In Turkey, Ultra-Nationalist Lawyer Wins Supporters As Enthusiasm Fo

IN TURKEY, ULTRA-NATIONALIST LAWYER WINS SUPPORTERS AS ENTHUSIASM FOR THE EU FALLS

The Associated Press
International Herald Tribune, France
Aug 6 2006

ISTANBUL, Turkey Kemal Kerincsiz believes Turkey is one of the
greatest, freest countries in the world. Insult it, and you could
find yourself facing him in court.

To some in this country of 70 million, the ultra-nationalist lawyer
is the voice of a proud people against a patronizing West. To others,
he is the voice of intolerance and excessive patriotism – a major
embarrassment that could derail Turkey’s more than 40-year-old bid
to join the European Union.

As the ubiquitous, mustachioed leader of the Turkish Lawyers’ Union,
Kerincsiz is the reason writers and intellectuals are regularly put
on trial in Turkey. When the European Union talks about slow progress
on democratic reforms, they’re largely talking about him.

Kerincsiz gained international notoriety this year for dragging
celebrated novelist Orhan Pamuk to court for allegedly insulting
Turkishness. Pamuk, often cited as a candidate for the Nobel prize
in literature, was acquitted.

But the lawyer has met with success in less high-profile cases,
winning a conviction against an Armenian-Turkish journalist for the
same offense.

He has also opened dozens of other cases against journalists, writers
and intellectuals, including one set to go to court this month against
Arizona-based Turkish novelist Elif Shafak. And he recently leveled
charges of insulting the Turkish military against Dutch European
Parliament member Joost Lagendijk, a frequent official observer of
Turkish affairs whom Kerincsiz calls a "foreign invader."

"The Lawyers’ Union is behind nearly all of them," the disarmingly
polite lawyer said of the cases in an interview with The Associated
Press at his cluttered, lightless Istanbul office. "We have several
cases open against writers. Most of them are for insulting Turkishness,
insulting Ataturk (the founder of modern Turkey), cooling the people’s
willingness to serve in the army, you know.

There are dozens of cases we have running."

Kerincsiz and his organization of some 700 nationalist lawyers have
exasperated not only EU officials – who have said the cases must
be stopped or Turkey will jeopardize its hopes of joining the EU –
but also Turkey’s Western-looking intellectuals and its leadership.

Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul complained once that the freedom of
expression cases hurt Turkey’s image as much as the 1978 film "Midnight
Express," in which an American drug smuggler is sent to a hellish
Turkish prison and brutalized, tortured and raped by Turkish guards.

But nevermind, Kerincsiz says, there’s not much use in trying to
improve Turkey’s image in the West anyway.

"The Turk is not a race to live with the European. He is always the
other, the rival," the thin, smooth-talking Kerincsiz explained from
behind stacks of files on his desk.

His office was decorated with Turkish flags and featured a tree chart
in the waiting room showing various branches of the Turkic races.

Kerincsiz believes Turkey’s future is in the East and represents a
growingly powerful faction of Turkish society tired of being told
it must aspire to be more like the West. Recently, his view appears
to be gaining traction in the government, with Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Egdogan increasingly making foreign policy overtures to the
Middle East – and away from Europe.

"The Easterner has to insult himself and degrade his own culture to
ingratiate himself with the West," Kerincsiz said. "Our place is in
Eastern culture, our real aim is finding allies among our own people."

By that he meant primarily the Turkic peoples of Central Asia,
which he hopes to see included one day in the "Turkish Union" led by
Turkey. He admits this is a far-off dream, but it’s possible, he says,
especially when one looks at the mishmash of different cultures joined
together in the EU.

He denied the court cases were attempts to derail Turkey’s EU bid.

But Kerincsiz makes no effort to hide his view that the European
Union is an enemy of Turkey, one intent on breaking it apart and
keeping it from becoming a major world power.

In the year that has followed Turkey’s opening of EU negotiations
last Oct. 3, it has become clear that even if they don’t entirely
share Kerincsiz’s view, Turks are cooling in their enthusiasm for
accession, and he is tapping into the sources of their discontent.

The latest Eurobarometer survey found only 44 percent of Turks surveyed
thought EU membership would be a good thing for Turkey, compared to
55 percent last autumn. Last spring, 66 percent said they supported
EU membership.

