Bayramov: Azerbaijan will file two more claims against Armenia in international arbitration

 NEWS.am 
Dec 27 2021

Azerbaijan will file two more claims against Armenia in international arbitration, Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov said.

"In 2021, interstate lawsuits between Azerbaijan and Armenia took place for the first time. Work in this direction has already begun, during this year Azerbaijan filed a lawsuit against Armenia to the European Court of Human Rights, at the same time, within the framework of the 1965 Convention on the Elimination of Any Forms of Racial Discrimination – to the UN International Court of Justice," Bayramov said.

Pashinyan Discusses ‘Difficult and Sensitive’ Armenia-Turkey Talks; Relations with Baku

Turkey-Armenia border

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan on Friday said unreasonable optimism should not be expressed over discussions and negotiations with Turkey and Azerbaijan, pledging Yerevan’s commitment to advance relations between Armenia’s neighbors.

“We are ready to pursue that path,” said Pashinyan during an online press conference on Friday night local time, when he responded to questions from reporters and representatives of non-governmental organizations. He said Yerevan’s participation in talks is meant to “create a basis for optimism.”

Armenia and Turkey have appointed special envoys who will engage in negotiations․ Armenia will be represented by the Deputy Parliament Speaker Ruben Rubinyan, and Turkey will be represented by Ankara’s former ambassador to the United States and notorious Armenian Genocide denier Serder Kilic.

Pashinyan said that a first meeting has not been scheduled yet. He expressed hope that the meeting will be scheduled as soon as possible. “A rather long process is expected, and one should not have exaggerated expectations from one or two meetings in order to record a concrete result,” said Pashinyan.

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Turkey has voiced preconditions for normalizing relations with Yerevan, among them calling on Armenia to recognize Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity that includes Artsakh, and more recently pressing for the creation of the so-called “Zangezur Corridor,” a plan advanced by Azerbaijan’s president Ilham Aliyev who seeks to create a route connecting Azerbaijan proper with Nakhichevan and Turkey through Armenia.

“Armenia has not discussed, does not discuss and will not discuss any corridor issue,” said Pashinyan.

As for relations with Turkey, he said, if building roads and opening transit routes will have greater regional significance, then the matter will be placed on Armenia’s agenda. “One of the issues, for example, might be the opening of the Armenian-Turkish border and the railway,” Pashinyan said, signaling his approval for opening air traffic between Turkey and Armenia—a point made last week by Turkey’s Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu.

“Our expectation is the normalization of relations [with Turkey], but we must understand that we are dealing with a complex problem, which has many nuances and sensitivities. There is a lot of emotional approaches to the issue in the Republic of Armenia,” said Pashinyan.

The prime minister explained that Armenia has always said that it is ready to normalize relations with Turkey without preconditions, which means, he said, that the recognition of the Armenian Genocide has never been a precondition for normalization of relations with Turkey and opening of borders. He added that the Armenian government has clearly stated its position on the issue of international recognition of the Genocide.

Pashinyan clarified that there is no agreement about a meeting with Erdogan. However, he said, if the negotiations between the envoys is successful “a high-level meeting can take place.”

On the issue of relations with Azerbaijan, Pashinyan said that Armenia is interested in negotiating a peace treaty, adding that such a document would be contingent of the comprehensive settlement of the Karabakh, which he explained the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs have proposed.

Saying that Armenia is open to talked and has not refused to negotiate, Pashinyan said this approach stems from his government’s plan for ushering in an era of peaceful development in the region.

“If we manage to formulate a model of peace that will be beneficial to both Armenia and Azerbaijan, then perhaps the negotiation process will have less conflict or opposition, and create an opportunity for understanding the other side’s point of view, come to some acceptable provisions from those points of view and to form some type of a new scheme,” said Pashinyan, adding that his talks with Aliyev in Sochi and Brussels focused on that approach.

According to Pashinyan, after Sochi, however, events took place that seriously called into question that conversation. Fortunately, no such events have taken place following the Brussels meeting.

To that end, however, Pashinyan said that if the security of cargo transportation through the territory of Azerbaijan is not ensured, cargo transportation will not be carried out.

“If in those conditions, suppose the Armenian cargo does not pass through the territory of Azerbaijan, the Azerbaijani cargo will not pass through the Armenian territory. Of course, this matter will be included on the agenda when we discuss these issues,” said Pashinyan.

Since the Brussels talks last week, the issue of opening the railway has been brought up by Armenian officials as part of a larger discussion of opening transit links with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan said on Friday that Armenia will never agree to provide a road to Azerbaijan without customs duty or inspections.

