Directors Of 6 Yerevan High Schools Fired In 2005

DIRECTORS OF 6 YEREVAN HIGH SCHOOLS FIRED IN 2005

YEREVAN, MAY 30. ARMINFO. The directors of 6 Yerevan high schools
have been fired this year for abuse of office and misappropriating
200,000-500,000 AMD this year, says Vice Mayor of Yerevan Kamo Areyan.

14 pupils have been expelled for over 240 hours of absence. School
leaving exams are to scheduled for June 1-20: compulsory written
tests in mathematics and Armenian language, written test in physics,
chemistry or biology (optional), oral exams in Armenian literature,
Armenian history and foreign language (optional).

Aspiring for gold medal this year are only 23 school leavers against
52 ones last year with no privileges given.

Armenia Must Harmonize Its Legislation With European Values: VardanO

ARMENIA MUST HARMONIZE ITS LEGISLATION WITH EUROPEAN VALUES: VARDAN OSKANYAN

YEREVAN, May 30. /ARKA/. Armenia must harmonize its legislation with
European values, RA Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan told reporters,
commenting on the Venetian Commission’s statement on the draft
amendments to the RA Constitution. He pointed out that Armenia has
set itself the task of integration and harmonizing its legislation
with European values. “Much has bee done in this direction, but we
all are not at the level where both we and European want us to be,”
Oskanyan said. The Minister reported that during Venetian Commission
representatives’ visit to Armenia on June 2 negotiations will be held,
the country’s peculiarities and prospects for evolutionary development
will be considered. Oskanyan pointed out that he is for the potential
to be used to the maximum.

The Venetian Commission expressed its dissatisfaction with the
draft amendments to the RA Constitution adopted in the first reading
on May 11, 2005. The draft amendments to the Constitution must be
radically revised before being adopted in the second reading, the
Venetian Commission member, representative of Finland Kaarlo Tuori
said. The task group members also stated that if the document does
not fully reflect the Commission’s opinion the constitutional reforms
in Armenia will not bring the country’s closer to European standards
and fail to contribute to further European integration. P.T. -0–

BAKU: Russian mediator pleased with Karabakh peace talks in Baku -ag

Russian mediator pleased with Karabakh peace talks in Baku – agency

Trend news agency
30 May 05

Baku, 30 May: Russian diplomat Yuriy Merzlyakov is pleased with the
results of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs’ visit to Baku and the
meetings they held here within the Nagornyy Karabakh peace process,
Merzlyakov has said in an exclusive interview with Trend.

“My impressions are very good and the talks with Azerbaijani Foreign
Minister [Elmar Mammadyarov] were, in my opinion, very constructive.
At least, we set tentatively the dates of the next meetings between the
[Azerbaijani and Armenian] foreign ministers with the participation of
the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs. Now, the prospects are clear,” he said.

Merzlyakov said the co-chairs’ meeting with Azerbaijani President
Ilham Aliyev, which was held at the initiative of the Azerbaijani side,
was very important.

“Our current visit is not a traditional, customary visit the co-chairs
make to the region. We have come here to meet the foreign ministers. We
are very grateful to Mr President for this. Aliyev found time to
meet the co-chairs following quite a difficult period of preparation
and celebration of the launch of the Azerbaijani section of the
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. I think we had a very interesting and
important meeting with him which allows us to hope that the process
will further develop in a constructive direction,” Merzlyakov said.

He said a date would be set within the next two days for the Minsk
Group co-chairs’ meeting with Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan
Oskanyan. This meeting is to be held during the first half of June.
The Azerbaijani and Armenian foreign ministers will then meet in
mid-June with the participation of the Minsk Group co-chairs. The
exact dates and venues of these meetings have not yet been decided.

The co-chairs will most probably pay another visit to the region
of the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict during the first half of July,
Merzlyakov said.

Armenian minister rules out public discussions on Karabakh

Armenian minister rules out public discussions on Karabakh

Mediamax news agency
30 May 05

Yerevan, 30 May: The status of Nagornyy Karabakh and return of the
territories around it “are closely interrelated”, Armenian Foreign
Minister Vardan Oskanyan said in Yerevan today.

The Armenian foreign minister said that public discussions of
components of a peaceful settlement to the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict
may lead to misunderstanding and block the positive progress in the
talks that was achieved after the recent meeting of the Armenian and
Azerbaijani presidents [Robert Kocharyan and Ilham Aliyev] in Warsaw
[on 15 May].

Kirk Kerkorian, l’homme qui repart a l’assaut de General Motors

Le Figaro Économie
27 mai 2005

Kirk Kerkorian, l’homme qui repart à l’assaut de General Motors;
AUTOMOBILE Le milliardaire américain est sur le point de devenir le
premier actionnaire du géant de Detroit

Charles Gautier

Kerkorian revient ! Bon pied bon oeil, l’actif et svelte octogénaire,
à l’origine du mythe de Las Vegas, n’entend pas se ranger des
voitures. A Detroit, berceau de l’industrie automobile américaine où
les bonnes nouvelles sont plutôt rares ces derniers temps, l’intérêt
porté par le roi de Las Vegas, propriétaire de la MGM-Mirage, premier
groupe mondial de jeu possédant la moitié de la capacité hôtelière de
la capitale des bandits manchots, réjouit : si l’ancien actionnaire
de référence de Chrysler, l’un des hommes les plus riches des
Etats-Unis, s’intéresse encore à l’automobile, c’est assurément que
la capitale mondiale du secteur a encore de beaux jours devant elle.

Le retour dans l’automobile du « Lion tranquille » étonne. Le procès
houleux intenté à Daimler lors du rapprochement avec Chrysler (1)
laissait penser aux milieux financiers que Kirk Kerkorian prendrait,
à défaut de sa retraite, au moins ses distances avec cette industrie.
Une fois de plus, il a pris tout son monde à contre-pied en voulant
faire monter sa participation dans le capital du premier constructeur
mondial de 3,89 % à près de 10 %.

« C’est une bonne nouvelle car Kerkorian est un btisseur, pas un
destructeur ou un dépeceur d’entreprises, réagit un analyste de JP
Morgan, Philippe Houchois. Cette opération prouve que l’on peut
encore gagner de l’argent dans cette industrie. »

Une vraie dose de Prozac en quelque sorte, pour combattre la grosse
déprime qui s’est abattue sur Detroit où les principaux constructeurs
américains se lamentent avec des profits en berne, des ventes en
chute libre, et une dégradation de la dette de Ford et de GM.

