Tert.am: Armenia National Security Service chief appoints wedding’s best man to position

News.am, Armenia
July 8 2020
Tert.am: Armenia National Security Service chief appoints wedding's best man to position Tert.am: Armenia National Security Service chief appoints wedding's best man to position

18:49, 08.07.2020
                  

Argishti Kyaramyan appointed the best man at his wedding to a position ten days after he was appointed Director of the National Security Service of Armenia.

According to Tert.am newspaper, Artur Nahapetyan, who was Kyaramyan’s best man at his wedding, has been appointed to the position of Head of the Investigation Department of the National Security Service.

According to the source, this isn’t the only problematic appointment that Kyaramyan has made that has sparked complaints from employees of the Service.

Nahapetyan was appointed Head of the Social Sector Supervision Department when Kyaramyan was head of the State Supervision Service. Before that, Nahapetyan was an investigator of the Investigative Committee and a prosecutor in Armenia’s Shirak Province, as well as head of the First Division of the Inquest Department of the State Revenue Committee.

Turkey: Plan to Divide, Undermine Legal Profession

Human Rights Watch



Draft Law Reduces Leading Bar Associations’ Authority, Leads to
Creation of Rival Groups

July 8, 2020

(Istanbul) – The Turkish government’s plan to allow for multiple bar
associations appears calculated to divide the legal profession along
political lines and diminish the biggest bar associations’ role as
human rights watchdogs, Human Rights Watch and the International
Commission of Jurists said today. The current bar associations have
not been consulted, and 78 bars out of 80 signed a statement opposing
the plan.

Human Rights Watch and the International Commission of Jurists have
published a question and answer document explaining the draft law,
scheduled for a vote in parliament in the coming days. The document
outlines the government-led effort to reduce the influence of leading
bar associations, reflecting the executive’s growing dissatisfaction
with the bar associations’ public reporting on Turkey’s crisis for
human rights and the rule of law.

“Turkey’s prominent bar associations play a key role in defending fair
trial rights and scrutinizing human rights at a time when flagrant
violation of rights is the norm in Turkey,” said Hugh Williamson,
Europe and Central Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “The
government move to create multiple bars and dramatically cut leading
bars’ representation at the national level is a clear divide-and-rule
tactic to diminish the bar associations’ authority and watchdog role.”

The proposed amendments provide that in provinces with over 5,000
lawyers, a group of at least 2,000 lawyers can establish alternative
bar associations. In big cities such as Istanbul, Ankara, and Izmir,
several bar associations could be established. The amendments would
also greatly reduce the representation of the largest bar associations
at the national level within the Union of Turkish Bars, the
Ankara-based umbrella body with significant financial resources it
controls and distributes to provincial bars.

The fact that the vast majority of elected legal profession
representatives oppose the move and that the likely impact will be to
greatly diminish the authority of leading provincial bars that have
been critical of certain government initiatives demonstrates that the
aim of the proposed change is to shield the government from justified
criticism, Human Rights Watch and the International Commission of
Jurists said.

Drastically cutting the number of delegates from large bar
associations representing thousands of lawyers to the national Union
of Turkish Bar Associations would reduce the influence of the large
bar associations in electing the national group’s president and
participating meaningfully in other decision-making functions.

A provincial bar association with fewer than 100 lawyers, such as
Ardahan in northeastern Turkey, for example, would be represented by 4
delegates, compared with 3 at present. But a bar association such as
Izmir in western Turkey, with over 9,500 lawyers, which sends 35
delegates, would be entitled to only 5. Istanbul, Ankara, and Izmir
Bar, which represent 55 percent of the lawyers in Turkey, would be
entitled to only 7 percent of all delegates within the national union.

The atmosphere of conflict in which the draft law has been introduced,
its timing, and the lack of consultation with the bar associations
themselves provides credible grounds for great concern and skepticism
over the government’s motives, the groups said. Over the past year,
Turkey’s presidency and government have made public statements
strongly criticizing leading bar associations in response to the bars’
legitimate expression of concerns about Turkey’s rule of law crisis
and executive interference in the justice system. The government has
reacted strongly against the bars’ scrutiny of its failure to uphold
human rights obligations through bar association publication of
reports on torture, enforced disappearances, and other rights abuses
ignored by the authorities.

