BAKU: Black Sea Summit Opens In Bucharest

BLACK SEA SUMMIT OPENS IN BUCHAREST

Today, Azerbaijan
June 5 2006

A summit of Black Sea states opened in Bucharest today.

The presidents of Romania, Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia, and
Azerbaijan will explore setting up new energy routes to ensure supply
stability between Central Asia and Europe.

The EU wants to diversify energy supplies after a pricing dispute
between Ukraine and Russia cut supplies to Europe in January.

Also on the agenda are talks about the dispute between Armenia and
Azerbaijan over the territory of Nagorno Karabakh. The enclave is
an internationally recognized part of Azerbaijan but under de facto
control of ethnic Armenian separatists.

Officials attending today’s summit in the Romanian capital include
Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko, Moldovan President Vladimir
Voronin, Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili, Armenian Robert
Kocharian, and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev.

NKR MOD: Azeri Media Reports Cannot Be Taken Seriously

PanARMENIAN.Net

NKR MOD: Azeri Media Reports Cannot Be Taken Seriously

02.06.2006 17:49 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ `If Armenians wished to eliminate and plunder Azeri
villages they would have done it 13 years ago,’ head of the press
office of the NKR Ministry of Defense, lieutenant colonel Senor
Asratyan told a PanARMENIAN.Net reporter. He said Azeris themselves
demolished the houses while retreating in 1993. `It is an awkward
propaganda campaign that had nothing in common with the reality. It
cannot be taken seriously,’ Asratyan underscored.

To note, Azeri press news agency has spread information that
`Armenians started setting fire to the houses in the seized villages
of Yusifjanly, Novruzlu, Baghmanlar, Sarijalu and Saybaly of the
Aghdam region of Azerbaijan.’

Charitable Action

Panorama.am

19:31 03/06/06

CHARITABLE ACTION

The Charitable action on collection of the financial means for
rendering help to refugee children is organized by UN High
Commissioner for Refugee Branch Office in Armenia (UNHCR) with
information support of the Armenian PR Association (APRA). The Action
is being organized in celebration of June 20 – a World Refugee Day
-which is observed all over the world every year on initiative of UN
Secretary – General.

There are a number of other events and actions aimed at attracting
attention of Armenian public to the problems of the socially
vulnerable layers of society.

Postery, photographies and information messages, calling public to
take part in fund raising campaign are placed in the Internet (
through the and
forums). Number of commercial and international organizations have
already expressed their readiness to participate in the campaign All
the resources, gathered due to the action, will be directed to
financing of children’s vacation in Summer Camp
Tsitsernak./Panorama.am/

http://forum.armkb.com
www.openarmenia.com

ANKARA: Netherland NA faces bill criminalizing rejection of Genocide

Turkish Press
June 2 2006

Press Review

TURKIYE

NETHERLANDS PARLIAMENT FACES BILL CRIMINALIZING REJECTION OF ARMENIAN
`GENOCIDE’

Following France and Belgium, the Netherlands’ Parliament is also set
to consider a bill which would criminalize rejection of the so-called
Armenian genocide. The proposal was prepared by the Christian Unity
Party represented by three deputies in the 150-seat Parliament.
Meanwhile, a bill regarding pro-Armenia Belgium’s genocide in Congo
has been presented to Britain’s Parliament. The bill, initiated by
the efforts of a joint British-Turkish platform, calls on the Belgian
government to face its massacre in Congo in 1885-1908 and apologize
to the Congolese people./Turkiye/

EU Could Assume Caucasus Peacekeeping Role

EU COULD ASSUME CAUCASUS PEACEKEEPING ROLE
By Thomas de Waal in London for IWPR

ISN, Switzerland
May 31 2006

The European Union’s new special representative for the South Caucasus
sees an enhanced role for the EU in conflict resolution.

The new European Union special representative for the Caucasus, Peter
Semneby, has suggested that the EU could in future lead a peacekeeping
mission if a solution to the Nagorny Karabakh dispute is found.

