Ministry cancels world-famous Armenian violinist’s concert as frequent bans spark outrage in Turkey

Turkey’s Ministry of Culture and Tourism has canceled a concert by Spanish-Armenian violinist Ara Malikian in Ankara on June 11 without specifying the reason amid outrage over local administrations’ bans on an increasing number of concerts across the country over the past two weeks, Turkish Minute reported.

More than a dozen events, including concerts and university music festivals, have been canceled by local administrations on various pretexts since mid-May in moves seen by many as attempts by the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government to interfere in people’s lifestyles and to try to force its Islamic values on the nation.

In one of the latest incidents, a concert by Malikian, which was to be held at the Presidential Symphony Orchestra Concert Hall on June 11 as part of the “Cultural Road Festival” organized by the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, was canceled on Thursday, with the people who bought tickets for the event informed about the cancellation with a message specifying no reason, according to local media reports.

The ban came after Malikian was targeted by Turks on social media due to earlier remarks defining the mass killings of Armenians over a century ago as “genocide,” although Turkey categorically rejects the 1915-16 killings of more than a million Armenians as genocide.

The recent bans on concerts across Turkey have drawn criticism from musicians, actors, bar associations and human rights activists.

“I can’t accept the increasing number of concert and festival cancellations, and the discriminatory and hateful statements about people’s lifestyles, particularly concerning female musicians,” famous Turkish pop singer Mabel Matiz tweeted on Friday.

Prominent Turkish actor Genco Erkal also said, addressing the ruling AKP, that they had “come to the end of the road” if they started to ban concerts in an attempt to silence the artists with various excuses.

Erkal was implying that President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and his AKP would likely see a defeat in the general and presidential elections scheduled for 2023.

Public surveys show Erdoğan and his election ally, the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP), losing considerable public support.

Releasing a written statement on Friday, the İstanbul Bar Association said the cancellation of concerts and festivals was a violation of the constitution and aimed to “take away our right to live, our right to listen to the music we want and to attend the concerts of the artists we want … in short, our right to live freely and decide freely about our lives.”

The Diyarbakır Bar Association also issued a statement on the bans, saying that those responsible for the bans discussing the cancellations based on such differences as language, culture and lifestyle within the context of “national and moral values” would “undoubtedly deepen the social polarization.”

“It’s not possible to accept in a democratic order those who exercise public power and are in a decision-making position going beyond the limits of the law to ignore the freedom of _expression_ of the artists and target them due to their … language, clothing and musical styles,” they added.

“We don’t accept these outdated restrictions and prohibitions that have become systematic. We won’t allow you to prevent artists, especially female artists, from engaging in their professions as they wish in this country!” the Women’s Platform for Equality (EŞİK) also said in a statement on Friday.

Take a second to support Stockholm Center for Freedom on Patreon!

Home Is Better: The Hungary-Ukraine border shows it makes more sense to care for refugees in their own region

 Center for Immigration Studies

By Mark Krikorian on

When I visited the Hungary-Ukraine border last week, it was much quieter than during the first weeks after the Russian invasion, when thousands of people a day poured out of train cars into the small Hungarian border town of Zahony. But there were still some lessons to be learned.

More than 700,000 Ukrainians have entered Hungary since the February 24 start of the war, of whom some 200,000 remain, according to an embassy source I spoke with this week. Many, of course, moved on to other countries in the European Union. But, as I learned last week, many others have returned to Ukraine.

On the four-hour train ride from Budapest to Zahony, I was seated near a Russian-speaking Ukrainian woman with two obstreperous youngsters and two enormous suitcases. My college Russian has mostly abandoned me, but I was able to ask where she was going and she told me home, to Kiev. With Russian troops having withdrawn from around the capital, and the war focused mainly in the eastern part of the Ukraine, the city is no longer under immediate threat. But when I told her it didn't seem safe, and she simply said "home is better".

When we arrived at the station I saw there were many others headed back as well, more than the number arriving from the east. (Poland, which received the largest number of Ukrainians, is seeing the same return flow.) A Red Cross volunteer in Zahony told me about a Chinese student studying in Kiev who returned recently, saying he couldn't wait any longer because he had final exams to take. And the volunteer said that someone had recently come through who was actually on his way back to Donetsk, the major city in the disputed eastern part of the country. He told the volunteer that while there was still fighting in the villages in the region, the city, firmly under the control of the Russian-backed separatist government, was safe enough for him to return.

An Armenian friend told me that the same kind of thing happened several years ago with Armenians who'd fled Aleppo, the main area of Armenian settlement in Syria, during that country's civil war. Many spent several months in Yerevan, capital of the Armenian republic, where they'd fled for refuge, but went back even though the war was still raging. As he wrote me, "People want to live in their homes…Even though conditions in Syria were bad, they were returning to their homes. They didn't need to pay rent at the very least."

The lesson for U.S. policymakers is that caring for refugees in the region where they've found initial refuge is almost always preferable to resettlement thousands of miles away. The Ukrainian woman in Hungary who decided to return to Kiev had only to pack up and buy a train ticket. Her counterparts who have flown to Mexico, crossed the U.S. border, and gone to join relatives in Sacramento, on the other hand, are unlikely ever to return, and even if they wanted to, it would be a long and expensive ordeal.

As the Center's research has shown, resettling a single refugee in the United States burns through money that could have supported a dozen people in their own region. Whatever funds we spend on refugee protection should be focused almost exclusively on helping people where they are, not assisting them to move permanently across the ocean. Doing so is both less expensive – allowing many more to be helped – and makes it easier for people to return when the emergency is over.

