President Serzh Sargsyan Visited The Home-Museum Of Avetik Isahakian

PRESIDENT SERZH SARGSYAN VISITED THE HOME-MUSEUM OF AVETIK ISAHAKIAN IN YEREVAN

president.am
Dec 2 2009
Armenia

Today, President Serzh Sargsyan visited the Home-Museum of Avetik
Isahakian in Yerevan.

Accompanied by the grandson of Maestro, Avik Isahakian, the President
of Armenia toured the premise, familiarized with the exhibits related
to the life and creative works of the great poet.

Serzh Sargsyan conversed with the keepers of the Museum and inquired
on the number of the visitors. The keepers assured the President
of Armenia that visitors come often, and many among them are
schoolchildren, young people, and foreign tourists.

President Sargsyan said that he was impressed with the fundamentally
renovated Museum and noted that it would be constantly attended to.

The Museum of Avetic Ishakian was renovated through the funds provided
by Armenia’s social fund.

OSCE Observes The Armenia-Azerbaijan Border

OSCE OBSERVES THE ARMENIA-AZERBAIJAN BORDER

Aysor
Dec 3 2009
Armenia

In accordance with the preliminary agreement between OSCE and
authorities of Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, the Armenia-Azerbaijan
border, at northern region of the Talish locality of Martakert region
of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, has been explored today, December 3.

Armenian delegation was represented by officials of Foreign and
Defense Ministries of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic. A monitoring group
involved field assistants of the OSCE chairman-in-office Peter Keane
(UK), Irji Aberlen (Czech Republic), and Vladimir Chuntulov (Bulgaria).

During the observations neither ceasefire violation was registered.

Ruben Safrastian: Nagorno Karabakh Conflict Sides Are Not Ready Yet

RUBEN SAFRASTIAN: NAGORNO KARABAKH CONFLICT SIDES ARE NOT READY YET FOR PROBLEM’S FINAL SOLUTION

Noyan Tapan
Dec 2, 2009

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 2, NOYAN TAPAN. World’s political centers share
Armenia’s approach that the normalization of the Armenian-Turkish
relations should not be identified with the Nagorno Karabakh problem.

Director of the Oriental Studies Institute of the RA National Academy
of Sciences, Turkologist Ruben Safrastian expressed such an opinion
at a December 2 press conference. In his words, the big states do
not meet Turkey’s wish, at any price to link with one another the
processes of Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement and normalization of
Armenian-Turkish relations. R. Safrastian added that if the Turkish
parliament tries to delay the ratification of the Armenian-Turkish
protocols, Turkey will be perceived as a not serious political partner
on the international arena.

Touching upon the negotiations over the Nagorno Karabakh conflict the
Turkologist expressed an opinion that the sides are not ready yet for
problem’s final settlement. "It will take some time for the solution
to mature. To move to the settlement now will mean to aggravate the
situation which is not beneficial to anyone," he mentioned. According
to R. Safrastian’s prediction, a framework agreement will be signed
only when the sides clarify the Nagorno Karabakh status.

Agreement On CSTO Member States’ Special Services Training Enters In

AGREEMENT ON CSTO MEMBER STATES’ SPECIAL SERVICES TRAINING ENTERS INTO FORCE

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
02.12.2009 20:16 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The agreement on professional training for the
law-enforcement, fire-prevention, rescue bodies and special services
of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) member states
entered into force.

The agreement was signed in Moscow on September 5, 2008 with a view of
forming and developing a comprehensive system for personnel training
in these areas within the CSTO framework. The agreement provides for
fee training of personnel at the expense of the customer country on
preferential and general terms using quotas set by the host country.

Financial support and other kinds of support during the training are
provided in line with contracts.

The agreement determines procedures for personnel training, selection
of candidates, and provision of study guides as aid for developing
national educational institutions.

The sides are mutually obliged to recognize the equality of education
certificates and academic degree certificates issued by the host
country.

One Of The Biggest Importers Of Armenia Assures Provision Of State B

ONE OF THE BIGGEST IMPORTERS OF ARMENIA ASSURES PROVISION OF STATE BUDGET WITH $5 MLN A YEAR BY ITS OWN PRODUCTION

ArmInfo
2009-12-01 15:54:00

ArmInfo. Today, Prime Minister of Armenia Tigran Sarkisyan visited
the Original Distillery Company, a vodka distillery, opened 4 months
ago by Sovrano Company, one of the biggest food and alcohol importers
in Armenia.

