Pashinyan can’t be interim PM, eight parties claim

Panorama, Armenia

Eight Armenian political parties released a statement stating that Nikol Pashinyan cannot serve as caretaker prime minister. The full text of the statement is provided below.

"On April 25, Nikol Pashinyan resigned, but the claims in the resignation, in violation of all legal and political grounds, were an ultimatum for political forces and citizens of Armenia since he stated that he will continue to serve as interim prime minister of Armenia and only in this case will he agree to hold snap parliamentary elections.

We declare and warn:

A. Nikol Pashinyan must leave PM's office so that he doesn’t have any opportunity to make the state and administrative forces and institutions serve for his regeneration, otherwise, his actions will be considered seizure of power.

B ․ Pashinyan's further tenure as acting prime minister will pose a direct threat to the law and order during the upcoming elections, as a result of which we will have a weak and puppet parliament and government with low legitimacy.

C. The formation of a parliament with low legitimacy will directly lead to internal political and civil clashes and disintegration of the Republic of Armenia.

The signatories are:

PARUYR HAYRIKYAN (Union for National Self-Determination)
ARTUR BALOYAN (Justice Party)
NARINE DILBARYAN (Heritage Party)
PETROS MAKEYAN (Democratic Homeland Party)
ANDRIAS GHUKASYAN (Armenian Constructive Party)
GARNIK MARGARYAN (Homeland and Honor Party)
ARTYOM KHACHIKYAN (Hayk (Haykazunner) Party)
MIKAYEL HAYRAPETYAN (Conservative Party)”

Baroness Caroline Cox “ashamed” UK hasn’t recognized Armenian Genocide to date

Save

Share

 19:20,

YEREVAN, APRIL 23, ARMENPRESS. Member of the British House of Lords, Baroness Caroline Cox calls on the United Kingdom to recognize the Armenian Genocide.

She addressed three messages during a video statement for ARMENPRESS on the occasion of the 106th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide.

“The first is a message of gratitude to the Armenian people who held the frontline of faith and freedom for the rest of the world”, Caroline Cox. She noted that despite the sacrifice and enormous sufferings and also living with neighbors who do not have a respect to human rights and democracy, the Armenian people remained committed to the preservation of universal values. “You are a beacon of light in a very dark part of the world”, she said.

Her second message was about anger. “The international community has allowed Turkey and Azerbaijan impunity for the violation of human rights and to perpetrate atrocities”, Caroline Cox said.

She talked about three genocides, stating that the first one took place in 1915 by the Ottoman Empire, and the next two ones, according to her, are the wars by Azerbaijan against Artsakh in 1990-1994 and 2020. “The last war was full of war crimes. The Genocide Watch independent organization has defined the recent war as genocide. So, as we are commemorating the Genocide, but still continuing genocide against people. I challenge Her Majesty’s government to recognize the Genocide again and again. I am ashamed they don’t”, she said.

Caroline Cox expressed happiness over the fact that Wales within the UK has already recognized the Armenian Genocide, and added that there is a even an Armenian Genocide memorial in Cardiff, the capital of Wales.

“My third message is one of love and affection. I had a privilege of visiting your nation 85 times, and many were during the previous war in Artsakh. And I also came with my colleague David Thomas during the last war. And we always return humbled and inspired by your people, your courage, your hospitality, culture and your commitment to democracy. It’s hard to think of any nation in the world of a comparable size that has contributed so much to human civilization in art, culture, education and many other areas. I promise you that we will stand with you in love, affection and gratitude. And all we can is to try to help you to achieve the justice you deserve”, Baroness Caroline Cox said.

[see video]

Putin highlights Russia’s key role in stopping recent NK war

Save

Share

 16:43,

YEREVAN, APRIL 21, ARMENPRESS. While delivering his State of the Nation Address to the Federal Assembly today, Russian President Vladimir Putin has also touched upon Russia’s role in stopping the recent war in Nagorno Karabakh.

“Russia is always open for broad international cooperation. We consistently support preserving and strengthening the UN’s key role in international matters, seek to assist solving the regional conflicts and have already done a lot for the stabilization of the situation in Syria and the establishment of political dialogue in Libya. As you know, Russia played a major role in stopping the armed conflict in Nagorno Karabakh”, the Russian President said.  