Other observations. The Tisza River marks this section of Hungary's post-World War II border with Ukraine. Although it's not especially wide, it's more "grand" than many stretches of the Rio Grande that I've visited. And it can be dangerous – a local journalist told me that a number of people have drowned trying to swim across it to Hungary. That's not because Hungary prevents the entry of Ukrainians; they've long had visa-free access to the EU for up to 90 days, even before the war. Rather, the victims were military-age men, who are barred from leaving by Ukrainian authorities in case the need arises to press them into service. That underlines one of the most noticeable differences between the recent Ukrainian refugee flow and the 2015 crisis – seven years ago, the vast majority of Syrians (and "Syrians") pouring into Europe were military-age men, while virtually all the Ukrainians are women and children.

On a lighter note, right near the river was a farm with some of the famous Hungarian Mangalitsa pigs – that have fur. They're also delicious.Since the flow is now mainly back into Ukraine, I asked an Italian aid worker in Zahony whether the humanitarian infrastructure there was really still needed. There was a former school converted into a shelter, that sat empty. The tent dining hall, operated by World Central Kitchen (a project of Spanish-born U.S. celebrity chef Jose Andres), was likewise virtually empty at lunchtime. The Jewish Agency setup in the train station had few takers. The Hungarian Red Cross, and the volunteers from the Spanish Red Cross, had little to do. And in general there seemed to be more aid workers than there were Ukrainians to give aid to. But the Italian aid worker told me that, while the number of volunteers has dropped off, they were keeping the infrastructure in place for now, because the war could still flare up and move west, creating new flows of people leaving.

Police deny using disproportionate force, say strongest measure taken so far was merely use of shields

Save

Share

 11:30, 18 May, 2022

YEREVAN, MAY 18, ARMENPRESS. The Deputy Police Chief of Armenia Colonel Ara Fidanyan denies accusations that the police are using disproportionate force against the anti-government demonstrators in Yerevan.

He even said that so far the police haven’t even used any special riot control measures, with the exception of one case when officers had to equip themselves with shields.

At a session of the parliamentary committee on defense and security affairs, the Chair of the Committee Andranik Kocharyan asked Fidanyan whether or not Yerevan is “paralyzed”, something the leaders of the opposition demonstrators vowed to achieve by blocking streets.

“Naturally, neither the city nor any state body is paralyzed,” Colonel Fidanyan said.

The civil disobedience actions are ongoing for nearly 20 days in Yerevan, and Fidanyan said they haven’t even deployed any special measures with the exception of one case. “And these special measures were merely the shields. The police haven’t deployed any special measures,” the colonel said, addressing accusations that the officers are using disproportionate force.

US Ambassador says it’s possible to emphasize role of Karabakh population in determining its future

NEWS.am
Armenia –

The US Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to Armenia Lynne Tracy answered the question of journalists, including Armenian News - NEWS.am.

In your interview with Armenpress, you mentioned that the US recognizes the role of the people of Nagorno Karabakh in determining its future. How do you think that role should be expressed?

What really important right now is to emphasize this principle. I don't want to speculate on how this looks in the future. This is something for the people of Nagorno-Karabakh and the other parties to decide as they move forward with the negotiations.

In the same interview, you also talked about democracy in Armenia. Today during the Armenian democracy forum, journalists were not allowed to enter the meeting to cover the work of the forum. We see today's actions against opposition MPs, the actions against the police, and protesters. And many believe that the United States and the US embassy are guided by double standards and are silent in today's cases. Why is that?

I don't think we have been silent. We have already spoken out in Washington and here that we call on the police to act appropriately, to avoid excessive force.
We also call on the protesters, who have the right to demonstrate peacefully, to also conduct themselves in a peaceful manner.
And we certainly call on all parties on the streets, the police and the protesters, to respect the rights of journalists to cover these events and not interfere with the work of journalists.

And I see that there have already been complaints filed. And I also see the police have committed to investigating these complaints. I think that's very important, that is what democracy is about, it is about accountability. 

As I said in some of my remarks in the forum, democracy is not a state of perfection. We see in many democracies, including in the United States, ongoing issues of the need to reform the police and hold the police accountable. 

But these kinds of developments and situations do not mean that there is no democracy. What they mean is that citizens have the right to ask for accountability and the government is responsible for investigating and providing transparency and that accountability. 

And as I said a few minutes ago, I remain very encouraged about Armenia's trajectory on the democratic path and we continue to work with the people of Armenia and the government of Armenia on this wider reform agenda to support democracy.

AW: Children of War

Wars end, but they always have a habit of returning. The people of Artsakh seem to be moving on with their lives with the expectation that whatever they rebuild can be destroyed again. While the impact of war is detrimental for all survivors, the tragedy takes a unique toll on the smallest, most vulnerable and purest members of society.

Children perceive the war and the new reality that emerged after the war in a different way. What does war have to do with children? How does it impact their maturity and their consciousness?

Basements

Children wake up in the morning in a warm bed and immediately race out to a cold and dark basement. This is their first encounter with the war. At first, it was a joy not to go to school the next day, but then there grew a longing for the same school, the same demanding teacher and a friend sitting on the bench.

At a young age, you hear the sounds of explosions, which initially resemble fireworks, but you feel that the reaction of adults is very different from the reaction of fireworks dedicated to New Year’s Eve or Independence Day. Everyone says it is a war, but what do you know about the war?