For these reasons, the government’s proposed amendments are clearly
designed to achieve a political purpose unrelated to an effort to
advance or strengthen standards in the legal profession, Human Rights
Watch and the International Commission of Jurists said. The
government’s move is politically divisive and will contribute to
undermining the appearance of independence and impartiality in the
justice system.

“The government should immediately withdraw the current proposed
amendment and embark on a process of full consultation with bar
associations,” said Roisin Pillay, director of the Europe and Central
Asia Programme at the International Commission of Jurists. “The
government’s plan as it stands will only deepen mistrust in Turkey’s
justice system as lacking independence by dividing the legal
profession along political lines. This could have disastrous long-term
consequences for upholding the role and function of lawyers and for
fair trial rights.”


 

Western media coverage of the police raid at Armenian opposition TV channels

Panorama, Armenia
July 4 2020

Number of western media outlets have covered the Friday incident in Yerevan when the police officers showed up  at two opposition TV stations and filed administrative proceedings for alleged violation of infection-prevention rules.

In its story, The New York Times (https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2020/07/03/world/europe/ap-eu-armenia-media.html?fbclid=IwAR0S90aEe4pV0d6O_BttkmYpN2bt8X0JLkolMMgsXxIoSXuf9MBg4BYzcgg) quoted Samvel Farmanyan, the co-owner of ArmNews TV station, saying the visit appeared to signal Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan's intent to “declare war on the media.” “He will suffer a shameful defeat,” said Farmanyan.

ArmNews executives said they had been told by the head of the national broadcasting commission that it wasn't mandatory for anchors to wear masks while on the air.

ABC News (https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/armenian-tv-stations-politics-police-checking-masks-71600739?fbclid=IwAR3dYa2jYbZSvYasMCHEU6l3rB13mbIhvDpiIj1MF1wM6owdj1frihSTBJA) reports that the police also visited another opposition-leaning TV station, Channel 5, to look into a similar complaint of anchors not wearing masks.

Both stations have been critical of Pashinyan's activities, closely scrutinizing his government's response to the coronavirus pandemic and its economic policies, said the source.

The incident was covered by the The Washington Times (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/armenian-tv-stations-see-politics-in-police-checking-masks/2020/07/03/f7eb6262-bd67-11ea-97c1-6cf116ffe26c_story.html?fbclid=IwAR3pgzsmDTjnvxun0MFNqOKvnUiuTbjIoPoQxiwmvln4QTHEbZeLMCX9WIk) as well.

Armenia’s SU-30 SM jets conducts 1st training with combat missiles

Save

Share

 18:10, 3 July, 2020

YEREVAN, JULY 3, ARMENPRESS. The SU-30 SM multirole fighter aircrafts of the Armed Forces of Armenia conducted the 1st training with combat missiles, ARMENPRESS reports Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan wrote on his Facebook page, posting a footage of the training.

‘’Yesterday our SU-30 SM jets carried out first training with combat missiles, testing air-to-surface missiles for attack operations. All targets were hit with high accuracy’’, Pashinyan wrote.

Armenia received the 1st batch of the SU-30 SM jets in December 2019.

Editing and translating by Tigran Sirekanyan

Opposition Parties Present ‘Crime Report’ to Prosecutor General


Representatives of the ARF, Prosperous Party of Armenia and the Homeland Party en route to the prosecutor general’s office on June 30

Representatives of opposition forces Prosperous Armenian Party, the Armenian Revolutionary Federation and the Homeland Party presented a “crime report” to Armenia’s Prosecutor General on Tuesday demanding a criminal investigation into the country’s legislature and other high-ranking officials in relation to constitutional amendments passed last week by parliament that alter the composition of Armenia’s Constitutional Court.

The parties’ representatives presented a nine-page document to the prosecutor general that, according to them, details a series of criminal breaches that they say amounts of high crimes.

After submitting the report, the three party representatives read a joint announcement and spoke to the press to expand on the concerns they had with the constitutional impasse in the country.

Last week the chairmen of the three parties met and decided to form a working group that would present a roadmap get Armenia out of the constitutional crisis. Their first act was the submission of the “crime report.”