Analysts suggest the drop is a backlash against Europe’s disapproval
of Turkey – a backlash from which nationalists like Kerincsiz who play
up Turkey’s strengths and disparage the EU’s "insults" are likely to
benefit most.

There are indications that it’s already happening. "More Turks think
their membership would be primarily in the interest of the Union than
of mutual interest to both," reads the text of the July Eurobarometer
survey.

This growing mutual resentment is not likely to be improved by the
latest draft of Monday’s EU progress report on Turkey, which said
reforms had slowed and accused Turkey of "regression."

The author of the report also urged Turkey to recognize the killings
of Armenians by Turks around the time of World War I as "genocide"
and to reform its penal code.

But Kerincsiz isn’t worried.

"The EU won’t last long," he says, and dares any Turkish government to
try to change the laws against insulting Turkishness or the Turkish
republic. Kerincsiz and his Lawyers’ Union believe such laws have
great support among a population increasingly frustrated with Europe
and looking to its own potential greatness.

"Don’t worry, we won’t be unemployed," he says with a smile. "The
only salvation will be a nationalist government."

ISTANBUL, Turkey Kemal Kerincsiz believes Turkey is one of the
greatest, freest countries in the world. Insult it, and you could
find yourself facing him in court.

To some in this country of 70 million, the ultra-nationalist lawyer
is the voice of a proud people against a patronizing West. To others,
he is the voice of intolerance and excessive patriotism – a major
embarrassment that could derail Turkey’s more than 40-year-old bid
to join the European Union.

As the ubiquitous, mustachioed leader of the Turkish Lawyers’ Union,
Kerincsiz is the reason writers and intellectuals are regularly put
on trial in Turkey. When the European Union talks about slow progress
on democratic reforms, they’re largely talking about him.

Kerincsiz gained international notoriety this year for dragging
celebrated novelist Orhan Pamuk to court for allegedly insulting
Turkishness. Pamuk, often cited as a candidate for the Nobel prize
in literature, was acquitted.

But the lawyer has met with success in less high-profile cases,
winning a conviction against an Armenian-Turkish journalist for the
same offense.

He has also opened dozens of other cases against journalists, writers
and intellectuals, including one set to go to court this month against
Arizona-based Turkish novelist Elif Shafak. And he recently leveled
charges of insulting the Turkish military against Dutch European
Parliament member Joost Lagendijk, a frequent official observer of
Turkish affairs whom Kerincsiz calls a "foreign invader."

"The Lawyers’ Union is behind nearly all of them," the disarmingly
polite lawyer said of the cases in an interview with The Associated
Press at his cluttered, lightless Istanbul office. "We have several
cases open against writers. Most of them are for insulting Turkishness,
insulting Ataturk (the founder of modern Turkey), cooling the people’s
willingness to serve in the army, you know.

There are dozens of cases we have running."

Kerincsiz and his organization of some 700 nationalist lawyers have
exasperated not only EU officials – who have said the cases must
be stopped or Turkey will jeopardize its hopes of joining the EU –
but also Turkey’s Western-looking intellectuals and its leadership.

Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul complained once that the freedom of
expression cases hurt Turkey’s image as much as the 1978 film "Midnight
Express," in which an American drug smuggler is sent to a hellish
Turkish prison and brutalized, tortured and raped by Turkish guards.

But nevermind, Kerincsiz says, there’s not much use in trying to
improve Turkey’s image in the West anyway.

"The Turk is not a race to live with the European. He is always the
other, the rival," the thin, smooth-talking Kerincsiz explained from
behind stacks of files on his desk.

His office was decorated with Turkish flags and featured a tree chart
in the waiting room showing various branches of the Turkic races.

Kerincsiz believes Turkey’s future is in the East and represents a
growingly powerful faction of Turkish society tired of being told
it must aspire to be more like the West. Recently, his view appears
to be gaining traction in the government, with Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Egdogan increasingly making foreign policy overtures to the
Middle East – and away from Europe.

"The Easterner has to insult himself and degrade his own culture to
ingratiate himself with the West," Kerincsiz said. "Our place is in
Eastern culture, our real aim is finding allies among our own people."

