Armenia says ready to deepen relations with NATO

ITAR-TASS News Agency
TASS
November 5, 2004 Friday

Armenia says ready to deepen relations with NATO

By Tigran Liloyan

YEREVAN

Armenia is ready to deepen relationship with NATO, President Robert
Kocharian said here Friday as he received visiting NATO Secretary
General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer.

Kocharian made known his personal conviction that the visit would be
useful for future cooperation, the presidential press said.

Armenia recently broadened the format of contacts with NATO, he said,
adding: “We already have an envoy to the alliance and are seeking a
greater role in a range of its programs”.

De Hoop Scheffer said NATO had positive relations with Armenia and
stressed the importance of this country’s participation in certain
programs.

Kocharian also presented Armenia’s angle of view at the prospects of
settling the dragged-out conflict in Nagorny Karabakh, a region of
Azerbaijan with a predominantly Armenian population where tensions have
persisted since 1987.

ANKARA: German Greens Leader Visits Istanbul

Milliyet, Turkey
Nov. 4, 2004

GERMAN GREENS LEADER VISITS ISTANBUL

Germany’s visiting Greens Group leader Claudia Roth accompanied by a
delegation yesterday held contacts in Istanbul. Roth visited the
Armenian and Fener Greek Patriarchates. Speaking to reporters at the
German Consulate, Roth said that she was holding a series of meetings
with Turkish officials to see how the nation’s reforms were being
implemented, adding that there were certain shortcomings. The Greens
leader then traveled to Diyarbakir in the late afternoon. /Milliyet/

BAKU: KLO pickets parliament over Armenian presence at NATO seminar

Azeri pressure group pickets parliament over Armenian presence at NATO
seminar

ANS TV, Baku
4 Nov 04

[Presenter] Taking an opportunity of NATO Secretary-General Jaap de
Hoop Scheffer’s visit [to Azerbaijan], members of the Karabakh
Liberation Organization KLO] have protested against the participation
of Armenian MPs in the 58th Rose-Roth seminar of the NATO
Parliamentary Assembly due in Baku on 26-28 November. The KLO members
staged a picket outside the Milli Maclis [Azerbaijani parliament].

[Correspondent, over video of protesters outside parliament] The KLO
members expressed their protest at the participation of the Armenian
MPs in the NATO Parliamentary Assembly’s Rose-Roth seminar in Baku in
a more original way. Since law-enforcement bodies did not know that
members of the organization would picket the Milli Maclis, nobody
interfered in the protest. First, the protesters scattered leaflets
with various slogans outside the parliament building. The following
slogans were on these leaflets: “We are calling on the Azerbaijani
people to more actively protest against the visit of Armenian
representatives to Baku”, “Down with Armenian criminals”, “Yes to NATO
without aggressor Armenia”, “No to NATO protecting Armenia” etc.

The KLO members did not meet any obstacle till the door of the Milli
Maclis. The KLO first deputy chairman, first-grade Karabakh disabled
Firudin Mammadov, made an address.

[Firudin Mammadov, captioned] We do not have anything against
Azerbaijan’s relations with NATO. But NATO and all world organizations
should know that the Azerbaijani people and state have principles, and
Azerbaijan’s lands have been occupied by Armenia. And we are against
that occupation. We do not have any other principles.

[Correspondent] The pickets chanted other slogans too.

[Pickets shown waving their arms and chanting “Either Karabakh or
death, either Karabakh or death”].

[Correspondent] Although several policemen standing aside did not
interfere, top guards arrived and started dispersing the pickets after
the resolution was read out. But no particular violence was allowed
and nobody was detained. The detention of the protesters started only
after the delayed arrival of the employees of the Sabayil district
police department [in Baku]. When the policemen arrived, the
protesters were already trying to sit in their cars and drive away
from the parliament building. But the police pushed the protesters,
including drivers, out of the cars and took them to the station No 9
of the Sabayil district police department.

Rasad Isgandarov, Mahir Mammadli, Ibrahim Telmanoglu for ANS.