Marat in Stepanakert (Photo: Lika Zakaryan)

Marat said that war is the protection of the home. For him, the phrase “attack” did not exist, only defense. He said that he was going to grow up soon so that he could join the group of defenders. When asked why he does not want to choose another profession (doctor, policeman, musician, etc.), he said, “But what are the other professions needed for if the war comes again and everyone dies? First of all, the home must be protected so that people with other professions can live there.”

Mary in Stepanakert (Photo: Lika Zakaryan)

Mary’s dream was to see an end to the war so she could see her father again.  Some of the other children in the basements next to Mary had already lost their fathers. She said that the war would end for her when her father returned to hug her.

Loss of Home

When little Aram left his home in Shushi, he never imagined that would be the last time. His mother told him that they would be leaving for a short time and that they would soon return and live in Shushi again as they used to do before these explosions. “I miss our house very much…my clothes, our clothes… I miss our bicycle, and… Again I miss our clothes – our pants, blouses, we wore ours then…”

Aram in Stepanakert (Photo: Lika Zakaryan)

Aram’s sister Nora confesses that she cannot adapt to the new house and new conditions. “We do not have our home. I understand people have lost much more than this, but our house was so dear. I love Stepanakert, but Shushi will always be a dream for me. I am so connected with Shushi that it seems that my [body] part has been torn off and given to someone else. I promise that if one day Shushi is returned to us, I will walk from Stepanakert to Shushi, kissing every millimeter,” says Nora.

Because of the war, some displaced residents from the occupied territories of Azerbaijan remained in Armenia. Some moved to Russia, but most continue to live in Artsakh. The majority want to live in Stepanakert, but there are almost no vacant houses left in the capital today. Hotels, rental homes and even residences for the elderly are all occupied. It’s not uncommon to see entire families living in one room.

A displaced family from Shushi living in an elderly house (Photo: Lika Zakaryan)

Life in the Border Villages

Many children today live in border villages that used to be the center of Artsakh. For example, the village of Mkhitarashen has always been a favorite place for tourists, because it was through that village that they reached one of the most beautiful sites in Artsakh—the Umbrella Waterfall. During the summer season, children sold dried fruits, doshab and jams made by mothers and grandmothers to tourists. In this way, they helped members of the household earn money.

Umbrella Waterfall (Photo: Lika Zakaryan)

There is no school in Mkhitarashen, but the Artsakh government has provided a car for children in the village so they can attend school in the neighboring village of Shosh. Hayk says that the cars of Azerbaijanis were passing by their school. At first they were very scared, but now they seem to be adjusting. “Frankly, they were pointing bad things at us and using foul language, but we tried not to play in that area. Yes, now their snipers see us. We hear gunshots at night, but we try to calm our mothers down, because they are very worried about us. What can we do? This is our reality now. We cannot leave our village.”

Hayk in Mkhitarashen (Photo: Lika Zakaryan)

Injury

But children grow up one way or another. Life goes on, but how does the war affect them? This situation was a little different during the first Artsakh War. The Azeris were constantly bombing Stepanakert from Shushi. Forty bombs came out of the weapon called GRAD. The residents already knew that when the forties were over, they would have half an hour of free time, as the weapons needed to be recharged. The children would use this time to go down to the yard and play with friends. 

One day, Arman did the same. Someone new had come to their yard, a refugee from Baku. Arman and his two friends started fighting with the newcomer; one of them bit him. When he got up, he ran home, calling his father so that he could come and take revenge on the children in this yard. Arman’s two friends decided to run away in fear, but Arman stayed to take responsibility for his actions. At that moment, an explosion was heard again, but it exploded where the two children had fled. Arman, who was left to answer for what he had done, survived, but was hurt. His memory is vague, but he does recall how his grandparents carried him and ran to the hospital. He remembers how he set foot in the hospital, the ground of which was completely covered with blood, and how he felt that blood and its smell. He lost a part of his lungs. A few days later, the young Baku refugee and his father came to see Arman; the father thanked Arman for sending his child home.

Today Arman is 37 years old, and it has become a life lesson for him that we should always be responsible for what we do.

A Lost Childhood

Regardless of their will, children are always affected by war. Children are usually deprived of the empathy, care and undivided attention of adults who love them. In times of war, the separation from parents or their loss, unavailability and depression, lead to significant and frequent disruption in their attachments.

Children are also deprived of education. This is one of the most damaging effects of war. In 2020 after a long break caused by COVID-19, children finally started attending school again in the middle of September; two weeks later, the war broke out.

Ultimately, the war destroyed the local economy, industries, jobs and infrastructure, which caused financial problems in families. Children were left to find work or look after their siblings, instead of studying and focusing on their schoolwork. 

As displaced persons, children, who are the most vulnerable to post-traumatic stress disorder, wait for years to return to normalcy while living in extremely difficult circumstances.

They worry about food and clothes. They hear parents talking about lack of money and teach themselves to get used to that kind of life, not to want more and not to get disappointed. They learn the words “disappointment” and “pain” very early.

These children of Artsakh have gone their own way. They have grown up too soon and seen too much. Many of them dream of becoming soldiers to defend their country, while others dream of becoming doctors to heal the pains of war.

