Turkey’s bid for entry could fuel debate for European Union

Turkey’s bid for entry could fuel debate for European Union

Catholic World News
Dec 16 2004

Dec. 16 (AsiaNews) – European leaders will decide tomorrow whether or
not to open talks with Turkey about that country’s bid to enter the
European Union. The European Parliament has passed– by a substantial
407 to 262 margin– a non-binding resolution approving the opening
of negotiations.

But Turkey’s bid for member is controversial, the AsiaNews service
observes. As Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip headed for Brussels
this week, he encapsulated the controversy in one public statement,
claiming that the European Union “has an obligation to prove that it
is not a Christian club” by accepting the Turkish bid.

Discussion of Turkey’s possible entry is likely to cause a serious of
potentially heated debates, beginning with the question of Europe’s
Christian identity. Other questions sure to be raised include
Turkey’s attitude toward the death penalty, the rights of ethnic and
religious minorities, and even the refusal of the Turkish government
to acknowledge the Armenian genocide of 1915.

The Complete Guide To The Biblical Lands

THE COMPLETE GUIDE TO THE BIBLICAL LANDS

The Independent – United Kingdom
Dec 11, 2004

David Orkin

THE GREATEST STORY EVER TOLD?

That’s for you to decide. But even though it’s 2,000 years since the
events described in the New Testament took place, many biblical
locations are still recognisable from the gospels of Matthew, Mark,
Luke and John.

WHERE EXACTLY ARE THE NEW TESTAMENT LANDS?

Joseph and Mary briefly travelled with the newborn Jesus to Egypt and
there are some other important sites in Syria and even Turkey:
Antalya, formerly Antioch, in the south-east of the country was second
only to Jerusalem as a centre of early Christianity. But if you
exclude churches built centuries after Christ’s death and the journeys
made by Paul (which took him to modern-day Cyprus, Turkey, Greece and
Italy), the vast majority of biblical sites fall within the
present-day borders of Jordan, and Israel and the Palestinian National
Authority (I&PA).

Jordan and the Palestinian Authority have seen many changes since
biblical times, and Israel’s urban areas are all totally
different. Intense building and farming have meant that vast tracts of
land have changed remarkably in a few decades, let alone in two
millennia. Parts of North Africa, for example, are much closer to how
the Holy Land would have looked in ancient times – Monty Python’s Life
of Brian was filmed in Tunisia.

Many Christians are disappointed that the very sites they consider so
important are marked by unsympathetic architecture and often ugly,
gaudy shrines. Exceptions include the Garden Tomb in Jerusalem and –
if they’re not too busy – some of the shady stream-side paths at
Bethany beyond the Jordan.

CAN I WALK IN JESUS’S FOOTSTEPS?

Yes, and see some sublime landscapes along the way. For example, the
Mount of the Beatitudes (where Jesus delivered the Sermon on the
Mount) has peaceful well-tended gardens that overlook the Sea of
Galilee. When Jesus walked between Jerusalem and Jericho, it is likely
that he took the path through Wadi Kelt. Though the monastery of St
George here dates from the 5th century, this valley has a strong
biblical feel and is thought to be the location for the parable of the
Good Samaritan.

In Jordan there are many wilderness areas and unspoilt places of
natural beauty that are likely to invoke spiritual feelings: however
awe-inspiring such magnificent areas as Wadi Rum may be, no
substantial evidence has yet been found to tie them in with specific
New Testament sites.

DID JESUS SPEND MUCH TIME IN JORDAN?

Yes. Christ often crossed the River Jordan from Galilee, Samaria and
Judea into Perea, a region of present-day western Jordan roughly
bordered by Pella in the north and Mukawir in the south. Jordan got a
big boost as a destination for New Testament travel as a result of a
papal visit in 2000. But most of the biblical action took place in
present-day I&PA, and in particular Jerusalem – possibly the most
significant city in the world.

WHY IS JERUSALEM SO IMPORTANT?

Because the city is at or near the heart of three of the world’s great
monotheistic religions. A settlement existed here at least 4,000 years
ago (incidentally, Jericho, 15 miles to the east, has been dated back
to at least 7000BC) and its recorded history began about 1,000 years
before Christ’s birth, when the Jewish King David captured the city
from the Jebusites. To establish it as the Jews’ holy city, David’s
son Solomon built the First Temple on the site where God instructed
Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac. The building was finally completed
in 950BC.

In 586BC Jerusalem fell to the Babylonians but they in turn were
driven out by the Persians 49 years later. The Jews (they didn’t
officially become Israelis until the State of Israel was established
in 1948) built the Second Temple on the site of the first in
515BC. The famous Wailing Wall is the western wall from the Second
Temple.

