ARS-WUSA: ARS of Western USA Concludes Year Long Strategic Planning

CONTACT: Talar Aintablian, (818) 500-1343
[email protected]

PRESS RELEASE

ARS of Western USA Concludes its Year-Long Strategic Planning Efforts

The ARS Strategic Planning Committee’s series of workshops concluded with
its final meeting on Thursday, March 25, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. at the ARS of
Western USA Regional Headquarters. The workshop was headed by Armen
Aprahamian, a specialist in the field, and also included the presence of ARS
Central Executive Board member, Nova Hindoyan, and ARS Regional Executive
Chairperson, Sossie Poladian.

The workshop commenced with Nyree Derderian, Chairperson of the Strategic
Planning Committee, offering her welcoming remarks to those in attendance
and expressing appreciation for their interest and support of the ARS. After
indicating that previous workshops assessed the current state of the ARS and
its future goals, she made clear the focus of the present meeting: to seek
methods that would result in the realization of foreseen organizational
goals.

Committee member Maral Poladian then provided a brief presentation regarding
the previous workshops. She brought attention to the questionnaire answers
provided by chapters and made mention of the committee’s conclusions
regarding ARS chapters and their respective communities, which will be
utilized in future organizational planning efforts. She also discussed the
current state of chapters, providing helpful insight and highlighting the
importance of planning. One such planning effort would include attracting
youth to join the organizational ranks of the ARS.

Thereafter, the workshop was led by Armen Aprahamian, who emphasized the
importance of eight strategic priority points that should take precedence in
the future planning efforts of the ARS. They include:

* Recruitment of Young Volunteers
* Linkage and Collaboration
* Programs
* Training and Support
* Organizational Effectiveness
* Balanced Approach
* Public Education and Outreach
* Chapter Infrastructure

After a thorough examination of each of the above-mentioned points, those
present divided into eight groups, each of which focused on one strategic
priority point. The groups then presented suggestions for each strategic
direction and a question and answer period followed.

The workshop concluded with the Regional Executive expressing its
thankfulness to the Strategic Planning Committee for their hard work and
determined efforts. The Regional Executive’s liaison to the Strategic
Planning Committee, Maco Setrakian, expressed her thanks to those who
participated for their helpful insights, to Armen Aprahamian for leading the
workshop, and to committee members Mourad Topalian, Nyree Derderian, Maral
Poladian, and Talin Hindoyan.

On behalf of the Regional Executive, Chairperson Sossie Poladian presented
Mr. Aprahamian with a plaque and pen as a symbol of appreciation.

The strategic planning workshops concluded that important efforts that lie
ahead, which will lead the organization into its next century of service.

###

ARS of Western USA, Inc.
Regional Office
517 W. Glenoaks Blvd.
Glendale, CA 91202
Tel. (818) 500-1343
Fax: (818) 242-3732
E-Mail: [email protected]

Turkish-Armenian Academic Criticizes Turkey’s Policy Of Denial

TURKISH-ARMENIAN ACADEMIC CRITICIZES TURKEY’S POLICY OF DENIAL

Tert.am
12.04.10

Thorny relations between Turkey and Armenia and the Armenian Genocide
in 1915 were the subject of a tense live TV debate last week between
two controversial figures.

"I attended the program not because I am Armenian, but because I am a
citizen of Turkey," said Turkish-Armenian academic Sevan NiÅ~_anyan,
who appeared on a Haberturk television program along with Yusuf
Halacoglu, the ex-president of the Turkish Historical Society.

"I work and produce for this country," NiÅ~_anyan told the Hurriyet
Daily News & Economic Review in an interview. "All that affects this
country’s destiny is my concern, not only the Armenian issue."

During the program, Halacoglu said he used archival documents as
the basis for his case that the events of 1915 in no way constituted
genocide – an argument that NiÅ~_anyan dismissed as "official Turkish
history."

