More Hamas Killing Suspects Found

MORE HAMAS KILLING SUSPECTS FOUND

BBC NEWS
iddle_east/8530354.stm
2010/02/23 12:30:24 GMT

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has identified four more users of
European passports suspected of involvement in the killing of a Hamas
leader in Dubai.

Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, one of the founders of Hamas’ military wing,
was found dead in a hotel on 20 January.

The killing has been widely blamed on the Israeli secret service.

Israel has refused to confirm or deny involvement.

At least 15 people using European passports have been identified as
suspects in the case.

The British Foreign Office has confirmed it has received information
from the UAE about another two suspects carrying British passports,
bringing the total number of British passports used to eight.

The Irish Foreign Ministry has said it too has been informed about
two more suspects who used Irish passports with genuine numbers but
fake names and photographs.

A total of five Irish identities were used.

Dubai authorities had already released the identities of 11 people
who travelled under the false passports. French and German identities,
as well as British and Irish ones, were used.

The UK government denies it had any prior knowledge of the fake British
passports being used, although shadow foreign secretary William Hague
said it was "entirely possible" the government had been alerted.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/world/m

OSCE To Monitor The Line Of Contact

OSCE TO MONITOR THE LINE OF CONTACT

armradio.am
22.02.2010 17:01

The recurrent monitoring of the line of contact between the Armed
Forces of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic and Azerbaijan will be carried
out in Aghdam region on February 23.

>From the Azerbaijani side the monitoring will be conducted by the
Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office Andrzej Kasprzyk
and his Field Assistants Vladimir Chuntulov and Peter Kii.

>From the Armenian side the monitoring will be carried out by
Field Assistants of the Personal Representative of the OSCE
Chairman-in-Office Jaslin Nurtazin and Irzhi Aberle.

New Children’s Publication, `Gakavig,’ Unveiled

New Children’s Publication, `Gakavig,’ Unveiled

n%e2%80%99s-publication-%e2%80%98gakavig%e2%80%99- unveiled/
By Asbarez Staff on Feb 19th, 2010

BURBANK – `Gakavig’ children’s magazine was launched in Los Angeles on
February 3. The unveiling of the magazine was hosted by the `Shoghart
Gallery’ located in Burbank. Among the attendees were representatives
from the community media, Armenian schools, the Western Diocese and
Western Prelacy of the United States as well as friends and supporters
of Gakavig.

`As exciting and pleasant the initiation of such a project can be it
is also a very responsible production, full of future challenges and
obstacles. I fully realize the extent of the responsibility this
venture entails and feel completely ready to overcome them’, says the
managing editor of the magazine and the person behind this project,
Juliette Davtian.

Mistress of Ceremonies Liza Jiguerian-Manoyan welcomed the guests and
invited Rev. Ardag Demirdjian representing Western Prelate Archbishop
Moushegh Mardirossian and Very Rev. Hovsep Hagopian representing
Western Primate Archbishop Hovnan Derderian to perform the official
blessing ceremony of Gakavig.

In her opening remarks Jiguerian-Manoyan welcomed such a long awaited
magazine in the Armenian community wishing Gakavig future success and
growth. She expressed hope that the children’s magazine will reach
every child in the Armenian community and will play its unique role in
the Armenian education of our future generation.

Subsequently, Jiguerian-Manoyan read the congratulatory letter
received from the Armenia’s Diaspora Minister Hranoush Hagopyan who
stated, `During these difficult times I wish you a peaceful path and
successful creative achievement as you have begun the sacred mission
of trying to preserve the Armenian language, the most powerful weapon
of our nation within the hearts of our future generation.’

In her remarks, Davtian said, `If up until a few hours ago Gakavig was
the result of my personal vision and desire, starting from now it
belongs to all of us here and to the entire Armenian community and it
must be everyone’s responsibility to safeguard this magazine and help
in it’s growth and enhancement.’

Davtian expressed her sincere gratitude to the major sponsor of the
magazine, Haigoush Keghinian-Kohler, for her genuine enthusiasm and
input in this project. Davtian declared Keghinian-Kohler the official
godmother of the publication and thanked her for her vision and
guidance. Davtian also also thanked Mr & Mrs Neshan Peroomian for
their financial contribution.