Semneby, a Swedish diplomat who has just taken up the post, said in
an interview with IWPR in London last week that he wants to use his
mandate to work on the region’s unresolved conflicts.

“It’s no surprise that the main priority of my work is to engage as
far as possible with conflict resolution,” he said.

Semneby emphasized that the European Union has no formal role in the
detailed negotiations over Abkhazia – where the United Nations plays
a mediating role – and in South Ossetia and Nagorny Karabakh, where
that role is played by the Organisation for Security and Cooperation
in Europe (OSCE).

However, the idea of an international peacekeeping force is known to
be under discussion in the current Karabakh talks, and should there
be a breakthrough, an international body will be asked to lead it.

This is where the EU could step in.

“We will be expected to make a major contribution when a solution
is found, and we are looking into the possibilities we have, both in
terms of post-conflict rehabilitation and also – if the parties should
so desire – in terms of contributing peacekeepers. And possibly even
leading a peacekeeping operation,” said Semneby. “I should mention
that this is very hypothetical at this stage. This is only one of
several options, but it’s one that is being considered.”

A recent report by the International Crisis Group entitled “Conflict
Resolution in the South Caucasus: The EU’s Role” was scathing about
the low profile the European Union has adopted on conflict resolution
in the Caucasus until now.

“[The EU] does not participate directly in negotiations on Nagorny
Karabakh, Abkhazia or South Ossetia,” said the report, published in
March. “In and around Nagorny Karabakh, it has done little for conflict
resolution. It has rarely raised the South Caucasus conflicts in its
high-level discussions with partners and has employed few sanctions
or incentives to advance peace.”

A subtle change in language in the mandate assigned to Semneby,
compared with that of his predecessor Heikki Talvitie, means the EU
special representative is no longer asked to “assist the resolution
of conflicts” but to “contribute to the resolution of conflicts”.

Semneby said this linguistic change was small but important, calling it
“a political signal that the conflicts are very high on the agenda”.

The post of special representative was established in 2003 and has
a broad mandate -but a small budget. Acknowledging that it would
be impossible to “engage across the board”, Semneby identified his
major priorities as contributing to peace processes and supporting
state-building in the region, through initiatives such as judicial
reform.

Semneby, 46, has spent most of his career in Eastern Europe. As a
Swedish diplomat he visited the Armenian earthquake zone in 1988,
and he was a member of the first OSCE mission in Georgia in 1992. He
also served as the last OSCE ambassador to Latvia and more recently was
the organization’s ambassador in Croatia – another post he says gives
him the right experience to engage with the conflict-riven Caucasus.

He confessed to a feeling of “deja vu” in returning to the region
after a long gap, “This is the most disappointing aspect of coming
back to the Caucasus after so many years. Of course there have been
changes for the better as well. But the conflicts are such an obstacle
to the normal development of societies in the Caucasus.”

Semneby will be called upon to tackle the image problem the EU has
in the region, with lower visibility than the United States.

The special representative has to talk on behalf of 25 countries,
many of which have their own individual interests in the region. He
acknowledged that the failure to adopt an EU constitution, which
would have led to the development of a more coherent foreign policy,
had made his job harder.

However, with Bulgaria and Romania set to join the EU next year and
Turkey beginning membership talks, the South Caucasus will inevitably
begin to figure larger in Brussels.

Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia are all members of the EU’s European
Neighbourhood Policy, a development that Semneby said was deepening
their relationship with Brussels and would also entitle them to
increased aid. “We’re talking about hundreds of millions of euros
for each country. The EU will also step up its representation in the
countries, which will mean there will be a larger degree of visibility
in the South Caucasus.”

“I will also spend some time trying to explain to the public in the
South Caucasus what the EU is about. There is not a whole lot of
knowledge to begin with. To the extent that the EU is known, there
are still a lot of misunderstandings about what [it] is about.”

“I think there is also lack of knowledge in the EU about the south
Caucasus and its particular problems and about the importance of this
region for the EU, and if possible this is something I would like to
engage on.”