The prime minister surveyed the distillery company, got acquainted
with the production and talked to the company management. As Chairman
of the Board of Sovrano Company Sos Sahakyan said, after he meeting of
Armenia’s PM with big importers in February, 2009, the Company decided
to follow the government’s call and open its own production. "We have
selected a plant which did not work for one and half decades, and
founded a modern production on its basis. We invited technologists from
Russia and Ukraine, and we want to assure a proper product quality. The
vodka is made of the Ukrainian spirits and Armenian water", S. Sahakyan
said. He added that 80 jobs have already been opened in the Company.

According to T. Sarkisyan, the meeting held with big importers in
February, 2009, starts giving positive results. "You see that the new
production, organized during the last 4 months, was the importers’
response to the government’s call to open own productions", the PM
said. First, the import volumes reduce and the own production is
created. 80 jobs have been opened, and this number will reach 200
with the production extension. Second, the competition in the market
will naturally lead to improvement of the vodka quality, that will
positively affect our citizens’ health. Third, the company is going to
export the vodka, and not only to the neighbouring countries but also
to Russia and Ukraine. To assure competitiveness in these markets,
the quality requirement should be high, T. Sarkisyan said. According
to him, there are many industries in Armenia, where one may refuse
of the import and organize its own production which will not yield to
the import in quality. However, it s necessary to keep the quality",
T. Sarkisyan said.

After One Hundred Years, The ‘Sultanate’ Remembers Its Arab Neighbor

AFTER ONE HUNDRED YEARS, THE ‘SULTANATE’ REMEMBERS ITS ARAB NEIGHBORHOOD ANKARA USES ITS REGIONAL CREDIT TO KNOCK AT THE GATE OF THE EUROPEAN ‘CITADEL’

Monday Morning

Nov 30 2009
Lebanon

Analyses and commentary in newspapers published in Paris, London and
Berlin on the "awakening" of the Turkish role in the Middle East. Most
of these comments note the linkage between this revival of Turkish
interest in its neighboring region with the barriers put up against
its adhesion to the European Union. There is no doubt that this reason
is part of the explanation, but it does not fully explain the U-turn
of the power now knocking at the gates of the European citadel. At the
head of these causes is the rivalry between the Islamist party in power
and the secularist military establishment set up by Ataturk, which
wants to tame the Kurds in Northern Iraq and crush them militarily
before making a transaction with them.

The Turkish game may seem "surrealistic", according to the French
researcher Elisabeth Picard, who has devoted a large part of her
study and travels to deciphering Turkish policy, beginning with the
"peace of the pipelines". And the American researcher Joyce Starr,
who tries to dissect the present tense relationship between Ankara
and Tel Aviv after they signed a strategic pact in 1996.

It is necessary here to recognize that Israeli support for Ankara in
the field of intelligence has not changed much in the equation on the
ground. The Kurdish rebels are developing their methods, inflicting
big losses on the Turkish forces and the village guards. And the
fundamentalist danger exists on the Turkish internal front. That is why
a force of a million men has been deployed to confront terrorism and
the circle of fire surrounding Turkey. The Turkish general staff has
announced that measures to reduce the duration of compulsory military
service and renovating the armed forces were a mistake. The statements
by the generals have coincided with an outbreak of violence. Analysts
consider this a sort of effective mobilization against 10,000 Kurdish
rebels and 400,000 partisans in Southeast Anatolia. In the same way,
the Turkish intelligence service has for the first time been tasked
with undertaking external operations to arrest suspects, especially of
the Kurdish movement, in addition to persons residing in Athens and
Moscow. Ankara has accused these two capitals of training members of
the Kurdish Workers’ Party (PKK) of Abdallah Ocalan and financing
their activities. We recall that Moscow hosted a PKK conference
attended by Kurds from a number of countries.

The deadlock is clear and the fundamentalist fire has reached the
interior. In a recent report of the Turkish intelligence agency,
it is stated that extremists have succeeded in infiltrating all the
state services and the security forces, and that they possess sources
of finance. More dangerous still is the fact that extremists have
penetrated the army and the intelligence services. It is a fact that
all presidents of the Turkish Republic have been military officers
except Celal Bayar, Turgut Ozal and the present incumbent, Abdallah
Gul. The renovation of the armed forces recalls the movement of
"reforms", which goes back to 1938. The army has always been the
guarantor and guardian of Ataturk’s secular legacy. But the earth has
moved under the feet of the Ataturkists. The Justice and Development
Party has registered precious points in the camp of the generals.