Following the welcoming remarks, the traditional unveiling ceremony
took place with the participation of editors, guests and benefactors
in attendance, who anointed the inaugural issue with wine.

Gakavig is a colorful monthly intended for 3 to 7 year olds. The
magazine has colorful artwork and features stories, poems, riddles,
songs, cut-and-paste projects, children’s cooking projects, a bit of
science, and more. Using classical Armenian spelling, the magazine is
in both Eastern and Western Armenian.

Gakavig is available through several Armenian schools and in Southern
California grocery stores. Subscriptions are available by calling
1-818-548-2438 or writing [email protected].

http://www.asbarez.com/77740/new-childre

‘Football Diplomacy’ Leads To Another Front At The Foreign Policy

‘FOOTBALL DIPLOMACY’ LEADS TO ANOTHER FRONT AT THE FOREIGN POLICY

Aysor
Feb 18 2010
Armenia

"In the context of Armenia-Turkey reconciliation, Russia sought for
just protocols’ signing, not border’s opening," said at the press
conference member of the oppositional Armenian National Congress
David Shakhnazarian.

According to the politician, Russia’s government has initiated the
process to suppress Turkey and force Turkey to make some concessions.

Russia succeeded to reach some agreements with Turkey at the expense
of Armenia, pointed David Shakhnazarian.

The U.S.’s position is to discuss issue of the Genocide, as this is a
measure to press Armenia and Turkey. "The U.S. is trying to save the
situation, and now is forcing Armenia to ratify protocols first. The
U.S. will recognize the Genocide neither now, nor tomorrow and in
the near future," he said.

Armenia will ratify the protocols under pressure of the international
communities, said David Shakhnazarian. In addition, Turkey will still
be expecting progress in the process of settlement to the Karabakh
conflict.

"So, in this situation, process of normalisation of relations between
Armenia and Turkey has turned into a conflict. Actually, this is a
new conflict. The ‘football diplomacy’ led to another front at the
foreign policy."

Russia Delays Anti-Aircraft System Delivery To Iran

RUSSIA DELAYS ANTI-AIRCRAFT SYSTEM DELIVERY TO IRAN

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
17.02.2010 15:38 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Alexander Fomin, First Deputy Director of Federal
Service for Military-Technical Cooperation (FSMTC of Russia) said
Russia will deliver anti-aircraft system o-300 to Iran only after
eliminating the revealed technical defects.

According to him, the delivery will be fulfilled, when all the
technical problems are resolved.

However, he didn’t specify the kind of technical problems or how long
it would take to eliminate them, Interfax reported.

Protocols Ratification And Implementation- Necessary Condition To Un

PROTOCOLS RATIFICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION- NECESSARY CONDITION TO UNLEASH ARMENIA’S POTENTIAL

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
17.02.2010 17:21 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ If Turkey-Armenia rapprochement, initiated by
Armenia, supported by the most influential actors of the international
arena, namely Russia, USA and EU that led to the signature of bilateral
protocols on 10 October 2009 were to succeed, it would deeply transform
and enhance the strategic posture of both Armenia and Turkey. Moreover,
its spill-over effect would have the potential to firmly stabilize the
region and turn it into a vibrant pole of global economy, Dr. Sargis
Ghazaryan , Senior Research Fellow at European Friends of Armenia
organization told PanARMENIAN.Net reporter.

"In the recent history of Armenia, strategically important decisions
over political and macro-economic planning and vision of Armenia’s very
identity have all been shaped by its hostile geopolitical environment
in terms of armed conflicts, galloping race of arms, war rhetoric,
competition for hegemony, closed borders, illegal and unilateral
embargoes and lack viable mechanisms for regional cooperation. While
the degree of regional segmentation is high in the region, the degree
of security is alarmingly low.

The ratification of the protocols and full implementation of their
provisions are a necessary condition to overcome geography and to
unleash the real potential of Armenia and eventually, of the South
Caucasus. The success of such a process can put an end to nationalism
and populism and boost diversity, multiculturalism and cosmopolitanism.

