Opposition MP warns Pashinyan against signing any ‘controversial document’ without people’s knowledge

Panorama, Armenia
May 20 2021

Lawmaker Edmon Marukyan, the leader of the opposition Bright Armenia faction, on Thursday reacted to the reports that the Armenian authorities are negotiating a new “controversial document” with Azerbaijan and Russia, and caretaker Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan is going to sign it.

"The authorities told lies and manipulated the people during the 44 days of war, assuring that we were winning, but in the end it turned out that not only did we not win, but also we were crushed and defeated,” he wrote on Facebook.

He underlined the Armenian authorities assured the people that no decision would be made to resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict without taking into account their opinion, however in the end it became clear that the prime minister had secretly signed a document, which even his teammates were not aware of.

“And what is happening now? Nobody knows. Having failed to learn lessons from the war, the authorities are again in shadow negotiations, again not telling the people what awaits them. People are in uncertainty or ignorant. Residents of Syunik, Gegharkunik, Tavush, Vayots Dzor and Ararat Provinces do not know what may happen to them tomorrow.

“I urge acting Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and members of the ruling force to talk to the people and explain in detail the actual course of events, not to tell lies, hide anything, reach shadow agreements or sign any controversial document without people’s knowledge,” Marukyan said. 

Lithuanian parliamentarians express concern over reports of growing tension between Armenia and Azerbaijan

Public Radio of Armenia

Members of the Seimas Group for Inter-Parliamentary Relations with the Republic of Armenia adopted the statement on the situation on the border between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

The statement notes that Lithuania is closely monitoring the situation on the border between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

The parliamentarians expressed their concern about reports of rising tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan with reports of an incursion into the Armenian territory.

The Members of the Seimas Group for Inter-Parliamentary Relations with the Republic of Armenia urge all parties to respect the ceasefire agreement achieved on November 10 fully and to continue to negotiate a permanent and peaceful settlement. The call is issued for stopping all action that would undermine the ceasefire and escalate tensions.

The expectation is voiced that Azerbaijan will immediately pull back its forces.

Russian foreign ministry spox comments on removal of dome of Shushi’s Ghazanchetsots Cathedral by Azerbaijan

Save

Share

 13:12,

YEREVAN, MAY 21, ARMENPRESS. The preservation of the historical-cultural heritage in Nagorno Karabakh and adjacent territories is being regularly discussed in contacts of the Russian side with both official Baku and official Yerevan, Russian foreign ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said during a weekly press briefing.

Asked what is Russia’s reaction, as an OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chair country, to the removal of the dome of Shushi’s Ghazanchetsots Cathedral by Azerbaijan under the pretext of “renovations”, which in fact distorted the church’s Armenian architectural look, Zakharova reminded that Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov discussed the issue during his meetings with the Armenian and Azerbaijani counterparts.

“In particular, it has been discussed during Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov’s working visits to Armenia and Azerbaijan in early May. We support quick organization of UNESCO mission in the region, are working within the frames of the OSCFE Minsk Group Co-Chairmanship, and the statement made by the Co-Chairs this year on April 13 says: “Protection and preservation of religious and cultural heritage is in the list of those issues which requires additional efforts by Azerbaijan and Armenia””, Zakharova said.

 

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Military attachés accredited to Armenia visit Syunik province

Save

Share

 13:35,

YEREVAN, MAY 21, ARMENPRESS. Armenia’s defense ministry has organized a visit for the military attachés accredited to Armenia to Syunik province aimed at getting acquainted with the situation caused by the recent incursion of the Azerbaijani armed forces into the Armenian territory, the defense ministry told Armenpress.

The representatives of the Armenian Armed Forces introduced the situation and the developments to the military attachés, the actions taken by the Armenian side and responded to their questions.

Accompanied by the Armenian servicemen, the military attachés visited the area near the Sev Lake, recorded the presence of the Azerbaijani troops in the territory of Armenia and observed the deployment of the Armenian and Azerbaijani forces in the area.

 

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Armenia’s ombudsman seeks support to advance concept of security zone around Syunik and Gegharkunik

Panorama, Armenia

Armenia’s Human Rights Defender (Ombudsman) Arman Tatoyan has urged all government agencies, MPs, the competent public and political organizations and specialists to support his efforts to advance the concept of creating a security zone around Syunik and Gegharkunik Provinces, along the border with Azerbaijan.

“I appeal to all the bodies of our country, the deputies involved in the delegations of international instances, the competent public and political structures and specialists to support Armenia’s human rights defender to advance the concept of creating a security zone around Syunik and Gegharkunik, along the border sections with Azerbaijan,” he said in a statement on Friday.

“I also address this proposal and appeal to all of our powerful Diaspora structures and individuals. We will provide the necessary facts and justifications for this purpose.

“The security zone is necessary to guarantee the rights of the border residents of the Republic of Armenia, and all of the citizens of our country.

“Near Syunik and Gegharkunik villages, there should be no Azerbaijani soldiers, nor should there be any flags or signs on the roads between Syunik communities.

“We must work together and with concrete steps, and with a united force, together fight against the fatal challenges we face, to fight for our rights and for the security of our country,” the statement reads. 

Macron calls for immediate withdrawal of Azerbaijani troops from Armenia’s sovereign territory

Macron calls for immediate withdrawal of Azerbaijani troops from Armenia's sovereign territory

Save

Share

 00:35,

YEREVAN, MAY 14, ARMENPRESS. Acting Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan had a telephone conversation with French President Emanuel Macron on the latter's initiative. The Public Relations Department of the Prime Minister's Office told Armenpress that the Armenian and French leaders discussed the alarming situation created by the Azerbaijani armed forces invading Armenia's sovereign territory in Syunik region and the steps taken to resolve it.

The French President expressed his support to the Armenian authorities and the Armenian people in the peaceful settlement of the issue. Emanuel Macron reaffirmed France's commitment to the territorial integrity of the Republic of Armenia, stressed the need for the immediate withdrawal of the Azerbaijani armed forces from the sovereign territory of Armenia.

Nikol Pashinyan thanked the President of France for his constant attention and friendly attitude towards Armenia and the Armenian people.

Emanuel Macron stressed that France is ready to "contribute to the solution of the challenges facing Armenia, the development and progress of our country."


Armenian army stopped two more provocations, says Defense Ministry

MediaMax, Armenia

Yerevan /Mediamax/. Armenian Ministry of Defense today has reported that the Azerbaijani armed forces "carried out two more provocations against the sovereign territory of the Republic of Armenia, trying to make positional advances in the border areas of Vardenis and Sisian.”

“In both cases, the Armenian Armed Forces took corresponding action and stopped the advances, demanding that the Azerbaijani troops leave immediately and return to their starting positions. 

The Defense Ministry of Armenia considers the actions undertaken by Azerbaijan since May 12 to be an open provocation. To avoid unpredictable developments, the Defense Ministry urges the Azerbaijani troops to return to their starting positions immediately and refrain from attempts to encroach on the sovereign territory of the Republic of Armenia.”

Armenia After The Parliamentary Elections – Analysis

Eurasia Review
May 6 2021

By Emil Avdaliani

On June 20, snap parliamentary elections will be held in Armenia. The move will ease tensions in the country but will fail to end political divisions and solve structural troubles such as poor economic situation, weak judiciary, and the fragile army.

The decision to hold elections followed months of protests when all the former presidents of Armenia, the current president Armen Sarkissian, leadership of the Armenian Church and large parts of the top leadership of the armed forces acted in concert to oppose the Pashinyan government. They all blame him for the country’s unexpected defeat in the war with Azerbaijan in 2020, as a result of which Yerevan had to cede most of the Azerbaijani territory it has occupied since the 1990s, including parts of the mostly Armenian populated Nagorno-Karabakh.

Pashinyan, a protagonist of the 2018 Velvet Revolution, enjoyed widespread popularity in the first two years of his rule. However, expectations for fundamental changes proved to be too high given Armenia’s weak state institutions, polarized political culture, and corruption. Additionally, those who appeared in the government with Pashinyan mostly came from Armenia’s civil society, which meant they had only limited policy development experience.