NiÅ~_anyan confirmed that he received threatening messages after the
program, but dismissed them, saying he does not really care about
such threats. Asked about whether he might face the same risk as
Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink, who was assassinated Feb. 19,
2007, he said: "I do not believe that a spontaneous murder could be
committed in this country; it is not the right milieu for that.

Threats are a part of my life and I know very well where they come
from."

The academic said he was initially hesitant about being on the program,
but then decided to participate after all. "[If it were not Halacoglu
on that program] it would have been Yalcın Kucuk. I had to pick the
best of the worst," he said. "I attended because it was time that
somebody stood up against the lies. I defended historical facts that
are well-known by the whole world."

Despite the tension between the two countries, NiÅ~_anyan said he
believes the problems could be overcome if the Turkish and Armenian
peoples establish a dialogue, adding that even the Turkish public
itself is now questioning the events of 1915. "Turkish society is a
conscientious society. The problem is Ankara," he said.

Gateway to hope and heartache

Boston Globe, MA
April 11 2010

Gateway to hope and heartache
First a point of entry for immigrants, later a makeshift prison, this
East Boston building is slated to be razed

By Andrew Ryan
Globe Staff / April 11, 2010

Tunney Lee arrived in America on a dreary day in 1938, a 7-year-old at
the railing of a steamship gazing up at the Custom House Tower, an
ivory-colored beacon soaring above Boston.

If seeing the city’s tallest skyscraper filled Lee with hope, a
low-slung building on an East Boston wharf reminded him who he was: a
boy, just 3 feet 9 inches, emigrating from China, the target of
America’s strictest immigration quotas. After a 59-question
interrogation by immigration officers, he signed his name with an X.

`I don’t remember being scared,” said Lee, now 78. `But I must have been.”

Like tens of thousands of immigrants over three decades, Lee survived
the intense scrutiny of the East Boston Immigration Station, emerged
onto nearby Marginal Street, and started a new life in the United
States. For untold others, the building represented the antithesis of
freedom. In the hysteria after Pearl Harbor, it became a detention
center for local Germans and Japanese, a gateway to faraway internment
camps.

The setting for so much human drama has since endured a half-century
of neglect and van dalism. Decaying and sinking into the harbor, the
yellow brick building has been targeted for demolition by its owner,
the Massachusetts Port Authority. But before Massport can unleash the
wrecking ball, the Boston Landmarks Commission is reviewing the
structure’s historic significance. Its findings, expected at the end
of this month, could prompt city officials to delay or halt the
razing.

`It’s our Ellis Island,” said Lee, a professor who teaches urban
planning at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. `I think of the
memories of that building in terms of the people. The ghosts. That
period of America’s history and Boston’s history has been forgotten.”

The building closed as an immigration station in 1954 and repeatedly
changed owners afterward, housing a radiator factory and a storeroom
for TWA Airlines. Eventually it became a dumping place for junk.

Today the structure is a putrid and rotting shell that reeks of urine
and the dank odor of a flooded basement. Steady drips of water echo as
they land on a fetid mattress covered in chunks of plaster. Pigeons
flutter in rafters and rusted fluorescent lights sway in the salty air
that blows through broken windows. Graffiti scrawled in red spray
paint says, `Tear it down!!”

Evidence of the building’s original function can be seen on brick
pillars, scribbled in what looks like pencil. `Henry O’Toole, Dublin,
Ireland, 1937,” says one note. `Manuel G. Orfao, Portugal,” reads
another. A third says: `H.A. Calderon, Buenos Aires.” Others mention
Moscow, Rotterdam, Venezuela, and Dundee, Scotland.

`There are a lot of stories that went on at that place that need to be
told ‘ that deserve to be told,” said Vincent J. Cannato, a professor
of history at the University of Massachusetts Boston.

The stories include that of Alice Gertrude Chase, a 19-year-old
English woman who jilted her husband-to-be in 1920 when she changed
her mind on a steamship from Liverpool; of two Armenian girls ‘
Vartouhi Hovsepian and Gulenia Kehyayan ‘ who arrived in 1926, and had
helped weave a rug used in the East Room of the White House during
President Calvin Coolidge’s administration.