 

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Androulakis: Azerbaijani President Insults The Memory Of Dead Armenian Soldiers

Greek City Times
April 13 2021

<img height="1" width="1" st1yle="display:none" alt="fbpx" src=”"https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=757612155098568&ev=PageView&noscript=1" />

<style> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style>

by Paul Antonopoulos

A “park” which display “trophy” helmets and dummies of Armenian soldiers who were martyred in last years war in Nagorno-Karabakh, was inaugurated on Monday by Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and condemned by MEP Nikos Androulakis.

In a post on social media, Member of the European Parliament for the Movement for Change, Nikos Androulakis, denounced the country’s president and stressed that he “insults the memory of the Armenian soldiers” by establishing a park of “barbarism.”

“International organisations cannot remain silent to these medieval practices that shame humanity,” he said.

According to local media, the “park” in the Azerbaijani capital of Baku will receive its first visitors on April 14.

Armenian Historians’ Open Letter to US President to Recognize the Armenian Genocide

April 14 2021

04/14/2021 Armenia (International Christian Concern) – Armenian historians have submitted a request for the United States’ recognition of the Armenian Genocide via an open letter to President Biden. Few countries officially recognize the 1915 Armenian Genocide, the United States included, due to attempts to preserve good relations with Turkey. In December 2019, the United States Congress passed resolutions to recognize the genocide, though at the international level does little in condemning Turkey’s role.

Turkey long denies that the 1915 events were genocide, despite the systematic ethnic cleansing of around 1 million Armenians by the Ottoman Empire.  The genocide and its expulsion of Armenian Christians and their identities began what is the ongoing pan-Turkism rhetoric. By officially recognizing the 1915 Armenian Genocide, the United States and other countries can take stronger action against Turkey and Azerbaijan for the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh War and further attempts to cleanse the region of ethnic Armenians. For more background on the Nagorno-Karabakh War, read ICC’s report here.

The open letter to President Biden by Armenian historians is as follows:

 

April 14, 2021

 

TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN

 

Dear Mr. President,

This appeal from historians of Armenia does not intend to prove the obvious facts of the Armenian Genocide. These incontrovertible facts have long been known to the civilized world, including the American scientific community. Our sole concern today on the eve of April 24 is the persistent and baseless denials by the Turkish Government that provides a carte blanche for perpetrating new genocidal actions. The most recent such episode was committed with the extensive participation of international terrorist groups against the peaceful Armenian population of Nagorno-Karabakh.

Turkey, a NATO member state with advanced powerful weapons and terrorism links, behaves as a serial killer in Nagorno-Karabakh since it has not been held accountable for its previous crimes against humanity and civilization. Turkey’s sinister actions, combining western technology with medieval manslaughter methodology used by terrorists, remind us that the accusations brought by the three Entente Powers — Great Britain, France and Russia — in their statement of May 24, 1915 condemning the Turkish State for its crimes against humanity and civilization, are still relevant to our days. Therefore, the serious accusations against Turkey by the Entente Powers, later joined by the United States during WWI led by Pres. Woodrow Wilson of blessed memory, remains unclear and unimplemented from a legal point of view thus serving grounds for new atrocities.

Turkey, the perpetrator of the still unpunished mass crime of the Armenian Genocide, the first genocide of the 20th century, deceitfully maneuvers among the world powers for one hundred years to avoid responsibility for genocidal acts committed not only against Armenians, but also targeting Greeks and Assyrians. Moreover, the Turkish leaders, outside of the international community’s control and suffering from arrogance, just like leaders of Nazi Germany, constitute a threat not only for Armenia, but also its neighbors and the entire civilized world.

The Turkish phenomenon of an unpunished criminal currently is being manifested also through the annihilation of cultural and religious centers of its victims and systematic substitution of historical memory of the region’s nations by exploiting its gigantic propagandistic state machine, spreading falsehoods in a massive scale reminiscent of Goebbels’s propaganda.

