Turkish diplomat elected 75th UN General Assembly president

Panorama, Armenia
Politics 12:19 18/06/2020World

Turkish diplomat Volkan Bozkir was elected President of the forthcoming session of the UN General Assembly in a vote held on Wednesday, the UN website reported.

Bozkir will preside over the 75th UN General Assembly, which opens in September. World leaders will not be coming to New York for the annual gathering for the first time in the 75-year history of the United Nations because of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the session to be held online.

The UN General Assembly presidency rotates annually between the five geographic groups. In 2020-2021, the president was to be elected from the Western European and Others Group, which also includes Turkey. Bozkir was the sole candidate for the post.

His candidacy was initially sent to member states for unanimous approval by silence procedure, but several countries, including Armenia, Greece, Cyprus and the UAE, objected it, requesting a secret vote. 

Russian ambassador to Armenia meets with Prosperous Armenia MPs

Panorama, Armenia

Russian Ambassador to Armenia Sergey Kopirkin met on Wednesday with Deputy Speaker of the Armenian National Assembly Vahe Enfiajyan and Chairman of the parliament’s Standing Committee on Regional and Eurasian Integration Mikayel Melkumyan, who represent the opposition Prosperous Armenia faction.

"During the talks, the parties discussed the development of Russian-Armenian inter-parliamentary relations, Russia's support in the fight against the coronavirus infection, which was provided to Armenia both in bilateral format and within the framework of general integration associations,” the Russian Embassy in Armenia said in a statement.

The parliamentarians also shared their views on some aspects of Armenia’s domestic political agenda, the statement said. 

Canada Stops Military Exports to Azerbaijan and Bans Arms Sales to Turkey

Armenian
National Committee of Canada

Comité
national arménien du Canada

 

Tel./Tél. (613) 235-2622

E-mail/Courriel:[email protected]

www.anccanada.org

 

-PRESS RELEASE-

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

June 4, 2020                                                                         

Contact: Sevag Belian (613) 235-2622

 

Canada Stops Military Exports to
Azerbaijan and
Bans Arms Sales to Turkey

 

(OTTAWA) – On May 29th, 2020, Global Affairs Canada (GAC) published
its annual report on Canada’s Military Exports, where it had mentioned that no
military export permits were issued to Azerbaijan during 2019, reported the
Armenian National Committee of Canada (ANCC). 

Since the sale
of armoured vehicles from private Canadian companies to the Republic of
Azerbaijan in 2017, this is the second year in a row that Canada has not
included Azerbaijan in the list of countries with whom it trades military
goods. Following Turkey’s “Operation Peace Spring” in Syria in October 2019,
Canada also banned military exports to Ankara, which was renewed indefinitely
in April 2020.

Following the
publication of the report, on June 4th, 2020, the ANCC sent a letter
to Canada’s Foreign Affair’s Minister, the Hon. Francois-Philippe Champagne,
commending the government’s decision and urging the minister to continue
refraining from engaging in arms trade with both Turkey and Azerbaijan.

In the letter,
ANCC Co-Presidents, Hrag Tarakdjian and Shahen Mirakian said “Turkey and
Azerbaijan pose a significant military threat within their immediate region and
beyond. While Turkey continues to destabilize the Middle East and threaten the
very existence of local minorities, Azerbaijan has significantly increased its
military preparedness, constantly signalling a renewal of hostilities in the
Republic of Artsakh, while threatening to attack the Republic of Armenia
directly.”

ANCC’s
co-presidents also shared their hope that based on Canada’s arm’s export
regulations and Ottawa’s accession to the Arms Trade Treaty, military export
permits bound for Turkey and Azerbaijan will become subject to a more rigorous
assessment process.

“Canada
simply cannot become complicit in the unspeakable war crimes and human rights
abuses sanctioned and carried out by regressive dictatorships such as Turkey
and Azerbaijan.”
, mentioned the letter.

“We will
continue to monitor the trade of military goods between Canada, Turkey and
Azerbaijan and ensure that our government always does the right thing.”
Concluded Tarakdjian and Mirakian.

