Latvian President To Visit Armenia In 2009

LATVIAN PRESIDENT TO VISIT ARMENIA IN 2009

PanARMENIAN.Net
31.01.2009 21:16 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan met with his
Latvian counterpart Valdis Zatlers on the margins of the World Economic
Forum in Davos.

The Presidents discussed bilateral relations, the ways to strengthen
trade and economic ties and cooperation within the European
Neighborhood Policy.

Mr. Zatlers said he looks forward to visiting Armenia this year,
the RA leader’s press office reported.

The Presidents of Armenia and Latvia first met during the 63rd session
of the UN General Assembly in New York.

Armenian Soccer Team Composition For Friendly Match With Estonia Det

ARMENIAN SOCCER TEAM COMPOSITION FOR FRIENDLY MATCH WITH ESTONIA DETERMINED

PanARMENIAN.Net
31.01.2009 21:20 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Jan Poulsen, the coach of the Armenian national
football team, announced the names of 18 players who will meet with
the Estonian team in a friendly match in Cyprus on February 11.

"I do not think that February is a good time for playing because
it’s the period of seasonal practice. Not all players of our team
can go to Cyprus therefore. But attaching importance to this match,
I invited some new players," he said.

Pro-government MP hails Council of Europe body decision on Armenia

Mediamax, Armenia
Jan 28 2009

Pro-government MP hails Council of Europe body decision on Armenia

Yerevan, 28 January: Resolution 1643, approved yesterday at a PACE
[Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe] session, became a
triumph of common sense and a proof of excessiveness of accusations,
according to which the Armenian authorities do no have a political
will.

Member of the Armenian delegation to PACE [and a senior member of the
Armenian Revolutionary Federation – Dashnaktsutyun] Armen Rustamyan
said this in an interview to a Mediamax special correspondent in
Strasbourg.

"The working committee on making changes to Articles 225 and 300 of
the Criminal Code of Armenia, which was set up by the order of the
chairman of the Armenian parliament, caused significant changes in the
mood of PACE MPs and established prerequisites to reconsider the
initial report," the Armenian MP stated.

According to him, "now the ball is in our court and we have to present
proofs of the work realized before the session of the PACE Monitoring
Committee due in late March".

"If the Monitoring Committee makes a decision in late March, according
to which we will have not fulfilled all our commitments, it will be
extremely and almost impossible to prove anything here, and then the
issue on depriving our delegation of the right of vote will again be
put forward in PACE," Armen Rustamyan stated.

"We should try to do something for the issue concerning Armenia not to
be discussed at the spring session of PACE at all, and to do that, we
need consistent and coordinated work not only by the working group and
the parliament, but by all power branches in Armenia," he stated in
the interview to Mediamax.

Assessing the behaviour of the Azerbaijani delegates at the session,
the Armenian MP described it as a "tactical mistake". "It seemed to
them that PACE was going to ‘get rid’ of Armenia, and they decided to
make their contribution to that, but in the end they remained all
alone," Armen Rustamyan stated. "When they talk about their successful
presidential elections, I immediately recall the USSR elections, where
there were no alternatives. Sometimes it seems to our colleagues that
people in Europe do not know how the presidential elections in
Azerbaijan proceeded," he noted.

Peres – Erdogan Confrontation

PERES – ERDOGAN CONFRONTATION
David Essing

IsraCast
spx?ID=1057&t=Peres—Erdogan-Confrontation&am p;play=1
Jan 30 2009
Israel

Israel’s President Shimon Peres Pulls No Punches In Rebuttal Of
Turkish Leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s Condemnation Of Israeli Operation
Against Hamas

Israeli Experts Believe Erdogan Is Bashing Israel To Win Islamist
Votes In Upcoming Turkish Election

IsraCast Comment: Peres Could Have Recalled Turkey’s Past Oppression
Of Armenians & Current Warfare Against Kurds

At the World Economic Forum in Davos, there were fireworks after
Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan again condemned Israel for
its Operation ‘Cast Shield’ against Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Sharing
the stage was Israel’s President Shimon Peres who refuted Erdogan’s
allegations. Also taking part in the discussion were UN Secretary
General Ban Ki-moon and Arab League Secretary General Amr Musa.