Alexander the Great conquered the city in 331BC and it was then ruled
by the Seleucids – Syrian Greeks. Pompey’s armies captured Jerusalem
for the Romans, and Herod the Great was installed as king. After his
death, the Romans decided to use procurators to rule rather than
kings. The fifth procurator was in power from AD26-36: his name was
Pontius Pilate.

O LITTLE TOWN OF BETHLEHEM…

…is eight miles south of Jerusalem. The Church of the Nativity here
was rebuilt in AD529, after the original edifice was damaged. A silver
star, held by the Catholic Church to be the exact spot of Christ’s
birth, was set into the floor in 1717. Midnight Mass from nearby St
Catherine’s Church is broadcast worldwide on Christmas Eve, when
Bethlehem’s Manger Square is packed with thousands of Christians.

AND NAZARETH?

Today the place where Jesus grew up is the largest Arab town in
I&PA. Its present location is thought to be a little to the west of
the town where Jesus spent his early years. The major building here is
the Basilica of the Annunciation, which was completed in 1969; it
opens from 9-11.45am and 2-4.30pm daily (not Sunday mornings), and
admission is free. Many visitors feel the simpler, quieter Greek
Orthodox Church of St Gabriel is more in keeping with reflection and
prayer.

The Mensa Christi church was built in 1861 around a stone identified
by 17th-century pilgrims as the table Jesus set for his disciples
after the Resurrection. It reopened a few years ago following
extensive restoration works that had taken over 30 years to complete.

Nazareth has several other interesting churches but many visitors
prefer to base themselves on the shore of the Sea of Galilee in
Tiberias when touring the nearby sites which include Capernaum, Cana,
Taghba (where the 5,000 were fed), and Mount Tabor – the Mount of the
Transfiguration.

AFTER CHRIST’S LIFE?

The Jews did not keep their peace when the Greeks tried to rededicate
the temple (the Jews’ holiest building) to the Greek god Zeus in
168BC. When the Roman Emperor Caligula insisted that his image be
installed in their temple, the uprising that followed ended only after
a long siege in AD70. As punishment, the Romans destroyed the temple,
and most Jews were exiled abroad or sold into slavery. Despite these
actions, still fearing (quite rightly) that Jerusalem would still be
seen as a focus for Jewish nationalism, the Romans decided to destroy
the whole city. A few decades after the Crucifixion, Emperor Hadrian
built a new Roman city on the site and named it Aelia Capitolina. In
AD1099 crusaders broke through Jerusalem’s defences and – in the name
of Christianity – massacred some 40,000 Muslims and Jews. With the
occasional lull, destruction and bloodshed have continued through to
the present day: sadly peace and tolerance are not the first words one
thinks of to describe the Eternal City.

AND JERUSALEM TODAY?

Jerusalem’s Old City overflows with important New Testament sites and
is now divided on geo-religious grounds between Christians, Jews,
Arabs and Armenians; Armenia was the first nation to be converted
almost en masse to Christianity. The layout of the current Old City is
roughly as it was in the Roman-built Aelia Capitolina, though there is
probably at least 20 feet of mud, earth and archaeology between the
current streets and their level during Jesus’s time. The city walls
in existence today were in fact built by Suleiman the Magnificent in
the 16th century when the Ottomans ruled the city.

The question of who should control Jerusalem is still at the root of
many of the problems in the Middle East, and it’s incredible to think
that it is all packed into an area of less than a square mile. Outside
the walls but within the present-day metropolitan area is the Mount of
Olives, which provides one of the world’s great city views. On the
other side of the mountain is Bethany, the home of Lazarus – hence its
Arabic name, El-Azariyah.

A Franciscan church commemorates Lazarus’s resurrection, while
Bethpage has a village church with a mural depicting Jesus mounting a
donkey for his entry to Jerusalem.

Though biblical rather

than specifically New Testament, two sights that might be of interest
are the Bible Lands Museum, part of the highly-regarded Israel Museum
(00 972 2 561 1066; ) and the Biblical Gardens in
Ein-Kerem (00 972 2643 0196; ).

WHAT’S THE ISLAMIC CONNECTION?

Muslims considered Jerusalem such a holy city that the earliest
mosques had two mihrabs or prayer niches: one facing Mecca and the
other pointing towards Jerusalem.

Islam has its roots in both Judaism and Christianity. Throughout the
Old Testament era there were prophets, and Muslims believe that Jesus
was one of these. However, Islam is based on the belief that Mohammed,
who lived in the early 7th century, was the last, and greatest, of the
prophets.