Asked about the hopes of many people in the region who dream of
joining the EU one day, the special representative was careful to
reiterate that the European Neighbourhood Policy “does not contain
a membership perspective”.

“It does mean that the countries can achieve a lot of the benefits
of EU membership by working on the implementation of the European
Neighbourhood Policy,” he went on.

“There is a problem – and I am the first to admit that – that since the
membership perspective is not there as a big carrot at the end, this
deprives us of one of the most powerful levers we had in encouraging
the countries of Central Europe to carry out painful reforms.”

This article originally appeared in Caucasus Reporting Service,
produced by the Institute for War and Peace Reporting (IWPR).

Caucasus Reporting Service is supported by the UK Foreign Office and
the US State Department.

Adoption of constitution is another step towards development

DeFacto Agency, Armenia
May 29 2006

ADOPTION OF CONSTITUTION IS ANOTHER STEP TOWARDS DEVELOPMENT

Interview with NKR Attorney General Armen Zalinian, the head of the
Task Force on NKR Constitution.
AA: “Mr. Zalinian, you have been working on the NKR Constitution bill
for over a year. In what stage are you now?” Armen Zalinian:
“Generally, the process of working out and adopting a constitution
defies hastiness. Every point requires a thorough consideration,
meaningful and tried approaches and tools. We are guided by these
principles, and considerable work has been done so far. The concept
of the NKR Constitution has been published, and currently the
constitutional committee is discussing the first two chapters, namely
the provisions on constitutional order and the basic human and civil
rights, freedoms and duties. It means that soon we are going to have
the main law of our country.” AA: “What are the basic tenets of the
NKR Constitution?” Armen Zalinian: “Those are reflected in the
concept. As a constitution of a sovereign, democratic, legal, social
state, in the NKR Constitution the right for self-determination
fulfilled by the people of Artsakh, promotion of democracy, rule of
law, human rights and freedoms, promotion of local governance,
establishment of a civil society will be set down. These are the main
components, upholding law and lawfulness between the society and the
state. The key idea of the Constitution is the following scheme: rule
of right through the law.” AA: “In the long run, how will Nagorno
Karabakh benefit from the adoption of the Constitution? After all,
the country has existed without a constitution for 15 years.” Armen
Zalinian: “A country’s constitution is the determinant and the result
of a people’s historical evolution. A constitution imbibes the spirit
of a people, its legal thought and heritage, established in the
course of centuries, the system of values, which guide the
aspirations of these people. The fact that Karabakh lived without a
constitution for years on is ordinary from the standpoint that a
newly established country is unable to adopt a constitution in a
short period of time. It is necessary to have experience in state
building and a choice of guidelines. Besides, the people of NKR were
forced into a war and then had to overcome the hardships of this war
in the legal, social and economic, spiritual and cultural and, why
not, home political spheres. Over the past 15 years a tangible
experience in state building has been accumulated, which is a
sufficient ground for having our own constitution.” AA: “Is the NKR
Constitution going to be a copy of the Constitution of the Republic
of Armenian in terms of contents and form?” Armen Zalinian: “The NKR
Constitution will be a constitution of a sovereign, democratic,
legal, social state with semi-presidential governance. It will be
consistent with the tendencies and demands of development of
constitutionalism in the world. And the reality determined by the
necessity of strengthening our independent statehood will certainly
be taken into consideration. The necessary tools have been worked
out. In this context, the constitutional experience of the Republic
of Armenia, the logic and philosophy of the constitutional reform are
very important. Several provisions introduced in the renewed
Constitution of Armenia will be used in our Constitution. The
constitutional experience of other countries is also taken into
consideration. In other words, we pick up everything that is
positive, everything that proved successful.” AA: “What will be the
procedure of adopting the Constitution?” Armen Zalinian: “Naturally,
a referendum. I believe that our people will vote to the referendum
on the Constitution, because the adoption of the Constitution will be
another important step towards the establishment and strengthening of
our republic.”
SVETLANA KHACHATRIAN.

