Trump is backing Oz’s Pa. Senate bid. Armenian Americans are skeptical.

NBC News
Allies of the Turkish American candidate have dismissed questions about his heritage as racist.
By 
WASHINGTON — Pennsylvania Senate hopeful Mehmet Oz has faced a barrage of questions and criticism from his Republican primary opponents about his initial refusal to relinquish his dual Turkish citizenship.

Oz relented and said he would give up his formal ties with Turkey.

But prominent leaders of a minority group argue that his ties to Turkey demand further scrutiny as Oz, the celebrity physician who picked up the endorsement of former President Donald Trump, competes in the crowded Senate race.

Allies have rejected questions about Oz’s Turkish heritage as racist and as dog whistles. But some Armenian American leaders say Oz has failed to adequately answer questions about a 100-year-old dispute over the mass deportations and massacres of Armenians in the early 20th century Ottoman Empire, widely characterized as genocide, a description Turkey vigorously disputes.

“No one in this community will ever vote for Dr. Oz,” said Mark Momjian, a prominent Philadelphia attorney and the former chair of the Armenian Center at Columbia University. “We are convinced that he is part of a denial campaign when it comes to the Armenian genocide.”

At the root of their opposition to Oz is Turkey's insistence that what happened during World War I wasn't genocide. It asserts that the number of deaths has been inflated and that those who died were victims of civil war.

It isn't unusual for foreign policy disputes to enter U.S. political races — for example, questions about China and Hong Kong or about Israel and the Palestinian territories have been fixtures in U.S. elections — but the race is emerging as the highest-profile example of the Old World fight’s being transmuted into American politics.

Momjian, who said all four of his grandparents were born in Turkey, said the issue isn’t about Oz's ethnicity but his lack of public acknowledgment that Turkey committed genocide.

“We have what our president has called a genocide taking place in real time in Ukraine,” Momjian said. “Having a U.S. senator who denies the truth of the Armenian genocide should be very concerning to anyone who cares about human rights.”

Oz, who was born in Ohio to Turkish parents and holds dual U.S.-Turkish citizenship, has faced criticism from his rivals in the May 17 Republican primary and others about whether he has “dual loyalties” to Turkey.

Oz has dismissed the question as “reminiscent of slurs made in the past about Catholics and Jews,” noting that President John F. Kennedy faced baseless accusations that he would be secretly loyal to the pope, while Jewish politicians have sometimes been subjected to similar questions about Israel.

To Americans of Armenian descent, Oz is a famous Turkish American who has, over his long public career, seemed uncomfortable condemning an atrocity that is as important to them as the Holocaust is to Jews.

“For the better part of the last 100 years, we have been trying to wrestle the memory of the Armenian genocide out of Turkey’s grip,” said Aram Hamparian, the executive director of the Armenian National Committee of America. “So when somebody is running for office who is close to the leader of that country, who has served in the military of that country — that’s a three-alarm fire.”

It took a century for the U.S. government to officially recognize an Armenian genocide — an atrocity Turkey has long denied despite the consensus of scholars and official recognition from more than 30 countries.

Now, Armenian Americans worry that Turkey's campaign to deny the slaughter of 800,000 to 1 million Armenians during World War I would have a powerful champion inside the U.S. government if Oz joins the Senate.

Asked for Oz’s view, campaign spokesperson Brittany Yanick said in a statement: “Dr. Mehmet Oz opposes genocide and the murder of innocent people in all forms.

“The evils of World War I should be commemorated,” Yanick continued. “Dr. Oz looks forward to those important discussions, as well as helping the three million people of Armenia today.”

His campaign’s response didn’t use the words "Armenian genocide."

While the episode known as the Armenian genocide isn’t well known to most Americans, the Ottoman Empire’s systematic destruction of its Christian minorities starting in 1915 paved the way to create an ethno-nationialist Turkish state.

MP Taguhi Tovmasyan calls for repeal of bill on allowing withdrawal of media accreditation by state bodies

Save

Share

 16:19,

YEREVAN, APRIL 15, ARMENPRESS. Member of Parliament Taguhi Tovmasyan, the Chair of the Parliamentary Committee on Human Rights and Public Affairs, organized a discussion with participation of journalists regarding the bill drafted by ruling Civil Contract party MPs on amending the Law on Mass Media.

The legislation drafted by Civil Contract’s Artur Hovhannisyan and Lilit Minasyan would empower state bodies to withdraw the accreditation of journalists if they are deemed to have violated “disciplinary rules” of relevant bodies.