In his stop in Istanbul, President Obama posed the question of a
partnership between East and West, between Christendom and Islam,
and told a mixed group of religious figures who wanted to show the
tolerant face of Islam and of the Justice and Development Party:
"Islam is not America’s enemy, nor are Americans the enemies of
Islam". This stance was magnificent and historic. It was a crucial
statement in the process of rebuilding Islam and of reaching concord
among civilizations, societies and religions. But the problem lies
in Turkey, not in Paris, London or Washington. It lies in ignorance
and fanaticism, and in assassinations which have even struck down
priests in Anatolia. It lies also in ignoring the Armenian genocide
and the fundamental rights of the Kurds.

History is preferable to geography for the reading of the Turkish
situation, be it by infra-red or ultra-violet. Mustafa Kamal Ataturk
seized power from the sultans in the 1920s. But now, 80 years on,
Necmettin Erbakan introduced fundamentalism into the institutions
of secular power. He was followed by Recep Tayyip Erdogan, another
Islamist. The result has been a kind of schizophrenia, with duality
in all sectors, raising questions like the relationship between
Asia and Europe, Islam and secularism, Pan-Turanianism, Kurdism,
not to mention the headscarf. These questions have origins going
back not to the advent of the Gul-Erdogan duo but to the foundation
of the Republic in 1923. Marc Simon wrote in Libération: "Without
Mustafa Kamal, the Taliban would be on the shores of the Bosphorus,
and there would be no dancing of the waltz in Istanbul". The nub of
the matter is therefore in Turkey, nowhere else, in the hands of both
the military men and the clerics.

There is no doubt that the Justice and Development Party is in a
strange situation regarding the relationship between democracy and
fundamentalism. Is there a contradiction between Islam and democratic
governance? It is a conundrum that goes back to Ataturk.

The Democratic Party also has much to answer for, in view of its
laxity in the 1950s, when it allowed fundamentalism to return to
public life, and that has led to the present situation, which is like
a growing fireball.

http://www.mmorning.com/default.asp

South Caucasus Railways And GeoProMining Sign Agreement On Strategic

SOUTH CAUCASUS RAILWAYS AND GEOPROMINING SIGN AGREEMENT ON STRATEGIC COOPERATION

Noyan Tapan
Dec 1, 2009

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 1, NOYAN TAPAN. South Caucasus Railways CJSC and
GeoProMining Ltd. signed an agreement on strategic cooperation and
partnership on December 1. The agreement regulates the relations
of the sides with respect to transport services for transporting
gold ore from the Sotk mine to the Ararat gold processing plant on
mutually beneficial conditions. The transport services are provided
to GeoProMining.

According to the press service of South Caucasus Railways,
GeoProMining Ltd. and South Caucasus Railways CJSC are conducting
negotiations regarding an increase in transportation voulmes of gold
ore from the Sotk mine to the Ararat plant. It is expected that South
Caucasus Railways will make additional investments to increase the
Sotk-Vardenis-Hrazdan-Ararat section’s capacity to 1.5-2 million tons
of ore a year.

South Caucasus Railways CJSC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Russian
Railways OJSC. South Caucasus Railways CJSC manages Armenian Railways
CJSC under a concession agreement signed on 13 February 2008. The
concession agreement was signed for 30 years, with a right of extension
for 10 years.

GeoProMining is an international privately-owned diversified metals
resource holding company, with a portfolio of exploration and mining
projects. The company was founded in 2001 and is focusing on gold,
silver, copper, molybdenum, antimony, and other metals. The company
is engaged in metal mining in Russia, Armenia, and Georgia. Among
its major assets in Armenia are the Sotk gold mine, the Ararat gold
processing plant and the Agarak copper and molybdenum enterprise.