‘What would you do if missiles were falling on Istanbul!’ That was the
passionate reaction of President Shimon Peres to the condemnation of
Israel by Turkey’s Prime Minister Erdogan as they collided head-on
at the World Economic Forum in Davos. The Turkish leader had again
castigated the Jewish state for launching its military operation to
halt the Palestinian rocketing of Israeli civilians from the Gaza Strip
that has been going on for eight years. Erdogan’s verbal assaults
have surprised Israel in light of the fact here is what is called
‘the secret strategic alliance’ between the two non-Arab countries
in the Middle East.

Since the Turkish leader’s sharp criticism, tens of thousands of
Israeli tourists have canceled their trips to their favorite resorts in
Turkey. The Turkish leader had also been acting as a mediator between
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Syrian President Assad. Erdogan’s sudden
and what Israel views as totally unjustified condemnation has taken
Jerusalem by surprise. Some Israeli experts say it may be linked to
upcoming elections in Turkey – Erdogan, leader of the Justice and
Development Party, may be trying to garner votes from Islamists by
bashing Israel. This is arousing criticism by Erdogan’s political
rivals back home.

Turkey’s Foreign Minister has been quoted as taking a different
view of the war in Gaza. Turkey’s top diplomat reportedly said
that Hamas should decide whether it wants to carry guns or conduct
politics. Turkish sources are also aware that Erdogan’s allegations
against the Jewish state could backfire.

For example, human rights organizations have long pressured the Jewish
state to lend its voice to the international move to condemn Turkey
for genocide in murdering over an estimated one million Armenians in
1915. But for whatever reason, Israeli governments have refrained from
doing so. Moreover, today Turkey itself shows far less restraint that
Israel in its ongoing confrontation with its own Kurdish population
which seeks autonomy. Turkey also launches cross border raids against
the Kurds and has warned it will go to war to prevent the establishment
of an independent Kurdistan.

http://www.isracast.com/article.a

Azeri Leader Shrugs Off Rights Criticism

AZERI LEADER SHRUGS OFF RIGHTS CRITICISM
By Guy Faulconbridge

Reuters
Jan 30 2009

DAVOS, Switzerland (Reuters) – Azeri President Ilham Aliyev said a
proposal to scrap a two-term limit on his presidency was aimed at
creating more democracy, not keeping him in power indefinitely.

Aliyev accused the West of applying double standards in its criticism
of the referendum due in March on whether to scrap the two-term limit,
a step that could allow the 47-year-old to stay in power long after
his term ends in 2013.

The West criticizes Aliyev for concentrating too much power in his
own hands but he remains popular after years of economic boom and
there is little doubt that the presidency will be extended.

"You will not find any member of the European Union whose leader
cannot be elected as many times as the people want him to be in this
position. Is it democratic? Yes. So the same should be applied to
Azerbaijan," he told Reuters in an interview late on Thursday at the
World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

"It is democratic, so if the people support this or that leader they
have the right to elect him. So I think lifting the restrictions
(on the number of terms) is more democratic than having these
restrictions," he said, speaking in English.

The Aliyev family has governed the oil-producing Caspian country
for most of the last three decades, first by former President Heydar
Aliyev and since 2003, by his son Ilham.

Azerbaijan has one of the world’s fastest growing economies, with
average annual GDP growth of 21.1 percent from 2003-7 and estimated
growth of 10.8 percent last year.

The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe said last
year’s presidential election, won by Aliyev with 89 percent of the
vote, made "considerable progress" but that it fell short of fully
democratic standards.

BIASED CRITICISM

Aliyev dismissed much of the criticism of Azerbaijan’s record on
human rights and democracy.

"If the criticism is justified and when it comes from a respectable
source we are more than ready and willing to discuss it," he
said. "Some of the criticism we sometimes hear from various NGOs
actually does not bother (us) because this criticism is mainly biased."

Aliyev said the West often judged human rights selectively and ignored
major violations in countries where it had geopolitical interests. He
mentioned Armenia as an example.