Karabakh official slams UN decision to discuss Azerbaijan’s Karabakh

Karabakh official slams UN decision to discuss Azerbaijan’s Karabakh proposal

Mediamax news agency
29 Oct 04

Yerevan, 29 October: “The UN discussion of the situation on the
Nagornyy Karabakh-controlled territories initiated by Azerbaijan proves
once again that the Azerbaijani side is not interested in settling
the whole complex of problems in relations between Azerbaijan and
Nagornyy Karabakh.”

Our Mediamax correspondent reports from Stepanakert that the deputy
foreign minister of the Nagornyy Karabakh Republic [NKR], Masis
Mailyan, said this while commenting on the decision of the UN General
Assembly to recommend that the issue on “the situation on Azerbaijan’s
occupied territories” be included in the assembly’s agenda.

Masis Mailyan said that “this step by official Baku has a purely
propaganda nature and does not help establish a favourable atmosphere
required for achieving a comprehensive solution to the Karabakh
problem”.

Otherwise, the deputy minister said, the Azerbaijani leadership would
have responded to the numerous proposals of the NKR authorities to
start implementing measures to establish trust between the sides and
resume full-scale negotiations, which he said are the most effective
means of solving the conflict.

[Passage omitted: minor details]

“Such destructive actions by Baku create insurmountable obstacles in
solving the problem of refugees and displaced persons and are capable
of nullifying all the efforts of international mediators to establish
a lasting peace and stability in the region,” the NKR deputy foreign
minister stressed.

Armenia should counter Azerbaijan’s hysteria by insisting onself-det

Armenia should counter Azerbaijan’s hysteria by insisting on self-determination

Yerkir/am
October 22, 2004

The options for resolution of Nagorno-Karabagh conflict are regularly
discussed by the Armenian political circles. However, a certain
deficit of proposals exists among our political leaders and analysts.

What do our politicians think about the options of resolution of
Nagorno Karabagh conflict? We asked some of our political leaders
the following questions: 1. The status quo is preserved and the
negotiations do not seem to yield any tangible results. What should
Armenia do in this context? 2. In case the negotiations result in a
consensus and some of the liberated territories are required in return
for Karabaghâ~@~Ys self-determination, what should Armeniaâ~@~Ys
response be to this situation?

3. What if the negotiations end in a deadlock and peace is
threatened? If Azerbaijan starts a war what should Armenia do both
at the external front and in terms of its domestic policies?

We interviewed Armenian Revolutionary Federation Bureau member ,
vice-speaker of the National Assembly Vahan Hovhannissian.

1. When speaking about these issues we have to clarify certain
things at the outset. For instance, when we consider the option of
negotiations ending in a deadlock and Azerbaijan preparing for war,
we should keep in mind that even now when the negotiations are still
in progress Azerbaijan is already preparing for war.

As to the preservation of the status quo, we need to have a clear
understanding of it. There is no such thing as status quo. Some things
are constantly changing and we need to see where those changes can
take us. There is no such thing as static state of affairs. Static
assessment of the existing situation can result in the wrong outcomes
in the future.

Thus, we should try to see those tendencies that can potentially
determine the development of the existing situation in the
future. There are two major tendencies in this respect â~@~S first,
Azerbaijanâ~@~Ys attempts to increase international pressure on Armenia
and second, Azerbaijanâ~@~Ys exploitation of its oil potentials. From
this perspective, the above-mentioned two tendencies do not predict
favorable changes for Armenia especially taking into consideration
that Azerbaijan does not exclude the possibility of another war.

Moving from this starting point we can further clarify possible
scenarios of what Armenia should do. There are three main things
that we have to accomplish. Firstly, Armeniaâ~@~Ys internal social,
human and economic development must be ensured.

I am referring to the establishment and consolidation of civic
institutions and democratization of the society that will eventually
increase the populationâ~@~Y s confidence in the leadership of the
country and its defense capabilities.

This trust is a powerful resource for unifying the nation in case
of external threats. The population participates in the political
processes only if the authorities succeed in ensuring social justice.