In recent years, we as historians of Armenia have written many books describing the Machiavellian schemes of Turkey attempting through all means to mislead the international community and prevent using the term “Genocide” in your forthcoming annual proclamation on the occasion of April 24. The latest example of such falsehoods concerns the groundless statement that no judicial rulings recognizing the Armenian Genocide exist and distorted interpretations of the Genocide Convention adopted in 1948. The truth is that the Armenian Genocide was first recognized by the Ottoman courts in their rulings during 1919-1920. Moreover, the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide although adopted in 1948, a few years after the Holocaust, nevertheless Raphael Lemkin included in the definition of the genocidal acts not only the crimes committed during the Holocaust, but also the crimes fixed in item ‘e’ of Article 2 of the Convention, i.e. forcibly transferring children of the group to another group, which did not take place during the Jewish Holocaust. This is a criminal act unique to the Armenian Genocide, i.e., the definition of the Convention of December 9, 1948 includes a crime element committed solely during the Armenian Genocide, therefore it cannot omit this historical fact that it served as a foundation just like it cannot omit the Holocaust just because it was committed before 1948.

The two biggest crimes perpetrated against humanity and civilization during WWI and WWII — the Armenian Genocide and the Holocaust — have set up clear red lines for peaceful co-existence on the planet in the 20th century constituting an inseparable part of mankind’s legal conscience. Their protection and prevention of new genocides first of all depends on the guarantor of freedom and human rights across the world — the will and determination of the United States of America.

The decisive condition for preventing new genocidal aspirations by Turkey, a state that committed bloody crimes against its neighbors in the vast region stretching from the Balkans to the Armenian Highlands, and enforcing the honoring of its international obligations lie in overcoming the Turkish phenomenon of impunity for the Armenian atrocities based on Hitler’s cynical words: “Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?” and recognition of the Armenian Genocide in an unrestricted and definitive manner. Only through calling that crime by its clear legal term — genocide — it will be possible to stop ignoring Erdogan’s genocidal aspirations by other irresponsible representatives of the international community and even encouraging a Munich Agreement style politics. All approaches other than the facing off of the criminal with his victims as well as a real reconciliation will contribute to further encouraging and expanding the dangerous ambitions of Erdogan who has become the Middle East’s new Hitler through systematic concealing of truth and justice.

In this historical moment, the souls of innocent victims of the Armenian Genocide as well as other millions who experienced a similar pattern of violence and sufferings are praying to hear from you the term GENOCIDE in your annual proclamation on the occasion of April 24.

 

Most respectfully,

 

The Historians Association of Armenia

Institute of History, National Academy of Sciences

The Department of History, Yerevan State University

Institute of Armenian Studies, Yerevan State University

The Department of History, Armenian State Pedagogical University

Food: This 1990s Cooking Bible is as Relevant as Ever

Saveur
April 13 2021

Three decades before khachapuri was cool, Anya von Bremzen was extolling its virtues in "Please to the Table."

Open Please to the Table to a random page, and you might land on a recipe for chicken Kiev, Armenian lamb dumplings, Uzbek cilantro buns, or Latvian cornmeal mush. Such dishes may appear to have nothing in common, but as this seminal cookbook on the cuisines of the Soviet Union reminds us, they once belonged to a rich culinary patchwork quilt that stretched 8.6 million square miles, from the Baltic Sea to Central Asia. 

That quilt came unstitched three decades ago with the collapse of the USSR, but the 400-some recipes in Please to the Table—the SAVEUR Cookbook Club pick for April and May—read as current as ever with dishes like rye cookies, tahdig, Georgian khachapuri, and foraged bitter-green salads in the mix. 

Shepherding us through the complex, variegated territories of the former Soviet Union is Anya von Bremzen, who was born in Moscow in 1963, and John Welchman, her coauthor. If von Bremzen’s name rings a bell, that’s because her byline has appeared in all the major food and travel magazines, as well as on award-winning books including The New Spanish Table and Mastering the Art of Soviet Cooking, her memoir. 

Almost as enticing as the recipes in Please to the Table are the essays and anecdotes peppered throughout, which offer colorful glimpses into topics ranging from geography and religion to the etymology of kasha (it originally meant “feast”) and the proper way to serve Uzbek pilaf (rice buried under the meat in serving bowls; tea and pickles on the side). Literature buffs will be pleased to find a bevy of food-related excerpts from greats like Pushkin, Dumas, and Chekhov interspersed among the recipes.  

