International Friendly Preview: Estonia – Brazil

INTERNATIONAL FRIENDLY PREVIEW: ESTONIA – BRAZIL

Goal.com
12 Aug 2009 01:51:47

The Selecao are expected to claim a comprehensive victory against
the inexperienced Northern Europeans…

Kick-off: Wednesday 12 August 2009, 13:15 ET, Tallinn, Estonia Chance
To Make History

Even if Estonia won’t be in South Africa next year, their high-profile
friendly with five-time world champions Brazil in Tallinn has caught
the imagination of the nation’s 1,340,000 inhabitants. The La Coq
Arena will be packed to the rafters, in the first ever clash between
the sides, and even if the locals will be hoping to witness vibrant
attacking football from Brazil, there’s no doubt that they will be
hoping their nation team can make some football history.

With only one win in six World Cup qualifiers, Estonia have shown that
they don’t have enough depth to compete with established football
nations. But after being humiliated 7-0 by Bosnia-Herzegovina and
losing 3-0 to Spain, they claimed a motivating draw against Turkey,
another draw with Armenia, and in their last qualifier against Armenia
again, in Tallinn in April, they claimed the three points. There’s
enough evidence to suggest that the team from the Baltic region are
improving, and with upcoming games in Turkey and Spain they will be
hoping to continue their impressive run of results. Ranked 112th in
the current FIFA World rankings, a victory would be too much to ask
against the no.1 ranked team in the world.

But in order not to slump to a heavy defeat against the Brazilians,
Estonia will have to concentrate on their game at all moments, even if
dealing with the likes of Kaka, Daniel Alves, Robinho and Luis Fabiano
seems an almost impossible task. With few internationally recognised
players, team spirit and motivation are the only two things that can
save Estonia some face.

Ready For Shooting Practise?

With their Confederations Cup success Brazil demonstrated to the world
that they are the team to beat heading into next year’s World Cup
in South Africa. After a relatively slow start to their qualifying
campaign Dunga has managed to find the ideal blend, and the Selecao
are leading the strong South American group in style, and are just a
game away from securing a World Cup berth. Brazil will take the game
against Estonia — which will be their first since the Confederations
Cup final — as light preparation ahead of the decisive World Cup
qualifier against arch-rivals Argentina in Rosario and the game with
Chile in Salvador, in September.

Since the Confederations Cup Brazil’s players have been on vacation,
and most have played little competitive football. The star of the
side — Kaka — has played two incomplete matches since joining
Real Madrid from AC Milan, but will return to his national team
colours. Despite facing weak opponents, Brazil will take the game
very seriously, not only because they are always pressured to win,
but because World Cup spots are up for grabs.

When taking history and current form into account, the Brazilians are
expected to run riot in Tallinn. Brazil have scored plenty of goals in
recent outings — including 14 goals in 5 matches of the Confederations
Cup — and are expected to continue to fire on all cylinders against
Estonia. Dunga knows that his team have loads of attacking flair,
but he still believes they have room for improvement. Even if Luis
Fabiano and Robinho are his desired attacking partnership, he will
surely present Diego Tardelli and Nilmar with opportunities.

TEAM NEWS Estonia Tarmo Ruutli will pretty much count with a full
strength side against the Brazilians. He will be delighted with the
news that team captain Raio Piiroja has recovered from injury just
in time and will be fit to lead the side in one of the most important
matches of their history.

Probable starting XI: Sergei Pareiko, Enar Jaager, Raio Piiroja,
Alo Barengrub, Ragnar Klavan, Martin Vunk, Aleksandr Dmitrijev,
Ats Purje, Konstantin Vassiljev, Kristen Viikmae and Serguei Zenjov.

Brazil The biggest news in the Brazil camp is that Dunga has left out
Ronaldinho once again, and will give newcomers Filipe Luis of Deportivo
La Coruna and Diego Tardelli of Atletico Mineiro opportunities to prove
their worth. Players like Nilmar and Ramires — who played brilliantly
in the Confederations Cup — are likely to come on in the second half.

Probable starting XI: Julio Cesar, Daniel Alves, Lucio, Juan,
Filipe Luis, Gilberto Silva, Elano, Felipe Melo, Kaka, Robinho and
Luis Fabiano.

PLAYERS TO WATCH Estonia – Ragnar Klavan The fact that Ragnar Klavan
plays his club football for AZ Alkmaar in the Dutch First Division,
means that he has gained an advantage over his teammates in terms of
experience, because the majority of his teammates still play their
football in Europe’s lower leagues. The 23-year-old defender has
already made more than 50 appearances for his national team, and
will need to be at his very best in order to help his side avoid a
heavy defeat.

Brazil – Kaka The recent Real Madrid acquisition continues to be one
of the most exciting attacking midfielders in the world, and he is
hoping to turn on the style against Estonia. In recent months Kaka
has become the inspiration of the Selecao, and if he is switched
on there is no doubt Brazil will claim a comprehensive victory in
Tallinn. Kaka is likely to be the star of the show.

PREDICTION At the moment, Brazil are the strongest team in the world
and they are expected to cruise past an Estonia side that lacks
quality. But the Selecao can’t afford to be overconfident because
the Estonians will play their hearts out in order to cause a major
upset. If Estonia manage to claim a victory in Tallinn it will surely
go down in Estonian football history.

Estonia 0-3 Brazil Gregory Sica, Goal.com

In July 2009 South Caucasus Railways Carried 251,085 Tons Of Cargo

IN JULY 2009 SOUTH CAUCASUS RAILWAYS CARRIED 251,085 TONS OF CARGO

ArmInfo
2009-08-11 18:55:00

ArmInfo. In July 2009 South Caucasus Railways carried 251,085 tons
of cargo with the cargo turnover totalling 58.778mln ton/km – 90.4%
of the plan.

The press service of the company reports that 24,614 tons were exported
(38.7% of the plan). The greater part of the exported cargo was cement,
construction materials, metal scrap, raw materials, metal concentrates.

98,045 tons were imported (96.1% of the plan): sugar, grain, oil
products, fertilizers, metal.

113,607 tons were carried inside Armenia (101.4% of the plan): raw
materials, cement, non-ferrous ore.

South Caucasus Railways is 100% subsidiary of Russian Ralways. The
company has a 30-year concession over Armenian Railways.

Hayk Babukhanyan: Let Ankara Think Itself How To Open Borders, It’s

HAYK BABUKHANYAN: LET ANKARA THINK ITSELF HOW TO OPEN BORDERS, IT’S NOT OUR PROBLEM

PanARMENIAN.Net/
11.08.2009 16:27 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "All the problems associated with Armenia turned
into a ball, which will be unleashed this fall," Hayk Babukhanyan ,
leader of the Constitutional law union told a press conference in
Yerevan today. According to him, now the Armenian-Turkish border
became a border between the CSTO and NATO.

Concerning the process of normalization of the Armenian-Turkish
relations and opening the border, Babukhanyan stressed that he wouldn’t
call this as ‘opening of the Armenian-Turkish border’, since Turkey
closed the border, and now it’s deblocking takes place. "It’s not our
problem and let Ankara think itself how to open borders. We have helped
them enough already," Babukhanyan said. He also said, that the entire
region will benefit from the opening of the Armenian-Turkish border.

Mr. Babukhanyan also stressed that Turkey must be more interested in
opening the border, because it wants to gain access to Europe and to
join EU.

Georgian authorities planning provocation against Vahagn Chakhalyan

"YERKIR" UNION OF NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS FOR REPATRIATION AND
SETTLEMENT

Press-release
Contact: Robert Tatoyan
Mobile: +(374 94) 36 17 93
E-mail: [email protected]

August 10, 2009
Yerevan, Armenia

THE GEORGIAN AUTHORITIES ARE PLANNING A PROVOCATION AGAINST JAVAKHETI
ARMENIAN POLITICAL PRISONER VAHAGN CHAKHALYAN

«Yerkir» Union became aware through reliable sources, that the Georgian
authorities are planning a provocation against Javakheti Armenian political
activist Vahagn Chakhalyan, aimed at physical liquidation or neutralization
of the latter.

The reliability of this information is indirectly supported by the fact that
on the 31st of July, 2009 Vahagn Chakhalyan was transferred from Gldani
prison ?-8 of Tbilisi to the general regime colony ?-2 in Rustavi, where the
conditions for a possible provocation are much more favorable.

«Yerkir» Union states that the responsibility for possible provocation
against Vahagn Chakhalyan lies personally and directly on the Georgian
President -Mikheil Saakashvili and the Minister of Internal Affairs of
Georgia -Vano Merabishvili.

«Yerkir» Union calls upon the Georgian authorities to guarantee the safety
of Vahagn Chakhalyan and to this end to transfer Javakheti activist back to
his former place of detention.

«Yerkir» Union asks the Public Defender of Georgia Sozar Subari, the
international human rights organizations, and accredited diplomatic missions
in Georgia to take effective steps to ensure the personal safety of Vahagn
Chakhalyan.

Hagopian: Jerusalem Odyssey: Part 1, The Return

Hagopian: Jerusalem Odyssey: Part 1, The Return

n-jerusalem-odyssey-part-1-the-return/
By Arthur Hagopian – on August 5, 2009

Arthur Hagopian, the former press officer of the Armenian Patriarchate
of Jerusalem, who currently lives in Australia, has just returned from
a short visit to the Old City after a 15-year hiatus. This is the
first in a series of articles he will be writing during his brief
sojourn there.

JERUSALEM. The 777 Thai Airways took off from Sydney more than a
quarter of an hour late, but the crew made up for it with an abundance
of solicitous courtesy and exemplary service.

It would be a 9-hour flight to Bangkok and then another grueling 11
hours aboard an El Al 767 bound for Tel Aviv.

For the first time in 15 years, I was returning to Jerusalem, the city
of my birth, on an odyssey fraught with expectation and a modicum of
trepidation.

It would be a journey of rediscovery and reacquaintance.

I dislike flying, but the offer made to me by a North American film
company – to go to Jerusalem and act as an advisor, guide, and
consultant to the producer – was one I could not refuse.

`I’ll take a knockout pill and sleep throughout the flight,’ I said.

With this thought to buttress me, and some Zen training to boost my
courage, I got aboard the plane.

Thankfully, air turbulence put on a desultory performance, and I
managed to put up with the occasional buffeting of the aircraft. There
was even no need for a sleeping tablet: The laptop kept me occupied
for a few hours and the fine in-flight collection of new videos helped
while away the time. The landing, which I had thought of as a dreaded
passage to purgatory, was smooth, as if choreographed by a maestro.

was travelling on my Australian passport but as I handed it to border
control at the Tel Aviv airport, the word `Jerusalem’ seemed to jump
out of the page, piquing the interest of the Israeli officer on duty.

`You are a Sabra?’ he asked with a broad smile, using the popular
appellation for native Jews.

His fingers were flying over the computer.

`Actually, I am not Jewish,’ I told him.

His fingers paused for a minute, and a frown creased his face.

`Please to wait,’ he told me, motioning me aside, as other passengers
streamed by. Their passports hardly merited more than a cursory
inspection.

I had heard of instances of returning non-Jewish Jerusalemites, who
had obtained foreign citizenship, being subjected to what amounted to
the third-degree upon arrival at Israeli ports of entry. There had
even been reports of people being forced to give up their Israeli IDs
in order to enter or leave the country.

But I had a different agenda.

`Is there a problem?’ I asked.

`No problem. Just one minute.’

It was taking longer than that.

`Look,’ I said. `I am a foreign correspondent. I have been invited
here as an advisor on a feature film about Jerusalem which will be
made by a North American company. I have a meeting in an hour’s time
with the producers. I need to be there.’

`Wait please,’ he said again.

`I cannot wait,’ I countered. `If there is a problem, take it up with
the Government Press Office [GPO]. I am supposed to be driving to
Jerusalem now. You’re going to make me late.’

The GPO, an adjunct of the Prime Minister’s office, was the official
body catering to the foreign press corps in Israel.

`Just one moment, please.’ He picked up his phone.

I flipped open my mobile and started to make some calls of my own – to
the producers to explain the delay and to old contacts within the GPO
and other governmental departments.

I raised my voice to make a point and noticed the officer watching me
intently. Suddenly, he got up and hurried out. A few minutes later, I
was called back to another office by a policewoman.

`Welcome to Israel,’ she said with a coquettish smile, handing over my
passport.

I checked the pages. They had issued me with a B2 tourist visa, valid
for three months. I wasn’t staying that long, two weeks at most. Some
travelers, particularly those who later intend on visiting neighboring
Arab countries or places not friendly to Israel, usually ask that
their passports not be stamped to avoid problems at border
crossings. Instead, they are issued visas on a separate card or piece
of paper, as there is genuine concern that the imprint of an Israeli
stamp on their passports would automatically bar them entry into
Syria, Lebanon, Iran, or other blacklisted spots.

I thanked the girl and made my way out.

We drove to Jerusalem in a sherut, a shared cab, a convenient way to
travel if you do not mind the runaround and hassle: Each passenger has
to be dropped off at his destination in and around the city one by
one. You have to sit out your turn.

And forget about road courtesy. It has been said that Israelis drive
their cars as if they are tanks, to the dismay of pedestrians who have
to race them across zebra crossings. Giving way seems an alien
imposition, blithely ignored.

The driver had his mobile glued to his ear while manipulating his car
with his left hand, signals were neither used nor acknowledged, and he
made lavish use of the horn to punctuate a point or argument.

Parking, I found out, is one luxury that is almost universally denied
Jerusalem’s hapless motorists. Old City residents in particular are so
desperate that they are willing to pay up to $100 a month for a spot –
some a brisk 10-minute walk from their homes.

On both sides of the highway, stunted olive trees jutted out in
hesitant exultation over scree and boulder as they sought purchase in
rocky pastures, while occasional patches of greenery gave promise of
abundance in the politically troubled land of milk and honey.

My fellow passengers were a loquacious lot, bubbling with excitement
at the prospect of seeing `Yerushalaym’ – a few of them for the first
time.

`I’ve been away 14 years, and have come back to recharge my
batteries,’ one religious Jew from Baltimore, Md., said, adjusting his
black kippa (yarmulka).

As we neared the approaches to the city, an unsettling sight greeted
us: huge furrows in the road, gouging out a path for a proposed
railroad that would serve Jerusalem and outlying suburbs. It was an
eyesore many people I talked to detested.

`This is madness,’ one Israeli later commented to me. `Who needs a
train to Pisgat Ze’ev or French Hill [two Jewish suburbs minutes away
from the city center]?’

Many Arabs call it a desecration.

At the threshold to Jaffa Gate, a new tunnel had been churned out of
the earth to channel traffic around the Old City, but the hole is
regarded as further perfidy by purists.

`Town Hall has lost its senses, piling ugliness upon ugliness on our
beautiful Jerusalem,’ mourned an elderly Jew.

Inside the Old City itself, however, the planners had kept their picks
and shovels under wraps, and desisted from tampering too noticeably
with its ancient hallowedness.

The sherut crawled up Jaffa Gate and as it disgorged its last
passenger, I was struck by the teeming crowds of tourists,
interspersed by the pervading presence of security men and women,
bristling with full riot equipment. They had staked claims to every
strategic corner or road, their appearance intended to be reassuring
to visitors, but a cause of mute and bitter anguish for the city’s
Arab citizens.

I dumped my bags in the private apartment I had rented in the
Christian Quarter, and hurried to keep my appointment with the film
producers.

http://www.hairenik.com/weekly/2009/08/05/hagopia

Armenia and Turkey not to forget about time during talks

Armenia and Turkey not to forget about time during talks
08.08.2009 16:20 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ `Armenian President’s statement concerning
time-limits in Armenian-Turkish normalization process was to the
point,’ Heritage faction MP Stepan Safaryan told a PanARMENIAN.Net
correspondent.
>From the very start of the talks, Armenian leadership, forgot about
time factor, a very important point `Heritage’ always called attention
to, Safaryan said. But the situation, according to him, changed for
the better after Armenian President’s recent statement on visiting
Turkey only in case of having open borders or undertaking real steps
towards lifting the blockade

Is classical music for funerals?

aysor.am, Armenia
Aug 7 2009

Is classical music for funerals?

`They tell me `Your estrade’ I tell them `I have no connection with
it’. I ask a question to myself `with what do I have a connection? Who
am I? In which genre do I create?’ I can’t answer, I do not know as it
is not an estrade any more. It is too far from the present so called
estrade’,- thinks Emma Petrosyan, a signer who during the meeting with
the journalists tried to find out why the music and singing started to
degrade as a result of which the values started to lose their
significance.

To E. Petrosyan’s opinion the genres have been mixed during some
time. According to her the founder of Armenian pop music as many
others think is not Arthur Grigoryan. She, being one of the founders
of `Ayo show’ together with Arthur Grigoryan, assured that once an
army of individuals gathered together who have become authors of many
wonderful works.

`That time I didn’t know what I was doing, why I was doing? I just was
doing something I couldn’t not to do. I suppose we had wonderful roots
like Tatevik Hovhannisyan, Erna Yuzbashyan, Elvina Makaryan, Georgi
Minasyan, Orbelyan¦ a very strong school’,- remembered Petrosyan
and added, `Suddenly half-educated people came out, who decided that
they can do something.’

`They started to record everyone and covered with these records
everything.’ In the result of this according to E. Petrosyan the bad
music spread so quickly that she doesn’t even know how to prevent or
stop its circulation.

To the question why the bad music is not being criticized by the
artists and the corresponding professionals E. Petrosyan answered
`Everyone is tired of criticizing as nothing is being changed.’ She
said that her criticism and her opinion is being heard only by her own
students who understand and accept it.