We have to understand that if another war breaks out, for us it will
be a patriotic war. However, there are too many people in Armenia who
are disappointed with their homeland and the idea of independence
for different reasons. The government, the countryâ~@~Ys political
leadership must correct this. If we fail to do, that will be the
failure of the political leadership of the country.

Secondly, we must look for alternative transportation routes even
if we have to exert a certain degree of political flexibility for
that purpose. As to the pressure by the international organizations
agitated by Azerbaijan, this is political pressure that aims at
devaluing self-determination and human rights by stressing territorial
integrity without taking into consideration the historical injustice
that fixed the borders determining territorial integrity. We have
to concentrate our efforts on the international arena on presenting
correctly the legal grounding for Nagorno Karabaghâ~@~Ys status in
order to counter the arguments put forward by Azerbaijan.

In other words, we have to distinguish between the concept of autonomy
and state borders. It might seem that this is a theoretical speculation
but it will eventually yield practical results. As soon as Azerbaijan
recovered from the defeat in the war it took up an aggressive position
and started speaking about territorial integrity. Azerbaijanâ~@~Ys
position on the proposals put forward by OSCE Minsk Group derives
from this approach.

We have to understand that the world is not a stage for playing
out political or religious affiliations. Such affiliations do
not affect decision making. Azerbaijanâ~@~Ys hysteria should
be countered by insisting on the concept of autonomy and national
self-determination. We can find allies that will share such an approach
if it also reflects their state and national interests.

2. When negotiations become more active the possible options for
consensus start being discussed. Armenia was correct in that it
included all the phase-by-phase options into one package. Why? Because
all the issues should be considered comprehensively.

Consensus should be reached in several issues including transportation,
territories, demilitarization, etc. As a result if such a consensus
a different status quo will emerge that will guarantee the security
of Nagorno Karabagh Republic.

Many people characterize todayâ~@~Ys situation as dangerous. However,
it has succeeded in guarantying Nagorno Karabaghâ~@~Ys security for
ten years. What is the main factor that made it possible to maintain
the cease-fire for ten years? It is todayâ~@~Ys borderline because
this borderline was created with the purpose of ensuring Karabagh
populationâ~@~Ys security.

Karabagh armed forces had push out the Azeri army. This made
Azerbaijan sign the cease fire because it realized that the border
could move further into the country. A consensus can be made only if
commensurate security guarantees for Nagorno Karabaghâ~@~Ys population
are ensured. What can guarantee security?

The status of Nagorno Karabagh Republic. Sometimes the possibility
of stationing peacekeeping forces is discussed. But peacekeeping
forces cannot be a sustainable solution. If the option of exchange
of territories is discussed all these details must be taken into
consideration. Thatâ~@~Ys all I wanted to say connected with this
question since ARF continues to support the document adopted by the
previous parliament.

We have to find a balance of security guarantees. And we have to
look for this balance in all spheres. By saying balance I mean the
following. For instance, Azerbaijanâ~@~Ys opening road connections
cannot be considered a commensurate concession to giving away a single
square meter of land because they can always close the roads again
but lands can be returned only at the expense of our lives.

3. I want to repeat that Azerbaijan is always preparing for war. Even
when they were pretty close to serious progress on Key West proposal,
even at that time they were speaking about war.

They are constantly preparing for war and we should not wit for their
attack. What countermeasures should we undertake? I think Armenia as
the security guarantor for Nagorno Karabagh Republic will naturally
be involved in any developments related to Karabagh. I think we need
to unify our efforts. Wars can be different.

A war conducted by large scale military forces is not efficient and
cannot solve the problem. The problem can be solved through small but
mobile military troops that will make the war so problematic for the
enemy that they will simply have to stop it.

Interview by Karine Mangasarian

–Boundary_(ID_iVcgXKdcdp05hX8Dt0cjXA)–

Family Has Seen Share of Turmoil

Los Angeles Times
October 27, 2004 Wednesday
Home Edition

The Nation;
Family Has Seen Share of Turmoil;
Along with power and wealth, the clan Teresa Heinz Kerry first married
into has lived through tragedy and estrangement.

by Ralph Vartabedian, Times Staff Writer

PITTSBURGH

If her husband is elected president, Teresa Heinz Kerry will be among
America’s most recognizable figures. But she already is commander of a
family empire that has been a familiar name to Americans for over a
century — one whose history includes political activism and
philanthropy, but also infighting and tragedy.