There were well-known names who came through its doors, including the
infamous Italian huckster Charles Ponzi, who passed through in 1934 on
his way out of the country. But most were anonymous faces who faded
into the fabric of America, and changed it. Their stories became ours.

`Immigration is human work,” Mary H. Ward, then Boston’s district
immigration commissioner, said in 1935. `People trust us with their
most guarded secrets.”

The building had a cafeteria, dormitories for men and women, a roof
garden for exercise, and a player piano. The Chinese, owing to the
prejudices of the time, were made to use separate quarters and
washrooms. Two large rooms with benches hosted interminable card
games, with `black and white, yellow and brown” gathered around
tables together even though `they can’t speak a word to each other,”
according to a 1922 account, which described the facility as the
`vestibule” where immigrants knocked for entry into `the Great
American house.”

The role of the East Boston Immigration Station differed significantly
from New York’s Ellis Island, which served as the portal for more than
12 million immigrants. The East Boston station opened almost three
decades later, in 1920, when the tidal wave of newcomers had begun to
ebb. The early surge of Irish and Germans had long passed, and war
staunched the later flood from Southern and Eastern Europe. By then,
US immigration policy emphasized restrictions and quotas.

In Boston, inspectors processed immigrants at steamship docks and only
brought to the immigration station those who required a secondary
interview or had issues with their paperwork or other problems,
according to Marian L. Smith, a long-time historian for the federal
immigration service. Of the 230,000 legal immigrants granted entry
through Boston during the station’s lifetime, perhaps 50,000 passed
through the facility. Those totals don’t include the countless
stowaways, those who were turned away, or deportees.

And then World War II changed everything.

On April 1, 1941, authorities in Boston Harbor seized two ships ‘ one
Italian, one German ‘ and imprisoned the crews in the station. Boston
immigration officials sent word weeks later to the US Justice
Department about plans for half-inch thick metal bars to be welded on
the station’s windows and skylights, the installation of steel doors
with `bullet proof, prison-type hardware,” and the building of a
chain-link cage over the roof. Boston immigration officers were told
to expect `a large number of aliens.”

The attack on Pearl Harbor prompted the arrest of some local Japanese,
Italians, and Germans, who were dragged into East Boston for temporary
imprisonment.

One was Karl Otto Heinrich Lange, a 39-year-old German-born physicist
and renowned meteorologist at Harvard’s Blue Hill Observatory who had
been living in the United State since 1931. Federal agents also
grabbed a German-born artist named Paul Lameyer out of his Newbury
Street apartment, even though he had lived here for almost two
decades.

`This wasn’t invented at Guantanamo. This has happened before, many
times,” said Lameyer’s grandson, Randy Houser, of Charleston, S.C.,
who has visited the immigration station. `In your city, this is where
it happened. This is the place where people were held without habeas
corpus.”

Lameyer spent several months in East Boston before bouncing to
internment camps in Long Island, Maryland, Tennessee, and finally
North Dakota. He was released in May 1945 and died in 1960. His
etchings of bucolic New England still hang in the Childs Gallery on
Newbury Street.

`It’s one of those things we probably want to forget,” said Houser,
who has spent a decade obtaining records about his grandfather’s
ordeal. `I think that’s why it’s been kind of a secret for 50 years.”

The same fate ensnared Max Ebel, a 23-year-old German-born furniture
maker living in Jamaica Plain seized in September 1942. Ebel, who died
in 2007, reluctantly told his family about his four months in East
Boston: the Japanese man he helped save who was keeled over a toilet,
bleeding from gashes on his neck where he had tried to slit his own
throat; the gift of a rosary from a fellow detainee who had lost his
faith; his vivid memory of breathing the sea air in the fenced
exercise yard on the roof.

`He said he felt sort of like a caged animal when he walked on the
top,” said his daughter Karen Ebel of New London, N.H. She said of
the building, `I don’t think it should be torn down.”