C’est pourtant le moment qu’a choisi Kirk Kerkorian, pour se lancer
dans un massif ramassage de titres General Motors via son holding
Tracinda (voir encadré). L’homme a pour objectif de récupérer 28
millions d’actions pour 878 millions de dollars. Une paille. L’offre
de Tracinda, rendue publique le 4 mai dernier, doit expirer le 7
juin.

La veille, cet homme d’affaires hors norme fêtera son 88 e
anniversaire. La pugnacité de cet ancien boxeur professionnel
surnommé « Rifle right kerkorian » et cette longévité ne surprend pas
Line Renaud. La chanteuse est sans doute l’une des personnes qui le
connaît le mieux en France. La première rencontre organisée par son
agent, un Arménien comme Kirk Kerkorian, remonte au début des années
60.

« Kirk a toujours été un grand sportif, il a toujours aimé le tennis
et la marche, explique-t-elle. Il faisait de grandes séances de
jogging autour du terrain de golf du Desert Inn à Las Vegas. C’est
peut-être l’un des secrets de cette longévité. Il ne fume pas, il ne
boit parfois qu’un peu de vin rouge », explique encore la comédienne
qui a eu maintes fois l’occasion de le recevoir quand elle vivait en
Californie. Parfois même à l’occasion de réceptions privées en
l’honneur de Jacques Chirac.

Avant de faire parler de lui dans le jeu et l’hôtellerie, l’homme
d’affaires a engagé sa carrière au lendemain de la Seconde Guerre
mondiale en lançant sa compagnie aérienne. Voler a toujours été sa
passion. « Kirk » s’est du reste distingué comme pilote de bombardier
au sein de la Royal Air Force. « J’aimais quand il me racontait
comment il retapait de vieux avions avec des pièces d’occasion, pour
les revendre ensuite. Il disait qu’à cette époque il avait à peine de
quoi ressemeler ses chaussures », se souvient Line Renaud.

Ces temps difficiles lui ont permis de jeter progressivement les
fondations de son empire. Il en gardera une forme de modestie et de
simplicité. De fait, il n’est ni un homme extravagant ni un ermite…
Rien à voir donc avec Howard Hugues dont il a eu pourtant un peu la
même trajectoire.

Son immense fortune, évaluée à 8 milliards de dollars, a réellement
prospéré sur la terre ferme, à coup de rachats de terrains à Las
Vegas. C’est sur ce sol hostile qu’il érige les hôtels aujourd’hui
les plus célèbres de la ville tels que le Flamingo, le MGM…

Discret, il n’aime pas accorder d’entretiens, recevoir de récompenses
ou prononcer des discours. Il est avant tout un homme de terrain qui
s’est toujours efforcé de s’entourer de la même équipe de
collaborateurs. Son sens des affaires est incontestable. Mais ce
n’est pas le seul ingrédient à l’origine de sa fortune…

« Bien entendu il a une énorme puissance de travail, mais cela ne
suffit pas, explique Line Renaud, c’est un M. 100 000 volts mais rien
ne transparaît sur son visage, cela ne se voit pas, il est calme,
presque timide. »

Certains habitués de Las Vegas estiment que cette impassibilité a
favorisé sa réputation de joueur de poker, capable de btir ou de
perdre des fortunes en une nuit. « En exagérant on pourrait dire que
pour lui faire des affaires c’est une forme d’art, explique Line
Renaud et qui assure, si les hommes d’affaires étaient à l’affiche
comme les artistes, il serait tout en haut… »

A Detroit on attend avec impatience le comportement du roi de Las
Vegas. Se contentera-t-il de surveiller son investissement où
voudra-t-il être plus actif dans la gestion de General Motors ?

A priori Kirk Kerkorian se défend de vouloir s’immiscer dans la
gestion. Mais Rick Wagoner, le président du constructeur, sait qu’il
aura au premier rang de ses actionnaires un homme qui connaît
parfaitement l’industrie automobile pour avoir, à l’époque de
Chrysler négocié avec le puissant syndicat de branche UAW. Un atout
de taille lorsque de nouvelles négociations se profileront. Après
tout, GM a perdu 1,1 milliard de dollars au premier trimestre
essentiellement en Amérique du Nord. Il est donc urgent d’agir. A 88
ans, Kirk Kerkorian n’a pas de temps à perdre.

(1) Kirk Kerkorian a été débouté début avril d’une plainte contre
DaimlerChrysler. L’homme d’affaires accuse le groupe automobile
d’avoir menti sur la nature de la fusion de Daimler-Benz avec
Chrysler en 1998. Il fait appel du premier jugement. Kerkorian
détenait à l’époque de la fusion 14 % du capital de Chrysler. Le
rapprochement entre les deux groupes aurait lésé les anciens
actionnaires du constructeur américain. Il réclame au total 1,2
milliard de dollars de dédommagements.

Hungarian Armenians first time in Armenia

AZG Armenian Daily #096, 27/05/2005

Diaspora

HUNGARIAN ARMENIANS FIRST TIME IN ARMENIA

The first ever group of Hungarian-speaking Armenians arrived in Armenia with
a ten-day visit escorted by president of “Armenian Roots of Transylvania”
organization, Charlotte Ishiketzu. They brought with them huge literature on
the history of Armenian community in Transylvania and Hungary to present to
the Academy of Sciences, Matenadaran and National Library. “We brought the
warmth of our hearts, we are united with our motherland in our souls and we
wish to even more cement our relations with it”, president of the
organization said.

Ancestors of Hungarian-speaking Armenians set out from ancient Armenian
capital of Ani in 1239 and having wandered in different countries gained
permission to settle in Transylvania in 1672. They founded there 2 towns.
They lost their Armenian dialect with time, changed last names and did not
differ from the Hungarians till 1993, when Hungary adopted law on national
minorities. Armenians together with other minorities registered their
national self-governance. Thanks to the state subsidies, today the Armenian
community of Hungary has schools and publishing houses. They publish a
magazine, books and organize exhibitions and diverse arrangements.