The Heinz family history is told all over this riverfront city — at a
stylish museum named for Teresa’s late husband, Sen. H.J. “John” Heinz
III, and in archives at Carnegie Mellon University. The name is stamped
on parks, schools and a magnificent limestone chapel at the University
of Pittsburgh.

The symbols of Heinz wealth, power and patronage in Pittsburgh tell the
public story of a pioneering American industrial family almost as
important to food as the Fords are to autos and the Rockefellers are to
oil.

A closer look reveals a long record of conservative as well as liberal
political activity and philanthropy, mixed with epic battles over money
and personal turmoil such as divorces, suicides and alcoholism.

Within the family, there are painful memories of a schism in the 1930s
that led to a 50-year legal battle and helped shape the modern Heinz
family. To this day, it has left some of the grandchildren and
great-grandchildren of patriarch H.J. Heinz feeling cast out.

“Most of the time, people aren’t talking to each other,” said Nancy
Heinz Russell, a granddaughter of H.J. Heinz. “That’s what happens when
people have money.”

Teresa Thierstein Simoes-Ferreira joined the family in 1966, when she
married John Heinz, future Republican senator from Pennsylvania and
great-grandson of H.J. Heinz, the ketchup and pickle king.

She assumed control of the family empire in 1991 after Sen. Heinz died
in a plane crash. Five years later, she married John F. Kerry, a
Democratic senator from Massachusetts.

Even as she made a new life with Kerry, she remained loyal to the
Pittsburgh branch of the family. She is addressed by her staff as Mrs.
Heinz, and her legal residence is the Heinz family estate outside of
town.

She has fought fiercely to protect the family image. Ten years ago,
Heinz Kerry hired an archivist to research the family tree, but has
kept the findings private, even within the family. She declined to be
interviewed for this article.

After a lengthy genealogical investigation, The Times has identified
the other descendants of H.J. Heinz, founder of the pioneering food
company, who died in 1919 at age 74.

He left three wings of the family under daughter Irene and sons Howard
and Clifford. Four generations later, there are more than three dozen
descendants.

The family is spread far and wide, most having severed their
Pennsylvania roots years ago. In several cases, The Times’ reporting
led to members of the Heinz family getting in touch with each for the
first time, including two distant cousins living a few streets apart
near Monterey.

Except for Heinz Kerry and her three sons, most of the family lives in
California. Heinz Kerry, worth at least $1 billion, controls the lion’s
share of the family’s money, but there are other centers of wealth and
sharply varied political views about how it should be used.

Separate Lives

Heinzes pioneered the industrialization of the U.S. food supply, pushed
government reforms to improve food safety and advocated for military
intervention to stop the Armenian genocide.

Heinz Kerry is the family’s largest philanthropist, but other Heinzes
have opened their wallets for public causes from Orange County to New
York. Family money has funded hospitals, assisted the poor and educated
scientists and artists.

The family has also experienced tragedies, most notably the midair
plane collision over a suburban Philadelphia schoolyard that killed
Sen. Heinz and six others. Far less known is the alcoholism, suicide,
eccentric behavior and marital instability that have plagued all three
wings of the family.

Along the way, there were odd encounters with the rich and powerful.
Rock star David Bowie wrote the song “Young Americans” for his good
friend in the celebrity circuit, the late Sharon Heinz Tingle. Sarah
Heinz Waller, whose husband was a maverick Chicago alderman in the
1920s, was personally threatened by mobster Al Capone, friends and
family say.

Many Heinz family members today lead very private lives, tired of jokes
about ketchup and requests for loans. Family members no longer manage
H.J. Heinz Co., and they own less than 4% of the firm’s stock.

Some descendants have no real sense of heritage or kinship.