A displaced child from Hadrut region, Khnatsakh village (Photo: Lika Zakaryan)

Lika (Anzhelika) Zakaryan is a freelance journalist from Stepanakert. She studied political science at Artsakh State University and holds a master's degree. She then graduated from the Peace Work Institute organized by YMCA Europe with a non-formal education degree in two years, where she studied in-depth conflict management and peacebuilding methods. Lika worked in a rehabilitation center as a social worker, as well as in the Artsakh Ministry of Culture, Youth and Tourism as a project manager and social media manager. She's also worked at a Montessori school in Würzburg, Germany, as a coach on conflicts and peacebuilding. At the same time, she received a year of training at the local Jubi Grenzenlos organization on conflicts and peacebuilding. She returned to Artsakh and took civic journalism courses for 10 months, during which time she started working for CivilNet. Lika is the author of the book 44 Days: Diary From An Invisible War.

Turkish press: Mighty sovereigns of Ottoman throne: Sultan Abdülhamid II

This old photo shows Sultan Abdülhamid II, the 34th ruler of the Ottoman Empire. (Wikimedia / Edited by Büşra Öztürk)

Born in 1842, Sultan Abdülhamid II was the son of Sultan Abdülmecid and Tîrimüjgan Kadınefendi. When he was 10 years old, his mother of Circassian descent died of tuberculosis. He received a good education and training from distinguished teachers in the palace. During the reign of his father and uncle, he lived a comfortable and free life in his mansion in Maslak.

Abdülhamid ascended the throne as the 34th Ottoman sultan and 99th Islamic caliph at the age of 34, after his elder brother, Sultan Murad V, was deposed due to his illness in 1876. He had promised a constitution to those who enthroned him. He kept his word.

The first Ottoman constitution, Kanun-i Esasi, was proclaimed and Parliament convened. The Ottoman Empire turned into a constitutional monarchy. However, Sultan Abdülhamid reigned as a symbolic ruler for the first two years as the power was actually in the hands of the military and civilian bureaucrat coup plotters who enthroned him.

A cover of the Ottoman constitution of 1876. (Wikimedia)

When Sultan Abdülhamid ascended the throne, a rebellion and military actions against it continued in the Balkans. When Russia intervened in the incident, European states organized a conference in Istanbul. At the conference, the Ottoman government was offered to make reforms in Rumelia; but the proposal was rejected.

Leading pro-constitution statesman Mithat Pasha, who also served briefly as Sultan Abdülhamid’s grand vizier, favored going to war with Russia. To achieve this goal, he urged people to take to the streets and hold demonstrations in favor of the war. He thought Britain would help, but he was wrong. Eventually, Mithat Pasha was sacked in January. Three months later, the 1877 Ottoman-Russian War resulted in one of the greatest disasters in Turkish-Islamic history.

In order to alleviate the damage of the war, the sultan asked for help from England. Britain agreed to help in return for a base in Cyprus. With the Treaty of Berlin signed in 1878 under these conditions, a great portion of the Ottoman lands were lost and a heavy war compensation was mandated. This treaty lies behind almost all of the Egypt, Eastern Rumelia, Crete, Macedonia and Armenian issues that took place during the reign of Sultan Abdülhamid. Without understanding this treaty, one cannot judge on this era and the political value of the sultan.

Sultan Abdülhamid II, who held Parliament and the government responsible for this catastrophe, dissolved Parliament and ruled the country from the palace for 30 years like his grandfather Sultan Mahmud II. Thus, the constitution remained in effect but the regime of the state was reverted to absolute monarchy.

The sultan brought the unsolved death of his deposed uncle, Sultan Abdülaziz, to court in 1881. This court, which included the most famous jurists of the time, concluded that Sultan Abdülaziz was murdered. He sentenced the perpetrators, including Mithat, Rüştü, Damat Mahmud Celaleddin and Damat Nuri pashas, and Sheikh al-Islam Hayrullah Efendi, to death. The sultan, who never liked violence and never applied the death penalty, did not approve of these punishments and instead had them banished.

The meeting of the first Ottoman Parliament. (Wikimedia)

Ismail Pasha, the governor of Egypt, could not pay the heavy debt he took for the reconstruction of his country and the construction of the Suez Canal. Thereupon, Britain bought half of the channel shares. An English minister of finance and a French minister of public works were appointed. When they started to demobilize the Egyptian army over financial savings, an officer named Urabi led a rebellion in 1879. The sultan dismissed Ismail Pasha and appointed Tevfik Pasha as the Khedive. But when Urabi expelled the European officials, Britain, seeing that the road to India was in danger, invaded Egypt in 1882.

Taking advantage of these disturbances, France landed soldiers in Tunisia in 1881. The Ottoman government did not accept the occupation of Tunisia, which in fact had been out of the control of the central government for years. Libya was closely tied to the central administration and a significant amount of soldiers were stationed there.

Sultan Abdülhamid II wanted both to restore the reputation of the treasury and prevent further trouble to the state over the foreign debts that were promised to be repaid under a payment program stipulated by the Treaty of Berlin that ended the war. First of all, he made an agreement with the bankers and made them agree to a plan to pay the domestic debts in 1879.

Then, the sultan made an agreement with foreign creditors by diverting the revenues of the state's alcohol, fish, salt, silk, tobacco and stamp taxes as collateral. In return, the debts were reduced by half. For this purpose, the Düyun-i Umumiyye (Ottoman Public Debt Administration) was established in 1881. Although this was not in line with the financial independence of the state, it was a very important and beneficial gain for the bankrupt state as the total debt was reduced to by more than half, the pretext for a major intervention was eliminated, and finally the financial reputation was restored. This also made positive contributions to the economy and financial administration.