ANKARA: `Peace Passage’ over Aras River

Hurriyet Daily News, Turkey
Aug 3 2009

`Peace Passage’ over Aras River

Monday, August 3, 2009
VERCÄ°HAN ZÄ°FLÄ°OÄ?LU
YEREVAN – Hürriyet Daily News

Armenia is calling on Turkey to help build a ‘peace passage’ over the
Aras River. Former deputy culture minister of Armenia, Gagik
Gürcüyan, talks about the history of the restoration
process for the Surp Haç (Saint Cross) Church on Akdamar island
in the eastern city of Van.

Armenia has called on Turkey to help build a `peace passage’ between
the two countries.

The president of the Armenia International Council of Monuments and
Sites, and former deputy culture minister of Armenia, Gagik
Gürcüyan, has proposed restoring the millennia-old
bridge at the Ani ruins. Located on both sides of the Aras River, with
one end in Turkey and the other in Armenia, his idea was to reopen the
bridge as a peace passage between the two countries.

Gürcüyan, who served as deputy minister from 2004 to
2009, explained the details of the restoration process for the
historic Surp Haç Church on Akdamar Island in Lake Van in the
eastern district of GevaÅ?.

First official contact with Armenia

`Everyone thinks the dialogue process between Turkey and Armenia
started last year during the national football game. This is a big
mistake,’ Gürcüyan told the Hürriyet Daily News &
Economic Review. He said the first official contact between the two
countries started during the restoration process of the Surp
Haç Church by former culture minister Atilla Koç.

`Right after the general elections in Turkey in 2007, Koç was
left out of the new Cabinet. If he remained in the Cabinet, he would
have started the first official contact with his Armenian counterparts
for the restoration of the Ani ruins. It was bad luck,’ he said.

Controversial cross at the Patriarchate

Gürcüyan, who is also an architect, has closely followed
the restoration process of the church. He said the restoration was
flawless, but that the cross was not put on top of the historic church
because the media in both countries had politicized the issue. `The
manner of media made the process tense. The issue was brought into the
political arena. Otherwise the cross would have been put in its former
place.’

Gürcüyan said the cross that was delivered to the
Turkish Armenian Patriarch Mesrop Mutafyan was a true copy of the
original. He said he believed the cross would be put in its original
place in the near future.

Armenian draft in world congresses

The joint restoration work to be carried out for the Ani Ruins could
make great contributions to Turkish`Armenian relations,
Gürcüyan said. `First of all we can restore the ruined
bridge over the Aras River. We can connect the two countries thanks to
this bridge and call it a peace passage,’ he said.

He said UNESCO had come up with the same idea 10 years ago but was not
able to fulfill it. `As the ministry, we sent a letter to Turkey via
the Moscow Embassy saying that we were ready to realize this
project. It was the beginning of the 2000s and the Armenian draft was
highlighted in world congresses. This is why the project was stopped.’

Yerevan and St. Petersburg documents

Russians carried out the most comprehensive work on the Ani Ruins from
1896 to 1918, according to Gürcüyan. He said an Armenian
scientist Toros Toramanyan joined the research and the resulting
documents were collected at the St. Petersburg Royal Academy and in
the Armenian National Archives.

There were hundreds of drawings, documents and information in the
archived documents, Gürcüyan said. `We are ready to
share all types of documents for the restoration of the Ani Ruins to
be finished in the shortest time and in the best way. We want to be a
part of the restoration process,’ he said.

Russia signs deal to build Turkey’s first nuclear power plant

Russia signs deal to build Turkey’s first nuclear power plant

ANKARA, August 6 (RIA Novosti) – The prime ministers of Russia and
Turkey signed an agreement Thursday on the two countries’ nuclear
cooperation and Russian firms’ participation in the construction of
Turkey’s first nuclear power plant.
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said Russia would soon
coordinate construction details with the Turkish authorities and start
implementing the project.
"We intend to coordinate the details shortly and start the
construction," he said after a meeting with his Turkish counterpart,
Tayyip Erdogan.
"The victory of a Russian-Turkish consortium in the tender to build
Turkey’s first NPP opens wide opportunities for our countries. Both
sides are evidently interested in the project," Putin said.
He added that the Russian price to build the Turkish nuclear plant was
50% lower than the U.S. price.
The plant is due to be built on the Mediterranean coast near Akkuyu. A
consortium made up of Russia’ Atomstroyexport, Inter RAO UES and
Turkey’s Park Teknik participated in the tender.
Turkish nuclear authorities in May ruled that the consortium’s tender
proposal that included the construction of four 1,200 MW power units
was in line with all technological criteria.

JAVAKHQ: Historical Outline (Part I)

JAVAKHQ: HISTORICAL OUTLINE (PART I)
By Ashot Melkonian

04/javakhq-historical-outline-part-i/
August 4, 2009

The rights to the English translation and publication of this
article-which will appear in this and next week’s issue of the Armenian
Weekly-belong to the Hairenik Association.

Part I: From Javakhq’s Historical Past

Gugarq, the 13th of the 15 regions (ashkhars) of historical Armenia’s
Metz Haiq (Greater Armenia) Kingdom, covered the northern section
of the Armenian Highlands. In the east, it bordered on the province
of Utiq; in the west, of Tayq; in the south, of Ayrarat; and in
the north it bordered on Iberia (Virq, Georgia). Its administrative
center was the city of Tsurtav. Gugarq was one of the four borderline
counties of the Armenian Kingdom and, at times, it enjoyed a certain
autonomy. According to some Georgian historians, the name Gugarq
has a Georgian origin, and it derives from the inhabitants of the
region who were called "Gogars" or "Gargars." But Armenian sources
do not mention such an ethnicity. As for the land of the Gargars,
it has no correlation with Gugarq.

The nine constituent counties of Gugarq were Dzoropor, Koghbopor,
Tzobopor, Tashir, Treghq, Kangarq, Kgharjq, Upper Javakhq, and
Artahan. Up to the first partition of Armenia (387 A.D.), the region
also included neighboring Shavshet, Inner Javakhq, Mangleatspor,
Qwishapor, Boghnopor, Khantsikhen, and Paruar. The total area covered
more than 16,500 square kilometers.

Javakhq is mentioned as eighth in rank of the Gugarq counties. It
was located in the central part of the region and covered areas of
the plateau of the same name (the headland of Akhalqalaq, upland of
Javakhq) and the mountainous area surrounding the latter, bordering
on Treghq (Trialet) in the north, on Samsar and Javakhq mountains
(Kechut, Mtin) in the east, and in the south, on the headland forming
the extension of the Ashotsq plateau.

In historiography, different points of view are offered on the
terminology of the name "Javakhq." According to the Georgian writer
Leonti Mroveli (author of Annals of Qartli and The Life of Qartli),
the plain of Kur, the environs of the river Potskhov (historic
Samtskhe province, now Akhaltskha), and other surrounding lands were
inherited by Javakhos, son of Mtskhetos, grandson of the ancestor of
the Georgians, Qartlos. After Javakhos, the region has been called
Javakhq, Javakheti in Georgian. However, rightfully considering this
"thesis" mythological and overly simplistic, many later researchers
have attempted to find other explanations. Some, having in mind the
region’s favorable climate for growing barley, have connected javi,
the Georgian word for barley, with the name. Others have tried to
find in the area an ethnic race of Javakhis.

In reality, the place-name of Javakhq, as is evident in the
inscriptions of Van (Kingdom of Van)-where it is mentioned from the
close of the 9th century B.C.-is a transliterated variant of the land
called "Zabakha" or "Zabakhian": Zabakha-Jabakha-Javakha-Javakhq. In
the Khokhorian inscriptions of Argishti I (786-764 B.C.), among the
conquered lands of Diaukh or Daya (Tayq) and Tariun (Daruynq, Basen),
there is mention of Zabakhan. This name is also referred to in several
inscriptions left by a number of succeeding Urartian kings. Although,
there is no mention of Javakhq prior to the 8th century B.C., by
studying the pre-Urartian era, it is possible to presume that it had
either been an administrative part of an early Armenian state formation
of the 2nd millennia B.C.-in all likelihood of Hayasa or Etiuni-or it
may have been a fairly large, separate entity including the entire
western section of the province of Gugarq. The second hypothesis
is more probable; it is not by coincidence that the above-mentioned
Argishti inscription mentions Zabakha as an occupied country. It means
that until the beginning of the 8th century B.C., Javakhq had been
a self-governing nation at the time and, as a territory inhabited
by ethnic Armenians, was absorbed into the unified Kingdom of Van,
constituting its largest province on the north-western frontier.

There is almost no direct reference to Javakhq from the post-Urartian,
Armenian Ervanduni era. We can only cite two semi-legendary, yet
noteworthy, references from Moses of Khoren’s History of the Armenians
and Qartlis Tskhovreba. The father of historians notes that Vagharshak
I bequeathed "half of the Javakhs sector" to Gushar of the Sharas and
assigned a viceroy there to protect the Armenian homeland against the
north-Caucasian highlanders. Many scholars studying this venture of the
semi-legendary figure Vagharshak place it in the 3rd century B.C. At
that time, it seems, Javakhq was within the domains of the Ervandunis
and was given to Gushar, thus becoming identified with the latter; as
such, it ceased to be a vast province in its own right and was included
in the newly formed frontier principality as two split parts: Upper
Javakhq and Lower Javakhq. Upper Javakhq is identified with the "half
of the Javakhs sector" mentioned by Moses of Khoren, since it was given
to the Shirak province of the neighboring Shara. There are no sources
mentioning Lower Javakhq. But, if there was the upper segment-which
was the southern and northeastern highland-there must have also been a
"Lower Javakhq" encompassing the lowlands in the west and northwest.