Von Bremzen is a cookbook writer with an emphasis on the writer. Her prose is snappy and evocative, especially when she’s on a jag about gastro-cultural curiosities. In the chapter on Russian cuisine, for instance, she recounts the cross-cultural horror story of a Russian friend who was invited to an American’s apartment, only to be offered a bowl of ice cream. “It sometimes takes years for Soviet emigrés in the United States to understand that a casual invitation to someone’s home doesn’t necessarily mean a full-scale meal,” she writes. Later, in an explainer on Armenian cuisine (the book is organized by main ingredient with explainers interspersed throughout), she paints such a vivid picture of her first breakfast in Yerevan that you can almost smell it through the page: “We were greeted with eggs scrambled with ripe tomatoes and green peppers, local sheep’s cheese (chanakh), a delicious spicy sausage called sudjuk, and generous cupfuls of strong black coffee. And there were freshly prepared stuffed vegetables (dolma) awaiting us for later.” 

Even the sample menus in the margins manage to be transportive. You can keep your Pinterest moodboards and Instagram recipe reels—I’ll be getting my cooking inspo on page 452 with “A Rustic Luncheon for Eight,” which reads: “herring in sour cream sauce, my mother’s marinated mushrooms, beet caviar with walnuts and prunes, pumpernickel bread, vodka, schi, meat-filled pirog, Russian cranberry mousse.” 

Last week I had the privilege of chatting with von Bremzen about what it took to produce this 659-page behemoth and how the cuisines explored in the book have changed since its first print run.  

BK: You’ve lived a fascinating and rather peripatetic life. Tell me about it. 

AvB: I was born in Moscow in 1963 during the Brezhnev years. It was a time of Iron Curtain stagnation. Like every Soviet kid, I wanted jeans and foreign commodities and was obsessed with the idea of being abroad, being a foreigner. My mom and I immigrated to the U.S. in 1974 because she hated the regime and was Jewish. She felt trapped. Being Jewish in the USSR then, you weren’t persecuted but you were discriminated against.

We wound up in Philadelphia, but weirdly I wanted to be perceived as a foreigner still. This early fantasy of not belonging was very powerful to me, and immigration was hard. I felt homesick because our past was so complicated. We were cooped up in the Soviet Union under a terrible, repressive regime, and when we emigrated, it was without the right to return. We were traitors of the homeland. To our friends and family, it was like dying with a right to correspondence. 

BK: In Please to the Table, there are recipes for a staggering variety of dishes from across the former Soviet Union. Give me the lay of the land. 

AvB: When I was growing up, the mindset was, you can’t see Paris or Rome, so why don’t you have a holiday in Odessa or Uzbekistan or Georgia? For us, these were exotic destinations. As a child, you could call me a propagandist because I was obsessed with this idea of the Soviet Union and fascinated by its diversity. At the market in Moscow, you’d see Georgians with mustaches in hats and Uzbek ladies in braids that sold very expensive produce that could cost a month’s salary. 

I was obsessed with this idea of the Soviet Union and fascinated by its diversity. At the market in Moscow, you’d see Georgians with mustaches in hats and Uzbek ladies in braids that sold very expensive produce that could cost a month’s salary. 

Anya Von Bremzen

BK: Were you always a cook? 

AvB: God, no! I trained to be a concert pianist and went to Juliard. It was rigorous. But I got a hand injury in my 20s that forced me to look for another career. I spoke Italian from spending some time in Italy, and I wound up translating a cookbook from Italian to English. It made me think—shit, maybe I should write my own cookbook. My boyfriend was a British travel writer and a sort of academic type, and he and I wrote the proposal together in 1988. It got a James Beard Award the year they had started giving them, and the book [was] one of Amazon’s top 100 cookbooks. 

BK: 1988 was right when the Soviet Union started to disintegrate. 

AvB: Yes, and everyone was saying, right, a book about bread lines and shortages and herring? But I wanted to explore the whole diversity of Soviet cuisine. There were these Cold War stereotypes of gray clothing and people starving. Many Americans imagined the whole Soviet Union as a gulag, but the truth was, some of the food there was actually amazing. I think I was one of the first people to write about Georgian or Uzbek cuisine in such detail. In the end, Workman Publishing, which had just come out with The Silver Palate, bought the proposal. 