An exhibition dedicated to the 90th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide
opened yesterday at the Union of Cultural Ties with Foreign Countries.
“Armenian Symphony” drawings by one of founders of “Armenian Roots of
Transylvania”, Tibor Vakar, which he created in 1960s having visited Armenia
for the first time, are staged at the exhibition.

Hungarian Armenians have applied to the parliament of the state with a
petition to put the issue of the Armenian Genocide on the agenda of Hungary
but with no avail so far. But their are still hopeful that the issue will
top the agenda in near future.

“On Forbidden Star”, book by Janush Pilinski, which Vahram Martirosian has
been translating for 20 years finally reached the Armenian readers.
“Pilinski was very close to me as poet and I translated him with love. His
language is laconic, he uses no epithets, is very sparing in drawing
parallels and reaches bottomless depths due to his colloquial speech”,
Vahram Martirosian said.

By Ruzan Poghosian

Thomas Goltz discusses the new underground oil pipeline BTC

National Public Radio (NPR)
SHOW: All Things Considered 9:00 AM EST NPR
May 25, 2005 Wednesday

Thomas Goltz discusses the new underground oil pipeline running from
the Caspian Sea to the Mediterranean coast of Turkey

ANCHORS: MICHELE NORRIS, MELISSA BLOCK

MICHELE NORRIS, host:

>From NPR News, this is ALL THINGS CONSIDERED. I’m Michele Norris.

MELISSA BLOCK, host:

And I’m Melissa Block.

They’re calling it the Silk Road of the 21st century. The first
section of an 1,100-mile oil pipeline was officially opened today in
Azerbaijan. The underground pipeline will carry oil from the Caspian
Sea through Georgia and on to the Mediterranean coast of Turkey. The
idea is to reduce dependence both on oil from the Middle East and on
existing Russian pipelines. Thomas Goltz writes about the
Transcaucasus region and has traveled the route of the pipeline.

Let’s explain first, Mr. Goltz, how Caspian oil travels now.

Mr. THOMAS GOLTZ (Author, “Azerbaijan Diary”): Well, there are
several export routes out of the Caspian right now. Most go up to the
Black Sea via pipelines, and that becomes problematic because all
that oil has to get on tankers that have to negotiate the Bosphorus
through the very middle of Istanbul, which is an environmental
disaster, a catastrophe just waiting to happen. There’s also train
traffic, which is much more expensive and dirty as well that brings
crude product to the shores of the Black Sea. And then there are
truck and train traffic going through Iran down to the Persian Gulf.

BLOCK: Well, here’s where geopolitics comes in, ’cause if you look at
the route that they have designed for this pipeline, it is not the
most direct route. They could have easily gone through Iran and
gotten to Turkey quite a bit faster.

Mr. GOLTZ: Yes, or cross Armenia into Turkey. Azerbaijan and Armenia
have been locked in a sort of miniature cold war for the last 12
years or so. So that meant that Georgia got dealt into the thing, and
that has become the primary source of future revenue for the state of
Georgia.

BLOCK: Put this into context for us, if you would. This pipeline will
eventually be carrying a million barrels of oil a day, by 2009
they’re saying. How significant is that?

Mr. GOLTZ: The figure is varied, but generally it’s assumed that this
is about 2 percent of world crude output. It is believed that this
will just be the beginning of a larger stream of Caspian crude and
Central Asian crude to come through this particular line.

BLOCK: One of the arguments in favor of the pipeline has been that it
will increase or enhance regional stability. How would it do that?

Mr. GOLTZ: Well, that’s the song that Washington wants to sing about
this. I’m not sure if that’s accurate or not. In history and across
the world, find me a so-called peace pipeline. What it does do,
however, is bring a certain amount of stability to every one of the
countries along the route. In addition to the sort of trickle-down of
jobs associated with either digging trenches or monitoring the
pipeline, obviously there are things like the Oil Fund that has been
set up in Azerbaijan to ensure that some of this revenue that accrues
from Azeri crude will actually be seen by future generations.

BLOCK: Is it clear–I mean, there are a number of oil companies who
will be profiting from this. But is it clear that those revenues will
be distributed, at least some of them, to the local population?

Mr. GOLTZ: BP has got a pretty good record–they’re the leading
company in this pipeline consortium. They’ve got a pretty good record
of local community input, building schools, hiring teachers, this
sort of thing. But oil, as my old professor, Charles Issawi, always
used to say, is a dirty business, and where it is flowing, you will
find corruption.

BLOCK: Mr. Goltz, what about security for the pipeline?

Mr. GOLTZ: Well, the pipeline is underground for its entire length,
so that the idea of somebody just casually coming up and sabotaging
the thing is very, very remote. With the other pipelines in the
region, the companies have hired on basically cowboys on horsebacks
who ride up and down the lines to ensure that no bombs are being set
at pumping stations and such. Like–and we can be pretty sure that
with the level of investment–this is a $3.2 billion construction
projection–that BP and the various other partners involved in the
thing are going to try and keep it running as smoothly as possible.

BLOCK: You spent quite a while traveling by motorcycle along the
route of this pipeline. What do you see as you go along? Do you see a
landscape that’s been completely transformed by what’s coming
through?

Mr. GOLTZ: Well, once you get the heavy equipment out of there, it’s
basically–there’s a trench that you lay the pipe in, then you fill
on top of that. But the promise is to leave a completely undisturbed
environment behind. In terms of the terrain itself, it ranges from
the deserts of Azerbaijan, mountains in south-central Georgia and
mountains and vast vistas throughout Turkey. The highest point is
about 8,000 feet, a place right on the Georgia-Turkish frontier, a
glorious, beautiful mountain called Ilgaz Pass. And then you get down
to the hot citrus-growing areas of the Turkish Mediterranean. So it’s
a wide variety of climates as well as geography, and it was an
extraordinary engineering task.

BLOCK: Well, Thomas Goltz, thanks very much.

Mr. GOLTZ: You betcha. Thanks.

BLOCK: Thomas Goltz is author of “Azerbaijan Diary.” He spoke with us
from Livingston, Montana.

You can see photos of his trip along the route of the pipeline at our
Web site, npr.org.

Minister for Education & Science To Pay Two-Day Visit to Georgia

ARMENIA’s MINISTER FOR EDUCATION AND SCIENCE TO PAY TWO-DAY VISIT TO
GEORGIA

TBILISI, MAY 26. ARMINFO. On May 27, Armenia’s Minister for education
and science Sergo Yeritsyan will leave for Georgia on two-day visit,
ARMINFO was informed in Ministry’s press-service.

As “News-Georgia” was informed in Georgia’s press-service of education
and science Ministry, Yeritsyan is to meet with Georgia’s Minister for
education and science Alexandr Lomaya and ministry’s other
representatives, to visit Armenia’s embassy in Georgia, 104th
secondary school in Tbilisi and Georgia’s State agrarian university.
On May 28, Yeritsyan will visit an Armenian church in Tbilisi and the
Pantheon, as well as Tbilisi pedagogical university after Sulkhan Saba
Orbeliani to meet with both workers of chair of Armenian language and
literature and Armenian language teachers of Georgian schools with
Armenian teaching. Yeritsyan will return Yerevan on May 28.

ASBAREZ Online [05-26-2005]

ASBAREZ ONLINE
TOP STORIES
05/26/2005
TO ACCESS PREVIOUS ASBAREZ ONLINE EDITIONS PLEASE VISIT OUR
WEBSITE AT <;HTTP://

1) Armenian Victories Celebrated at Sardarabad
2) Ankara under Fire over Armenian Conference Cancellation
3) Karabagh FM Rules out Resolution to Conflict without Popular Consent
4) German Opposition Leader Wants Turkey to Improve Ties with Armenia

1) Armenian Victories Celebrated at Sardarabad

YEREVAN (Yerkir)–The Armenian Revolutionary Federation (ARF) Supreme Body of
Armenia marked the 87th anniversary of the May 28, 1918 Armenian Independence
Day at the Sardarabad Museum and Memorial.
In his opening remarks, Supreme Body representative Armen Rustamian said,
`May
is our symbol of unity. The ARF is marking the victories this nation has
won in
the battles of Avarair, Sardarapat and Shushi, as well as the victory in the
Great Patriotic War in a unique way–in open-air celebrations… Another display
of such unity will take place on May 28 around Mount Aragats,” Rustamian
said.
Armavir governor Albert Heroyan, in turn, said, “About 3,500 Armenians have
shed their blood here to create an independent Armenia.”
“Sardarabad is an unforgettable page of our history, and every Armenian feels
stronger here,” Lavrenti Barseghian, director of the Genocide and Sardarabad
museums said, addressing the crowd.

2) Ankara under Fire over Armenian Conference Cancellation

(AFP/EUObserver)–Turkey came under fire Thursday for halting a landmark
conference questioning the official line on the mass killings of Armenians
under the Ottoman Empire, as European Union diplomats warned that Ankara’s
democratic credentials had taken a serious blow.
Istanbul’s prestigious Bogazici University, where the gathering was to open
Wednesday, put off the event after Justice Minister Cemil Cicek accused the
participants–Turkish academics and intellectuals who dispute Ankara’s version
of the 1915-1917 massacres–of “treason.” Cicek condemned the initiative as “a
stab in the back to the Turkish nation” and said the organizers deserved to be
prosecuted.
The Genocide, one of the most controversial episodes in Ottoman history, is
rarely discussed in schools and the aborted conference would have been the
first by Turkish personalities to question the official stand on the events.
Several countries have recognized the massacres as genocide–a theory Turkey
fiercely rejects–and Brussels has urged Ankara to face its past and expand
freedom of speech.
“The remarks of the justice minister are unacceptable. This is an
authoritarian approach raising questions over Turkey’s reform process,” a
diplomat from an EU country said on the condition of anonymity.
“Now it is a real watershed. We expect government action to correct Cicek’s
remarks,” he said. “It’s up to the government to decide what to do. Doing
nothing would be also a choice, but certainly not in favor of Turkey’s EU
membership prospects.”
`Since Çiçek delivered his remarks under his title of justice minister and
government spokesman at Parliament, the bloc would accept his remarks as the
Turkish government’s position towards freedom of expression,’ one EU diplomat
emphasized.
Another EU diplomat regretted the postponement of the conference because it
“would have reflected the evolution taking place in Turkish society.” The
EU is
looking forward for the conference to be rescheduled, he said, adding: “The
Europeans will keep on insisting that civil society has a great role to
play in
Turkey.”
The Turkish media too lashed out at the justice minister, saying his outburst
cast a pall on freedom of expression in the country and played into the hands
of a mounting Armenian campaign to have the massacres recognized
internationally as genocide.
“Zero tolerance to freedom,” the Radikal daily trumpeted on its front page,
while Milliyet’s headline declared: “Democracy takes a blow.”
“What, really, is treason? To hold a conference in order to start a debate in
Turkey on a Turkish problem debated almost everywhere in the world, or to
brand
as ‘traitors’ people who may think differently at a time when Turkey is waging
a battle for democracy in the face of many obstacles?” wrote columnist Murat
Celikkan in Radikal.
“Cemil Cicek should resign as justice minister and if does not, he should be
forced to do so,” he said.
The EU expressed regret concerning “the mixed messages” coming from Turkey.
“We are aware of the tragedy in 1915. We hope that now, thanks to the EU
prospect it will be possible to create a climate of confidence with the
Armenians,” a spokesperson for the European Commission said.
This is why “we expect that such a seminar will be held in the future, as the
academic point of view is highly valuable when discussing these historical
issues,” she added.
However, the spokesperson declined to speculate on possible consequences for
the launch of EU talks, due on October 3.
“A clear agreement on starting the talks was reached by the Council [member
states], the decision was taken at the highest political level,” she said.
“The European Commission continues to monitor the situation and will issue a
statement in its next [enlargement] report on Turkey,” the spokesperson
concluded.
Some countries, particularly France, which has a large Armenian population,
have pushed for a tough line on Turkey in regards to Armenia.
The EU has said it wants to see Turkey improve ties with neighboring Armenia
before it begins EU entry talks later this year. Some European officials have
gone further, saying Turkey must acknowledge wrongdoing before starting talks.
“This strengthens the hand of those outside Turkey who say, ‘Turkey has not
changed, it is not democratic enough to discuss the Armenian issue,'” said
Hrant Dink, editor of the Armenian weekly Agos and a conference participant.
“It also shows there is a difference between what the government says and its
intentions.”

3) Karabagh FM Rules out Resolution to Conflict without Popular Consent

STEPANAKERT (PanArmenian.Net)–Mountainous Karabagh Republic’s (MKR) foreign
minister Arman Melikian said it is premature to speculate about the outcome of
the meeting between Armenian and Azeri Presidents, held last week in Warsaw.
`The OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs consider that there is progress; the foreign
ministers also speak of possible progress. But nothing is obvious yet,’
Melikian said during an interview aired on Karabagh public TV.
`It should be understood, however, that control over the territories is the
business of the MKR authorities, and any developments or any preliminary
agreement cannot be put into practice without the consent and participation of
the people of Karabagh,’ he stressed.
Melikian advised remaining calm concerning possible outcomes, and advised:
`There are merely mutually optimistic statements. If these are grounded, it is
not so bad.’

4) German Opposition Leader Wants Turkey to Improve Ties with Armenia

(RFE/RL)–Germany’s top opposition leader who is tipped to defeat Chancellor
Gerhard Schroeder in upcoming parliamentary elections urged Turkey on Thursday
to improve its strained relations with Armenia before starting accession talks
with the European Union.
Reuters news agency quoted Christian Democratic Union (CDU) leader Angela
Merkel as saying that “time is ripe” for Turkey to establish direct relations
with Armenia. She said the Turkish government should also clarify its
stance on
Cyprus before the start of the accession talks on October 3.
The CDU, which is strongly opposed to Turkish membership in the EU, is the
main sponsor of a draft resolution by the German parliament, the Bundestag,
that calls on Turkey to “take historic responsibility” for the Armenian
genocide.
Although the declaration, which is expected to be formally adopted by the
Bundestag next month, stops short of calling the mass killings genocide, it
has
been strongly condemned by Ankara. In a statement last February, Turkey’s
ambassador to Germany accused the CDU of acting as a “spokesman for fanatical
Armenian nationalism.”

All subscription inquiries and changes must be made through the proper carrier
and not Asbarez Online. ASBAREZ ONLINE does not transmit address changes and
subscription requests.
(c) 2005 ASBAREZ ONLINE. All Rights Reserved.

ASBAREZ provides this news service to ARMENIAN NEWS NETWORK members for
academic research or personal use only and may not be reproduced in or through
mass media outlets.

http://www.asbarez.com/&gt
HTTP://WWW.ASBAREZ.COM
WWW.ASBAREZ.COM

ANKARA: Turkey Is An Important Energy Partner For Caspian

Caspian Energy
caspenergy.com
05/25/2005

TURKEY IS AN IMPORTANT ENERGY PARTNER FOR CASPIAN

Exclusive interview of the State Minister of Turkey for foreign commerce Mr.
Gulshat Tuzmen

Caspian Energy: Mr. Minister could you please explain of today’s main
priorities of foreign economy course of Turkey, which countries’ relations
are major to Turkey?

Gulshat Tuzmen: – During the last decade, Turkey has diversified its exports
not only in products but also in terms of markets. Turkey’s main trading
partners du- ring the last decade have been the EU countries. Turkey’s
exports to the central and eastern European countries and the CIS countries
have also been increasing stea- dily.

In 2004, Turkey’s exports reached a record-high level of 63.01 billion USD
with an increase of 40,4% while our imports increased by 55,4% compared to
the previous year reaching 97.34 billion USD (SIS Figures).

It is worthy to note that bilateral trade relations with EU countries have
always been of utmost importance for Turkey. While the trade volume between
Turkey and EU countries realized as 79.8 billion USD in 2004, our exports to
EU countries have reached to 34.4 billion USD and the imports of Turkey from
these countries were realized as 45.4 billion USD.

At this point, it should be pointed out that Germany, as being one of the EU
countries, ranks the first place in Turkey’s foreign trade. The volume of
trade between Turkey and Germany has displayed an increasing trend during
the last decade and reached its highest level in 2004 with a value of 21.3
billion USD. In 2004, Turkey’s exports to Germany were 8.4 billion USD,
reflecting an increase of 17% as compared to the previous year, while our
imports from Germany were 12.5 billion USD showing an annual increase of
32%.

The U.S. has always been one of the major trading partners of Turkey ranking
the third in our exports and the fifth in imports. Bilateral trade volume
increased more than 30% in 2004. But the figures from US side indicate that
Turkey is not an important trade partner for US: However Turkey’s share of
the US foreign trade is less than 0,5 %. Turkey’s exports to the U.S were
3.75 billion USD and our imports from the US were about 3.5 billion USD in
the year of 2003. Turkey’s exports to the U.S reached to 4.8 billion and our
imports from the U.S. were about 4.7 billion level in 2004. According to
these figures Turkey’s exports to the USA increased to 28% and imports from
the USA increased 34%. Nevertheless the trade figures have been below the
real potentialities of both economies and there is a wide room to utilize
the economic potentials of both countries.

In addition to the traditional markets, Turkey’s aim is to focus on
improving the trade relations with the neighboring and surrounding
countries. In line with this objective, the “Trade Development Strategy with
Neighboring and Surrounding Countries” was initiated in 2000.

This strategy involves Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Georgia, Greece, Iran, Iraq,
Romania, the Russian Federation, Syria and Ukraine as the neighboring
countries, and Moldova, Albania, Algeria, Egypt, Hungary, Israel, Jordan,
Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Macedonia, Saudi Arabia, Tajikistan,
Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan as the surrounding countries. In 2003, Hungary,
Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia,
Yugoslavia, Sudan, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Djibouti, Somali, Lebanon, Kuwait,
Bahrain, Qatar, U.A.E, Oman, Yemen, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Belarus were
added to this strategy.

Thanks to this strategy, the share of these countries in Turkey’s total
trade volume increased from 7% to 21% within three years. Our main aim is to
raise the share of the neighboring and surrounding countries in our total
trade volume to 30% in the short run.

On the other hand, the Middle East has a crucial place in Turkey’s foreign
relations within political and economic spheres. In 2004, the trade between
Turkey and the region was recorded as 12.3 billion USD with an increase of
32% compared to 2003.

As a result of the Trade Development Strategy with the Neighboring and
Surrounding Countries, Turkey is looking for new ways to enhance its trade
and support a fair trading environment in the Middle East, the South Eastern
Europe, the Black Sea region, the Caucasus and the Central Asia.