The Ottoman-Greek war, which started in 1897 after Greece landed troops in Crete, ended with the victory of the Ottoman army. The Ottoman troops crossed the Thermopylae Pass in 24 hours, despite foreign military experts earlier saying it cannot be passed in six months, and arrived on the outskirts of Athens. Great powers intervened and peace was restored. The Ottoman Empire did not gain anything in this war, and its finances fell into a serious crisis. This crisis shook the sultan's reign.

A Greek painting of the Battle of Velestino during the Greco-Turkish War of 1897. (Wikimedia)

The Treaty of Berlin Treaty stipulated that the Armenians in Anatolia be given autonomy. The government neglected the application of this provision on the grounds that the Armenian population did not constitute the majority anywhere, unlike the Balkan peoples. Russia started to provoke a revolt among Armenians by establishing Dashnak (left-wing) and Hunchak (social democrat) parties and forming militias.

From 1894 onward, tensions began to arise between the Armenian and Muslim communities. There were massacres, looting and destruction. The security forces were incapable of preventing these. In 1896, Armenian militias raided the Ottoman Bank. In 1905, an attempt was made to assassinate the sultan. The incident got tangled up. Although Sultan Abdülhamid II was not directly involved, he was called the Red Sultan.

The Zionists, who began settling in Palestine beginning from the early 1880s, offered the payment of Ottoman debts in return for allowing the establishment of an autonomous Jewish homeland in Palestine in 1901. Sultan Abdülhamid rejected this offer and restricted Jewish immigration to Palestine as a precautionary measure.

Sultan Abdülhamid, knowing the difficulties endured by the state, tried to get along with all states with a fine-tuned diplomacy. He benefited from the balance of power between Britain, Russia and Germany. At the same time, he tried to use the influence of the caliphate to give the state a reputation and a sense of security to the Muslims of the world. He struggled through diplomatic means to have played against Islam or the Ottomans banned from the stages in Europe, and he succeeded.

The sultan commissioned madrassas and mosques in towns where Muslims lived all over the world. He sent aid and money to scholars. In order to undermine the influence of the caliphate, Britain, through Jamal al-Din al-Afghani, propagated in the Arab world that the caliphate of the Ottoman sultans was not legitimate. The sultan's policy, which embraced traditional Islam and opposed modernism, also faced hostility from some clergymen.

Sultan Abdülhamid founded a modern intelligence agency in 1880 as he witnessed several coups and assassination attempts. The sultan followed an intense espionage movement at home and abroad through the journals provided to him. He forbade publishing newspapers and books insulting religion, against individuals, violating public order and against foreign states in a manner that disrupts political relations. Apart from this, it is a fabrication of his opponents that censorship was applied in fear of words such as freedom, Parliament, or Murad.

The sultan introduced the principle that religious books should be presented to a committee of scholars before they were published and a license should be obtained. He had the illegal printing houses tracked down and had the books they printed without permission destroyed. Later, this would be used against his opponents as "he had religious books burned."

A photo of Sultan Abdülhamid II. (Wikimedia)

Sultan Abdülhamid did not want to interfere in other countries' matters, as he did not want interference in his own internal affairs. For this reason, newspapers were asked to behave respectfully to European states and their ambassadors, not to criticize the policies of foreign governments unless there was a special warning, and not to humiliate others while glorifying Islam. For example, when the whole world rejoiced when Japan defeated Russia, Ottoman newspapers acted impartially.

In publications for Muslim peoples living under Western imperialism, the call was for the direction of embracing Islam, not rebellion. Instead of political opposition, newspapers had made it their duty to enlighten the public and increase reading habits. Serialized novels, poems, cultural articles, humor articles and travel notes increased. Thus, newspapers created new literary items. As a matter of fact, there were newspapers with a circulation of 30,000 in Istanbul, which had a population of 500,000 at the time.

During the period of relative peace that lasted for 30 years, Sultan Abdülhamid focused on education and development activities. The activities carried out in his time would fill volumes of books. In 1879, the judiciary was organized. Today, the judiciary organization in Turkey dates from that time.

In his time, the number of printing presses, books, magazines and newspapers increased tremendously. Secondary schools were established in every town, and high schools were established in big cities. Faculties, girls' schools of all degrees, art schools, and schools for students with hearing and speech disabilities were opened. Instead of sending students abroad, the sultan preferred to appoint foreign teachers. Many hospitals were built at his time, and museums and libraries were established.

Sultan Abdülhamid closely followed the scientific discoveries in the world. He immediately sent a medal and monetary reward to Louis Pasteur, who had found the vaccine for rabies. He attached great importance to photography. He would examine the photographs of those who would enter the civil service. He had photographs taken of all over the country and had albums prepared.

The sultan made serious efforts to strengthen the army. He brought experts from Germany. To replace the old ships that lost their war power, he had high-quality cruisers and battleships brought in from Europe to strengthen the navy. The fortifications he had commissioned around the Dardanelles were an important reason for the 1915 Çanakkale victory.

Chambers of agriculture, industry and commerce were opened. The first modern census and statistics were carried out in his time. Many factories and workshops, ports and docks, clock towers, mines, dams and dikes were opened in the country. Official buildings began to appear all over the nation.

Sultan Abdülhamid II at Balmoral Castle in Scotland. (Wikimedia)

In addition to education and construction activities, public order and safety, deflation and prosperity were witnessed in the country. People never had a problem with the cost of living. Moreover, because of his respect for religion and traditions, the sultan was loved by the people.