The President of the Union of Journalists Satik Seyranyan opposed the bill, saying : “They had to clearly define the grounds for accreditation in order for the conduct of journalists to be predictable and that journalists know in which cases they could face withdrawal of their accreditation, otherwise the area is open and any government agency can arbitrarily decide and remove undesirable journalists or get rid of undesirable questions. They should’ve clearly mentioned the grounds in which case the accreditation can be withdrawn. There is a problem of the demand for the law’s certainty, the grounds aren’t clearly defined, therefore, if there are no grounds then with what will they be guided to make the decision on withdrawing the accreditation?”

Journalist Sevak Vardumyan concurred, saying he doesn’t know in which case he could face withdrawal of accreditation from parliament. “Suppose I laugh a bit loudly in the corridor or hit someone, or push the microphone too close to someone, will I get my accreditation revoked?”

Vardumyan also argued that this bill creates the opportunity of arbitrary decision-making for the relevant bodies.

The Chairman of the Committee for Protection of Freedom of Speech Ashot Melikyan also agreed. “This approach ought to be abandoned. The legislation should not provide for the suspension or withdrawal of a journalist’s accreditation.”

MP Tovmasyan in turn complained that the ruling party MPs aren’t holding discussions with the media representatives regarding legislations that concern them.

She said this problem must be regulated in the media sector. “Each editorial board should assume obligation, develop and publish rules of ethics for them, and the state bodies will be able to follow the maintenance of the rules which the media themselves developed,” she said.

Tovmasyan proposed to organize a petition and ask the government to issue a negative conclusion to the bill and also apply to the authors of the legislation with a request to revoke it.

Forecast: The prospects for the effectiveness of the new format for the peaceful settlement of the Artsakh conflict are rather vague

ARMINFO
Armenia –
David Stepanyan

ArmInfo.The prospects for the effectiveness, and indeed the very suitability of the new format for the peaceful settlement of the Artsakh conflict, are rather vague.  Chairman of the Armenian Constructive Party, political scientist  Andrias Ghukasyan, expressed a similar opinion to ArmInfo.

"The main change in the negotiation process was the actual removal of  the Russian Federation from the activities of the OSCE Minsk Group.  It is clear that the work of the format of the Minsk Group co-chairs  in the conditions of Moscow's violation of the UN Charter and the  Helsinki Final Act became impossible.  This brought the European  Union to the fore, creating an opportunity for forming a new  negotiating format.  Another question is that the 24-year stage of  discussion of the fundamental principles of the settlement within the  framework of the OSCE Minsk Group has also ended. That is, the  principles on the basis of which the conclusion of a comprehensive  peace treaty between Armenia and Azerbaijan was supposed to be  concluded. And this happened as a result of the decision taken in  Brussels to begin work on the preparation of a peace treaty," he  emphasized.

Meanwhile, according to the political scientist, from the latest  sensational speech of Prime Minister Pashinyan in parliament, it  becomes clear that these very fundamental principles of settlement by  the parties to the conflict are still not agreed upon. There is no  agreement around them, which makes it possible to forecast a very  difficult course of the expected negotiations. In Ghukasyan's  opinion, this is evidenced by the different interpretations by  Yerevan and Baku of the Brussels wording on the inclusion of all  necessary issues in the peace treaty that is being prepared for  signing. Thus, the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry hastened to declare  that the Artsakh settlement is outside the framework of the agreement  being prepared.  And Prime Minister Pashinyan outlined the  determination of the status of Artsakh as a condition necessary for  the signing of a peace treaty.

All this, according to the political scientist, outlines the fact of  the lack of agreement between the parties to the conflict around the  fundamental principles of the settlement, which creates very tangible  difficulties for the prospect of developing and approving the clauses  of the peace, making the possibility of a new format becoming a  platform for advancing the settlement even more uncertain. At the  same time, the importance of the EU's role in resolving the current  geopolitical conditions and the international situation, in his  opinion, is indisputable.

"And finally, the last important circumstance is the  interconnectedness of the role of the EU in the settlement, the  course of the settlement with the cooperation of Armenia and  Azerbaijan with the EU.  The interconnection, that exists since the  adoption in 2011 by the European Parliament of the decision to  conclude an Association Agreement with Armenia and Azerbaijan. At the  same time, as one of the preconditions for concluding this agreement,  Brussels put forward the consent of Yerevan and Baku to the  implementation of the Madrid principles for the settlement of the  conflict around Artsakh. And as of today the European Commission  cannot ignore the logic of the decisions taken earlier by the  European Parliament. The latter means the absence of drastic changes  in the position of the EU on the settlement of the Artsakh conflict  that preceded the latest events," Ghukasyan summed up. 