“Before the Brussels meeting, I had already outlined the red lines for the Armenian side on my Facebook page, according to which we do not accept any corridor-related proposal, and what we talked about and agreed to regarding the railway in Brussels, was a summation of the Sochi talks and what we registered there is that customs and border control will operate from both sides, which is acceptable for us, is acceptable for Azerbaijan and we agreed to launch the construction of the railway,” explained Pashinyan.

However, following the talks in Sochi, Aliyev demanded that his proposed “Zangezur Corridor” have the same status as the Lachin Corridor currently has.

Pashinyan explained that during his talks with Aliyev in Brussels he saw opportunities for reaching agreements on some practical issues with Azerbaijan. He emphasized, however, no agreement has been reached on the opening of transport links.

He also addressed the one-on-one meeting he had with Aliyev, which was announced by Michel, the European leader, who told reporters that he left Pashinyan and Aliyev alone to have a private conversation.

Pashinyan told reporters on Friday that the 20 to 30 minuted meeting with Aliyev focused on the same topics that were earlier discussed during the talks mediated by Michel.

Only FlyOne Armenia applies for permission to carry out Yerevan-Istanbul charter flights

Save

Share

 17:41,

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 24, ARMENPRESS. The Civil Aviation Committee of Armenia has received only one application so far for a permission to operate Yerevan-Istanbul charter flights, spokesperson of the Ministry of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure Sona Harutyunyan told ARMENBPRESS.

“On December 23, one application was received from FlyOne Armenia for 3 charter flights. The application is currently being studied by the Civil Aviation Committee and will make a decision within a reasonable time, which will be published in the near future”, Harutyunyan said, adding that the criteria for the application is set by the Government.

Speaking with Zarkerak.am, Lilit Aghajanyan, Assistant to the Chairman of the Civil Aviation Committee, said that there are no restrictions for flights, as the airspace of Armenia is open for any flight from any country, and the airspace of Turkey is actually open for Armenia.

Head of the Advisory Board of FLYONE ARMENIA Aram Ananyan had said earlier that the airline applied not only to Armenian but also Turkish authorities for organizing the flights.




Russian Defense Minister: peacekeepers assist in rebuilding relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia

Vestnik Kavkaza
Dec 23 2021
 23 Dec in 10:20

Russian troops stationed in Syria and in Nagorno-Karabakh are a guarantee of preserving peace in these regions, Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu said on Wednesday.

"For over a year, Russian peacekeepers have been ensuring the conditions for facilitating a peaceful life in Nagorno-Karabakh and adjacent regions, assisting in rebuilding relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia. To date, no serious incidents have occurred. Also, the contingent of Russian troops remains the guarantor of peace in Syria," he said at a plenary session of the Defense Ministry’s Public Council.

For instance, he reported that since the beginning of the year, Russian servicemen in Syria have conducted 348 humanitarian events with over 650 tonnes of food products and basic necessities distributed.

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 12/22/2021

                                        Wednesday, 


Iran Reaffirms ‘Red Line’ On South Caucasus Borders


Armenia - Mahmoud Ahmadi-Bighash, a member of an Iranian parliamentary 
delegation visiting Armenia, at a meeting with Armenian lawmakers, Yerevan, 
.


Iran remains strongly opposed any redrawing of borders in the South Caucasus, an 
influential Iranian parliamentarian was reported to say during a visit to 
Armenia on Wednesday.

The conservative lawmaker, Mahmoud Ahmadi-Bighash, arrived in Yerevan earlier 
this week together with several other members of an Iranian parliamentary group 
promoting closer ties with Armenia.

They held a series of meetings with Armenian parliament deputies before being 
received by Armen Grigorian, the secretary of Armenia’s Security Council.

A statement released by the council cited Ahmadi-Bighash as saying that the 
region is very important to the Islamic Republic.

“In particular, he stressed that regional peace and stability and inviolability 
of the borders are the red lines for Iran and Tehran will not tolerate any 
territorial change in the region,” the statement said.

Other Iranian lawmakers as well as Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian 
made similar statements in early October amid Iran’s mounting tensions with 
Azerbaijan that followed Baku’s decision to levy hefty fees from Iranian trucks 
transporting goods to and from Armenia.

The vehicles use a road mostly passing through Armenia’s southeastern Syunik 
province which is sandwiched between Azerbaijan and its Nakhichevan exclave and 
also borders Iran. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev has repeatedly threatened 
to forcibly open a “corridor” to Nakhichevan, drawing strong condemnation from 
Armenia.