Telegraph and railway lines were extended. Two railway projects named Hijaz and Baghdad, connecting Istanbul to Yemen and Basra, were launched. The length of railways increased to 1,993 kilometers (1,238 miles) in Rumelia and to 2,507 in Anatolia.

The sultan approached every element of the empire with paternal affection. As he handed over the administration of his personal treasury to the Armenian experts, he entrusted his security to the guard regiment composed of Albanians and Arabs as well as Turks. His personal servants were Circassians.

Sultan Abdülhamid established the Hamidiye regiments in the East as a precaution against a possible Russian invasion. He flattered the Kurds and have them attached to spiritual ties, so much so that he was called Bâve Kürdan (Father of the Kurds). He had a Tribal School opened for the education of the children of both Kurdish and Arab tribal chiefs and notables of the world's Muslims. He forbade the celebration of the conquest of Istanbul so that the Greek citizens would not be hurt.

The Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) was founded in Macedonia in 1889 and spread especially among the officer corps in Rumelia.

After the officers who could not receive their salaries for a long time and did not like the traditional politics of Sultan Abdülhamid revolted in Rumelia, in what would later come to be called the Young Turk Revolution, the sultan was forced to convene Parliament again in 1908. On the other hand, newspapers and books started to peddle propaganda against the sultan. Abdülhamid is one of the rare figures in history about whom there is a large negative literature, so much so that his mistakes were inflated or what he didn't do was shown as if they were done.

As a result of the political disintegration within the army, a counter-revolutionary rebellion broke out in Istanbul on April 13, 1909, bringing together CUP’s opponents, radical groups and disgruntled bureaucrats. The revolt, later came to be known as March 31 Incident, was suppressed by CUP-led troops brought in from Rumelia. The sultan was dethroned by the CUP-dominated Parliament and exiled to Salonica (Thessaloniki) under the pretext of this revolt, with the CUP or Britain rumored to be behind it. Yıldız Palace was looted by the soldiers. The movable and immovable properties of the sultan were confiscated by the CUP.

A portrait of Sultan Abdülhamid II. (Wikimedia)

Upon the fall of Salonica, the former sultan was brought to Istanbul in 1913 and imprisoned in the Beylerbeyi Palace. He was banned from meeting his family, going out and reading newspapers. He died from pneumonia on Feb. 10, 1918.

Sultan Abdülhamid II was medium height and thin. He was brown-haired with black eyes. His face and build carried the characteristic features of the Ottoman dynasty. He was intelligent, sensitive, gentle and dignified. His memory was sharp. He used to praise his relatives while fascinating the foreigners who met him with his sweet talk and kindness. He showed toughness when necessary as he could also easily placate his anger.

His voice was strong, he spoke calmly and clearly. He dressed and lived in a simple manner. He was generous. He understood well the era in which he lived, the morals and aptitudes of people, their moods and weak points. He tried to bind people to him with compliments, money, insignia and ranks.

Abdülhamid was a master carpenter, and his works are masterpieces of art. He used to run farms and mines when he was a prince. He had made a lot of money. He knew well that money was power. After ascending the throne, he rationally increased his wealth. He reduced his salary from the state. He used to cover the gifts he gave to people from his own wealth, and he also paid salaries from his own pocket to suspicious personalities that he had appointed to distant towns for political reasons.

He bought Palestine and the oil fields in Mosul and made them his personal property for political security reasons, which were later seized by the CUP and transferred to the state.

In his youth, he was very fond of sports. He was skilled in swimming, rowing, horseback riding and shooting. He also took great care of his health in his old age. He was very religious and cultured. He belonged to the Al-Shadhili (Şazeli) sect. He was survived by his sons Selim, Ahmed, Abdülkadir, Burhaneddin, Abdürrahim, Nureddin and Mehmet Abid, and his daughters Zekiyye, Naime, Naile, Şadiye, Ayşe and Refia.

A photo of Sultan Abdülhamid II. (Wikimedia)

Some foreigners described him as follows: British Prime Minister Benjamin D'Israeli: "Neither a dissolute, nor a tyrant, nor a zealot, nor an instigator. A just ruler who loves his nation and country.” British ambassador, Austen Henry Layard: “A very amiable, well-intentioned, gentle and humane person, ready to do whatever he can for the good of his subjects with pleasure.” British Ambassador Nicholas O'Conor: "The man who keeps the peace of Europe." French Ambassador Maurice Bompard: “There is no diplomat in Europe like him who knows foreign policy.” British Navy Lord John Fisher: “He is one of Europe's most adept and agile-minded diplomats.” British historian Joan Haslip: “History will one day write that he always worked for the happiness of his nation.”

Sultan Abdülhamid always used civilized methods in foreign policy and acted in very subtle and clever ways. He understood the importance of propaganda, which is the most effective means of power of our time, and tried to use it in the most effective way for not offensive but defensive purposes against imperialist and colonialist policies.

He struggled to survive on large lands, aiming to nullify many plots against him. Coups and assassinations have made his already prone character more suspicious. This suspicion, which should be considered normal under those conditions but exaggerated by some, was closely related to the tremendous political struggle for life going on around him. This suspicion was actually a policy and a tactic. Thus, he led his opponents in the wrong direction and misled them about his true purpose for a long time.

Knowing what he could do and what he could not do, he followed an honorable path in politics. He was not a person of minor ideas and circles, and acted with lofty purposes like his ancestors. In this way, many political dangers were eliminated with small concessions.