Sports: UEFA names Armenia’s FC Kumayri second best Amateur Club

Public Radio of Armenia
April 6 2022

UEFA has named Armenia’s FC Kumayri the second best Amateur Club 2021/22.

Belgian club FC Ik Dien, with almost 100 years of history, is the 2021/22 UEFA Grassroots Awards Best Amateur Club. Udruženje Respekt (Bosnia and Herzegovina) is the bronze medal winner.

Founded in 1924, Ik Dien, located in Edegem, take the gold award for their commitment to the local community, providing grassroots football for men, women, boys and girls, as well as staging their own Rainbow Month to promote diversity and equality among its 800 members.

FC Kumayri organizes activities in 20 communities in its local Shirak region, benefiting more than 250 disadvantaged boys and girls. The club uses football to promote integration, developing a multi-faceted approach to help children’s personal and social development. During the COVID-19 pandemic, FC Kumayri also provided online meetings with coaches and video materials to help players train at home.

About the UEFA Grassroots Awards

Since 2010, the UEFA Grassroots Awards have celebrated excellence beneath the elite levels of European football, highlighting the unsung heroes whose dedication allows the game to thrive and provides a foundation for the wider development of the sport.

Candidates are nominated by UEFA’s member national associations, with award winners selected by UEFA’s Executive Committee, following recommendations made by the organization’s Grassroots Panel and Development and Technical Assistance Committee.

International community continues to see NK conflict settlement within the framework of the OSCE MG – Mirzoyan

Save

Share1

 17:50, 8 April, 2022

YEREVAN, APRIL 8, ARMENPRESS. The international community continues to see the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict within the framework of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs, ARMENPRESS reports the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia Ararat Mirzoyan said at the April 8 press conference.

"The current geopolitical situation in the world has made the work of the OSCE Minsk Group, significantly complicated, but I am receiving signals from the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs and leaders of many other countries, and I want to confirm that although Azerbaijan's partners say the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs have ceased to exist, that they have nothing else to do, because the conflict no longer exists, there is no region called Nagorno Karabakh, the international community continues to see the settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict within the framework of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairs’ format, which is very encouraging," Mirzoyan said.

Earlier, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that "the United States and France are not ready to continue contacts with Russia because of the policy of Russophobia in the format of the OSCE Minsk Group", and that he does not know the future of the OSCE Minsk Group.




RFE/RL Armenian Report – 04/08/2022

                                        Friday, April 8, 2022


Court Overturns Pashinian’s Conviction In 2008 Unrest Case

        • Naira Bulghadarian

Armenia - A man walks past burned cars on a street in Yerevan where security 
forces clashed with opposition protesters, 2 March 2008.


Armenia’s Court of Cassation has absolved Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian from 
all responsibility for the 2008 post-election unrest in Yerevan that left ten 
people dead.

Pashinian played a major role in an opposition movement led by former President 
Levon Ter-Petrosian, the main opposition candidate in a hotly disputed 
presidential election.

The then 32-year-old journalist was the main speaker at an opposition rally held 
in Yerevan on March 1-2, 2008 amid vicious clashes between some protesters and 
security forces. Eight protesters and two police officers were killed in what 
was the worst street violence in Armenia’s history.

Outgoing President Robert Kocharian declared a state of emergency and ordered 
Armenian army units into the capital, accusing the Ter-Petrosian-led opposition 
of attempting to seize power.

Pashinian went into hiding but surrendered to law-enforcement authorities in 
July 2009. He was subsequently tried and sentenced to seven years in prison for 
organizing the “mass disturbances,” a charge rejected by him as politically 
motivated.

Like other Ter-Petrosian allies, Pashinian was released from jail in May 2011 
under a general amnesty declared by the former Armenian authorities.

In February this year, Armenia’s Office of the Prosecutor-General appealed to 
the Court of Cassation to overturn the guilty verdict in Pashinian’s trial and 
declare him innocent. It cited a ruling handed down by the European Court of 
Human Rights (ECHR) in January.

The Strasbourg court ruled that Armenian law-enforcement authorities had 
violated Pashinian’s freedom of speech and assembly.

The Court of Cassation, the country’s highest body of criminal justice, cleared 
Pashinian of any wrongdoing in a verdict handed down on Friday. It also 
acquitted three other former opposition activists.