The year 2020 was associated with some tectonic upheavals in Armenia. The human toll and economic troubles from the pandemic coupled with the war with Azerbaijan, questioned Pashinyan’s competence. His position was undermined both at home and abroad. Still, no clear alternative to Pashinyan exists, which makes observers believe that a long-term solution to the country’s woes is not forthcoming.

According to the poll by the International Republican Institute, Pashinyan’s “My Step” faction remains the country’s most popular political party with 33% support. Second is “Prosperous Armenia,” the faction led by former President Kocharian. Both have 3%, while the former ruling Republican Party has only 1%. The figures show Pashinyan is still wanted, but political apathy is also on the surge when nearly 44% of Armenians do not support any party and 45% of the population disagrees with the general direction the country heading into. This suggests that in the longer run there is political vacuum, space for a new political force to emerge.

Elections will be competitive, but Pashinyan is likely to win. After all, despite all of his mistakes, Armenia’s military losses are a result of a slow degradation of Armenia’s military potential before his coming to power and the general change in the balance of power, namely, Azerbaijan’s rapid growth as a military power; the latter’s exponential military ties with Turkey, and Russia’s opportunistic behavior during the 2020 war.

New elections may well ease tensions, but the structural problems facing Armenian politics will remain. Deeper flaws, such as a lack of accountability, a lack of an independent judiciary, and a weak parliament, will negatively affect any new government. Additionally, Armenian politics remains highly polarized and personalized, which limits the room for real political changes in the fabric of the country’s management. Long-standing problems with corruption, unemployment, emigration and an ineffective economy will remain.

The parties participating in the Armenian elections are not debating foreign policy. If since 1991 the country’s foreign policy course was always discussed, these elections mark a break with this tradition. Following the war, without the presence of Russia in the country, Yerevan would be unable to defend itself, which gives the elections an external dimension. 

And here Russia’s position matters as it is in a fortunate position to favor both sides of the aisle. Russia does not need to fully support the overtly pro-Kremlin candidate, because in reality every plausible ruling entity in Armenia will become increasingly dependent on Moscow. Take, for example, “Bright Armenia” headed by Edmond Marukyan. The party is known for its moderately pro-European attitude. However, after the 44-day war – Marukyan called for the creation of a second Russian military base in the country. 

Thus, Russia is in a perfect position. With one masterful blow in November 2020, Moscow physically placed itself in the only territorial conflict in the South Caucasus, where it previously had no direct influence. With its peacekeepers in Karabakh, and Armenian army and the general public demoralized and confused after the 2020 fiasco, Russia is Armenia’s only hope. As argued above, this becomes increasingly clear for the entire political spectrum of Armenia’s political elite. 

Thus, the election results will not entail major changes in foreign policy. Nevertheless, the results will be of great importance for the Armenian-Russian relations and Armenia’s geopolitical maneuvering. The political parties are now itching in favor of closer ties with Russia, which could change the very fabric of bilateral relations. Russia can insist on deeper integration of Armenia into its favorite economic organization – Eurasian Economic Union (EEU). Better trading conditions for Russian companies could be sought and more modern Russian weapons could be supplied in return.

The plausible deeper amalgamation could set a scene for a new integration pattern between Russia and the neighbors in the former Soviet space. Deeper ties with Armenia would also mean that Russia could be able to play Armenia and Azerbaijan against each other. This Russian approach is not new, but this time its intensity will be much greater. In four years, Russia will have to officially extend its peacekeeping mission in Azerbaijan. However, the Russian military presence worries the political minds of Baku. The desire to annul the Russian peacekeeping agreement will grow, and the Kremlin will have to play a smart game. 

Some concessions from Baku may be effective, but other political and military messages may work. At times, Russia will indicate to Baku that in case of its peacekeepers’ withdrawal, a much better trained and equipped Armenian army, bristling with high-tech Russian weapons, would prepare for a military campaign. Other ways to persuade Azerbaijan to a prolonged Russian presence might not work. 

