Sweden Angers Turkey With Armenian Vote

SWEDEN ANGERS TURKEY WITH ARMENIAN VOTE

RTE.ie – Ireland
March 11 2010

Turkey has recalled its ambassador from Sweden after its parliament
voted to brand the World War One killing of Armenians by Ottoman
forces as genocide.

Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan said: ‘We strongly condemn this
resolution, which is made for political calculations.

‘It does not correspond to the close friendship of our two nations.

Advertisement’We are recalling our ambassador for consultations. We
are cancelling the Turkey-Sweden summit of March 17.’

The issue of the Armenian massacres is deeply sensitive in Turkey.

Turkey accepts that many Christian Armenians were killed by Ottoman
Turks but vehemently denies that up to 1.5m died and that it amounted
to genocide.

A US House of Representatives committee last week approved a
non-binding measure condemning the killings.

a.html

http://www.rte.ie/news/2010/0311/armeni

Armenia’s Ambassador To Russia Meets Nikolay Rizhkov

ARMENIA’S AMBASSADOR TO RUSSIA MEETS NIKOLAY RIZHKOV

armradio.am
11.03.2010 15:43

Armenian Ambassador to Russia Oleg Yesayan had a meeting with
Nikolay Rizhkov, Co-Chair of the Interparliamentary Commission on
Cooperation between the Federal Council of Russian Federation and
Armenian National Assembly, Chairman of the Committee on Natural
Monopolies of the Federation Council.

Congratulating Oleg Yesayan on his appointment, Nikolay Rizhkov voiced
hope that his skills and experience would contribute to the further
development of the Armenian-Russian relations.

Nikolay Rizhkov presented the agenda of the sitting of the
Armenian-Russian Interparliamentary Commission to be held in Moscow
from March 21 to 23 and noted that the Commission had done a lot
towards reinforcement and development of Armenian-Russian cultural
and economic ties.

The interlocutors exchanged views on the Armenian-Turkish relations
and the process of settlement of the Karabakh issue.

The RA Ambassador Met To Syria Met The Aleppo Governor

THE RA AMBASSADOR MET TO SYRIA MET THE ALEPPO GOVERNOR

Aysor
March 9 2010
Armenia

Yesterday Arshak Polandian, the Armenian ambassador to Syria, visited
Aleppo, where he had separate meetings with the governor of Aleppo
Ali Ahmad Mansura and the representatives of the Armenian community
of Aleppo.

The press, information and public relations department of the RA
MFA informs that during the meetings have been discussed issues
concerning the official visit of Armenian president Serzh Sargsyan
to Syria and Aleppo.

ANKARA: Political Parties Lash Out At General Amnesty Proposal

POLITICAL PARTIES LASH OUT AT GENERAL AMNESTY PROPOSAL

Hurriyet
March 9 2010
Turkey

Both the ruling and opposition parties have criticized a main
opposition party deputy’s proposal that the government consider
a general amnesty for those who stand accused of terror-related
offenses. The main opposition leader Deniz Baykal was among those
criticizing his deputy’s suggestion

CHP leader Deniz Baykal

A main opposition party deputy’s proposal for a general amnesty to
end the long-standing terror problem in the country has been roundly
criticized by a number of parties – including his own.

Both the ruling and opposition parties, including the main opposition
leader, have criticized the proposal, displaying cross-partisan
consensus on the matter during their parliamentary group meetings
Tuesday.

Kemal Kılıcdaroglu, parliamentary group deputy leader for the
Republican People’s Party, or CHP, recently said his party would lend
its support to a possible general amnesty for those who stand accused
of terror-related offenses to end the terror problem associated with
the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party, or PKK.

Asked for comments on his deputy’s remarks on the matter, CHP leader
Deniz Baykal said Kılıcdaroglu’s statements were wrong. "He should
not have brought such an issue to the agenda," Baykal told reporters,
speaking after his party’s parliamentary group meeting. Baykal,
on the other hand, did not mention the issue during his address to
lawmakers in Parliament.