By that he meant primarily the Turkic peoples of Central Asia,
which he hopes to see included one day in the "Turkish Union" led by
Turkey. He admits this is a far-off dream, but it’s possible, he says,
especially when one looks at the mishmash of different cultures joined
together in the EU.

He denied the court cases were attempts to derail Turkey’s EU bid.

But Kerincsiz makes no effort to hide his view that the European
Union is an enemy of Turkey, one intent on breaking it apart and
keeping it from becoming a major world power.

In the year that has followed Turkey’s opening of EU negotiations
last Oct. 3, it has become clear that even if they don’t entirely
share Kerincsiz’s view, Turks are cooling in their enthusiasm for
accession, and he is tapping into the sources of their discontent.

The latest Eurobarometer survey found only 44 percent of Turks surveyed
thought EU membership would be a good thing for Turkey, compared to
55 percent last autumn. Last spring, 66 percent said they supported
EU membership.

Analysts suggest the drop is a backlash against Europe’s disapproval
of Turkey – a backlash from which nationalists like Kerincsiz who play
up Turkey’s strengths and disparage the EU’s "insults" are likely to
benefit most.

There are indications that it’s already happening. "More Turks think
their membership would be primarily in the interest of the Union than
of mutual interest to both," reads the text of the July Eurobarometer
survey.

This growing mutual resentment is not likely to be improved by the
latest draft of Monday’s EU progress report on Turkey, which said
reforms had slowed and accused Turkey of "regression."

The author of the report also urged Turkey to recognize the killings
of Armenians by Turks around the time of World War I as "genocide"
and to reform its penal code.

But Kerincsiz isn’t worried.

"The EU won’t last long," he says, and dares any Turkish government to
try to change the laws against insulting Turkishness or the Turkish
republic. Kerincsiz and his Lawyers’ Union believe such laws have
great support among a population increasingly frustrated with Europe
and looking to its own potential greatness.

"Don’t worry, we won’t be unemployed," he says with a smile. "The
only salvation will be a nationalist government."

Municipality Removes Trade Halls Not Complying With Norms

MUNICIPALITY REMOVES TRADE HALLS NOT COMPLYING WITH NORMS

Panorama.am
13:58 04/09/06

Karen Gevorgyan, trade and service department head at Yerevan
municipality, told reporters today that 48 shops were removed from
the main avenues of Tigran Mets and Komitas in Yerevan and another
12 were dismantled on Acharyan street. The municipal authorities
required from 73 other shops to modernize.

Gevorgyan also said Yerevan is going to have cattle markets. "Cattle
may be sold in Yerevan but in proper places," the department head
said. In his words, the municipal authorities have discussed the
issue with the ministry of agriculture. It is expected that four such
markets will be opened.

Bank Employee Deposits Metal Instead of Gold

Panorama.am

17:27 01/09/06

BANK EMPLOYEE DEPOSITS METAL INSTEAD OF GOLD

A. Ghaytanjyan, goldsmith-expert at Malatia branch of Unibank,
skillfully managed to deposit other metals instead of gold. Armenian
Prosecutor General Office reports that Ghaytanjyan has deposited
metals instead of gold under the name of 186 citizens without their
knowledge. The deal was committed with the prior consent of
T. Grigoryan, the material responsible person at the same
bank. Ghaytanjyan misappropriated $ 369,514 based on fake credit
contracts. The case is forwarded to the Armenia police general
investigation department. /Panorama.am/

Documents on Karabakh Settlement to Be Published Sooner or Later

PanARMENIAN.Net

Documents on Karabakh Settlement to Be Published Sooner or Later
01.09.2006 15:01 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ `The settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict is
a special process where satisfaction with indeterminate outcomes is
impossible. If there is no result, so the possibility of the
settlement has not been exhausted,’ RA President’s Spokesman Victor
Soghomonyan told journalists. In his words, if the sides reach an
agreement till the yearend, it will mean that the possibility was
completely used. At the same time Soghomonyan pointed out to
non-constructive and unreal statements on Karabakh conflict by
official Baku.

According to Soghomonyan, the publication of the settlement principles
was incomplete and did not reflect the whole process. `The Armenian
side confirms readiness to publish all the documents is case of
partial publication of the settlement principles in future,’ he said
adding that then `everyone will see the contents of the talks and the
side preventing the settlement.’