BK: What surprised you most in researching the book? 

AvB: Driving through Ukraine on Christmas, our car broke down. We wound up sleeping in a kind stranger’s hut, and there was this amazing salad of white beets, cracklings, and wild mushrooms. 

It was a long time ago now, but I remember other little things as well, like how in Uzbekistan they made pilaf with yellow carrots and quince and steamed cilantro buns that tasted almost Chinese. Other discoveries were Tatar wedding pie and an Azerbaijani pilaf with a chestnut and pumpkin crust. 

An array of Azeri sweets, including a starburst of almond-cardamom.

BK: A little birdie told me you’re working on a book about food and national identity.  

AvB: Yes, but I don’t have a name for it yet. It will look at how national identity is a social construct. We assume cuisines are primordial like languages, but we forget that nation states basically didn’t exist before the 19th century. The idea of cultural appropriation in food assumes an essentialist vision of a national cuisine, which is in fact a hybrid construction that is fluid. Take the current gastro-nationalist fight about borscht, for example, between Russia and Ukraine—it says a lot more about the state of geopolitics than the provenance of a dish that has been eaten in a wide geographical region. Dishes often existed long before current national borders did. So arguments about “whose hummus” or “whose baklava” are really about other issues. 

BK: So, food played—and continues to play—a role in post-Soviet nation-building?

AvB: Yes, but even today, there’s a pan-Soviet cuisine enjoyed across the region: Everyone makes salade olivier and vinegret [pickled vegetable salad] and kotlety [beef and buckwheat patties]. In Uzbekistan, the old Soviet dishes—herring, etc.—are still prestigious.  

BK: How has the way people eat in the region changed since you wrote the book? 

AvB: There are more ingredients available now. Some old breeds of goats and cows and vegetables are being revived. That’s different from the Soviet way, which favored monoculture—Uzbekistan made cotton, Moldova made wine. It’s a long conversation. 

And there is a new national consciousness around food that is not dictated by Moscow. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, food became more proprietary and gastro-nationalistic. Suddenly there were arguments in Samarkand over whose pilaf was better—the Uzbeks’ or the Tajiks’. Georgians were going on about Abkhazians having no cuisine and no culture. In Armenia, there’s an NGO that goes into the mountains to find 19th-century recipes; ditto for Azerbaijan, where they’re writing books about how Armenians plagiarized their cuisine. The thing is, cuisines don’t stand still—well, maybe except for in Brighton Beach in Brooklyn, where the food is still very 70s.   

BK: What Please to the Table recipes do you keep coming back to?

AvB: My mom’s borscht, of course, which is super quick and delicious. It’s the version she is teaching people to make in her new League of Kitchens online class. I also love the rice pilaf with almonds and orange zest—it’s my go-to side dish for everything. I make the Uzbek lamb and rice plov often. It’s a classic. Then there’s the beef stroganoff recipe, which is so good because it calls for filet mignon. 

BK: What are some popular springtime dishes or traditions? 

AvB: Winter was always so long, and the taste of the first dill or cucumber was always so special. People make cold borscht and soups this time of year. Maslenitsa, the blini and butter festival, just passed. There’s a whole section on Easter cooking in the book—we do a cheese mold that’s eaten with kulich coffee cake, but you can sub panettone. People love it. 

BK: For American food lovers planning post-pandemic travel, what country in the region should be at the top of the list? 

AvB: I was in Azerbaijan four years ago, and it has mind-boggling food. It’s sort of Persian with some Soviet influences. They have a million types of pilaf, some with tahdig. Many dishes are bright green with herbs—green stews and green meatballs and green omelets with green sauces. It all tastes so fresh. And because Azerbaijan has oil money, there’s a restaurant culture, and you can walk along the Caspian Sea and stop into tea houses where they serve teas with jams made from yellow cherries and figs.  

BK: Can I pick a bone? The title of the book is Please to the Table: The Russian Cookbook. That seems a bit narrow, right? 