Mojtaba Zonnouri, a senior Iranian parliamentarian and cleric, accused Aliyev on 
October 3 of trying to “cut Iran’s access to Armenia” with the help of Turkey 
and Israel. Zonnouri was apparently among 165 members of Iran’s parliament who 
issued a joint statement warning against “any geopolitical change and alteration 
of the borders of neighbor countries.”

Armenia’s government regularly expresses readiness for conventional transport 
links with Azerbaijan. Grigorian told Ahmadi-Bighash and other visiting Iranian 
lawmakers that the Armenian government’s position “matches Iran’s foreign policy 
priorities.”

The tensions between Tehran and Baku have eased in recent weeks. 
Amir-Abdollahian visited the Azerbaijani capital on Wednesday.



Yerevan Mayor Slams Armenia’s Ruling Party Over His Ouster

        • Narine Ghalechian
        • Gayane Saribekian

Armenia - Yerevan Mayor Hayk Marutian leaves an emergency session of the 
municipal assembly before it approves a motion of no confidence in him, December 
22, 2021.


Yerevan Mayor Hayk Marutian accused Armenia’s political leaders of betraying the 
goals of the 2018 “velvet revolution” that brought them to power as he was 
ousted on Wednesday by the municipal assembly controlled by the ruling Civil 
Contract party.

He charged that Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and his political team have 
sought to stifle dissent and enrich themselves or their cronies instead of 
tackling poverty in the country.

Marutian voiced the allegations during a session of the city council that 
approved, by 44 votes to 10, a motion of no confidence in him tabled by the 
pro-government My Step bloc. The council also elected one of his deputies, 
Hrachya Sargsian, as Yerevan’s new mayor.

The bloc controlled by Civil Contract officially announced its decision to 
replace the mayor after meeting with Pashinian on Friday. It said Marutian quit 
Civil Contract in December 2020 and is not running the Armenian capital “with 
sufficient efficiency.”

The move followed months of growing friction between Pashinian and Marutian. The 
latter actively participated in the Pashinian-led mass protests that toppled 
Armenia’s former leader, Serzh Sarkisian, in May 2018. The protests were sparked 
by Sarkisian’s attempt to prolong his decade-long rule and fuelled by popular 
discontent with widespread corruption and injustice.

Speaking shortly before the vote of no confidence, Marutian accused the ruling 
political team of having “deviated from the revolution’s values.”

“I thought that a [true] revolutionary’s supreme goal must be to improve the 
lives of other people,” he said. “In reality, as soon as they came [to power] 
they started improving their own lives, despite the fact that the country’s 
poverty rate continued to hover at around 30 percent.”


Armenia -Armen Galjian, the leader of the pro-government majority in Yerevan's 
municipal council, votes for a motion of no confidence in Mayor Hayk Marutian, 
.

The former TV comedian singled out the Pashinian government’s “secret” decisions 
to sharply raise the salaries of ministers and other senior government 
officials. He claimed that during his tenure he routinely received phone calls 
from unnamed “various officials” asking for privileged treatment of their 
cronies doing business in Yerevan. He did not name any of them.

Marutian said this was a key reason for his subsequent rift with Pashinian. “I 
didn’t expect such phone calls when I was joining the team,” he said.

“And now these people are saying that Hayk deviated from the revolution,” he 
went on. “This is said by people who at this difficult moment for the country 
are buying cars worth $200,000 and spending a whole month justifying, together 
with the entire team, that decision.”

Marutian further alleged that Armenia’s “most high-ranking officials” have 
repeatedly pressured him to fire municipal employees criticizing the government 
on social media. “I said in response: ‘My dear friends, we did the revolution so 
that people are not fired and persecuted for their views like they were in the 
past,” he said.

Senior members of the municipal council loyal to Pashinian hit back at Marutian. 
One of them, Armen Galjian, rebuked the ousted mayor for not countering what he 
called opposition attempts to stage a “counterrevolution” after Armenia’s defeat 
in last year’s war with Azerbaijan.

“Where was the Yerevan mayor during the counterrevolution?” he said. “Was he 
locked down in his office with a mask on his face or busy preparing to leave the 
party?”


Armenia - Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian (L) and his My Step bloc's mayoral 
candidate Hayk Marutian attend an election campaign rally in Yerevan, 20 
September 2018.

Galjian also said that Marutian has never told council majority leaders about 
the privileged treatment allegedly sought by senior officials.

Armenian parliament deputies representing Pashinian’s party responded to the 
accusations with harsher criticism and personal insults. Parliament speaker Alen 
Simonian, whose new expensive limousine has raised eyebrows in the country, said 
Marutian is slandering the country’s leadership to “justify his treason and 
ineptness.”