"The situation with human rights in Azerbaijan is not bad. If you
look at our region you will see that countries in our neighborhood
who brutally violate the elementary human rights of their people have
not become the subject of criticism."

"Sometimes those countries that are considered to be more friendly
or more close or more, how to say it, more associated with the West,
if they do something wrong it is not noticed."

"But if Azerbaijan, which is also friendly to the West but which
pursues its own independent policy, does one percent of what those
other countries do then we immediately become a subject of criticism."

On resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute, one of a handful of
"frozen conflicts" stemming from the collapse of the Soviet Union,
Aliyev said there were still no results.

Ethnic Armenian separatists, backed by Armenia, fought a war in the
1990s to throw off Azerbaijan’s control over Nagorno- Karabakh. An
estimated 30,000 people were killed. A fragile ceasefire is in force
but a peace accord has never been signed.

Discovery’s New Show Plunges Into The Unknown

DISCOVERY’S NEW SHOW PLUNGES INTO THE UNKNOWN

Indiantelevision.com
Jan 30 2009

MUMBAI: Questions and a thirst for knowledge takes Discovery’s explorer
and host Josh Bernstein to lands filled with mystery, hidden treasures
andstories.

Into The Unknown With Josh Bernstein will be aired every Monday on
Discovery from 2 February at 9 pm.

Explorer and educator Bernstein has an appetite for knowledge and
a strong desire to do whatever it takes to unravel mysteries and
explore natural wonders. In each episode he delves into some of the
greatest mysteries on earth and investigates most fascinating stories
such as how did the Anga tribe of Papua New Guinea mummify their dead,
why is the conflict between elephants and humans escalating in Africa
and did the flood of Genesis really happen?.

Discovery director – marketing and communications Rajiv Bakshi says,
"Capturing the imagination of the curious viewers, Into the Unknown
with Josh Bernstein will unravel the world’s greatest mysteries. The
show will take viewers on an extraordinary journey into adventure and
surprise. Each quest sparks new revelations and incredible insights
as Josh takes viewers on a thrilling hunt for answers."

The first episode involves the Search for Noah’s Ark. Did the flood of
Genesis really happen? Was there an actual ark or a man called Noah? He
travels throughout Armenia, Israel, Sicily and Cyprus to investigate a
compelling new theory about the truth behind this extraordinary story.

Another episode examines the Secret Life of Gladiators. The Roman
Gladiators participated in history’s most deadly sport, but does
the Hollywood portrayal of Gladiators bear any resemblance to the
truth? Were they slaves or celebrities? What was their training and
everyday home life like? He travels the former Roman Empire from
Italy to Turkey to Tunisia to find out.

United States And NATO: The Axis Of Genocide

UNITED STATES AND NATO: THE AXIS OF GENOCIDE

Pakistan Daily

ates-and-nato-the-axis-of-genocide.html
Jan 29 2009
Pakistan

What is the world to do about major human rights atrocities and
catastrophes that undeniably do occur today? Certainly, the world
must not accord the great military powers such as the United States,
the NATO states, Russia, and China some fictive right of "humanitarian
intervention" that these powerful states will only abuse and manipulate
in order to justify military aggressions against less powerful states
and peoples for their own selfish interests. There is no need to
alter or update presently existing international law in order to
expand the possibilities for a military "responsibility to protect"
in response to purportedly new exigencies of the day-there are more
than enough international laws and international organizations to
deal with major human rights atrocities and catastrophes going on
around the world today. The demand to do so reflects a political
agenda seeking legal legitimacy, not a deficit in the existing law.

Indeed, behind most of the major human rights atrocities and
catastrophes in the world today humankind has seen in operation
the Machiavellian machinations of the great military powers. So it
should have come as no surprise that the world witnessed outright
genocide inflicted by Serbia and its Milosevic government against the
Kosovar Albanians immediately after the United States and the NATO
states launched their illegal war against Serbia in March of 1999,
a genocide which NATO admittedly anticipated but which in actuality
transpired as the direct result of its aggression. Of course the
nominally Christian United States and NATO states could not care less
about the basic human rights of Kosovar Albanians, most of whom are
Muslims. Soon thereafter, the world witnessed once again outright
genocide inflicted by Indonesia against the people of East Timor
after decades of military and economic support had been provided to
the genocidal military dictatorship ruling Indonesia by the United
States and Britain-"our kind of guy," as the Clinton administration
publicly referred to the genocidaire Suharto when he came to visit
the United States.