I think that we are witnessing the genesis of one of the most
unprecedented and epochal transformations that the South Caucasus
and the wider geopolitical macro-region have undergone in the last
century. Armenia is contributing, in good faith, to the transformation
into reality of such a process that only a few years ago political
analysts and commentators would call utopia.

It’s up to the Turkish leadership, now, to prove its commitment to
this process, without using preconditions and pretexts to derail it.

After all, it’s about the very credibility of Turkey as a member
of the International Community and a candidate to EU membership,"
Sargis Ghazaryan stated.

The Protocols aimed at normalization of bilateral ties and opening of
the border between Armenia and Turkey were signed in Zurich by Armenian
Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian and his Turkish counterpart Ahmet
Davutoglu on October 10, 2009, after a series of diplomatic talks
held through Swiss mediation.

On January 12, 2010, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of
Armenia found the protocols conformable to the country’s Organic Law.

BAKU: Responsibility For Unresolved Karabakh Conflict Lies With OSCE

RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNRESOLVED KARABAKH CONFLICT LIES WITH OSCE MINSK GROUP

news.az
Feb 17 2010
Azerbaijan

OSCE OSCE Minsk Group is fully responsible for the unresolved
Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict over Nagorno Karabakh.

"Instead of dealing with their immediate responsibilities in the
negotiations for a peaceful settlement of Armenian-Azerbaijani
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the OSCE Minsk Group are interfering
with Turkish-Armenian relations", said Vugar Gadirov, chairman of
the youth organization of refugees and internally displaced persons
in Azerbaijan, member of the Council of State support to NGOs under
the President of Azerbaijan, at the event, dedicated to the 18th
anniversary of the Khojaly genocide.

"The mediation of the OSCE Minsk Group in the settlement of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is ineffective and unsuitable. The OSCE
Minsk Group member-states created conditions for the spread of the
conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh. The 366th motorized infantry regiment of
the Soviet Army took part in the termination of civilians in Khojaly.

France has long had close ties with Armenia. But Washington has not
lifted Amendment 907 to the Act of Promotion of Freedom, directed
against Azerbaijan, and use it as leverage of pressure on official
Baku," he stressed.

Kazakhstan Not Substitute For OSCE Minsk Group

KAZAKHSTAN NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR OSCE MINSK GROUP

news.am
Feb 16 2010
Armenia

Kazakhstan’s seeking a more active role in the Nagorno-Karabakh peace
process as OSCE chairing state can by no means be viewed as Astana’s
intention to replace the OSCE Minsk Group formed to deal with the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the former Armenian Ambassador to Syria,
orientalist David Hovhannisyan told NEWS.am.

"The Kazakh Foreign Minister may have made a statement on Astana’s
contribution to the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in the
context of Kazakhstan’s role in establishing the cease-fire in the
conflict zone, which, however, does not at all mean that Kazakhstan
can replace the OSCE Minsk Group in the negotiation process,"
Hovhannisyan said.

The expert Alexander Manasyan, in turn, stated that the success of
Kazakhstan’s mission depends on Astana’s balanced attitude to the
conflicting parties. "Kazakhstan is stating now that it is well
informed on the essence of the conflict, but Astana must prove
it. If, during this period, Kazakhstan has not only been kept track
of the negotiations, but has also elaborated balanced and effective
proposals for the settlement, its claims on mediation may be crowned
with success. But if Kazakhstan states it is well informed of the
essence of the conflict, but it is really misinformed, Astana’s
mission is doomed to failure," the expert said.

NEWS.am reminds the readers that at a recent news conference
in Yerevan, OSCE Chairman-in-Office, Kazakh Foreign Minister
Kanat Saudabayev stated that Kazakhstan is well informed of the
Nagorno-Karabakh problem and is keeping track of the negotiations. "We
intend to give possible impetus to the resolution of the problem. But
the key is in the conflicting parties hands. We are cautiously
optimistic about Nagorno-Karabakh peace process," Saudabayev said.