“You must instead recall the names of your more than two dozen friends whom you 
have deceived and betrayed,” Simonian wrote on Facebook.

Pashinian himself has not publicly commented on the dramatic falling-out with 
his erstwhile political ally.

The prime minister had chosen Marutian to lead My Step’s list of candidates in 
the last municipal elections held in September 2018 and won by the 
pro-government bloc. Relations between the two men deteriorated after the 2020 
war over Nagorno-Karabakh. Marutian increasingly distanced himself from 
Pashinian’s team in the following months and pointedly declined to support it 
during snap parliamentary elections held in June.

Earlier this month, the Haykakan Zhamanak daily belonging to Pashinian’s family 
alleged that Marutian has defected to the Armenian opposition and even secretly 
met with former President Robert Kocharian. The mayor categorically denied that.


Armenia - New Yerevan Mayor Hrachya Sargsian addresses the municipal council, 
.

Marutian on Wednesday defended his track record and insisted that he is still 
supported by the majority of Yerevan residents.

Most of the residents randomly interviewed by RFE/RL’s Armenian Service in the 
streets praised him. Some condemned the ruling party’s decision to replace the 
mayor.

“I am very saddened by his removal from his post because he has delivered on 
everything that he promised during the election campaign,” said one middle-aged 
woman.

Others were unimpressed with Marutian’s three-year tenure. “What has changed [in 
Yerevan?] Not much,” said a young woman.

Virtually no respondents had ever heard about Hrachya Sargsian, Yerevan’s new 
mayor. Sargsian, 36, told reporters that he is “happy with Mr. Marutian’s work” 
and plans to “complete the programs that we launched in 2018.”



Russian Official Again Discusses Armenian-Azeri Transport Links In Yerevan

        • Sargis Harutyunyan

Armenia - Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexei Overchuk at a meeting with 
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian, Yerevan, November 5, 2021.


Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexei Overchuk discussed with Prime Minister 
Nikol Pashinian ongoing efforts to restore transport links between Armenia and 
Azerbaijan during a fresh visit to Yerevan on Wednesday.

The main official purpose of the visit was to attend a regular session of a 
Russian-Armenian intergovernmental commission on economic cooperation. Overchuk 
met with Pashinian ahead of the session.

Pashinian’s press office said the two men discussed Russian-Armenian economic 
ties as well as “prospects for restoring transport links in the South Caucasus 
region.” In particular, it said, they “exchanged views” on the work of a 
Russian-Armenian-Azerbaijani working group dealing with practical modalities of 
opening the Armenian-Azerbaijani border to passenger and cargo traffic.

The working group co-headed by Overchuk and his Armenian and Azerbaijani 
opposite numbers last met in Moscow on December 1. It had been expected to 
formalize relevant understandings reached by Pashinian and Azerbaijani President 
Ilham Aliyev at their November 26 talks in Sochi hosted by Russian President 
Vladimir Putin.

The group announced no deals on the transport links, however. Armenian Deputy 
Prime Minister Mher Grigorian’s office said its meeting will “resume” in the 
coming days.

The trilateral task force has not met again since then. Grigorian on Wednesday 
attributed the delay to unspecified “issues subject to expert evaluations.”

Aliyev and Pashinian met again in Brussels last week. Speaking just before those 
talks, Aliyev said Yerevan must not control a land “corridor” that would connect 
Azerbaijan to its Nakhichevan exclave via Armenia’s Syunik province. Pashinian 
rejected the demand.

During the ensuing talks, the two leaders appear to have failed to patch up 
their differences on the status of the Armenian section of the planned 
Azerbaijan-Nakhichevan highway. But they reported further progress towards 
establishing a rail link between Nakhichevan and the rest of Azerbaijan.

Echoing Pashinian’s statements made in Brussels, Grigorian insisted that Armenia 
will retain full control over a 45-kilometer section of the railway passing 
through its territory.

“It will function as an infrastructure facility under Armenia’s jurisdiction in 
a manner defined by the law,” he told journalists.

Overchuk refused to comment on the issue after the session of the 
Russian-Armenian commission. The Russian official visited Baku and met with 
Aliyev last week.


Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2021 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 

Arayik Harutyunyan takes part in the "Ethics and Innovation" ministerial round-table discussion

Save

Share

 19:10,

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 14, ARMENPRESS. Arayik Harutyunyan, the Chief of Staff of the Prime Minister, took part on December 14 in the "Ethics and Innovation” ministerial round-table discussion of the Eastern Partnership and Western Balkans countries, launched within the framework of the Global Summit of the Open Government Partnership (OGP). As ARMENPRESS was informed from the Office of the Prime Minister, issues related to the challenges of the pandemic and escalations were discussed during the event. How do countries cope with them and what reform agenda do they envisage in their OGP national action plans?

The round-table was attended by high-ranking representatives of Armenia, Georgia, Moldova, North Macedonia, Serbia, Ukraine, Montenegro, as well as representatives of the OGP, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, the European Commission, the Eastern Partnership and other civil society initiatives.




Scandalous statements of Armenian MP spark protests from parents of Armenian prisoners held in Azerbaijan


Dec 8 2021


    Yerevan

Parents of prisoners and missing servicemen who are still being held in Azerbaijan after the second Karabakh war are protesting again. Previously they were gathered at the building of the Armenian government demanding the return of their relatives but now they also demand an answer regarding the scandalous statements of the speaker of the parliament Alen Simonyan. In a secretly filmed video that circulated on social media, Simonyan said that “for him, these prisoners no longer exist”, these are the military who “threw down their weapons, fled and got lost, as a result of which they were captured”.

Parents of prisoners are outraged that, without trial and investigation, the speaker declared their sons deserters and criminals.

Residents of Armenia are monitoring the situation and actively discussing it on social media since the unresolved issue of the return of prisoners is painfully perceived by the whole society.


  • US Congress demands Azerbaijan to release all Armenian prisoners of war
  • Armenia files a lawsuit against Azerbaijan at International Court of Justice
  • Everything known about Armenian PoWs in Azerbaijan

The protest of the relatives of the prisoners of war resumed immediately when the video with the scandalous statements of Alena Simonyan appeared on social media. On the evening of December 7, they tried to block the streets intersecting with the main square of Yerevan, where the government building is located. They spent the night in front of the parliament building, and in the morning the protest continued there.

The protesters blocked Baghramyan Avenue, where the main entrance to the parliament building is located, as well as Demirchyan Street, where another entrance is. The police have already detained ten protesters.

The demand of the protesters: either the speaker meets 20 of them, or he must go out and talk with all the protesters. Parents of prisoners believe that the speaker should apologize and clarify his statement.

They want to understand whether this is the personal opinion of Alain Simonyan or he expressed the opinion of the authorities as a whole.

Earlier, the Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan also said that all prisoners should not be declared heroes and the circumstances of their capture should be investigated.

During the protest, the parents have repeatedly said that they agree that after the return of the prisoners an investigation should be carried out, and if the fact of desertion is proved, the perpetrators must be tried.

At the same time, they share what they know about their loved ones and the circumstances in which they find themselves. The protesters are sure that the speaker’s statements are unfair to them and, of course, they still insist on the urgent return of their children from Azerbaijan.

The speaker has not yet met with the protesters.

But on December 7, he already expressed indignation at the fact that people who introduced themselves as comrades-in-arms and like-minded people asked him to answer questions and filmed this conversation, although he asked them not to record it. In addition, he stated that the recording has been edited and his statements were taken out of context.

Political observer Hakob Badalyan commented on the situation, assessing the disseminated video as “a blow to the chairman of the National Assembly or the government in general” and “a blow to the Republic of Armenia as a whole”. The expert asks a rhetorical question of whether the distribution of this video is accidental in parallel with the attempt to put pressure on Armenia, which is now being undertaken by Azerbaijan.

“At the same time, this in no way justifies the“ talkativeness ”of the NA Speaker. Let this assessment not seem harsh, as it is quite mild. […] The Speaker of the Parliament should be very attentive to where he speaks, on what topic and what words he uses”, Hakob Badalyan said.

As for the meaning of Alena Simonyan’s statements, the expert believes that “state policy and state interests cannot be hostages of the prisoner issue”. In his opinion, their problems will not be resolved in this way; instead, new problems will appear for the country’s authorities pursuing state policy.

He admits that “the return of prisoners is an undeniable priority for us, but “not at the expense of security, as painful as it sounds”.

AW: The Female Faces of the Artsakh War

Would there be war in a woman’s world? How would men react to our decision to start a war? Would we have so many wars if women ran the world?

War is not a female story. The stories of wars are mainly about men’s heroism and losses. Stories and songs are dedicated to them. The courage, devotion and emotions of women are mostly overshadowed. Women, however, suffer terribly painful consequences of war: losing their sons, husbands, fathers and brothers – losing everything. Women also suffer, to some extent, from social insecurity, lack of access to education, sexual harassment, reproductive health issues and rights violations. 