On the evening of his death – which occurred in AD632 in Medina in
modern- day Saudi Arabia – the Prophet Mohammed in the company of the
angel Gabriel made a journey to Jerusalem. This is known as Al-Isra Wa
Al Mi’Raj. In the presence of Allah, Mohammed then ascended to heaven
from a place within the walls of the city. Some time later, a caliph
(Islamic ruler) identified an area on the same site as the two
destroyed Jewish temples as the location from which Mohammed had
departed.

In AD691, the Dome of the Rock mosque was built on this site. It is
now contained in the Haram El Sharif compound. For 36 shekels (pounds
4.50) visitors can buy a combined ticket to the Dome of the Rock, Al
Aqsa mosque and the Islamic Museum. The Dome of the Rock opens
7.30-10.30am and 12.30- 1.30pm from Sunday-Thursday, but is closed
during all prayer times and in the afternoons during Ramadan, and on
Muslim holidays. It may also be closed during periods of tension.

IS JORDAN CALMER?

Jordan has many sites connected to early Christianity. Specifically in
terms of New Testament events, you can visit Umm Qais in the far
north- west – one of the cities of the Decapolis. These days no
Gadarene swine wander the Roman and Byzantine ruins or soak up the
magnificent views over the southern part of the Sea of Galilee. Close
to the Dead Sea, Herod Antipas’s hilltop fort of Machaerus (Mukawir)
is where Salome danced and won John the Baptist’s head. It is said
that Jesus, Mary and various disciples passed through the town of
Anjara and rested in a cave (site of the present day church of Our
Lady of the Mountain).

Petra, the most famous archaeological site in Jordan that was hewn
from the rock by the Nabataeans, is thought by many to be the last
staging post of the three kings en route to Bethlehem with their cargo
of myrrh, frankincense and gold.

A very important New Testament site can be found on the banks of the
river Jordan a few kilometres north of the Dead Sea. It was only a few
years ago that this was declared to be Bethany beyond the Jordan,
where John the Baptist lived and preached, and where Christ was not
only baptised but launched his public ministry. The large site also
includes the hill from which Elijah ascended to heaven. Both Mukawir,
Anjara and Bethany beyond the Jordan were declared pilgrimage sites by
the Pope on his visit. Many Israelis continue to claim that the
correct site is at Qasr Al-Yahud on the I&PA side of the river.

ARE BIBLICAL LOCATIONS ACCURATELY PRESENTED TODAY?

The short answer is probably not. It wasn’t until AD330 that
Constantine was inaugurated as the first Christian Emperor of the
newly decreed Holy Roman (or Byzantine) Empire and attempts were made
to recognise and mark the locations of the important events described
in the New Testament. Constantine’s mother, Helena, initiated a wave
of “holy building”: among the churches and shrines constructed at this
time were Jerusalem’s Church of the Holy Sepulchre and the Church of
the Nativity in Bethlehem. Some sites match New Testament geographical
descriptions closely, and at some archaeological evidence suggests
veracity. At others the physical environment would have changed
beyond recognition in those 300-plus years.

There are two examples from recent times that help us to understand
the problem of identification. In 1986, after a prolonged dry spell,
the waters of the Sea of Galilee fell to their lowest level since
records began. The remains of a wooden boat were discovered in the
shallows, and as excitement mounted, archaeologists moved in. Despite
the fact that it was the first ancient ship ever found at the Sea of
Galilee and that the scientists could not say much more than that it
was from the period between 100BC and AD100, claims went out that this
was the very fishing boat that Christ himself sailed in.

What is certain is that for nearly 1,700 years, millions of Christians
have been visiting these sites to pray: that alone establishes strong
Christian spiritual and religious significance and Jordan has now been
endorsed by the Pope as an important pilgrimage destination.

WHEN SHOULD I VISIT THE REGION?

Parts of Jordan and Jerusalem can get cold and wet in winter
(occasional snow is not unknown). Due to Israel’s size and varied
landscape, winter visitors may be able to ski on the slopes of Mount
Hermon in the north and snorkel in the Red Sea just a few hours’ drive
to the south.

Easter is also busy (often coinciding with the Jewish holiday of
Passover). Sightseeing can be uncomfortable on hot summer days (when
nights can still be cold), but even so the school summer holidays
usually mean more visitors, resulting in higher prices for both
flights and hotels.

In climate terms, the best times to visit are April/May and
September/October. But bring along the right wardrobe and you can
comfortably visit at any time of the year.

ISN’T IT DANGEROUS?

