to me and for organizers to do better in the future.

A1+: Why should a Swiss or American want to come to Armenia?

"When talking about economic changes, we should take into account how much preparation time we had and whether the state bodies were aware of the economic situation as much as needed. In this case, I can hardly answer whether there was an economic revolution or not," said Gagik Makaryan, President of the Union of Employers of Armenia.

Gagik Makaryan notes that there are certain complaints. One of them is that the majority of state officials are unable to create a motivated working environment in their departments. Another dissatisfaction is that the National Assembly is new and it includes mostly young people. There is still a problem of regulation with the role of oponent.
 
 According to the President of the Union of Employers of Armenia, there is certain activity only in terms of investments, but those who make investments are of Armenian descent.
 
"Investments for the economic revolution are very important and in this respect we have to consider how much we have the advantage of the developed countries and why the Swiss should want to come to Armenia," he said.

Karabakh teen kills 10-year-old brother under influence of computer game?

News.am, Armenia
Karabakh teen kills 10-year-old brother under influence of computer game? Karabakh teen kills 10-year-old brother under influence of computer game?

09:37, 20.04.2019
                  

Armenian News-NEWS.am has learned more about the murder of a 10-year-old in the Republic of Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh Republic/NKR).

According to preliminary information, the child was killed by his 17-year-old brother, and with particular brutality.

As per their relatives, the teen had killed his brother in the woods by inflicting him numerous injuries with knife and fork, then buried him in a pit, and then returned home.

According to the preliminary theory, the teenager had committed the crime under the influence of computer games.

Earlier, the Artsakh Police had informed Armenian News-NEWS.am that V. G. (born in 2009), a resident of Shahumyan Region of Artsakh, was killed on April 12.

Within the framework of the criminal case that was launched, his brother, S. G. (born in 2001), was detained on April 13, on suspicion of V. G.’s murder.

Expertise studies have been ordered.

The preliminary investigation is still in progress.

Թավշյա՞, թե՞ անաչառ. «Ազատությունը» պետք է պահպանի օբյեկտիվությունն ու քաղաքական բալանսը

  • 15.04.2019
  •  

  • Հայաստան
  •  

     

2
 75

ՀՀ-ում «Ազատություն» ռադիոկայանը, որը տարիներ շարունակ ու, մասնավորապես, նախկին իշխանությունների օրոք համարվել է այլընտրանքային ինֆորմացիայի և կարծիքի արտահայտման հարթակ, Նիկոլ Փաշինյանի իշխանության օրոք կարծես թե տրանսֆորմացվում է և սկսում է միակողմանի տեղակատվություն տրամադրել՝ իշխանություններին ներկայացնելով միայն դրական լույսի ներքո:


Նախկին իշխանությունների օրոք, երբ ԶԼՄ-ների մեծամասնությունը գտնվում էր հսկողության տակ և առկա էին որոշակի ցենզուրայի էլեմենտներ, «Ազատություն» ռադիոկայանի եթերն ու հարթակը տրամադրվում էր ընդդիմադիր քաղաքական գործիչների ու փորձագետների, որոնք խիստ քննադատության էին ենթարկում Սերժ Սարգսյանին ու նրա թիմին:


Թավշյա հեղափոխության օրերին «Ազատություն» ռադիոկայանը դարձել էր հեղափոխության օնլայն հեռարձակման հարթակ, որն ՀՀ-ում տեղի ունեցող իրադարձությունները ներկայացնում էր որպես ժողովրդավարության հաղթանակ և հասարակության արդարացի պահանջների կյանքի կոչում: Չմոռանանք, որ «Ազատություն» ռադիոկայանը ֆինանսավորվում է ԱՄՆ-ի Կոնգրեսի կողմից:


Նիկոլ Փաշինյանի իշխանության գալուց հետո «Ազատության» եթերում հիմնականում հայտնվում են իշխանության ներկայացուցիչները, որոնք գովերգում են Նիկոլ Փաշինյանին, թավշյա հեղափոխությունն ու ցանկացած առիթ բաց չեն թողնում մեղադրելու նախկին իշխանություններին բոլոր մեղքերի համար՝ սոցիալ-տնտեսականից մինչև քաղաքական բացթողումներ:


Ցանկացած ԶԼՄ-ի թիվ մեկ առաքելությունն օբյեկտիվ լուսաբանումն է և խոսքի ազատության հարթակի տրամադրումը բոլոր ուժերին՝ թե՛ ընդդիմադիր, որոնց դերում այժմ հանդես են գալիս Սերժ Սարգսյանն ու ՀՀԿ-ն, թե՛ իշխանական թիմի անդամներին բալանսը պահելու համար:


Վերջին շրջանում «Ազատությունը», կարծես, վերածվել է Նիկոլ Փաշինյանի անձնական PR-ով զբաղվող հարթակի, որտեղ ՀՀ կառավարության գործողությունները ներկայացվում են միայն դրական լույսի ներքո և բացակայում է Փաշինյանի խիստ քննադատությունը:


«Ազատության» տրանսֆորմացիան կարող է կապված լինել մի քանի պատճառների հետ: Առաջինը. Նիկոլ Փաշինյանին չքննադատելը կարող է լինել ԱՄՆ-ի ուղիղ ցուցումով, որպեսզի «Ազատության» հարթակը նոր կառավարության կողմից համարվի նրանց նկատմամբ լոյալ հարթակ, որը կզբաղվի նաև նրանց անթաքույց փիառով:


Երկրորդ. Նիկոլ Փաշինյանին քննադատելը կարող է համարվել նախկին իշխանություններին օգնելու կամ լատենտային տեսքով աջակցելու քայլ, ինչը նույնպես կարող է օվկիանոսից այն կողմ սխալ հասկացվել, ինչն էլ կազդի «Ազատության» ֆինանսավորման վրա:


Բացի այդ, Փաշինյանին քննադատելը կարող է ազդել նաև «Ազատության» ռադիոկայանի վարկանիշի ու դիտումների վրա: Այլ կերպ ասած, ԶԼՄ-ն կկորցնի իր լսարանը, քանի որ այսօր ՀՀ-ի կառավարությանն ու նրա առաջնորդին քննադատելը մեյնսթրիմ չի: