Russian High Priority to Modernization and Full Op. of Mars Plant

RUSSIA GIVE HIGH PRIORITY TO MODERNIZATION AND FULLY OPERATION OF MARS PLANT

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 15. ARMINFO. While meeting with Armenia’s President
Robert Kocharyan today Speaker of Russia’s State Duma Boris Gryzlov
said that Russia gives high priority to the quick modernization and
full operation of the Mars control device plant.

The sides also discussed the development of Armenian-Russian relations
in the context of international cooperation and in accordance with the
Armenian and Russian laws. Kocharyan was pleased to note that the
structure of the Armenian-Russian trade turnover has been improved
this year. Gryzlov said that the high level of Armenian-Russian
relations gives ground for hoping for more. In this light the sides
stressed the importance of the late Dec Moscow meeting of the
Armenian-Russian intergovernmental commission who is expected to
consider ways to actively operate the companies bought by Russia from
Armenia under the Assets For Debts agreement.

The sides also discussed how to intensify the transport communication
between Armenia and Russia, particularly, the railway communication
and the work of the Kavkaz ferry complex.

Unsolved Problems in 2004 Will Determine Internal Political Devs.

UNSOLVED PROBLEMS IN 2004 WILL DETERMINE INTERNAL POLITICAL
DEVELOPMENT IN ARMENIA IN 2005, VICTOR DALLAKIAN THINKS

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 14. ARMINFO. “The problems not solved in 2004 will
determine the development of the internal political situation in
Armenia also in 2005”, Secretary of the parliamentary faction of the
opposition bloc Justice Victor Dallakian stated during the meeting
with journalists at the club Pakagits.

According to him, these main issues are the settlement of the Karabakh
problem, overcome of the results of mass falsification of the
presidential election in 2003, and reveal of accomplices in political
terrorism, reveal the clients of the terrorist act in the National
Assembly on Oct 27, 1999. “Because of the suspense of these problems
in 2004 they are mechanically included in the agenda of the internal
political development in 2005. The incumbent authorities of the
republic have led the settlement of the Karabakh conflict to a
deadlock, the course of discussions in international structures
testifies. Concerning the illegitimacy of the incumbent president I
want to note it was profitable for several countries to have in our
republic an illegally elected president in order he made compromises
easily in the issue of settlement of the Karabakh problem”, Dallakian
said.

He mentioned that the way out of the internal political crisis is
possible in three main ways: to conduct a referendum on confidence in
the president, proceeding from a relevant decision of the
Constitutional Court, the dissolution of National Assembly and holding
of extraordinary parliamentary elections, and, at least, the
resignation of the president. Justice bloc rejects the first two
variants of development of the situation, as we are against formation
of marionette leadership in the republic. So, the opposition advocates
organizing a wide national movement for establishment of legal power
in the country, Victor Dallakian stressed.

Sommet Europeen: La France Demandera Reconnaissance Du Genocide

FEDERATION EURO-ARMENIENNE
pour la Justice et la Démocratie
Avenue de la Renaissance 10
B – 1000 BRUXELLES
Tel: +32 (0) 2 732 70 26
Tel./Fax : +32 (0) 2 732 70 27
E-mail : [email protected]
Web :

COMMUNIQUE DE PRESSE
13 décembre 2004
Contact: Talline Tachdjian
Tel.: +32 (0)2 732 70 27

SOMMET EUROPEEN : LA FRANCE DEMANDERA LA RECONNAISSANCE DU GENOCIDE DES
ARMENIENS

Bruxelles, Belgique – Ce lundi 13 décembre, la France a annoncé par la voix
de son Ministre des Affaires, M. Michel Barnier, qu’elle « fera la demande,
dans le courant de la négociation [avec la Turquie], d’une reconnaissance de
la tragédie du début du [20ème] siècle qui a touché plusieurs centaines de
milliers d’Arméniens ».

M. Barnier a justifié cette demande par l’exemple historique de la
réconciliation franco-allemande en déclarant : « Si, comme je le crois, le
projet européen depuis plus de 50 ans est fondé sur la réconciliation,
réconciliation entre nous – et la France et l’Allemagne ont fondé ce projet
sur cette idée-là – et puis réconciliation avec soi-même, alors je pense que
la Turquie devra, le moment venu, faire le travail de mémoire, de
réconciliation avec sa propre histoire et reconnaître cette tragédie ».

