BAKU: Separatist, former minister not included in pardon by Azeri pr

BAKU: Separatist, former minister not included in pardon by Azeri president

Assa-Irada news agency
10 May 04

Baku, 10 May: On Monday, President Ilham Aliyev issued a decree,
pardoning 363 prisoners. However, former defence minister Rahim
Qaziyev and separatist Alikram Humbatov, who attempted to establish
the “Talis Mugan Republic”, were not among those pardoned.

Qaziyev and Humbatov have been sentenced to life imprisonment for their
high treason, committing crimes against the territorial integrity of
Azerbaijan and collaborating with special service bodies of foreign
countries.

Qaziyev, who once headed a group of military troops in Susa District
and had no military education and rank, was appointed defence minister
by certain forces. During his activity as defence minister, the
Azerbaijani army conducted unsuccessful military operations. Besides,
Susa and Lacin districts were occupied by Armenian military troops.

Humbatov, who did not get any military education either, managed
to receive the rank of colonel within a short period thanks to his
foreign supporters and former defence minister Qaziyev.

Humbatov, who declared himself the president of the self-proclaimed
“Talis Mugan Republic”, was sentenced to life imprisonment after Heydar
Aliyev came to power. Qaziyev played “a great role” in carrying out
Humbatov’s separatist actions.

Justice Minister Reacts Angrily To National Assembly Report

JUSTICE MINISTER REACTS ANGRILY TO NATIONAL ASSEMBLY CONTROL CHAMBER’S REPORT

A1 Plus | 21:10:44 | 11-05-2004 | Politics |

Serious abuses in implementation of justice system improvement program,
which received a credit from World Bank, have been mentioned in the
National Assembly Control Chamber report.

Amount of more than 4 million USD was allocated for the repairs of
20 court houses. Only 9 of them were repaired.

The report prompted Justice Minister David Harutyunyan’s discontent. He
is unhappy about the fact that increase in building materials prices
hasn’t been taken into account in the report.

He called the report as a populist one.

Responding to that, National Assembly Speaker Arthur Baghdasaryan said:
“We shouldn’t plunge in impunity. Abuses were disclosed and those
forged papers must stand trial”.

Sorting M&Ms by color can lead to works of art

Alameda Times-Star, CA
May 9 2004

Sorting M&Ms by color can lead to works of art
By Helena Payne – ASSOCIATED PRESS

A BOSTON artist has dedicated a museum exhibit to the type of
behavior that causes some to separate their M&Ms into colors, pop
bubble wrap until there is no more plastic to crush and focus all
their attention on the most minute detail out of pure obsession.

The exhibit at the Boston Center for the Arts is called “OCD,” as in
obsessive compulsive disorder. Curator Matthew Nash said it’s not
about an illness but how the creative process can be driven by a
series of obsessions and compulsions.

“You should see my studio,” said Nash, who has shown his art in
Boston, Chicago, New York and Italy.

He is one of the people who separates his Skittles, M&Ms and Reese’s
Pieces into separate containers for each color. He used the latter
two sugary goods to create his art for the “OCD” exhibit, which lasts
through May 9 and features artists from New York, Pennsylvania and
Virginia. Using the Halloween-like colors in the candies, Nash made a
grid that forms the images of soldiers, planes and other war-related
pictures.

“The obsession of this is having bins and bins of M&Ms and hoping
when you’re done it looks like something,” Nash said.

Nancy Havlick has bins with objects separated by color, but they’re
filled with sugar eggs. In an attempt to fuse her multicultural roots
— English and Armenian — with her American upbringing, she decided
to start her own tradition.

With the sugar eggs, Havlick creates “rugs.” Make no mistake, they
aren’t to walk on.

The eggs are colored with a mixture of spices and foods often used in
Armenia, including mahleb, sumac, almonds, apricots, paprika and
rosebuds. She organizes them in decorative patterns on the floor.

“I’m deciding my own tradition. Rather than looking backwards, I’m
forging ahead,” Havlick said, laying one of the eggs in its position.