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Monday it was impossible to
understand the CHP’s suggestion. His deputy, Bulent Arınc, meanwhile,
claimed the main opposition party’s suggestion implied a kind of
demand for the release of Abdullah Ocalan, the imprisoned leader of
the PKK. Arınc also said the government could not approach such a
proposal positively.

Baykal criticizes government’s reform package

In his address, Baykal also criticized the ruling Justice and
Development Party, or AKP’s, attempts to push for Constitutional
amendments involving a judiciary reform package.

Baykal said such comprehensive and significant amendments should be
carried out through the broader consensus and participation of society,
adding that Constitutional Court President HaÅ~_im Kılıc’s recent
remarks urging the government to seek a broader consensus should be
taken seriously.

"The constitutional changes are not a matter solely confined to a
single political party. They concern all of Turkey. This project will
be the Constitution of 70 million people living in this country,"
Baykal said. "Turkey’s political parties, professional organizations,
judicial institutions, non-governmental organizations, universities
and unions should all contribute to the initiative."

Baykal said his party would not let the Supreme Board of Prosecutors
and Judges, or HSYK, be restructured like Turkey’s Radio and Television
Supreme Council, or RTUK, which has been highly criticized due to
the perception that it is politically influenced.

Touching on the recent resolution of the U.S. House Foreign Affairs
Committee labeling the Ottoman-era massacre of Armenians as "genocide,"
Baykal also criticized the protocols to normalize relations between
Armenia and Turkey.

Devlet Bahceli, leader of the Nationalist Movement Party, or MHP,
also criticized CHP deputy Kılıcdaroglu’s proposal.

"This is the demand of the PKK and the European Union. The CHP should
clarify its stance with regard to the issue," Bahceli said, speaking
to media after his parliamentary group meeting Tuesday.

Bahceli also criticized the U.S. House’s resolution on the Armenian
issue, saying, "It is not the business and right of New York, Texas
and Washington to judge about an issue which concern’s Turkey’s Edirne,
Van, Trabzon, Bitlis, Sivas, Antalya, Hatay, Igdır and Mugla."

Bahceli also called on the government to freeze relations with Armenia,
withdraw protocols from Parliament, close the Ä°ncirlik base and
cancel Erdogan’s visit to the United States.

Emir Kusturica Sees Great Spiritual Potential In Armenia

EMIR KUSTURICA SEES GREAT SPIRITUAL POTENTIAL IN ARMENIA

Noyan Tapan
March 9, 2010

ETCHMIADZIN, MARCH 9, NOYAN TAPAN. The famous Serbian filmmaker Emir
Kusturica was received by the Supreme Patriarch and Catholicos of
All Armenians Karekin II on March 6.

NT was informed by the Information System of the Mother See of Holy
Etchmiadzin that the Supreme Patriarch spoke about the the Armenian
Church, its important role in the life of the Armenian people and
the preservation of the national spiritual values and the national
identity. He also informed the guest about the significant contribution
that the Armenian Church has made to the creation and development of
Armenian culture.

Karekin II recalled his meeting with the Serbian filmmaker in Moscow
in January of this year when His Holiness and E. Kusturica received
the 2009 Patriach Alexy II Prizes for their great contribution to
the establishment and promotion of spiritual values in society.

E. Kusturica stated that he was pleased to visit Armenia and get
acquainted with the Armenian people who resemble the Serbians in
terms of the sufferings that both nations had to endure. He also
spoke about the significance of spiritual values, underlining that
he saw great spiritual potential in Armenia.

What Do We Know About Women’s Experiences?

WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT WOMEN’S EXPERIENCES?
By Talin Suciyan

now-about-women%e2%80%99s-experiences/
Mar 8th, 2010

"What does it mean to be an Armenian woman living in the diaspora?"

This question may have completely different answers in different
contexts and in different places. Nonetheless, for me, it is impossible
to disregard the overlapping characteristics of being an Armenian woman
in Istanbul, being a diasporan woman in Armenia, and most currently,
being a member of the Armenian community in the middle of Europe,
in Munich.