AvB: It’s true: The book goes from Lithuania to Central Asia and gives you the full scope of the former empire. When I published it, I thought, I can’t call it a Soviet cookbook, so this was the next-best thing. But then I got angry letters from Ukranians and Armenians. Who knows, maybe you could put “USSR” in a cookbook title now and it would be a retro cool thing. 

Pashinyan: There will be parliamentary elections in Armenia in near future

News.am, Armenia

There will be parliamentary elections in Armenia in the near future, and you can judge, by your vote, whom we [the incumbent authorities] have not judged. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan on Saturday stated this in Rind village of Armenia’s Vayots Dzor Province.

"That is also a trial. On June 20, 2021, each of you can judge whom you think we should have judged and could not judge. You can judge us, too, the others, too, and I am convinced that the Armenian people will judge fairly.

We are going to the [snap] parliamentary elections for two reasons, as the situation has been very difficult since November, they were telling us, 'You are clinging to power.' But we were maintaining the power that belongs to the people, and we have no right to give power to the first one. We are holding snap parliamentary elections fore one purpose: to hand over to you the power [we] received from you. You will decide who you will delegate to that power later," the PM said.

Pashinyan added that he will step down as PM at the end of April, after that the parliament will not elect a premier twice, then the parliament will be considered dissolved, and then snap parliamentary elections will take place.

He stressed that during this period the other political forces will not nominate a PM candidate. "Now there is a lot of talk that they will change the power during that time; they cannot. If such an attempt is made, the parliamentary majority will elect me prime minister, and the topic will be closed," Nikol Pashinyan stressed.

Turkish press: Turkey gives US non-paper on roadmap to proceed on bilateral ties: FM – Turkey News

Ankara has submitted a non-paper to Washington on a road map that outlined Turkey’s proposals to proceed with U.S.-Turkey bilateral ties, Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu said on April 15.

“We talked about S-400s, FETÖ, and the support given by the U.S. to terrorist organizations. We talked about what we think and what we can do about Afghanistan, Syria, and regional issues. We agree that it is necessary to proceed on a road map in all matters. We are also working on this. We even gave a document that we call ‘non-paper’ to the U.S.,” Çavuşoğlu said, referring to his discussions with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

So, we have given the U.S. a document stating the views of Turkey, telling what steps both parties can take,” he told NTV broadcaster.

“The U.S. is working on this document,” the minister stated.

Çavuşoğlu expressed optimism on the plans that the two countries would work together and said the road map aims to achieve progress in the solution of bilateral disagreements. “To solve other problems, we need to negotiate what we can do as a whole on the roadmap and then apply,” he stated.

“If the U.S. continues to support terrorist organizations, our relations will be negatively affected,” Çavuşoğlu also said.

Elaborating on the stance of U.S. President Joe Biden on Armenian allegations over the events of 1915, Çavuşoğlu said, “The U.S. presidents made this claim in the past. A country like the U.S. makes many reminders to other countries. If the U.S. considers international law, it will not make such a decision.”
“We think that the U.S. will not make such a statement on April 24. Let’s say he [Biden] agreed at worst. Such a situation would not be accepted just because a politician said such a thing. The U.N. made its decision openly in 1948,” the minister said.

Turkish delegation to visit Egypt

Turkey will send a delegation led by its deputy foreign minister to Egypt in early May, upon the invitation of Cairo, according to Çavuşoğlu.

He could meet his Egyptian counterpart as well after this visit, the minister also said.

Last month, Turkey said it had resumed diplomatic contacts with Egypt and wanted to further cooperation, eight years after a military coup staged by Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi.

Turkey and Egypt have recently released statements on bilateral ties, suggesting an expected restoration in relations after more than seven years of political estrangement.

Turkey not picking sides in recent Black Sea tension

Turkey is not picking a side in the conflict between Ukraine and Russia, Çavuşoğlu said.

“Of course, we want the Black Sea to be a sea of peace. There is a consensus reached by all riparian countries to come together and determine their maritime jurisdiction. If desired, the Black Sea can be turned into a sea of peace. We defend this. Currently, the Ukraine-Russia tension is preventing this,” he stated.

