Turkey Takes Swedish PM’s Statement As Apology

TURKEY TAKES SWEDISH PM’S STATEMENT AS APOLOGY

news.am
March 17 2010
Armenia

After the adoption of Armenian Genocide Resolution by Swedish
Parliament, Turkey recalled its Ambassador from Stockholm.

Swedish Premier John Reinfeldt’s statement was taken as apology in
Turkey and relations with Sweden are gradually improving, Turkish
Zaman daily reports. Turkish Ambassador to Sweden is likely to return
to Stockholm shortly, diplomatic sources informed Zaman.

Turkey awaits a similar message from the U.S. In the course of his
visit to UK, Turkish PM noted that his Swedish counterpart gave a
meaningful reply, that can be taken as apology.

In addition, Turkish Premier called OSCE Minsk Group to settle Karabakh
conflict, thus all problems in Armenia-Turkey and Armenia-Azerbaijan
relations will tackled.

As NEWS.am reported previously, Swedish PM Fredrik Reinfeldt Sweden
expressed his concern over the adoption of Armenian Genocide Resolution
by his Parliament. Sweden will not allow the resolution on recognition
of Armenian Genocide to have a negative impact on Turkey-Sweden
relations, Reinfeldt said.

Turkish Ambassador Speaks To Canberra Group

TURKISH AMBASSADOR SPEAKS TO CANBERRA GROUP

J-Wire Jewish Australian News Service
March 17 2010

Turkey’s ambassador to Australia Oguz Ozge has addressed the Capital
Jewish Forum.

More than thirty CJF members, from diverse professional backgrounds,
watched a tourism film on the sights and sounds of Turkey and then
heard Ambassador Ozge speak on the ‘Turkey-Israel relationship in
the Middle East and global context’ at the Turkish Embassy in Canberra.

The Embassy also generously offered CJF members local Turkish
delicacies, including Turkish delights, beer and coffee.

It gives me great pleasure to welcome members of the Capital Jewish
Forum. I am delighted to address such a distinguished audience. I
believe the discussions we are about to hold will contribute to a
better understanding of our respective views on matters of interest
to us.

I intend to make a short introductory statement and later shall be
ready to take your questions.

At the outset I wish to make a few remarks: The Turkish-Israeli
relations are based on a long-lasting friendship between the Turks
and Jews. Actually the relationship precedes the establishment of the
State of Israel. At present Turkey and Israel are natural partners in
the Middle East. They uphold the same universal values and ideals. Our
countries are in fact the only true liberal democracies in the region
with market economies in place. We in Turkey attach importance to
the security. We are aware that a comprehensive peace in the region
would be the best security guaranty for Israel.

The developments that take place in the Middle East usually have an
effect on our bilateral relationship. We may expect this correlation
to continue for as long as the problems in the Middle East persist
I am convinced that the periodic ups and downs that occur in the
Turkish-Israeli relations will in no way cause any harm to the essence
of our friendly ties, nor will alter the course of our deep-rooted
partnership in the region. The two nations have so far been able to
overcome those periodic difficulties. I can say therefore that the
ties between the two communities have stood the test of time well.