Homeland Party member Arsen Babayan told reporters Tuesday outside of the prosecutor’s office that the document details the criminal efforts by the current regime during the past two years as they relate to the country’s judicial branch.

Babayan accused the authorities of breaking various laws to install Vahe Grigoryan on to the high court. He also pointed to Grigoryan’s effort to proclaim himself the chairman of the Constitutional Court, as well as last week’s amendment of the constitution to force three judges into early retirement and to alter the tenure of the current high court president, Hrayr Tovmasyan, against whom and his relatives the government has initiated criminal cases.

“We would like to rely on the Prosecutor General’s objectivity. The presented evidence has been more than substantiated and irrefutable. We anticipate that the judiciary will move forward exclusive through law,” said Prosperous Armenia Party representative Naira Zohrabyan, who is a member of the parliament and whose party, along with the second opposition force in the legislature, the Bright Armenia Party, boycotted the parliament hearing and vote on the constitutional amendment.

The Prosperous Armenia Party leader, businessman Gagig Tsarukyan was charged with embezzlement and election fraud earlier this month and parliament voted to lift his immunity to stand trial and be arrested. The prosecutor general’s office opted not to remand Tsarukyan to pre-trial custody but the investigation into the charges is moving forward.

ARF Supreme Council of Armenia member Lilit Galstyan speaks to reporters on June 30

“We are appealing to the prosecutor general expecting that the only guiding principle for the office will be the law, the rule of law and justice,” added Zohrabyan.

“During the past year and a half, various political forces have provided their assessments to that realities, events and what I would call the usurping of the judiciary in the Republic of Armenia,” said Lilit Galstyan a member of the ARF Supreme Council of Armenia.

“While there have been political assessment [of the situation] the one we are presenting also have legal merit… After the political assessment we are confident that the prosecutor general’s office and judicial bodies, objectively and within their parameters, will provide a just conclusion,” added Galstyan saying that the current regime, by circumventing the constitutional order, is guilty of breaching the constitutional order in Armenia.

Armenia fully ready to start visa liberalization talks – FM Mnatsakanyan

Save

Share

 19:51,

YEREVAN, JUNE 11, ARMENPRESS. The Armenian side is confident in its readiness to start the visa liberalization talks with the EU. Armenia is even ready to rapidly move to the completion of those talks, the result of which will be liberalization, ARMENPRESS reports Foreign Minister of Armenia Zohrab Mnatsakanyan said at the National Assembly.

‘’We consider that we have reached a level where the talks can be started. This is our approach based on adequate arguments’’, Mnatsakanyan said.

He noted that quite a lot of countries support Armenia in this issue, but added that this issue requires the consent of all the Member States. ‘’This is one of Armenia’s priorities in its relations with the EU’’, Zohrab Mnatsakanyan said, emphasizing that the visa liberalization has also political importance.

‘’People’s interactions has quite a significant importance for expanding and deepening relations’’, he emphasized.

Reporting by Anna Grigoryan, Editing and Translating by Tigran Sirekanyan

Armenia Investigative Committee chief on case against ex-Football Federation president

News.am, Armenia
June 9 2020

22:56, 09.06.2020
                  

Former President of the Football Federation of Armenia Ruben Hayrapetyan has been in Russia since February, and the criminal case regarding him was instituted in March-April. This is what Chairman of the Investigative Committee of Armenia Hayk Grigoryan told reporters today.

“The Investigative Committee has announced that there are accused-on-trial, some of whom are wanted and some are not.  In its turn, the Investigative Committee helped organize support for Hayrapetyan to come to Armenia through the Embassy of Armenia in Russia. During the investigation, we also found an order of the mayor of Moscow that allows people to leave the premises of their house to show up to criminal prosecution bodies while restrictions are in effect,” he said.

Armenian parliament halls ready for remote sessions

Save

Share

 20:37, 4 June, 2020

YEREVAN, JUNE 4, ARMENPRESS. Conditioned by the situation caused by coronavirus pandemic, the halls of the National Assembly of Armenia have been prepared for remote sessions and discussions, Chief of Staff and Secretary General of the Staff of the National Assembly Tigran Galstyan wrote on his Facebook page.

