Not Islamic Fascism But Something More Sinister

Not Islamic Fascism But Something More Sinister

American Daily, OH
July 27 2006

By Bruce Walker on Jul 27, 2006

Good people – good conservative people grappling for a way to describe
the current world war between good and evil – have latched onto the
term Islamic Fascism to describe the dangerous lying sadism stalking
the planet today. The reasoning behind using that term goes something
like this. Al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas, the current Baathist thugs
ruling Damascus, the former Baathist thugs ruling Baghdad and the
current brutal mullahs of Teheran are Moslems, so the threat is
Islam. The monsters trying all over the world to terrorize humanity
into surrendering to evil are Fascists because, well, because that
is the only politically correct term used today to describe evil
totalitarianism. Unfortunately, both words in the term Islamic Fascism
are not only wrong, but each creates more problems than it solves.

Islam has sometimes been a force against evil. Afghan Moslems resisted
the invading armies of the Soviet Union almost single-handedly
for ten years. These fearless warriors were a critical element in
bringing down the Evil Empire. How did America defeat the Taliban
in Afghanistan? American special forces fought side by side with
devout and brave Moslems of the Northern Alliance. The Shah of Iran
used modernized Islam to improve life in his nation, before he was
overthrown and replaced by the current evil mullahs. During the
Second World War, it was the Arab Legion of Amir Abdullah which
provided critical military support in defeating the pro-Axis Vichy
forces in Syria and then the pro-Nazi Iraqi forces; Abdullah was not
just a good Moslem, but a descendent of Mohammed.

Islam is not a "religion of peace" – some of the critiques of Islam
are probably long overdue – but Islam is also not a "religion of
evil." Islam does not work as well as the Judeo-Christian faith, but
nothing works as well as the Judeo-Christian faith. Suicide bombers
are nothing new: remember Kamikaze pilots in the Second World War?
Evil, not Islam, is the problem.

Many evil regimes in the world are hostile to Islam. Kim Jong Il,
ruler of North Korea, times his saber rattling to distract America
in the Middle East and Near Asia and supplies Iran with weapons and
support. His tortured, tiny empire always sides with these so-called
Islamic Fascists against America and Israel. China cynically plots
to weaken America for the next hot war, using Moslems as pawns in a
grand chess game.

Castro and Hugo Chavez support terrorism in the Middle East and Near
Asia. In June 2006, Hugo Chavez visited Iran, Syria, China and North
Korea to show solidarity with these enemies of America and Israel.
Cuba is the nation most hostile to Israel in the entire Western
Hemisphere and it is one of only seven regimes formally classified by
the State Department as a state sponsor of terrorism. Latin America
is brimming with terrorism that threatens us, and which we ignore at
our peril.

Are these threats Islamic? Kim Jong Il is not Moslem nor are the
rulers in Peking. Kim Jong Il has converted Marxism into a sort of
"man-god" theology, with his father, the "Great Leader," and him as
the "Dear Leader," made divine, but this bears no resemblance at all
to Islam. The Chinese have, in fact, a "Moslem problem" and are more
apt to be suppressing Moslems simply for being Moslems than almost
any other nation on Earth (except, perhaps, North Korea.) Castro is
a militant atheist, not a Moslem at all. Hugo Chavez is nominally a
Catholic (although the Catholic Church has been one of the fiercest
opponents of his Marxist regime in Venezuela.) The terrorists in
Columbia and Peru are not inspired by the Koran. How, then, could
any of these be characterized as "Islamic" anything? They cannot,
of course.

Today there is serious talk by serious people that the real culprit is
anti-Semitism, and it undoubtedly true that anti-Semitism is raising
its ugly head again. But anti-Semitism as a horrible evil was present
in Nazi Germany, in the Soviet Union and even in Imperial Japan,
which had almost no Jews or Moslems. (Ironically, the only evil
totalitarians who were long strong opponents of anti-Semitism in
the last century were the Fascists, who were also long the strongest
opponents of the Nazis for many years.) It is not Islam, peculiarly,
that descends into anti-Semitism and its attendant evil, but all
forms of true evil inevitably become anti-Semitic.