“I had no idea I had any relationship with this family until I was 12
years old,” said Wilda Northrop, a watercolor artist and a
great-granddaughter of H.J. Heinz. “I was raised that this was a big
secret.”

Northrop, president of the Carmel Art Assn., shook hands this year with
Heinz Kerry at a fundraising event, but didn’t mention she was the
second cousin of Heinz Kerry’s late husband.

Northrop’s son, Lowell, is supporting Sen. Kerry’s campaign, making
videos for MoveOn.org, the liberal activist group. Lowell Northrop says
he knows little about Heinz Kerry.

“It’s an interesting little story that I am a Heinz, but it is not
something I have gone out of my way to tell anybody,” he said in a
phone interview. “Money sometimes brings out the worst in people.”

‘Just Johnny Heinz’

The man Heinz Kerry married was the child of Joan Diehl Heinz and H.J.
“Jack” Heinz II. The couple’s marriage did not last long, and they
played very different roles in their son’s upbringing.

After their divorce, Joan moved to San Francisco with her young son in
tow and, an aviation pioneer herself, married naval pilot Monty
McCauley.

“No one in San Francisco knew where he came from,” said a family
friend, Ted Stebbins, referring to the future senator. “He was just
Johnny Heinz.”

Meanwhile, Jack Heinz, the father, was a consummate jet-setter. He
owned a dozen homes and had two more wives after Joan. Suave and
imperious, he hobnobbed with British royalty and Greek shipping tycoons
while running the family company from Pittsburgh.

By most accounts, Jack Heinz had a distant relationship with his only
son, and was none too happy when he learned that the main heir to the
family fortune wanted to marry the daughter of a Mozambique doctor.

“His dad disapproved of his marriage…. The story was that his dad
felt he had been hoodwinked by a fortune-seeking European woman,”
recalls Cliff Shannon, who headed John Heinz’s Senate staff in the
1980s. “Eventually, he made his peace with Teresa.”

Jack Heinz underwrote the performance hall for the highly regarded
Pittsburgh Symphony. Less well known is the philanthropy of his
ex-wives.

Drue Heinz, the last of Jack Heinz’s wives, had bit parts in film, and
still controls a foundation with assets of $32 million that supports
some of the top fiction writers in America.

His first wife, Joan McCauley, who died in 1999, left the bulk of her
$31-million estate in the Bay Area, contributing to the San Francisco
Museum of Modern Art and the ARCS Foundation, which supports the
nation’s elite students in science and engineering.

Progressive Legacy

The progressive views of family patriarch H.J. Heinz were out of sync
with early 20th century capitalism. He provided employees with medical
care and adult education. Some of his factories had rooftop gardens
where workers could relax.

It was in this era that armed guards for U.S. Steel killed 10 employees
during the infamous 1892 Homestead strike at a plant in Pittsburgh. In
a move laden with symbolism, Heinz Kerry would later purchase the
abandoned U.S. Steel plant and turn it into a public park.

“He treated his workers better than anybody I have seen in the early
20th century,” Nancy Koehn, a historian at Harvard Business School,
said of H.J. Heinz. “He was the real deal.”

H.J. Heinz was branded a traitor in some sectors of the food industry
because he supported government intervention to ensure minimum safety
standards. As food-processing scandals raged in the background, he
pushed hard for the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, which created the
Food and Drug Administration.

His son Howard, also deeply involved in public service, was sent to the
Middle East by the Wilson administration after World War I to head
famine-relief efforts. On the day H.J. Heinz died, Howard was
delivering 30,000 tons of food to the region, where he witnessed the
unfolding genocide that took the lives of 1.5 million Armenians.

Howard tried to get Wilson to send troops to halt the slaughter in
harsh, remote areas of eastern Turkey and Armenia. In a dispatch to the
president, he wrote, “I do not believe America, when she knows the
truth, will be satisfied to have all our ideals of humanity thrown to
one side while these people are murdered.”

His pleas were ignored.

It was Howard’s grandson, John Heinz, who became a U.S. senator and
came to personify a moderate Republicanism similar to his
grandfather’s.