Regardless of who wins the upcoming election, the structural troubles besetting Armenia will remain in place. A weak judiciary, military and the parliament will hinder the prospects for a quick solution to the traumas the country has been through since early 2020. The political landscape will remain viciously personalized, which would preclude potential cooperation between the parties to limit internal political pressure. Though Armenians nowadays think little about the country’s foreign policy, critical changes will take place – dependence on Russia will only grow because of the lack of options. Multi-vector policy attempts will cease to be made or will not bring any practical results.

This article was published by Caucasus Watch

Emil Avdaliani has worked for various international consulting companies and currently publishes articles focused on military and political developments across the former Soviet sphere.

 

Israel Faces Pressure to Follow U.S. Armenian Genocide Move Despite Turkey Ties

Newsweek
April 30 2021

BY TOM O'CONNOR ON 4/30/21 AT 1:46 PM EDT

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing mounting pressure to ignore protests by Turkey and follow U.S. President Joe Biden in declaring the mass killings of Armenians and other minority groups a century ago a genocide.

Biden's historic genocide recognition made the United States the 30th country in the world to classify as such the ethnic cleansing that experts estimate killed a million Armenians and hundreds of thousands of other minorities, including Assyrians and Greeks, at the hands of the Ottoman Empire during World War I.

The decision immediately put the U.S. at odds with NATO ally Turkey, the modern successor to the Ottoman Empire. Ankara acknowledges that there were widespread killings amid clashes at the time, but denies that it was part of a systematic campaign that qualifies as genocide.

The move also put the spotlight on another U.S. ally in the Middle East, Israel. Despite the country's intrinsic ties to the systematic massacre of more than six million Jews and other minorities in the Holocaust during World War II, Israel has not recognized an Armenian Genocide.

Today, it still stops short of doing so.

"The State of Israel recognizes the tragedy and terrible suffering of the Armenian people," the Israeli Foreign Ministry said in a statement sent to Newsweek. "At this time in particular, it is our responsibility, and that of other countries in the world, to ensure that such events are not repeated."

While Israel has extended its sympathy to those killed and displaced during the event, Netanyahu's reluctance to take the next step has spurred calls for a new approach that more closely resembled that of the U.S., even from some of Israel's most ardent supporters.

"While some U.S. leaders, most notably Barack Obama, talked about using the 'g word'— genocide—in referring to the Armenian tragedy, in the end they all blinked when faced with Turkey's intense pushback," American Jewish Committee CEO David Harris said in a statement sent to Newsweek. "That's what makes President Joe Biden's decision, which the American Jewish Committee warmly welcomed, all the more significant. He didn't compromise on truth for the sake of political expediency."

AJC, an influential Jewish advocacy organization that predates even the mass killings and displacements in question, "has also encouraged Israel to consider the American step," he said.

Harris said it should be done, even if it came at the cost of fueling further tensions with a powerful regional player.

"It's not been an easy call for Jerusalem, since Ankara plays hardball, and has made it crystal clear that any such move could trigger a costly reaction affecting core Israeli interests," he said. That's far from easy to dismiss or sideline."

"Nonetheless, as a country where the genocide against the Jews is seared into the national consciousness, can Israel afford to avoid recognizing the same Armenian reality?" Harris asked. "When values and interests collide for any country, the latter usually win out."

"On this issue, in Israel's case," he added, "perhaps it will eventually produce a different result."

Armenians carry national flags during a march to commemorate the anniversary of the 1915 massacre of Armenians by the Ottoman Empire during World War I, in Jerusalem, on April 23, ahead of President Joe Biden's announcement. Israel has acknowledged atrocities committed against Armenians and other minorities at the time but has not declared it a "genocide" even as the United States now has.EMMANUEL DUNAND/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Relations between Israel and Turkey today are already severely strained. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has often railed against Netanyahu, and has voiced consistent support for the right of return for Palestinians who themselves were forcefully displaced from lands also claimed by Israel during the country's 1948 establishment.

But relations between the two countries haven't always been hostile. Just a year after Israel came into existence, Turkey was the first majority-Muslim nation to recognize it. Ties between the two countries fluctuated with the tumultuous tides of Middle East politics throughout the following decades, but saw a marked improvement through the turn of the 21st century, with Turkey emerging as Israel's closet regional partner.