What about those craven, corrupt apologists for global terrorism
who take their pot shots at America safely behind the lines of our
bloodied troops? Senator Patty Murray famously said after 9-11 that
Osama bin Ladin did much good, building hospitals and schools, and that
poverty drove people into al-Qaida (nonsense, of course.) Yet is Murray
Islamic? Hardly. What about Cindy Sheehan and Congresswoman Cynthia
McKinney, slavish excusers of savage evil. Are they Moslems? No.

Jacques Chirac is a not Moslem. Vladimir Putin is not Moslem and he,
in fact, kills Moslems. Yet both presidents lean strongly toward the
side of evil in the global war today. These and other many other
supporters of evil obviously have a faith that transcends reason,
but it is often not the faith of Islam or faith in God of any sort.

Another problem with the Islamic part of Islamic Fascism is that
Arab totalitarianism has not always even been Moslem. Most people
recognize that the Baathist Party of Saddam Hussein is evil and so
would consider that Baathist Party as part of Islamic Fascism. Yet
the single good thing anyone can say about the Baathist Party of
Iraq is that it was not Islamic: it was, in fact, overtly secular;
the Deputy Prime Minister of Iraq under Hussein was Tarik Aziz, a
Christian. Most people recognize that the Baathist Party of Assad in
Syria is also evil, and yet how many people know that the founder of
the Baathist Party itself, both the Syrian and the Iraqi branches,
was Michel Aflaq, a Christian? The Baathist Party was intended to
represent the forces of Arab nationalism, not Islam. Kemal Ataturk
and those others who murdered over one million Armenians in the first
holocaust of this century were militantly secular and scrupulously
exclude Islam from the Turkish Republic.

Christians and Jews can, and have, cast their lot with the worst forces
of evil in the world. Aside from the awful Christians, like Aziz,
there have been awful Jews. Lazar Kaganovich, the Heinrich Himmler of
the Gulag, was Jewish as was Genrich Yagoda, head of Stalin’s secret
police. Some of the most vicious foes of Israel today are Jews and
some of the most cynical apologists for evil in America have been
Jewish. Surrendering to evil is an individual decision and neither
Torah nor Christ can prevent people from choosing to be evil.

If Islamic is an inaccurate term to describe our current war on evil,
the Fascism is even less accurate. Fascism existed as a ruling regime
in precisely one country in human history, Fascist Italy, and although
it has come to be used as a generic curse for any movement on the
non-existent Far Right, any examination of the forces of evil show
that they are all on the very real Far Left.

Kim Jong Il, Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez – all passionate supporters
of evil today – have done everything humanly possible to place
themselves as far to the Left as they can. China stubbornly holds on
to Marxism and Maoism as its formal political framework.

The motto of the Baathist Party is "Unity, Freedom, Socialism"
sounds remarkably like every Left-wing organization in the world. The
Baathist Party itself was relatively small until in 1952 it merged
with the Arab Socialist Party. The Baathists were the party within
Syria that favored close ties with the Soviet Union during the Cold
War. Ali Salih al-Sa’di, the practical leader of the Baathist Party
during much of the 1960s, declared himself a Marxist. General Afif
al-Bizri, the army chief of staff in Syria, was a Marxist. The Baathist
Party in Jordan never gained power, but it also worked closely with
the Communist Party in Jordan. Clearly this parent of two terrorist
nations – Syria and Iraq – and in other parts of Islam is not on the
nonexistent Far Right but rather on the very real Far Left (and allied
with atheistic Marxism.)

The strongest supporters in America of the global evil we face
are on the Far Left – Sheehan, Murray, McKinney as well as their
counterparts in the parliamentary democracies of other nations.
According to the politically correct ideological spectrum, which
places Fascism on the Far Right, this not only makes no sense but it
is flatly contradictory. Why is this so?

The Right – or rather, what has been called the Right or Far Right
– the group of people who embrace truth and decency and who do not
consider themselves anywhere on an invented political spectrum with
Fascism at one end and Marxism at the other end – there are the only
people fighting the common evil that we find in Hezbollah, Baathists,
al-Qaida, North Korea, Cuba, China and elsewhere. Fascism is the Far
Right according to the punditry of political science on our campuses
and in our media. So how can those who war on America, the nation
farthest to the Right on Earth, and Israel be Fascist? They cannot,
of course, any more than they can be Islamic or, even worse, Islamic
Fascist.