La Fédération Euro-Arménienne se félicite de cette prise de position qui
renoue avec les valeurs fondatrices de l’Union européenne. « Nous
considérons que la reconnaissance du génocide devrait être un préalable à
toute négociation avec la Turquie. Nous saluons cependant dans cette
attitude nouvelle de la France, la réaffirmation des seuls principes sur
lesquels peut être fondé un projet politique viable, stable et qui assure la
sécurité de notre continent. » a déclaré Laurent Leylekian le directeur de
la Fédération Euro-Arménienne.

« Nous voulons voir dans l’allocution de M. Barnier, qui évite délibérément
le terme de génocide et qui minimise d’un ordre de grande le nombre de
victimes, la volonté de ne pas heurter de front la Turquie négationniste
mais de l’amener de manière progressive mais ferme à cette reconnaissance »
a-t-il ajouté.

M. Leylekian a estimé par ailleurs que cette prise de position française
devrait maintenant inciter les responsables politiques européens que « le
terrorisme intellectuel contraint à réprimer leur aversion de la Turquie
xénophobe, ultra-nationaliste et négationniste » à effectuer leur «
coming-out ».

« Nous resterons néanmoins vigilant jusqu’au 17 décembre et même après :
nous réagirions avec force si cette prise de position ne s’avérait être qu’
un argument à marchander lors du sommet européen ou si elle n’était destinée
qu’à lénifier l’opinion publique française dans l’optique du référendum sur
la Constitution » a conclu le directeur de la Fédération Euro-Arménienne.

http://www.feajd.org

Armenian PM rules out “unilateral” concessions in Karabakh talks

Armenian PM rules out “unilateral” concessions in Karabakh talks – agency

Arminfo
13 Dec 04

YEREVAN

The Armenian side will make no serious unilateral concessions in the
Karabakh peace negotiations, Armenian Prime Minister Andranik
Markaryan told journalists today.

Trying to predict the possible course of developments in the Karabakh
talks in 2005, Markaryan expressed his confidence that the settlement
process would continue next year. He also expressed the hope that next
year would see some progress in the negotiations.

France asks Turkey to admit genocide

Expatica, Netherlands
Dec 13 2004

France asks Turkey to admit genocide

BRUSSELS, Dec 13 (AFP) – France wants Turkey to acknowledge the World
War One massacre of Armenians during negotiations on its membership
of the European Union, Foreign Minister Michel Barnier said Monday.

“It is a request that France will make, to recognise the tragedy from
the start of the century …. Turkey must carry out this task as a
memorial,” he told reporters after talks with his EU counterparts in
Brussels.

France’s Armenian community has vowed to press President Jacques
Chirac to prevent negotiations on Turkish membership of the European
Union until Turkey acknowledged responsibility for the massacre.

EU leaders are expected to give Turkey a conditional green light at a
summit this week to start membership talks with the block, while
setting a series of strict conditions and warning the whole process
could take at least a decade.

The Armenian massacre has been a bone of contention for nearly nine
decades, with Turkey consistently refusing to acknowledge that
genocide in 1915-1917, when up to 1.5 million Armenians died.

Turkey says that between 250,000 and 500,000 Armenians and thousands
of Turks were killed in civil strife during World War One, when the
Armenians rose up against their Ottoman rulers.

The French parliament passed legislation in 2001 stating that
genocide had occurred, thereby causing hard feelings in relations
with Turkey.

“If You Only Were As Brave As Ataturk”

“IF YOU ONLY WERE AS BRAVE AS ATATURK”

Azg/arm
11 Dec 04

Response to Turkish General’s Letter

In his response to Turkish general Orhan Tan’s words that “all the
authors of articles on Armenian-Turkish relations I ever read during
my student years at the US military school had second names ending in
â=80=98yan'” cited in Azg Daily’ s November 30 article titled “Turks
and Armenians Can Live in Peace” Misak Keleshian from Beirut writes:
“I studied in the States too and came across many authors who do not
have names ending in â=80=98yan’. If dear general is willing, I shall
mention some of them”. Here the reader presents 6 pages of names of
numerous reliable specialists who have spoken of the Armenian
Genocide. Below we have posted responses to the historic events as
eyewitnesses saw them.

“Lack of pages does not allow me to write about thousands of people
who were crucified, thrown into the rivers, cut by swords or axes,
burnet in their houses or churches or were objected to such tortures
that can never be repeated”, Rose Lambert, “Hadjin and the Armenian
Massacres”.

“It has been a month that the Kurdish and Turkish population of
Armenia massacre Armenians with the permission of Ottoman
authorities. Such massacres were carried out in Erzrum, Van, Dersin,
Akin, Tiflis, Mush, Sassoon, Zeytun and all over Cilicia. All
population of Van’s surrounding villages was slaughtered. Armenian
district of the town is sealed off by the Kurds. Considering this new
atrocities against humanity and civilization carried by Turkey, ally
states declare publicly that they will hold responsible all the
members and agentsof the Ottoman government who had hand in the
massacres”, reads the joint declaration of Russia, Great Britain and
France published on May 24 of 1915.

Here Misak Keleshian pauses to emphasize 3 exceptional facts. The
phrase “atrocity against humanity” appears in an official document for
the first time, secondly, heads of a country are held responsible for
the first time and thirdly, the word “new” is used hinting that never
the history of human kind has seen such evil.

“I think that it is not the deportation that is to be protested but
the awful cruelties that accompanied it. This one of the blackest
pages in the history of this war and I think our interference is
justified”, Robert Lansing, US Secretary of State (extract from a
letter send to President Wilson on November 21 of 1916).

“Taleat Pasha, interior minister, has honestly confessed that the
Turkish government is going to take advantage of the world war to
settle up accounts with its inner enemies. Turkey’s aim is to
â=80=98settle the Armenian Cause by eliminating the Armenian nation'”,
Baron Hans von Wangenheim.

And finally Mustafa Kemal Ataturk’s article in The Los Angeles
Examiner’s August 1 issue of 1926 which reads: “Those remnants from
the Young Turksâ=80=99 Party must face justice for withdrawing
millions of our Christian nationals from their houses and killing them
in great numbers”.

Misak Keleshian asks dear general if this last statement was unknown
to him either? Is it appropriate to insist on numbers of 250 or 500
thousand when the founder of Turkish republic and Turkey’s national
hero himself mentions of “millions” and “great numbers”?

“I am glad when a high-ranking Turkish official writes that
â=80=98Armenians and Turks can live in peace’ but I would be even
gladder if you were ascourageous as you commander-in-chief was, and
recognized the Genocide. That would be a heroic act not only within
Turkey but within the whole world.

This is a wrong policy that Turkey has adopted and a heavy burden on
the republic’s shoulders. It should have condemned the Young Turks,
punish them and to lighten the burden. In that case the two countries
would regain peace, and your country would be braver in knocking
European community’s doors.

Anyone denying the history is under the threat of repeating it”, Misak
Keshishian rounds off his letter to general Tan.

Yerevan Journal: For Young Armenians, Promised Land Without Promise

The New York Times:

Yerevan Journal: For Young Armenians, a Promised Land Without Promise

December 9, 2004
By SUSAN SACHS

YEREVAN, Armenia – In a smoky corner of the Red Bull bar, a favorite
hangout for university students, Zara Amatuni mulled over the reasons
she would leave her homeland.

“It’s poor, it has no natural resources, it has an undeveloped economy
and it’s unlikely to be developing in the next 10 years,” she said
with a small apologetic shrug.

Ms. Amatuni, 21, imagines herself in London or perhaps Moscow. Her
language skills might land her a well-paying job, and plenty of
Armenians have marked the trail before her.

“We can fit in anywhere,” she said. “The only place we can’t is
Armenia.”

For young people who have come of age in an independent Armenia, a
country the size of Maryland with a population of barely three million
people, it is an awkward paradox.

Their parents grew up in a captive republic of the Soviet Union. Their
grandparents escaped the massacre of Armenians by Turks in the years
of World War I. For them, and for the four-million-strong Armenian
diaspora, the creation of a sovereign Armenian homeland 13 years ago
was the fulfillment of a dream.

