BAKU: French mediator upbeat about chances for resolving NK conflict

French mediator upbeat about chances for resolving Armenian-Azeri conflict

Azad Azarbaycan TV, Baku
25 May 05

[Presenter] The French co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group, Bernard
Fassier, believes that there are favourable conditions for the signing
of a peace accord [to resolve the Karabakh conflict].

Fassier said that at the Warsaw meeting between the [Armenian and
Azerbaijani] presidents [on 15 May], the mediating countries occupied
a clear-cut position, i.e. a military option is unacceptable. There
are good opportunities to speed up the resolution of the Karabakh
problem after the Warsaw meeting of the presidents and consequently,
to hammer out a peace agreement, Bernard Fassier said.

The French co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group, believes that the
activities of the co-chairmen and the [Azerbaijani and Armenian]
foreign ministers has considerably increased. Assessing this
positively, the co-chairman thinks that there is no way that the peace
talks can be abandoned at this stage.

[Fassier, speaking in Russian with Azeri voice-over] A peaceful
resolution to the conflict is the best option. It is important to
speed up the process for resolving the conflict. There is some
fundamental progress though it is insufficient. We hope to succeed in
signing an agreement between the sides to the conflict in the end.

[Correspondent] While giving a high assessment of the presidents’
Warsaw meeting, the diplomat said that the French and Russian foreign
ministers in the talks had not submitted a peace plan to the
presidents. Fassier said that they had only provided them with their
recommendations for a peace initiative. However, the ministers also
highlighted that it was Armenia and Azerbaijan which shoulder primary
responsibility.

[Passage omitted: the sides involved in the conflict rather than
mediators should make more of an effort to seek a solution; tension on
the border has eased recently]

System of a Down downplays politics

Associated Press
May 25 2005

System of a Down downplays politics

NEKESA MUMBI MOODY

Associated Press

NEW YORK – System of a Down wants you to know they are not a
political band. Yes, they came out against the war in Iraq. And yes,
they hand-picked ultraliberal gadfly Michael Moore to direct their
2003 protest video, “Boom!” And yes, their latest single, the
frenetic, guitar-crunching “B.Y.O.B.,” contains angry rants like “Why
don’t presidents fight the war? Why do they always send the poor?”

But still, Serj Tankian and Daron Malakian – one half of the eclectic
metal quartet – fiercely resist when people try to define them as the
band with the left-leaning agenda.

“The fact that journalists have so made us into a political band,
it’s forcing us to be apolitical in some ways as a reaction to it,”
says Tankian, who on this day is the antithesis of his wild-man stage
persona – soft-spoken and drinking herbal tea to soothe a sore
throat.

“I mean, we do say things that are on our minds, but most of what we
say is from a social perspective more than a political perspective,”
he adds. “Even though we have things that we touch upon, you know,
social issues or political issues, it’s a small percentage of what we
do, compared to personal narratives, songs about life, theories, sex,
humor.”

Besides the politically charged first single – which Tankian won’t
even admit is an anti-war song, despite the soldier-themed video –
there’s plenty of material on their latest album, “Mezmerize,” to
back up Tankian’s contention. The CD, part of outpouring of material
that will continue in the form of a second album, “Hypnotize,” in the
fall, is at times mournful, romantic, hysterical, and bizarre – and
may be the best synopsis of System of a Down in the band’s 10-year
history.

“There was a time when they had to write songs very specifically to
define who they were,” says longtime producer Rick Rubin, who worked
with the band on their latest album. “Now, we know who they are, so
now they can write their best songs, and they don’t have to fit in
such narrow guideline. It seems like people are more willing to go
along the trip with them.”

Not that they didn’t have plenty on board for their first trip on the
charts.