Armenia - Opposition leader Nikol Pashinian addresses protesters that barricaded 
themselves in central Yerevan, 1 March 2008.

A spokesman for the prosecutors insisted in February that their decision to seek 
Pashinian’s acquittal “has nothing to do with the position occupied” by 
Pashinian at present. One of the prosecutors said on Friday that a total of 20 
individuals jailed for the 2008 unrest have had their convictions overturned in 
the last three years.

The authorities radically changed the official version of the events of March 
2008 shortly after Pashinian swept to power in May 2018. They prosecuted 
Kocharian and three other former officials on coup charges strongly denied by 
them.

A district court in Yerevan acquitted Kocharian and the other defendants in 
April 2021 after the Constitutional Court declared the coup charges 
unconstitutional.

The 67-year-old ex-president, who now leads the country’s main opposition 
alliance, has said that his prosecution is part of a “political vendetta” waged 
by Pashinian. The prime minister has denied that.



Russia Slams West’s ‘Disingenuous’ Moves On Karabakh

        • Aza Babayan

Russia - Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Armenian Foreign Minister 
Ararat Mirzoyan enter a hall during a meeting in Moscow, April 8, 2022.

Russia on Friday accused Western powers of seeking to sideline it, hijack 
Armenian-Azerbaijani peace talks and use the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in their 
standoff with Moscow over Ukraine.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that the United States and France 
have stopped working with Russia within the framework of the OSCE Minsk Group 
that has long been co-headed by the three mediating nations.

Lavrov also hit out at the European Union, saying that it is trying to claim 
credit for Armenian-Azerbaijani agreements that were brokered by Moscow after 
the 2020 war in Nagorno-Karabakh.

“In a Russophobic frenzy, our American and French ‘partners’ … have cancelled 
the co-chairing troika of the OSCE Minsk Group,” he said after talks with 
Armenia’s visiting Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan. “They have said that they 
will not be communicating with us in this format.”

“If they are ready to sacrifice the interests -- in this case of the Armenian 
side -- of settlement in Nagorno-Karabakh and the South Caucasus as a whole, 
it’s their choice,” he told a joint news conference.

Mirzoyan questioned this claim, saying Yerevan has received “very clear signals” 
from the U.S. and France that they remain committed to the Minsk Group. “This is 
very encouraging,” he said.

Lavrov went on to lambaste European Council President Charles Michel for his 
failure to mention Russia’s role in his statement on his trilateral meeting with 
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev 
held in Brussels on Wednesday.

“This indicates what is more important for the EU leadership: to build on what 
has been achieved or to use the Karabakh theme to ‘mark’ itself along its 
Russophobic line,” he said. “This is sad. Russia will never sacrifice the 
interests of our closest allies to some geopolitical, propaganda plans or games.”

Michel said after the Brussels talks that Aliyev and Pashinian agreed to start 
drafting a comprehensive peace accord and to set up a commission tasked with 
demarcating the Armenian-Azerbaijani border. He also reaffirmed the EU’s 
readiness to facilitate the opening of transport links and other 
confidence-building measures between the two South Caucasus states.

Russia - Russian President Vladimir Putin, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev 
and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian make statements to the press after 
talks in Sochi, November 26, 2021.

Lavrov stressed that Russian President Vladimir Putin had already laid the 
groundwork for these agreements during his frequent contacts with the Armenian 
and Azerbaijani leaders. In particular, he argued that the latter pledged to 
create a commission on border demarcation at their November 2021 meeting with 
Putin held in Sochi.

“We and our colleagues confirmed today that the decision of the leaders of 
Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan that the delimitation commission will be 
bilateral with the consultative participation of the Russian side remains in 
force,” added Lavrov.

A senior EU diplomat insisted earlier on Friday that the EU and Russian efforts 
to end the Karabakh conflict are “not mutually incompatible.”The diplomat also 
told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service that Michel gave credit to Moscow by referring to 
the Russian-brokered ceasefire that stopped the six-week war in November 2020.

Lavrov further announced that a Russian-Armenian-Azerbaijani intergovernmental 
body dealing with practical modalities of reopening regional transport links 
will meet later this month after a four-month hiatus. He said Moscow is also 
ready to help Yerevan and Baku “create conditions” for concluding the peace 
treaty.

“We talked [with Mirzoyan] in detail about how we can help our neighbors start 
this process,” he said.