The Foreign Office certainly urges caution. Its advice to travellers
to Israel reads: “There is a high threat from Palestinian terrorism in
Israel. We strongly advise you to maintain a high level of vigilance,
especially in public places, including bars and restaurants, and avoid
public transport, and any political gatherings and/or demonstrations.”

WHAT’S THE BEST WAY TO VISIT?

For those who prefer things to be organised for them or who want to
travel with like-minded people, various companies offer tours that
specifically concentrate on the New Testament sites. These are often
run by church groups such as Pilgrim Travel (01304 375345;
), a firm that offers tours to both Israel
and Jordan, and Camino Journeys (01843 863904;
) which can organise New Testament tours around
the sites in Jordan.

IS IT POSSIBLE TO TRAVEL INDEPENDENTLY?

Doing things independently requires a lot more planning, but there are
plenty of flights to Tel Aviv, Amman in Jordan, and to the
neighbouring Red Sea resorts of Eilat (Israel) and Aqaba (Jordan).

El Al (020-7957 4100; ), British Airways (0870 850 9850;
) and Royal Jordanian (020-7878 6300; ) all
fly to the area from the UK, and connections via European cities are
widely available.

El Al does not operate on the Sabbath, between dusk on Friday and dusk
on Saturday local time.

HOW SHOULD I GET AROUND?

Though in New Testament times your choices would have been foot,
donkey, or boat, Israel now has one of the world’s biggest bus
companies, Egged. In addition, key routes have shared taxi (sherut)
services that leave when all seats are full. You may choose to fly
between Tel Aviv and Amman (25 minutes) as the three border crossings
between I&PA and Jordan (Allenby/King Hussein Bridge near Jericho,
Arava just north of Eilat, and the Sheikh Hussein bridge near
Tiberias) can be problematic.

I haven’t come across anyone offering donkey rides these days,
although at the viewpoint on the Mount of Olives there are usually a
few camels whose owners will allow you a quick ride for a handful of
shekels.

Getting around the Palestinian Authority is best done in yellow
taxis. In I& PA, car hire isn’t cheap but distances are relatively
short and roads are good. You can’t take rental cars into Jordan, and
you should always be careful not to stray into risky areas.

In Jordan, the main sites tend to be less accessible by public
transport and a tour is a good option, especially as tour companies
also benefit from lower accommodation rates.

HOW DO I GET MORE INFORMATION?

Several guidebooks focus on the Holy Land: try to choose one that has
been updated or published as recently as possible. Alternatively, try
the Israel Government Tourist Office (020-7299 1111;
), the website and the Jordan
Tourist Board on (020- 7371 6496; ).

NO ENTRY

Though the list is a lot shorter than it was, some hard-line Islamic
countries may refuse you admission if your passport has stamps from a
previous visit to Israel. In case you might be considering a visit to
one of these countries (such as Syria), on arrival in Israel before
you hand over your passport for inspection ask the officer to put the
entry stamp on a separate piece of paper. This is common practice –
but it may not work if you’re visiting Jordan or Egypt from Israel,
and it is possible that merely asking for this courtesy could
intensify the security check.

Entering Israel after visiting hard-line Islamic countries is less of
a problem, though a passport full of visas from countries openly
hostile to Israel will mean extra attention at security checks.

Jerusalem and other places in Israel and the Palestinian Territory
frequently make the news for the wrong reasons. Throughout the region
you will see a lot of people carrying guns: soldiers (on and off
duty), police, guards.

Security checks on flights to and from Israel, especially on El Al,
are lengthy and thorough.

Expect numerous military checkpoints on roads linking Israel with the
Palestinian Authority, and access between the two may be restricted at
short notice.

www.blmj.org
www.biblicalresources.net
www.pilgrimtraveluk.ltd.uk
www.camino-journeys.net
www.elal.co.uk
www.ba.com
www.rja.com.jo
www.go-israel.org
www.visit-palestine.com
www.see-jordan.com

BAKU: Azerbaijan, US military cooperation discussed

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
Dec 10 2004

AZERBAIJAN, U.S. MILITARY COOPERATION DISCUSSED
[December 10, 2004, 11:47:51]

As informed in AzerTAj from the press-service of the Ministry of
Defence, on December 9, Minister of Defence of the Azerbaijan
Republic colonel-general Safar Abiyev met the delegation headed by
the assistant of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense on the
International Security Affairs of the United States James McDougal.
Colonel-general Safar Abiyev said that President Ilham Aliyev highly
estimates co-operation with the United States of America in the field
of defense, and the Azerbaijan party is satisfied with continuation
of discussions in the given sphere. We are interested in development
of co-operation from the NATO within the framework of the program ”
Partnership in the name of the Peace”. This year the President of
Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev has presented the secretary general of the
NATO the Plan of activity on individual co-operation. Working on this
plan, we carry out his positions. We trust, that our co-operation
from the USA and the NATO will be expand henceforth’.