Also in this regard, the world must never forget that the indigenous
peoples of Canada, the United States, and Latin America have been
subjected to continuing acts of genocide for over the past 500
years, all in the guise of bringing civilization. How can the United
States and its NATO ally Canada talk about a "humanitarian mission"
in Afghanistan when both states have a long history of practicing
"humanitarian extinction" at home? Despite the slogan and the rhetoric
of "Never again!" that was used with respect to the Nazi Holocaust
against the Jews, toward the start of the twentieth-first century,
genocide has become an increasingly familiar and acceptable tool for
powerful states to wield against weaker states and peoples.

No state has the right or standing under international law to launch
an illegal military attack upon another U.N. member state in the name
of "humanitarian intervention." This principle applies to both the
United States and Canada, which are today continuing to extinguish
the indigenous peoples who live within their imperial domains under
concepts similar to humanitarianism, if not so-labeled. It applies
to Britain’s prolonged colonial occupation of Ireland as well as its
deportation of the people of Diego Garcia. It applies to the outright
genocides Italy inflicted against the peoples of Libya and Ethiopia;
those perpetrated by Spain and Portugal against the indigenous peoples
of Latin America; the monstrous genocide committed by Belgium in the
Congo; and the genocides committed by France in Algeria and Vietnam,
all of whom averred their colonized peoples had been the better for it.

How could NATO member Turkey ever credibly claim some fictive right of
"humanitarian intervention" anywhere given its longstanding campaign
to submerge the Kurds as well as its previous extermination of the
Armenians, a genocide which it still denies today. Only the Nazi-German
genocide against the Jews in Germany and elsewhere has been recognized
for what it was. Yet today a generation later the gullible world is
supposed to believe the NATO fairy-tale that the German Wehrmacht is
now on some type of "humanitarian" mission in Afghanistan. The wanton
aggression by the U.S.-U.K. and their "Coalition of the Willing"
against Iraq in the name of bringing human rights and democracy has
resulted in four million refugees, over a million Iraqi deaths,
and the wholesale destruction of the country’s infrastructure –
outright genocide.

The United States and its NATO Alliance constitute the greatest
collection of genocidal states ever assembled in the entire history of
the world. If anything the United Nations Organization and its member
states bear a "responsibility to protect" the U.S. and NATO’s intended
victims from their repeated aggressions as they should have done for
Haiti, Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, and now Palestine. The
United States and the NATO Alliance together with their de facto
allies such as Israel constitute the real Axis of Genocide in the
modern world. Humanity bears a "responsibility to protect" the very
future existence of the world from the United States and NATO.

http://www.daily.pk/world/americas/9266-united-st
www.daily.pk

Turkey Knows That Obama May Recognize Armenian Genocide

TURKEY KNOWS THAT OBAMA MAY RECOGNIZE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

PanARMENIAN.Net
29.01.2009 15:51 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The recent developments, specifically the war in
South Ossetia, resulted in Russia’s attempts to exclude Georgia from
regional projects. In this context, Turkish-Armenian relations acquire
special significance, an Armenian expert said.

"The thaw between Yerevan and Ankara is much spoken about. 2009 is
mentioned as the year of reconciliation. Nevertheless, we should not
forget that the EU is to make a decision on Turkey’s accession bid in
October or November 2009. Under the circumstances, it’s natural that
Ankara pretends willingness to normalize relations with Armenia,"
turcologist Artak Shakaryan told a PanARMENIAN.Net reporter.

Turkish Foreign Minister Ali Babacan’s statements that the problems
between Armenia and Turkey can be resolved 2009 should not be taken
for granted, according to him.