Havlick said she didn’t recognize her obsession with making sugar
eggs until she realized she has been doing it for a decade. But she
has also realized another fixation: carving out an identity from her
multiethnic past.

In her parents’ generation, Havlick said, it was much more common to
assimilate to the American culture rather than celebrate differences.
“My mother wasn’t cooking Armenian food. We were having hot dogs and
hamburgers,” she said.

The sugar eggs have become her own way of bridging the past to the
future and “to control the chaotic feelings” of life, she said.

Many of the exhibitors wanted their art to express something about
both the creation process and the result.

New York artist Jason Dean wanted to conquer bubble wrap after
working for an animation company where he did a lot of packing. So he
decided to make it an art project and see how much time it would take
for him to pop the largest roll of bubble wrap he could find: 110
feet by 4 feet. It took about six hours.

That roll and other smaller ones are mounted on a wall of the exhibit
like paper towels above a kitchen sink. There is also a video that
features Dean’s “popping spree.”

“I kept thinking that they were a lot louder,” he said. “It just
sounded like fireworks and I kept thinking that someone is going to
question this odd sound.”

Joseph Trupia, another New York artist, used office supplies to make
drawings called “What I can do in 40 hours” and “What I can do in 8
hours.”

Another work in “OCD” shows 600 photographs of rear ends.

“It was kind of a silly thing to do at first and it became a document
of the process of looking,” said Boston artist Luke Walker of his
gluteus photography.

Norfolk, Va., artist Jennifer Schmidt became fascinated with the
repetition of filling in ovals on test score sheets.

“The idea of the artwork showing evidence of repeated activity is
something we see in a lot of different forms,” said Martha Buskirk, a
fellow at the Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute in
Williamstown, Mass., and author of “The Contingent Object of
Contemporary Art.”

Media advisory: Interregional Russian-Armenian cooperation conf

ITAR-TASS News Agency
TASS
May 2, 2004 Sunday

Media advisory: Interregional Russian-Armenian cooperation conf

Russian Federation Council

Press Service

The Federation Council, or upper house of the Russian parliament,
jointly with the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia
(parliament) will hold an international conference in the city of
Samara from May 14 to May 15, 2004.

The participants in the confernece will consider the status of and
prospects for development of interergional Russian-Armenian
cooperation.

Speaker of the Federation Council Sergey Mironov and Chairman of the
National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia Atrur Bagdasarian will
open the international conference.

Representatives of Russian and foreign mass media, TV and radio
broadcasting companies are invited to attend the event.

Journalists’ accreditation requests will be accepted by the Federation
Council press service.

For more information, please call the Federation Council press service
at 292-1877, 292-7525 or 292-5604, or send your fax message to
292-4305.

For Ankara, all roads lead to Paris

For Ankara, all roads lead to Paris
France remains the only major obstacle to Turkey receiving a date for EU
accession negotiations

By Burak Bekdil

Kathimerini English Edition 4th May 2004

It was not a coincidence that British Prime Minister Tony Blair wrote
an article backing Turkey’s membership of the European Union in Le
Monde. With about half a year to go for the historic decision on
whether to give Turkey a date to start formal membership talks, France
remains the only single major obstacle.

Mr Blair argues that allowing Turkey to join the EU would help to
bridge the gap between Europe and the Islamic world. According to Mr
Blair, `Turkey will add a new dimension to the Union.’ The rhetoric
may or may not appeal to the French. But President Jacques Chirac
looks as though he is in deep doubt.

In his first press conference on Europe in six years, the French
leader said even if Turkey won a date to open membership negotiations,
it would take 10to 15 years for it to join the bloc. According to
optimists, Mr Chirac’s statement was a hidden reference to the
growing possibility of a date, which would be followed by a long
period of tough talks. According to pessimists, however, the language
reflected a deep suspicion in Paris of the idea of Turkish
membership. Both of the contrary propositions may be right.