Mouths filled with hatred. this is unacceptable

Mouths filled with hatred
Nov. 26, 2009
Larry Derfner , THE JERUSALEM POST
Father Samuel Aghoyan, a senior Armenian Orthodox cleric in
Jerusalem’s Old City, says he’s been spat at by young haredi and
national Orthodox Jews "about 15 to 20 times" in the past decade. The
last time it happened, he said, was earlier this month. "I was walking
back from the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and I saw this boy in a
yarmulke and ritual fringes coming back from the Western Wall, and he
spat at me two or three times."
Wearing a dark-blue robe, sitting in St. James’s Church, the main
Armenian church in the Old City, Aghoyan said, "Every single priest in
this church has been spat on. It happens day and night."
Father Athanasius, a Texas-born Franciscan monk who heads the
Christian Information Center inside the Jaffa Gate, said he’s been
spat at by haredi and national Orthodox Jews "about 15 times in the
last six months" – not only in the Old City, but also on Rehov Agron
near the Franciscan friary. "One time a bunch of kids spat at me,
another time a little girl spat at me," said the brown-robed monk near
the Jaffa Gate.
"All 15 monks at our friary have been spat at," he said. "Every
[Christian cleric in the Old City] who’s been here for awhile, who
dresses in robes in public, has a story to tell about being spat
at. The more you get around, the more it happens."
A nun in her 60s who’s lived in an east Jerusalem convent for decades
says she was spat at for the first time by a haredi man on Rehov Agron
about 25 years ago. "As I was walking past, he spat on the ground
right next to my shoes and he gave me a look of contempt," said the
black-robed nun, sitting inside the convent. "It took me a moment, but
then I understood." Since then, the nun, who didn’t want to be
identified, recalls being spat at three different times by young
national Orthodox Jews on Jaffa Road, three different times by haredi
youth near Mea She’arim and once by a young Jewish woman from her
second-story window in the Old City’s Jewish Quarter.
But the spitting incidents weren’t the worst, she said – the worst was
the time she was walking down Jaffa Road and a group of middle-aged
haredi men coming her way pointed wordlessly to the curb, motioning
her to move off the sidewalk to let them pass, which she did.
"That made me terribly sad," said the nun, speaking in ulpan-trained
Hebrew. Taking personal responsibility for the history of Christian
anti-Semitism, she said that in her native European country, such
behavior "was the kind of thing that they – no, that we used to do to
Jews."
News stories about young Jewish bigots in the Old City spitting on
Christian clergy – who make conspicuous targets in their long dark
robes and crucifix symbols around their necks – surface in the media
every few years or so. It’s natural, then, to conclude that such
incidents are rare, but in fact they are habitual. Anti-Christian
Orthodox Jews, overwhelmingly boys and young men, have been spitting
with regularity on priests and nuns in the Old City for about 20
years, and the problem is only getting worse. "My impression is that
Christian clergymen are being spat at in the Old City virtually every
day. This has been constantly increasing over the last decade," said
Daniel Rossing. An observant, kippa-wearing Jew, Rossing heads the
Jerusalem Center for Jewish-Christian Relations and was liaison to
Israel’s Christian communities for the Ministry of Religious Affairs
in the ’70s and ’80s.
For Christian clergy in the Old City, being spat at by Jewish fanatics
"is a part of life," said the American Jewish Committee’s Rabbi David
Rosen, Israel’s most prominent Jewish interfaith activist.
"I hate to say it, but we’ve grown accustomed to this. Jewish
religious fanatics spitting at Christian priests and nuns has become a
tradition," said Roman Catholic Father Massimo Pazzini, sitting inside
the Church of the Flagellation on the Via Dolorosa.
These are the very opposite of isolated incidents. Father Athanasius
of the Christian Information Center called them a "phenomenon." George
Hintlian, the unofficial spokesman for the local Armenian community
and former secretary of the Armenian Patriarchate, said it was "like a
campaign."
Christians in Israel are a small, weak community known for "turning
the other cheek," so these Jewish xenophobes feel free to spit on
them; they don’t spit on Muslims in the Old City because they’re
afraid to, the clerics noted.
THE ONLY Israeli authority who has shown any serious concern over this
matter, the one high official whom Christian and Jewish interfaith
activists credit for stepping into the fray, is Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi
Yona Metzger.
On November 11, Metzger addressed a letter to the "rabbis of the
Jewish Quarter," writing that he had "heard a grave rumor about
yeshiva students offending heaven=80¦[by] spitting on Christian clergy
who walk about the Old City of Jerusalem." Such attackers, he added,
are almost tantamount to rodfim, or persecutors, which is one of the
worst class of offenders in Jewish law. They violate the injunction to
follow the "pathways of peace," Metzger wrote, and are liable to
provoke anti-Semitism overseas.
"I thus issue the fervent call to root out this evil affliction from
our midst, and the sooner the better," wrote the chief rabbi.
Metzger published the letter in response to an appeal from Armenian
Archbishop Nourhan Manougian, an appeal that came in the wake of a
September 5 incident in the Old City in which a haredi man spat on a
group of Armenian seminarians who, in turn, beat him up. (See box.)
This is not the first time Metzger has spoken out against the spitting
– he did so five years ago after the most infamous incident on record,
when Manougian himself was spat on by an Old City yeshiva student
during an Armenian Orthodox procession. In response, the archbishop