It is significant that the above account by Moses of Khoren, written in
3rd-century B.C. (approximately) Javakhq, appears in its inaccurate,
"Georgian" version in Qartlis Tskhoveba, according to which-as
mentioned above-it was given to Javakhos. The fact is that in 270 B.C.,
adjacent to northern Metz Haiq, the Parnavazian state of the Georgians
(Iberia, Virq) had come into existence and, with the assistance
of the Seleucids-who were opposed to the Armenian Ervandunis-had
occupied and annexed the provinces of Gugarq and Javakhq, along
with other neighboring areas. At that time, the center of Javakhq
was the fortress of Tzunda, which the Armenians called Qajatun (City
of the Brave). The Greek writer Strabo describes the steps taken to
recover the territories listed above from the Georgians. He writes
that in the 2nd century B.C., King Artaxes of the Armenians (189-160)
had regained from the Iberians, among other lands, Gogarene (Gugarq)
and rejoined them to his country. The same statement, in different
words, is encountered also in Georgian sources. According to Leonti
Mroveli, in order to conquer Javakhetia, the Qartvelians (Georgians)
prompted the Osetians-the Alans, mentioned in Armenian annals-to
attack Artaxes. It means that the Armeno-Alan war, described by Moses
of Khoren in the well-known fable of "Artaxes and Satenik," was fought
also for Javakhq. Artaxes was not only able to re-conquer the Armenian
lands, but he also subjugated the small Georgian Kingdom. In fact,
the Georgian throne passed to the viceroy (Bdeshkh) of Gugarq. It is
not surprising, therefore, that in reference many future writers make
use of the title "Bdeshkh of Gugarians and Georgians."

Similarly, during the period of the Artaxiads and Arshakunis,
references to Javakhq are rare and it is basically through the
concept of the entire province of Gugarq that one can visualize the
region. The latter, until the downfall of the Arshakunis in 428 A.D.,
has remained the northern frontier province of Metz Haiq, and has not
been separated from it even in the first half of the first century
of our era (1-52 A.D.), when the Armenian throne was occupied by
foreigners, including Georgians.

>From the few references to the region in question, perhaps the most
valuable-a revealing observation on its demographic composition-belongs
to the pen of a Georgian historian. According to tradition, Nino
(Nune, of Armenian sources), one of the Hripsimean sisterhood of
Christian missionaries, on her way to Georgia from Armenia, finds
herself in Javakhq, where she meets Mskheti shepherds on the shores
of Lake Parvana and, speaking to them in Armenian, receives the right
directions to get to Mskhet. This testimony elucidates two important
issues. First, that Nune, a resident of Armenia until her passage to
Virq, was familiar with the native language and, along with other
missionaries, brought Christianity from Armenia to the land of the
Georgians. Second, that the language spoken in Javakhq was Armenian,
since it was populated with Armenians, otherwise there would have
been no necessity for shepherds from Mskhet to learn the language of
the Armenians.

During the reign of Arshak II (350-368 A.D.), Gugarq revolted and
pledged allegiance to the Georgian king. By the order of King Pap,
Sparapet (Supreme Commander) Mushegh re-conquered Gugarq and punished
the Bdeshkh and the princes who had helped him, re-establishing the
River Kur as the boundary between Armenia and Georgia: "…the old
boundary, which prevailed before between the land of the Armenians
and that of the Georgians, which is the great River Kur itself."

It is remarkable that, while being part of Gugarq, during the
3rd and 4th centuries, Javakhq managed to maintain its internal
autonomy. The princely clan of the Vardzavunis ruled there, and had
their special place in Arsacid (Arshakuni) Armenia. In the "Gahnamak"
(Register of Noble Clans), they occupied the 23rd place on a list of 70
"nakhararutiuns." During wartime, they contributed 200 warriors to the
eastern of the four command sectors. After the partition of Armenia in
the year 387 A.D., the influence of the Arsacids on Gugarq and Javakhq
was considerably weakened and, after the fall of the Armenian Kingdom,
the two regions were absorbed into the Georgian Satrapy set up under
the rule of Persia, at the same time that Artsakh was made part of
another Persian dominion, Aghvanq.