Neither in Armenia nor in Munich is it extraordinary to be a working
woman. After all, women have been encouraged to take an active part
in the labor force of both societies for quite some time. Being part
of a labor force, however, does not necessarily mean being emancipated.

Women living in Armenia are one of the best examples of this. They
are very visible in Armenia’s public sphere, baking lahmaco
(lahmajun), working in supermarkets, working as journalists, as
hairdressers… Yet, this does not mean they have settled their
accounts with patriarchal worldviews.

Marriage is a very central institution around which moral codes are
established. Matchmaking is a kind of system that functions even
among people who are hardly acquainted with one another. That is,
you do not have to know someone well in order to find him or her
someone to marry. Is there any Armenian community where an unmarried
woman is not regarded as a potential bride?

Matchmaking functions overseas, too. For instance, a woman from
Istanbul and a man from New Jersey can be easily matched (and,
of course, the woman is expected to change her life radically in
such cases). Since "going west" is always considered to be "good,"
the woman should feel that she is indeed very lucky to have "found"
someone from abroad, and must adapt herself to the new conditions as
soon as possible. The change of country, continent, culture, economic
conditions, etc. all are to be absorbed by the woman.

Partnership or being in a relationship defined by love is not regarded
as "enough" by Armenian society. According to unwritten rules,
a relationship should aim at marriage and having children. Without
being engaged, being in a love relationship for a long period of
time just does not fit. In Istanbul, for example, if two people are
dating by the arrangement of matchmakers, they are not expected to
remain partners or lovers only. After all, matchmaking has its own
aim-which is more important than love. And of course, there is a
difference if a woman or man breaks the engagement. A man can break
as many engagements and relations as he wants, but a woman will always
be remembered by the incident.

Virginity remains an important issue both in Turkey and in Armenia.

Any rumor implying that a woman has had sexual relations with a man,
outside of marriage, is one of the most dishonoring things to happen
to her and her family. Last year, on March 8, I was in Armenia and
realized the depth of so-called tradition of "red-apple." After the
first night as husband and wife, if the bride is a virgin, the family
and relatives of the groom bring red apples to her house. If by chance,
the apples are not brought to the bride’s house, then grave problems
can arise.

Moreover, if a woman is in a violent relationship/marriage where her
husband is using physical or verbal violence, it is very difficult for
her to find help or resources among the local Armenian community in
the diaspora. They would most likely hear the stereotypical response,
"Do not worry it will pass," from those they tell. Having extramarital
relations for married men is regarded as normal (after all, "All men
cheat") But, the same does not apply for women, of course.

Being divorced is an uneasy condition, too. For a divorced man,
matchmakers start working as soon as possible to find another bride.

For the divorced woman, the situation is vastly different. She is
labeled as "divorced" and will carry that social stigma for the rest
of her life. On top of it, it is very probable that she will experience
pressure from her parental family too.

What if, as a woman, you’d prefer to avoid all of this and not get
married? What happens then? Would it be possible to gain some more
freedom? Not really. An emancipated woman who would like to live her
life the way she likes is probably the most difficult type of woman
to cope with.

These are my observations of situations I have witnessed many times.

I’d like to stress again that in different places, women may be dealing
with totally different issues. This short article therefore does not
claim to represent a body of issues that are omnipresent.

While writing this piece, two questions were constantly in my mind:
Where do the Armenian women in the diaspora go to when faced with
violence, rape, or abuse? Do they receive professional help from the
communities that they belong to? Do they seek help from the women’s
organizations where they live? Or do they keep silent?

Is it not time to talk about these issues? Armenian women from all
over the world, from the Middle East, from Australia, from Europe,
from the Americas: What are our experiences? What kind of issues do
we have? What ways can we deal with our problems? Is it not worth
discussing?