Over the centuries the Ottoman Empire, to which the Turkish Republic
is a successor state, served as a major place of refuge for people
suffering from persecution, Muslims and non-Muslims alike. Starting in
the fourteenth century , the Ottomans captured lands of the Byzantine
empire in Anatolia. Curiously, the Jewish minorities, who survived
centuries of Byzantine persecution, helped the Ottomans so that their
administration would offer the Jewish a better life and in particular
more freedom and tolerance. In later centuries the Ottoman Empire
received approximately 150 thousand Jewish refugees who were under the
threat of Christian attacks in western Europe. This includes above all,
those Jews who fled from persecution at the hands of the inquisition
in the Iberian Peninsula and Italy during the 15th century. In
the 16th and 17th centuries the Ottomans gave refuge to thousands
of Marranos. Actually they were Jews converted to Christianity in
Spain under the force of the Inquisition, but who had continued to
be subject to persecution because of suspicions that they had not in
fact abandoned their former religions. In the 17th and 18th centuries
the Ottomans provided refuge for many Jews who survived the Habsburg
invasion of Serbia and Bulgaria following the failure of the second
siege of Vienna in 1683 by the Ottomans. Lastly, I would like mention
that after the establishment of the Turkish Republic and particularly
during the 1930’s, the Turkish authorities took in hundreds of Jewish
refugees from Nazi persecution, including leading professors, teachers,
physicians, and artists and given senior positions. Most were appointed
to major professorships in Istanbul and Ankara Universities. Others
were given the opportunity to found and direct important scientific
institutes. In addition, during the same period a number of Turkish
diplomats helped a few thousand Jews, mostly former Turkish nationals,
in order to rescue them through consular intervention from persecution
in several European countries.

During the 19th century, jewish immigration to Palestine and
eventually to establish a Jewish homeland there was a topic on which
intense debate raged in Europe, particularly in the British and French
public. From the late 19th century, the Ottoman Empire adopted a policy
of allowing a reasonable amount of jewish immgration to Palestine
despite the opposition of its Arab subjects. Thus, from 1882 to1903
some 25.000, 1904 to 1914 roughly 30000 and 1919 to 1922 nearly 40000
jews, mainly from Russia and Poland were able to settle in Palestine.

The Turkish Parliament formally recognised the state of Israel on 28
March 1949, being the first muslim state to do so just after one year
ot Israel’s establishment. Since then bilateral relations between the
two countries have developed consistently, with interaction in the
political, economic, scientific and military fields having priority.

I would like to touch upon the so-called Genocide allegations against
Turkey as, the term of genocide may be of interest to you. The
Armenian diaspora alleges that in 1915, during World War I, 1.5
million Armenians living across the Ottoman lands were subjected to
genocidal treatment. The documents and photos that they pass around
as evidence are largely exagerated or manipulated. We have made
available to those of you who are interested, a copy of an article
by an Australian scholar Mr. Jeremy Salt, about a forged photo in
a book titled, published by Oxford University Press, a renowned
British publishing house.

We must remember the circumstances in which the Turkish army wages a
fierce war Armenian against the Russian army on its Eastern territories
and the Armenian bands armed with the Russia attacked the Turkısh
army on one hand and rose in rebellion on the other with a view to
establishing their own state on Turkish soil. In war conditions the
Imperial government saw no other choice but to move the Armenians
towards south coast of Turkey, away form the war theatre.

During the movement of Armenians to the southern region there happened
tragic events. But we are convinced that those tragic events never
amounted to genocide. There was no intention of killing Armenians
just for their being of Armenian origin. Clashes between Armenians and
Turks and other subjects of the Empire mainly for revenge, epidemics,
shortage of food caused casualties on both sides. We estimate the
Armenian causalties to be 200 to 600 thousand. On the basis of
British Empire and League of Nations figures, the total population
of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire at the beginning of World War I
was about 1.3 million. The Armenian claims that 1.5 million Armenians
were subjected to the so-called genocide are therefore baseless.

The Holocaust was formally recognised by a judgment of the Nuremberg
Tribunal. The members of the Armenian diaspora must realise that
they will also have to obtain a competent court’s judgment for their
alleged genocide to be recognised. Resolutions obtained through
parliaments largely on threat of witholding votes in constituences
where Armenaians carry some weight in the electorate, cannot be
sufficient. Yet the Armenians have so far refrained from to refer
thier claims to court. Because they know well that their position is
weak. The UN Convention of 1948 which deals with genocide does not
make any allowance for political groups that rose in rebellion or
resort to arms, against the central authority.