Turkey also initiated a strategy towards enhancing the economic relations
with Africa in 2003. In line with this strategy, the trade volume between
Turkey and the African countries reached 7.7 billion USD indicating an
increase of 92% within two years.

What’s your estimation concerning internal figures of Turkish economy
development?

– Leaving the 2001 economic crises far behind, 2004 has been another
flourishing year for Turkish economy.

One of the most remarkable achievements has been in the battle against
inflation. The rate of increase in Consumer Price Index (PPI), which was
68,5% in year 2001, was successfully reduced to 9,3% in 2004. As for the
rate of increase in Producer Price Index (PPI), which was nearly 90% in the
year 2001, it was also reduced to 13,8% in 2004. The rates of increase in
the indices are expected to be 8% in 2005. Turkey has welcomed New Turkish
Lira, relieved from six zeros, in the beginning of 2005.

The main indicator reflecting the improvement in 2004 is interest rates.
Real interest rate of domestic debt has decreased to 10,7% by December 2004
from 16,5% in December 2003. Industrial production, which increased by 9.1%
in 2003 and by 9.8% in 2004, also reflects the improvement in the economy.
Increase in the manufactured goods was 10.4% in 2004.

Capacity utilization rates were 78.6% in 2003 and it rose to 83.5% by June
2004. Average rate for 2004 was 81,5% that reflects the need for new
investments in order to carry on the high rate of growth in the economy.

2004 is a year in which the budget performance has improved substantially.
Primary surplus was 30% higher than expected. On the other hand, domestic
and foreign debts continued to increase at a high rate. Foreign debt has
increased to 153.2 billion dollars in the third quarter of 2004 from 145.8
billion USD in 2003.

One of the greatest impacts to the economic growth has come from exports.
Compared to the previous year, exports reached a value of 62,8 billion USD
by 32,8% increase.

Especially “transport vehicles and its subsidiary industries” has brought
enormous dynamism to Turkey. Exports of this sector increased by nearly 60%
both in two adjacent recent years and approached a value of 8.3 billion USD
in 2004.

Another important sector for Turkey is undoubtedly “textiles and
ready-wear”, which is under growing threat of Chinese competition. The value
of the exports for the sector was high at about 18 billion USD in 2004. The
rate of increase, though lower than the average rate of increase, was still
good for a mature industry at 15,4% and the share of the sector in total
exports was 28%.

75% of “transport vehicles and its subsidiary industries” exports and 55% of
total exports were to the European Union countries. Other than EU; Middle
East, Commonwealth of Independent States, NAFTA and North Africa are also
among the regions, to which Turkish exports rose more than 30% in 2004.
England, Italy, Germany, USA, Iraq, France, Spain, Netherlands and Russia
are listed in the top in the Turkish export value increases.

According to the calculations of the Undersecretariat for Foreign Trade,
Turkish Lira in real terms appreciated by 10% against USD and 4% against
Euro in 2004. The cumulative appreciation against USD between 1999 and 2004
has been 36,6%. It is obvious that the exchange rates have not been in favor
of Turkish exporters. However, exports have increased from 27 billion USD to
63 billion USD, meaning a 136% increase, in the last five years.

There are various reasons underlying the phenomenon. Quality, customer
relations and geographical advantages are among the most crucial factors.
Also, as about 55% of Turkish imports are valued in dollars, cheap dollar
enabled Turkish exporters to access low-priced intermediary and capital
goods.

In 2004, despite the 32,8% rise in export income, current account deficit
increased by 93,8% and became 15,5 billion USD. The increase mainly stems
from imports.

About 85-90% of Turkish imports are composed of capital goods and
intermediary goods. The composition of the imports highlights the fact that
the increasing imports boosted production for domestic and foreign markets.
Turkish economy grew by 9.7% in the first three quarters of 2004 after a
7.9% growth in 2002 and 5.9% in 2003. Capacity utilization ratio of the
manufacturing industry supports this view, as well. Capacity utilization was
on average 80% in 2004, whereas it was 72% and 75% in 2002 and 2003,
respectively.

What’s the perspective of development of the economy mutual relations with
Caspian countries, could you please make known us about the largest pro-
jects with Azerbaijan, Russia, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Iran?

– In all economically developed regions, intra-regional trade plays a
pivotal role in economic development, which has been missing for a long time
in the Caspian region.

We are aiming to alter this structure and enhance the intra regional trade
and economic links. In this respect, the main objective of our policies has
been to improve the trade relations with our neighbors and surrounding
countries since 2000. Our immediate neighborhood comes as the natural trade
and economic partners.

Believing that enhanced trade links in the region will also contribute to
the economic and political stability in its region, Turkey attaches great
importance to the bilateral and regional initiatives, for facilitating trade
and for creating a fair and predictable trading environment in the Black Sea
region, the Caucasus and the Caspian Sea basin.

Focus point of Turkey’s trade strategy is, of course, to improve our
performance and competitiveness in the fields of exports of goods and
services in the immediate neighboring countries, in this regard, to our
east, including but not limited to, Iran, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and
Turkmenistan.

We achieved quite progress in reaching out to the consumers in these
countries. Let me dwell upon Iran first.

Our exports to Iran which was recorded as 158 million USD in 1999 quadrupled
in 2004 and reached 803 million USD which indicates 50% increase compared to
2003.

Our imports on the other hand were rea- lized as 1.9 billion USD in 2004,
increasing by 5% compared to the same period of 2003. The trade volume was
realized as 2.7 billion USD in 2004.

We set the target for bilateral trade as 4.5 million dollars for this year
and 10 billion USD in the medium term.

However, I have to underline the trade deficit against Turkey in trade
between Turkey and Iran. As of 2004, the trade deficit was around 1.1
billion USD. We consider our natural gas importation from Iran as the major
source of the deficit. We are working on some projects to enhance our
bilateral trade relations.

To achieve our medium term target in trade, we initiated negotiations with
Iran on a Preferential Trade Agreement aiming at progressive reduction of
tariffs and elimination of the non-tariff barriers.

We have been doing our utmost to improve infrastructure of border gates and
its connecting ways. The modernization of Kapikoy Border Gate under BOT was
completed in 2003. Now, we have been doing rehabilitation of Van/Kapikoy and
HakkariEsendere border gates.

