All suspected cases of 2019-nCoV test negative in Armenia so far, authorities say

Save

Share

 13:07, 7 February, 2020

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 7, ARMENPRESS. All suspected cases of the novel coronavirus in Armenia have tested negative so far, authorities said.

The Healthcare and Labor Inspection Agency, which is in charge of monitoring all arrivals at the borders, said that anyone arriving from China, or who has traveled to China in the last 14 days, is being quarantined in the event of having fever. The further monitoring after the hospitalization is carried out by the healthcare ministry.

“Fortunately, so far all hospitalized people have tested negative for the disease,” the agency said.

As of February 7, the number of confirmed cases of 2019-nCoV in China has surpassed 31100, 636 have died and 1540 have recovered.

On February 5, the Ministry of Healthcare of Armenia said that since January 27 a total of 859 people have arrived to Armenia from China and all of them are being monitored in accordance to their residence location.

So far, 40 people having symptoms associated with the disease have been hospitalized. 26 of them have been discharged, 14 remain hospitalized. “Everyone is receiving symptomatic treatment, and lab tests are conducted in the event of necessity”, the inspectorate reported.

All suspected cases of the novel coronavirus tested negative so far, authorities said.

Edited and translated by Stepan Kocharyan




Erebuni Plaza gunman refuses to give testimony

Save

Share

 18:14,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 24, ARMENPRESS. The gunman who opened fire at Erebuni Plaza business center on January 23 denies giving testimony, ARMENPRESS reports head of the press service of the Investigative Committee of Armenia Naira Zohrabyan told ARMENPRESS.

“Yesterday he denied giving testimony and requested a lawyer. He said he will talk only in the presence of the lawyer. There are no more details so far”, Harutyunyan said.

At 14:45, January 23, Yerevan police received a shots fired call in the Erebuni Plaza Business Center. No one has been injured. The gunman surrendered to the Police after talks with the acting Police Chief of Armenia Arman Sargsyan.

Edited and translated by Tigran Sirekanyan

Armenian farmers protest new slaughterhouse regulations

OC Media
Jan 22 2020

Этот пост доступен на языках: Русский

Photo: news.am

Livestock farmers and meat vendors have begun protest­ing the enforce­ment of rules oblig­at­ing all meat sellers and livestock producers to slaughter their meat only in approved slaugh­ter­hous­es.

Protests in the capital Yerevan cul­mi­nat­ed on 20 January when a large group of pro­test­ers picketing in front of the Gov­ern­ment building during a scheduled session of Gov­ern­ment blocked off one of the streets leading to the city’s central Republic Square.

The protests came after on 15 January, the Government’s Food Safety Inspec­torate (FSI) launched inspec­tions of all meat selling stores and super­mar­kets across Yerevan. The rules around slaugh­ter­ing animals were intro­duced by the gov­ern­ment in July 2018 but were not imme­di­ate­ly enforced.

Speaking to 1TV in a live video from one of the inspec­tions, Artur Shatvoryan, advisor to the head of the FSI, explained that the decision was never properly imple­ment­ed due to a lack of des­ig­nat­ed slaugh­ter­hous­es. 

‘Six months ago, our agency made it clear that starting from January 2020, inspec­tions would take place and the decision would come into full force.’ 

‘Special working groups have been created to help establish more slaugh­ter­hous­es, train personnel, etc.’, he added.

The rules mean that all meat vendors and super­mar­kets must purchase meat with an accom­pa­ny­ing document asserting that the meat was butchered in a licensed slaugh­ter­house. 

The document includes a barcode with infor­ma­tion including the owner of the animal, where the meat came from, which slaugh­ter­house it was slaugh­tered in, the day it was slaugh­tered, and expi­ra­tion dates. Consumers can scan the barcode before pur­chas­ing to see where the meat comes from. 

Shatvoryan said that his agency had conducted meetings with provin­cial governors and community leaders in order for them to com­mu­ni­cate the process to farmers and butchers in their com­mu­ni­ties. 

On 16 January, the FSI signed contracts with almost 30 slaugh­ter­hous­es estab­lish­ing the maximum price for the slaughter of animals. The maximum price for the slaughter of large animals was set at ֏10,000 ($21), small cows at ֏ 3,500 ($7.30) and pigs at ֏ 5,000 ($10).

The contracts also state that trans­porta­tion for livestock to slaugh­ter­hous­es will be free for farmers if they are no further than 30 kilo­me­tres from the slaugh­ter­house and are trans­port­ing more than three animals. If not, they will be charged ֏3,000 ($6.30) per animal. 

Many livestock farmers and butchers have remained unhappy with the decision. During the protest on 20 January, pro­test­ers told reporters that trans­port­ing animals was a difficult task. 