But the relationship became strained as tensions in the Palestinian-controlled Gaza Strip erupted into a series of wars. Turkey condemned Israeli operations across the tiny coastal enclave. In one 2010 incident, 10 Turkish citizens—one of them a dual U.S.-Turkish citizen—were killed when Israeli troops raided a flotilla of civilian ships seeking to break the Israel-imposed blockade on Gaza.

Over the past decade, the situation has only worsened. In spite of sporadic attempts at reconciliation, the two powers find themselves on opposite ends of two camps locked in an emerging geopolitical contest in the Mediterranean region. Israel has recently shored up ties with Turkey's historic rival Greece and more closely aligned itself with Egypt, France and the United Arab Emirates, while Turkey has sought to expand its footprint across lucrative maritime gas fields off the coast of Libya.

And while Israel has managed to make inroads across the Arab World over the past year with a set of deals that normalized ties with the UAE, Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco, the country remains deeply unpopular in the region. A study published last year by Qatar's Doha Institute showed a mere 6% average of support for establishing diplomatic relations with Israel among 13 Arab populations polled.

Erdogan, on the other hand, has emerged as an important leader. He ranked ahead of Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in five countries surveyed by the polling project Arab Barometer: Algeria, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco and Tunisia.

In Libya, where Turkey has backed an internationally recognized government against an influential military leader supported by the Egypt-France-UAE bloc, Erdogan was seen as second to the Saudi royal in a tight race among the three leaders listed in the survey.

Only two Arab countries, Lebanon and Syria, have fully recognized an Armenian Genocide.

Turkey, meanwhile, continues to actively campaign against the use of the term, and has similarly beckoned Israel not to shift its stance.

"If there is one country in the whole world which understands the absolute need to refrain from politicizing the use of the term 'genocide,' it is probably Israel," the Turkish embassy in Washington said in a statement sent to Newsweek. "Having suffered the horrors of Holocaust, Israel and Jews all around the world know too well that passing political judgments as such on historical events does neither serve the commemoration of the sufferings of the past nor help prevent the repeat of these crimes."

"On the contrary," the embassy added, "it undermines the weight and importance of the term "genocide" in disrespect of those who actually suffered from this appalling crime."

Ankara argues the debate over what really happened remains ongoing.

"We cannot speak of the motives of the Israeli government, but it is only natural to think that they do not take it lightly the use of the term 'genocide,'" the Turkish embassy said. "This should be particularly so given that none of the conditions required for the use of this term for the events of 1915 are met, including the lack of a decision by a competent international court."

The embassy highlighted decisions adopted by the French Constitutional Council in 2012 and 2017 and by the European Court of Human Rights in 2015 and 2017, that "clearly established that events of 1915 constitute an issue of legitimate historical debate."

The embassy also pointed out Turkey's involvement in promoting Holocaust awareness, including by co-sponsoring the 2005 U.N. General Assembly resolution that established January 27 as International Holocaust Remembrance Day.

"As to Holocaust, on the other hand, safeguarding the memory of this horrific crime and protecting it from the shameful attacks of denialism and distortion is of utmost importance for us," the embassy said.

The embassy also reiterated Turkey's criticism of Biden's decision last week, which it claimed did more harm than good.

"We hope that the entire international community continues to remember this dreadful chapter of the history of mankind with due respect and refrains from exploiting the term "genocide" for narrow political considerations, as President Biden did on April 24 this year," the embassy said, "which only weakens the importance of this term and disrespects the memory of the millions of people who lost their lives as a result of the genocides perpetrated in Nazi Germany, Rwanda or Srebrenica."

For Israel, there's also the additional question of its growing ties with Azerbaijan, a close Turkish partner that fought against Armenia over contested territory last year in an explosive conflict that saw Baku employ Israeli drones that devastated Armenian forces, a campaign that Yerevan likened to a continuation of an Armenian Genocide. Azerbaijan, which neighbors both Turkey and top Israeli foe Iran, has proven a key partner for Israel in defense and energy.