Both sides have discussed various issues of co-operation between the
Azerbaijan Republic and the USA in the field of defense and have
expressed confidence that shortly this co-operation will reach the
highest level. James McDougal has told: ” Since 2002 of the attitude
between the USA and Azerbaijan in military sphere have considerably
become stronger. And we shall not stop at a present level “.

Minister of Defence, colonel-general Safar Abiyev has noted that the
U.S. administration always supported Azerbaijan. However we are
surprised with the actions undertaken by the Congress of the USA in a
question of settlement of the Armenian-Azerbaijan conflict. While
occupation of the Azerbaijan lands by Armenia is the indisputable
fact, some congressmen take steps in support of the aggression fact.
Annually achieving granting of Armenia the help in millions dollars,
such congressmen thus render to separative regime of Nagorno-Karabakh
political and material support. Colonel-general Safar Abiyev said
that despite of all this, Azerbaijan perceives and will perceive
henceforth the USA as the ally. Therefore Azerbaijan waits for
all-round aid from the United States.

OSCE envoy praises Armenia’s democratic record, says much to be done

OSCE envoy praises Armenia’s democratic record, says much to be done

Arminfo
10 Dec 04

YEREVAN

Armenia did quite well last year in strengthening democratic values,
the head of the OSCE mission in Yerevan, Vladimir Pryakhin, told a
round table at the Yerevan hotel today devoted to reforming Armenia’s
Electoral Code. The round table was organized by the public
organization Partnership For Open Society.

Vladimir Pryakhin said last year’s democratic achievements included
the modernization of the Criminal and Electoral codes, the launch of
the ombudsman’s activities, the court verdict for the person who
inflicted bodily injury to a journalist, etc. But he warned that there
was no room for complacency and that much remains to be done. The
priority task is to continue reforming the Electoral Code. The OSCE
mission is ready to support Armenia on this, but is also counting on
the assistance of the Armenian mass media and civil society, Pryakhin
said.

Continuing the theme of reforming Armenia’s Electoral Code, he said
the right to elect members of parliament or president is one of the
most important international democratic principles. The efforts of
those involved in the process of transformation are focused on local
government elections due in 2005. Particular attention in the reform
is being paid to the principles of forming electoral commissions and
their technical capacities to ensure a prompt and effective vote
count, Pryakhin said.

Touching on the reform of the Armenian Constitution, the head of the
OSCE mission said amendments to the constitution should reflect the
present-day realities.

Deputy speaker says Russia impeding Armenia’s independent foreignpol

Deputy speaker says Russia impeding Armenia’s independent foreign policy

Noyan Tapan news agency
8 Dec 04

Yerevan, 8 December: The recent meeting of the Armenian-Russian
commission on interparliamentary cooperation held in Moscow discussed,
among other issues, the possible deployment of an Armenian military
contingent in Iraq. The deputy speaker of the Armenian National
Assembly and co-chairman of the Armenian-Russian interparliamentary
commission, Vaan Ovanesyan, said that the Russian side voiced its
concern over such a prospect.

The Armenian delegation, in turn, asked whether the fact that Russia
has written off Iraq’s multi-billion debt to Russia meant economic
support for the government of this country installed by the “occupier”,
the United States. Vaan Ovanesyan stressed that at the same time,
Russia has not cancelled Armenia’s much smaller debt.

“We told our Russian counterparts that their conduct in the
international arena does not encourage free and independent
decision-making on the part of Armenia,” he said.

The deputy speaker said the Russian side had displayed certain
“jealousy” over Armenia’s relations with NATO.

“We made it clear to our counterparts that this is one of the
directions in our independent foreign policy and we have no intention
of backing down on it,” he said. At the same time, the head of the
delegation noted that an agreement had been reached with the Russian
side to conduct preliminary interparliamentary consultations on
NATO-related issues.

Presidential Press Service Doesn’t Comment On Rumours That RAPreside

PRESIDENTIAL PRESS SERVICE DOESN’T COMMENT ON RUMOURS THAT RA PRESIDENT
SUBMITS PACKAGE OF PROPOSALS ON KARABAKH SETTLEMENT

YEREVAN, December 7 (Noyan Tapan). “Senseless suppositions aren’t
subject to commentary,” Ashot Kocharian, Spokesman of RA President,
declared answering Noyan Tapan’s question, what package of proposals on
Nagorno Karabakh settlement RA President Robert Kocharian submitted to
OSCE Minsk Group. To recap, on December 7, Haykakan Zhamanak newspaper
referring to its “diplomatic sources” published an information,
according to which 2 new packages of settlement of Nagorno Karabakh
conflict were discussed during the Sofia meeting of Armenian and Azeri
Foreign Ministers with Co-chairmen of OSCE Minsk Group. The packages
were submitted by the Co-chairmen of Minsk Group and RA President,
respectively.