Since the group’s self-titled debut CD in 1998, they’ve sold millions
of albums with their amped-up metal sound anchored by bursts of
melody and Tankian’s voice, which ranges from soaring to screeching
(the other band members are bassist Shavo Odadjian, and drummer John
Dolmayan). The new album, like previous System of a Down efforts, is
hard to classify or describe: Middle Eastern-musical influences mix
with almost operatic melodies and guitars thrashing at breakneck
speed.

“It’s rare to hear such emotional vocal harmony going on over such
heavy music. It’s very unusual,” says Rubin (the band is on his
label, American Recordings, with Columbia Records).

“They’re kind of a throwback to the time when heavy music could be
interesting in the ’60s and ’70s. I think they’re a true metal band
but metal has changed and gone away from the days of Black Sabbath
and become really cookie-cutter. Everyone is competing to be the
hardest, but no one is really writing songs.”

Unlike some other metal bands, System of a Down’s lyrical content has
always been as integral to the band as its musical component, dealing
with serious subjects ranging from drug addiction to government
domination. System of a Down has always been vocal about their social
causes or concerns, whether it be Tankian playing benefits to draw
awareness to the Armenian holocaust of years ago (he and Malakian are
of Armenian descent) to Malakian’s concerns about the war in Iraq (he
has family there).

Malakian, the band’s lead guitarist and songwriter (along with
Tankian) says the band’s tilt toward the political is only one part
of what they stand for.

“It’s funny, you’ll write a few songs about politics and that’s what
people will focus on. All we’re doing is expressing the world around
us,” he says. “Politics is a part of that. If we didn’t sing about it
then we’d be leaving something else out.”

“I think they just don’t like being pigeonholed. I think yes they
sing a lot of political lyrics but they’re not purely a political
band,” Rubin says. “They don’t like being made smaller than they are
creatively.”

Tankian says fans truly know the band know they are more than that,
anyway.

“We’re a multidimensional band artistically that embrace politics as
much as embracing sexual innuendo or jokes,” Tankian added.

The humor element is certainly evident on the new record – “Cigaro”
features unprintable lyrics about male genitalia, while “Old School
Hollywood,” which Malakian wrote after feeling a little left out at a
celebrity softball game, features lines like: “Tony Danza cuts in
line / Old school Hollywood, washed up Hollywood / Standing in the
sun I’m wasting my time / Old school Hollywood washed up Hollywood.”

“Even in our most serious songs there’s like absolutely hilarious
antics going on and that comes from us just thinking, ‘Hey, we can’t
take ourselves seriously otherwise we miss the point, and no one
should either,'” Tankian jokes.

While Malakian as always written most of the band’s music, this time
around, he wrote more of the lyrics and shares more in the vocal
duties, trading rants with Tankian.

Malakian’s singing “changes our sound and that’s really important,”
Tankian says. “I don’t think any of us ever want to recreate the same
record again.”

That was part of the goal of “Mezmerize,” the band’s first since
2002’s “Steal This Album.”

“You want to push yourself and not recreate the same song over
again,” Malakian says. “That by itself brings out new things. When
you try to do new things, you find that you start failing at it.”

“If you refuse to kill in Russia , you will go to prison”

Kavkaz Center, Turkey
May 25 2005

«If you refuse to kill in Russia , you will go to prison»

In his interview to `Real Azerbaijan ‘, Alexander Litvinenko
responded to the statement of the Russian Embassy in Armenia

– Mr. Litvinenko, what is your comment on the statement of the
Russian Embassy in Armenia concerning your announcement about
connection of the GRU to the shooting of Armenian parliament that is
the consequence of Boris Berezovsky’s political order and
insinuations against the Russian-Armenian relations?

– Russian Embassy in Armenia is trying to wash away the crimes of
Russian Special Services by all means. I declare once more that
shooting of the Armenian parliament was organized by the GRU.

Boris Berezovsky is a political figure. And the fact of recognition
of his status by the Russian Embassy indicates that all former
statements of the official Kremlin about Berezovsky are deprived of
any grounds. Berezovsky has never mentioned that he is interested in
weakening of Russia ‘s role in the region and in deterioration of
relations between Russia and the states of the Southern Caucasus .