slapped the student’s face, and then the student tore the porcelain
ceremonial crucifix off Manougian’s neck and threw it to the ground,
breaking it.
Then interior minister Avraham Poraz called the assault on the
archbishop "repulsive" and called for a police crackdown on
anti-Christian attacks in the Old City. Police reportedly punished the
student by banning him from the Old City for 75 days.
Seated in his study in the Armenian Quarter, Manougian, 61, said that
while he personally has not been assaulted since that time, the
spitting attacks on other Armenian clergy have escalated.
"The latest thing is for them to spit when they pass [St. James’s]
monastery. I’ve seen it myself a couple of times," he said. "Then
there’s the boy from the Jewish Quarter who spits at the Armenian
women when he sees them wearing their crosses, then he runs away. And
during one of our processions from the Church of the Holy Sepulchre
this year, a fellow in a yarmulke and fringes began deliberately
cutting through our lines, over and over. The police caught him and he
started yelling, ‘I’m free to walk wherever I want!’ That’s what these
settler types are always saying: ‘This is our country and we can do
whatever we want!’"
Where are the police in all this? If they happen to be on the scene,
such as at the recent procession Manougian described, they will chase
the hooligans – but even if they catch them, they only tell them off
and let them go, according to several Christian clergymen.
"The police tell us to catch them and bring them in, but then they
tell us not to use violence, so how are we supposed to catch them?"
asked Aghoyan, a very fit-looking 68-year-old. "Once a boy came up to
me and spat in my face, and I punched him and knocked him down, and an
Armenian seminarian and I brought him to the police station [next to
the Armenian Quarter]. They released him in a couple of hours. I’ve
made many, complaints to the police, I’m tired of it. Nothing ever
gets done."
Said Rosen, "The police say, ‘Show us the evidence.’ They want the
Christians to photograph the people spitting at them so they can make
arrests, but this is very unrealistic – by the time you get the camera
out, the attack is over and there’s nothing to photograph."
Victims of these attacks say that in the great majority of cases the
assailants do not spit in their faces or on their clothes, but on the
ground at their feet. "When we complain about this, the police tell
us, ‘But they’re not spitting on you, just near you,’" said Manougian.
Sitting inside the Church of the Flagellation on the Via Dolorosa,
Pazzini recalled: "Early this year there were about 100 Orthodox
Jewish boys who came past the church singing and dancing. The police
were with them – I don’t know what the occasion was, maybe it was a
holiday, maybe it had to do with the elections. There was a group of
Franciscan monks standing in front of the church, and a few of the
Jewish boys went up to the monks, spat on them, then went back into
the crowd. I went up to a policeman and he told me, ‘Sorry about that,
but look, they’re just kids.’"
Jerusalem police spokesman Shmuel Ben-Ruby refused to provide an
official comment on the situation on behalf of the Old City police
station. "We don’t give interviews on relations between Jews and
Christians in the Old City," he said. "We’re not sociologists, we’re
policemen."
The Jerusalem municipality likewise refused to be interviewed. "We
have not received any complaints about this matter and we do not deal
with things of this nature," said assistant city spokesman Yossi
Gottesman.
EVERY CHRISTIAN cleric interviewed for this article stressed that they
weren’t blaming Israeli Jewry as a whole for the spitting attacks; on
the contrary, they said their general reception by Israeli Jews, both
secular and religious, was one of welcome.
"I keep in mind that for every person here who’s spat at me, there are
many more who’ve come up and said hello," said Father Athanasius.
"I studied at Hebrew University for seven years and the atmosphere was
wonderful. I made a lot of friends there," said Pazzini.
"My class members at ulpan visited our convent, they couldn’t have
been more warm and friendly," said the nun in east Jerusalem. She
recalled that a group of boys in a schoolyard near the ulpan once
threw stones at her and another nun, and two ulpan teachers saw it,
became outraged and went straight into the school principal’s
office. "The kids never threw stones at us again," the nun said.
"I don’t want to cause troubles for Israel – I love Am Yisrael," said
Manougian, adding that he felt completely unthreatened and at ease
when visiting Tel Aviv, Haifa and other parts of the country. The
problem of belligerent Orthodox Jews spitting at Christian clergy,
added Rossing, is evidently confined to Jerusalem.
There was a time when priests and nuns in the capital went virtually
unmolested. In the first 20 years or so after Israel conquered the Old
City in the 1967 Six Day War, spitting incidents did occur, but only
once in a very long while. Old City police would lock the offender up
for the night, which proved an effective deterrent, said
Hintlian. "Whatever problem we had, we could call [mayor] Teddy
Kollek’s office, we could call people in the Foreign Ministry, the
Interior Ministry, we could call Israeli ambassadors. In those days,
Christians in Jerusalem were ‘overprivileged,’" he said.
That era of good feelings came about as a result of two circumstances,
continued Hintlian, the leading chronicler of Jerusalem’s Armenian
history. For one, he says, Israel in general and Jerusalem in
particular were much more liberal in those days, and secondly, Israeli
authorities were out to convince the Christian world that they could
be trusted with their newly acquired stewardship over the Old City’s
holy places.
"Now Israel doesn’t need the world’s approval anymore for its
sovereignty over Jerusalem, so our role is finished," said