‘I can barely take my cow out to slaughter in my own yard, how am I supposed to get them on a vehicle and move them?’ one asked. 

Others said they were not against trans­port­ing their livestock but that there were currently not enough slaugh­ter­hous­es. 

‘How is a poor villager supposed to drive 90 kilo­me­tres with two pigs to reach [the nearest] slaugh­ter­house?’ one asked. ‘Where’s your con­science?’

In an interview with Azatutyun on 18 January, Shatvoryan said that the majority of the pro­tes­tors weren’t actually farmers but meat suppliers, who slaugh­tered animals to sell the meat to vendors and butchers.

‘Our inspec­tors know these middlemen’, said Shatvoryan. ‘They are working for meat vendors who with the [new documents] won’t be able to sell meat from sick or dead livestock. They will also be forced to pay taxes, thus, losing their former profit.’

In an interview with state-run news agency  Armen­press, Anush Haru­tyun­yan, head of the Infor­ma­tion and Public Relations Depart­ment at the FSI, said that strict inspec­tions were already taking place and many large super­mar­kets and restau­rants had already switched to using meat from the official slaugh­ter­hous­es.

Following the 2o January protest in Yerevan, a number of demon­stra­tors continued their protests the following day in their hometowns, closing major streets.

Several small protests were held on 21 January in Tavush, Armavir, and Ararat provinces. During a protest near the village of Mkhchyan, the Governor of Ararat, Garik Sargsyan, met with protest leaders. 

In a post on Facebook, Sargsyan said that the gov­ern­ment was prepared to listen to its citizens but insisted that ‘closing streets is not a rea­son­able way to solve issues’.  

During the meeting, Sargsyan told pro­tes­tors that there would be com­pro­mis­es and that par­lia­ment had assured him that there will be mean­ing­ful solutions to this issue. 

On 20 January, the Office of the Human Rights Defender announced that they were looking into com­plaints against the decision, specif­i­cal­ly the financial toll for farmers of trans­port­ing livestock to slaugh­ter­hous­es.

The gov­ern­ment has staunchly defended the changes and has also ques­tioned where oppo­si­tion to the decision was coming from.

In an interview with OC Media, Deputy Minister of Agri­cul­ture Tigran Gabrielyan claimed that 70% of the pro­tes­tors were middlemen who work for market meat vendors. He said the remaining pro­tes­tors were farmers who were being misled by these middlemen. 

‘Pre­vi­ous­ly, these middlemen would go and slaughter the animals in court­yards, weigh the meat, and charge the farmer, most of the time lying about the weight and charging extra’, Gabrielyan said. 

‘They would also take the byprod­ucts of the slaughter that cost a lot of money in the market and were, thus, harming the economy.’

Gabrielyan also said the gov­ern­ment was estab­lish­ing mobile slaugh­ter­hous­es that would be run by existing and future slaugh­ter­hous­es to alleviate the trans­porta­tion costs in villages far from any slaugh­ter­house.

‘We have also proposed slaugh­ter­hous­es establish certain days within the week where they will accept livestock for slaughter so that farmers know when to organise the trans­porta­tion of their animals’, explained Gabrielyan.

‘We are also going to provide ֏3 million-֏15 million ($3,500-$30,000) loans with a five per cent interest rate for estab­lish­ing new [static] slaugh­ter­hous­es’, he said. 

Gabrielyan also said the changes would provide a boost to the economy. ‘Byprod­ucts are worth a lot. Many are used in sausage and deli meat making’, he stated. ‘This can help local sausage and deli meat producers obtain sanitary afford­able ingre­di­ents, as well as boost export of byprod­ucts.’

The FSI has also remained adamant in their decision. On 21 January they posted photos of unhy­gien­i­cal­ly stored meat claiming that it will do every­thing in its power to prevent the con­di­tions shown in the pictures. 

The FSI said they had received many inquiries and appli­ca­tions about estab­lish­ing new slaugh­ter­hous­es around the country.

In a separate lengthy post, the FSI’s Anush Haru­tyun­yan insisted the problem was being addressed. 

‘As of 21 January, there are already 38 working slaugh­ter­hous­es. Six days ago on 15 January, there were only 22’, she wrote. ‘Tomorrow there will be more. Twenty more slaugh­ter­hous­es are under con­struc­tion and 27 are in the pre-design stage.’ 

‘Yesterday, we talked to a rep­re­sen­ta­tive of the Yezidi community. We were able to convince him and now he’s thinking about creating a slaugh­ter­house in his own community.’ 

She went on to say that in two months time there would be no village further than 30 kilo­me­tres from a slaugh­ter­house, meaning all livestock would be trans­port­ed for free. 