Massport, which took ownership in 1985, wants to raze the structure
`for safety reasons,” said spokesman Matthew Brelis, and would
probably use the land for boat repair and maintenance. The agency has
hired a consultant to document the building’s historic significance;
Massport would not make the consultant available for interviews.

Some East Boston residents are fighting to save the immigration
station. Other locals say the decrepit building is too far gone.

Tunney Lee says saving the structure may be impractical.

`But it would be important to leave something on that site,” Lee
said. `They shouldn’t forget that a substantial number of people
passed through there, ancestors of people who live here now.

`Ellis Island became a monument ‘ you can take a ferry out to see
it,” he continued. `But East Boston sort of faded out of everybody’s
memory.”

Ann Silvio of the Globe Staff contributed to this report.

setts/articles/2010/04/11/gateway_to_hope_and_hear tache/?page=full

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachu

Sargsyan, Medvedev discuss possibility of scheduling a meeting

Aysor, Armenia
April 10 2010

Sargsyan, Medvedev discuss possibility of scheduling a meeting

Armenia’s President Serzh Sargsyan discussed during a telephone
conversation with his Russian counterpart Dmirty Medvedev Friday a
possibility of scheduling a new meeting, a spokesperson for State
Administration said.

President Sargsyan once again referred to the tragic and deadly blasts
in the Moscow metro, resulted in dozens of deaths, and expressed his
condolences. Parties discussed some items, recent happenings in the
world; Armenian President Sargsyan thanked Medvedev for invitation to
participate in the ceremonies in occasion of the upcoming 65th
anniversary of the end of the WWII.

Karabakh Conflict To Be Resolved Through Political Dialogue: Palesti

KARABAKH CONFLICT TO BE RESOLVED THROUGH POLITICAL DIALOGUE: PALESTINIAN FM

news.am
April 8 2010
Armenia

Palestinians opted political dialogue as the best way of solving
their problems and hopefully Azerbaijan will settle its conflict with
Armenia same way, Palestinian Foreign Minister Riyad al-Maliki told
in an interview with Trend News.

"Azerbaijan always could look into ways how to promote better
relationships between the conflicting countries in the region,
and setting up seminars, conferences in Baku or any other cities of
Azerbaijan. It could really bring experts from the region in order
to see how it can produce some rapprochement between countries when
it comes to different conflicting matters," he told Azerbaijani
news agency.

Al-Maliki also noted that Palestine shows solidarity with Azerbaijani
people "when it comes to their territorial integrity and sovereignty
as a country."

ISTANBUL: Erdogan set to have crucial Armenia talks in Washington

erdogan-set-to-have-crucial-armenia-talks-in-washi ngton.html

TODAY’S ZAMAN WITH REUTERS ANKARA
10 April 2010, Saturday
Erdogan set to have crucial Armenia talks in Washington

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is expected to meet with US
President Barack Obama during his visit to Washington next week .

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is scheduled to arrive in the US
capital on Sunday evening to take part in an international nuclear
security conference, yet moves to breathe new life into efforts by
Armenia and Turkey to bury a century of hostility and open their
common border will dominate his talks on the sidelines of the summit,
which will take place on Monday and Tuesday.

Erdogan will be accompanied by Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu and
Energy Minister Taner Yıldız during US President Barack Obama’s
47-country Nuclear Security Summit (NSS).

Obama, a staunch supporter of Turkish-Armenian efforts to normalize
their relations, will have bilateral talks with Armenian President
Serzh Sarksyan, while Erdogan will also have separate bilateral talks
with Sarksyan on the sidelines of the meeting. Although no exact time
or venue has been set for a meeting between Erdogan and Obama, Turkish
officials told Today’s Zaman on Friday that such a meeting was likely
to take place.

As for a trilateral meeting between Erdogan, Obama and Sarskyan, the
same officials said Ankara wants to see the outcome of a Friday visit
to the Azerbaijani capital of Baku by Foreign Ministry Undersecretary
Ambassador Feridun Sinirlioglu before attempting to schedule such a
meeting.

