BAKU: Turkey, Armenia Prepare To Sign New Roadmap, Political Scienti

TURKEY, ARMENIA PREPARE TO SIGN NEW ROADMAP, POLITICAL SCIENTIST

news.az
April 8 2010
Azerbaijan

Vafa Guluzade New roadmap may indicate the terms of opening borders
between Turkey and Armenia and the issue of Karabakh will be indicated
between the lines.

Political scientist Vafa Guluzade has commented on the upcoming
visit of Feridun Sinirlioglu, deputy foreign minister of Turkey and
personal envoy of prime minister to Azerbaijan immediately after his
Yerevan voyage.

"They seem to prepare to sign a new roadmap between Turkey and
Armenia and Erdogan wants to include the issue of Karabakh to this new
document. It seems that Sinirlioglu is preparing to visit Baku after
agreeing with Sargsyan in Yerevan", political scientist Vafa Guluzade
said commenting on the upcoming visit of the Turkish deputy FM to Baku.

"The new roadmap may indicate the terms of opening borders between
Turkey and Armenia and the issue of Karabakh will be indicated between
the lines.

However, Armenians will act skillfully, they will gain the opening
of borders but protract the liberation of occupied lands. Armenians
should first liberate lands. Otherwise, they will again use lie and
the issue of Karabakh will remain unsettled. Baku needs to explain
to Ankara that it should act like this while negotiating with Armenia.

Otherwise, the Karabakh issue will remain unsettled during the
Turkish-Armenian rapprochement", he said.

Barack Obama Will Meet Tayyip Erdogan In Washington

BARACK OBAMA WILL MEET TAYYIP ERDOGAN IN WASHINGTON

Tert.am
12:47 09.04.10

US President Barack Obama and the Turkish Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Erdogan will hold a meeting in the sidelines of a World
Nuclear Security Summit to be held in Washington from April 12-13,
reports Turkish local news agency Anadolu.

To date it had been not clear whether or not Obama would meet Erdogan.

Turkish media reports that Erdogan will hold meetings in Washington
also with Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan, as well as with the
leaders of Russia, Brazil, Kazakhstan, China and Ukraine.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan and the Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu,
as well as the Turkish Energy Minister Taner Yildiz will leave for
Washington on April 11.

Davutoglu is expected also meet his American counterpart Hilary
Clinton.

Turkish local daily Radikal, in turn, reports that currently necessary
measures are being taken to prepare the Obama-Sargsyan-Erdogan
tripartite meeting in Washington.

Earlier the White House had said that no such meeting was planned.

Armenia, India Has Unfulfilled Potential

ARMENIA, INDIA HAS UNFULFILLED POTENTIAL

PanARMENIAN.Net
April 9, 2010 – 13:46 AMT 08:46 GMT

Armenia’s Ambassador to India Ara Hakobyan met with the Minister of
Commerce and Industry of India, Mr. Anand Sharma on April 7 to discuss
trade liberization, stimulation of mutual visits and investments as
well as establishment of joint ventures.

Appreciating friendly relations and high-level political dialogue
between the Armenia and India, the two men stressed the necessity of
collaboration within international organizations.

"The Armenian-Indian potential in still unfulfilled," Ambassador
Hakobyan said, RA MFA press office reported.

Komandos: Uncompatibility Of Two Principles Of International Law All

KOMANDOS: UNCOMPATIBILITY OF TWO PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW ALLOWS TO SAY ABOUT DEADLOCK IN KARABAKH SETTLEMENT

ArmInfo
2010-04-08 13:50:00

ArmInfo. The uncompatibility of the two principles of international law
(the right of people for self-determination and territorial integrity)
allows to say about deadlock in Karabakh settlement, the Karabakh
war hero, Arkadiy Ter-Tadevosyan (Komandos) told journalists today.

‘Unfortunately, there is no national ideology in Armenia to reach
national ideas. I cannot imagine how even one region may be returned
without getting no guarantee on security of the Karabakh people. I
do not understand all the talks about ceding of territories. I am
against it’, – he said.

When commenting on Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan’s statement made
in Syria, according to which Armenia is ready to return a part of
the territories in exchange for some compromises of Azerbaijan in
the matter of Nagornyy Karabakh status, Komandos said it does not
meet the real state of affairs.

Yerevan Hosts Armenian-Turkish Negotiations

YEREVAN HOSTS ARMENIAN-TURKISH NEGOTIATIONS

PanARMENIAN.Net –
April 7, 2010 – 17:38 AMT 12:38 GMT

Armenian Minister of Foreign Affairs Edward Nalbandian received Special
Envoy of the Turkish Prime Minister and Turkish Deputy Minister of
Foreign Affairs Feridun Sinirlioglu, who arrived in Yerevan on April
7. Normalization of Armenian-Turkish relations was in the focus
of discussion.