It is true that Mr Chirac had to talk cautiously ahead of European
Parliament elections and in view of a French public still hostile to
the idea of 70 million Turks – or, rather, 80 million by the time
Turkey joins’ in the Union. A recent opinion poll showed that 70
percent of the French public oppose Turkish membership.

Men in Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s closest circle are
optimistic about a change in the French language and policy after the
European elections. They recall equally hostile German thinking a
couple of years earlier and the present `spring-like mood’ in Berlin.

All the same, skeptics warn, everything may not actually be coming up
roses with Germany. What if the Germans are ostensibly supporting
Turkish membership, knowing that the French barrier will always be
there? That way, the Germans could be hoping to make political gains
from a large Turkish community at no real cost.

According to TAM, a Turkish studies center in Essen, Germany, the
number of Turks living in the EU will reach 4.9 million by 2007,
larger than the population of eight member states put together. Last
year, EU Turks contributed 70.2 billion euros to the bloc’s GDP – a
figure 10 times larger than the GDP of Estonia and eight times larger
than that of Latvia. A microcosm of Turkey already exists in the heart
of the EU!

But that’s hardly any relief to Mr Erdogan. Last week, his government
sent to Parliament a package of constitutional amendments designed to
persuade the EU to open the entry talks which he desperately
wants. The measures include enshrining gender equality, removing
military representatives from the board which supervises higher
education and scrapping state security courts, which try political and
security-linked crimes. They would also remove residual references to
the death penalty, which Turkey has abolished in line with EU
requirements.

Turkey would also allow international agreements to take precedence
over domestic law when they came into conflict. In a further bid to
assert civilian control over the armed forces, Parliament would in
future have full controlover the military budget.

But all the reform effort in Ankara is a one-way street. If reforms
fail, Turkey will be denied access to talks. If they succeed, however,
they may not guarantee a date for Turkey. Hence, Mr Erdogan must not
only satisfy suspicious minds in Brussels but also win hearts in
several EU capitals.

The trouble is that EU leaders and public opinion still do not know
what to do about the Turks. For most of them, it’s best to keep Turkey
at adistance, though not too far. Some, like Mr Blair, argue that
Turkish membership would bring in strategic benefits. Others think
that 80 million Turks in the EU could only mean trouble.

But fractured EU thinking may find some common ground by
December. Almost all agree that denying Turkey a date will not benefit
anyone in Turkey or in the EU. It would mean disaster for Turkey’s
reformist government, a blow to transatlantic plans for the Greater
Middle East Initiative, and the countrymay drift into new unknowns.

Besides, a date, technically speaking, does not necessarily guarantee
eventual membership – although it has done so up to now. More
strategically, EU advocates for a date privately think it could work
as a catalyst to sort out other Turkey-related disputes i.e. the
Aegean, Armenian genocide claims, et cetera.

A no-date formula, on the other hand, will strengthen nationalist
elements in Turkey and naturally push Ankara into a much less
compromising position when it negotiates disputes with its neighbors.

All in all, Romano Prodi, president of the European Commission, has a
point when he says it’s time `the EU leaders should stop saying
different things to the Turks and among themselves.’

IMF completes 5th review under PRGF for Armenia…

noticias.info (press release), Spain
May 4 2004

IMF Completes Fifth Review Under PRGF for the Republic of Armenia,
Approves Request for Extension of the Arrangement Through December
2004

The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) today
completed the fifth review of the Republic of Armenia’s economic
performance under a three-year Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility
(PRGF) arrangement, and approved a request for the extension of the
arrangement by seven months to December 31, 2004. The completion of
the review enables Armenia to draw an amount equivalent to SDR 10
million (about US$15 million).

Armenia’s PRGF arrangement for the equivalent of SDR 69 million
(about US$100 million) was approved on May 21, 2001 (see Press
Release No. 01/25). So far, the equivalent of SDR 50 million (about
US$73 million) have been disbursed.