Armenia and Turkey signed accords in October of last year designed to
overcome the legacy of the World War I killings of Anatolian Armenians
under the Ottoman Empire. Last week, Erdogan said Turkey was returning
its ambassador to the United States, having withdrawn him a month
earlier in protest against a US congressional committee labeling the
killings as genocide.

Addressing a news conference in Ankara on Thursday, Foreign Minister
Davutoglu made no mention of the coming meeting in Washington but said
he believed the two countries would soon overcome their difficulties.
`In the following weeks, we hope to normalize Turkish-Armenian
relations by pursuing the process in the right direction and in its
own nature,’ Davutoglu said.

Under the accords, Armenia and Turkey agreed to establish diplomatic
ties and open the border within two months of parliamentary approval.
But the atmosphere has soured in the past few months, raising doubt
over when they would be ratified. Sarksyan said recently that the
Armenian Parliament would ratify the accords just after the Turkish
Parliament.

The deal would bring big economic gains to poor, landlocked Armenia.
Turkey would burnish its credentials as a potential EU entry state and
boost its clout in the South Caucasus, a region crisscrossed by
pipelines carrying oil and gas to the West.
Consultations in Baku ahead of Washington talks

The protocols face opposition from Turkey’s fellow-Muslim ally
Azerbaijan, which wants to see progress over its breakaway region of
Nagorno-Karabakh. Azerbaijan, an oil and gas exporter, lost control
over Nagorno-Karabakh when Christian ethnic Armenians backed by
Armenia broke away as the Soviet Union collapsed.

Ambassador Sinirlioglu went to Baku on Friday following his talks in
Yerevan on Wednesday. He traveled to the Armenian capital as Erdogan’s
special envoy and met with Sarksyan. Erdogan also sent a letter to
Sarksyan containing a message that an agreement would better serve the
interests of the two countries, especially when compared to the cost
of failure to achieve peace.

Following Sinirlioglu’s visit to Yerevan, the need to pay a visit to
the Azerbaijani capital emerged, diplomatic sources, speaking on
condition of anonymity, told Today’s Zaman.

In Baku, Sinirlioglu met with Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar
Mammadyarov before his meeting with Azerbaijani President Ilham
Aliyev. In addition to conveying his assessments of the Armenian
capital and the signals he received from the Armenian side to
Azerbaijani officials, Sinirlioglu was expected to `test the waters’
in the Azerbaijani capital ahead of the summit in Washington as Ankara
doesn’t want Baku to feel `excluded’ due to the fact that no
Azerbaijani official will be attending the summit, diplomatic sources
said. Ankara will decide whether to attempt to organize a trilateral
meeting among Armenian, US and Turkish leaders according to the
signals it receives from Baku.

The same sources highlighted that Azerbaijan was not invited to the
nuclear summit even though Armenia was invited. Although Washington
said the invitations were sent based on `certain mechanical criteria,’
Ankara conveyed its uneasiness to Washington at the highest level over
the absence of an invitation to Baku, the sources said.

In a recent interview with Reuters, Deputy Prime Minister Cemil Cicek
once more made the government’s position on the issue clear, saying
Turkey wants Armenian forces in Nagorno-Karabakh to pull back from the
front lines. It also wants Armenia to correct a ruling by its
constitutional court, which in January had endorsed the protocols but
added that the state had a duty to pursue the international
recognition of the killings of Armenians in 1915 as genocide.

http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-206993-100-

BAKU: Azerbaijani MP: Armenia Is Still "Breathing" Thanks To Iran

AZERBAIJANI MP: ARMENIA IS STILL "BREATHING" THANKS TO IRAN

Today
April 8 2010
Azerbaijan

I do not think that Iran can put pressure on Armenia to de-occupy
Azerbaijani lands, Member of the Azerbaijani Milli Majlis (Parliament)
Azay Guliyev said. He was commenting on Iranian Foreign Minister
Manouchehr Mottaki’s statement that Iran has presented its version
of settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict to Baku and Yerevan.

"Lately, negotiations on the Karabakh peace process have considerably
intensified, and some countries have begun to voice their proposals
for mediation in this conflict. In this context, Iran in its turn
also makes its proposals to resolve this territorial dispute. But,
unfortunately, there are two factors because of which Tehran can not
be an impartial mediator in settlement of the Karabakh conflict,"
the MP said.

"First, we already have bitter experience of Tehran’s initiatives
to resolve the Karabakh conflict. At one time, in the early 90’s,
when Iran tried to take the lead in the negotiating process, Shusha
was occupied."

"Secondly, Iran renders huge aid to Armenia. If it had not been for
Tehran, Yerevan would have been in much more difficult situation
today. Most of the food, energy, construction materials and other
goods are shipped to Armenia from and also via Iran. In other words,
Armenia still "breathes" thanks to Tehran," the MP added.

"At the same time, I believe that Azerbaijan will never reject
mediation of any country that is able to influence Armenia in
de-occupation of the Azerbaijani territories. But, in my opinion,
Iran would never exert pressure on Armenia to free the occupied
lands, while Tehran does have such levers. Therefore, I see Tehran’s
initiative to mediate between Baku and Yerevan as an attempt "to sit
in a moving train" The state which openly declares the importance
of unity of Muslims does not need to help Armenia who has occupied
Azerbaijan’s territories," Guliyev noted.

"Banants" overcame the barriers of "Shirak"

"BANANTS" OVERCAME THE BARRIERS OF "SHIRAK"

Aysor
April 7 2010
Armenia

On the quarter final of the Armenian Cup "Banants" football team of
Yerevan took a privilege over Gyumri’s "Shirak" team. As a result
of two victories the general result of both teams "Banants" took a
permit for the semifinal.

Samvel Melqonyan showed a good game two times, and once Denira Ortega.

By the way Samvel became an author of a head-trick.

High School For Public Administration Of Kehl And German University

HIGH SCHOOL FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION OF KEHL AND GERMAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA SIGN COOPERATION AGREEMENT

Arminfo
2010-04-07 20:02:00

ArmInfo. Today the High School for Public Administration of Kehl
(Hochschule fur offentliche Verwaltung) and the German University of
Armenia signed a cooperation agreement.

Rector of the School Paul Witt said that the agreement stipulates
exchange of students and teachers in the framework of European Behavior
and Public Administration master’s program. He said that his School is
interested in cooperating with Armenia. He hopes that this agreement
will pave the way for enlarged cooperation. Witt quoted Henry Ford as
saying: "Coming together is a beginning, keeping together is progress,
working together is success." Witt pointed out that the High School
for Public Administration of Kehl has a big experience of cooperation
with universities worldwide. He is sure that the cooperation with
Armenia will be fruitful. The program needs serious financing but
Witty hopes for sponsors’ support. "We are ready to do our best to
put this agreement into practice," Witt said.

German University of Armenia was established in 2005. In the past
years it has held different training courses and studies and has
established cooperation with many German universities: University of
Kassel, CBJM, University of Erlangen-Nurnberg.

BAKU: Armenian Church Leader Mulls Baku Visit

ARMENIAN CHURCH LEADER MULLS BAKU VISIT

news.az
April 7 2010
Azerbaijan

Garegin ll Armenian Catholicos Garegin II is expected to reply to an
invitation to attend a Baku religious summit in the next few days.

Russian Patriarch Kirill and Allashukur Pashazade, chair of the
Caucasus Muslims Department, have both invited the Catholicos in their
capacity as co-chairs of the CIS Interreligious Council, according
to Rahima Dadasheva, spokeswoman for the Caucasus Muslims Department.

‘Moscow is holding negotiations in this regard, so we do not have
exact information. Anyway, it will be clear in the next few days,’
Dadasheva said.

She said that preparations were well in hand for the summit, which
will be held on 26-27 April.

‘The summit will involve more than 300 guests from over 40 countries,
including representatives of all religious centres of the world, world
religious leaders, and representatives of international organizations.

The summit is devoted to globalization, religion and traditional
values.’