 

-30-

******

The ANCC is the largest and
the most influential Armenian-Canadian grassroots human rights organization.
Working in coordination with a network of offices, chapters, and supporters
throughout Canada and affiliated organizations around the world, the ANCC
actively advances the concerns of the Armenian-Canadian community on a broad
range of issues and works to eliminate abuses of human rights throughout Canada
and the world.

Sevag Belian – Executive Director | Directeur exécutif
Armenian National Committee of Canada
Comité national arménien du Canada
T: (613) 235-2622 | C: (905) 329-8526
W: www.anccanada.org 
Facebook / Twitter / Instagram /


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ANCC Armenian Media" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].

Asbarez: Mkhitaryan, Roma Team ‘Take a Knee’ in Support of Black Lives Matter

June 3, 2020

Henrikh Mkhitaryan joined his Roma teammates in taking the knee in support of Black Lives Matter

Armenian National Soccer team captain and Roma midfielder Henrikh Mkhitaryan joined his coach Paulo Fonseca and his fellow teammates on Tuesday in taking a knee—kneeling—in a show of support for the Black Lives Matter movement.

“We are together and today we kneel in support of Black Lives Matter,” Mkhitaryan said in a Twitter post.

Roma joined a number of other European soccer clubs, whose players took the knee in a message of solidarity following the brutal death African-American George Floyd in Minneapolis.

Protests have been held after Floyd, an unarmed black man, died on May 25 after being restrained by white Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, who kneeled on his neck for almost nine minutes to pin him down, causing his death.

A view from Jerusalem: Azerbaijan occupies the homes of 360 thousand Armenian refugees, and Armenia – 250 thousand Azerbaijani

Arminfo, Armenia
June 2 2020

ArmInfo. It can be safely said that without taking into account the refugee aspect, all attempts to resolve the Karabakh conflict seem to be incomplete. If we are  talking about occupation, then today, according to the UN, Azerbaijan  is occupying the homes of 360 thousand Armenian refugees, and Armenia  – 250 thousand of Azerbaijani ones. An Israeli public figure,  publicist Avigdor Eskin, expressed a similar opinion to ArmInfo.

<Thus, during the conflict of the late eighties and early nineties,  hundreds of thousands of people lost their homes and shelters. This  situation is completely different from the one when one side holds  the territory of the other. All negotiations come down to the  boundaries of retreat. While consideration of the topic of refugees  reveals completely different ratios, suggesting a rather different  balance. And why are humanitarian problems due to war less weighty  than territorial ones? They give a new picture of the relationship  between deprivation and suffering>, he stressed.

Eskin recalled that the negotiation process between Armenia and  Azerbaijan after the war lasts more than a quarter century.  Negotiations, however, did not bring peace to the peoples of the  region. The main discussion framework is the schedule and measure of  the retreat of the Armenian army from its current positions in favor  of establishing Azerbaijan's sovereignty there. At a certain stage,  Yerevan agreed to give the adjacent five regions, leaving itself  strategically the most important two regions and Artsakh itself.   However, a compromise has not been reached to this day.

According to Eskin, international conflict resolution documents are  usually based on UN Security Council resolutions. Particularly often  a reference is made to the resolution 822 of November 12, 1993. The  formulations approved in this document are often used by Baku to  manifest its own position. Meanwhile, any simple analysis of  negotiation documents of all past years between Azerbaijan and  Armenia, demonstrates that the lion's share of the time was devoted  to discussing territorial disputes and security issues. At the same  time, in his opinion, the answer is still hanging in the air to the  question of whether it is possible to resolve the conflict fairly if,  in addition to territorial and military aspects, it has also  humanitarian one.

''The continued retention with the help of the Armenian army of the  territories that were part of Soviet Azerbaijan before the war, is  called occupation by Baku, and has become a common topic of  discussion.  However, is a territorial dispute the only and main  topic? Is the fate of disadvantaged and tragically homeless people  not a significant topic?>, Eskin wondered.