''The National Assembly of Armenia is ready for remote sessions and discussions'', he wrote, posting a photo.

A total of 11,221 coronavirus cases have been confirmed in Armenia. Death toll is 176. Another 68 deaths have been recorded for patients who were infected with coronavirus but died of other causes. A total of 63,459 tests have been done. 3,468 patients have recovered.  There are 7509 active cases. 697 new cases were reported today.

State of emergency has been prolonged until June 13 in Armenia.

Reporting by Norayr Shoghikyan, Editing and translating by Tigran Sirekanyan

Asbarez: EAFJD Executive Director’s Interview With Turkish ARTI TV

June 5, 2020

EAFJD Executive Director Heghine Eviyan (left) with ARTI TV host Lilit Gasparyan

The Executive Director of the European Armenian Federation for Justice and Democracy Heghine Evinyan gave an interview to the Turkish ARTI TV on May 29, for its journal “European Agenda,” prepared and presented by Lilit Gasparyan. Evinyan primarily commented on Erdogan’s recent statement where he called Armenian and Greek lobbies “evil forces that Turkey will continue to fight against.” A number of other questions concerning the Armenian Genocide and Turkish-Armenian relations were discussed.

Below is the transcript of the interview.

ARTI TV: The Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan called Armenian and Greek lobbies “evil forces” that Turkey will continue its fight against. How do you interpret Erdogan’s statement?

Heghine Evinyan: First of all, of course such statements are anything but helpful. Let us understand what the Armenian lobby is and who it actually consists of because there is a lot of mystification around it. As a matter of fact, the Armenian lobby is nothing more and nothing less than a number of grassroots organizations consisting of active citizens of various counties across the globe. In our case these are European citizens with Armenian heritage, the overwhelming majority of who are volunteers and simply people who are involved in the democratic processes in their home countries. So, the Armenian lobby consists of citizens, who are actively involved in civic activism and are legitimately and openly using the instruments that a democracy provides in order to make their voice heard and thus influence the political agenda in their countries. In this sense there is absolutely no difference between Greenpeace activists and the activists of the Armenian cause, in other words the Armenian lobby.

Therefore, by demonizing the Armenian lobby, Erdoğan in fact attacks democracy, civic activism and freedom of _expression_ as such. And in the case of the European-Armenians it simply means attacking the value system that many European democracies pride themselves in.

It is interesting to pay attention to the wording he uses. He calls the Armenian and the Greek lobbies “evil powers.” So, as I already mentioned, by demonizing, President Erdoğan plays with primal human instincts, notably with fear. He simply seeds fear in the Turkish society and in a way also propagates hate speech towards these groups of people. Unfortunately, this cannot lead anywhere meaningful or constructive.

I think it is important that the Turkish society knows who the Armenian lobby actually consists of. As I already mentioned, its overwhelming majority are activists who are successors of the survivors of the Armenian Genocide. These are simply active citizens who demand justice for what happened to their families, to the Ottoman Armenians and who are there to say: “Turkey cannot deny the Armenian Genocide because I am the living proof of the consequences of the Genocide.” They are there to tell the story of their family and say that Turkey cannot deny the fact that their grandparents were forced to leave their homeland and end up thousands of kilometers away from their home, often as orphans and the soul survivors of their families. They are there to say that Turkey cannot deny the fact that their whole family was uprooted. And so they demand that after the devastating consequences of the Armenian Genocide at least things are called with their names.

ARTI TV: Can you be more specific? What are the main activities and goals of the European Armenian Federation for Justice and Democracy ? – in order to understand what the Armenian lobby is doing.

H.E.: The European Armenian Federation for Justice and Democracy (EAFJD) is a Pan-European grassroots umbrella organization with chapters in thirteen European countries that represents a significant part of the Armenian diaspora in Europe. Throughout the years the European Armenian Federation has established itself as the main diaspora organization in Europe advocating for key Armenian issues in the European Union, its institutions, member states and international fora, such as the Council of Europe and the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly.

The EAFJD’s work is focused on the EU foreign policy in the Eastern Partnership countries (in particular in the South Caucasus) and in Turkey.