Events In Khojaly (NKR) And Near Agdam On February 25-27, 1992

EVENTS IN KHOJALY (NKR) AND NEAR AGDAM ON FEBRUARY 25-27, 1992

tml
Feb 15, 2010

Khojaly is also often spelled as Xocali, Khojaly, Khodzhaly, Khojalu,
Khocalu, Khocali, Khocaly

Azerbaijan turned Khojaly into a launch pad for indiscriminate
bombardment of Karabakh In 1991 and early 1992, Azerbaijan used an
Azeri inhabited village of Khojaly in Nagorno Karabakh as a launching
pad for indiscriminate artillery and rocket fire on Stepanakert,
the capital of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic (NKR), located only
a short 15-minute drive from Khojaly. By the end of February 1992,
intensive fire from Khojaly and other Azeri military strongholds in
Karabakh had killed 243 people, including 14 children and 37 women,
and wounded 491, including 53 children and 70 women. In addition,
systematic and intense artillery and rocket fire against civilian
targets in Stepanakert paralyzed the city, destroying hospitals,
administrative buildings, schools, and homes. By controlling Khojaly,
Azerbaijan also prohibited access to Karabakh’s airport, the only
link with the outside world, which was used to bring food and medical
aid. Furthermore, Khojaly was also used as a staging area for military
offensives on Stepanakert and nearby Armenian-populated villages. Thus,
Khojaly became a legitimate military target for Self-Defense Forces
of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic.

Legitimate target for NKR Self-Defense Units In early January 1992,
Nagorno Karabakh authorities decided to neutralize this military
target and informed the Azeris. The NKR authorities also transmitted
this information by radio, TV, loudspeakers, leaflets and other
methods to warn the Khojaly civilian population of the upcoming
operation, giving the civilian population an opportunity to exit
the area through a safe corridor. Azerbaijan’s leadership in Baku,
as well as local authorities, and military commanders in Khojaly
knew about the corridor, its width and direction. Both Azerbaijani
President Ayaz Mutalibov and Khojaly Mayor Elman Mamedov in their
1992 interviews confirmed this fact. During two weeks leading to the
Khojaly operation, NKR Self-Defense Forces observed a mass exodus of
the civilian population from Khojaly through the provided corridor
(see on the map).

The operation to neutralize Khojaly base of the Azeri armed forces
began at 11:00 PM on February 25 and was successfully completed within
five hours. Nagorno Karabakh forces took full control of the area,
killing dozens of military personnel during the operation.

Unfortunately, 11 civilians became unintended victims. About 700
civilians and military surrendered to NKR Self-Defense Forces. The
captured civilians were returned to Azerbaijan in the following days,
while the military personnel was later exchange for the Armenian
military prisoners and civilian hostages held by Azerbaijan.

Events on the territory controlled by Azerbaijan, 7 miles from Khojaly,
after the Khojaly operation was over

Map of the Events in Khojaly (NKR) and near Agdam (Azerbaijan) on
February 25-27, 1992 [ view large map ]

When the military operation began in Khojaly, a large group of
civilians and armed military personnel from Khojaly used the provided
humanitarian corridor to exit the battlefield and began moving in the
direction of the Azeri- controlled Agdam. Near Nakhichevanik village
of Karabakh (outside of the provided corridor), the group provoked
a gun battle with the defenders of Nakhichevanik, which resulted in
numerous death on both sides. On February 28 and early March 1992,
in the area then fully controlled by Azerbaijan, Azerbaijani and
Turkish journalists videotaped images of the hundreds of killed and,
during the second video shooting session, also mutilated bodies.

Since then, official Baku has falsified the events and used the
human tragedy to persistently fan anti-Armenian hysteria to demonize
the Armenian people in the eyes of the Azeris and the international
community. It used the images to incite anti-Armenian sentiment and
intolerance, which resulted in murders and calls from Azeris to wipe
out Armenians as an ethnic group.

Conclusion

Responsibility for the tragic loss of civilian life on February 26-27,
1992 on the outskirts of Agdam, territory fully controlled by Azeri
forces, lies with the political and military leadership of Azerbaijan.

First, the Azeri leadership used the territory of Khojaly for
indiscriminate artillery attacks on civilian targets, thus turning
the town into a legitimate military target for NKR Self-Defense Forces.

Second, the Azeri leadership intentionally prevented the civilian
population from leaving the militarized village.

Third, the Azeri leadership failed to safely relocate civilians
from Khojaly after public warnings of upcoming military operation,
although it had many opportunities to do so.