<Usually the matter concerns the rights and needs of Baku. Moreover,  limiting everything only to the issue of territory and security, the  current stalemate in the negotiations may become a chronic one. But  if you look at the problem more broadly and take into account the  factor of human suffering as a result of the war, a place opens up  for creative diplomatic efforts. A just resolution of the conflict  frozen a quarter century ago cannot be reduced to the formalism of  the borders of the Soviet period. The settlement should begin by  taking into account the human factor, which we tend to forget about,  "concluded Eskin. 

Armenia PM deletes comment and live broadcast at a family party from his Facebook page

News.am, Armenia
June 2 2020
(PHOTOS) (PHOTOS)

23:18, 02.06.2020
                  

Review & Outlook – 05/26/2020

The Coming Regional Conflict and the Strategic Importance of Nakhijevan


Armenian News Network / Armenian News

Review & Outlook

By Grigor Hakobyan


Summary
In a time of pandemic where all warring countries and entities were asked to stop various conflicts to focus on containing the spread of COVID-19 virus around the world, Azerbaijan decided to conduct large scale military exercises on Armenian-Azerbaijani front lines along the borders of Artsakh and Republic of Armenia between May 18-24 without advance warning as required by international norms and conventions. While major military exercises were taking places at a distance of 800m-1km from the Armenian-Azerbaijani frontlines, a group of Azerbaijani special forces attempted to penetrate Armenian defense lines in the south of Artsakh. Unable to make any progress the Azerbaijani commando team was forced to retreat to its original position while sustaining casualties inflicted during clashes with the Armenian defense forces in the area. In the meantime, the geography of the Azerbaijani military exercises with live fire included the Nakhijevani exclave also.