In a further sign that Moscow wants to wrest back the initiative in the 
Armenian-Azerbaijani peace process, Lavrov phoned his Azerbaijani counterpart 
Jeyhun Bayramov after the talks with Mirzoyan. According to the Russian Foreign 
Ministry, they discussed the possible peace treaty, the creation of the 
commission on border demarcation and renewed activities of the 
Russian-Armenian-Azerbaijani task force.



Russia Again Not Backed By Armenia In UN Vote On Ukraine

        • Naira Nalbandian

U.S. - Ukraine's UN Ambassador Sergiy Kyslytsya speaks during a UN General 
Assembly vote on a draft resolution seeking to suspend Russia from the UN Human 
Rights Council in New York City on April 7, 2022.


Armenia has declined to vote against suspending Russia from the United Nations 
Human Rights Council over its ongoing military campaign in Ukraine.

The UN General Assembly cited reports of “gross and systematic violations and 
abuses of human rights” in Ukraine on Thursday when it made the decision by 93 
votes to 24, with 58 abstentions. Armenia and more than a dozen other nations 
did not vote at all.

Armenia was the only member of the Russian-led Collective Security Treaty 
Organization (CSTO) that did not openly oppose the decision.

Russia's deputy UN Ambassador Gennady Kuzmin described the General Assembly’s 
move as an "illegitimate and politically motivated step" before announcing that 
Russia has decided to quit the Human Rights Council altogether.

According to the Reuters news agency, Russia had warned countries that a yes 
vote or abstention will be viewed as an “unfriendly gesture” with consequences 
for bilateral ties.

The Armenian government on Friday refrained from commenting on its ambiguous 
position on the suspension of Russia’s membership in the UN body.

By contrast, opposition lawmakers criticized Yerevan’s failure to side with 
Moscow. One of them, Aram Vartevanian, argued that Russia is Armenia’s closest 
ally and the main guarantor of Nagorno-Karabakh’s security.

“As you know, we have reached a point where it is the Russian peacekeepers in 
Artsakh (Karabakh) that guarantee the security of Artsakh Armenians,” said 
Vartevanian. “So I don’t understand the reasons for Armenia’s behavior.”

Last month Armenia abstained from voting on a UN General Assembly resolution 
that deplored “in the strongest terms” Russia's invasion of Ukraine. A few days 
earlier, it voted against the effective suspension of Russia’s membership in the 
Council of Europe.

Russia has long been Armenia’s main military and political ally. The South 
Caucasus state’s dependence on Moscow for defense and security deepened further 
following the 2020 war with Azerbaijan.



EU Plans More Armenian-Azeri Talks

        • Heghine Buniatian

Belgium - European Council President Charles Michel, Armenian Prime Minister 
Nikol Pashinian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Ali start a trilateral meeting 
in Brussels, April 6, 2022.


The European Union plans to organize more negotiations between Armenia and 
Azerbaijan to follow up on understandings reached by their leaders in Brussels 
on Wednesday, according to a senior EU diplomat.

“What will actually happen very practically is that we're going to be having 
very regular meetings and a continued role of facilitation for the EU,” the 
diplomat privy to the talks told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service.

During their trilateral meeting with European Council President Charles Michel, 
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev 
decided to instruct their foreign ministers to start official negotiations on an 
Armenian-Azerbaijani peace treaty.

They also agreed to set up before the end of this month a joint commission on 
demarcating the Armenian-Azerbaijani border.

“I'm fully conscious when I say that there's not much time left,” said the 
diplomat. “I think we will need to be following up quite quickly with this. And 
I think there is an expectation that we would look to have a meeting at leaders’ 
level relatively soon to review progress and tackle any outstanding issues that 
are blocking the moves forward.”

The source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, gave no possible dates for 
the next Aliyev-Pashinian encounter.

Michel described the four-hour talks hosted by him as “productive,” saying that 
they yielded “concrete and tangible results.”

Critics in Armenia point out that the top EU official made no mention of 
Nagorno-Karabakh, let alone an agreement on its status or the Karabakh 
Armenians’ right to self-determination. They say this is a further sign that 
Pashinian is ready to agree to Azerbaijani control over the disputed territory.

Pashinian reiterated on Thursday that Baku’s proposals on the treaty, including 
a mutual recognition of each other’s territorial integrity, are acceptable to 
Yerevan. But he said the question of Karabakh’s status must also be on the 
agenda of the talks on the peace treaty.

The European diplomat suggested that this will likely be the case, pointing to 
Michel’s remark that the planned treaty “would address all necessary issues.”

“I think you can see that the phrase … ‘would address all necessary issues’ in 
the statement [by Michel] is not there by accident,” the diplomat stressed.