“Our relations with both Russia and Ukraine are in a good state. We make the same suggestions to both countries to solve their problems peacefully. Turkey’s stance is clear. We are pleased with this calming down,” he said, referring to the U.S. decision to cancel the deployment of two warships to the Black Sea.

Over the weekend, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan called for an end to “worrying” developments in eastern Ukraine’s Donbass region after meeting his Ukrainian counterpart. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov subsequently said Turkey and other nations should not feed “belligerent sentiment” in Ukraine.

Armenian Genocide Survivor Dies Aged 106

Greek City News

<img height="1" width="1" st1yle="display:none" alt="fbpx" src=”"https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=757612155098568&ev=PageView&noscript=1" />

<style> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style>

by Paul Antonopoulos

A survivor of the Armenian Genocide passed away at the age of 106.

Ovsanna Mirkhanyan passed away in Lenughi village of Armenia’s western Armavir province, her son Sargis Mirkhanyan told Armenpress.

“She has undergone a complex surgery,” her son Sargis Mirkhanyan said.

“Besides, she could not get out of bed because she fell in the yard,” he explained.

“We are 5 children. My mother had 2 daughters in Syria, they both died”, Mirkhanyan added.

Ovsanna Mirkhanyan was the last genocide survivor in the Turkish-bordering province.

Turkis press: UN should probe Armenia’s war crimes in Karabakh: Turkish Commission

An Azerbaijani man named Saire Guliyeva stands near the ruins of his dwelling, Ganja, Azerbaijan, Nov. 28, 2020. (AP File Photo)

The United Nations should appoint a special rapporteur to investigate war crimes committed by Armenia in Nagorno-Karabakh, and Armenian officials responsible for the crimes need to be tried by an international court, the Turkish Parliament’s Human Rights Commission said in a report Thursday.

The commission, which visited Nagorno-Karabakh and Azerbaijan to examine the situation on the ground, noted that Armenia had intentionally targeted homes, hospitals, cemeteries schools and business compounds to destroy them. It called on the U.N. to immediately appoint a rapporteur to determine war crimes and other human rights violations during the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

“The Council of the European Union also needs to include this issue on their agenda,” the report said.

The Armenian military also used cluster bombs, which are indiscriminate in nature and leave unexploded bomblets on the ground that can kill and injure civilians even after attacks are halted.

Moreover, the commission found that civilian settlements in the city of Ganja were targeted twice in ballistic missile attacks.

Ganja was one of the most targeted Azerbaijani towns in the most recent conflict. The first Armenian attack on the region took place on Oct. 4, when a missile hit the city and killed one person and injured 30 others. The second attack took place on Oct. 8, during which many residential buildings were damaged, however, no loss of life was incurred. Then, on Oct.10, only a day after Russia brokered a cease-fire between the warring sides, Armenia attacked for the third time. An Armenian Scud missile hit an apartment complex in Ganja, completely destroying it. During this attack, the city’s infrastructure was heavily damaged as well. In the attack, 10 civilians were killed and 40 others were injured, including women and children. A total of 95 buildings were damaged, impacting the lives of approximately 205 people. The fourth and final attack took place on Oct.17. After the firing of the Armenian Scud missiles, three massive explosions rocked the city. These attacks were conducted in densely populated areas.

“As findings on the ground confirm, the civilian and military leaders who pushed Armenia into this war need to be tried by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for war crimes against civilians and their damage needs to be compensated,” the report said.

Turkey’s Ombudsman Institution had previously prepared a similar report on Armenia’s war crimes and human rights violations against Azerbaijan.

Relations between the former Soviet republics of Azerbaijan and Armenia have been tense since 1991 when the Armenian military occupied Nagorno-Karabakh, a territory recognized as part of Azerbaijan, and seven adjacent Azerbaijani regions.

Clashes erupted on Sept. 27 and the Armenian Army continued attacks on civilians and Azerbaijani forces, even violating humanitarian cease-fire agreements for 44 days.

Baku liberated several cities and nearly 300 settlements and villages from the Armenian occupation during this time. On Nov. 10, the two countries signed a Russian-brokered agreement to end fighting and work toward a comprehensive resolution.

The truce is seen as a victory for Azerbaijan and a defeat for Armenia.