‘With the rise in the number of slaugh­ter­hous­es, the price will fall: it’s the law of markets’, Haru­tyun­yan stated.

Armenia wants net metering for small scale solar

PV Magazine International
Jan 22 2020


The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) is helping the Armenian government create a regulatory framework for small scale PV power generation.

The development lender wants consultants to advise the government as it formulates a medium to long-term vision for small scale solar through a distributed generation support mechanism which includes net metering or net billing.

The consultants appointed will have to design a system which provides quality assurance for solar arrays and solar water heaters while introducing incentives for such installations on households and commercial and industrial premises.

Incentives

Until now, Yerevan has incentivized only large scale solar plants and 1 MW solar parks.

The country’s only 50 MW solar tender was won by UAE-based Abdul Latif Jameel Energy in 2018, via its Spanish unit Fotowatio Renewable Ventures.

In August, the EBRD sought consultants to draw up feasibility studies for five solar projects in Armenia with generation capacities ranging from 5 MW to 19.4 MW.

The 50 MW Masrik 1 solar park and the five planned facilities are part of a $58 million, six-year, 110 MW large scale solar plan the government announced in May 2017.

168: The government’s measures tantamount to expropriation in the media industry

On , the Prime Minister of Armenia has launched attack on television companies in Armenia labelling them as “the corruptioners’ TV networks”. He went further saying that those TV channels must use “corruption” logos when they broadcast. Interestingly, the Government also discussed the need for transparency in business, including in the media industry, especially in relation to ownership and tax requirements (ultimate beneficial ownership). Furthermore, the Chairman of the Competition Commission surprisingly declared that the abuse of dominant position is available in the media industry.

It is apparent that the various state institutions have conspired together to attempt to silence critical media voices which are the threats to the independence of the media sector. The Government’s intent is to make the press serve those in power rather than the public. It is apparent the Government has no an evidence-based policy at all which would enable to assess the risks and implement the reforms.

Apart from the threats to media freedom, the Government intends to undertake regulatory measures which would be tantamount to expropriation which represents the most serious infringement of private property rights. The authorities must realize that at its essence, an expropriation is the taking of private property by a government acting in its sovereign capacity. If the Government decides to expropriate those television companies, it has two options: “lawful” and “unlawful” expropriations.

A “lawful” expropriation must be, at a minimum, for a public purpose, non-discriminatory and accompanied by a prompt, adequate and effective compensation. The principles of Armenian legislation recognize a similar standard and generally include the further requirement that expropriation be conducted according to due process of law. However, if it is an “unlawful”, the Government would open a floodgate for claims in courts and international arbitrations where the standard of compensation would be different and extremely high.

It is important to note that the authorities have already taken measures in the medial industry which have risen to a substantial deprivation (indirect expropriation) by arresting the owner of TV 5, Armen Tavadyan.

It is to be noted that the Government is already facing expropriation cases in international arbitration which have a negative impact on the country’s investment environment. The Government has failed to provide the minimum standards of protection – Lydian and Sanitek are likely to bring their arbitration claims against Armenia.

Furthermore, if the Government decides to revoke the TV licenses, it may result in an interference with the rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the European Convention of Human Rights which guarantees the right to property. Any such interference with the rights protected by Article 1 would fail to meet the requirement of lawfulness. It is the first and most important requirement and It must be compatible with the rule of law which includes freedom from arbitrariness. If there is an alleged violation, Armenia is required to compensate for expropriation. In addition, those TV companies can argue in the Strasbourg Court that there is a violation under Article 14 in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 i.e., the applicant has been denied all or part of a particular asset on a discriminatory ground and it was a politically-motivated deprivation under Article 18 of the Convention.

Concluding, the Government’s duty must be to ensure the sustainability of independent media in Armenia and ensure that its actions do not amount to a deprivation of property.

 GPARTNERS LAW FIRM

Sargis Grigoryan, Partner




Armenian humanitarian mission donates medical supplies to Aleppo hospital

Aravot, Armenia
Jan 16 2020

                                                       
                                                        

ԵՌԱԳՈՅՆ. The Armenian humanitarian mission in Syria donated medicine and medical supplies to the Aleppo Hospital on January 16th, the group’s spokesperson Nazeli Elbakian told ARMENPRESS.
The mission is being carried out by the Armenian Center for Humanitarian Demining & Expertise and includes medical and de-mining activities.

In the period of 2019 February 8 until 2020 January 16 the Armenian medics treated 13680 patients. The group’s de-miners have cleared 126000 square meters of territory.

The Syrian side once again thanked for the donation and emphasized the importance of the ongoing mission.