The present-day Nakhijevan exclave resembles more of a springboard for Azerbaijani-Turkish invasion of Armenia rather than a region of calm and peace. The amount of firepower concentrated in Nakhijevan, less than 50km away from Yerevan is enough to constitute a direct threat to the security of the Republic of Armenia and its capitol. Furthermore, the present ruling elite in Armenia just like its predecessors relies on a false assumption that somehow the presence of Russian forces in Armenia will deter Azerbaijani-Turkish aggression from its south-western direction. If Syrian war is any guide, the presence of Russian military contingent in Syria didn’t deter Turkey from invading Syria and occupying various parts of the country. Similarly, membership of Greece in NATO and EU didn’t prevent Turkish forces from occupying Greek territory on the east bank of the river Evros, near the town of Feres.
If history is any guide Armenia cannot fully rely on foreign countries and foreign armies to defend itself against existential threats coming from Turkey. It needs to actively prepare itself to be able to hold off and destroy invading Turkish troops before they cross the Arax river on its own. At this point what needs to be asked is whether present day Armenia is ready for another Battle of Sardarabad? Is Armenia ready to liberate Nakhijevan and to move its battles to the territory of “Western Armenia”? Is Armenia ready to defend and rescue Armenian communities in the Middle East from the Turkish onslaught? Is Armenia ready to fight on its own and ensure a favorable solution to the Armenian Cause? Is the Armenian diaspora ready to rally in defense of Armenia when all hell breaks loose? If not, then what can be done to get ready?
Background
Nakhijevan itself is a territory of about 5,000 sq. km. with a population of over 400,000 people. It presently hosts about 20,000 Azerbaijani troops which constitute its ground forces, air forces, air defense forces, rocket-artillery units and special forces. They are further reinforced with Turkish military advisors and Israeli and Turkish made weapon systems such as LORA short range ballistic missiles with a range of 300km-400km and 300mm RTG-300 Turkish MLRS which have a range of 90km-120km, Belorussian POLONEZ ballistic missile systems with a range of 300km, Israeli and Turkish made combat drones and other aircrafts. The economy is primarily based on agriculture, trade and tourism.
The recent Azerbaijani military exercises involved 10,000 troops, 30 combat aircrafts, 200 MLRS and other units of artillery, a few hundred tanks and armored personnel carriers such as T-72, T-90 and BMP-82A. The military exercises were offensive in nature as they simulated the format of the Azerbaijani attack during the Four Day War in April 2016 when Azerbaijani armed forces utilized large number of special forces, Turkish military advisers and ISIS/Al Qaida related fighters from Syria in their attempt to take over frontline Armenian positions in the north and south of Artsakh with the intent of diverting the Armenian forces along its northern and southern directions, while preparing an opening for the main invasion force made up of armored column and hundreds of infantrymen concentrated near Akna to break Armenian defenses in the Askeran region and take over Stepanakert.
The distance between the closest Azerbaijani military positions in Nakhijevan and Armenia’s capitol, Yerevan, is less than 50km. For example, one of the Armenian border towns called Yerashxavan is less than an hour drive from the center of Yerevan. As such, the accumulated firepower in Nakhijevan in such a close geographic proximity to Yerevan presents itself a clear and present danger to the capitol and other cities surrounding Yerevan along with a number of towns and villages that are located next to the Armenia-Nakhijevan border such as Ararat, Yegheghnadzor, Vayk, Areni, Zangagatun and others.
What needs to be noted further, based on this and previous military exercises in Nakhijevan, is that the next attack against the Republics of Armenia and Artsakh will involve the Nakhijevani direction also. This time the attack is planned to occur from at least five directions: north and south of the Republic of Armenia in addition to north-east, east and south-east directions of the Republic of Artsakh. The sixth potential direction of attack may come from the west of the Republic of Armenia, Turkey. Interestingly these events have taken place at a time when oil and gas prices are at their lowest, when social upheaval is taking shape in Azerbaijan due to economic downturn, amidst corruption scandals in the government and in the middle of the ongoing reshuffling of the government to transfer power from Ilham Aliyev to his wife, Mehriban Aliyev.
Analysis
The military exercises have taken place on a background of complicated regional rivalry unfolding between Russia and Turkey and the ongoing conflict between Russian-led and Turkish-led forces in Syria and Libya where pro-Russian forces have suffered major setbacks, inability to defeat political opposition in the province of Idlib and failure of Haftar-led forces to take over Tripoli before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. As mentioned previously, the amount of firepower accumulated in Nakhijevan presents a clear and present danger to the Republic of Armenia. Specifically, Armenian provinces of Syunik, Vayots Dzor, Ararat and Gegharkunik can easily be targeted by Azerbaijani rocket-artillery forces and air force.
The present situation in the region is further complicated due to aggressive Turkish diplomacy that threatens to start another war with Russia and to destabilize the region of Northern Caucasus in case of direct clashes with Russian forces in Syria. Considering that about more than a quarter of the population in Russia is Sunni Muslim and that there have been a number of civil wars in the Northern Caucasus already in the early and mid-1990s, the threats made by Turkish officials cannot be easily ignored.
On the other hand, effective neutralization of Azerbaijani military threats in Nakhijevan will allow Armenia to reduce its border with Azerbaijan by about 250 km and expand its geographic territory by 5, 000 sq. km. which will increase the security of the abovementioned Armenian provinces and enhance the overall geopolitical security of the Republic of Armenia in the long term. Furthermore, it will allow to reposition significant number of Armenian troops on the border with Azerbaijan from the south-west to the north and north-east of the country while leaving the border troops to guard Armenia-Iran and Armenia-Turkey border in Nakhijevan. Additionally, a few hundred thousand of people and thousands of small and medium size businesses will be added to Armenia’s population that will contribute to the growth of Armenia’s economy.