BAKU: Azeri parliament to send factfinding mission to Georgia – spea

Azeri parliament to send factfinding mission to Georgia – speaker

Trend news agency
7 Dec 04

Baku, 7 December: Let the Georgian administration know that its incomes
as a sovereign state will depend on the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) and
the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum oil and gas pipeline projects, Azerbaijani
Parliament Speaker Murtuz Alasgarov said in parliament today.

“Let them know that Azerbaijan has always maintained friendly relations
with Georgia and we are still in favour of that. There are up to
500,000 ethnic Azerbaijanis living in Georgia. And Azerbaijanis will
live in this land,” the speaker said.

Alasgarov added that not a single ethnic Azerbaijani is currently
involved in the construction of BTC on the territory of Georgia and
no-one has received a plot of land, while ethnic Armenians have
received theirs. This issue perturbs the Azerbaijani side a lot,
the speaker added. He said a Milli Maclis [Azerbaijani parliament]
commission of four MPs would be set up to investigate the developments
unfolding in Georgia. The commission will be sent to Georgia on a
factfinding mission and prepare a report for the Milli Maclis. The
report will also be submitted to the presidents of the two countries.

It must be remembered that a woman was killed and several people
received various severe wounds as a result of an armed conflict
in the village of Asagi Guslar in Georgia’s Marneuli District last
week. The incident occurred between employees of a local stud farm
and ethnic Azerbaijanis who were protesting against the use of land
by the horse breeding factory. The Georgian Ministry of Internal
Affairs has instituted criminal proceedings into the incident.

Year Of Armenian Culture and Art In France

YEAR OF ARMENIAN CULTURE AND ART IN FRANCE

Azg/arm
7 Dec 04

The year of 2005 is declared to be a year of Armenian culture and
art in France. Armenian writers, musicians and artists all over the
world will gather in the “center of the world”.

Henrik Igitian, president of Children’s Aesthetic Center, who left
for Paris on December 1 to carry out preliminary works, said on this
occasion: “Our cruel history taught us the art of hardship. Our life
was never easy one. Even if there were no external barriers we created
our own ones. The history spread Armenians all over the world, but
I am sure that we should overcome the terms of “Armenia’s
culture” and “Diaspora’s culture”.

The State Gallery and Matenadaran, depository of ancient Armenian
manuscripts, are also invited to participate at the program. Henrik
Igitian was surprised not the see the Museum of Armenian History
and the Aesthetic Center included in the list of delegations leaving
for France.

By Sergey Galoyan

Too close for comfort

The Australian, Australia
Dec 4 2004

Too close for comfort

Peter Wilson in Kiev
December 04, 2004

IT was not what you would call a great public relations coup. Leonid
Kuchma, the former manager of a Soviet missile factory, who has been
one of Russia’s most loyal allies during his decade as President of
Ukraine, flew from the political crisis in his country early
yesterday to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin at an airport near
Moscow, in what looked like an anxious visit to report to head office
for new instructions.

The Russians have loomed as the shadowy but ominous presence behind
Kuchma’s regime during the past two weeks of confrontation on the
streets of Kiev and other Ukrainian cities, with housewives,
shop-owners and young anti-government activists all convinced that
Russian special forces were already hiding in the city, or would soon
appear if Kuchma’s regime began to fall.

But as the orange-clad protesters continued to rally in the streets,
dancing to rock music as they celebrated the momentum of their
campaign for fair elections, Kuchma decided he needed to huddle with
Putin even if the television broadcasts of their meeting cast him as
Moscow’s puppet.

Opposition leader Viktor Yushchenko rubbed in the humiliating fact
that Kuchma could get an audience with Putin easier than he could get
into his own office – which has been blockaded by opposition
activists. “The source of power is located in Ukraine – it’s the
Ukrainian people”, not the Kremlin, chided Yushchenko.

The visit reminded Ukrainians that while the anti-government campaign
has mainly been a backlash against domestic corruption and economic
mismanagement, it has also become a new fault line in East-West
relations and will determine whether their 48 million-strong nation
will look more to the West in the future or drift into a closer
embrace of Russia.