Fourth, retreating Azeri forces provoked an exchange of fire with NKR
Self-Defense Forces some five miles from Khojaly, which resulted in
losses on both sides.

Fifth, those who had continued, full access to the site of reported
close-range, mass killing are responsible for it. The reported killing
of hundreds of civilians with incidences of barbaric mutilation of
bodies took place near Agdam (some seven miles from Khojaly), on
the territory controlled by Azeri forces. Free access to the site by
Azeri and Turkish journalists is clear evidence to that end.

In addition, Azerbaijan continues to create ground for a prolonged
human tragedy by inciting anti-Armenian sentiments and intolerance in
Azeri society. Such a policy stalls efforts to build bridges between
Armenian and Azeri people and achieve eventual, long-lasting peace
between Azerbaijan and Nagorno Karabakh.

* * *

Background data, journalistic investigation and academic research
materials to support the above information are available at the NKR
Office and can be provided on-demand.

————————————– ——————————————

In the course of discussing the issue "On Violation of Human Rights and
Main Freedoms throughout the World" at the fifty-seventh session of
the UN Commission on Human Rights, the Armenian delegation submitted
to the Chairman of the UN Commission on Human Rights information on
the real events of February 1992, which was spread as an official
document of the fifty-seventh session of the aforementioned Commission.

The text of the document is given below.

THE TRUTH ABOUT THE EVENTS IN KHOJALY

Evidence from Azerbaijani sources For nine years after the events
in Khojaly official Baku has been obstinately fanning anti-Armenian
hysteria with the aim of falsifying real events and discrediting the
Armenian people in the eyes of the international community.

The events in Khojaly, which led to the death of civilians, were
the results solely of political intrigues and a struggle for power
in Azerbaijan.

The real reasons are most convincingly reflected in the accounts
of Azerbaijanis themselves – as participants in and eyewitnesses of
what happened – as well as of those who know the whole inside story
of the events in Baku.

According to Azerbaijani journalist M. Safarogly, "Khojaly occupied
an important strategic position. The loss of Khojaly was a political
fiasco for Mutalibov". 1

Khojaly, along with Shushi and Agdam, was one of the main strongholds
from which Stepanakert, the capital of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic,
was shelled continuously and mercilessly for three winter months
using artillery and missiles and launchers for targeting cities.

Knocking out the weapon emplacements in Khojaly and freeing the
airport were the only way for the inhabitants of the Nagorno Karabakh
Republic to ensure the physical survival of a population condemned by
Azerbaijan to complete annihilation. The daily shelling of Stepanakert
from nearby Khojaly took the lives of peaceful inhabitants – women,
children and old people.

Former President of Azerbaijan, Ayaz Mutalibov, has emphasized that
"…

the assault on Khojaly was not a surprise attack"2. In a "Nezavisimaya
gazeta" newspaper interview he stated that "a corridor was kept open
by the Armenians for people to leave"3. However, a column of civilians
was fired on by armed units of the Popular Front of Azerbaijan on the
approaches to the Agdam district border, a fact later confirmed by Ayaz
Mutalibov, who linked this criminal act to attempts by the opposition
to remove him from power, and blamed it entirely for what happened.

In his recent interview with the "Novoye vremya" magazine, Mutalibov
confirms his statement of nine year ago: "The shooting of the Khojaly
residents was obviously organized by someone to take control in
Azerbaijan"4.

Similar comments and views concerning the events in Khojaly are known
to have been made by several other highly-placed Azerbaijani officials
and journalists.

There is, moreover, the conclusion of Azerbaijani journalist Arif
Yunusov, which differs somewhat from the previous statements: "The
town and its inhabitants were deliberately sacrificed for a political
purpose – to prevent the Popular Front of Azerbaijan from coming to
power"5. In this case, though, the Azerbaijanis themselves are named
as the perpetrators of the tragedy.

What resulted from the betrayal of the inhabitants of Khojaly by their
own highly placed compatriots is well known. Azerbaijani propaganda
has railed to the whole world about the "atrocities of the Armenians",
supplying television stations with horrendous pictures of a field
strewn with mutilated bodies. Khojaly is claimed to have been the
"Armenians’ revenge for Sumgait".