On the other hand, we have recently established Border Trade Centers on the
border between Turkey and Iran namely in Sarisu, Kapikoy/Razi, and
Esendere/Serow region in order to foster, support and boost the economic
activities of the border and peripheral cities of both countries.

Direct investments realized by Turkish companies in Iran have increased
considerably during last two years. Today, Turkey, which have invested in
Iran 150 million USD, are ranked the second biggest investor country in Iran
after Germany.

Similarly, during the last two years we observed also considerable increase
in the activities of the Turkish contracting companies in Iran. By the end
of 2004, the total amount of the projects undertaken by Turkish contracting
companies in Iran reached 370 million USD.

Energy constitutes one of the significant sectors for the improvement of
economic relations between Turkey and Iran. In 2002, Iran and Turkey
inaugurated the natural gas pipeline link between the two countries. Now,
new project on transmission of Iranian natural gas via Turkey to the
European countries is on our agenda.

Now, let me turn to our relations with the Caucasus and the Central Asia.

Compared with 2003, our exports to the Caucasus and Central Asia (except
Armenia) increased by almost 35% by the end of 2004 and reached 826 millions
USD.

In 2000, the share of the Central Asia in our total exports was 0.9%. In
2004, it reached 1.32%. Since 2000 until 2004, our exports to Azerbaijan and
Turkmenistan increased two times while in Kazakhstan, our exports grew by
three times.

Compared with 2003, the Turkish companies’ exports to Azerbaijan grew by
28%, reaching 400 millions USD in 2004.

Our aim is to reach 1,5 billion dollars of exports to Central Asia (except
Armenia) in the next two years. But, we are striving to accomplish that in
2005.

For this purpose, I have been to Azerbaijan very recently in November. I had
the opportunity to meet with Mr. Ilham Aliyev and members of the Azeri
government. We set forth several proposals to increase the trade turnover,
including but not limited to off-set arrangements, establishment of joint
transportation companies, improving railway transportation facilities by
construction of Kars-Tbilisi railroad. Accordingly, we also agreed with
Azerbaijan on the development of an Economic Development Strategy.

We should also point out that our performance in the fields of construction
and direct investments has been even more impressing.

Today, Turkish companies invested more than 1.6 billion dollars in various
sectors of the Azerbaijani economy. There are more than 800 Turkish
companies operating in Azerbaijan, and they are the biggest foreign investor
in the sectors other than oil extraction and processing. Similarly, our
direct investments in Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan is around 2,5 billions
USD.

Concerning the construction and contracting services, the total amount of
projects undertaken in Central Asia reached 12 billion dollars at the end of
2004. The Turkish companies have completed 5.5 billions USD worth of
projects in Turkmenistan, 3.5 billions dollars worth of project in
Kazakhstan and 1.6 billions USD worth of projects in Azerbaijan.

What does mean for Turkey the rea- lization of mega-projects
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan named after Heydar Aliyev and Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum?

– Turkey stands as an important energy partner for Caspian Sea countries,
Europe and the projects being developed in the region opens a new area for
cooperation for the countries.

Located at a crucial geopolitical region, Turkey will become a natural
bridge between the energy rich countries of the Caspian region, Central
Asia, the Middle East and the European markets. In other words, the Turkish
route could be the fourth artery of natural gas for Europe after Russia,
Norway and North Africa. It should be noted that EU gas demand is expected
to increase by around 40% until 2020. This is a new area of cooperation
between Turkey and the rest of Europe, which is looking for ways to expand
and diversify its energy sources.

This is no coincidence because the gap in world’s energy supply and demand
is one of the key elements, which determines energy policies. With its
emerging and rapidly growing economy, Turkey is facing a rising growth of
its demand for energy by 8% per annum whereas the world average is 1.8%. On
the other hand, the Caspian region’s oil and gas potential has attracted
much attention. The potential of the Caspian basin is estimated to be
179-195 billion barrels of oil and 157-186 trillion cubic meters of natural
gas.

The landlocked countries of the Caspian basin aim at ensuring sustainable
and continuous flow of revenues from exporting oil and gas to finance their
economic and social development. Moreover, oil consuming countries and
foreign investors are searching for viable export routes for the projec- ted
production.

Turkey, straddling the Caspian basin and Europe, forms a natural energy
bridge between the source-rich countries of the Caspian basin and the
energy-hungry world markets. Due to its geographical location and being the
biggest energy importer of the area, Turkey casts itself as an energy hub in
its region. As one of the biggest investors in the region and having close
historical, cultural and economic ties with the countries of the region,
Turkey acts not only along with its commercial interest but also bears the
responsibility for supporting these nations in their social and economic
development.

The EU Commission published on November 2000 the Green Paper titled “Working
towards a European strategy for the security of energy supply”, which put
emphasis on uninterrupted flow of gas through secured and diversified
external energy. It underlined Turkey’s role in this respect. Indeed, the
Turkish energy strategy is to transform Turkey into a major consumption and
transport terminal in the Mediterranean.

It is with these considerations that the East-West Energy Corridor project
was ela- borated. The East-West Energy Corridor concept is mainly based on
the construction of trans-Caspian and trans-Caucasian oil and gas pipelines
traversing Georgia and ending in Turkey. The East-West Energy Corridor
essentially aims at transporting the Caucasian and Central Asian energy
resources to the Western markets through safe and alternative routes. The
East-West Energy Corridor project mainly comprises the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
(BTC) Crude Oil Pipeline, South Caucasian Natural Gas Pipeline
(Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum Natural Gas Pipeline) and Turkmenistan-Turkey-Europe
Gas Pipeline projects.

The third and last phase, namely the construction stage of the BTC project
was launched on 10 September 2002 and the groundbreaking ceremony took place
on 18 September 2002 at Sangachal, Azerbaijan.

Another project, which constitutes an important part of the East-West Energy
Corridor, is the South Caucasian Pipeline project, which is to ship
Azerbaijani natural gas from the Shah Deniz field to Turkey via the
Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum route. The construction has started and natural gas
will flow in 2006.

The participation of Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan to the East-West-Energy
Corridor will assist the trans-Caspian states in their integration to
Western economies and further contribute to regional cooperation. Turkey
will in the long term become a junction for the natural gas pipelines
originating from all neighboring countries. We are already delivering
natural gas from Russia and Iran. Projects from Iraq, Syria and Egypt are
also under consideration.