Armenian, Cameroonian FMs discuss development of cooperation

Armenian, Cameroonian FMs discuss development of cooperation

Save

Share

 10:27, 1 November, 2019

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 1, ARMENPRESS. Minister of Foreign Affairs of Armenia Zohrab Mnatsakanyan and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Cameroon Lejeune Mbella Mbella held a meeting within the framework of the 36th Ministerial Conference of La Francophonie in Monaco, the foreign ministry said in a news release.

During the meeting Mnatsakanyan and Mbella expressed mutual readiness to make joint efforts for enriching the bilateral agenda and to work in the direction of utilizing the existing big potential in the Armenian-Cameroonian relations.

In this context they attached importance to organizing consultations between the foreign ministries and activating high-level contacts and mutual visits.

The FMs outlines the scopes of enhancing directions of bilateral cooperation.

IT, smart development, innovation and commercial-economic sectors were pointed out as promising directions.

FM Mnatsakanyan briefed his Cameroonian counterpart on Armenia’s achievements in the abovementioned sectors and stressed Armenia’s readiness to implement exchange of experience programs.

The sides praised the cooperation and mutual support between the countries in international organizations. In this context they addressed the La Francophonie as an important arena for enhancing cooperation in the francophone region and addressing problems facing the societies.

The ministers discussed the results of the 36th Ministerial Conference, priorities of Armenia’s presidency in the organization and the planned joint work.

Edited and translated by Stepan Kocharyan




Asbarez: Ararat Home to Host Casino Night Fundraising Event

Ararat Home’s Casino Night will benefit the assisted living facility

MISSION HILLS—Adding fun to the Southern California Armenian community’s social calendar again this year is Ararat Home’s Casino Night XVI. This year, the event will take place on November 16 at the Deukmejian Grand Ballroom, located at 15105 Mission Hills Rd, Mission Hills, CA 91345.

“We invite everyone who loves to have a good time for a good cause to join us,” said event organizing Committee Chair Gary Kaloostian. Happy hour begins at 5:30 p.m., with a buffet dinner and professional gaming to follow. Valuable prizes will be awarded at the end of the evening, including a special $1,000 cash prize to celebrate in style.

Casino Night tickets are available for $60 pre-purchase or $70 at the door. Pre-event purchases should be made by check to Ararat Home or online. Complimentary valet parking and a photo booth will be provided. Further information may be found online or by calling 818.838.4860. Proceeds of Casino Night XVI will help Ararat Home’s expansion project on the new property adjacent to its current campus.

ACNIS reView from Yerevan #35, 2019_Editorial_Rejection and the Rejection of Rejection

Editorial   

19 OCTOBER 2019  

The well known events of 2018, which some argue was a change of power and others as revolution, started with rejection.  Initially, it was Serzh Sargsyan who was being rejected, subsequently, the Parliament, later the judges, and now the members of the Constitional Court.  Some of the radicals who are looking at the concept of rejection more globally – the Constitutional Court, the National Security Service, the Police, the Prosecutor's Office … are rejecting a number of laws, the Constitution and so continuously.

Rejection became not only a symbol of the revolution but also its substance.  On the other hand, the opposition, for its part, has begun to reject the rejecters, no matter what they reject and for what reason.  The important thing is to deny one another.  Rejection is transforming from a political category into a psychological phenomenon.

Hence, it is importantat to understand what in general is the psychology of denial, its reasons and its goals.

Rejection in relevant science is defined as a means of psychological protection when it is required to discard something undesirable, to erase it from life, from memory or ignore it. It is regarded as a simple protective measure. “Reject” should be distinguished from “discard.” To discard means to realize it, to analyze it, and to just push it out, changing the reality. Yet, rejection is rather a mechanical process, which has no profound effect on the conscious and does not change the situation. Again, this is the approach of science to psychology on this phenomenon.

Let’s return to our reality. The public was tired of living in illusions. There was no trust in political institutions, the electoral system, the judiciary or in the law enforcement agencies. The social “lift” had ceased to operate, and this situation was best described by Sarah Sargsyan, when he called it a “lukewarm atmosphere.”

The public rejected the apathetic atmosphere, but rejection is not a change of reality. The apathy had to be analyzed in public and its causes understood.  The phenomenon had to be assessed politically and legally and a policy and an action plan had to be developed to change it. That is to say, “rejection” should have turned into “discarding.”

Currently, Armenia is divided into two camps, the rejectors of the old system and the rejectors of the new.  That does not take us anywhere or more precisely, it takes us nowhere.  The euphoris of the revoluvtion is turning into a feast of hatery because the public does not see political solutions which for the sake of brighter purpose will unite the two camps.