The Armenian Minister confirmed the international community’s position,
which states that Armenian-Turkish normalization and ratification of
Protocols should take place without preconditions. Mr.

Nalbandian noted that efficient steps are expected from Turkey,
RA MFA press office reported.

Harout Sassounian: Ankara Will Ratify Protocols If Armenia Compromis

HAROUT SASSOUNIAN: ANKARA WILL RATIFY PROTOCOLS IF ARMENIA COMPROMISES OVER KARABAKH

PanARMENIAN.Net –
April 6, 2010 – 13:06 AMT 08:06 GMT

Turkey will sign the protocols on normalization of relations with
Armenia immediately if the latter compromises over Karabakh, ceding
the security area, said Harout Sassounian, the publisher of The
California Courier.

"Turks were never interested in opening of the border and establishment
of diplomatic relations. They use the protocols to gain concessions on
Karabakh and Genocide issues from Armenia. No step towards ratification
was made, with the protocols being in the parliament for over six
months," he told a PanARMENIAN.Net reporter.

As to international recognition of the Armenian Genocide, Mr.

Sassounian said that the protocols hinder the process. "This year,
the Armenian Genocide resolution scraped through the U.S. House
Committee on Foreign Affairs due to one extra vote in favor. The same
happened in the Swedish parliament. 7 years ago, a similar resolution
was passed by the House panel with a vote 40 to 7," he said.

Alexander Manasyan: Changes Depend On Turkey

ALEXANDER MANASYAN: CHANGES DEPEND ON TURKEY

Aysor
April 6 2010
Armenia

"No cardinal changes should be expected in the Armenian – Turkish
relations, until Turkey recognizes its disposition about the Armenian
Genocide," said political scientist Alexander Manasyan speaking about
Sargsyan – Erdogna – Obama meeting in Washington.

According to the speaker the denial of the Armenian Genocide by Turkey
means that that country remains criminal by its psychology and policy,
though there is a struggle inside the country by the forces that are
ready to accept the fact of Genocide.

Alexander Manasyan believes that even if Armenia will not raise the
problem of Genocide recognition through its political means it will
remain in the schedule of discussions of the international community.

The political scientist thinks that the results of RA President
Sargsyan’s visit are based on the US disposition towards Turkey and
how much changes can be done by Ankara, the Genocide recognition in
that number.

International Federation For Human Rights Forum In Yerevan April 6-8

INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS FORUM IN YEREVAN APRIL 6-8

Tert.am

Shirin Ebadi, Luis Moreno Ocampo, Abdou Diouf, Francoise Tulkens:
these are a few names among the list of key personalities and renowned
national and international experts participating in the International
Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) Forum alongside human rights
defenders from the 155 FIDH member organizations throughout the world.

This forum, entitled "JUSTICE: New Challenges – the Right to an
Effective Remedy before an Independent Tribunal," will take place in
Yerevan from April 6-8, 2010, according to the media page on the FIDH
official website.

"This forum will represent a unique opportunity for debate and exchange
of experiences and analysis relating to the fight against impunity,
access to justice for victims of human rights violations and prevention
of the most serious crimes," declared FIDH President Souhayr Belhassen.

"Bringing together so many personalities around this issue shortly
before the commemoration of the first genocide of the 20th century,
takes on a strong symbolic importance in our eyes, in particular
in the context of continued dialogue between Turkey and Armenia,"
she explained.

This forum, organized in partnership with the Civil Society Institute
(CSI), FIDH member organization in Armenia, within the framework
of the 37th FIDH Congress, will indeed constitute an opportunity to
work on the different remedies available to victims of human rights
violations in the course of their struggle for truth, justice and
reparations on a national, regional and international level, and
to look into the issue of the prevention of international crimes,
on the basis of the exchange of experiences between participating
NGOs from every continent.

ARF-D’s Appeal To Constitutional Court Incomprehensible: Hrayr Tovma

ARF-D’S APPEAL TO CONSTITUTIONAL COURT INCOMPREHENSIBLE: HRAYR TOVMASYAN

Tert.am

"The National Assembly’s powers are defined by Article 62 of the RA
Constitution. It means that the National Assembly cannot be given any
other powers by any other acts," lawyer Hrayr Tovmasyan told Tert.am,
commenting on a proposal by the Armenian Revolutionary Federation
(Dashnaktsutyun, ARF-D) to give the National Assembly the right to
ratify international treaties with reservations.

With 4 "no" votes by the Republican Party of Armenia and the Prosperous
Armenia Party and an abstain vote by an independent deputy, the
ARF-D move had earlier been turned down at the NA Standing Committee
on Foreign Relations. Now the ARF-D intends to appeal to the RA
Constitutional Court with an aim to discuss whether this disputable
provision is constitutional or not.