Talin Suciyan is an Istanbul Armenian journalist who lived in Armenia
from 2007-09. She is currently based in Munich, Germany, where she
is pursuing her graduate studies. She contributes regularly to Agos
and other newspapers in Turkey.

http://www.asbarez.com/78101/what-do-we-k

ANKARA: Genocide Allegations And A New Turkey

GENOCIDE ALLEGATIONS AND A NEW TURKEY

Turish Press
March 8 2010

STAR- Tonight everybody in Ankara is casting their eyes across the
Atlantic. The issue is well-known. A resolution alleging that the
1915 events amounted to ‘genocide’ is facing a vote in the US House
of Representatives Foreign Relations Committee. As this column goes
to bed, we’re still awaiting the vote.

Turkey is carefully watching where the issue is going, while making
clear that if the resolution passes, all options, including recalling
the ambassador to US for consultations, are on the table. [Note:
After the vote, Turkey did recall its ambassador.]

But the vote’s result won’t be the last word or the end of the world.

Besides, things for Turkey are quite different than in the past.

Turkey’s position in its region and the world has moved forward.

Despite difficulties taking some steps, Turkey wants to be a mover
for a solution, not part of the problem.

There have been some problems with the protocols signed last year
between Turkey and Armenia. Taking into account both countries’
domestic balances, it’s not an easy step for either, especially
on such a complicated issue. Ankara’s stance on the Karabakh issue
is also at stake, as it should be. Contrary to what some believe,
this stance is a part of its policy of not obstructing a solution
but making it a lasting one.

But none of these problems can change the fact that last year Turkey
and Armenia started to talk. This is what we should focus on. What
Ankara needs to do now is step up efforts to get Russia involved.

Russia’s support will lessen Azerbaijan’s unease.

Let’s turn back to across the Atlantic. It’s well known that this
bothersome issue comes up every April. But Ankara has fallen flat in
countering the Armenian arguments and actors pushing the issue.

As a result, despite Turkey’s new role, no decision will be
definitive. Everybody should adapt to a Turkey thinking differently
from the big powers and even taking steps in spite of them.

A Journey to Historic Armenia

Azg, Armenia
March 4 2010

"A JOURNEY TO HISTORIC ARMENIA"

Edward and Mary Ann Kazanjian of Belmont will present an illustrated
talk entitled "A Journey To Historic Armenia: There Is Something
There," on Thursday, March 18, 2010, at 7:30 p.m., at the National
Association for Armenian Studies and Research (NAASR) Center, 395
Concord Ave., Belmont, MA.

In June 2009, the Kazanjians traveled with a group of Armenians from
the U.S.A., Cyprus, and Austria, led by veteran tour guide Armen
Aroyan of the Armenian Heritage Society (CA). They ventured on a 3,000
mile journey through more than thirty cities and villages in historic
Armenia, including Edward’s family’s ancestral Kharpert Veri Tagh
(Upper City) and Mary Ann’s ancestral Yozgat, as well as Kayseri,
Sivas, Shabinkarahisar, Erzinga, Erzurum, Sarakamish, Kars, Ani,
Ararat, Van, Aghtamar, Engil, Mush, Changli, Kighi, Bingol, Lice,
Nikhri, Palu, Elazig, Diyarbakir, Chunkush, Malatya, Husenig, and
Kharpert.

The Kazanjians will present in pictures, video, and music their own
account of their first-time trip to Historic Armenian lands in
modern-day Turkey. Among their memorable experiences was discovering
Mary Ann’s great-great-grandfather’s home in Yozgat and Edward’s
finding the sites and remnants of the St. James and St. Stephen’s
Churches in Kharpert.

Following the overwhelming response to the Kazanjians’ talk at the
Armenian Library and Museum of America (ALMA) in November 2009, it was
decided to schedule an encore presentation at NAASR. The couple will
be returning to visit portions of Historic Armenia in the spring of
2010.

Edward Kazanjian recently retired after a 41-year career as: a General
Dynamics engineer; public schools administrator in Framingham,
Brookline, and Billerica and most recently as Assistant Superintendent
of Schools in Westwood, MA; and sixteen years as Executive Director
and Senior Consultant for an Educational Cooperative. He is still
consulting part time. Mary Ann Arakelian Kazanjian is a former
elementary school teacher and has been a church organist for 45 years,
first at St. James and currently at St. Stephen’s Armenian Churches in
Watertown.