89 Servicemen Died

89 SERVICEMEN DIED

Lragir.am
26 May 06

The Ministry of Defense reports that in 2005 89 servicemen dies in
Armenia. On May 24 Avetik Ishkanyan, the chair of the Helsinki
Committee of Armenia, reported these data during the debate on the
annual report of Human Rights Watch. `47 were sergeants, 24 officers,
5 warrant officers and 13 contractors,’ said Avetik Ishkanyan. He
mentioned that 15 were killed at the Armenian-Azerbaijani front line.
According to Ishkanyan, the suggestion that servicemen in the Armenian
army die because of relations that breech the army regulations is
true.

Bush replacing envoy to Armenia amid controversy

Bush replacing envoy to Armenia amid controversy

AP Worldstream; May 25, 2006

President George W. Bush is replacing the U.S. ambassador to Armenia,
who apparently misrepresented U.S. policy by classifying as “genocide”
deaths of large numbers of Armenians at Turkish hands in 1915.

The White House nominated Richard Hoagland, a career diplomat who
currently is ambassador to Tajikistan, to replace Ambassador John
Evans in Yerevan. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack did not
acknowledge that Evans’ comment about genocide was a contributing
factor to his replacement. McCormack, speaking to reporters, praised
Evans for what he said was a long and distinguished career in the
Foreign Service.

Earlier this week, 60 members of Congress sent a letter to Secretary
of State Condoleezza Rice expressing concern that Evans was being
withdrawn as a result of his February 2005 comment declaring that “the
Armenian Genocide was the first genocide of the twentieth century.”

Rep. Ed Markey expressed hope that the “sudden action” by the
administration in withdrawing Evans was unrelated to the envoy’s
comments.

Evans received a “constructive dissent award” from the union of career
diplomats last year for the independent stand he took on the genocide
issue while speaking to an Armenian group in California.

The group later withdrew the award, the Washington Post said, on
grounds that Evans did not meet the selection criteria.

Following complaints from Turkey, Evans amended his remarks to say the
events of 1915 represented an “Armenian tragedy” but not a genocide,
the newspaper said.

It reported that Evans said he had used the term “genocide” in his
“personal capacity” during “informal meetings,” and “this was
inappropriate.”

Turkey vehemently denies that it committed genocide against Armenians,
saying many were killed as the Ottoman Empire fell but it was not part
of an organized genocidal campaign.

Armenians say Turks knowingly massacred 1.5 million of their ancestors.

BAKU: Arbitrators’ Delegation Met With Armenian Foreign Minister

ARBITRATORS’ DELEGATION MET WITH ARMENIAN FOREIGN MINISTER
Author: À.Mamedov

TREND Information, Azerbaijan
May 25 2006

Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia Grigory Karasin, Assistant to US
Secretary of State Daniel Freed and cochairs of OSCE Minsk Group met
with Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan today in Yerevan.

Mediamax reports, the delegation is meeting with Armenia’s President
Robert Kocharyan at 400Pm local time.

US Embassy officials said upon the completion of this meeting the
arbitrators are performing with a statement in Mariott hotel.

–Boundary_(ID_zVlIv4duBVBT7BkVkADQqA)–

Armenian PM Heads To Dushanbe For CIS PMs’ Ministerial Meeting

ARMENIAN PM HEADS TO DUSHANBE FOR CIS PMS’ MINISTERIAL MEETING

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
May 25 2006

YEREVAN, May 25. /ARKA/. Armenian Prime Minister flew Wednesday
to Dushanbe to attend CIS prime ministerial meeting scheduled for
Thursday, Armenian Government press service reports.

The delegation is made up of the head of cabinet ministers staff
Manuk Topuzyan, Deputy Foreign Minister Gegham Gharibjanyan, Armenian
Representative in CIS Economic Commission Artak Vardanyan, Armenian
National Assembly members and other officials.

CIS countries cooperation in various areas will be discussed at the
meeting. A number of documents will be signed as part of the meeting.