How do you see the future of Turkey’s economy? What’s the relations with
EU’s countries, which projects are fulfilled, what about their realization?

– Turkey’s economic performance targets for year 2005 are as follows:

– Expected GDP growth rate is 4,8% and expected GNP growth rate is 5%. GNP
is expected to reach 298,4 billion dollars and GNP per capita 4.128 dollars.

– By the end of 2005, increasing rates of both Production Price Index (PPI)
and Consumer Price Index (CPI) are expected to fall to 8%.

About the foreign trade performance; exports are expected to reach 75
billion dollars while the value of expected imports are 104 billion dollars.
Hence, trade volume would be about 180 billion dollars and foreign trade
deficit would be about 29 billion dollars. It is expected that the ratio of
current account deficit to GNP would be 3,6% in absolute value.

Turkey’s economy will be one of the ten biggest economies in the world in
the next 15-20 years. If Turkey grows by 6% per year, Turkey’s GDP is
estimated to be 1,3 trillion dollars by 2023. This target is realistic
because Turkey has proved in the last 3 years that as long as structural
reforms are established, the growth rate can be quite high (average growth
rate for the last 20 years was 4,5%). This growth is the key to low
unemployment and equal income distribution.

Foreign trade is one of the main contributors to job creation and growth.
Turkey’s export is estimated to be 500 billion dollars and import is
estimated to be 600 billion dollars by 2023. Turkey has achieved a better
performance in the last 3 years. We have many advantages to achieve this
target.

These advantages can be summarized as follows:

– The production process in Turkey has been transforming through more
productive and competitive techniques. This transformation is valid also for
the export of Turkey. Turkey’s industrial structure is highly flexible and
can easily adapt to new technologies.

– With the stabilization of the economy and the accession to the EU, foreign
direct investment inflow will increase substantially.

– Turkey’s young and highly educated labor force is another key for high
growth and structural transformation.

– Turkey is cooperating with many regional countries through regional
agreements (such as Black Sea Region Economic Cooperation) and bilateral
agreements.

– Turkey is geographically close to the high-income countries of EU.

– Turkey’s domestic market is likely to create high demand for both domestic
and foreign goods.

– Turkey is a gateway for goods and energy trade between West and East.

When it comes to EU, relations with the EU are inevitably high on our
agenda. Turkey is passing through an important period in its relations with
the EU. The EU has recently decided on the launch of accession negotiations
with Turkey in October 2005. We expect the screening process that will
precede the negotiations to start soon.

We are definitely aware of the fact that the negotiating process will be a
long and challenging one. However, I can assure you that political
leadership and the administration as well as the civil society in Turkey
possesses the determination and ability necessary to reach the end of this
road.

A great degree of the EU experience has already been accumulated in Turkey
during the course of the 41-year association relationship. I believe,
Turkey’s achievements as a Customs Union partner and a candidate country in
the past ten years prove that Turkey is able to properly conduct the
accession negotiations and successfully reach the ultimate aim of accession.

We are very pleased with what has been achieved in economic integration on
both sides. The Customs Union was an ambitious target. We achieved it in
1996 without significant financial assistance from the EU. This is an
indication of our ability to compete economically.

Furthermore, economic restructuring program backed by the IMF has been in
place since 1999. It introduced the necessary reforms that pave the way for
complying with the Maastricht criteria. We will see the economic and
political stability consolidated definitively once the accession
negotiations are started and are on their way.

Once accession negotiations are launched, Turkish economy will thrive even
more. Foreign direct investment will improve because of the necessary
implementation of EU standards and the further consolidation of Turkey’s
political and economic stability.

Turkish membership would one day offer tremendous opportunities to countries
in its region. Turkey will be a bridge between Caucasus and Central Asia on
the one part, and Europe on the other.

Ankara Agreement signed in 1963 with the EU drew the framework of Turkey-EU
financial cooperation. Under this legal framework, in order to encourage
Turkey’s economic and social development, between 1964 to 1981, three
subsequent Financial Protocols were signed and an amount of v 680 million
was committed to Turkey from European Investment Bank (EIB) loans and EU
loans at a reduced interest rate.

Financial assistance governed by financial protocols included grants and
credits that constituted mostly of the European Investment Bank resources.
Financial assistance of the EU was directed to the projects related to
infrastructure and industry investments. 63% of the EU assistance was used
in this period.

After the establishment of the Custom Union, EU increased the funds
available considering the needs of Turkey. Within the framework of the
Association Council Decision no 1/95 on Customs Union; EU projected the
financial support to “MEDA, grants and credits mostly from EIB) and EU
budget”. 33% of the EU assistance was used in this period.

In the post-Helsinki period, the European Commission has taken a number of
decisions to increase the financial assistance. In this period, all funds
for Turkey were considered as pre-accession oriented. In this period,
Turkey’s allocation has been doubled and amounts now to 899 million euro in
grant aid (administered by the Commission) and 1.470 million euro in loans
(administered by the EIB).

At the moment, there are several projects that are being financed by the EU
funds. These projects are directed towards the adoption of the EU
legislation and Turkey’s compliance with the economic criteria for
membership. “Development of a clustering policy for the SME’s” and
“Establishing a RAPEX like system for a more safer free movement of goods”
are the most important two projects maintained by the Undersecretariat of
Foreign Trade. Moreover, there exist another clustering project with The
General Secretariat Of Istanbul Textile & Apparel Exporters’ Associations
(ITKIB) focusing on textile sector. The aim of both clustering projects is
to increase the competitiveness of the SME’s in the global world market. We
also arranged for a project namely as “support of the quality
infrastructure” which is coordinated with KalDer – Turkish Society for
Quality.

Is there enough contract and legal base in Turkish-Azerbaijan economy
cooperation?

– The legal framework of the trade and economic relations between Turkey and
Azerbaijan has been completed. There are numerous agreements covering the
various aspects of our bilateral relations, including trade, customs,
transportation, investments, and taxation among others. We recently signed
the Long Term Economic Cooperation Agreement in May 2004 and in the mean
time, in accordance with this Agreement. We are communicating with the
Azerbaijan government for preparing the Implementation Plan.

In the long term, in accordance with our international obligations, we also
aim to conclude a free trade agreement, liberalizing completely the trade
between our countries.

Therefore, the legal framework is ready and available and it is time to
benefit from this framework.

Thanks for your interview.