Some of the points raised by Ambassador Ozge in the ensuing Q&A
session include:

Turkey has good-neighbourly relations with Iran but is concerned with
its attempts to obtain nuclear weapons. Turkey may feel threatened if
Iran should have nuclear weapons, and believes Iran should abide by
all United Nations resolutions. However, Turkey does not object to Iran
operating a nuclear programme for peaceful purposes (i.e. energy use).

· While there is a religious movement at the political level
in Turkey, there has long been a robust secular base, which will
make it very difficult for any political force to change the status
quo. There are still issues to overcome but Turkey has been a beacon
of multiculturalism since the days of the Ottoman Empire. Dialogue
is important in the process of bridging the gap between the religious
and secular movements.

· Advocates of the secular movement greatly desire European
integration, predominantly because of perceived benefits in relation to
prosperity, intellectualism etc. But there are two important movements
which do not support this integration, namely the extreme religious
and nationalist movements. Their reluctance to integrate with Europe
must not be under-estimated. Similarly, the European Union’s demand of
Turkey to demonstrate a non-interventionist approach by the military
in the political affairs will not happen overnight – the military’s
influence in Turkish society is pervasive mainly due to the role it
played in the founding of the Turkish republic.

· Turkey is considered a model state for undemocratic Muslim
countries in the Middle East.

· There are no prejudices against Israelis or Jews in Turkey.

While anti-Semitism might occur in Turkey, much as it happens
throughout the world, it is not particularly visible in Turkey and
is not considered an issue. Turkish people accept members of other
faiths, cultures and ethnicities with acceptance and respect.

· Turkish citizens of Kurdish descent are protected by the
Constitution. They do not face any discrimination. In fact around one
fifth of Turkey’s parliamentarians are of Kurdish descent. While the
Kurdish community is predominantly located in the South East of Turkey,
they are well integrated with the rest of Turkish society in the main
cities throughout Turkey. There are indeed some Kurdish groups calling
for autonomy. While the Turkish Government is willing to consider a
range of requests from Kurdish groups, under no circumstances is it
willing to consider requests for autonomy or any other resolution
that would lead to an independent Kurdish state within Turkey.

· Turkey of course supports peace negotiations between Israel and
Syria and would be willing to act as mediator should the parties
request this.

CJF founder and director Manny Waks told J-Wire: " It should be
noted that the event ran an hour over time – a great indication of
the level of enjoyment by all those in attendance."

Watch the video at
-speaks-to-canberra-group/8010

http://www.jwire.com.au/news/turkish-ambassador

Turkish Film Festival To Be Held In Armenia

TURKISH FILM FESTIVAL TO BE HELD IN ARMENIA

Aysor
March 17 2010
Armenia

The II Yerevan Turkish Film 23.5 Festival will be held on March 25-27
in Armenia, being organized in assistance with the Caucasus Center of
Peace-Making Initiatives, British Embassy in Armenia, and Initiative of
‘Armenia-Azerbaijan-Turkey Step to Dialogue’.

This year’s festival provides a platform for 77 applicants from Ankara,
Istanbul, Adana, and other Turkish cities as well as from film-makers
of Turkish origin from other countries. However, festival’s director
George Vanian said that because of closed border and absence of a
postal connection between Armenia and Turkey, some applications and
films were not received and stayed beyond festival.

In the framework of the event, Awheel Screening will follow the
Festival in Armenia’s regions.

Aris Nalci, a representative of the Hrant Dink Foundation, will guest
on ceremony of opening of the Festival.

‘Swine Fever’ Epidemic Reduced To Zero In Armenia

‘SWINE FEVER’ EPIDEMIC REDUCED TO ZERO IN ARMENIA

Arminfo
2010-03-16 14:47:00

ArmInfo. ‘Swine fever’ epidemic has been reduced to zero in
Armenia, Armenian Health Minister Harutyun Kushkyan said at today’s
press-conference.