Yet the promised land has proved too constricting and its promise too
distant for the next generation’s ambitions. Those who want to leave
and those who want to stay are all trying to reconcile what it means
to be Armenian.

For some, no longer being part of the empire that was the Soviet Union
means a loss of significance in the world. Then there were
opportunities for well-educated Armenians to work in Moscow and
elsewhere. Independence, they had hoped, would propel Armenia into the
wider world, important on its own. Instead, they find themselves in a
backwater with a double-digit unemployment rate and where most of the
decent-paying jobs are with international aid organizations. “Let us
build Armenia here,” said Artyom Simonian, an acting student in the
struggling town of Gyumri, 75 miles northwest of the capital, where
residents are still recovering from a devastating 1988 earthquake.

He is one of those nostalgic for an imagined past. Like many of his
fellow students, Mr. Simonian, 21, was uncomfortable with what seem to
be the country’s choices, integration with Europe or tighter bonds
with Russia.

“We are trying to love foreigners too much,” he said.

He and some other students, gathered around a small table in the
chilly cafeteria of the Gyumri Arts School, understand they have fewer
opportunities than did their parents, who learned to speak Russian and
assimilated Russian culture.

So they long for a bigger, more muscular Armenia, a land that would
embrace what is now southeastern Turkey where their ancestors lived a
century ago. The snowy crest of Mount Ararat, now on the other side of
the border, floats on the horizon beyond Gyumri as a reminder of that
phantom homeland.

“I won’t consider myself Armenian until all of sacred Mount Ararat is
in Armenia,” said Alexan Gevorgian, a theater student. He saw the
world as essentially hostile and neighboring Turkey, just 15 miles to
the west, as “an animal waiting for its prey to weaken.”

His bitterness was too much for Ludvig Harutiunian, the student
council president.

“We young people should leave this hostility behind,” he
protested. “I’d like Armenia to be known for good things, not genocide
and wars and victims and mourning.”

Mr. Harutiunian had evaluated his prospects. His father was already
working in Russia, his brother was working in Spain and he was
resigned to finding a chance for artistic expression elsewhere.

“Leaving the difficulties aside, Armenian culture is not developing
and you have to go out,” he said.

Mr. Simonian interrupted, chiding, “It’s wrong to leave the country.”
The other students fell silent.

The insular views of some of these young people dismay older Armenians
who have a sharp sense of how their own horizons have shrunk since
independence.

“For 70 years we lived in a different country, where we were open to
Russian culture and history,” said Svetlana Muradian, a mother of six
in Gyumri who used to work in Russia but now supports her family with
odd jobs. “Kids now see nothing beyond Armenia. My only hope is that
my three sons will grow up and leave.”

The students gathered in the Red Bull bar in Yerevan were struggling
with a different facet of the same predicament. Fluent in English and
Russian as well as their native Armenian, they were impatient with the
growing pains of a post-Soviet state and cynical about politics.

To Gevorg Karapetian, a doctoral student in computer engineering, the
ideal leader would be a businessman, “someone educated and clever
enough to make relationships with the neighboring countries.”

The present crowd of politicians did not measure up. “Our president
and all the presidents before him just want to be president,”
Mr. Karapetian said.

Unlike the less privileged students in Gyumri, he and his friends in
the capital have reached out beyond Armenia’s borders. They get their
news from the Internet and use the Web to chat with English speakers
from around the world. They regularly meet Armenians from the United
States and Russia who come to visit Armenia, to teach at the
universities, plant trees or to set up charities.

But their relative sophistication also makes them keenly aware of the
contrast between their aspirations and their country’s opportunities.

Victor Agababov, 22, earns the princely sum of $650 a month working as
a computer programmer in Yerevan, making him the best paid member of
his university class. Yet he tends to mock his own achievement because
his job involves doing outsourced work transferred from the United
States and Japan.

“We are a cheap work force,” he said. “We’re cheaper than Indians and
probably 10 times cheaper than Americans.”

Mr. Agababov is considering moving to Moscow to find a technology job
that might promise advancement and independence.

As far the Armenian-Americans and other diaspora visitors who say they
yearn to come to the new Armenia, Mr. Agababov and Zara Amatuni, the
linguistics student, have a suggestion.