Moreover, as Executive Secretary for the CIS in the past, Berezovsky
has done a great deal for the development of Russian-Armenian
relations. The Russian diplomats in Armenia present the desirable for
the actual when they note that I speak for Berezovsky and implement
his will. At present I am a veteran of military service, lieutenant
colonel transferred to the reserve. Even when the judge advocate
brought in an action against me to reduce to the ranks (as it is
known, hearing of the case was held in my absence), the court
rejected his suggestion.

I was dismissed from the FSB on the basis of the edict issued by
Vladimir Putin, and it was related with the `organizational’
measures.

The embassy is casting aspersions on me.

– Some Russian media, close to the Kremlin have reported that you are
abusing your once high position in the leadership of FSB and
misinform the public…

– But then I am asking – Why have not they brought action against me?
My books were on sale in Moscow for a long time. Then they banned my
books. As to my second book, it was sold even in the building of
State Duma. No one has ever brought an action against me. No one,
neither Putin nor the FSB insisted on refutation. Each of my
statement was confirmed with the corresponding documents of special
services. Anywhere, in Norway , Denmark , Bulgaria , etc., in any
country, the representatives of Russian embassies said that it was
insinuation and nothing else. I produce the documents, name the
witnesses, and give detailed interviews. But they respond to all that
with one word – insinuation! And there is no one to say anything.

As to the statement concerning Russian Embassy in Armenia , I repeat,
they are trying to wash away terrorism and dirt from their special
services. Russian Special Services is a terrorist organization.

– Taking the opportunity, I would like to ask you if you have any
information regarding the relatives of Aslan Maskhadov and field
commander Doku Umarov, captured by the Russian Special Services.

– I also read Doku Umarov’s interview published by the Chechen sites,
in which he says that his relatives were taken hostages by Russian
special services. As to the whereabouts of Maskhadov’s relatives,
nothing is known to me. The Chechens suppose they are killed. Let the
Russian ambassador in Armenia answer this question – Where are Aslan
Maskhadov’s relatives? According to the Russian legislature, they are
considered the citizens of Russia , aren’t they? What has become of
them ? Where are they today?…

If you refuse to kill in Russia , you will go to prison.

Interview with Mr. Litvinenko was conducted by Elnur Eminogly , `Real
Azerbaijan’

Kavkaz-Center

FM says no decision on relocation of Russian bases from Georgia

Arminfo
25 May 05

YEREVAN

It is early to speak about the redeployment of Russian military bases
from Georgia to Armenia, Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan has
told Armenian Public TV.

He said that there was no specific decision to that effect for the
time being.

“But in any case this decision can be adopted exclusively by Armenia
and Russia but no other third side,” the Armenia foreign minister
said.

At the same time, the minister recalled a bilateral Armenian-Russian
document on deployment of a Russian base on the republic’s territory,
as well as Armenia’s commitments to the European community regarding
arms quota within the framework of the Conventional Arms Treaty in
Europe.

Reconstruction of Streets & Highways Leading To Yerevan Very Soon

RECONSTRUCTION OF STREETS AND HIGHWAYS LEADING TO YEREVAN WILL START
WITHIN THE NEAREST FUTURE

YEREVAN, MAY 23. ARMINFO. Works on reconstruction of the streets and
highways leading to Yerevan will start within the nearest future.
Head of the Department for Town Planning and Architecture of Yerevan
Municipality, Chief Architect of Yerevan Samvel Danielyan informed
journalists at a briefing today. He said that the buildings, trade
points in the streets, in particular in Leninradyan street, will be
brought in conformity with the town planning norms that is in a singe
architectural style, the pavements will be repaired and trees will be
planted in the territory. The works will start within the coming 10
days. By June 15 construction in Leninakani street will start.
Denielyan said that the Yerevan Project Institute proposed liquidating
all the small trade points built at the expense of green plantations
and construct a trading center instead. Besides, the streets
Shinararneri and Nar Dos will be reconstructed.