"Ankara knows that April 24 is not far off and that new U.S. President
can recognize the Armenian Genocide. Turkey tries to persuade the
international community to refrain from recognition of the Genocide
alleging that Yerevan and Ankara are close to reconciliation. This
is Turkey’s diplomacy," Mr. Shakaryan said.

Edward Sharmazanov: Resolution 1643 Was The Success Of The Republic

EDWARD SHARMAZANOV: RESOLUTION 1643 WAS THE SUCCESS OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
Lena Badeyan

"Radiolur"
28.01.2009 16:36

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) adopted
three resolutions on Armenia within a year. Common citizens cannot
know all the provisions and requirements of those resolutions, but
their numbers (1609 and 1620) are well-known.

Yesterday PACE adopted another resolution on Armenia (1643). The
attitude towards it was very controversial. Some described it as
the victory of the authorities, others said it was the defeat of the
opposition. "It was simply the success of the Republic of Armenia,"
Press Secretary of the Republican Party of Armenia, MP Edward
Sharmazanov told a press conference today.

The success of Resolution 1643 was that the points on suspending the
Armenian delegation’s voting right and the existence of political
prisoners in Armenia were expelled from the text. Edward Sharmazanov
explained the success with the political will demonstrated by the
Armenian authorities.

"Some said the authorities arranged a deal, gave different promises
or, as one of the representatives of the opposition said, "duped"
the Europeans. I should say that this is not true, and it was not the
European partners that urged us to implement reforms," Sharmazanov
stated.

ANKARA: Turkish Officials To Hold Contacts In Davos On IMF, Mideast,

TURKISH OFFICIALS TO HOLD CONTACTS IN DAVOS ON IMF, MIDEAST, ARMENIA

Hurriyet
Jan 27 2009
Turkey

Turkish officials are expected to hold a series meetings on various
issues from the IMF, to Armenia and the Middle East conflict during
the Davos meetings due to start on Wednesday. (UPDATED)

A meeting is likely to be held with the Armenian foreign minister,
as a step towards normalizing relations between the two neighboring
countries, Turkish Foreign Minister might Ali Babacan told at a press
conference prior to his departure for Davos on Tuesday. Babacan said,
however, there is no schedule has been confirmed for the possible
meeting.

Turkey and Armenia restored dialogue after President Abdullah Gul paid
a visit to Yerevan last September. The two neighboring countries do
not have any diplomatic relations and the border is closed because
of Armenia’s invasion of 20 percent of Azerbaijani territory.

The leaders of Turkey, Armenia and Azerbaijan would also be attending
the Davos meetings.

The invitation-only World Economic Forum is being held from Jan. 28
through to Feb. 1 in Davos-Klosters. More than 40 heads of state have
reportedly confirmed they will attend the gathering of leaders from
businesses, unions, and non-governmental organizations. Items on the
agenda include the global economic turmoil and climate change.

PM TO ATTEND MIDEAST SESSION

Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan will attend the session of
"Gaza: The Case for Middle East Peace". Israeli President Shimon
Peres will also attend the session as a speaker.

Erdogan is expected to stress that he did not target the Israeli
people in his harsh criticism against the Gaza operation and say that
"Anti-Semitism is a crime against humanity just as Islamophobia is,"
in his speech at the session, Hurriyet daily reported on Tuesday.

Secretary General of the Arab League and Washington Post columnist
David Ignatius will also attend the session.

The Turkish government played an active role to reduce tensions in
the Middle East and cut a truce after Israel’s three-week long air
and ground assault on Gaza which killed more than 1,300 people.

However the government came under fire due the harsh rhetoric it used
in criticizing Israel.

Erdogan also will meet with Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin on
the first of the Davos meetings. The two leaders are expected to hold
talks on the energy issues.

IMF PROCESS

Another issue that will dominate the Turkish officials’ agenda will be
the talks on the new loan with the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Turkey and the IMF suspended loan talks for 10 days, and Turkish
officials are scheduled to hold talks with fund executives during the
Davos meeting. The IMF delegation, currently in Turkey for the talks,
is expected to leave Ankara soon.

Economy Minister Mehmet Simsek will meet with IMF officials but did
not give further details on his contacts. Erdogan said he will meet
with the deputy managing director of the IMF.