From the collapse of the great empire within 10 years after his departure, it is clear that Abdülhamid extended the state’s life by 30 years with his mistakes and merits. The Ottoman Empire, one of the five largest in the world at the time, turned into a third-world country in the next 10 years.

French lawmakers visit Armenian Genocide Memorial in Yerevan

Save

Share

 12:28, 3 May, 2022

YEREVAN, MAY 3, ARMENPRESS. The delegation led by Chair of the France-Armenia Friendship Group in the French Senate Gilbert-Luc Devinaz visited the Tsitsernakaberd Armenian Genocide Memorial in Yerevan on May 3.

The delegation was accompanied by Head of the Armenia-France Parliamentary Friendship Group Vladimir Vardanyan, the Parliament’s press office said.

The French deputies laid flowers at the Eternal Flame perpetuating the memory of the victims of the Armenian Genocide, observed a one-minute of silence and paid homage to the memory of the Holy Martyrs.

The guests also visited the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute, got acquainted with the documents certifying the Genocide.

The Chair of the France-Armenia Friendship Group Gilbert-Luc Devinaz left a note in the Memory Book.

Armenia improves positions in 2022 World Press Freedom Index

Save

Share

 15:09, 3 May, 2022

YEREVAN, MAY 3, ARMENPRESS. Armenia improved its positions in the 2022 World Press Freedom Index published by the Reporters Without Borders international organization.

This year Armenia is ranked 51st among 180 countries, but last year it was on the 63rd place.

Among regional countries Georgia is ranked 89th, Azerbaijan- 154th, Russia- 155th and Iran- 178th.

“The main news sources in Armenia are social networks, which two-thirds of the population access daily”, the report said, adding that since the 2018 Velvet Revolution, the media landscape has grown. “Despite a pluralistic environment, the media remain polarized. The country is facing an unprecedented level of disinformation and hate speech”, the report noted.

“The year 2021 was difficult for the media and for journalists because of the Nagorno-Karabakh war, scheduled elections and the pandemic”, stated in the report.

I decided to carry on with the family tradition of pursuing science. 10 questions to the scientist

Save

Share

 11:15, 4 May, 2022

YEREVAN, MAY 4, ARMENPRESS. Karen Trchunyan, Deputy Minister of Education, Science, Culture and Sports of the Republic of Armenia, is a promising young scientist, Doctor of Biological Sciences, and professor. He is an author and co-author of over 50 articles published in international science and technology repositories. The number of references to his studies is approximately 1300, H-index fluctuates within the range of 21-23, depending on the repository – Google Scholar, Web of Sciences, Scopus. Karen Trchunyan is one of the participants in the ADVANCE grant program by the Foundation for Armenian Science and Technology (FAST) and is engaged in a research project in the realm of biotechnology.

How did you make a decision to pursue science?

I used to dream of becoming an aircraft designer as I was fond of airplanes and anything related to them. I still like to study airplanes. We’ve got immense scientific traditions, both from paternal and maternal sides, and I represent the third generation of the scientific family. I, too, decided to carry on with the family tradition. My paternal grandfather Hambardzum Trchunyan worked in the Yerevan Computer Research Development Institute (known as the Mergelyan Institute) and had left Russia for Armenia with Sergey Mergelyan and other friends and had become one of the founders of certain scientific directions in the institute. My maternal grandfather Weller Vasilyan was the first biophysicist who defended his PhD dissertation in Armenia. Interestingly enough, I also studied and graduated from the Department of Biophysics of the Faculty of Biology. He ran the Scientific Research Institute for Plant Protection, being engaged in the creation of efficient biological ways to fight pests.

There is a curious pattern in fact; the research we’ve been conducting turns out to be related to both of my grandfathers’ scientific activities to a certain extent. One is of agricultural orientation, as was my maternal grandfather’s, while my paternal grandfather was a chemist who studied the interaction of certain metals and hydrogen. Both fields appeared to come together in me, completely by chance.

Did you have a role model of a scientist in the family? How did you envision a scientist?

In order to become a scientist, you’ve got to eagerly love what you do. The image of a scientist in my family was embodied by my father Armen Trchunyan who was also a biologist and created a notable scientific school, continued by his students, including me.

A scientist for me is a person who invents the new, contributes to the humanity with their hard intellectual work, builds an international network, visits foreign countries, shares experience, takes part in scientific debates. I have also gone through plenty of hardships in that respect; you need to prove and support your viewpoint with facts in scientific debates, whilst there are world-famous scientists who you need to illustrate and prove your viewpoint to, making them accept it.

Could you recall such an experience?

In 2010 our scientific team proved that the hydrogenase enzyme in intestinal villi is convertible and can work both ways. By that time, various international scientific research teams had proven the enzyme to work one way only and didn’t want to accept the fact. Our research data on hydrogenase conversion was a crucial event in biology and biochemistry. I first travelled to Germany with a research grant where I introduced our discovery to my supervisor Gary Sawers, who is a renowned specialist and has devoted all his life to enzyme research. Imagine a scientist from Armenia, claiming they have proven the opposite, though it was an addition to the before existing knowledge rather than an antagonistic discovery. The supervisor’s greatness consists in not turning anything into antagonism, but in welcoming additions and elaborating on the knowledge.  To our great delight, he came to accept it. We have been collaborating for a long time so far and our approach has been welcomed by Gary Sawers, as well as other renowned scientists. There are serious specialists in our scientific fields in the world – Michael Adams from the University of Georgia, USA, Gary Sawers from Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg in Germany, Rudolf K. Thauer from the Max Planck Institute in Frankfurt, and many other scientists whom we talked to and tried our best to comprehend each other’s approach, so to say, with a pen and paper or at the board. To our delight, they accepted our evidence and approach of ours, which is quite hard to get as you’re not a member of one of the best laboratories in the world to increase your chances to be right. As they say, knowledge wins in the end. In case you’re right, the result is there, even after having to overcome constant hardships. Indeed, there might be cases when you get the result, though it doesn’t get to be welcomed, for instance, out of envy as science is highly competitive.