Is there a way to explain the vast evil that connects Kim Jong Il
to Cindy Sheehan to Osama bin Ladin to Jacques Chirac to the Shiite
mullahs of Iran? Yes, there is: I have written an entire book,
Sinisterism: Secular Religion of the Lie, which describes how evil
could come from a Baathist Party founded by a Christian Syrian and run
by an Iraqi Marxist, how evil could come from atheist Communists in
Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea and China who openly side with that which
we have come to call Islamic Fascism, and how this evil is exactly
the same evil that was Hitler and Stalin: that evil is Sinisterism.

The salient characteristics of Sinisterism are an insatiable lust for
power and a willingness to do anything, especially deliberate lying,
to acquire or to maintain power. This one term describes the odd
continuum that travels from bin Ladin, laughing with his companions
at the gullibility of suicide pilots, to the pandemic dishonesty of
the American Left, to the absurd lies of North Korea and Iran.

Sinisterists hate Jews, Christians, Israel or America for being Jews,
Christians, Israel or America. Sinisterism explains why the Baathist
Party could be allies of Hitler and then allies of the Soviets,
why the man-god Kim Jong Il supports the mullahs of Iran, why the
atheist Castro trains Palestinian terrorists, and why the good guys –
conservatives in democracies, loyal citizens of Israel and serious
Jews and Christians – also find themselves on the same side, whatever
their other differences.

The enemy we are fighting today is not just like the enemy we fought
in the Second World War or the Cold War, the enemy we fight today is
the same enemy we fought in the Second World War and in the Cold War.
The common enemy of all decent people is Sinisterism. It seeks to
destroy all serious Christians, all the Jewish people, the State of
Israel and America. And then it seeks to plunge mankind into the sort
of dark, eternal nightmare which George Orwell described so well. Know
your enemy, and our enemy – as Christians, as Jews, as Americans or
as Israelis – is Sinisterism: Secular Religion of the Lie.

BAKU: U.S. Minsk Group Co-Chair to make visit to region

U.S. Minsk Group Co-Chair to make visit to region

TREND Infomation, Azerbaijan
June 26 2006

Author: E.Huseynov

In a couple of days Deputy Assistant Secretary Matthew Bryza is
making his first visit to the region in his role as U.S. Minsk Group
Co-Chair, trend reports quoting Jonathan Henick, head of press service,
US Embassy to Baku.

Henick said Mr Bryza would visit Yerevan, Karabakh, and Baku to
discuss the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, and he will brief his fellow
Minsk Group Co-Chairs at the conclusion of his meetings.

Earlier Armenian media reported Mr Bryza would make his visit to
Karabakh on July 28-29. On the other hand, Azeri Foreign Minister
suggested this date to be July 31 or August 1.

Mr Henick said the exact date of Mr Bryza’s visit to the region is
not disclosed for security reasons.

______________________________________ ____________ Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

http://mail.yahoo.com

Armenian Tourism to Rise by 25%

ARMENIAN TOURISM TO RISE BY 25 PERCENT

Panorama.am
15:45 26/07/06

The first quarter of the year show that tourism has gone up by 15,3
percent. Some 46 023 tourists visited the country in the reporting
year, Karen Chshmarityan, minister of trade and economic development,
told a press conference today. Monitoring forecasts say the rise will
go up to 25 percent by the end of the year. Chshmarityan also said
that 42 675 tourists left Armenia in the first quarter of 2006.

Chshmarityan indicated that infrastructure development and a
number of other programs must be accomplished for the development
of tourism in Armenia. In his words, steps are taken to that
aim. Particularly, a video film picturing Armenia will be broadcast
by CNN soon. /Panorama.am/

E Prel: Cilician See Members at Ecumenical Dialogue in Switzerland

PRESS RELEASE
Eastern Prelacy of the Armenian Apostolic Church of America
138 East 39th Street
New York, NY 10016
Tel: 212-689-7810
Fax: 212-689-7168
e-mail: [email protected]
Website:
Contact: Iris Papazian