Using various tools of transparent grassroots advocacy, parliamentary and cultural diplomacy, the EAFJD advocates for stronger and more dynamic ties between the European Union, its Member states and the Republic of Armenia, the Republic of Artsakh (or Nagorno Karabakh). We also advocate for the safety and the fundamental right of the people of Artsakh to determine their own present and future and to live in peace and dignity. And of course, we advocate for the recognition and condemnation of the Armenian Genocide and as just reparations.

Being a grassroots organization, the EAFJD also fosters the vitality as well as the political and civic activism of the Armenian communities across Europe. The EAFJD also carries out independent international short-term election observations missions based on OSCE/ODHIR methodology.

ARTI TV: You mentioned cultural and parliamentary diplomacy. Based on your experience, how do you think the problems between the Armenian Diaspora and Ankara can be resolved?
I think that an open and honest discourse, dialogue are the way. No reconciliation can take place without acknowledging the truth and speaking it out. The truth, however ugly it is, is the remedy and the bridge to any kind of reconciliation. It is the in fact the path to liberation. There must a genuine willingness to listen to each other.

H.E.: The Turkish state must stop its state policy or propaganda of denialism of the Armenian Genocide. This should start with schools, for instance. The way history has been taught in Turkey for about a century and is still being taught leads to general indoctrination, so that the majority of the Turkish people either do not know that not so long ago there was a significant indigenous Armenian population in Turkey or they actually believe that the Armenians all of a sudden decided to leave their homes. But how often do they actually ask the question: how come a nation who has been living somewhere for millennia all of a sudden disappears or decides to leave one day.

The Turkish society has the right to know the truth about the foundations of the modern Turkish state, however painful this may be. They should be able to openly ask questions about that period of Turkish history and challenge the dogma expressed in the state propaganda without being called traitors or without being persecuted. The Turkish state must finally stop instrumentalizing fear.

ARTI TV: Tomorrow, if you had the opportunity to meet with a high-ranking Turkish official, what would you say and ask first?

H.E.: I would ask what their vision of Turkey actually is. How interested are they really in having Turkish citizens who are aware of their rights , who are not afraid of thinking freely and expressing themselves freely?

What we have been witnessing in the past years, what is going on nowadays and the way the backbone of the Turkish intelligentsia, civil society that had taken decades to develop, has been brutally broken by Erdogan’s government, unfortunately does not leave much space for optimism. I would also ask, how helpful is it to constantly challenge the right to existence of a neighboring country, in this case Armenia.

ARTI TV: For some time now, an important part of intellectuals and society in Turkey is commemorating the Armenian Genocide. What is your relationship with that segment of the society?

H.E.: We are on excellent terms with all the representatives of the Turkish society who have not chosen the path of blind denialism, among them there are many representatives of academia, journalists, activists. In fact we are grateful to these brave people, who very often putting in danger their lives, have been advocating for the truth, have been raising awareness in the Turkish society and advocating for thee recognition of the Armenian Genocide by the Turkish state. These people are democrats at heart. They are people who genuinely believe in human rights and true reconciliation. And they have been doing this because they know that the Turkish society needs the recognition of the Armenian Genocide at least as much as the Armenians need it. They know that it would function as some kind of deep surgery which is painful but which ultimately leads to a healthier and stronger Turkish society. Besides, this would certainly contribute to raising Turkey’s reputation in the world. This goes without saying.

Unfortunately, many of these people have been forced to leave Turkey and are in exile nowadays. For instance, such bright individuals as Professor Taner Akçam, Ragip Zarakolu cannot live in Turkey any more, otherwise their lives would clearly be in danger. The Erdogan government continues harassing them even when they are abroad. For example, the persecution against Ragip Zarakolu continues.

The EAFJD has also been in touch with political organizations. For example, upon the invitation of HDP, our organization has twice carried out election observation missions in Turkey, during the general elections in 2015 because the EAFJD has the know-how to carry out such election observation missions.

But of course, with the crackdown of the Turkish authorities on democracy in the country and all those standing up for it, the situation has become much more complex for us.

ARTI TV: Hrant Dink thought that the Armenian issue could be resolved only between Turkey and the Armenians and was not in favor of third party diplomatic and parliamentary interventions. What do you think about this?