He also added that managed to reach such a result thanks to the
timely measures directed to prevention of the virus spreading in the
republic. The total of 119 cases of swine fever have been discovered
in Armenia since November 2009. As for vaccination of population,
it will be expedient to make vaccination in autumn of the current
year if the swine fever starts in Armenia again, the minister said.

BAKU: Ogtay Asadov: Europe Should Either Choose The Development In T

OGTAY ASADOV: EUROPE SHOULD EITHER CHOOSE THE DEVELOPMENT IN THE REGION, OR LISTEN TO THE FABLES OF THE ARMENIAN LOBBY

APA
March 15 2010
Azerbaijan

Baku. Elbrus Seyfullayev – APA. Speaker of Azerbaijani parliament Ogtay
Asadov received the delegation led by president of OSCE Parliamentary
Assembly Joao Soares, APA reports. Ogtay Asadov noted Azerbaijan’s
geopolitical position in the South Caucasus and spoke about the role
of the country in Europe’s energy security.

"The protracted conflicts in the region impede the region’s integration
into the European structures and development and also pose threat
to the security of the South Caucasus. The August happenings in
the region showed how dangerous the protraction of the conflicts
might be. Armenia, which ignores the resolutions and decisions on
Nagorno Karabakh conflict passed by the UN Security Council and other
international organizations, continue pursuing aggressive policy.

Armenian people have become the hostage of the political ambitions
of the Diaspora. Europe should make its choice, either choose the
development in the region, or listen to the fables of the Armenian
lobby. Azerbaijani cultural monuments, clubs, libraries have been
destroyed in Nagorno Karabakh for 20 years, the world community
closes eyes to it. Though OSCE Minsk Group has been engaged in the
solution to the problem for 18 years, unfortunately no real results
have been achieved. We support the solution to the conflict within
the international legal norms basing on the countries’ territorial
integrity," he said.

Joao Soares said during the visit to the South Caucasus he closely
familiarized with the situation and told Ogtay Asadov that he would
increase efforts for the settlement of the problem.

"The solution to the conflicts is the demand of the day in terms of
the security and development of the region," he said.

Vice-speaker of the parliament, head of the parliament’s permanent
delegation to OSCE PA Bahar Muradova also met with Joao Soares.

Azerbaijan Supports Step-By-Step Solution To Karabakh Conflict: Mamm

AZERBAIJAN SUPPORTS STEP-BY-STEP SOLUTION TO KARABAKH CONFLICT: MAMMADYAROV

news.am
March 15 2010
Armenia

Azerbaijan supports step-by-step solution to Nagorno-Karabakh conflict,
Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov told the journalists
on Monday.

"Azerbaijan supports the gradual process of the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict, because it knows that it is impossible to resolve all
problems within one day," Trend News quotes FM.

According to him, the stages of the conflict settlement are reflected
in Madrid Principles. "At the first stage the Armenian armed forces
must withdraw its troops from five regions. After withdrawal of troops,
the Armenian side must restore all communications," he added.

He considers that all roads should be open after the withdrawal of
Armenian troops from Lachin and Kalbajar.

"After Azerbaijani refugees return to Karabakh, the status of
Nagorno-Karabakh will be discussed. This is Azerbaijani land. It is
incorrect for any Azerbaijani territory to be out of the administrative
control. All will take place within the territorial integrity of
Azerbaijan. Nobody can take away the territory and escape. Whether
you like it or not, it is necessary to establish the right policy
with neighbors. Moreover, a gradual process is the best option,
because we need to remove the issue concerning the results of the war,
the occupation of Azerbaijani lands and the problem of internally
displaced people from the negotiations. The sooner this happens,
the better," Mammadyarov concluded.

Bako Sahakyan: No improvement in Armenian-Turkish relns in near futu

news.am, Armenia
March 13 2010

Bako Sahakyan: No improvement in Armenian-Turkish relations in immediate future

12:47 / 03/13/2010The Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR) will welcome
Armenian-Turkish reconciliation only if Turkey’s behavior is in
conformity with panhuman values, and the issues are settled in the
context of the nations’ past, NKR President Bako Sahakyan stated at
his meeting with students and lecturers of Artsakh State University.