Along with all of northern Armenia, Javakhq also remained under
Persian rule until the Arab invasions of the 7th century. In History
of Taron, written by the contemporary author Hovhan Mamikonian, in
his narrative of the Arab conquests, once more we come across the name
of Javakhq. The author relates that the Arab general Abd el-Rahib had
sacked, in the mid-7th century, the Armenian provinces of Harq, Basen,
Javakhq, Vananda and, moving on to Virq, had returned to Arabia with
his loot. It is noteworthy, that Javakhq is listed with the Armenian
provinces, and Virq is mentioned only at the end. It signifies that
in the years 40-50 of the 7th century, during the period of the Arab
invasions, this province was part of Armenia, not Virq.

Javakhq remained under Arab domination until the end of the 9th
century, when Smbat I of the Bagratids (890-914 A.D.), according
to the historian Hovhannes of Draskhanakert, "…up and assailed
the province of the Gugars, subduing and conquering them for the
fortification of his own domain."

During the years 70-80 A.D., most of Gugarq formed part of the Kingdom
of Lori, or Kiurik (also Gugarq, Dzoraget). Upper Javakhq-particularly
Gogshen, its southern section-remained under the rule of the Bagratids
for a while, as, towards the end of the 10th century, Inner Javakhq
became a part of the increasingly more powerful Georgian Bagratids. By
the beginning of the 11th century, the same fate befell the heartland
of Upper Javakhq. In a short while, the Georgian kings turned Javakhq
and the neighboring Samtskhe into strong, fortified outposts of
their southern domains as a protection against separatist forces, the
Byzantine Empire and, later on, the Seljuk Turks. At the start of the
11th century, Bagrat III fortified one of the centers of the province
and called it New City, Akhalqalaq in Georgian (akhali meaning "new,"
qalaqi meaning "city"). In the years 1044-1047, in his war against
Liparit Orbelian, Bagrat IV built the Akhalklaq fort on the left bank
of the stream called Qarasunaghbiur. A certain number of Georgians
were brought here to populate the area.

Georgian hegemony did not last very long. In the year 1064, Armenia
and Georgia were devastated by the Seljuks. At that time, the Sultan
Alp Aslan "…set up camp in the province called Javalis (Javakhs),"
writes Matheos Urhayetsi, "and surrounding with arms the city called
Alakh (Akhal-qaghaq city), with a mighty assault captured Alakh city,
ruthlessly putting men and women, priests, clerics, and nobles to the
sword. He flooded the city with blood and took countless youngsters
and girls to Persia as slaves, and treasures of gold, silver, jewels,
and pearls beyond measure." Vardan the historian also narrates on these
events: The nephew of Tughril, Alp-Aslan "…returned with a force
of a hundred thousand and captured the new city that the Georgians
call Akhal-city (qaghaq)." It is obvious from these statements by
historians that by the middle of the 11th century, Akhalqalaq, which
had replaced Dzunda as regional center, had lost a sizable part of
its population to atrocious massacres and mass deportations.

At the beginning of the 12th century, King David the Builder of
Georgia (1089-1125) managed to regain Lori and Javakhq from the Seljuk
Turks. But, over the entire duration of the 11th century, Javakhq-along
with other provinces-continued to change hands. In August 1175, the
troops of Sultan-Atabek Eltkuz of Gandzak occupied and sacked Javakhq
and Treghq. Georgi III (1156-1184), avoiding a confrontation, showed no
opposition to the Seljuk aggression. After destroying Ani and Shirak,
Eltkuz "…totally devastates Akhal-qaghaq and Javakhet and then turns
towards Dvin…" Only towards the end of the 12th century-according
to Queen Tamar’s (1184-1213) historian-after the victorious campaigns
of Zachary and Ivane Zacharians, did the territories between Javakhq
and Sper fall under Georgian rule.

During this period, infiltrations of Qartvelian ethnic groups into
Javakhq continued along with the spread of Georgian Orthodoxy-a
process that was evident during the rise of the Bagratids of Georgia
(from the 12th to the beginning of the 13th century) not only in
Akhalqalaq but also other areas of northern Armenia which, as a result
of the growing Armeno-Georgian alliance, had been absorbed into the
boundaries of Georgia.

Nevertheless, of those provinces, Lori, Samtskhe-Akhaltskha,
Daush, areas around Sevan, as well as Javakhq remained essentially
Armenian-populated territories. It is not by chance that the Georgian
court trusted these provinces to the Armenian Zacharians who, under
the aegis of Georgia, created their own fiefdom.

http://www.hairenik.com/weekly/2009/08/