John Heinz tried working in the family business but left unsatisfied
after five years. He became a college professor, and in 1971 was
elected to Congress, six years after marrying Heinz Kerry.

Sen. Heinz drew an unusual mix of support. Steelworkers liked his
protectionist policies, and he tirelessly promoted the coal industry.
But he also backed environmentalists’ efforts to clean up the state’s
air and water. On the campaign trail, he successfully masked his
blue-blood pedigree.

“He had a common touch,” said Louis Pagnotti, whose family owns a
Pennsylvania coal mine. “And Teresa was a big hit in the ethnic
communities up here.”

Since the death of her husband, Heinz Kerry has kept tight control over
family documents. About 10 years ago, she began collecting detailed
personal information from distant relatives, recalled Robert Heinz, a
great-grandson of H.J. Heinz.

After meeting the family archivist for lunch in San Francisco, Robert
Heinz said, he repeatedly asked to see the family tree — with no
success. “The archivist finally told me that Teresa has not authorized
it,” Heinz said in a phone interview.

A Conservative Side

If Sen. John Heinz represented the family’s moderate politics and
public policy, Clifford Heinz represents a different outlook.

A grandson of H.J. Heinz, Clifford has long — and quietly —
underwritten conservative causes from his base in Orange County. He has
acquired a wealth, celebrity and power separate and apart from the
Pennsylvania wing of the family.

When the Dalai Lama won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1989, he was awakened
with the news at Clifford’s mansion in Newport Beach, where he was a
guest.

Heinz has helped fund the Free Congress Foundation, a Washington-based
think tank, and has underwritten the campaigns of various Republicans,
including Rep. Dana Rohrabacher of Huntington Beach. He has long funded
ethics programs and endowed a chair for peace studies at UC Irvine.

“Clifford is a very principled, conservative Republican,” Rohrabacher
said.

Clifford Heinz, 85, declined to be interviewed. His attorney, Bernard
I. Segal, said his client had no desire to be drawn into a public
controversy with Heinz Kerry. To put it mildly, the two have little in
common politically.

Clifford Heinz was a key financial supporter of Oliver North,
contributing $25,000 to his unsuccessful Senate campaign in 1994 — the
same year Teresa Heinz sharply attacked the former U.S. Marine colonel
and his role in the Iran-Contra matter in a speech before the National
Assn. of Christians and Jews.

“It is difficult to imagine anything more cynical than Oliver North
running for Congress,” she said in her speech. “This is a man who used
his moment in the public eye to spit not just on politicians, but on
the institution of Congress itself.”

Geographic Schism

Not long after the death of patriarch H.J. Heinz in 1919, his
descendants began migrating to California, and a Western branch of the
family came to outnumber the Eastern branch. By the Depression, a
full-blown schism had occurred, centered around who would get the
family wealth held by the senior Clifford Heinz.

A director and vice president for labor relations, Clifford had always
been second fiddle to his older brother, Howard. And by the Depression,
Howard’s son Jack was playing an influential role in the family
business.

The battle began in March 1935, when the senior Clifford Heinz died of
pneumonia at a Palm Springs hotel. He had left Pittsburgh three months
earlier, hoping the dry desert air could cure him. Clifford’s third
wife, Vira Ingham, was by his side when he died.

But the three children from his second marriage — Clifford, Nancy and
Dorothy — were never informed of their father’s illness, even though
they lived only a few hours away in Beverly Hills. Their mother was
socialite Sara Moliere Young, who had run afoul of the Pittsburgh
family.

After their father’s death, the teenage children received a second
jolt, discovering that in Clifford’s final will, they had been
disinherited. They came to believe that decision was made on his
deathbed under pressure from the elders of the Pittsburgh clan.

“They tried to cut us out of the will,” recalled Nancy Heinz Russell.
“Dad was not a strong, forceful man … and the Heinz family hated my
mother. The Eastern family hated the Western family.”

The resulting lawsuit dragged on for decades, ultimately resulting in
the children getting a large share of key Heinz trust funds.