The NKR President expressed the confidence that `Turkey continues its
insincere policy.’

According to him, Ankara did not properly respond to the goodwill
shown by Armenia. So any improvement in the Armenian-Turkish relations
cannot be expected in the immediate future. Turkey’s reaction to the
recognition of the Armenian Genocide by the Swedish Parliament is
evidence thereof.

`We are dealing with a nation unable to get rid of its own complexes,’
Sahakyan said.

He stressed that Turkish progressive forces stated the need for
admitting the Armenian Genocide long ago, but `the point is that
Armenia took the initiative without any preconditions.’

`From the very beginning Turkey stated it would establish diplomatic
relations with Armenia only if the Armenian side made concessions on
Nagorno-Karabakh, etc.. Under the circumstances any improvement in
relations with Turkey is impossible in the immediate future,’ the NKR
leader said.

T.P.

Ashot Ghulayan: Settlement Impossible Without Karabakh’s Participati

ASHOT GHULAYAN: SETTLEMENT IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT KARABAKH’S PARTICIPATION
Anna Nazaryan

"Radiolur"
12.03.2010 13:46

President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly Joao Soares met with the
Chairman of the NKR National Assembly Ashot Gulyan in Yerevan. The
NKR Parliament Speaker told reporters that the meeting was useful.

"We cannot imagine the resolution of the Karabakh issue without the
participation of Karabakh," Ashot Gulyan said.

Asked to comment on Goran Lenmarker’s words that it’s necessary to
solve the conflict as soon as possible, Ashot Gulyan said: "I would
also like to ask him the same question. Perhaps, you have noticed that
Lenmarker declares every year that the Karabakh issue will be solved,
but the process neither benefits not suffers from this."

"We wanted to tell the OSCE PA that we do not expect the conflict to
be solved soon without the full participation of the Karabakhi side
in the talks. When we speak about rapid resolution of any conflict,
not only Karabakh, we should take into consideration that the risk
of making mistakes is great," Ashot Gulyan noted.

Stepanakert Doesn’t Expect Fast Solution, Says Ashot Gulian

STEPANAKERT DOESN’T EXPECT FAST SOLUTION, SAYS ASHOT GULIAN

Aysor
March 12 2010
Armenia

"Stepanakert doesn’t expect fast solution to the conflict, until
Nagorno-Karabakh takes part in the talks" said Speaker of the NKR
Parliament Ashot Gulian at the press conference, following the meeting
with OSCE Parliamentary Assembly President Joao Soares.

Commenting statement by president of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly,
Goran Lennmarker, that wings should be added to the process of
settlement to the conflict, Ashot Gulian said: "Fast settlement to
the conflict poses risks of making mistakes."

Ashot Gulian pointed that during the meeting with Joao Soares
the parties had discussed domestic and foreign policies of
Nagorno-Karabakh, process of settlement to the Karabakh conflict,
and Stepanakert’s position over the issue as well as the position of
Azerbaijan, which hadn’t been changed it in relation to the people
of Nagorno-Karabakh.

"Threats, calls for war, and anti-Armenian propaganda, which are
considered by the international law as aggression," said Speaker.

The Armenian Delegation Leaving For Moscow On March 15

THE ARMENIAN DELEGATION LEAVING FOR MOSCOW ON MARCH 15

Aysor
March 12 2010
Armenia

On March 15 and 16 in Moscow will be discussed the "B" tournament play
list of "Euro-2012". On the meeting the representatives of Armenia
will be Ashot Manukyan, the vice-president of the FFA and the head
of the FFR teams department Edgar Manukyan, the press office of the
Armenian Football Federation informs.

ogether with our team in the same group are included the teams from
Russia, Slovakia, Ireland, Macedonia, Armenia and Andorra.