The PRGF is the IMF’s concessional facility for low-income countries.
PRGF-supported programs are based on country-owned poverty reduction
strategies adopted in a participatory process involving civil society
and development partners, and articulated in a Poverty Reduction
Strategy Paper, or PRSP. This is intended to ensure that each
PRGF-supported program is consistent with a comprehensive framework
for macroeconomic, structural, and social policies, to foster growth
and reduce poverty. PRGF loans carry an annual interest rate of 0.5
percent, and are repayable over 10 years with a 5 ½-year grace period
on principal payments.

Following the Executive Board discussion, Agustín Carstens, Deputy
Managing Director and Acting Chair, said:

“The Armenian authorities should be commended for the satisfactory
implementation of macroeconomic policies and structural measures
under the PRGF-supported program. These policies have contributed to
an improved business environment and a strong economic performance in
2003.

“Raising revenues and reforming tax and customs administration remain
critical objectives in the period immediately ahead. The recent
reduction in VAT exemptions and reform of the profit tax are welcomed
steps in this regard, but further efforts are needed to improve the
tax system and generate resources for poverty reduction. In
particular, it will be important to improve the transparency of tax
and customs operations, ensure the equal treatment of taxpayers, and
implement risk-based audit systems. Additional steps are needed in
the medium term to strengthen the overall coherence of the tax system
and the management of the tax and customs agencies.

“Recent increases in bread and utility prices pose the risk of
rekindling inflationary expectations, and the central bank will need
to maintain a tight monetary policy to bring inflation down to its
goal of 3 percent by end-2004. To further develop Armenia’s financial
system, it will be important to build capacity and promote sound
corporate governance in the banking system, and strengthen the legal
framework and the judiciary.

“The recent process of fiscal decentralization has the potential to
improve the quality and efficiency of services delivered by
state-owned noncommercial organizations in the health, water, and
education sectors. Complementary capacity building initiatives and a
properly functioning reporting framework remain essential to ensure
transparency and accountability in the operations of these entities.

“Other structural reforms will be important to sustain growth and
reduce poverty in the medium term. The anti-corruption strategy needs
to be implemented forcefully and in consultation with civil society.
The authorities are encouraged to move forward with their plans to
reform the energy and water sectors, including establishing market
rules for electricity trading, and liquidating the state-owned
company Armenergo,” Mr. Carstens said.

IMF EXTERNAL RELATIONS DEPARTMENT
Public Affairs: 202-623-7300 – Fax: 202-623-6278
Media Relations: 202-623-7100 – Fax: 202-623-6772

Announcement of the NKR government

Azat Artsakh – Republic of Nagorno Karabakh (NKR)
April 27, 2004

ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE NKR GOVERNMENT

Against the background of the recent home political developments in
the capital of the republic of Armenia certain political forces and
mass media serving them try to achieve their selfish ends through
arousing adversities between the different parts of our nation. The
NKR government refuses the manipulation of the factor of Karabakh in
the home political struggle of Armenia and is of the opinion that all
those who speak with the people in that language, “play into the hands
of the enemy”. The evidence to this is that the false rumours
circulated by the same politicians and mass media immediately spread
in the Azerbaijani mass media. In particular, the rumours that the
subdivisions of the NKR police forces led by the head of the Police
Armen Isagulov allegedly participated in the April 13 events in
Yerevan, in Baghramian Street. The NKR government states that the
mentioned rumours have nothing to do with the reality and are spread
deliberately. None of the subdivisions of the NKR police left the
territory of the republic, and the entire personnel including the head
of the police continue to function in normal order. The NKR government
considers such libeling manipulations aimed at dividing the nation
unacceptable and addresses all the political forces and
representatives of the mass media to abstain from circulation of
unverified information, which may obstruct the settlement of national
problems.