July 26, 2006

MEMBERS OF CILICIAN SEE PARTICIPATE IN
ECUMENICAL DIALOGUE IN SWITZERLAND

NEW YORK, NY-His Grace Bishop Anoushavan Tanielian, Vicar General of the
Eastern Prelacy of the United States and Ecumenical Officer of the
Catholicosate of Cilicia for the United States, and Ms. Nayiri Baljian,
delegate to the 9th Assembly of the World Council of Churches (WCC), joined
18 other men and women from around the world for an ecumenical seminar
entitled, "What It Means to be Human: Orthodox and Evangelicals in
Dialogue." The Seminar, which took place at the Ecumenical Institute,
Bossey, Switzerland, was the fourth in a series of topical dialogues between
members of Evangelical and Orthodox churches. The previous three seminars
each focused on one of the following themes: salvation, ecclesiology,
scriptures, and the way in which Orthodox and Evangelicals perceive one
another.
As indicated by its title, the agenda for this seminar centered on the
theme of theological anthropology, with the first two full days of the
program dedicated to hearing and responding to papers prepared by Rev. Dr.
Andrew Louth, Antiochian Orthodox priest and lecturer at the University of
Durham (England), and Dr. Mark Elliot, an evangelical and professor for the
School of Divinity at the University of St. Andrew’s (Scotland). Dr. Louth,
in his paper entitled, "An Orthodox Understanding of What it is to be
Human," discussed both the idea of human creation in the image of God and
the notion of hypostases, a Greek term used to express the existential
nature of human beings. Dr. Louth noted that from the Orthodox perspective,
and opposed to Western individualism, humans primarily exist in
relationship, with one another and God. Via current Orthodox scholarship,
Dr. Louth linked creation in the image of God to the individual’s prayer
life, while Orthodox participants in the seminar insisted that the
hypostatic reality of humanness relates to participation in the Eucharist,
i.e. corporate worship. Dr. James Stamoolis, Professor of Biblical Studies
at Trinity International University (United States), read a thoughtful
statement of response from the Evangelical perspective. Dr. Elliot presented
his paper on humanness from the Evangelical perspective, acknowledging that
a single "Evangelical perspective" on any matter is difficult to define. Dr.
Elliot concluded that in general Evangelicals view anthropology with
"sobriety," given Calvinistic views on the seriousness of sin and the
hopeless nature of the human soul sans Christ; however, in light of human
salvation and redemption through Jesus, humanness assumes a hopeful,
service-oriented significance.
Rev. Dr. Stelian Tofana, Romanian Orthodox priest and member of the
Theological Faculty at Cluj (Romania), responded to Dr. Elliot’s paper from
the Orthodox perspective. Through response statements and group discussion,
the plenary concluded that despite obvious differences pertaining to human
salvation and the depravity of human nature, Evangelicals and Orthodox share
a similar theological understanding of anthropology.
Day three of the seminar was spent in nearby Geneva, at the headquarters
of the WCC. Participants heard two lectures under the heading "Revisiting
the thought of the Reformation about anthropology within the context of
patristic views." Lecture one was given by Rev. Dr. Sven Opengaard, from the
Lutheran perspective, lecture two by Rev. Dr. Odair Pedroso Mateus, from the
Reformed perspective. Immediately following, Rev. Dr. Kersten Storch
presented recent work on anthropology by the Faith and Order commission of
the WCC. This work has been published in a booklet entitled, "Christian
Perspectives on Theological Anthropology: A Faith and Order Study Document"
(Faith and Order Paper No. 199, WCC, 2005, 58pp).
Rev. Dr. Samuel Kobia, General Secretary of the WCC, met briefly with
the group, discussing his vision for the WCC, including facilitating breadth
and depth of relationship among churches, via means such as ecumenical
dialogue.
The final two days of the seminar were dedicated to work in small
groups. Groups first focused either on the idea of creation in the image of
God or on the corporate vs. individual nature of anthropology, discussing
each (as assigned) from the Orthodox and Evangelical perspectives. Groups
next discussed practical matters pertaining to our convergent and divergent
views on anthropology. Various suggestions were made regarding steps that
might be taken jointly, particularly on social and ethical issues, in light
of the strong agreement between Evangelicals and Orthodox regarding
theological anthropology. A publication encompassing the reports of groups
and the papers/response statements presented from the entire series of
Evangelical-Orthodox dialogues at Bossey will be forthcoming.
Participants at the seminar strongly recommended continuing the
Orthodox-Evangelical dialogue in the same forum, and as such, a similar
seminar has been tentatively scheduled for the summer of 2008 at Bossey,
with a topic yet to be determined. The newly-formed dialogue steering
committee, to which Ms. Baljian was named, will stress the recruitment of
Orthodox theologians and lay leaders, as out of 20 attendees on this
occasion only six were Orthodox while 14 were Evangelical. Although the
Ecumenical Institute at Bossey is affiliated with the WCC and its seminars
receive support from WCC staff, the Orthodox-Evangelical dialogue series is
considered "unofficial," as participants need not be official delegates of
their churches. Open to the public, all Bossey seminars may be applied to,
following the instructions found online at

http://www.armenianprelacy.org
www.wcc-coe.org/bossey.