Careful analysis of current geopolitical rivalries between above-mentioned forces and historical events that preceded these conflicts from the beginning of the twentieth century, right at the end of WW-1 leads one to conclude that the Azerbaijani-Turkish alliance is preparing for a military revanche in the region that is meant to reshuffle status quo in the Greater Middle East and to further undermine Russian influence outside of Russian Federation and European Influence in northern Africa and the Mediterranean. The major question that is yet to be answered is “when” to expect for such events to unfold. Considering present realities on the ground and tense competition between Russia and Turkey in the region, it will be reasonable to expect for such developments to take place within the next few years as soon as the international political climate in the region and the world at large creates an opening for such nefarious plans to be realized.
The geography of the coming regional conflict will not be limited to the territories of Russia, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Iran, Syria, Turkey and Libya and may extend to the E.U., Greece and Cyprus specifically, which have their own conflicting claims with Turkey over large natural gas deposits and a number of islands found in the Aegean Sea and Mediterranean Sea. De-facto annexations of Greek and Syrian territories by Turkish forces are solid examples of aggressive Turkish foreign policy in the region. Moreover, the political tensions between Turkey and EU are further complicated by frequent influxes of tens of thousands of foreign migrants and refuges coming to Europe from Turkey. In fact, Turkey manipulates the flow of migrants to Europe as a way to extort billions of euros from the European Union.
Instead of effectively countering Turkish pressures the European Union is trying to appease Turkey for lack of other effective strategies at hand. Giving billions of euros in economic aid to Turkey doesn’t resolve the issue of foreign migrants flooding Europe. It only postpones the inevitable, the coming collapse of the European civilization within the next ten-to-twenty years. Similarly, Europe tried to appease Hitler before WW-2 to its own detriment. In the end it was utterly destroyed during WW-2. If it wasn’t for the American Marshal Plan at the end of the WW-2 the European Continent would have resembled present day third world countries in South America. However, this time around there may not be another Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe.
On the background of waning American influence in the region and aggressive Turkish expansionism in the Mediterranean region and the Middle East, the post COVID-19 world resembles a calm before a big storm. Just like the geopolitical situation before WW-1, any number of issues left unaddressed may quickly evolve and become a trigger for a regional conflagration, among them the resumption of Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict and the Russian-Turkish conflict in the Middle East. The situation is further complicated with growing tensions between the United States and China in the Pacific Ocean and unresolved Russian-Japanese dispute over Kuril Islands, expansion of Chinese military bases into the African continent and appearance of Turkish military bases in Libya and Qatar. The present world order is unstable and risks falling apart. The system of checks and balances that was created during the Cold War is no longer there. The post-Cold War system that was based on American military and economic dominance is also not there. In the meantime, the post COVID-19 global system of checks and balances hasn’t been created yet.
Conclusion
Considering slow phase of judicial reforms and constitutional changes in Armenia and internal divisions caused by the struggle between the former ruling regime and the present authorities in Yerevan, Armenia doesn’t appear to be ready for the coming conflict. While dark clouds are quickly gathering on the horizon, the internal political life in the country appears to be revolving around local issues. In the meantime, the Armenian military is preparing for a local conflict with Azerbaijan rather than preparing for a regional war that will involve Turkey and other non-state actors with conflicting interests.
Careful observation of the present geopolitical situation leads one to conclude that at this point nobody is preventing Turkey from occupying and annexing territories of its neighboring countries, as such there is no guarantee that anyone will prevent Turkey from crossing the Arax river and attacking the Republic of Armenia during a resumption of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict. How different would things have been if every Armenian had a weapon and knew how to fight to defend themselves and their families during 1988-1994 war? Mistakes of the past cannot be repeated again yet they are being repeated by present and former governments of Armenia. The culture of military readiness is not fully developed and inhabitants of border towns and villages are not being armed and trained.
The Armenian defense doctrine is based on a false assumption that the first line of defense will not be broken and therefore it is not necessary to arm inhabitants of border towns and villages. Yet as the Four Day War has shown, the first line of defense around villages of Talish and Madagis was broken and civilian villagers were killed in the process of Azerbaijani breakthrough. Similarly, war crimes committed by the Azerbaijani forces against the Armenian civilians and captive soldiers both dead and alive during the Four Day War were not condemned by international community through imposition of any type of political or economic sanctions against Azerbaijan. As such, how can one expect them to do anything significant to deter Turkey from invading Armenia in case of resumption of Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict?
Based on present political climate in Armenia, slow phase of reforms and constitutional changes, and limited military capabilities of Armenian armed forces, it is very hard to sustain an argument that its military is ready to face the Turkish army on its borders. While Armenia is busy with constructing skyscrapers and shopping malls in Yerevan, not much attention is given to constructing bomb shelters in the city and other towns and villages along its borders. Furthermore, no nation-wide civil defense drills have been conducted for more than thirty years while very few if any civilians know where the closest bomb shelter is located. Moreover, if there are any bomb shelters around in most likelihood, they are not stocked up with any emergency food, water, blankets, medicine, emergency radios and electric generators.