It wasn’t the only time the family played tough when it came to money.

Rust Heinz, grandson to the company founder, moved to Pasadena in the
1930s and married Helen Clay Goodloe, daughter of a prominent family
from Kentucky that included a U.S. senator and an ambassador.

When Rust was killed in a 1939 car accident, Heinz family attorneys
persuaded his wife to take $25,000 and forfeit any claim to the family
money. The couple had separated, but they were still legally married.

The inside story of what had happened was detailed in a newspaper
article 16 years later in the Pittsburgh Press. The headline: “Heinz
widow traded fortune for $25,000.”

After a second unhappy marriage, Helen Heinz took her life, according
to her daughter, Margot Pierrong, a convention planner who lives in
Anaheim.

“She was so young,” Pierrong said. “I am not bitter, but what the Heinz
family did to my mother will come around.”

Out of Public View

Irene Heinz, the eldest child of the company founder, married and moved
to Manhattan, and her branch of the family virtually disappeared from
public view.

Irene’s husband, John LaPorte Given, suffered a nervous breakdown —
under the harsh treatment of the Heinz family, according to his
granddaughter. He retired early to play golf, and gave away tens of
millions of dollars to Harvard University and other schools.

A daughter, Sarah Given, came to distrust the family money, saying it
destroyed personal character. She married twice, the second time to a
firefighter.

Sarah’s younger brother, John Given, became estranged from the family
and was known for eccentric behavior. New York City police arrested him
in 1948 on allegations that he beat a man with his cane.

When police examined the cane, they found a 28-inch dagger in its
shaft. Four years later, after he fired a pistol at a neighbor’s
birthday party, he was ordered by a New Jersey magistrate to leave
town.

Given, who never married and suffered from alcoholism, died in 1957. In
his will, he instructed executors at Chase Manhattan Bank to find
deserving beneficiaries for his estate.

They gave more than $4.5 million to charity.

GRAPHIC: GRAPHIC: Heinz family tree CREDIT: Lorena Iniguez Los Angeles
Times PHOTO: ‘BIG SECRET’: Wilda Northrop, an artist living in Pacific
Grove, didn’t know she was related to the Heinzes until she was 12.
PHOTOGRAPHER: David Paul Morris For The Times PHOTO: FUTURE SENATOR:
John Heinz and his wife, Teresa, in 1976, upon hearing that he won the
GOP nomination for the Senate. PHOTOGRAPHER: Associated Press PHOTO:
MATRIARCH: Teresa Heinz Kerry, wife of John F. Kerry, remains deeply
involved in the Heinz family. PHOTOGRAPHER: Pablo Martinez Monsivais
Associated Press

Chinese FM satisfied with first official visit to Azerbaijan

Chinese FM satisfied with first official visit to Azerbaijan

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
25 Oct. 2004

Baku, October 23, AssA-Irada

Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing, who arrived in Baku for his
first official visit on Friday, met with his Azerbaijani counterpart
Elmar Mammadyarov on Saturday. The two ministers held a joint news
conference following the meeting.

The status of political, economic, cultural, educational, tourism
and humanitarian relations between the two countries were discussed
during the meeting, Mammadyarov told the news conference.

Pointing out the high level bilateral relations, Mammadyarov underlined
that both countries have common position on regional issues and
within international organizations. “China supports Azerbaijan’s
right position on the Upper Garabagh conflict,” he noted.

Expressing satisfaction with his first visit to Baku, Zhaoxing called
Azerbaijan a friendly country. Recalling the deep historical roots
of the Azerbaijan-China relations, the Chinese foreign minister said:
“If earlier the Silk Way was connecting our states, today our attempts
to achieve peace and development make our countries closer.”

Assessing late Azerbaijani President Heydar Aliyev’s visit to China
in 1994 as a successful one, Zhaoxing stressed that relations between
the two countries began to develop rapidly after the visit. “China
and Azerbaijan have common interests in political issues and we always
trust and support each other,” he underlined.

Touching upon bilateral economic relations, the Chinese diplomat said
that there exists great potential to increase goods turnover between
the two countries. He welcomed Chinese business people’s investments
in the Azerbaijani economy.