Armenia rejects the position taken by Turkey and Azerbaijan, and argues that countries acknowledging the weight of past human rights abuses was key to preventing new violations on such a scale.

"Armenia condemns the denialistic policy which aims at justifying the Armenian Genocide and preparing grounds for new crimes against humanity," the Armenian Foreign Ministry said in a statement sent to Newsweek. "The strong position of the international community on condemnation of genocides is an important prerequisite for truth and historical justice, as well as prevention of massive human rights violation."

Andranik Israelyan, a Turkologist who formerly served in Armenia's Foreign Affairs and Defense Ministries, provided insight into the Armenian perspective on Israeli hesitance.

"From the Armenian point of view it is very strange to see such a policy," Israelyan told Newsweek. "An average Armenian is always perplexed why people who are victims of a genocide find it hard to acknowledge others' tragedy."

But he saw potential change on the horizon in Israel.

"My opinion is that Israeli recognition is an upcoming development, but will depend on its relationship with Turkey and Azerbaijan," he said.

And major factors have come into play at home as well. As Netanyahu faces a new chorus of critics, Israelyan said there had been a "significant change in Israeli attitude to the issue." He argued that "Israeli society is nowadays more inclined towards recognizing the Armenian genocide."

To demonstrate this, Israelyan took note of the Israeli Knesset Committee on Education Culture and Sports decision in 2016 to recognize an Armenian Genocide. A number of nations have seen their legislatures take action on the issue and in some cases, like that of the U.S. Congress' 2019 vote, it preceded eventual movement on the executive level.

Israeli President Reuven Rivlin was among the nation's leading proponents for the move during his tenure as speaker of parliament, but he has avoided using the term "Armenian Genocide" since taking office in Netanyahu's government in 2014.

Still, Netanyahu's political opponents have continued to call for a new policy regarding Armenian Genocide recognition at a time of political deadlock in Israel.

One of Netanyahu's top rivals, center-right Yesh Atid leader Yair Lepid, called Biden's announcement "an important moral statement," vowing to "continue to fight for Israeli recognition of the Armenian Genocide; it is our moral responsibility as the Jewish state."

Left-wing Meretz Knesset member Tamar Zandberg said "the time has come for Israel to also clean itself of political interests and act for the most basic justice and recognize the Armenian genocide" and that "the Jewish state cannot lend a hand to attempts to erase history."

Another leading opponent, center right-wing to right-wing New Hope head Gideon Sa'ar, has also expressed support for recognizing an Armenian Genocide in the past.

In Washington, the head of one leading institution raising awareness on systematic atrocities joined others in drawing parallels between the experiences of the Jewish and the Armenian peoples. U.S. National Holocaust Memorial Director Sara J. Bloomfield welcomed Biden's move and emphasized the need for global recognition.
"Holocaust history teaches that an honest reckoning with the past is a prerequisite to understanding the present and building a better future," Museum said in a statement sent to Newsweek.

The U.S. National Holocaust Memorial has also classified as genocides the mass killings against Tutsis in Rwanda in 1994, against Muslims in Bosnia and Herzegovina's Srebrenica in 1995, against non-Arab minorities in Sudan's Darfur in the early 2000s, against Yezidis in Islamic State militant group (ISIS)-controlled Iraq in 2014 and against the Muslim Rohingyas in Myanmar in 2017.

The museum pointed out that the Armenian experience is central to our current understanding of what defines genocide.

In the midst of the Holocaust in 1944, Polish-Jewish lawyer Raphael Lemkin drew upon the events that befell the Armenians and other communities in the Ottoman Empire when he coined the term "genocide." The crime was first recognized as such under international law by the United Nations General Assembly in 1946.

As the international community continues to grapple with conflicting narratives 75 years later, Bloomfield urged countries across the world to come to terms with the past.

"Recognizing the full magnitude of the crimes committed against the Armenian people, even a century following the events, is important not only for the victims and their descendants," she said. "We know from watching Europe deal with the Holocaust and its legacy since 1945, just how important it is for all societies to openly acknowledge difficult national history."