Hintlian. "Now we don’t have anyone in authority to turn to."
Yisca Harani, a veteran Jewish interfaith activist who lectures on
Christianity to Israeli tour guides at Touro College, likewise says
the change for the worse came about 20 years ago. She blames the
spitting attacks on the view of Christianity that’s propagated at
haredi and national Orthodox yeshivot.
"I move around the Old City a lot," she said, "I come in contact with
these people, and what they learn in these fundamentalist yeshivot is
that the goy is the enemy, a hater of Israel. All they learn about
Christianity is the Holocaust, pogroms, anti-Semitism."
Rosen recalls that in 1994, after Israel and the Vatican opened
diplomatic relations, he organized an international Jewish-Christian
conference in Jerusalem, "and the city’s chief rabbi called me in and
said, ‘How can you do this? Don’t you know it’s forbidden for us? How
can you encourage these people to meet with us?’
"He told me that when he sees a Christian clergyman, he crosses the
street and recites, ‘You shall totally abhor and totally disdain=80¦’
This is a biblical verse that refers to idolatry." Rosen noted that
the Jerusalem chief rabbi of the time, like the more insular Orthodox
Jews in general, considered Christians to be idolators.
The people doing the spitting, according to all the Christian victims
and Jewish interfaith activists interviewed, are invariably national
Orthodox or haredi Jews; in every attack described by Christian
clerics, the assailant was wearing a kippa.
The great majority of the attackers were teenage boys and men in their
20s. However, the supposition was that they came not only from the Old
City yeshivot but also from outside. Hintlian and Aghoyan noted that
the spitting attacks tended to spike on Fridays and Saturdays, when
masses of Orthodox Jews stream to the Western Wall.
The hot spots in the Old City are the places where resident Orthodox
Jews and Christians brush up against one another – inside Jaffa Gate,
on the roads leading through the Armenian Quarter to the Jewish
Quarter and around Mount Zion, which lies just outside the Old City
and is the site of a several yeshivot.
Of all Old City Christians, the Armenians get spat on most frequently
because their quarter stands closest to those hot spots.
Near Mount Zion, four teenage boys on their way to the Diaspora
Yeshiva affirmed with a nod that they knew about the spitting attacks
on Christian clergy. "But it’s nobody from our yeshiva," said one boy,
16, who noted that he’d seen it happen twice right around there – once
by a boy wearing a crocheted kippa and once by a boy without a
kippa. (This was the only mention I heard of a secular Jew spitting on
a Christian.)
"We’re against it because it’s a desecration – it gives religious Jews
a bad name," said the boy. He added, however, "Inside, I also feel
like spitting on the Christians because everybody knows how they
preach against the Jews. But I’d never do it."
ONLY A TINY proportion of the spitting incidents are reported to
police. "When somebody spits at our feet, or at the door to the
monastery, we don’t even pay attention to it anymore, we take it for
granted," said Aghoyan. We have no suspect or evidence to give the
police, nor any reason to think the police care, he said.
Pazzini, the vice dean of the seminary at the Church of the
Flagellation, said the dean of the seminary had his face spat upon,
but he rejected Pazzini’s urgings to file a police complaint. "He told
me, ‘There’s no point, this is the way things are around here,’"
Pazzini said.
Even outrageous incidents, one after another, go unreported to the
police and unknown to the public. About a month ago, when a senior
Greek Orthodox bishop was driving into the Jaffa Gate, a young Jewish
man motioned him to roll down his window, and when he did, the young
man spat in the bishop’s face, said Hintlian.
Father Athanasius says that about a year ago, he witnessed the
archbishop of Milan, which is one of the world’s largest Roman
Catholic dioceses, get spat at in the Old City. "The archbishop was
with another Italian bishop and a group of pilgrims, and a class of
about a dozen adolescent boys in crocheted kippot and sidecurls came
by with their teacher. They stopped in front of the archbishop and his
guests, the boys began spitting at the ground next to their feet, and
then they just kept walking like this was normal," said Father
Athanasius. "I saw this with my own eyes."
Rosen, Rossing and Hintlian say the most frustrating thing is that
there’s no longer anyone in authority who’s ready to try to solve this
problem, and the reason is that the Christian community in Israel is
too small and powerless to rate high-level attention anymore.
"In the old days there were ministers and a mayor in Jerusalem who
took the Christian minority seriously, but now virtually everyone
dealing with them is a third-tier official, and while these
individuals may have wonderful intentions, they have no authority,"
said Rosen. As far as the current cabinet ministers go, he said the
phenomenon of Orthodox Jews spitting on Christian clergy "is at most
distressing to some of them, while there are other ministers whose
attitude toward non-Jews in general is downright deplorable."
Among Christian victims and Jewish interfaith activists alike, the
consensus is that two steps are needed to stop the spitting
attacks. One, of course, would be much stronger law enforcement by
police. The other would be an educational effort against this
"campaign," this "phenomenon," this "tradition" – although it may be
that there’s nothing to teach – that a person, even an adolescent,
either knows it’s wrong to spit on priests and nuns or he
doesn’t.
"We can’t tell the Jews in this country what to do – they have to see
this as an offense," said Father Athanasius. "There’s only a small
part of the population that’s doing it, but the Jewish establishment
has to bring them under control."