“We can swap,” Mr. Agababov said.

“Right,” said Ms. Amatuni. “They can come back and we can
go there.”

;ei=1&en=6d2586ff32389cba

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/09/international/asia/09armenia.html?ex=1103614490&amp

Armenia to quit Karabakh talks if UN adopts pro-Azeri resolution

Armenia to quit Karabakh talks if UN adopts pro-Azeri resolution

Arminfo
4 Dec 04

YEREVAN

If the UN adopts the draft resolution [on the situation in
Azerbaijan’s occupied territories], Armenia will not participate in
the negotiations individually and will demand that Nagornyy Karabakh
join the talks, Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan has told
Armenia’s Kentron TV.

It is because [if the UN adopts the draft] the issue will go beyond
the framework of the OSCE Minsk Group and in that case, Armenia will
not be able to conduct any talks individually, Oskanyan said. He added
that the Minsk Group co-chairs in fact recognize Nagornyy Karabakh as
a side to the conflict and that this is obvious from the fact that the
co-chairs go to Nagornyy Karabakh during their every visit to the
region.

Oskanyan said that if Armenia had not assumed the role of a
negotiating side when Azerbaijan refused to start negotiations with
Nagornyy Karabakh, there would have been no talks. He believes that
Armenia’s participation in the negotiations is right. “It is also
right that [Armenian President] Robert Kocharyan is conducting these
talks,” the minister added.

Talking about the consequences of the UN resolution on this issue, the
foreign minister said that if the resolution is adopted, Armenia will
really abandon the bilateral negotiations.

“If Azerbaijan agrees to Arkadiy Gukasyan’s [president of the
self-styled Nagornyy Karabakh republic] joining the talks, we will
continue. If not, responsibility will lie with them,” he said, adding
that the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs have already expressed their
concern over the issue.

Oskanyan said that in this case, the issue of negotiations between
Azerbaijan and Nagornyy Karabakh will be raised openly. Armenia can
play only the role of a guarantor in this case.

“We will raise the issue from the angle of 1992 in order to better
inform the international community of the real causes of the current
situation,” Oskanyan said, adding that the issue of Nagornyy
Karabakh’s self-determination will be seriously raised in the end.

Saakashvili Hasn’t Been in Javakhk

SAAKASHVILI HASN’T BEEN IN JAVAKHK

A1+
02-12-2004

Well-known Georgian political analyst Paata Zakareishvili, one of
current Georgian president Mikhail Saakashvili’s devoted supporters,
finds it a bad sign that Saakashvili never once visited
Armenians-dominated Samtskhe-Javakhk region throughout his election
campaign and presidency but many times toured Kvemo Kartli
instead. Azerbaijanis make the bulk of Kvemo Kartli provinceâ=80=99s
population.

`It leads to conclusion that he doesn’t care about the situation in
Javakhk’ , A-Info news agency quotes Zakareishvili as saying in an
interview with Southern Gates weekly.

The political analyst notes that Sahakashvili’s indifferent attitude
toward Javakhk can’t be replaced with his wife Sandra Rulofs’ frequent
visits to the province, as people elected him, not her as president.

Zakareishvili is convinced the president has no any welfare program
for the region. However, unlike Abkhazia and South Ossetia, Javakhk
has sworn allegiance to the current president. Zakareishvili thinks
such a step deserves respect.

`If people didn’t revolt against us, we should respect themand
allocate money for the region development’, Zakareishvili said.

Government In Session

GOVERNMENT IN SESSION

A1+
25-11-2004

GOVERNMENT LAVISHES MONEY FOR WORLD WAR II VETERANS

On Thursday, Armenian government approved amendments to the law on
World War II veterans at its regular session.

The amendments envisage a 3,000-dram benefit for veterans and
4,500-dram benefit for disabled veterans to help them pay for utilities
and public transportation.

GOVERNMENT FORK OUT MONEY FOR LAW-INCOME FAMILIES

The government also decided that families living in poverty will pay
only 30% for round-the-clock water supply and 15% in the event of a
few-hour daily water supply.

OTHER DECISIONS

Amendments were made also in the 2003 government’s decision on
Armenia’s representatives in European Court.

The government included Kotayk region’s areas in the list of
state-protected territories intended for rest.