For Who And Against Who Serge Sargsyan Will Be Doing Everything?

FOR WHO AND AGAINST WHO SERGE SARGSYAN WILL BE DOING EVERYTHING?

Lragir.am
24 July 06

"Dear Republicans, our cooperation went a long way, and despite the
tenacious provocations we managed to distinguish the primary from the
secondary, we managed to ignore minor personal issues and successfully
solve the problems we had set before us. However, the challenges our
state and people are facing require more." These lines are from the
speech Serge Sargsyan delivered at the end of the conference of the
Republican Party on July 22. Their main and only peculiarity is that
these lines were uttered during the first 35 seconds of the first
speech of Serge Sargsyan as a Republican. It was the first speech of
the newly elected chair of the Council of the Republican Party, which
was the last in the extraordinary conference of the Republican Party.

Certainly, we do not think that the extraordinary conference of the
Republican Party is a show, but perhaps it is interesting to note
that a rule of shows concerns every public event in which speeches
are made. The participants of the show dispute over the right for
the last speech because they say the audience remembers the last
performance the best. And perhaps after the conference closed with
the speech of Serge Sargsyan the members of the party memorized the
speech of the newly elected deputy leader of the party Serge Sargsyan
rather than the speech of the old leader of the party Andranik
Margaryan. And though we do not compare this situation with a show,
there is an interesting nuance about the speeches of the old leader
of the Republican and his new vice, nevertheless. Serge Sargsyan, who
had just been elected chair of the Council of the Republican Party,
spoke about the political developments, activity, plans and priorities
of the party more than the leader Andranik Margaryan. In other words,
Serge Sargsyan said what the Republicans must do and why.

"Cooperation is good but we have to come together. The healthy and
able forces of the republic have to come together, and I think that by
this conference we give a start to this process. Depending on whether
we succeed or fail I think we can renovate this idea or discredit
it. We have determined members of the party, we have a powerful army
of supporters, we have political will and resolve to lead our country
forward, raise it to a new level. I am sure that we will solve this
problem successfully. At least, I will do everything for us to win,"
the newly elected chair of the Council of the Republican Party Serge
Sargsyan concluded his first speech.

It certainly contains a great number of questions the answers to which
do have importance for the country. Particularly, can the minister
announcing about the unification of healthy forces see healthy forces
in the opposition and is he ready to ally with them?

"I can see healthy forces everywhere. Armenia does not have a problem
of healthy forces. Armenia has a problem with uniting these forces,"
says Serge Sargsyan. In this case, it is more than surprising that the
minister of defense, speaking about an alliance of healthy forces,
becomes a member of the Republican Party. Perhaps he thinks that
healthy forces are only in the Republican Party. In this case, why
does he announce that he can see healthy forces everywhere? If he
can see them everywhere, why did he go to the Republican? Perhaps the
most convenient characterization of someone who aspires to uniting all
the healthy forces of the nation would be an independent non-partisan
figure who is not confined to the party’s interests.

Otherwise, it is difficult to understand for whose victory Serge
Sargsyan will be doing "everything", the Republican Party or the
healthy forces of everywhere? And again a question occurs, if healthy
forces, why inside the Republican Party?

HAKOB BADALYAN

Flatbread Baked In Shushi Sells The Best

FLATBREAD BAKED IN SHUSHI SELLS THE BEST

Azat Artsakh, Nagorno Karabakh Republic [NKR]
21 July 2006

A bakery was opened in Shushi four months ago (formerly it was in
Stepanakert) but has already a number of customers thanks to the
quality of bread. The manager of the bakery Saghatel Hovasapyan said
they moved to Shushi because in Stepanakert they did not have workers,
the conditions were bad. In Shushi they do not have such problems. 17
people work at the bakery, they bake 1500 flatbreads a day which are
sold in Stepanakert and Shushi. The workers are satisfied with the
conditions and say if there is demand, they can bake as much as 3000
flatbreads a day.