This article can also be read at 31077244&pagename=3DJPArticle%2FShowFull
[ Back to the Article ]
Copyright 1995- 2009 The Jerusalem Post –

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=3D12592
http://www.jpost.com/

BAKU: Uzeir Jafarov: Today Azerbaijani Army Is Ready To Liberate Its

UZEIR JAFAROV: TODAY AZERBAIJANI ARMY IS READY TO LIBERATE ITS LANDS
Leyla Tagiyeva

news.az
Nov 26 2009
Azerbaijan

Uzeir Jafarov News.Az interview with military expert Uzeir Jafarov.

Before the Munich round of talks with his Armenian counterpart,
Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev stated the possibility of a new
war to resolve the conflict. Do you think Azerbaijan is ready for
such a way to settle the problem?

This is a power of a president to make such statements as a supreme
commander, as person who is responsible for the territorial integrity
and security of the country. I perceive it calmly and normally
considering the fact that the negotiation process over Karabakh
has been ineffective for long years. Armenia attempts to protract
the conflict settlement and when it comes to agree on some important
moments, Armenian side makes up some reasons or sets some impracticable
provisions. I consider that the Azerbaijani side should put stiff
demands before the OSCE Minsk Group and the Armenian side that if
the negotiation process is not effective, we have a moral and legal
right to use the forced way of the conflict settlement. Our army is
not the same as it was in the 1990s. Today Azerbaijan has human and
material resources to ensure its territorial integrity.

How do you assess the state of the Armenian army?

It would be incorrect to say that Armenia has no army at all because
it knows that it is an aggressor and the time of revenge will come
when Azerbaijan will be able to use the forced way of this problem
settlement. Therefore, Armenia takes this into account. It understands
that the Azerbaijani army can settle this issue by any way. We are
really able to settle this issue. I am among those who criticize some
problems and shortcomings in our army, but I think today our army is
able to settle most issues. But we should not forget that the Armenian
army also does not stay idle. They have their plans to resist attacks.

We have never had real hostilities. We should take into account all
moments before taking a decision to launch hostilities. Such powerful
country as the United States faced no special problems in invading
Iraq. But it has been bearing losses every day since that period. Or
such powerful country as Russia also cannot settle the problem related
to the so-called illegal armed formations in the North Caucasus.

Therefore, we should not forget that the Armenian side also has
powers even insignificant. They have legal and illegal armament and
technique. It is no accident that the Armenian leadership and military
command have recently held a session with the military command of
the so-called "NKR". The officers have many problems and they face
great social difficulties. Meanwhile, the Armenian state budget for
2010 envisions a great amount – about $100 – 200 mln. This is too
high for the Armenian budget. Armenian officers understand that if
not for the so-called "Karabakh army", these funds could have been
used to improve social conditions of the Armenian officers.