The worried look on Putin’s face as he commiserated with Kuchma about
the precarious situation in Ukraine testified that the unprecedented
dispute there is also a turning point for Russia and his own
international ambitions.

Putin has reason to be worried. He has been embarrassed at home and
abroad after rushing to congratulate Kuchma’s hand-picked successor,
Viktor Yanukovych, for “winning” an election that has been declared
rigged by observers, Western governments, Ukraine’s parliament and
many of the Government’s own backers.

Putin now has the potential discomfort of having a real democracy on
his doorstep as an uncomfortably relevant example of the sort of
civil rights that his citizens are losing as he strengthens his
already tight hold on Russia’s media, business, political parties and
regional governments.

Growing in confidence at home and abroad, Putin has openly mourned
the passing of the Soviet Union 13 years ago as “a national tragedy”
for Russia and launched a new bid to reconstitute a “joint economic
space” on the ashes of the USSR, taking in Russia, Ukraine,
Kazahkstan and Belarus.

He has already interfered in Georgia and Moldova by supporting
ethnically Russian separatist movements, has smiled on rigged
elections in Belarus, Azerbaijan and Armenia, and has reasserted
Moscow’s role in Central Asia’s Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and
Uzbekistan, where there is solid evidence the Government has boiled
at least one dissident alive.

But of all the countries in Russia’s “near abroad”, Ukraine is easily
the most important. It is the largest, having taken one-fifth of the
USSR’s population when it declared independence in 1991. It has the
best farmland in Europe, it is a vital transit point for the
pipelines that supply one-third of the European Union’s oil and gas
imports, and culturally it is more Russian than any of Moscow’s
neighbours. In fact Ukraine is the cradle of Russia’s Orthodox Church
and Slavic culture.

Soviet leaders Leonid Brezhnev and Nikita Krushchev were Ukrainians,
and Ukraine built the nation’s heavy industries, staffed largely by
Russians. Even today, manufacturing production lines straddle their
border, as do thousands of extended families. The family ties are so
strong that Ukraine surrendered its nuclear weapons to Russia after
independence and allows Russia’s Black Sea fleet into its port of
Sevastopol.

Russian is still the language that most Ukrainians speak at home, and
if Yanukovych had become president he would have made it the second
official language and introduced dual citizenship for millions, while
rejecting Opposition calls for EU and NATO membership.

“We have been brothers and cousins for three centuries,” says Alla
Sokolovskaya, a 30-year-old teacher from Kiev with a Russian mother
and Ukrainian father.

“We are one. Putin supports us because we are all Slavs, and we have
to stand together against NATO, which looks more and more
aggressive,” she says as she stands in the snow at a pro-Yanukovych
rally drowned out by the Yushchenko protests that crippled the
capital.

Until now, western Europe and the US have accepted Russia’s role in
Ukraine. The EU has never offered it membership, even though Ukraine
is plainly more European than long-term aspirant Turkey.

In 1991 US president George Herbert Bush visited Kiev and tried to
persuade its leaders not to seek independence from the Soviet Union,
in what was derided as his “Chicken Kiev” speech.

One of the main drafters of that speech was a little-known expert on
Soviet affairs named Condoleezza Rice, but as GeorgeW. Bush’s next
secretary of state, she is sure to take a rather different attitude
on the need to maintain Ukrainian independence.

It is not surprising that Russian leaders have been so sensitive
about the sophisticated and well-funded US campaign of recent years
to fund and train democracy activists prepared to take on
authoritarian regimes in elections across eastern Europe.

It is certainly not paranoia when the Russians claim Washington has
been funding activists and election campaigns against Moscow’s
friends in places such as Serbia, Georgia, Belarus and Ukraine.

Direct US funding of pro-Yushchenko campaigners is estimated to be
more than $US10million ($12.9 million), and more money and skills
have been provided by democracy foundations run by the main US
political parties and donors such as billionaire George Soros.

In one of their most provocative moves, the US and other Western
embassies bankrolled the exit polls that provided a standard to judge
the officially declared results.

Putin was more open in his support for Yanukovych, twice visiting to
campaign for him and sending his chief spin doctor to work in Kiev,
where Yushchenko, whose American wife Katherine used to work for the
State Department, was portrayed as a US puppet.

The truth is that although Yushchenko is a pro-Western liberal
economist and reformer, he has more in common with his rival than it
appears. He served for two years in the job Yanukovych now holds,
prime minister under Kuchma, before breaking away to oppose him. He
is known as an opponent of corruption but, like Yanukovych, he has
his own tight circle of wealthy business backers.