Admission to the event is free (donations appreciated). The NAASR
Center is located opposite the First Armenian Church and next to the
U.S. Post Office. Ample parking is available around the building and
in adjacent areas. The lecture will begin promptly at 7:30 p.m. More
information about the lecture is available by calling 617-489-1610,
faxing 617-484-1759, e-mailing [email protected], or writing to NAASR, 395
Concord Ave., Belmont, MA 02478.

Turkey’s US ambassador arrives home to discuss ‘genocide’ vote

Earthtimes (press release)
March 6 2010

Turkey’s US ambassador arrives home to discuss ‘genocide’ vote

Posted : Sat, 06 Mar 2010 12:16:09 GMT
By : dpa

Istanbul – Turkey’s ambassador to the United States arrived in his
home country Saturday to discuss with senior officials the recent
passage of a resolution in the US legislature accusing Turkey of
committing genocide against its Armenian population during World War
I. Namik Tan said he is to meet with President Abdullah Gul, Prime
Minister Recep Rayyip Erdogan and Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu on
the matter before returning to the US.

A committee of the US House of Representatives approved the resolution
Thursday by a 23-22 vote. The leadership of the House is considering
whether to bring the measure to a vote of the full body, which would
please Armenian populations in the US, but rile Turkey – a NATO ally –
which is sensitive about the allegations.

Leading politicians, including US President Barack Obama and Senator
Hillary Rodham Clinton, have said the resolution could endanger US
relations with Turkey and ongoing peace talks between Turkey and
Armenia.

Armenians contend that up to 1.5 million of their own were
systematically killed by the Ottoman Turks during World War I. Turkey
has long denied the genocide claim, saying the number of Armenians
killed was much lower and that the deaths were the result of violent
turbulence that also affected other groups at the time.

2770,turkeys-us-ambassador-arrives-home-to-discuss -genocide-vote.html

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/31

US officials try to limit damage caused by vote over genocide

US officials try to limit damage caused by vote over genocideGiles
Whittell, Washington

The Times/uk
Giles Whittell, Washington

March 6, 2010

US officials tried to limit the damage to relations with Ankara
yesterday after the Turkish Government condemned the Obama
Administration’s failure to prevent a vote labelling the murder of 1.5
million Armenians as genocide.

The Turkish Ambassador to Washington arrived back in Ankara after
being recalled in protest over the vote, as while theWhite House
issued a strong warning to Congress to drop its effort to force the US
to change its official position on the 1915 killings.

`Any further congressional action is an impediment to ongoing efforts
to normalise relations between Turkey and Armenia,’ a senior
administration official told The Times. `We have a broad and strategic
relationship with Turkey and continue to support its efforts to
improve relations with Armenia.’

A regional backlash against Thursday’s vote was already brewing in
Azerbaijan, where President Aliyev joined Turkey to condemn what a
spokesman called `a unilateral decision… accepted under pressure
from pro-Armenian congressmen’.

The spokesman repeated Azerbaijan’s demand that Turkey and Armenia
shelve their efforts at diplomatic rapprochement until Armenia has
resolved its dispute with Baku over the mainly-Christian enclave of
Nagorno-Karabakh. Though within Azerbaijan’s borders, the enclave has
been administered by Armenia since a war in the early 1990s that left
nearly 30,000 people dead.

The Turkish Ambassador to Washington arrived back in Ankara after
being recalled in protest over the vote and Ahmet Davutoglu, the
Turkish Foreign Minister, summoned the US Ambassador to Ankara for
talks.

He said that the White House could have prevented the vote, which
calls on President Obama to refer to the massacres as genocide in his
annual speech to Armenians in the US.

`If an adviser had whispered `No’ instead of `Yes’ in the ear of a
member of the House of Representatives, the vote would have been
different,’ Mr Davutoglu said.

The House Committee on Foreign Affairs approved the resolution by 23
votes to 22. Nancy Pelosi, the House Speaker, can refuse to call a
vote by the full chamber, but has shown sympathy for the Armenian
position in the past.