Taking into account that almost all the facilities were built by the
residents of the above streets, Yerevan Project proposed two ways out
of the situation. Either the resident carry out construction on their
own funds, or these territories are fully alienated for state and
public needs and the construction is financed by private investors.

Pantheon is not sold?

A1plus

| 13:49:56 | 23-05-2005 | Social |

PANTHEON IS NOT SOLD?

`We will not allow the sale of any area in the city pantheon except the
court building’, said the municipality urban development and architecture
administration chief architect Samvel Danielyan during the usual briefing.
According to him, the Komitas Park was to be reconstructed 2 years ago by
the project of architect Stepan Qyurqchyan, but because of the death of the
architect the project will be realized by his daughter and granddaughter.

The speaker also referred to the problems if the urban development sphere,
particularly the historical monuments if the North and Main Avenues.
Whatever is possible to transport, will be gathered in one place. As for the
Arami str. 62 and Abovyan ¼ buildings, Samvel Danielyan claims that they
will be enhanced or at least deconstructed and rebuilt in the same way.

During one month the municipality will put to discussion the problem of the
areas of Kond, Grigor Lusavorich Church, and Chemical plant. Samvel
Danielyan also referred to the half buildings, particularly to the hotel
`Sevan’. He said that if the construction of the hotel does not restart in a
month, the building will be wholly deconstructed as it does not correspond
to the demands of the modern architecture.

Armenian Spiritual Leader Condemns Desecration to Qur’an

Armenian Spiritual Leader Condemns Desecration to Qur’an

Iranian Quran News Agency, Iran
May 19 2005

5/19/2005

Tehran, IQNA: May 19, 2005-Armenian spiritual leader,Catholicos Aram I,
in a meeting with the head of department of culture &Islamic science
condemned American troop’s desecration to holy Qur’an in Guantanamo.

“Outrageous remarks and desecration acts to religious values and
Scriptures are not justified anywhere and ought to be condemned.”

Armenian spiritual leader here in Tehran saying this added the very
first measure in avoiding such outrages is dialogue among religions.

ICSD’s public relations office reported.

Today dialogue among religions is a principle matter and all divine
religions should take effective steps to get closer to each other and
it is incumbent upon followers of all divine religions to support
one another and heed not to provocative remarks of malicious media
empire. Cath1olicos Aram I, concluded.

At this friendly meeting, ICSD’s head, Hujjat-ul-Islam Mahmood
Mohammadi Araghi also condemned the desecration to holy Qur’an and
called for dialogue among religions.