In Soghomonyan’s opinion these documents will be published sooner or
later, since with time secret documents become the property of the
publics. `History will sort things out,’ he underscored, reported
newsarmenia.ru.

Arkadiy Ghukassyan: I Undoubtedly Believe In NKR International Recog

ARKADIY GHUKASSYAN: I UNDOUBTEDLY BELIEVE IN NKR INTERNATIONAL RECOGNITION

Stepanakert, August 31. ArmInfo. In view of 15th anniversary of
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic’s formation, NKR President Arkadiy Ghukassyan
answered the questions of electronic site of "Azat Artsakh" Republican
newspaper. Several hundred questions from Karabakh, Armenia, Russia,
USA, Azerbaijan and other countries, concerning different spheres,
entered the editorial office.

As the ArmInfo own correspondent in Stepanakert informs, asked "Do you
believe in International recognition of Nagorno Karabakh Republic?",
A. Ghukassyan answered: "Undoubtedly. When our people had declared,
at the referendum, for NKR independence 15 years ago, it thought first
of all about its future and not about the possible response of the
International community. NKR, independent from Azerbaijan, is not a
self-purpose but the only condition of the Karabakh people existence
on the land of its ancestors, of its development and prosperity. We
clearly understood that the International recognition of NKR is a
long and extremely difficult way. But, finally, all depends on us,
on our will, patience, and ability to overcome difficulties and
our readiness to build a legal state. The Nagorno Karabakh Republic
is de-facto formed and this is recognized by many in the world. We
could defend our independence in the war, moreover, we overcame its
consequences for a relatively short historical period of time and
built a state which left Azerbaijan behind it by many parameters,
including the level of democratization of the political-social life".

Asked "If you and the military-political authorities intend to hand
over the territories of the so-called security zone without NKR
independence recognition?", the President answered: "We shall never
agree with such settlement which can prejudice the Karabakh security,
not to mention the independence from Azerbaijan. I am sure the attempt
to solve any issues, including that of the security zone around NKR,
is a way to war. We have no closed subjects, however, it does not mean
we are ready for one-sided concessions. The degree of our concessions
depends on the degree of Azerbaijan ‘s concessions".

Asked "How would you comment the recent expression of OSCE MG
American Co-chairman, Mathew Bryza, saying that the participation
or non-participation of Nagorno Karabakh in the negotiation process
depends on the will of Armenia and Azerbaijan?", A. Ghukassyan
answered: "Only Azerbaijan stands against NKR participation in
negotiations as a conflict party. Baku prefers to deal with Yerevan in
order to transform the problem of NKR people self-determination into a
plane of territorial claims of Armenia to Azerbaijan. Unfortunately,
the International mediators made concessions to Azerbaijan for the
peaceful process maintenance. But I am sure this concession has a
temporary character. In the documents of Budapest (December, 1994)
Summit of SCCE, the Karabakh side is actually recognized as a conflict
side. Moreover, there are questions which cannot be solved without
our participation. And their number is not less. This circumstance is
fully realized by all the MG Co-chairmen. By the way, when Azerbaijan
had ever turned out in a difficult situation during the war, Baku had
directly contacted with Stepanakert. We have a rather considerable
portfolio of corresponding documents".

Asked by Azeri citizen Akhmedov: "Mr. Ghukassyan, is there actually
any single Armenian in the world who really believes that Azerbaijan
will ever give in Karabakh? Do you in Stepanakert actually want
war? The Azeri army is not the way it was in 1992," Ghukassyan said:
"I will answer in your style: is there actually any single Azeri in
the world who really believes that the Karabakh Armenians will ever
agree to submit to Baku? Do you in Azerbaijan want war?

The Karabakh army is by far not the way it was in 1992. War is not
a solution. Unfortunately, you, Mr. Akhmedov, is a typical victim to
the Azeri propaganda, who denies the right of the Karabakh people to
self-determination – the right that is recognized by the international
mediators: the OSCE MG co-chairs – the biggest world powers – the
US, Russia and France. We should look for reasonable compromises,
while hope for military budget, hope for revenge is a bad, suicidal
hope. Azerbaijan has always been several times stronger than Karabakh
in personnel and hardware, but you all know the results of the previous
war. I think that the Azeri authorities should stop misleading their
people and start natural direct contacts with Stepanakert. We can
really solve many problems if we sit down at the negotiating table.