AA

System of a Down turns it up at benefit

Los Angeles Times
April 27, 2004 Tuesday
Home Edition

POP MUSIC REVIEW;
System of a Down turns it up at benefit

by Lina Lecaro, Special to The Times

The refusal of the American government to officially recognize the
Armenian genocide of 1915 continues to be a source of outrage among
Armenian Americans, the largest concentration of whom live in Los
Angeles. It’s something manic metal band System of a Down, whose
members are all of Armenian descent, has been addressing for years,
and on Saturday at the Greek Theatre, on the 89th anniversary of the
beginning of the controversial episode, the band took its fight a
step further with “Souls 2004,” a benefit concert to raise awareness
and money for the issue.

“You’re here for the music,” remarked poet Saul Williams, whose
passionate orations preceded System of a Down’s pulverizing
performance. “But there’s a message too.”

A news clip related to the genocide, projected on giant monitors
before the quartet took the stage, started System’s set off on a
somber note. But it also allowed their music to steadily surge,
beginning with a pitch-perfect rendition of its hypnotic hit
“Aerials” and building with other songs from its breakthrough release
“Toxicity” and the more recent “Steal This Album.” Singer Serj
Tankian’s rapid-fire rants, while impressive, would have been grating
without the balance of his other more soothing vocal guise, an
operatic croon that swelled with emotional reflection.

Guitarist Daron Malakian’s intricate instrumental work truly danced
with and enhanced Tankian’s singing.

System’s quirky mash of chaotic riffs and majestic, Middle
Eastern-flavored melodies manages to be boisterous and beauteous,
frantic yet languid and lush. It’s a signature style that’s even more
powerful live, and it’s one that should give the band a forum to
express its views, political or otherwise, for a long time.

Stanford: Turkey should own up to responsibility for Arm. Genocide

Turkey should own up to responsibility for Armenian genocide

Daily Stanford

By Seepan Parseghian
Guest Columnist
Friday, April 23, 2004

By SEEPAN PARSEGHIAN
Adolf Hitler said it all those years ago. The National Socialist Party
was planning one of the most horrific events of the 20th century, and
Hitler only looked back once. That moment came when one of Hitler’s
generals asked if he was afraid they would be punished for what they
were about to execute. He casually shrugged off the concern, asking in
return: `Who today remembers the annihilation of the Armenians?’ The
Jewish Holocaust ensued.

On Monday, Holocaust survivor Gloria Lyon spoke on campus as part of
Holocaust Memorial Day. Listening to Lyon share her painful experiences,
I realized that she was not only a symbol of enduring strength and
survival, but was also a product of a grossly overlooked historical
event: the Armenian genocide of 1915.

Eighty-nine years ago, the Young Turk party that was ruling the Ottoman
Empire orchestrated the first genocide of the 20th century. The Allied
powers were preoccupied with the supposed `war to end all wars.’ The
Young Turk party had ousted the last royal sovereign of the Ottoman
Empire, Sultan Abdul Hamid II, from leadership and had risen to power on
a democratic platform. After their victory, the Young Turks decided to
adopt nationalistic ideals, presenting the idea of pan-Turkism to the
Turkish citizenry.

The Armenians, already segregated from the Turkish population in millets
(religious communities), were an obstacle to the formation of a
pan-Turkish nation. They became the victims of severe oppression and
bigotry, according to American officials who were present in Turkey at
the time. Without a democracy protecting them, the Armenians were left
defenseless under the dictatorial swords of leaders who wanted to rid
the empire of them. Behind the smokescreen of World War I, the Young
Turk leaders Talaat, Enver and Cemal Pasha saw an opportunity to do so,
and so carried out the extermination of 1.5 million Armenians under the
cloak of deportation.

There to witness the Armenian genocide unfolding were U.S. Ambassador to
the Ottoman Empire Henry Morgenthau and U.S. Consul in Harput, Turkey,
Leslie Davis. Both Morgenthau, a graduate of Columbia Law School, and
Leslie Davis, a famous American humanitarian, observed firsthand the
systematic murder of the Armenian race in 1915.