Majority of people are not trained in delivering First Aid and CPR. Furthermore, not enough is done to train Armenia’s reserve forces. Thousands of men with prior military experience, now in their 50s and 60s are not in the right physical condition to run, crawl or do any other physical activity that will be required of them to save their own lives or those of others on the battlefield. Most of them have not shot from any weapon or done much running in a very long time. In the meantime, soldiers serving on the frontline do not possess any side arms except for the commanding officers and many of them have limited knowledge of other weapon systems to use them effectively in the battle besides the assault rifles that they have been trained with. Furthermore, the duration of military service is too short to cross train them all in effective use of sophisticated weapon systems such as MANPADS, mortars and anti-tank weapons in addition to small arms.
Recommendations
To correct the abovementioned shortcomings, there are many changes that need to be done. Among them Armenia should consider starting to dig modern bomb shelters near populous areas and frequently conduct civil defense drills not only in Yerevan but also in other cities, small towns and villages. Israeli experience is an example to follow. Every person should know where the closest bomb shelter is located. Additionally, the population must be trained in delivering First Aid and CPR. In fact, CPR and First Aid should be incorporated into the school curriculum for all schools throughout the country. Furthermore, self-defense and martial arts should be incorporated into school curriculum the same way it is done in a number of Asian countries. Chess is a good training for the mind while any form of martials arts is a good training for the body.
During next regional conflict the safety of Armenian communities in the Middle East will be in jeopardy. As the recent conflict in Syria have shown, the Republic of Armenia was not prepared to receive tens of thousands of Armenian refugees from Syria. As a result, great number of them had to leave to other countries while a small portion of them remained in Armenia. Problems with settling Armenian refugees were many, among them lack of permanent housing and financial support. In some cases, Syrian Armenians chose to return back to war-torn Syria instead of remaining in a peaceful Armenia as their expectations for attaining high standards of living were found to be unjustified. Very few if any government and/or private programs were present to assist Syrian refugees with the integration into the mainstream life of their fellow countrymen. Therefore such programs need to be created in anticipation of what may happen rather than trying to figure out at the last moment, post-factum.
Furthermore, military training of young recruits needs to be revamped to incorporate cross-training on various weapon systems which will allow any soldier to effectively use any type of machine guns, RPGs, mortars and MANPADS as good as their assault rifles. If necessary, the duration of mandatory military service should be extended by another six months or a year. Moreover, basic military training should also incorporate knife-fighting and knife-defense techniques in addition to open hand-to-hand combat. These types of trainings shouldn’t be limited to special forces and frontline troops only, as any member of any branch of the Armenian military may end up in a situation of close-quarter combat at any point during a battle.
Additionally, women who reach the age of 18 should undergo mandatory basic boot camp training just like their male counterparts and serve in the military similarly to how it is done in the Israeli military. Special women-only training battalions should be created to allow women to receive military training and complete their mandatory military service. The duration of their mandatory training could be shorter and the intensity of the training could be modified if needed. As such, the concept of Nation-Army shouldn’t be just a slogan. Armenia should aim towards becoming a nation-army through rigorous and frequent trainings of its population and through maintaining active reserve forces similar to those found in Israel, Singapore, Norway, Switzerland and even in the United States.
Moreover, command-control infrastructure should be decentralized throughout the country and different branches of government should be moved to different provinces. Having them all concentrated in Yerevan doesn’t make sense from a strategic point of view, especially when they are located less than 50km from Azerbaijani military positions in Nakhijevan. Similarly, large military barracks need to be downsized and spread out throughout the frontline. Having more than one hundred soldiers under one roof is an easy target for any modern projectile containing enough explosive power to blow up everything and everyone within one large building into pieces. Present day format of stationing military troops in large barracks was effective a few hundred years ago, but not now, when modern day rocket-artillery and air forces are capable of destroying stationary targets hundreds of kilometers away from their original bases.
To avoid detection, more tunnels need to be created to expedite the arrival of reinforcements to the frontline positions in time of war. Furthermore, most of the towed artillery should be repositioned unto moving platforms for better mobility and for increasing the chances of survival during a counter attack by enemy’s rocket-artillery forces. A greater emphasis must be placed on acquiring and developing supersonic missiles, maneuverable combat drones, fully automated weapons systems run by A.I. (artificial intelligence), and non-traditional weapons systems based on high energy physics. More can be done and more needs to be done because as of now, the population of Armenia is not ready to survive the resumption of large-scale hostilities on its borders and will not be able to fight effectively if called upon to do so. The next battle of Sardarabad should not happen on the territory of the present-day Republic of Armenia but rather needs to be fought on the other side of the Arax river.