On the morning of September 27, 2020, Azerbaijan, backed by Turkey, launched a large-scale war on the internationally unrecognized territory of Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh), targeting almost all civilian settlements and densely populated cities, including schools, kindergartens and hospitals. These were targeted by artillery and air strikes by Azerbaijan throughout the war – for almost the entire 44 days.

According to the Artsakh ombudsman’s report, 72 civilians, including 12 women, were killed. Seven of these women (including an underaged girl) were killed by long-range missile strikes, including rocket-propelled grenades, bombings and subversive gunfire. Five women were held in Azeri captivity and subjected to physical violence and torture. Three other women were killed on the battlefield. 

I spoke with eight women, aged 27 to 90, who served as volunteers or direct participants in the war. All of these interview subjects were asked the same question: what were the most haunting things you witnessed?

Angela Frangyan, 34  

Angela Frangyan is a documentary filmmaker who lives and works in Yerevan. On the first day of the war, she went to Karabakh to make a film about the war before its end. After the war, she filmed footage of the families of captured soldiers and civilians, many of whom are still struggling to get their relatives back from captivity in Azerbaijan. 

Angela Frangyan

“Sometimes when I am looking through my archival footage, I feel that there is nothing that I have seen in reality… Sometimes I worry a lot that what I felt and what I saw I haven’t been able to film…

I remember in the hospital one brother had to inform his father that the other brother who was with him in the battle has died…

I saw parents who were watching the videos of the POW that has been tortured, thinking that they can find their lost sons… I was really listening to him, when he was looking at the video and talking with other parents…

I remember the voices of the animals in the villages that were getting evacuated, and mostly I remember the silent faces of the mothers in the shelters…silently praying.”

Helen Hakobyan, 44 

Helen Hakobyan works as an economist and chief specialist in Martuni. When the war broke out, Hakobyan joined her husband (a physician) as a volunteer nurse to help him throughout the war. The city of Martuni is the most heavily devastated city in the war. 

Helen Hakobyan

“The hardest moment was seeing scorched and dismembered bodies of soldiers; the smell of death that surrounded them is the same smell that I can smell even when I am asleep. When my brother fell into an ambush, I did not share my feelings with anyone. When he finally escaped, I knelt on the ground and gathered my strength. 

You find strength and you don’t have a right to cry, because everybody looks at you. You don’t share the pain that’s deep in your soul with your husband, because you don’t want to weaken him by your weakness.

 The first horror I witnessed was when the second horrible bombing occurred on the first of October in Martuni, resulting in many casualties. It seemed to me that the soldier who was in front of me was alive, but they took him to the morgue. His body was dismembered; he looked at me one last time and then passed away. It is impossible to forget those eyes…”

Hasmik Arushanyan, 63

Hasmik Arushanyan is a history teacher who stayed in the shelter during the war with her friends and relatives. With their hearts pounding, they waited impatiently for word from the battlefield about their sons and brothers.

Hasmik Arushanyan

“When a phosphorus bomb was thrown in Isaac akhbyur, near Shushi, the forest caught on fire, and you could hear the pain and suffering of the animals: the bears roaring in agony and the wolves howling in torment. That moment was so hard for me. A day later we learned that my son’s combat vehicle was hit by a Bayraktar. For three days we had no news, but then finally he called.”

Isabel Dangourian, 40

Isabel Dangourian is a Syrian-Armenian refugee who has been living with her family in Stepanakert for eight years. During the war, she and her husband opened their Samra restaurant to all visitors. Dangourian would test positive for coronavirus, but she refused to go to Yerevan until her husband forced her to leave.

Isabel Dangourian

“The most touching thing was seeing a mother, under intense bombing, bid farewell to her own young son while whispering in his ear asking him to stay strong and wait for her return in Yerevan. And to be honest, it’s difficult to choose the most haunting or touching experience because [you] not only go through indescribable situations during war but also the consequences that come after it. Just when you thought there wouldn’t be anything else more extreme than you had witnessed, there comes another situation. For instance, lately, the stories that we have heard about people we know well were quite unbearable, and what’s worse is that there’s not much you can do about it other than accept it.”

Lara Sargsyan, 36

Lara Sargsyan is a member of the military from the city of Chartar. She served in Artsakh’s Defense Army for 12 years. During the war, she took part in the most crucial stages of war.

Lara Sargsyan

“The war is a disaster itself; within seconds everything changes inside you. What you considered important before, becomes meaningless from the first shot. In the most tense moments, you do not feel anything under the shells and missiles. You wait impatiently for the end of this nightmare. If you survive, you will continue what you have to do.