Tovmasyan, upon Tert.am’s request to comment on ARF-D’s initiative,
said that he was not familiar with the above-mentioned proposal,
adding that, since there was no such law or ruling had been made,
it’s incomprehensible the constitutionality of which act should the
Constitutional Court resolve.

He also said that according to Article 85 of the RA Constitution,
it is the government, along with the president, who develops and
implements the country’s foreign policy.

In Syria, a Prologue for Cities

.html?pagewanted=all

By JOHN NOBLE WILFORD
Published: April 5, 2010

Archaeologists have embarked on excavations in northern Syria expected
to widen and deepen understanding of a prehistoric culture in
Mesopotamia that set the stage for the rise of the world’s first
cities and states and the invention of writing.

In two seasons of preliminary surveying and digging at the site known
as Tell Zeidan, American and Syrian investigators have already
uncovered a tantalizing sampling of artifacts from what had been a
robust pre-urban settlement on the upper Euphrates River. People
occupied the site for two millenniums, until 4000 B.C. – a
little-known but fateful period of human cultural evolution.

Scholars of antiquity say that Zeidan should reveal insights into life
in a time called the Ubaid period, 5500 to 4000 B.C. In those poorly
studied centuries, irrigation agriculture became widespread,
long-distance trade grew in influence socially and economically,
powerful political leaders came to the fore and communities gradually
divided into social classes of wealthy elites and poorer commoners.

Gil Stein, director of the Oriental Institute of the University of
Chicago, a leader of the excavations at Zeidan, said the site’s
northern location promised to enrich knowledge of the Ubaid culture’s
influence far from where the first urban centers eventually flourished
in the lower Tigris and Euphrates Valley. The new explorations, he
said, are planned to be the most comprehensive yet at a large Ubaid
settlement, possibly yielding discoveries for decades.

`I figure I’m going to be working there till I retire,’ said Dr.
Stein, who is 54.

There are several reasons for excitement over the Zeidan excavations.
Warfare and ensuing unstable conditions have locked archaeologists out
of Iraq and its prime sites of Mesopotamian antiquity. So they have
redoubled research in the upper river valleys, across the border in
Syria and southern Turkey. And Zeidan is readily accessible. Having
never been built upon by subsequent cultures, it is free of any
overburden of ruins to thwart excavators.

Above all, a driving ambition of archaeologists always is to dig
beneath the known past for more than glimpses of the little known.

For almost two centuries, the glory went to expeditions unearthing the
houses and temples, granaries and workshops of earliest urban centers
like Uruk, seat of the legendary Gilgamesh, and the later splendors of
Ur and Nineveh. The challenge was to decipher the clay tablets of a
literate civilization with beginnings in what is known as the Uruk
period, 4000 to 3200 B.C.

Uruk remains overshadowed the traces of Ubaid cultures, the region’s
earliest known complex society. Only a handful of ruins – at Ubaid,
Eridu and Oueili in southern Mesopotamia and Tepe Gawra, in the north
near Mosul, Iraq – had produced at best a sketchy picture of these
older cultures. A few Ubaid sites in northern Syria were either too
small to be revealing or virtually inaccessible under other ruins.

A decade ago, Richard L. Zettler, a University of Pennsylvania
archaeologist with extensive experience in Syria, said, `Our real
focus now should not be on the Uruk period, but the Ubaid.’

Last week, Dr. Zettler, who is not associated with the Chicago team
but has visited the site, said that Zeidan preserves artifacts over a
long sequence of Ubaid culture at a junction of major trade routes.
`We should see the transition as the Ubaid spread from the south up to
farming regions in the north,’ he said.

Guillermo Algaze, an anthropologist at the University of California,
San Diego, and an authority on early urbanism in the Middle East not
involved in new research, said recently that Zeidan `has the potential
to revolutionize current interpretations of how civilization in the
Near East came about.’

Tell Zeidan is a two-hour drive southeast of Aleppo and three miles
from the modern town of Raqqa. Muhammad Sarhan, a curator of the Raqqa
Museum, is co-director, with Dr. Stein, of the excavations, formally
known as the Joint Syrian-American Archaeological Research Project at
Tell Zeidan.

The site consists of three large mounds on the east bank of the Balikh
River, just north of its confluence with the Euphrates. The mounds,
the tallest being 50 feet high, enclose ruins of a lower town. Buried
remains and a scattering of ceramics on the surface extend over an
area of 31 acres, which makes this probably larger than any other
known Ubaid community.