Grigor Hakobyan is an independent political, defense and security analyst residing in Phoenix, AZ. He holds a Bachelors degree in Political Science from Arizona State University and has written for the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute of John Hopkins University. Mr Hakobyan has interned at the US House of Representatives where he researched ethnic conflicts and terrorism in Russia, Caucasus and Central Asia regions, and the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies at the International Center for Terrorism Studies where he researched terrorist networks operating in Russia, Central Asia and Caucasus Region. He writes political analysis articles for ANN/Armenian News.


***************************************************************************
    The Critical Corner
    The Literary Armenian News
    Review & Outlook
    Probing the Photographic Record
    Armenia House Museums
    …and much more
© Copyright 2020,  Armenian News Network / Armenian News, all rights reserved.
Regards,
Armenian News Network / Armenian News
Los Angeles, CA     / USA

Lawyer: Investigators spare no effort to make Armenia football federation former president and ex-MP’s son accused

News.am, Armenia
Lawyer: Investigators spare no effort to make Armenia football federation former president and ex-MP's son accused Lawyer: Investigators spare no effort to make Armenia football federation former president and ex-MP's son accused

13:25, 17.05.2020
                  

Football Federation of Armenia former president and ex-MP Ruben Hayrapetyan's lawyer Amram Makinyan has made a post on his Facebook page.

"The accused is the victim, the victim is the accused… This is how the judicial statuses are being changed [in Armenia] with the help of a magic wand…

Investigators investigating the ‘especially important cases’ of the Investigative Committee spare no effort for Rafik Hayrapetyan, the son of Ruben Hayrapetyan, who suffered from the crime, to become an accused, whereas the real accused to become a victim…

What is the issue… years ago, the director of the company belonging to Rafik Hayrapetyan, without his knowledge and permission, fraudulently received a loan of tens of millions in the name of the company, cashed the money and spent it for personal needs…

And now, the investigators dealing ‘especially those involved in important cases’ (…) are engaged in the realization of the well-known character’s especially important dreams: taking revenge on Ruben Hayrapetyan at any cost…,” the attorney wrote, in particular.  

CIVILNET.Why Should Mahatma Gandhi’s Statue Stand in Yerevan? An Indian View

CIVILNET.AM

14:22

By Murtza Ali Ghaznavi

As a businessman of Indian origin based in Tbilisi and active in both the republics of Georgia and Armenia, it is with cautious enthusiasm that I received the news of the potential installation of a statue of Mahatma Gandhi in the almost 3,000 year old capital city of Yerevan. The presence of which can be clearly inferred to be a visible manifestation of the warm ties between Armenia and India. 

Though Mr. Patrick Azadian raises some interesting objections and conversely, Mr. Nareg Seferian raises some interesting justifications of this action occurring in their homeland, there are also some thoughts that can be expressed from an outsider’s perspective; from the viewpoint of India this is a positive development indeed. Though Indian independence has other tragically unsung and forgotten heroes from Bhagat Singh to Subhas Chandra Bose, Gandhi Ji is very much considered the Father of Independent India and his presence in Yerevan shall no doubt come as a source of comfort and pride to the plethora of Indian students, tourists and indeed expatriates who call the South Caucasus home.