Kazimirov: Yerevan and Baku positions over Karabakh status stillinco

KAZIMIROV: YEREVAN AND BAKU POSITIONS OVER KARABAKH STATUS STILL INCOMPATIBLE

Pan Armenian News
20.05.2005 04:14

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ No matter how conflicting are the political and
economic assessments of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline, it is
another “cold shower” for those who are for the force solution of the
Karabakh conflict, head of the Russian mediation mission, Russian
President’s plenipotentiary representative for Nagorno Karabakh,
participant and Co-Chair of the OSCE Minsk Group in 1992-1996,
Ambassador Vladimir Kazimirov writes in Chance for Karabakh article
in the Moskovskie Novosti (Moscow News). The publication notes,
“Investors of the project hardly count more on hostilities in the
region than on the soonest return of the investments – both financial
and political. At the celebrities May 25 speaking of the military
solution of the Karabakh problem will not be favorable, while public
speakers have been playing games with the people on it for years. And
no due efforts are made to establish peace in the region. Let us
take as an example the talks between Presidents Ilham Aliyev and
Robert Kocharian. It seemed as if it is difficult to overrate their
importance for the settlement of the conflict, however the leaders are
waiting for large international forum for that. Their fourth meeting
within the past two years was held in Warsaw May 15 on the eve of the
Council of Europe summit. In Warsaw Russian and French FMs and the
US special representative supported the efforts of OSCE MG Co-Chairs,
who have been arranging the meeting of the Presidents for a long time,
calling them to a fruitful work. After a two-hour rendezvous Aliyev
and Kocharian refrained from statements. The Co-Chairs expressed
moderate optimism, noting the Presidents have confirmed their
interest in peaceful settlement. Responses are rather contradictory:
from skepticism to breaking headlines Karabakh Has Surrendered or
Armenia Will Return All Seven Regions. However Armenians spoke of
the latter already in the course of the war, the question is which
are the concessions in return. The statements of both Presidents
have shown that their positions over the main disputable issue –
the status of Nagorno Karabakh – are still incompatible. It is not
clear yet whether the skirmish will decline, whether the parties will
return to fulfillment of their commitments in compliance with the
1995 agreement on settlement of incidents, will official Baku cut
down militant rhetoric. The CoE was not suitable for the calls to
return Karabakh “by all means:” the force atavisms were left outside
European values long before. The problem of Karabakh settlement is
itself complex. Any its component is rich with nuances, as they say
“a devil in details.” Only a person happy due to lack of information
can dream of a quick solution of the Karabakh problem. The real
difficulties are being burdened with something else pretty often.
Sometimes its refusal from contacts between the parties, the dragging
of the regular talks, sometimes a chase for propagandistic infusion
at expense of the negotiations, sometimes sudden attacks against the
mediators or appealing to other international organizations and feeble
calls to gain revenge by force…”

BAKU: Ilham Aliyev: In Nagorno Karabakh process certain advances too

Ilham Aliyev: In Nagorno Karabakh process certain advances to observe

20 May 2005 [16:35] – Today.Az

The Upper Karabakh problem will be solved in the frame of the
territorial integrity of Azerbaijan.

This was announced by the Azerbaijani President, Ilham Aliyev, on 19
May in Ganja at the meeting of the City executive power, Trend reports.

According to him, during peaceful talks process, certain advances are
observed. And these advances, along with political and diplomatic
successes, occur thanks to growth of the economic potential of
Azerbaijan, he added.

Aliyev said, that in the Council of Europe Warsaw summit framework
he conducted discussions with heads of other states on the Nagorno
Karabakh conflict and the just position of Azerbaijan is accepted
today by the world public. The head of the state assured the public of
Ganja that the leadership of the country will continue their efforts
for peaceful and just settlement of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict.

Same yarstick applied to hammer and Zhiguli drives

AZG Armenian Daily #092, 21/05/2005

Home

SAME YARDSTICK APPLIED TO HAMMER AND ZHIGULI DRIVERS

On May 19, the Armenian Parliament discussed the draft law of changes
and amendments to the Code of Administrative Infringements. The
lawmakers focused particularly on traffic law violations by
drivers. But the stances of the side presenting the draft law and
members of the centrist Rule of Law Party diametrically differed on
the issue of the size of fines.

Adviser of justice minister, Gevorg Kostanian, claims that the draft
law will keep traffic policemen away from punishing drivers. “This
change is necessary to limit the traffic police’s willful acts against
our citizens”, Kostanian said.

The next reform put forward in the parliament will concern placing
cameras on the streets of heavy traffic. If a driver neglects a
traffic inspector’s stop signal, he will be fined 100 thousand drams.

Gevorg Kostanian explained the reason of deputies’ negative response,
“This law aims at limiting the rights of the rich as 100 thousand is
not affordable for most of the drivers”.

“We are against this draft law. It does not consider whether the
lawbreaker is a tractor or Mercedes driver. The punishment got very
severe. They suggest raising today’s fines, 3-10 thousand drams, to 100
thousand but it’s clear that Mercedes and Hammer drivers will avoid
paying and the middle-class drivers will have to carry the burden”,
deputy chairman of State Legal Committee, Hovhannes Margarian says.

By Karine Danielian