Pashinian has also been criticized by his domestic political opponents for 
agreeing to start the process of border demarcation without securing the 
withdrawal of Azerbaijani forces from Armenian border areas seized by them last 
year.

The Armenian government said earlier this year that the process should start 
only after a mutual withdrawal of troops from contested border areas.

“I think there's a recognition that you need a pullback on both sides of the 
border,” the EU diplomat said in this regard, adding that the demarcation 
commission is expected to also deal with “those contested areas where tension 
reduction is a priority.”

The diplomat also insisted that the EU’s growing involvement in 
Armenian-Azerbaijani negotiations is not aimed at undermining Russia’s 
significant role and presence in the Karabakh conflict zone. The official 
pointed to the Kremlin’s positive reaction to the outcome of the Brussels talks.

The diplomat said Turkey, another major regional player, is even more supportive 
of the EU mediation: “This process that we're running is very helpful for them 
because the Turks are not able or cannot have a process of normalization with 
Armenia without that being matched by a process, if you like, of normalization 
between Azerbaijan and Armenia. So there they are, in my view, mutually 
reinforcing.”


Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2022 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 

Pashinyan, Michel and Aliyev discussed possibility of cooperation on finding out fates of missing persons

Save

Share

 15:39, 7 April, 2022

YEREVAN, APRIL 7, ARMENPRESS. During the meeting between Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, President of the European Council Charles Michel and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev in Brussels on April 6, the possibility of cooperation on finding out the fates of missing persons was also discussed, the Armenian PM said at the Cabinet meeting today.

“The humanitarian issues were among the key topics of the discussion. The European Council President emphasized the necessity of releasing all captured persons. We also discussed the possibility and issues of cooperating around finding out the fate of the missing persons”, the PM said.

He reminded that after the two Artsakh wars the Armenian side has 985 missing persons, 208 of whom have been declared missing after the 44-day war, and 777 after the First Artsakh War. Pashinyan emphasized that it is necessary to continue the work on finding out their fate.

Misinterpretations recorded over opening of connections – PM

Save

Share

 16:03, 7 April, 2022

YEREVAN, APRIL 7, ARMENPRESS. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said that during his meeting with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and European Council President Charles Michel in Brussels they recorded misinterpretations regarding the issue of opening of connections in the region and they agreed to continue the work.

Speaking at the Cabinet meeting, Pashinyan said that the opening of regional communications was a topic of discussion, among others, at the meeting.

“We recorded some misinterpretations around this and we agreed to continue working to find solutions,” the PM said.

“Crucial efforts and progress made between Armenia and Azerbaijan” – High Representative Josep Borrell

Save

Share

 17:22, 7 April, 2022

YEREVAN, APRIL 7, ARMENPRESS. Crucial efforts and progress were made between Armenia and Azerbaijan to work towards lasting peace and a stable and secure South Caucasus, High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice-President of the EU Commission Josep Borrell said in a tweet referring to the EU-mediated meeting between Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev.

“Crucial efforts and progress made between Armenia and Azerbaijan to work towards lasting peace and a stable and secure South Caucasus. In the current geopolitical context it is more important than ever to find ways to engage and to diplomatically solve conflicts,” Borrell said, sharing European Council President Charles Michel’s tweet.

Michel had tweeted that the meeting was productive and that concrete and tangible results were recorded.

Armenia showcases SU-30SM jets to EU, NATO defense attachés

PanARMENIAN
Armenia – April 1 2022

PanARMENIAN.Net - The defense attachés of the EU and NATO member states accredited in Armenia on Thursday, March 31 visited one of the country's airbases to make sure that all 4 of Armenia's SU-30SM aircraft were in the home base.

Yerevan earlier denied reports from Turkey claiming that the Armenia has transferred four Su-30 jet to Russia for use in hostilities against Ukraine.

The commander of the airbase, Air Force Colonel Samvel Tavadyan presented the daily activities of the military unit to the foreign guests and answered the questions they were interested in," the Defense Ministry said in a statement.

"Afterwards, the defense attachés visited the facilities in the military unit and had been introduced to the aviation equipment," the statement said.

"The visiting personnel was most interested in SU 30-SM aircrafts. Expressing gratitude for the acceptance, the defense attachés noted that during the visit they were once again convinced that all 4 SU-30SM aircrafts were in the home base, and the information spread in the Azerbaijani and Turkish press, that the aircrafts were taking part in the hostilities in Ukraine, did not correspond to reality.