How the presence of this statue actually serves the people of Armenia is another matter entirely. Although Mahatma Gandhi was many things ranging from a lawyer to a proponent of non-violent, passive resistance, it is also important to look beyond the man and look at what he represents. Mahatma Gandhi is very much a symbol of India that is recognized worldwide for representing peace, equality and freedom. When understood in this greater context this statue may be seen as a fitting symbol of relations between both republics. India and Armenia enjoy friendly relations which have been swiftly growing in recent times. Both countries are recognized as being at the forefront of information technology and innovation. Both countries have a significant diaspora all over the world and whilst Armenia is rapidly becoming a bastion of democracy, India is the largest democracy in the world. Both countries have friendly relationships with some of their neighbours and tumultuous relationships with others. There is a budding Indian presence in Armenia as well as Armenians having been settled in India as far back as the 16th Century. The easily recognizable and fully functioning Armenian churches that still stand in Kolkata and Chennai today are vibrant testaments to this as is the evidence of Indian settlements in Greater Armenia as far back as 149 BC.

If expanded upon from an India- Armenia perspective to a Hindkastan- Hayastan perspective, the links between both countries are shown to be far more intricate. Though India has a plethora of languages and dialects, they all originate from the same Indo-Aryan roots as the Armenian language and its various barbarner. This is humorously exemplified by any speaker of a North Indian language being easily able to haggle at the Vernissage in Yerevan due to most of the numbers being the same.  Both cultures place strong emphasis on religion, family values, music, poetry and knowledge. Though India has a cornucopia of subcultures the fact remains that the Indian people are one proud and united nation, just as the Armenians are, and both are very old nations who existed in their lands long before numerous outsiders came whether to trade or invade. In fact India is a nation that has never invaded any other and instead always strived to prosper based on its own merit and resources. Surely these are values that the Armenian people can appreciate.

This mention of values can bring us to yet another perspective on Mahatma Gandhi; that of his values being universal. As fiercely proud as Indians are of this son of Gujarat who fathered the whole nation’s independence, the fact remains that all of humanity can take pride in the values he aspired to. There are many countries with statues of famous poets, scholars and intellectuals from all over the world and these personages have not been afforded this honour because of their nationality but rather their contributions to humanity. Many would argue that Mahatma Gandhi certainly qualifies under such criteria. As far as the controversy is concerned the fact remains that there are statues the world over that despite the sanctity of what they represent for some can also prove fertile grounds for iconoclasts. Accordingly it is important to remember that this is not just a statue of a man but rather a universal symbol of humanity that is instantly recognized throughout the world. “Mahatma” literally translates to “Great Soul.” Surely a great city would be an appropriate home for this statue.

Murtza Ali Ghaznavi is an International Higher Education Development Specialist with 12 years of experience in Europe, the Middle East and Post Soviet Republics. He is the Director of the Euroeducation language training centre, (Yerevan). 

Armenpress: Trump announces intent to nominate Patrick Hovakimian to key administration post

Trump announces intent to nominate Patrick Hovakimian to key administration post

Save

Share

 15:46, 7 May, 2020

YEREVAN, MAY 7, ARMENPRESS. US President Donald Trump on May 4 announced his intent to nominate Patrick Hovakimian, of California, to be General Counsel of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the White House said.

Hovakimian is currently the Associate Deputy Attorney General and Chief of Staff to Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey A. Rosen at the Department of Justice.  He also served as the Department’s Director of Counter-Transnational Organized Crime and as an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of California.  As a Federal prosecutor, Hovakimian prosecuted public corruption and white-collar crime, including multinational bribery and fraud conspiracies.

In addition, Hovakimian is a Commissioner of the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States, having been nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate in 2018.

Earlier in his career, Hovakimian practiced law with Latham & Watkins, LLP, and was a law clerk for the Honorable J.L. Edmondson of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.