H.E.: Hrant Dink was an extraordinary person and intellectual who was able to reach peoples’ hearts, make them reflect on history, who had the wisdom and the charisma to make a change. He was a person who was capable of breaking stereotypes and building bridges of trust while speaking out the truth. And unfortunately, we saw what happened to him. This was the reason why he was perceived as a danger by the Turkish authorities and Turkish nationalists. And was finally tragically assassinated.

Indeed, nothing can replace a direct and honest communication between the peoples. But the conditions for this communication have to be there. The Turkish authorities have been and are pursuing a denialist policy and seeding fear, punishing the handful of Turkish people who still dare to speak out. And we all know that denialism is the last stage of a Genocide.

The Turkish authorities should know that as long as they pursue this policy of covering things up, not allowing a genuine and open discourse, threatening the Republic of Armenia or Armenians and questioning the right of Armenia to exist, the Armenians have no choice but continue to raise awareness and seek justice elsewhere.

Besides, the Armenian Genocide is a crime against humanity, so it concerns also the rest of the world. And the world also still has lessons to learn from. We do absolutely need to raise awareness about what happened – about the Armenian Genocide. And the international community must be aware of it and draw consequences, since any crime that is not punished, is doomed to repeat.

ARTI TV: According to you, will the opening of the Turkish-Armenian border be a positive development?

H.E.: Indeed, opening of the borders without any preconditions would be a very positive step. It would enable to have a more dynamic people-to-people contact, break the stereotypes which is crucial to overcome deep-seated fear and simply have favorable and normal neighborly relations. It would certainly have economic benefits both for Armenia and the Eastern part of Turkey.

But of course, it is clear that Turkey has to openly deal with its past, recognize the Armenian Genocide and being the legal successor of the Ottoman Empire, also undertake responsibility for what happened. It is also clear that acknowledging the historic truth or demanding justice should never be a bargaining chip for anything, because it would simply mean sweeping things under the carpet, which is neither a sustainable solution nor it is a healthy way of dealing with the this painful part of our history

Armenia advocate: ECHR’s advisory opinion laid foundation for start of justice

News.am, Armenia
June 1 2020
Armenia advocate: ECHR's advisory opinion laid foundation for start of justice Armenia advocate: ECHR's advisory opinion laid foundation for start of justice

23:57, 01.06.2020
                  

Member of the Chamber of Advocates of Armenia, representative of the My Voice Project Asya Ovanyan has written the following:

“The advisory opinion of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights of this year laid the foundation for the start of justice.

The advisory opinion of the ECHR contains in-depth justifications and reasoning. The ECHR has stated that the ‘blanket reference’ may be applicable and legitimate only if it is sufficiently clear and foreseeable. A legal norm itself must provide a person with the opportunity to foresee possible liability provided for by law in case of specific rule of conduct. Formulation of such ‘blanket reference’ may not be such that the scope of the act is expanded.

Consequently, the Prosecutor General’s Office of Armenia must substantiate the _expression_ of the reference to part 1 of Articles 1-6 of the Constitution of Armenia in Article 300.1 of the Criminal Code. The ECHR stated that the most effective way of ensuring clarity and foreseeability was for the reference to be explicit and for the referencing provision to set out the constituent elements of the offense. From the perspective of legal technique, the validity of Article 300.1 of the Criminal Code is strictly disputed since the specific articles of the Constitution of 2005 listed in the article still haven’t been brought into compliance with the Constitution of 2015, and this leads to unconstitutionality of the reference.

The ECHR clearly sees a problem with the retroactivity of Article 300.1 and has clearly stated that the norms tightening the corpus delicti can’t be retroactive. Evaluation of the principle of retroactivity must be particularly given in the context of the practice of enforcement of that article. As a unified body, the Prosecutor General’s Office must be guided by the approach to not contradict its actions of the past and discontinue persecution under the case of the events of March 1, 2008.

And finally, the Constitutional Court of Armenia must give responses to these issues, and in the legal sense, the bodies investigating the case must be responsible. It will be impossible to avoid taking responsibility and leave it up to political authorities. As a result, the case will either be dismissed, or a court judgment on acquittal will be rendered. The case will be examined with several episodes at higher international tribunals, and I say this with regret, but the potential decisions against Armenia won’t be a surprise for anyone.”