I have witnessed an elderly friend observing the demise of his junior comrade-in-arms by a missile explosion from a distance, but he does not want to believe it until the end; he keeps hoping to find him alive. Approaching under the shelling and finding the dead, he is not confused or scared, but on the contrary, he continues the fight more persistently. 

The most difficult moment during the war in my case was me hearing on the radio that the next attack would be on my brother’s positions, and I understood that these would be hard battles. I don’t even want my enemy to have that feeling. I could not do anything to help and I was just praying to God. I’m still haunted.

I prayed that at least the severely wounded would be saved, and if it is not possible, then that they would not suffer when dying.”

Lika Zakaryan, 27 

Lika Zakaryan is a journalist from Stepanakert. Throughout the war, she filed reports from the most heavily targeted areas in the region. She considers herself a child of war and kept a diary, sharing her feelings as an eyewitness.

Lika Zakaryan

“The war made us experience a lot, but I will never forget one thing. Once, we visited one of the basement shelters in Stepanakert and met many people. It was the basement with a handful of children still in Stepanakert, children who were still in Artsakh. 

A woman, Elmira, was making tanav – a national Armenian soup. She served us all. We drank the hot tanav we missed and we talked. She told the stories of all the people living in the basement, who have children, brothers, friends and relatives on the frontline. At the very end of the basement, a man was sitting in front of the TV, his head hanging down, but still focused on the TV. 

And a little farther, a woman was sitting. ‘Her son has been living in Russia for seven years,’ said Elmira. ‘Who told you to come back?’ ‘Is he back?’ I asked. ‘Yes. The next day of the war he was already in Stepanakert. His parents had not seen him for seven years. He entered the house, kissed his mother and father and said that he was going to war. That was the way he went’ ․․․ ‘Is there no news?’ ‘No.’ And the father and mother, who lived in the distant shadow of their son, are sitting everyday waiting for the news. At the same time, they read all the names on TV, fearing that his name may be on that list․․․ At that very moment they heard… They heard the name of their son, which came out from the TV… Not to see your child for seven years, send him for a better life and get his name in the list of dead… I will never forget their cries…”

Nune Arakelyan, 50

Nune Arakelyan is a lecturer of Russian language and literature at Artsakh State University. She could not leave her only son and other relatives on the battlefield and leave Artsakh, so she remained in the shelter during the war, taking care of the elderly who were forcibly displaced from their villages.

“Old people were brought to our basement from the villages in which the fighting was going on. I will not forget this old woman whose son had been martyred in the last war; her grandchildren were participating in this war, and she was so brave. She did not lose her heart; instead she consoled and encouraged everyone.

When I was working as a volunteer in a hotel, I saw an elderly lady there. She was a professor at the university. She said that she came to Artsakh to help, to be useful. But the most touching thing was when my son called from the front. I screamed in hysteria that I will go to him myself and bring him home for at least one day. And he replied that if I dare do it his fellow soldiers would lose respect for him, and he would lose respect for himself and for me.”

Kima Gabrielyan, 90 

Kima Gabrielyan is a violinist who moved from Yerevan to live in Shushi (now under Azerbaijani control).

Kima Gabrielyan

She worked at the Stepanakert Music School as a violin teacher. After leaving her home and her son’s grave under enemy control, she now lives in a Stepanakert nursing home. Hundreds of forcibly displaced families live here. Even at this age, she continues to play the violin to teach displaced children.

“I was shocked by the loss of an entire generation, that so many young people were killed. All of them were 18 to 20 years old.

A whole generation is gone. What will we do? We waited 20 to 25 years, raised these children and lost a whole generation. I cried a lot. Although I am 90 years old, I could see perfectly, but this pain blinded me… I’m not a politician to answer the question of whether the land or the victims. Maybe they should have thought. I am not saying to give everything to the Turks; I am not saying this. We have dignity, we are Armenians and we must defend our land, but if such a choice was made, we must think. Where is our future when young people who are to create this future are killed? What are we going to do now? I don’t know…

And now I am disturbed by the thought that I left my son’s grave in Shushi. On the last day when Shushi was handed over, I was kneeling at my son’s grave in Shushi when our soldiers hugged me and took me away from it, put me in a car and drove away. And now my only wish is to go and get a handful of soil from my son’s grave.”