AA.

21-07-2006

International scientific conference on issues of cardiology to open

International scientific conference on issues of cardiology to open in
Yerevan

ArmRadio.am
22.07.2006 11:48

A two-day international scientific conference dedicated to issues of
cardiology will open in Yerevan today. Some 200 doctors form Yerevan
and marzes will participate in the conference.

The scientific conference aims at introducing Armenian doctors to
the latest novelties in the world medicine.

EU Special Representative to Hold Talks with Armenian Leaders

EU Special Representative to Hold Talks with Armenian Leaders

PanARMENIAN.Net
21.07.2006 15:33 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ July 23-25 EU Special Representative for the South
Caucasus Peter Semneby will be in Armenia on a working visit, reports
the Press Service of the Armenian MFA. During his visit Mr. Semneby
will meet with Armenian President Robert Kocharian, Speaker Tigran
Torosyan, Defense Minister Serge Sargsyan, FM Vartan Oskanian,
Ombudsman Armen Harutyunyan and Central Electoral Commission Chair
Garegin Azaryan.

EU-Armenia cooperation within the European Neighborhood Policy (ENP)
will be the main subject of Peter Semneby’s visit.

Armenia Approves Sale of Electricity Networks to Russia

ARMENIA APPROVES SALE OF ELECTRICITY NETWORKS TO RUSSIA

Armenpress

MOSCOW, JULY 20, ARMENPRESS: Armenia’s authorities have authorized a
U.K.-based Midland Resources Holding Ltd. to sell its 100% stake in
the Armenian Electricity Networks (AEN) to Interenergo, a subsidiary
of Russia’s Inter UES.

Interenergo is a joint venture of Inter UES (60%), a subsidiary
of Russia’s electricity monopoly Unified Energy System (UES), and
state-owned Rosenergoatom (40%), the world’s largest nuclear energy
company. The deal was approved by the Public Services Regulatory
Commission of Armenia Wednesday. Under Armenian energy legislation,
the company was not entitled to sell its shares in the AEN without
obtaining permission from the Armenian government and the committee.

Interenergo said it was willing to lease AEN for a 99 year
term. Midland Resources had acquired 100% of AEN shares for $40
million.

Margarita Grigorian, a spokeswoman for AEN, could not tell when the
deal will be formalized and would not disclose its price, saying it
would be announced after signing the deal.

MFA of Armenia

MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
—————————————— —-
PRESS AND INFORMATION DEPARTMENT
Government House # 2, Republic Square
Yerevan 0010, Republic of Armenia
Telephone: +37410. 544041 ext 202
Fax: +37410. 562543
Email: [email protected]

PRESS RELEASE

19-07-2006

Minister Oskanian Visits Bosnia and Herzegovina

Minister Oskanian is in Bosnia and Herzegovina on a three-day working
visit. On July 18, he met with his counterpart Mladen Ivanic.

During the meeting, the two focused on a number of bilateral and
international issues. They noted that Armenia – Bosnia-Herzegovina
relations are in the formation stage, and expressed mutual interest
in deepening the economic cooperation, which can be enhanced due to
the absence of political disagreement between the two countries.

In this context, the Ministers stressed the need to create a legal
framework, which will contribute to deepening and activating bilateral
relations. Specifically, they stressed the importance of preparing
agreements on support and protection of investments, trade and economic
cooperation, visits without an entrance visa for those with diplomatic
and service passports.

The Ministers touched upon the current status of development of the
Republic of Armenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Minister Ivanic spoke
of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s development following the collapse of
Yugoslavia the peace that followed the Dayton Accords.

The two exchanged views on the European orientation of their countries’
foreign policies, and presented the present status of their relations
with the European Union and NATO.

Minister Oskanian and Minister Ivanic also stressed the importance
of mutually beneficial cooperation in the framework of international
organizations.

Both attached importance to boosting cultural cooperation for the two
peoples get to know each other. In this regard, visits of delegations
and cultural events should be organized, they said.

The Ministers informed each other on the latest developments in
the region, as well as the two countries’ present relations with
neighboring countries.

Minister Oskanian briefed his counterpart on the present status of
the Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement process.

Toward the end of the meeting, Armenia’s Foreign Minister invited
Minister Ivanic to visit Armenia. A press conference followed the
meeting.

www.armeniaforeignministry.am