Considering the fact that the Russian military base is dislocated
in Armenia, is it possible to say that it may be involved into the
conflict?

Russia will not risk the way it did in the early 1990s when the 366th
division led by cut-throat Yuri Zarvigorov committed massacres against
residents of Azerbaijani Khojaly. We should not forget that the 102nd
military base dislocated in Gumri is 70% comprised of the Armenian
ethnic that are the citizens of Russia. Anyway, they are of Armenian
origin but they may take even an indirect participation in case
hostilities are launched. But I can also say that the key to solution
of the Karabakh problem is in Russia. Considering the fact that Russia
always viewed Armenia as its closest ally and strategic partner and
these countries sign documents of military and political and military
and technical nature, perhaps, Russia will support Armenia in any way.

Our occupied lands would be released in a week if Russia orders so.

Armenia has no power and will to hold our native lands under occupation
for so much time.

How much time will the full liberation of lands take in case Azerbaijan
decides to liberate its lands by way of force, attaining Russia’s
guarantees of non-interference?

I don’t want to call terms. But I would like to note that our human
and material resources are sufficient to liberate our lands within a
definite period of time. We do not claim for a centimeter of someone’s
land. We need to restore our territorial integrity. This right is
fixed in four resolutions of the UN Security Council. We have a legal
and moral right to restore our territorial integrity. Certainly,
we should not forget Russia’s factor, it will hardly stay aside in
case military actions are launched. But Russia should also not forget
about international law according to which the territorial integrity
should be respected.

In the same statement President Aliyev said the contact line of the
armed forces is weakening from the Armenian side in the light of the
mass migration of population from this country. Will this factor give
real advantages to the Azerbaijani side?

In 2001 we, as part of a group of international journalists from the
OSCE, visited Armenia and spoke to simple Armenians at Yerevan’s
streets and, frankly speaking, native Armenians have no special
intentions about Karabakh. They openly resent over the fact that
Armenia is now led by Karabakh natives and people who came to
power due to the Karabakh war. They understand that time will come
to revenge and they will have to respond before the people and the
world community and, especially Azerbaijan, whose 20% lands are under
occupation now. We heard from the Armenian citizens that they do not
need Karabakh at all but the smeary policy of separatists and leaders
and persons escalating tensions in the region played its role here.

This is a business of arms, drugs, preparation of international
terrorists for them. The uncontrolled areas have always been a
favorable ground for development of such elements. I think serious
situation is growing in Armenia. And I fear the only thing. When the
settlement of the Karabakh problem was nearing a final part, there was
mass shooting in the Armenian parliament. And I am afraid something
similar may happen and Armenia may say it has internal problems and
needs time to stabilize the situation.

2nd Annual Pharmaceutical Competitiveness Conference To Take Place I

2ND ANNUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPETITIVENESS CONFERENCE TO TAKE PLACE IN YEREVAN

armradio.am
27.11.2009 18:08

The USAID-funded Competitive Armenian Private Sector (CAPS) Project
in partnership with the Ministry of Health, the Scientific Center
of Drug and Medical Technology Expertise, the Union of Medicine
Producers and Importers of Armenia, Armenian Development Agency, and
National Competitiveness Foundation are organizing the 2rd Armenian
Pharmaceutical Competitiveness Conference on December 1 in Yerevan.

The event aims to update industry representatives on the current status
of the sector, promote collaboration among pharmaceutical sector
stakeholders, and encourage discussions on major industry issues,
including financial crisis impact on pharmaceutical production,
adoption of Good "X" Practices (GXP) regulations and export market
opportunities.

The conference builds upon the success of the first Pharmaceutical
Competitiveness Conference, held last November by CAPS and its
major partners in the pharmaceutical industry. The conference
focused on introducing Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). Since
then, notable steps have been taken toward GMP implementation in
Armenia. For example, in May this year, a GMP training program
featuring international experts was conducted in Armenia for the
first time through the joint efforts of the CAPS Project and major
industry stakeholders. The GMP training was followed by a trainers’
course, creating local GMP trainers able to continue pharmaceutical
training through the GXP Center of Excellence, which was established
in June this year.

Conference participants will discuss opportunities for Armenian
pharmaceutical producers in domestic and foreign markets, the need for
improvements in medicine regulation, as well as the current situation
of medicine production in Armenia and possible development scenarios.

The event is open to pharmaceutical producers, government and
international organizations, educational institutions, NGOs, business
associations, pharmaceutical professionals, the press and those
interested in Armenia’s pharmaceutical industry.