Speaking about great changes happened in China over the recent years,
Zhaoxing invited Azerbaijani journalists to his country to witness
the changes.*

Meeting at NKR National Assembly

MEETING AT NKR NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

Azat Artsakh – Nagorno Karabakh Republic (NKR)
22 Oct 04

On October 20 the speaker of the NKR National Assembly Oleg Yessayan
met with the British group of the Inter-Parliamentary Union on visit
in Stepanakert. The delegation included members of parliament of the
House of Commons Gordon Marsden (head of the delegation), Jane
Griffits, Candy Aterton, member of the House of Lords Baroness
Caroline Cox, vice secretary of the group Jim Rogers.

Addressing the guests, the speaker of the National Assembly pointed
out the significance of the visit of the delegation representing the
British parliament. At the same time he mentioned that this and
similar events in Nagorni Karabakh are not regarded as a fact of
recognizing NKR but are highly appreciated asan `expression of
attention towards our country and people’. Gordon Marsden said that
taking into consideration all the political complications, as
individual parliamentarians they personally treat Karabakh people and
theirefforts with respect, the evidence to which is this cognitive
visit. During the talk questions concerning the Karabakh problem and
the process of peaceful settlement, the formation of the legislative
sphere, post war restoration, results of democratization of the public
and political life in Karabakh were discussed. `We think’, said the NA
speaker, `that we shall not attract theattention of the European
community if we do not direct our efforts at promotion of the commonly
acceptable values adopted by Europe and building a civil society.’
Mentioning that a lot still has to be done on this way, he said, `We
are readyto present to our guests all we have achieved without being
recognized, without the help of the international community.’ At the
meeting were present the chairman of the NKR NA permanent committee of
foreign relationships Vahram Atanessian, leaders of the parliament
groups of Democratic Liberal Union and Armenian Revolutionary
Federation Janna Galstian and Vahram Balayan, vice foreign minister of
NKR Masis Mayilian.

AA.
22-10-2004

`Existence of Armenian Apostolic Church Endangered’

`EXISTENCE OF ARMENIAN APOSTOLIC CHURCH ENDANGERED’

A1+
21-10-2004

Members of `Ramkavar’ Party of Armenia are alarmed for the atmosphere
around the Armenian Apostolic Church. They think existence and further
activity of Church are doubtful.

‘Establishment of Anthilias Diocese in Canada, bombing of the Armenian
Church in Iraq, the `traditional’ curses addressed to the
ecclesiastics in Jerusalem and disappearance of Deacon Zorik Abeshyan
in Vladikavkaz, Russiaserved as bases for such a
conclusion. Legalization of various sects, including `Jehovah’s
Witnesses’ activity paves the way for deceiving Armenian people joined
around the Armenian Apostolic Church of 1700-year-long history’, Party
statement says.

Respecting the basic norms of human rights, Republican Department of
`Ramkavar ‘ Party considers unacceptable registration of the religious
organizations, which activity is lined to harm forming of the civil
society and health of individuals.

Taking into account all the circumstances, Republican Department of
`Ramkavar’ Party expresses willingness to support all the Dioceses of
Saint Echmiadzin Church both in the homeland and Diaspora through all
the `Ramkavar’ structures in Armenia. `Ramkavar’ also calls upon
social, political and cultural organizations to join the action.

British parliament delegation arrives in Nagornyy Karabakh

British parliament delegation arrives in Nagornyy Karabakh – Armenian agency

Mediamax news agency
20 Oct 04

YEREVAN

A delegation of the British parliament headed by a member of the House
of Commons, Gordon Marsden, arrived on a one-day fact-finding visit to
the Nagornyy Karabakh Republic (NKR) today.

Today, the British parliamentarians will be received by NKR President
Arkadiy Gukasyan and National Assembly Chairman Oleg Yesayan,
Mediamax’s correspondent reports from Stepanakert Xankandi .

The British delegation is also scheduled to meet representatives of
Nagornyy Karabakh NGOs.