These women still live in Artsakh. Their lives, however, have transformed from one wartime period to another, where uncertainty steals their dreams. Surviving three wars and always expecting another one, the only thing they want is peace. At the same time, most of them are ready to take a gun and defend their motherland. They realize that they are to bear the burden of defeat, encourage their husbands, sons and the ones they love with their wisdom and charisma. These women had the courage to give birth and bring new lives into this world under the terrifying sounds of explosions. They are the powerful key in educating generations, who will live and reanimate the land.

Siranush Sargsyan is a historian and political scientist. She's earned her degrees from Artsakh State University and the Public Administration Academy of the Republic of Armenia. Her master thesis focused on the issues surrounding the development of the party system in Nagorno-Karabakh. She's taught history in a village in Martuni and has served as the chief specialist of the Republic of Artsakh National Assembly in the Standing Committee on Science, Education, Culture, Youth and Sports. Siranush takes great interest in conflict resolution, gender equality and education.

Armenpress: Ararat Mirzoyan, Jean-Baptiste Lemoyne sign “Armenian-French economic cooperation roadmap”

Ararat Mirzoyan, Jean-Baptiste Lemoyne sign “Armenian-French economic cooperation roadmap”

Save

Share

 20:18, 9 December, 2021

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 9, ARMENPRESS. The first joint sitting of the Armenian-French economic cooperation working group took place on December 9 in Paris. The Armenian delegation was headed by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia Ararat Mirzoyan, the French delegation was headed by the Secretary of State of Foreign Affairs of France Jean-Baptiste Lemoyne. The Armenian delegation also included the Deputy Ministers of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure, Economy, Finance, High-Tech Industry, Advisor to the Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and other officials.

As ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the MFA Armenia, Minister Mirzoyan thanked Secretary of State Jean-Baptiste Lemoyne for the warm reception and contributing to the organization of the effective discussions, emphasizing that the session is the result of the nearly one year of mutual consistent work and the efforts and agreements at the top level of the two countries.

Ararat Mirzoyan stressed that it is necessary to carry out purposeful work to implement the agreements reached by the top leadership of the two countries aimed at the intensification of economic relations, which will correspond to the level of privileged relations between Armenia and France.

During the discussions, the sides highlighted the diversification of the Armenian-French trade and economic relations, the need to enrich the cooperation with new economic programs, and the activation of mutual investments. The interlocutors also noted the need to intensify contacts between the business circles of France and Armenia, in particular, through mutual visits of delegations and organization of economic events. The current activity of the French Development Agency in Armenia was emphasized, the implementation of new programs was highlighted.

Within the framework of the sitting, Foreign Minister of Armenia Ararat Mirzoyan and the French Secretary of State Jean-Baptiste Lemoyne signed the "Armenian-French Economic Cooperation Roadmap for 2021-2026”. The main goal of the document is to create a strategy and framework for bilateral economic programs between Armenia and France for the next five years, which will include infrastructure, urban development, energy, agriculture, tourism, innovation, high technology, healthcare and other promising areas.



FM Babayan highlights international recognition of Artsakh, de-occupation of territories as a priority

Save

Share

 17:13, 4 December, 2021

STEPANAKERT, DECEMBER 4, ARMENPRESS. Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Artsakh David Babayan participated in the conference of the ARF-Dashnaktsutyun Hay Dat Committees and Offices, which took place in the Grand Hall of the National Assembly of Artsakh, and delivered a speech, the Artsakh MFA reports.

In his speech, the Foreign Minister touched upon the main directions of the foreign policy of the Republic of Artsakh, regional developments, and the Azerbaijani-Karabakh conflict settlement process.

Among the foreign policy priorities David Babayan pointed out the international recognition of the Republic, de-occupation of the territories of the Republic of Artsakh, comprehensive and just settlement of the Azerbaijani-Karabakh conflict, as well as the development and expansion of relations with different countries and their entities.

The Minister stressed that any status within Azerbaijan is unacceptable for the people and authorities of Artsakh, which would mean annihilation of Artsakh and the Armenian statehood.

For the effective solution of those problems, the Foreign Minister noted the importance of the status of Artsakh as a geopolitical actor, the pan-Armenian unity, and perception of Artsakh as a supreme national value in Armenia and in the Diaspora.

David Babayan highly appreciated the works carried out by the Hay Dat Offices and their contribution to the development and strengthening of Artsakh. The Minister expressed gratitude to the ARF Hay Dat for its patriotic activities and expressed hope that the structure would continue its work with the same zeal and dedication and that the Artsakh-centrism would remain among the pillars of its activity.

During the conference, the Foreign Minister also answered the questions of the participants related to the challenges in the foreign policy sphere and the works carried out to overcome them.