Asked by Seidova from Ganca (Azerbaijan): "Mr. Ghukassyan, the world
will never recognize the independence of the so-called Nagorno-Karabakh
Republic.

Sooner or later, Azerbaijan will get Karabakh back. Isn’t it better
for you to agree to this at once? You will not deny that the unsettled
Karabakh problem hinders the economic development of Armenia, will
you?," Ghukassyan said: "Dear Ms. Seidova, the Karabakh Armenians have
chosen independence for fully exercising their rights and freedoms
which were grossly violated by the Azeri authorities. Time has shown
that we were right and we have chosen the right way.

Look, what an attitude the authorities of your country are showing
to the Karabakh Armenians today. They are threatening to finish us
off if we refuse to join Azerbaijan. Is this serous? Do civilized
leaders use threats and blackmails when urging their neighbors
to co-exist? The Karabakh people does not hate the Azeri people,
while in your country the situation is opposite. In Azerbaijan the
authorities are actively cultivating hatred towards Armenians. One
proof: you in Azerbaijan present the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict as
Armenian-Azeri conflict. If you happened to wish to visit Nagorny
Karabakh you would see that there is such more freedom of speech and
democracy here than in your country. Unlike Azerbaijan, we are not
forced by anybody in the world to comply with democracy norms or to
hold elections in conformity with the European standards. But despite
everything, despite the protests of your authorities, we persist
in democratizing our society even though the Baku authorities are
constantly threatening us with new war. We are doing this, first of
all, because we need democracy. I assure you that people in the world
perfectly know about progress in Karabakh. No coincidence that the
army of our friends is growing every year. As regards the prospect
of our international recognition, unlike you, I have higher opinion
of the international community. Please, don’t worry for Armenia, you
better think about the abyss your own authorities are leading you to.

To the question of Hakopyan from Tbilisi: "From his very first days
in power of Azeri President Ilham Aliyev has been daily saying that
his country will be able to solve the Karabakh problem by force. Do
you think this scenario possible?," Ghukassyan said: "We can’t
fully exclude the possibility of new war, but I don’t think that
Azerbaijan will take such a suicidal step. We have already got used
to the Azeri authorities’ blackmails. Today they want to scare us
with growing military budget fed by oil revenues, but such policy
is unpromising. First, should Azerbaijan decide to resume war, it
will face a worthy rebuff and quite sad consequences. Second, the
military scenario seems unreal also because the world and regional
powers are not interested in instability in the region because of
its oil projects and their huge investments therein. Third, the Azeri
society does not want war as it suffered much from the military actions
of 1992-1994. Only those who don’t know what war is are speaking of
it now. Those people will hardly fight should the war resume. If you
have noticed, most aggressive are those who are sitting in warm seats
of the Azeri government and, certainly, have "reserve airdromes"
for their children and relatives in case of war. If Azerbaijan was
a democratic country, the Azeri people would ask their former and
present leaders: for how long will they be used as cannon fodder? I
think that it is immoral to think and speak about war. Life has proved
that the Karabakh problem cannot be solved by force."

Russian Leader Reportedly Against Armenian President’s Successor

RUSSIAN LEADER REPORTEDLY AGAINST ARMENIAN PRESIDENT’S SUCCESSOR

Iravunk, Yerevan
29 Aug 06

Text of I. H. report by Armenian newspaper Iravunk on 29 August
entitled "Putin is against but Serzh is for"

[Armenian President] Robert Kocharyan and [Russian President] Vladimir
Putin have recently met in Sochi. They discussed domestic political
developments in Armenia. Russian diplomatic sources say that Vladimir
Putin spoke directly about Robert Kocharyan’s alleged legal successor.

According to our source, it was a surprise even for Kocharyan that
Putin spoke directly without [observing] diplomatic norms: "Russia
does not see and accept [Armenian Defence Minister] Serzh Sarkisyan
your legal successor".

According to the same source and a source close to the Armenian
president, this opinion of the Russian president was conveyed to Serzh
Sarkisyan. He was called to weigh pros and cons. However, as our source
said, Serzh Sarkisyan said that he had made up his mind long ago.