Anyway, I enjoy such scientific debates as they give birth to the truth. Debates might be heated at times, but that’s merely because you want to have a say in science.

Unlike the rest of the interviewed scientists, you hold a state position as well. How do you manage to combine?

My educational background in natural sciences and being a scientist help gain confidence and freedom. That’s because science and the system you’ve passed through enable you to know your own mind, to be able to say yes or no in terms of administration. I coordinate the field of higher education, implementing my expertise and experience in day-to-day communication, both personal and job-related.

Due to my current business with a state position, the intensity of scientific activity has dropped, though I do keep on with it at the expense of my spare time, having published and still publishing scientific articles meanwhile. I do not view science as a job, it is rather a passion. Once you’ve passed a certain path, definite expectations are shaped not only on the local but also on the international level. Therefore, I am highly consistent in scientific results as our team has its niche in the world and everybody expects new studies and new results from us.

What was the most impressive discovery for you in your field?

My icon is Nobel Prize winner Peter D. Mitchell as he is one of the discoverers of the core principle of life. His discovery is extremely stimulating for me. Mitchell tried to comprehend how life works, how energy is generated, where it comes from, and how it is synthesized. Here is his book (reaches out to a book on the desk), sent to our laboratory personally by him. Given the fact he made his discoveries in the 1970s when none of the modern equipment was available, they become much more valuable. I like his approach of not only experimenting in order to get evidence but also hypothesizing possible mechanisms in nature to find evidence. Currently, we are trying to figure out whether fermentation occurs and works on the key principles of Mitchell’s theory and, if so, how they work. We’ve had much success in this, in 2019, after a lot of painstaking work, we published an article in a well-known journal Trends in Biochemical Sciences, referring to the principles of Mitchell’s chemiosmotic theory.

Would you please share your experience of participation in the ADVANCE grant program?

It is a highly riveting program as it establishes interdisciplinary connections among team members. The research team formed within the framework of the program does not focus on a single specialization. Instead, it makes use of the valuable knowledge of specialists from diverse realms. We used to do teamwork previously but this is interdisciplinary teamwork. We might know each other as individual scientists but had never got the chance to collaborate. I strongly believe that both international and Armenian science needs to be based on cooperation, emphasizing the development of our local science. The ADVANCE program is notable also because the team is led by world-famous scientist professor Garabed Antranikian (Germany) who shares his experience. The project we have selected cannot have instant results as it requires long-running experiments. Through the program, we managed to bring together diverse views and approaches within a single project, which is a huge contribution in terms to the formation of scientific culture in Armenia and among Armenian scientists.

What would you tell a child eager to become a scientist?

Never regret and never give up on your dreams.

Has there been any turning point in your career?

As I went in for chess and had quite good results, was a Category 1 player, I was considering a career in chess at some point. The 8th and 9th grades appeared to be that very turning point when I had to decide whether to become a professional chess player or to enter university. I gave up chess and opted for biology.

What motivates you to get up in the morning?

First off, that’s natural, I can’t help but wake up. If viewed philosophically, we get up to create or do something new. Moreover, when a person is engaged in education or science, educating and passing on knowledge to the younger generation becomes an indispensable part and the driving force of life.

What could be regarded as a career peak for you?

In case me and my research team achieve the goals, we’ve set and make the discovery we intend to, it would truly be our career peak. The reason is the research we’ve been conducting is of practical and universal significance. Hopefully, it will get to be appreciated with much-coveted scientific awards.

Previous interviews of the "10 questions to a scientist" series are below:

 

Nothing brings as much joy to a person as the feeling of the reward of a scientific result. Ani Paloyan

The story of Anoxybacillus karvacharensis found in the geothermal spring of Artsakh as a source of inspiration. Diana Ghevondyan

In an American lab 20 years ago I felt like in a Hollywood movie. Anna Poladyan

Science excelled all jobs because it is perspective: Sargis Aghayan

The easiest way to change the world is to do science: Sona Hunanyan



Armenian car hit by Azerbaijani truck in Artsakh, rolls down the gorge

Public Radio of Armenia
May 6 2022

On May 5, at about 13:30 a truck of the Azerbaijani motorcade hit an Armenian car on the opposite lane of the road, As a result, the car rolled down the gorge on the Drmbon- Martakert section of the highway.

Police officers arrived at the scene immediately after the incident. The driver and the two passengers were not seriously injured and their lives are not in danger.

The Artsakh Police say they are taking measures to reveal the circumstances of the case, the causes of the accident and the possibility of preventing it, to find out whether the collision was intentional or negligent.

Artsakh’s State Minister Artak Beglaryan called the incident a “deliberate crime by an Azerbaijani truck against an Artsakh civilian car.

The victims of this crime were TUMO Center employees in their mission of collecting more rural children for better education.