In his memoirs that were later published as `Ambassador Morgenthau’s
Story,’ Morgenthau noted, `When the Turkish authorities gave the orders
for these deportations, they were merely giving the death warrant to a
whole race; they understood this well, and, in their conversations with
me, they made no particular attempt to conceal the fact.’ In `The
Slaughterhouse Province,’ Davis reported the disappearance of the
prominent figures of the Armenian community in Harput on June 23, 1915.
After prodding Turkish soldiers with inquiries of the whereabouts of
these Armenian leaders, Davis was told that they had been rounded up and
taken to a desolate location to be `done away with.’ Left without
leadership and manpower, the Armenian elders, women and children of
Harput were deported three days later to the Syrian Desert, where they
were tortured. Davis’ description of these tortures is too graphic to be
included in this op-ed.

The Turkish government denies that the Armenian genocide ever occurred.
Not only does it deny the historical facts surrounding this systematic
massacre, but it has also taken extensive steps to manipulate those
facts into historical fallacies. Discrediting the personal memoirs of
educated American foreign servicemen like Morgenthau and Davis has been
a financially and politically strenuous task for the Turkish government
to accomplish. It has provided millions of dollars to American scholars
like Princeton Prof. Bernard Lewis, University of Louisville Prof.
Justin McCarthy and UCLA Prof. Heath Lowry, who discredit scholarship of
the Armenian genocide.

Further, Turkey has extensively lobbied in Washington to suppress
American recognition of the genocide. As The Washington Post reported in
Oct. 2000, for example, when House Resolution 596 – a bill seeking
American recognition of the Armenian genocide – was on the Congressional
floor, the Turkish government immediately threatened to pull out of a
$4.5 billion deal in which it would purchase 145 advanced Bell-Textron
attack helicopters from the United States. House Res. 596 failed.

Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert told The Washington Post that the
resolution `would have enjoyed support among the majority of the house.’
The U.S. government has yet to officially recognize the Armenian
genocide. The gunsmoke of World War I hid the genocide of the Armenians
from the world, and today a thick cloud of political and social
malpractice by the Turkish regime has reached the same effect.

The government of Turkey must take responsibility for its 1915 crimes
against humanity, not only for humanity’s sake, but for its own future
as well. As Turkish historian Taner Akcam, now at the University of
Minnesota, states, `If and when the government of Turkey acknowledges
its past wrongs and recognizes the Armenian genocide, it well then be
able to ensure a democratic future.’

Had the Turkish regime done so in 1915 and paid the according price in
reparations and compensation, Hitler would have taken the annihilation
of the Armenians into account, and would have been forced to at least
reconsider carrying out his Final Solution. Lyon could possibly have
spoken not of Auschwitz and Bergen-Belsen on Monday, but of the
prosperity of the European Jews during the World War II era.

Tomorrow, on the 89th anniversary of the Armenian genocide, it is time
for Turkey to recognize the wrongs of carrying out the Armenian
genocide, in order to restore the progression of its own societal
development. This will convincingly allow Turkey to encourage the
advancement of human culture and morality.

Seepan Parseghian is a freshman. You can send him your questions and
comments to [email protected].

Deputy commander of US forces in Europe goes to Armenia

ITAR-TASS, Russia
April 25 2004

Deputy commander of US forces in Europe goes to Armenia

YEREVAN, April 25 (Itar-Tass) – The deputy commander of U.S. forces
in Europe, Charles Wald, arrives in Armenia on Sunday for the second
time since November 2003.

The agenda of talks with the American general has not yet been
announced, but it is expected that the talks will focus on Armenia’s
cooperation with NATO within the framework of the partnership program
as well as on bilateral military ties.

Sources from the information department of the Armenian Defence
Ministry told Tass that Charles Wald will meet with Armenia’s Defence
Minister Serzh Sarkisyan and Chief of General Staff of Armenian Armed
Forces, Mikhail Arutyunyan.

The top guest is expected to meet with Armenian graduates from the
George Marshall European Centre for Security Studies, which the USA
set up in Germany.