There is little doubt the Government and its business allies, who
have grown rich on the privatisation of state assets, stuffed ballot
boxes, abused their control of most TV stations and even put
invisible ink in pens used to mark ballots in some Opposition areas.
Few observers doubt that Yushchenko would have won a fair vote.

But while international attention has focused on the dubious turnout
of 97 per cent in Yanukovych’s home region, Russian-speaking Donetsk,
where many booths somehow registered turnouts of more than 100 per
cent, the rorts were not all one way.

Yanukovych’s implausible 96 per cent of the vote in Donetsk was
almost matched in some regions in the west of the country by supposed
votes of up to 94 per cent for his opponent.

The explosive threat by the leaders of some Russian-speaking regions
to break away from the nation if Yanukovych was not installed as
president was backed by Moscow mayor Yuri Luzkhov, who attended a
meeting of eastern Ukrainian leaders and denounced the Opposition as
a “sabbath of witches” pretending to “represent the whole of the
nation”.

That separatist threat soon melted in the face of a nationalist
backlash across Ukraine and because of the realisation by the tycoons
close to Kuchma, whose fortunes are largely based in the east, that
it would not help their businesses if a reconstituted Iron Curtain
was placed through the centre of Ukraine rather than the middle of
Germany.

Neither side went into the election campaign wanting to turn totally
away from either Russia or the West, and the conflict in Iraq shows
the complexity of the diplomatic balancing act that Ukraine has at
times achieved.

It was the usually pro-Moscow Kuchma who sent a solid contingent of
troops to Iraq to improve his standing in Washington, with his
protege Yanukovych vowing to extend their tour of duty while
Yushchenko has promised to pull them out.

The danger for Putin is that his high-profile and apparently
unsuccessful intervention in Ukraine’s political problems may have
tipped its balance of opinion much further towards the West,
especially if Yushchenko emerges as president – a prospect that is
not yet guaranteed, but is increasingly likely.

Trade, tanker-jams, Chechnya on agenda in Putin’s Turkey visit

Associated Press Worldstream
December 1, 2004 Wednesday 11:18 AM Eastern Time

Trade, tanker-jams, Chechnya on agenda in Putin’s Turkey visit

ALEX NICHOLSON; Associated Press Writer

MOSCOW

Trade, tanker-jams in the Bosporus Strait and the thorny subject of
conflict in Chechnya are expected to dominate talks when Russian
President Vladimir Putin makes a state visit to Turkey on Sunday –
the first by a Russian leader since the Soviet collapse.

The two-day visit had been slated for September, but was postponed
when Chechen and other rebels seized a school in southern Russia in
an attack that ended with more than 330 people dead, mostly children.

Putin is to meet with Turkish President Ahmet Necdet Sezer and Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Turkey and Russia have been rivals for centuries, competing for
influence in Central Asia, the Caucasus and the Balkans. That
competition increased after the fall of the Soviet Union and the
independence of Turkic states in Central Asia and the Caucasus.

But recently, rivalries have subsided and the two countries have been
concentrating on trade.

Bilateral trade is expected to exceed US$10 billion ([euro]7.5
billion) this year, Russia’s Industry and Energy Minister Viktor
Khristenko said recently. He said that tourism, construction and
commerce by small-time “shuttle traders” who buy Turkish goods for
sale in Russia boosts trade volume to more than US$15 billion
([euro]11 billion).

Turkish companies are active in Russia in retail, construction and
brewing, and investment to date totals US$2 billion ([euro]1.5
billion), Khristenko said.

Energy issues are likely to play a major role in the talks. In an
interview with CNN-Turk television in September, Putin said that his
country, which already provides some 60 percent of Turkey’s natural
gas imports, was considering selling oil to Turkey and exporting fuel
to other countries via Turkey.

Turkey is expected to push Russia to commit to a costly
Turkish-proposed Trans-Thracian pipeline that would run from the
Black Sea to the Aegean. Turkish officials warn that traffic in the
narrow, 21-mile Bosporus has soared by some 30 percent in the past
two years — and that it can’t handle more Russian oil tankers.

Much of the increased traffic is from Russia’s Black Sea port of
Novorossiisk, and exports to the Black Sea via the Caspian pipeline
from Kazakhstan are only set to grow.

Putin and Erdogan are also expected to discuss contentious issues
such as the Caucasus, where Turkey is allied with Azerbaijan and
Russia is friendly with its rival, Armenia.

There could also be tension over Chechnya. Turks sympathize with
their fellow Muslims in the war-ravaged Russian region, and many
Turks trace their ancestry to the Caucasus. Russia has called on
Turkey to crack down on Turkish charities that it claims are doing
too little to stop funds, weapons and new cadres from reaching terrorists.