Tamerlan Karayev, at one time Chairman of the Supreme Council of the
Azerbaijan Republic, bears witness: "The tragedy was committed by
the authorities of Azerbaijan", and specifically by "someone highly
placed"6.

The Czech journalist Jana Mazalova, who by an oversight of
the Azerbaijanis was included in both of the groups of press
representatives to be shown the "bodies mutilated by the Armenians",
noted a substantial difference in the two cases. When she went to
the scene immediately after the events, Mazalova did not see any
traces of barbarous treatment of the bodies. Yet a couple of days
later the journalists were shown disfigured bodies already "prepared"
for pictures.

Who killed the peaceful inhabitants of Khojaly and then mutilated their
bodies, if the tragedy occurred not in a village taken by Armenians
or on the route of the humanitarian corridor, but on the approaches
to the town of Agdam – on territory fully controlled by the Popular
Front of Azerbaijan?

The independent Azerbaijani cameraman Chingiz Mustafayev, who took
pictures on 28 February and 2 March 1992, had doubts about the official
Azerbaijani version and began his own inquiry. The journalist’s very
first report to the Moscow news agency "D-press" on the possible
complicity of the Azerbaijani side in the crimes cost Mustafayev his
life: he was killed nor far from Agdam, under circumstances that are
still unexplained.

The current President of Azerbaijan, Heydar Aliyev, himself recognized
that Azetbaijan’s "former leadership was also guilty" of events in
Khojaly. Already in April 1992, according to the agency Bilik-Dunyasy,
he had commented as follows: "The bloodshed will be to our advantage.

We should not interfere in the course of events". To whose "advantage"
was the bloodshed is clear to everyone. "Megapolis-Express" wrote:
"It cannot be denied that if the Popular Front of Azerbaijan actually
set far-reaching objectives, they have been achieved. Mutalibov has
been compromised and overthrown, public opinion worldwide has been
shaken, and the Azerbaijanis and their Turkish brethren have believed
in the so-called "genocide of the Azerbaijani people in Khojaly"7.

One other tragic detail. It has become clear since the events that 47
Armenian hostages were already being held on 26 February in "peaceful"
Khojaly, a fact that the Azerbaijani mass media "covering" the tragedy
have failed to mention. After the liberation of Khojaly only 13
hostages (including 6 woman and 1 child) were found there, the other
34 having been taken away by the Azerbaijanis to an unknown location.

The only thing known about them is that they were led from the village
on the night of the operation, but never reached Agdam. There is
still no information concerning what eventually happened to them or
confirming that they continued to be held captive by the Azerbaijanis.

Obviously, those who wanted to create the impression that bodies had
been mutilated by the Armenians first of all disfigured the bodies
of those same Armenian hostages, in order to make it impossible to
identify them. Precisely for that purpose the outer clothing was
removed from many of the bodies and precisely for that reason the
bodies of the unfortunate victims were damaged so badly that they
became unrecognizable.

In the light of the above facts it may confidently be said that the
killing of peaceful inhabitants of the village of Khojaly and of the
Armenian hostages being held there was the work of the Azerbaijani
side, which committed this crime against its own people in the name
of political intrigues and the struggle for power.

__________________________________________ _______

1. "Nezavisimaya gazeta" newspaper, February 1993 2. "Ogonek" magazine,
Nos. 14-15, 1992 3. "Nezavisimaya gazeta" newspaper, 2 April 1992
4. "Novoye vremya" magazine, 6 March 2001 5. "Zerkalo" newspaper, July
1992 6. "Mukhalifat" newspaper, 28 April 1992 7. "Megapolis-Express",
No. 17, 1992

http://www.nkrusa.org/nk_conflict/khojaly.sh

Sukiasyan Was Released

SUKIASYAN WAS RELEASED

os16837.html
19:20:41 – 15/02/2010

Saribek Sukiasyan, the president of the board of Hayeconombank and
the director of the Airarat Mall Artashes Stepanyan have just been
released on signature not to leave the city. They had been detained
since February 12 when the police had broken into the office of SIL
Concern and taken several employees to the police station of Erebuni
precinct, including the president of the board of Hayeconombank
Saribek Sukiasyan. Today was the deadline to issue a

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/country-lrah