It would seem that the mounds had long stood on the semi-arid
landscape as an open invitation for archaeologists to stop and dig. A
few stopped. The American archaeologist William F. Albright identified
the place in 1926. The British archaeologist Sir Max Mallowan, husband
of the mystery writer Agatha Christie, was intrigued and made a brief
survey in the 1930s. A Dutch team led by Maurits van Loon took an
interest in 1983, finding that the site appeared to date to the Ubaid
period. A German group asked the Syrians for permission to excavate
but was turned down.

Finally, after initial visits to Zeidan, Dr. Stein said the Syrian
government `encouraged me to submit an application’ to dig. Why the
change?

`I was incredibly thrilled, but can only speculate on what their
reasons were,’ Dr. Stein said in a recent interview, referring to the
Syrian decision. `Perhaps they were waiting for the right team to come
along. Our institute had worked in Syria for something like 80 years,
and we were interested in a long-term commitment. We also pointed out
that the site was endangered from agricultural development along its
edges. Parts of the site had already been bulldozed for fields and a
canal.’

In the summers of 2008 and 2009, Dr. Stein directed mapping of the
Zeidan ruins and digging exploratory trenches. He said the initial
findings confirmed this to be a `proto-urban community’ in the Ubaid
period, most likely the site of a prominent temple.

A description and interpretation of the discoveries so far was
published in the Oriental Institute’s recent annual report, followed
by an announcement this week by the University of Chicago. The
international excavation team, supported by the National Science
Foundation in the United States, is to resume fieldwork in July.

Four distinct phases of occupation have been identified at Zeidan. A
simpler culture known as the Halaf is found in the bottom sediments,
well-preserved Ubaid material in the middle and two layers of late
Copper Age remains on top. From the evidence so far, the transitions
between periods seemed to have been peaceful.

Archaeologists have turned up remains of house floors with hearths,
fragments of mudbrick house walls, painted Ubaid pottery and sections
of larger walls, possibly part of fortifications or monumental public
architecture. The ceramic styles and radiocarbon tests date the wall
to about 5000 B.C.

One of the most telling finds was a stone seal depicting a deer,
presumably used to stamp a mark on goods to identify ownership in a
time before writing. About 2-by 2- 1/2 inches, the seal is unusually
large and carved from a red stone not native to the area. In fact,
archaeologists said, it was similar in design to a seal found 185
miles to the east, at Tepe Gawra, near Mosul.

To archaeologists, a seal is not just a seal. Dr. Zettler said it
signifies that `somebody has the authority to restrict access to
things – to close and seal jars, bags, doors – and so once you have
these seals you must have had social stratification.’

The existence of elaborate seals with near-identical motifs at such
widely distant sites, Dr. Stein said, `suggests that in this period,
high-ranking elites were assuming leadership positions across a very
broad region, and those dispersed elites shared a common set of
symbols and perhaps even a common ideology of superior social status.’

Other artifacts attest to the culture’s shift from self-sufficient
village life to specialized craft production dependent on trade and
capable of acquiring luxury goods, the archaeologists reported. Such a
transition is assumed to have required some administrative structure
and produced a wealthy class. The expedition will be searching for
remains of temples and imposing public buildings as confirmation of
these political and social changes.

In what appears to be the site’s industrial area, archaeologists
uncovered eight large kilns for firing pottery, one of the most
ubiquitous Ubaid commodities over wide trading areas. They found
blades made from the high-quality volcanic glass obsidian. An
abundance of obsidian chips showed that the blades were produced at
the site, and the material’s color and chemical composition indicated
that it came from mines in what is now Turkey.

`We found flint sickle blades everywhere,’ Dr. Stein said, noting that
they had a glossy sheen `where they had been polished by the silica in
the stems of wheat that they were used to harvest.’

Zeidan also had a smelting industry for making copper tools, the most
advanced technology of the fifth millennium B.C. The people presumably
reached as far as 250 miles away to trade for the nearest copper ore,
at sources around modern-day Diyarbakir, Turkey. Getting the ore home
was no easy task. In a time before the wheel or domesticated donkeys,
people had to bear the heavy burden on their backs.

A site like Tell Zeidan, Dr. Zettler said, is `telling us that the
Uruk cities didn’t come out of nowhere, they evolved from foundations
laid in the Ubaid period.’

Until recently, Dr. Algaze said, `accidents of data recovery’ had led
scholars to think the origin of cities and states in Mesopotamia was
`a fairly abrupt occurrence in the fourth millennium that as
concentrated in what is southern Iraq.’

The southern cities may have been larger and more enduring, he said,
but increasing exploration on the Mesopotamian periphery, especially
the spread of trade and technology among interacting Ubaid cultures,
suggests that `the seed of urban civilization’ had been planted well
before 4000 B.C.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/06/science/06archeo