Armenian Minister Urges Azeris To Take "Constructive Approach" In Ka

ARMENIAN MINISTER URGES AZERIS TO TAKE "CONSTRUCTIVE APPROACH" IN KARABAKH TALKS

Public Television of Armenia, Yerevan
28 Aug 06

Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan has met US co-chair of
the OSCE Minsk Group Matthew Bryza within the framework of Caspian
Outlook 2008 Strategic Forum in Slovenia’s Bled city.

Oskanyan today’s speech at the conference was devoted to Armenia-EU
relations within the European Neighbourhood Policy. Vardan Oskanyan
noted that the European Neighbourhood Policy conforms to Armenia’s
reforms programme.

He said that Azerbaijan’s policy to resolve the conflict in a military
way or to extend it is an obstacle for the Karabakh settlement process.

He said that today the [Karabakh] negotiations are at a critical
stage and the international community should do its best to persuade
Azerbaijan to take a realistic and constructive approach and start
a serious discussion of the principles which are on the negotiating
table.

Restaurants Penalized For Exceeding Permitted Music Volume

RESTAURANTS PENALIZED FOR EXCEEDING PERMITTED MUSIC VOLUME

ARMENPRESS
Aug 29 2006

YEREVAN, AUGUST 29, ARMENPRESS: Six restaurants and open-air cafes in
Yerevan were subjected to administrative penalties for violating a
rule that forbids loud music after 11 pm. The restaurants and cafes
were identified during raids by municipality authorities across
night Yerevan.

The most severe penalty set by the law is forbidding a restaurant or
a cafe to hire musicians and play live music while monetary penalties
range between 25,000 to 30,000 drams.

Karen Gevorkian, head of a municipality trade department, said two
restaurants were penalized for exceeding the permitted music volume
last week alone.

He said residents of nearby houses continue to complain and this is
why they will continue to monitor the situation until October.

He said the president instructed health authorities, police and
the municipality to take action and ensure quiet for residents at
night hours.

According to the official figures, Yerevan has 1,073 restaurants,
open-air cafe, bars and night clubs.

Negotiations Over New Head Of Armenian Delegation To PACE To Be Held

NEGOTIATIONS OVER NEW HEAD OF ARMENIAN DELEGATION TO PACE TO BE HELD

Arka News Agency, Armenia
Aug. 23, 2006

YEREVAN, August 23. /ARKA/. A decision on the appointment of a new head
of the Armenian delegation to the CE Parliamentary Assembly (PACE)
will be made after negotiations with the leaders of parliamentary
factions and groups, Speaker of the Armenian Parliament Tigran Torosyan
told reporters.

"This issue has not yet been discussed. A meeting with the leaders
of factions and groups, members of the Armenian delegation to PACE
is shortly to be held for a decision to be made," he said.

Speaker Torosyan is currently head of the Armenian delegation to
PACE. He has repeatedly stated his intention to leave this post.

Pasadena Residents Oppose Armenian School Opening

PASADENA RESIDENTS OPPOSE ARMENIAN SCHOOL OPENING

CBS 2, CA
Aug. 23, 2006

(CBS) PASADENA, Calif. Some Pasadena residents, fearing increased
traffic and noise, opposed a planned that would open an Armenian high
school in the Victory Park area, it was reported Wednesday.

The Armenian General Benevolent Union High School was scheduled to
open Sept. 12, but members of the Mountain Park Villa Condominiums
Homeowners Association said the site was approved for use by
an elementary school or church, not a high school, the Pasadena
Star-News reported.

"Teenagers are not little kids, they can cause a lot of noise and
mischief," former association board member Loraine Bernstein said.

"I’m very hesitant."

Fifty students in grades 9 through 11 already registered for the
coming school year. The school also considered adding a 12th grade
and expanding to about 100 students in coming years.

The Armenian General Benevolent Union, a national organization that
promotes Armenian heritage, owned the land at 2495 E. Mountain St.

for more than a decade, but had been renting much of the space to an
elementary school.

AGBU Chairman Vahe Imasdounian said at a community meeting that the
private school would improve the neighborhood.

"Whatever it takes," he told the newspaper. "We want to make this
neighborhood better and better."